RESUMEN
In 2021, the Food and Drug Administration Oncology Center of Excellence announced Project Optimus focusing on dose optimization for oncology drugs. The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) Taskforce met to review and discuss the optimization of dosage for oncology trials and to develop a practical guide for oncology phase I trials. Defining a single recommended phase II dose based on toxicity may define doses that are neither the most effective nor the best tolerated. MDICT recommendations address the need for robust non-clinical data which are needed to inform trial design, as well as an expert team including statisticians and pharmacologists. The protocol must be flexible and adaptive, with clear definition of all endpoints. Health authorities should be consulted early and regularly. Strategies such as randomization, intrapatient dose escalation, and real-world eligibility criteria are encouraged whereas serial tumor sampling is discouraged in the absence of a strong rationale and appropriately validated assay. Endpoints should include consideration of all longitudinal toxicity. The phase I dose escalation trial should define the recommended dose range for later testing in randomized phase II trials, rather than a single recommended phase II dose, and consider scenarios where different populations may require different dosages. The adoption of these recommendations will improve dosage selection in early clinical trials of new anticancer treatments and ultimately, outcomes for patients.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , Terapias en Investigación/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low is a newly defined category with HER2 1+ or 2+ expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and lack of HER2 gene amplification measured by in situ hybridization (ISH). Much remains unknown about the HER2-low status across tumor types and changes in HER2 status between primary and metastatic samples. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HER2 expression by IHC was evaluated in 4701 patients with solid tumors. We have evaluated the HER2 expression by IHC and amplification by ISH in paired breast and gastric/gastroesophageal (GEJ) primary and metastatic samples. HER2 expression was correlated with ERBB2 genomic alterations evaluated by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in non-breast, non-gastric/GEJ samples. RESULTS: HER2 expression (HER2 IHC 1-3+) was found in half (49.8%) of the cancers, with HER2-low (1 or 2+) found in many tumor types: 47.1% in breast, 34.6% in gastric/GEJ, 50.0% in salivary gland, 46.9% in lung, 46.5% in endometrial, 46% in urothelial, and 45.5% of gallbladder cancers. The concordance evaluation of HER2 expression between primary and metastatic breast cancer samples showed that HER2 3+ remained unchanged in 87.1% with a strong agreement between primary and metastatic samples, with a weighted kappa (Κ) of 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.91). ERBB2 alterations were identified in 117 (7.5%) patients with non-breast, non-gastric/GEJ solid tumors who had NGS testing. Of 1436 patients without ERBB2 alterations, 512 (35.7%) showed any level HER2 expression by IHC. CONCLUSION: Our results show that HER2-low expression is frequently found across tumor types. These findings suggest that many patients with HER2-low solid tumors might benefit from HER2-targeted therapies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Humanos , Femenino , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Hibridación in Situ , Inmunohistoquímica , Genómica/métodos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of, and risk factors for, acute kidney injury (AKI) after endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease (PAD) remain unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the proportion of patients who develop AKI and explore the risk factors. METHODS: Prospectively collected data on patients undergoing femoropopliteal endovascular intervention for symptomatic PAD across three vascular centres were analysed. The proportion of patients developing AKI (according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes definition) within 48 h, and the proportion developing the composite Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE) endpoints (death, dialysis, drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate at least 25 per cent) at 30 days (MAKE30) and remains 90 days (MAKE90) were calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess predictors of AKI, and the association between AKI and death. RESULTS: Some 2041 patients were included in the analysis. AKI developed in 239 patients (11.7 per cent), with 47 (2.3 per cent) requiring dialysis within 30 days, and 18 (0.9 per cent) requiring ongoing dialysis. The MAKE30 and MAKE90 composite endpoints were reached in 358 (17.5 per cent) and 449 (22.0 per cent) patients respectively. Risk factors for AKI were age, sex, congestive heart failure, chronic limb-threatening ischaemia, emergency procedure, and pre-existing chronic kidney disease. AKI, dementia, congestive heart failure, and major amputation were risk factors for medium-term mortality. CONCLUSION: AKI is a common complication after intervention for PAD and is associated with medium-term mortality.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Anciano , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs which are dysregulated in disease states, such as oral cancer. Extracellular vesicles, a potential source of microRNA, are found in saliva. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that a quantifiable amount of microRNA can be isolated from oral swirl samples. Additionally, we hypothesized that extracellular vesicles may protect contained microRNA from degradation in these samples. METHOD: A polyethylene glycol-based precipitation was used for extracellular vesicle enrichment of oral swirl samples. Comparison was made between samples treated with and without RNase. Further, samples from three subjects were exposed to a range of conditions over 7 days and assessed for presence of microRNA by reverse-transcription quantitative PCR. Extracellular vesicles from samples were identified under transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: An adequate quantity of microRNA for qPCR analysis was extractable from samples despite exposure to conditions under which degradation of RNA would be expected. CONCLUSION: A technique was developed to isolate an adequate quantity of microRNA for analysis from oral swirl samples. Extracellular vesicle-associated microRNA may be protected from degradation. This technique moves towards chairside application of translational microRNA research in the field of oral cancer prognostics.
Asunto(s)
Vesículas Extracelulares , MicroARNs/aislamiento & purificación , Saliva/química , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Humanos , Boca , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa InversaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study had two aims: (a) to test the hypothesis that advanced age is associated with lower levels of tolerability and clinical benefit to experimental Phase I trial agents; (b) to assess the validity of the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score as a patient selection tool in older patients. METHODS: Clinico-pathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of all patients treated consecutively from 2005 to 2009 in phase I trials at the RMH were recorded. All toxicity and clinical outcome data were compared between patients aged below and above 65 years of age. RESULTS: One thousand and four patients were treated in 30 Phase I trials, with 315 (31%) patients aged 65 years and older. Grade 3-5 toxicities (22.8% vs 24.8% (P=0.52)), trial discontinuation (6% vs 4%; P=0.33), and dose interruptions (8.0% vs 8.0% (P=0.96)) were observed at similar rates in patients below and above 65 years of age, respectively. The overall response rate 5.2% vs 4.1%, progression-free survival (PFS) 1.9 vs 3.5 months and clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 6 months 15.2% vs 14.3% were comparable in both groups. To avoid bias due to the potential therapeutic benefit of abiraterone, comparisons were repeated excluding prostate cancer patients with similar results (ORR 4.6% vs 4%, PFS 1.8 vs 3.0 months, CBR at 6 months 13.5% vs 9.5%). Multivariate analysis indicated that the previously identified RMH score (including albumin and lactate dehydrogenase levels) was an accurate predictor of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Phase I clinical trials should be considered in patients with advanced cancers regardless of age, as older patients who enter these have similar safety and efficacy outcomes as their younger counterparts. The RMH prognostic score can assist in the selection of suitable older patients.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: PI3K-AKT-mTOR inhibitors (PAMi) are promising anticancer treatments. Hyperglycaemia is a mechanism-based toxicity of these agents and is becoming increasingly important with their use in larger numbers of patients. METHODS: Retrospective case-control study comparing incidence and severity of hyperglycaemia (all grades) between a case group of 387 patients treated on 18 phase I clinical trials with PAMi (78 patients with PI3Ki, 138 with mTORi, 144 with AKTi and 27 with PI3K/mTORi) and a control group of 109 patients treated on 10 phase I clinical trials with agents not directly targeting the PAM pathway. Diabetic patients were excluded in both groups. RESULTS: The incidence of hyperglycaemia was not significantly different between cases and controls (86.6% vs 80.7%, respectively, P=0.129). However, high grade (grade 3-4) hyperglycaemia was more frequent in the PAMi group than in controls (6.7% vs 0%, respectively, P=0.005). The incidence of grade 3-4 hyperglycaemia was greater with AKT and multikinase inhibitors compared with other PAMi (P<0.001). All patients with high-grade hyperglycaemia received antihyperglycemic treatment and none developed severe metabolic complications (diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar hyperglycemic nonketotic state). High-grade hyperglycaemia was the cause of permanent PAMi discontinuation in nine patients. CONCLUSIONS: PI3K-AKT-mTOR inhibitors are associated with small (6.7%) but statistically significant increased risk of high-grade hyperglycaemia compared with non-PAM targeting agents. However, PAMi-induced hyperglycaemia was not found to be associated with severe metabolic complications in this non-diabetic population of patients with advanced cancers.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Hiperglucemia/epidemiología , Hiperglucemia/etiología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de las Quinasa Fosfoinosítidos-3 , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/antagonistas & inhibidores , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Predictive biomarker development is a key challenge for novel cancer therapeutics. We explored the feasibility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to validate exploratory genomic biomarkers that impact phase I trial selection. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 158 patients with advanced solid tumours referred for phase I clinical trials at the Royal Marsden Hospital (October 2012 to March 2013). After fresh and/or archived tumour tissue were obtained, 93 patients remained candidates for phase I trials. Results from tumour sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq were cross-validated in 27 out of 93 patients on the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (IT-PGM) blinded to results. MiSeq validation with Sequenom MassARRAY OncoCarta 1.0 (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was performed in a separate cohort. RESULTS: We found 97% concordance of mutation calls by MiSeq and IT-PGM at a variant allele frequency ⩾13% and ⩾500 × depth coverage, and 91% concordance between MiSeq and Sequenom. Common 'actionable' mutations involved deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair (51%), RAS-RAF-MEK (35%), Wnt (26%), and PI3K-AKT-mTOR (24%) signalling. Out of 53, 29 (55%) patients participating in phase I trials were recommended based on identified actionable mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted high-coverage NGS panels are a highly feasible single-centre technology well-suited to cross-platform validation, enrichment of trials with molecularly defined populations and hypothesis testing early in drug development.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Neoplasias/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/métodos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare lymphoid neoplasm frequently presenting in the oral cavity. It is an aggressive type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that shares pathological features with plasma cell myeloma. In addition to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), it is also associated with Epstein-Bar virus (EBV) and immunosuppression in HIV-negative patients, for example, post transplantation. Extra-oral PBL is rare and only a few case reports involving the testis have been described. Here we describe the first reported case of PBL presenting with a scrotal abscess (not involving the testes) in a patient newly diagnosed with HIV. This case highlights the rare presentation of a rare disease, the difficulties in establishing a diagnosis and the importance of a timely multidisciplinary approach to its management.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Linfoma Plasmablástico , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Linfoma Plasmablástico/diagnóstico , Linfoma Plasmablástico/etiología , Linfoma Plasmablástico/patología , Absceso/etiología , Absceso/complicaciones , Linfoma no Hodgkin/complicaciones , Boca/patología , Infecciones por VIH/complicacionesRESUMEN
Pekin ducks are exposed to stressors such as heat stress, enteric pathogens, mycotoxins, and other environmental stressors. We know from wild bird literature that birds communicate through vocalizations. We hypothesized that Pekin ducks would have a diverse repertoire that is affected by the sex, social group, and specific stimuli. We utilized adult Pekin ducks to develop a vocal repertoire. We placed 1 to 4 ducks of varying sexes into a sound chamber with various stimuli used to encourage new vocalizations. Birds were recorded for 20 min with several variations of number and sexes of ducks. Once the ducks were recorded each vocalization that was clipped was named based on a predetermined naming system. We characterized the vocal system of the ducks under each stimulus and social treatment in 4 ways: overall call rates, call diversity, call repertoire, and call spectral properties. In all cases, normality of residuals and homogeneity of variances for GLM and ANOVA models were confirmed using Proc Univariate (SAS v9.4) where a p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. We found that Pekin ducks produce up to 16 different vocalizations. The treatments had a significant effect on the overall rate of calls given by the ducks (ANOVA: F6,31 = 8.55, p < 0.0001). Ducks produced the most calls by far when someone was sitting in the chamber with them (30.04 ± 4.45 calls/min). For call diversity, we found that there was a significant main effect of hen number (F218 = 12.21, p = 0.0004) but no main effect of drake number (F3,18 = 3.04, p = 0.0555). Cluster analyses indicated that certain types of calls were given under specific conditions. There were generally 6 major clusters of vocal repertoires (R-square = 0.899, Cubic Clustering Criterion = 9.30). Our results suggest that Pekin ducks are affected by the types of stimuli and social environment in how much they vocalize and in the properties of the calls they use. In addition, males and females differ somewhat in the repertoire of the calls they use, and in the spectral properties of their calls.
Asunto(s)
Patos , Conducta Social , Vocalización Animal , Animales , Femenino , Masculino , Patos/fisiología , Factores Sexuales , Vocalización Animal/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: PF-06952229 is a selective small-molecule inhibitor of transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) receptor 1. We evaluated its antitumor activity in preclinical studies and its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in a phase I study (NCT03685591). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies were conducted. Patients (aged ≥18 years) received PF-06952229 monotherapy [20-500 mg, oral b.i.d., 7 days on/7 days off, 28-day cycles, Part 1A (P1A)] for advanced/metastatic solid tumors and combination therapy [250/375 mg with enzalutamide, Part 1B (P1B)] for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), adverse events (AEs), and laboratory abnormalities. Efficacy, pharmacokinetic parameters, and biomarker modulation were assessed. RESULTS: PF-06952229 showed activity in preclinical murine tumor models including pSMAD2 modulation in tumors. The study (NCT03685591) enrolled 49 patients (P1A, n = 42; P1B, n = 7). DLTs were reported in 3/35 (8.6%) P1A patients receiving PF-06952229 375 mg (anemia, intracranial tumor hemorrhage, and anemia and hypertension, all grade 3, n = 1 each). The most frequent grade 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were alanine aminotransferase increased and anemia (9.5% each). There were no grade 4-5 TRAEs. Plasma PF-06952229 exposures were dose proportional between 80 and 375 mg. Pharmacodynamic studies confirmed target modulation of pSMAD2/3 (peripheral monocytes). One P1A patient with prostate cancer receiving PF-06952229 375 mg monotherapy achieved confirmed partial response (31-month duration of response). A total of 8 patients (P1A, n = 6; P1B, n = 2) achieved stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Antitumor activity of PF-06952229 was observed in preclinical studies. PF-06952229 was generally well tolerated with manageable toxicity; a small group of patients achieved durable responses and/or disease stabilization.
Asunto(s)
Receptor Tipo I de Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Receptor Tipo I de Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/antagonistas & inhibidores , Femenino , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Adulto , Ratones , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel resistance limits durability of response in patients with initial clinical benefit. Overexpression of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) has been proposed as a possible resistance mechanism. This phase I trial evaluated the safety and preliminary activity of the SYK inhibitor TAK-659 combined with paclitaxel in patients with advanced taxane-refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors and prior progression on taxane-based therapy received intravenous infusion of paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 plus oral TAK-659 daily in 28-day cycles. The dose-escalation phase included six cohorts treated at different dose levels; the dose-expansion phase included patients with ovarian cancer treated at the highest dose level. Toxicity was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Efficacy was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: Our study included 49 patients. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached, but higher rates of adverse events were observed at higher dose levels. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were increased aspartate aminotransferase (n = 31; 63%), increased alanine aminotransferase (n = 26; 53%), decreased neutrophil count (n = 26; 53%), and decreased white blood cell count (n = 26; 53%). Most adverse events were either grade 1 or 2. In the 44 patients with evaluable disease, 12 (27%) had stable disease as the best overall response, including three patients with prolonged stable disease, and 4 patients (9%) achieved a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel and TAK-659 showed preliminary activity possibly overcoming resistance to taxane-based therapy as well as a tolerable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/farmacología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Taxoides/farmacología , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Quinasa Syk/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: PM00104 binds guanines at DNA minor grooves, impacting DNA replication and transcription. A phase I study was undertaken to investigate safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics (PKs) and preliminary antitumour activity of PM00104 as a 1- or 3-h infusion three-weekly. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumours received PM00104 in a dose escalation trial, as guided by toxicity and PK data. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were treated; 27 patients on the 1-h schedule (0.23-3.6 mg m(-2)) and 20 patients on the 3-h schedule (1.8-3.5 mg m(-2)). Dose-limiting toxicities comprised reversible nausea, vomiting, fatigue, elevated transaminases and thrombocytopenia, establishing the 1-h schedule RP2D at 3.0 mg m(-2). With the 3-h schedule, DLTs of reversible hypotension and neutropenia established the RP2D at 2.8 mg m(-2). Common PM00104-related adverse events at the RP2D comprised grade 1-2 nausea, fatigue and myelosuppression. In both schedules, PKs increased linearly, but doses over the 1-h schedule RP2D resulted in higher than proportional increases in exposure. A patient with advanced urothelial carcinoma had RECIST shrinkage by 49%, and three patients had RECIST stable disease ≥6 months. CONCLUSION: PM00104 is well tolerated, with preliminary evidence of antitumour activity observed. The 1-h 3-weekly schedule is being assessed in phase II clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/administración & dosificación , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/clasificación , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/farmacocinética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: AT9283 is an inhibitor of aurora kinases A and B with antitumor activity in preclinical models. This a First in Human phase I study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and preliminary efficacy of AT9283. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced tumors received AT9283 as a continuous central venous infusion over 3 days in cohorts of three to six patients starting at 1.5 mg/m(2)/day (equivalent to 4.5 mg/m(2)/72 h). The oral bioavailability of AT9283 was assessed in a cohort of seven patients. Pharmacodynamic analysis of biomarkers included phosphorylation of histone H3 on serine 10, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Ki67, M30 and M65 in skin and plasma. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in all analyses. AT9283 was generally well tolerated with main toxic effects of reversible dose-related myelosuppression, gastrointestinal disturbance, fatigue and alopecia. The dose-limiting toxicity of AT9283 was grade 3 febrile neutropenia in two patients at 36 mg/m(2)/72 h and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established at 27 mg/m(2)/72 h. Systemic exposure was dose proportional. The mean oral bioavailability of a 0.9 mg/m(2) dose was 29.4% (range 11.2%-36.7%). Pharmacodynamic analyses indicated antiproliferative and apoptotic activity of AT9283. Four patients with esophageal, non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 2) and colorectal cancer demonstrated RECIST stable disease ≥ 6 months. CONCLUSION: AT9283 was well tolerated up to the MTD of 27 mg/m(2)/72 h. AT9283 is currently assessed in phase II trials.
Asunto(s)
Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Urea/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/sangre , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Aurora Quinasas , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Bencimidazoles/sangre , Bencimidazoles/farmacocinética , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/sangre , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/patología , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Urea/administración & dosificación , Urea/efectos adversos , Urea/sangre , Urea/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: While gynaecological cancer patients who participate in Phase I clinical trials are not routinely considered for elective surgery because of a short life expectancy, this should not be overlooked in carefully selected responding patients. METHODS/RESULTS: We describe two cases of patients with different gynaecological cancers, who received treatment within separate phase I trials, and who then proceeded to surgical resection of their cancers, resulting in complete remission. CONCLUSION: Surgery, when feasible, should be taken into consideration as a potential management option, even when patients are receiving treatment within a phase I trial.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Papilar/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma Papilar/secundario , Adulto , Afatinib , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundario , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pélvicas/secundario , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patologíaRESUMEN
This systematic review aimed to examine whether the incidence of osteonecrosis differed between patients who have dental extractions before or after radiotherapy (RT). The reported incidence of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaws following RT to the head and neck varies widely in the literature. Currently, for patients with head and neck cancer there are no universally accepted guidelines on the optimal timing of dental surgery relative to RT to minimise incident ORN. A literature review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, Evidence-Based Medicine, and Web of Science databases targeted literature published up to and including 10 April 2020. Two independent reviewers assessed studies for eligibility against inclusion criteria. An assessment of bias was conducted for each of the included studies and relevant data extracted. A meta-analysis was undertaken using the statistical methods described. Twenty-four of 708 studies were included. They were heterogeneous and included a wide variation of RT methods, head and neck malignancies, and comorbidities. While some concluded that the incidence of ORN was dependent on the timing of dental extractions in relation to RT, with regard to the risk of its development, others reported additional factors such as age, comorbidities, extent of surgical resection, and dose and field of radiation, as more important predictors than timing. In many there was consistent lack of detail around the timing of dental procedures in relation to the delivery of RT. From 21 studies including 36,294 patients, of whom 14,389 had extractions before RT, the pooled incidence of ORN was 5.5% (95% CI: 2.1% to 10.1%). Significant heterogeneity was found in Cochran's Q-test (p<0.001) and Higgins I2=98.0%. From 21 studies including 37,805 patients, of whom 6030 had extractions after RT, the pooled incidence of ORN was 5.3% (95% CI: 2.9% to 8.2%). Significant heterogeneity was found in Cochran's Q-test (p<0.001) and Higgins I2=80.0%. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups (random-effects model Q=0.12, p=0.73). Large, longitudinal studies with a priori-specified methods are needed to identify, recruit, and prospectively follow patients with head and neck cancer for the onset of ORN after dental surgery. This will allow clinical guidelines to be established to assist clinicians to plan treatment when extractions are indicated in patients undergoing RT to the head and neck.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Osteorradionecrosis , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Humanos , Incidencia , Cuello , Osteorradionecrosis/epidemiología , Osteorradionecrosis/etiología , Extracción Dental/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This phase Ib trial assessed safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of figitumumab (CP-751,871), a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-IR), in combination with docetaxel. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumours were treated with escalating dose levels of figitumumab plus 75 mg m(-2) docetaxel every 21 days. Safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and biomarker responses were evaluated. RESULTS: In 46 patients, no dose-limiting toxicities were attributable to the treatment combination. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropaenia (n=28), febrile neutropaenia (n=11), fatigue (n=10), leukopaenia (n=7), diarrhoea (n=5), hyperglycaemia, lymphopaenia, cellulitis, DVT, and pain (all n=1). The MTD was not reached. Four partial responses were observed; 12 patients had disease stabilisation of > or =6 months. Pharmacokinetic and biomarker analyses showed a dose-dependent increase in plasma exposure, and complete sIGF-IR downregulation at doses of >or =3 mg kg(-1). Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in combination was similar to when given alone. Out of 18 castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, 10 (56%) had > or =5 circulating tumour cells (CTCs) per 7.5 ml of blood at baseline: 6 out of 10 (60%) had a decline from > or =5 to <5 CTCs and 9 out of 10 (90%) had a > or =30% decline in CTCs after therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Figitumumab and docetaxel in combination are well tolerated. Further evaluation is warranted.