Dietician-delivered intensive nutritional support is associated with a decrease in severe postoperative complications after surgery in patients with esophageal cancer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietician-delivered intensive nutritional support (INS) on postoperative outcome in patients with esophageal cancer. Approximately 50-80% of patients with esophageal cancer are malnourished at the time of diagnosis. Malnutrition enhances the risk of postoperative complications, resulting in delay of postoperative recovery and impairment of quality of life. Sixty-five patients with esophageal cancer were included. All patients who received surgery (n = 28) in the time frame between March 2009 and April 2010, the first year after the start of INS, were included in the INS intervention group. The control group (n = 37) consisted of patients who received surgery during the 3 years before the start of INS. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare differences in severity of postoperative complications using the Dindo classification. Linear regression was applied to evaluate differences in preoperative weight change. The adjusted odds ratio for developing serious complications after surgery of INS compared with the control group was 0.23 (95% confidence interval: 0.053-0.97; P = 0.045). Benefit was mainly observed in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy (n = 35). The INS program furthermore resulted in a relative preoperative weight gain in comparison with the control group of +4.8% (P = 0.009, adjusted) in these neoadjuvant-treated patients. This study shows that dietician-delivered INS preserves preoperative weight and decreases severe postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer.

Description of a novel grading system to assess the quality of bowel preparation in video capsule endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Inadequate bowel preparation negatively influences the reliability of examinations by video capsule endoscopy (VCE). Currently, only subjective scales are available to describe mucosal visibility. We aimed to design a score that was derived directly from the VCE images. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A computed assessment of cleansing score was developed based on color intensities of the tissue color bar. The feasibility of this score was retrospectively tested in 24 VCE studies. A prospective study was conducted using 40 VCE segments from 10 consecutive VCE studies. The computed scores were compared with three existing methods of assessing small-intestinal cleansing. Correlations between the existing scoring systems and the computed score were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Spearman's rho correlation. RESULTS: All computed measurements were obtained twice and resulted in exactly the same results. Both overall and segmental mucosal visibility could be assessed. The computed score and the 10-point quantitative index were significantly associated for both readers (Spearman's rho: 0.68 and 0.75, respectively; P < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the 4-point qualitative evaluation and the computed score was 0.67 for reader 1 and 0.64 for reader 2. For reader 1, the mean computed score for segments assessed as either inadequately or adequately cleansed was 5.0 and 6.4 ( P = 0.001). For reader 2 these values were 4.0 and 6.3, respectively ( P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A computed assessment of small-bowel mucosal visibility based on the ratio of color intensities of the red and green channel of the tissue color bar is feasible and more reproducible than existing subjective scales. Such a computed scale could be integrated into VCE reading software. For this novel scoring system we propose the term Computed Assessment of Cleansing (CAC) score.

Prevention of feeding tube dislodgement with the Wiesbaden rein: a case series.

We describe initial experience with the use of a new fixation method (Wiesbaden rein), which has been developed to prevent dislodgement of feeding tubes in the gastrointestinal tract. The Wiesbaden rein has been used in three patients without complication. In none of the patients was dislodgement or malfunction of the feeding tube observed. Therefore, the use of the Wiesbaden rein might prevent dislodgement of feeding tubes. Clinical trials are required before this new method can be recommended for general use.

"Dry biopsies" with spraying of dilute epinephrine optimize biopsy mapping of long segment Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: For surveillance of Barrett's esophagus random stepwise four-quadrant biopsy (4QB) is recommended for detecting macroscopically occult neoplasias. Thorough performance of the systematic protocol is commonly hampered by poor visibility due to oozing from biopsy sites. Topical application of dilute epinephrine may prevent bleeding by vasoconstriction of superficial microvessels and might therefore enable "dry biopsy" sampling. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of spraying dilute epinephrine for optimal 4QB mapping of Barrett's esophagus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind trial 40 patients with known long segment Barrett's esophagus were randomly allocated to undergo spraying with either dilute epinephrine (1 : 20 000) (epinephrine group; n = 20) or saline (control group; n = 20) before 4QB sampling. During endoscopies patients received continuous monitoring of vital parameters. Endoscopists blinded to randomization assessed visibility scores during biopsy sampling. Additionally, electronically stored images of the Barrett's esophagus segment after 4QB sampling were evaluated by blinded assessors. RESULTS: The mean length of Barrett's segments was 5.5 +/- 1.8 cm and the mean number of 4QBs was 12.5 +/- 3.6 with no statistically significant differences between control and epinephrine groups. Epinephrine spraying did not affect patients' vital parameters. Visualization ratings by endoscopists on site and by the assessors of the stored images were significantly better in the epinephrine compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Moreover, epinephrine spraying reduced the time for 4QB sampling (P = 0.015) and the mean number of saline flushes needed to maintain visibility (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: The novel "dry biopsy" technique with spraying of dilute epinephrine is safe, and facilitates thorough performance of systematic 4QB mapping of Barrett's esophagus by improvement of visibility.