RESUMEN
We aimed to identify an unique host transcriptional signature in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in response to Mycobacterium leprae antigens to distinguish between patients with leprosy and non-leprosy controls for early diagnosis of the disease. Sixteen individuals were enrolled in the discovery cohort [eight patients with leprosy, comprising four multibacillary (MB) and four paucibacillary (PB); and eight non-leprosy controls, comprising four healthy house contacts (HHCs) and four endemic controls (ECs)]. The differences in the transcriptome response of PBMCs to M. leprae sonicate antigen were evaluated between leprosy patients and non-leprosy controls, and 12 differentially expressed genes (CCL2/MCP-1, IL-8, JAKM, ATP, ND1, SERP, FLJ10489, LINC00659, LOC34487, LOC101928143, MIR22, and NCF1C) were identified. The accuracy of the 12 differentially expressed genes was further validated for the diagnosis of leprosy using real-time quantitative PCR in 82 individuals (13 MB, 10 PB, 37 HHCs, and 22 ECs) in the validation cohort. We found that a 5 gene signature set IL-8, CCL2/MCP-1, SERP, LINC00659 and FLJ10489 had a suitable performance in discriminating leprosy from ECs. In addition, elevated expression of IL-8, CCL2/MCP-1, SERP and LINC00659 was associated with MB diagnosis compared with ECs, whereas increased expression of IL-8, CCL2/MCP-1, SERP and FLJ10489 was found to be useful biomarkers for PB diagnosis from ECs. Moreover, we found decreased expression of NCF1C among leprosy patients could distinguish leprosy from HHCs, whereas higher expression of CCL2 among MB than PB could distinguish different leprosy patients. In conclusion, among the 12 candidate host genes identified, a three gene signature IL-8, CCL2/MCP-1, and SERP showed the best performance in distinguishing leprosy patients from healthy controls. These findings may have implications for developing a rapid blood-based test for early diagnosis of leprosy.
Asunto(s)
Lepra , Mycobacterium leprae , Antígenos Bacterianos , Biomarcadores , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Lepra/diagnóstico , Leucocitos Mononucleares , Mycobacterium leprae/genética , TranscriptomaRESUMEN
Introduction. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have been responsible for nosocomial outbreaks worldwide and have become endemic in several countries.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. To better understand the epidemiological trends and characteristics of CRE in the Henan province.Aim. We assessed the molecular epidemiological characteristics of 305 CRE strains isolated from patients in 19 secondary or tertiary hospitals in ten areas of the Henan province in China.Methodology. A total of 305 CRE isolates were subjected to multiple tests, including in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing, PCR for carbapenemase genes bla KPC, bla NDM, bla IMP, bla VIM, bla OXA-48-like. Tigecycline-resistant genes ramR, oqxR, acrR, tetA, rpsJ, tetX, tetM, tetL were analysed in five tigecycline non-susceptible carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (TNSCRKP). Additionally, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP).Results. The most common CRE species were K. pneumoniae (234, 77â%), Escherichia coli (36, 12â%) and Enterobacter cloacae (13, 4â%). All strains exhibited multi-drug resistance. Overall, 97â% (295/305) and 97â% (297/305) of the isolates were susceptible to polymyxin B and tigecycline, respectively. A total of 89â% (271/305) of the CRE isolates were carbapenemase gene-positive, including 70â% bla KPC, 13â% bla NDM, 6â% bla IMP, and 1â% combined bla KPC/bla NDM genes. K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) was the predominant carbapenemase in K. pneumoniae (87â%), whereas NDM and IMP were frequent in E. coli (53â%) and E. cloacae (69â%), respectively. Mutations in the ramR, tetA, and rpsJ genes were detected in five TNSCRKP. Moreover, 15 unique sequence types were detected, with ST11 (74â%), ST15 (9â%) and ST2237 (5â%) being dominant among K. pneumoniae strains.Conclusion. A high proportion of CRE strains were carbapenemase-positive, and five carbapenem-resistant K. pneumonia isolates were tigecycline non-susceptible, indicating a need for the ongoing surveillance of CRE and effective measures for the prevention of CRE infections.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/genética , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Tigeciclina/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/clasificación , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/aislamiento & purificación , China/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/genética , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Genotipo , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Mutación , beta-Lactamasas/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Leprosy, caused by Mycobacterium leprae, affects over 200,000 people annually worldwide and remains endemic in the ethnically diverse, mountainous and underdeveloped southwestern provinces of China. Delayed diagnosis of leprosy persists in China, thus, additional knowledge to support early diagnosis, especially early diagnosis of paucibacillary (PB) patients, based on the host immune responses induced by specific M. leprae antigens is needed. The current study aimed to investigate leprosy patients and controls in Southwest China by comparing supernatants after stimulation with specific M. leprae antigens in an overnight whole-blood assay (WBA) to determine whether host markers induced by specific M. leprae antigens improve the diagnosis or discrimination of PB patients with leprosy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Leprosy patients [13 multibacillary (MB) patients and 7 PB patients] and nonleprosy controls [21 healthy household contacts (HHCs), 20 endemic controls (ECs) and 19 tuberculosis (TB) patients] were enrolled in this study. The supernatant levels of ten host markers stimulated by specific M. leprae antigens were evaluated by overnight WBA and multiplex Luminex assays. The diagnostic value in PB patients and ECs and the discriminatory value between PB patients and HHCs or TB patients were evaluated by receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis. ML2044-stimulated CXCL8/IL-8 achieved the highest sensitivity of 100%, with a specificity of 73.68%, for PB diagnosis. Compared to single markers, a 3-marker combination model that included ML2044-induced CXCL8/IL-8, CCL4/MIP-1 beta, and IL-6 improved the diagnostic specificity to 94.7% for PB patients. ML2044-stimulated IL-4 and CXCL8/IL-8 achieved the highest sensitivity (85.71% and 100%) and the highest specificity (95.24% and 84.21%) for discriminating PB patients from HHCs and TB patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the host markers induced by specific M. leprae antigens in an overnight WBA increase diagnostic and discriminatory value in PB patients with leprosy, with a particularly strong association with interleukin 8.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/inmunología , Sangre/inmunología , Inmunidad Innata , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Lepra Paucibacilar/diagnóstico , Lepra Paucibacilar/inmunología , Mycobacterium leprae/inmunología , Adulto , China , Citocinas/análisis , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Curva ROC , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate antigen-specific immune responses for leprosy diagnosis in a hyperendemic area in China. METHODS: Eighty-three leprosy patients and 161 non-leprosy controls were enrolled from Hani-yi Autonomous Prefecture of Honghe, Yunnan Province, China. Leprosy patients were divided into multibacillary (MB, n = 38), paucibacillary (PB, n = 23), and post-multi-drug therapy (MDT, n = 22) groups. Controls were divided into the following groups: healthy household contacts (HHC, n = 119), tuberculosis (TB, n = 11), and endemic controls (EC, n = 31). The NDO-LID Rapid Test, M. leprae antigen-specific ELISA and antigen-specific IFN-γ secretion in a whole blood assay (WBA) were used to evaluate these subjects. RESULTS: The NDO-LID Rapid Test achieved higher positive response rates in MB than in PB patients[94.7%(36/38) vs 65.2%(15/23)], and these rates were higher than those observed by ELISA using anti-LID-1[92.1%(35/38) vs 52.2%(12/23)], anti-NDO-LID[92.1%(35/38) vs 47.8% (11/23)], and anti-ND-O-BSA[89.5%(34/38) vs 60.9%(14/23)]. However, the NDO-LID Rapid Test also showed a higher positive response rate in the EC group (33.3%,10/31), which was higher than the rates observed for anti-NDO-LID (12.9%,4/31) and anti-ND-O-BSA (16.1%,5/31). M. leprae antigen-specific ELISA demonstrated relatively high specificity (86.84-97.37%) but low sensitivity (15.97-72.73%) in discriminating between leprosy patients and non-leprosy controls by ROC curve analysis. In contrast, M. leprae antigen-specific IFN-γ secretion detection achieved higher positive response rates in PB than in MB patients (positive ratio of MB vs PB: 40% vs 56% for LID-1, 28.6% vs 47.8% for ML89, 31.4% vs 60.7% for ML2044, and 31.4 vs 47.8% for ML2028) and could distinguish MB from EC when stimulated with ML89(AUC = 0.6664) and PB fromTB when stimulated with ML2044 and ML2028(AUC = 0.7549 and 0.7372, respectively). CONCLUSION: The NDO-LID Rapid Test and M. leprae antigen-specific ELISA are useful tools to assist in the diagnosis of leprosy patients, especially MB patients, although the former had higher sensitivity but lower specificity than the latter. M. leprae antigen-specific IFN-γ release assessed by WBA has diagnostic value for distinguishing PB from TB but not for distinguishing PB from HHC or EC. Screening novel M. leprae-specific antigens, combining different M. leprae antigens and a multi-cytokine analyte model may be needed for more effective diagnosis of leprosy.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/análisis , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Ensayos de Liberación de Interferón gamma/métodos , Lepra/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , China , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Leprosy is the disabling outcome of chronic infection with Mycobacterium leprae. The disease often evades early detection, particularly now that fewer clinicians are able to confidently diagnose the disease following the integration of leprosy control measures within general health services in many countries. Although leprosy is officially eliminated in China, endemic regions remain in some difficult-to-reach, underdeveloped areas in Southwest China. In order to better understand the extent of M. leprae infection and identify new leprosy cases in a timely manner, simple tools that can detect infection and the early disease are required. In this report we evaluated the performance of antigen-specific ELISA, the NDO-LID rapid diagnostic test, and antigen-specific whole blood assays (WBA) as potential diagnostic tools. Our data support the use of antibody detection tests and WBA to facilitate the diagnosis of multibacillary and paucibacillary leprosy, respectively. These tools could be invaluable for increased, but simplified, monitoring of individuals in order to provide referrals for clinical exam and early leprosy diagnosis.