Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 45(5): 2417-2422, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34075462

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety profile of liquid phase concentrated growth factor (LPCGF) in promoting autologous fat graft survival. METHODS: LPCGF/PRP was mixed with human fat tissues at different proportions and transplanted into nude mice. Three months after transplantation, the implanted fat tissues were retrieved for analysis. H&E staining was used to quantify the neovascularization. Immunohistochemical staining was applied to quantify the CD34-positive stem cells and the fluorescence intensity of VEGF and TGF-ß. RESULTS: Addition of LPCGF to autologous fat reduced the fat absorption by 5-15%, especially at the early stage, and no complications were observed. In addition, the effect was improved with increased CGF. Liquid phase concentrated growth factor improves autologous fat graft survival, and the most suitable ratio of LPCGF/fat is 1:8. CONCLUSION: LPCGF is rich in VEGF, TGF-ß and CD34-positive stem cells, which can improve the fat transplantation effect, but the specific influence of a single component requires future evaluation. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Asunto(s)
Tejido Adiposo , Supervivencia de Injerto , Animales , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intercelular , Ratones , Ratones Desnudos , Trasplante Autólogo
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(8): e760-e763, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31348198

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frequency of pneumothorax following orthognathic surgery and describe its clinical presentation. A retrospective analysis of a hospital database was carried out on consecutive patients with normal presurgical clinical assessment, laboratory findings, and chest X-ray who underwent orthognathic surgery from January 2007 to September 2018 in the Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Two patients (0.038%), 1 male (age 20 years) and 1 female (age 32 years), complained of respiratory difficulty and chest pain and were clearly diagnosed with postoperative pneumothorax by radiographic chest X-rays from a sample of 5229 consecutive patients during the study period. Intercostal drainage under local anesthesia was performed immediately and the treatment effects for both patients were satisfactory. The present study findings indicate that although orthognathic surgeries can be safely performed in patients with craniofacial anomalies, some unexpected complications such as pneumothorax may occur. Therefore, accurate postoperative follow-up must be done in every patient to monitor possible clinical complications. Patients who experience respiratory difficulty and postoperative chest pain may have pneumothorax, and once it is diagnosed, treatment should be promptly carried out to eliminate further severe sequelae.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Ortognática , Neumotórax/cirugía , Adulto , Anestesia Local/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Incidencia , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio , Neumotórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumotórax/epidemiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol ; 9: 591796, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33644012

RESUMEN

Implant-supported dentures are widely used in patients with defect or loss of dentition because these have higher chewing efficiency and do not damage the adjacent teeth compared with fixed or removable denture. An implant-supported denture carries the risk of failure in some systemic diseases, including osteoporosis, because of a non-ideal local microenvironment. Clinically common physical and chemical modifications are used to change the roughness of the implant surface to promote osseointegration, but they have limitations in promoting osteoinduction and inhibiting bone resorption. Recently, many researchers have focused on the study of bioactive modification of implants and have achieved promising results. Herein we have summarized the progress in bioactive modification strategy to promote osseointegration by regulating the local osteoporotic microenvironment.

4.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 148(5): 1101-1110, 2021 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705785

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The maxilla position is essential for the aesthetic and functional outcomes of orthognathic surgery. Previous studies demonstrated the advantages of patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery. However, more data are needed to confirm the superiority of patient-specific implants over surgical splints created with computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM). This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the accuracy of patient-specific implants and CAD/CAM splints for maxilla repositioning in orthognathic surgery. METHODS: Patients (n = 64) who required orthognathic surgery were randomly assigned to use either patient-specific implants (patient-specific implant group) or CAD/CAM surgical splints (splint group) to reposition the maxilla. The outcome evaluation was completed by comparing virtual plans with actual results. The primary outcome was the discrepancies of the centroid position of the maxilla. Other translation and orientation discrepancies of the maxilla were also assessed. RESULTS: The authors analyzed 27 patients in the patient-specific implant group and 31 in the splint group. The maxilla position discrepancy was 1.41 ± 0.58 mm in the patient-specific implant group and 2.20 ± 0.94 mm in the splint group; the between-group difference was significant (p < 0.001). For the patient-specific implant group, the largest translation discrepancy was 1.02 ± 0.66 mm in the anteroposterior direction, and the largest orientation discrepancy was 1.85 ± 1.42 degrees in pitch. For the splint group, the largest translation discrepancy was 1.23 ± 0.93 mm in the mediolateral direction, and the largest orientation discrepancy was 1.72 ± 1.56 degrees in pitch. CONCLUSION: The result showed that using patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery resulted in a more accurate maxilla position than CAD/CAM surgical splints. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.


Asunto(s)
Diseño Asistido por Computadora , Diseño de Equipo/métodos , Maloclusión/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos/instrumentación , Férulas (Fijadores) , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Masculino , Maloclusión/diagnóstico , Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Maxilar/cirugía , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda