RESUMEN
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To determine the prevalence of urolithiasis in young children fed infant formula (IF) contaminated with melamine, and the association between IF consumption and urolithiasis.</p><p><b>DESIGN</b>A total of 2 733 children < or = 3 years of age on September 1, 2008 in two townships of Gansu Province, China were studied. Cases of urolithiasis were diagnosed by ultrasonography. Milk product consumption was determined by their caregivers. Remaining IF samples were tested for melamine and cyanuric acid.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of 2 733 eligible children in the two townships, 2 186 (80%) were enrolled in our study. Overall, 16.6% (362) of 2 186 children had urolithiasis. The prevalence was 24.6% in children exclusively fed Sanlu brand IF, 9.7% in those fed other IF, and 8.5% in those fed exclusively on other milk products. For children exclusively breast-fed, no urolithiasis was found (P < 0.05). The prevalence of urolithiasis was 11.4% in children fed 400 g of Sanlu IF, rising to 37.5% in children fed over 25 600 g. Of 48 Sanlu IF samples, 91.7% contained melamine (median = 1 800 ppm; range = 45-4 700) and 66.7% contained cyanuric acid (median = 1.2 ppm; range = 0.4-6.3). Melamine was also detected in 22.2% of 36 other brand IF (median = 27.5 ppm, range = 4-50).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Urolithiasis was associated with melamine-contaminated IF. Although one product caused most morbidity, other milk products may have also contributed to the outbreak.</p>
Asunto(s)
Preescolar , Humanos , Recolección de Datos , Contaminación de Alimentos , Alimentos Infantiles , Triazinas , Toxicidad , UrolitiasisRESUMEN
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>A new simple RT-LAMP method was applied to detect measles virus nucleic acid and compared with nest-RT-PCR.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Compare the detection rate of the RT-LAMP method with that of nest-RT-PCR by detecting measles virus nucleic acid from measles virus and clinical samples.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The nucleic acid positive rates of all 23 strains of measles virus are all 100% by the two methods. But to the detection of 18 clinical samples which are negative in measles isolation, the nest-RT-LAMP showed 56.52% positive rate of nucleic acid of measles virus and nest-RT-PCR showed 47.83%.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>RT-LAMP is more sensitive than nest-RT-PCR.</p>