The impact of sarcobesity on incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: Incisional hernia is a common complication after abdominal surgery, especially in obese patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between sarcobesity and incisional hernia development after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: In total, 262 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery were included in the present study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the independent risk factors for the development of incisional hernia. We then performed subgroup analyses to assess the impact of visceral obesity according to clinical variables on the development of incisional hernia in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer surgery. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (16.8%) developed incisional hernias after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. In the univariate analysis, the development of incisional hernia was significantly associated with female sex (P = 0.046), subcutaneous obesity (P = 0.002), visceral obesity (P = 0.002), sarcobesity (P < 0.001), and wound infection (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, sarcobesity (P < 0.001) and wound infection (P < 0.001) were independent predictors of incisional hernia. In subgroup analysis, the odds ratio of visceral obesity was the highest (13.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.51-37.8, P < 0.001) in the subgroup of sarcopenia. CONCLUSION: Sarcobesity may be a strong predictor of the development of incisional hernia after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, suggesting the importance of body composition in the development of incisional hernia.

Association of a newly developed Cancer Cachexia Score with survival in Stage I-III colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Cancer cachexia, a complex multifactorial syndrome associated with sarcopenia, negatively affects the quality of life and survival in patients with several cancers. We aimed to develop a new score for cachexia assessment and evaluate its effectiveness in the classification of patients undergoing radical resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: This study included 396 patients who underwent radical resection for Stage I-III colorectal cancer. To develop the Cancer Cachexia Score (CCS), we analyzed predictive factors of cachexia status related to the development of sarcopenia and incorporated significant factors into the score. We then evaluated the relationship between CCS and survival after radical resection for colorectal cancer. RESULTS: As body mass index (P < 0.001), prognostic nutritional index (P = 0.005), and tumor volume (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with the development of sarcopenia, these factors were included in CCS. Using CCS, 221 (56%), 98 (25%), and 77 (19%) patients were diagnosed with mild, moderate, and severe cancer cachexia, respectively. In multivariate analysis, severe CCS (P < 0.001), N stage 1-2 (P < 0.001), and occurrence of postoperative complications (P = 0.007) were independent predictors of disease-free survival. Age ≥ 65 years (P = 0.009), severe CCS (P < 0.001), and N stage 1-2 (P < 0.001) were independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: CCS may be a useful prognostic factor for predicting poor survival after radical resection in patients with Stage I-III colorectal cancer.