Potentially Life-Threatening Interaction between Opioids and Intrathecal Baclofen in Individuals with a Childhood-Onset Neurological Disorder: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Spasticity and dystonia are movement impairments that can occur in childhood-onset neurological disorders. Severely affected individuals can be treated with intrathecal baclofen (ITB). Concomitant use of ITB and opioids has been associated with central nervous system (CNS) depression. This study aims to describe the clinical management of this interaction, based on a case series and review of literature. METHODS: Four individuals with childhood-onset CNS disorders (age 8-24) and CNS-depressant overdose symptoms after the concomitant use of ITB and opioids are described. The Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS) was calculated to assess the cause-relationship (doubtful <2, possible 2-4, probable 5-8, and highly probable >8) of the potential drug-drug interaction. A literature review of similar previously reported cases and the possible pharmacological mechanisms of opioid-baclofen interaction is provided. RESULTS: After ITB and opioid co-administration, three out of four patients had decreased consciousness, and three developed respiratory depression. DIPS scores indicated a possible cause-relationship in one patient (DIPS: 4) and a probable cause-relationship in the others (DIPS: 6, 6, and 8). Discontinuation or adjusting ITB or opioid dosages resulted in clinical recovery. All patients recovered completely. In the literature, two articles describing nine unique cases were found. CONCLUSION: Although the opioid-ITB interaction is incompletely understood, concomitant use may enhance the risk of symptoms of CNS-depressant overdose, which are potentially life-threatening. If concomitant use is desirable, we strongly recommend to closely monitor these patients to detect interaction symptoms early. Awareness and monitoring of the potential opioid-ITB interaction is essential to reduce the risk of severe complications.

Dyskinetic crisis in GNAO1-related disorders: clinical perspectives and management strategies.

Background: GNAO1-related disorders (GNAO1-RD) encompass a diverse spectrum of neurodevelopmental and movement disorders arising from variants in the GNAO1 gene. Dyskinetic crises, marked by sudden and intense exacerbations of abnormal involuntary movements, present a significant challenge in GNAO1-RD. Objectives: This study aimed to establish a standardized framework for understanding dyskinetic crises, addressing crucial aspects such as definition, triggers, diagnostic criteria, complications, and management strategies. Methods: A Delphi consensus process was conducted involving international experts in GNAO1-RD. The panel of thirteen experts participated in three voting rounds, discussing 90 statements generated through a literature review and clinical expertise. Results: Consensus was achieved on 31 statements, defining dyskinetic crises as abrupt, paroxysmal episodes involving distinct abnormal movements in multiple body regions, triggered by emotional stress or infections. Dyskinetic crises may lead to functional impairment and complications, emphasizing the need for prompt recognition. While individualized pharmacological recommendations were not provided, benzodiazepines and clonidine were suggested for acute crisis management. Chronic treatment options included tetrabenazine, benzodiazepines, gabapentin, and clonidine. Deep brain stimulation should be considered early in the treatment of refractory or prolonged dyskinetic crisis. Conclusion: This consensus provides a foundation for understanding and managing dyskinetic crises in GNAO1-RD for clinicians, caregivers, and researchers. The study emphasizes the importance of targeted parental and caregiver education, which enables early recognition and intervention, thereby potentially minimizing both short- and long-term complications. Future research should concentrate on differentiating dyskinetic crises from other neurological events and investigating potential risk factors that influence their occurrence and nature. The proposed standardized framework improves clinical management, stakeholder communication, and future GNAO1-RD research.

Brain MRI Injury Patterns across Gestational Age among Preterm Infants with Perinatal Asphyxia.

INTRODUCTION: Brain injury patterns of preterm infants with perinatal asphyxia (PA) are underreported. We aimed to explore brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and associated neurodevelopmental outcomes in these newborns. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study included infants with gestational age (GA) 24.0­36.0 weeks and PA, defined as ≥2 of the following: (1) umbilical cord pH ≤7.0, (2) 5-min Apgar score ≤5, and (3) fetal distress or systemic effects of PA. Findings were compared between GA <28.0 (group 1), 28.0­31.9 (group 2), and 32.0­36.0 weeks (group 3). Early MRI (<36 weeks postmenstrual age or <10 postnatal days) was categorized according to predominant injury pattern, and MRI around term-equivalent age (TEA, 36.0­44.0 weeks and ≥10 postnatal days) using the Kidokoro score. Adverse outcomes included death, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, severe hearing/visual impairment, or neurodevelopment <-1 SD at 18­24 months corrected age. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen infants with early MRI (n = 94) and/or MRI around TEA (n = 66) were included. Early MRI showed predominantly hemorrhagic injury in groups 1 (56%) and 2 (45%), and white matter (WM)/watershed injury in group 3 (43%). Around TEA, WM scores were highest in groups 2 and 3. Deep gray matter (DGM) (aOR 15.0, 95% CI: 3.8-58.9) and hemorrhagic injury on early MRI (aOR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.3-4.6) and Kidokoro WM (aOR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0-1.6) and DGM sub-scores (aOR 4.8, 95% CI: 1.1-21.7) around TEA were associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. CONCLUSION: The brain injury patterns following PA in preterm infants differ across GA. Particularly DGM abnormalities are associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Improving paediatric movement disorders care: Insights on rating scales utilization and clinical practice.

AIM: This exploratory study evaluates rating scale usage by experts from the European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND) for paediatric MD, considering factors like diagnosis, intellectual disability, age, and transition to adult care. The aim is to propose a preliminary framework for consistent application. METHODS: A multicentre survey among 25 ERN-RND experts from 10 European countries examined rating scale usage in paediatric MD, categorizing MD into acute, non-progressive, and neurodegenerative types. Factors influencing scale choice and the transition to adult care practices were analysed. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify the earliest age of application of these scales in paediatric patients. RESULTS: The study identifies various rating scales and establishes their usage frequencies for different MDs. Experts highlighted the need for standardized scales and proposed preliminary evaluation strategies based on clinical contexts. Challenges in applying scales to young, non-cooperative patients were acknowledged. INTERPRETATION: The study recommends developing standardized rating scales for paediatric MDs to improve evaluations and data collection. It suggests potential scales for specific clinical scenarios to better evaluate disease progression. Comprehensive, patient-centred care remains crucial during the transition to adult care, despite the identified challenges. This exploratory approach aims to enhance patient outcomes and care.