Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 71
Filtrar
1.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 90(1): 176-188, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37596793

RESUMEN

AIMS: Pregnancy after kidney transplantation is realistic but immunosuppressants should be continued to prevent rejection. Tacrolimus is safe during pregnancy and is routinely dosed based on whole-blood predose concentrations. However, maintaining these concentrations is complicated as physiological changes during pregnancy affect tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. The aim of this study was to describe tacrolimus pharmacokinetics throughout pregnancy and explain the changes by investigating covariates in a population pharmacokinetic model. METHODS: Data of pregnant women using a twice-daily tacrolimus formulation following kidney transplantation were retrospectively collected from 6 months before conception, throughout gestation and up to 6 months postpartum. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Demographic, clinical and genetic parameters were evaluated as covariates. The final model was evaluated using goodness-of-fit plots, visual predictive checks and a bootstrap analysis. RESULTS: A total of 260 whole-blood tacrolimus predose concentrations from 14 pregnant kidney transplant recipients were included. Clearance increased during pregnancy from 34.5 to 41.7 L/h, by 15, 19 and 21% in the first, second and third trimester, respectively, compared to prior to pregnancy. This indicates a required increase in the tacrolimus dose by the same percentage to maintain the prepregnancy concentration. Haematocrit and gestational age were negatively correlated with tacrolimus clearance (P ≤ 0.01), explaining 18% of interindividual and 85% of interoccasion variability in oral clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus clearance increases during pregnancy, resulting in decreased exposure to tacrolimus, which is explained by gestational age and haematocrit. To maintain prepregnancy target whole-blood tacrolimus predose concentrations during pregnancy, increasing the dose is required.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Tacrolimus , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Tacrolimus/farmacocinética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/farmacocinética , Tasa de Depuración Metabólica , Modelos Biológicos , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/metabolismo
2.
Kidney Int ; 104(3): 552-561, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37343659

RESUMEN

The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) has expedited the chance for elderly patients with kidney failure to receive a timely transplant. This current study evaluated survival parameters of kidneys donated after brain death with or without matching for HLA-DR antigens. This cohort study evaluated the period within ESP with paired allocation of 675 kidneys from donors 65 years and older to transplant candidates 65 years and older, the first kidney to 341 patients within the Eurotransplant Senior DR-compatible Program and 334 contralateral kidneys without (ESP) HLA-DR antigen matching. We used Kaplan-Meier estimates and competing risk analysis to assess all cause mortality and kidney graft failure, respectively. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression were used for comparisons. Within ESP, matching for HLA-DR antigens was associated with a significantly lower five-year risk of mortality (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95) and significantly lower cause-specific hazards for kidney graft failure and return to dialysis at one year (0.55; 0.35-0.87) and five years (0.73; 0.53-0.99) post-transplant. Allocation based on HLA-DR matching resulted in longer cold ischemia (mean difference 1.00 hours; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-1.68) and kidney offers with a significantly shorter median dialysis vintage of 2.4 versus 4.1 yrs. in ESP without matching. Thus, our allocation based on HLA-DR matching improved five-year patient and kidney allograft survival. Hence, our paired allocation study suggests a superior outcome of HLA-DR matching in the context of old-for-old kidney transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Anciano , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Antígenos HLA-DR , Riñón , Donantes de Tejidos , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Supervivencia de Injerto
3.
Transpl Int ; 36: 11052, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37234219

RESUMEN

Pregnancy after kidney transplantation (KT) conveys risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO). Little is known about performance of pre-pregnancy counselling after KT. This study investigated perceptions of risk, attitudes towards pregnancy and factors influencing advice given at pre-pregnancy counselling after KT. A web-based vignette survey was conducted among nephrologists and gynaecologists between March 2020 and March 2021, consisting of five vignettes containing known risk factors for APO and general questions on pre-pregnancy counselling after KT. Per vignette, attitudes towards pregnancy and estimation of outcomes were examined. In total 52 nephrologists and 25 gynaecologists participated, 56% from university hospitals. One third had no experience with pregnancy after KT. All gave positive pregnancy advice in the vignette with ideal circumstances (V1), versus 83% in V2 (proteinuria), 81% in V3 (hypertension), 71% in V4 (eGFR 40 ml/min/1.73 m2). Only 2% was positive in V5 (worst-case scenario). Chance of preeclampsia was underestimated by 89% in V1. 63% and 98% overestimated risk for graft loss in V4 and V5. Professionals often incorrectly estimated risk of APO after KT. As experience with pregnancy after KT was limited among professionals, patients should be referred to specialised centres for multidisciplinary pre-pregnancy counselling to build experience and increase consistency in given advice.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Consejo , Factores de Riesgo , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos
4.
Transpl Int ; 36: 10959, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36925946

RESUMEN

The Netherlands was the first European country to implement unspecified kidney donation in 2000. This qualitative study aimed to evaluate the experiences of unspecified kidney donors (UKDs) in our transplant institute to improve the care for this valuable group of donors. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 106 UKDs who donated between 2000-2016 (response rate 84%). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and independently coded by 2 researchers in NVivo using thematic analysis. The following 14 themes reflecting donor experiences were found: Satisfaction with donation; Support from social network; Interpersonal stress; Complaints about hospital care; Uncertainty about donor approval; Life on hold between approval and actual donation; Donation requires perseverance and commitment; Recovery took longer than expected; Normalization of the donation; Becoming an advocate for living kidney donation; Satisfaction with anonymity; Ongoing curiosity about outcome or recipient; Importance of anonymous communication; Anonymity is not watertight. The data reinforced that unspecified kidney donation is a positive experience for donors and that they were generally satisfied with the procedures. Most important complaints about the procedure concerned the length of the assessment procedure and the lack of acknowledgment for UKDs from both their recipients and health professionals. Suggestions are made to address the needs of UKDs.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Riñón , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos , Investigación Cualitativa
5.
Transpl Int ; 36: 10647, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36756277

RESUMEN

Aorto-iliac calcification (AIC) is a well-studied risk factor for post-transplant cardiovascular events and mortality. Its effect on graft function remains unknown. The primary aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the association between AIC and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the first year post-transplant. Eligibility criteria were: ≥50 years of age or ≥30 years with at least one risk factor for vascular disease. A non-contrast-enhanced CT-scan was performed with quantification of AIC using the modified Agatston score. The association between AIC and eGFR was investigated with a linear mixed model adjusted for predefined variables. One-hundred-and-forty patients were included with a median of 31 (interquartile range 26-39) eGFR measurements per patient. No direct association between AIC and eGFR was found. We observed a significant interaction between follow-up time and ipsilateral AIC, indicating that patients with higher AIC scores had lower eGFR trajectory over time starting 100 days after transplant (p = 0.014). To conclude, severe AIC is not directly associated with lower post-transplant eGFR. The significant interaction indicates that patients with more severe AIC have a lower eGFR trajectory after 100 days in the first year post-transplant.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Adulto , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Transpl Int ; 36: 11181, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37448449

RESUMEN

For counseling it is important to know if pregnancy after Living Kidney Donation (LKD) affects long-term outcomes of the mono-kidney and the mother. Therefore, we performed a retrospective multicenter study in women ≤45 years who donated their kidney between 1981 and 2017. Data was collected via questionnaires and medical records. eGFR of women with post-LKD pregnancies were compared to women with pre-LKD pregnancies or nulliparous. eGFR before and after pregnancy were compared in women with post-LKD pregnancies. Pregnancy outcomes post-LKD were compared with pre-LKD pregnancy outcomes. 234 women (499 pregnancies) were included, of which 20 with pre- and post-LKD pregnancies (68) and 26 with only post-LKD pregnancies (59). Multilevel analysis demonstrated that eGFR was not different between women with and without post-LKD pregnancies (p = 0.23). Furthermore, eGFR was not different before and after post-LKD pregnancy (p = 0.13). More hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) occurred in post-LKD pregnancies (p = 0.002). Adverse fetal outcomes did not differ. We conclude that, despite a higher incidence of HDP, eGFR was not affected by post-LKD pregnancy. In line with previous studies, we found an increased risk for HDP after LKD without affecting fetal outcome. Therefore, a pregnancy wish alone should not be a reason to exclude women for LKD.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Riñón , Donadores Vivos/psicología , Resultado del Embarazo , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos
7.
Transpl Int ; 36: 11112, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37342179

RESUMEN

Computerized integration of alternative transplantation programs (CIAT) is a kidney-exchange program that allows AB0- and/or HLA-incompatible allocation to difficult-to-match patients, thereby increasing their chances. Altruistic donors make this available for waiting list patients as well. Strict criteria were defined for selected highly-immunized (sHI) and long waiting (LW) candidates. For LW patients AB0i allocation was allowed. sHI patients were given priority and AB0i and/or CDC cross-match negative HLAi allocations were allowed. A local pilot was established between 2017 and 2022. CIAT results were assessed against all other transplant programs available. In the period studied there were 131 incompatible couples; CIAT transplanted the highest number of couples (35%), compared to the other programs. There were 55 sHI patients; CIAT transplanted as many sHI patients as the Acceptable Mismatch program (18%); Other programs contributed less. There were 69 LW patients; 53% received deceased donor transplantations, 20% were transplanted via CIAT. In total, 72 CIAT transplants were performed: 66 compatible, 5 AB0i and 1 both AB0i and HLAi. CIAT increased opportunities for difficult-to-match patients, not by increasing pool size, but through prioritization and allowing AB0i and "low risk" HLAi allocation. CIAT is a powerful addition to the limited number of programs available for difficult-to-match patients.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Donadores Vivos , Riñón
8.
Kidney Int ; 102(4): 866-875, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35777440

RESUMEN

Although numbers of pregnancy after kidney transplantation (KT) are rising, high risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) remain. Though important for pre-conception counselling and pregnancy monitoring, analyses of pregnancy outcomes after KT per pre-pregnancy estimated glomerular filtration rate-chronic kidney disease (eGFR-CKD)-categories have not been performed on a large scale before. To do this, we conducted a Dutch nationwide cohort study of consecutive singleton pregnancies over 20 weeks of gestation after KT. Outcomes were analyzed per pre-pregnancy eGFR-CKD category and a composite APO (cAPO) was established including birth weight under 2500 gram, preterm birth under 37 weeks, third trimester severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure over 160 and/or diastolic blood pressure over 110 mm Hg) and/or over 15% increase in serum creatinine during pregnancy. Risk factors for cAPO were analyzed in a multilevel model after multiple imputation of missing predictor values. In total, 288 pregnancies in 192 women were included. Total live birth was 93%, mean gestational age 35.6 weeks and mean birth weight 2383 gram. Independent risk factors for cAPO were pre-pregnancy eGFR, midterm percentage serum creatinine dip and midterm mean arterial pressure dip; odds ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.96-0.99), 0.95 (0.93-0.98) and 0.94 (0.90-0.98), respectively. The cAPO was a risk indicator for graft loss (hazard ratio 2.55, 1.09-5.96) but no significant risk factor on its own when considering pre-pregnancy eGFR (2.18, 0.92-5.13). This was the largest and most comprehensive study of pregnancy outcomes after KT, including pregnancies in women with poor kidney function, to facilitate individualized pre-pregnancy counselling based on pre-pregnancy graft function. Overall obstetric outcomes are good. The risk of adverse outcomes is mainly dependent on pre-pregnancy graft function and hemodynamic adaptation to pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Preeclampsia , Nacimiento Prematuro , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Peso al Nacer , Estudios de Cohortes , Creatinina , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/etiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Clin Transplant ; 35(12): e14473, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34453355

RESUMEN

Pregnancy can have risks after kidney transplantation (KT). This mixed-methods study aimed to identify the percentage of women getting pregnant after KT and explore motives for and against pregnancy together with psychosocial and medical factors involved in decision making. Furthermore, experiences of pregnancy and child-raising were explored. Women who got pregnant after KT were matched with women who had not been pregnant after KT. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using directed content analysis. After KT, only 12% of women got pregnant. Eight women with pregnancies after KT were included (P-group) and matched with 12 women who had not been pregnant after KT (NP-group). Women after KT experienced a high threshold to discuss their pregnancy wish with their nephrologist. The nephrologists' advice played an important role in decision-making, but differed between the groups. In the P-group, a desire for autonomy and positive role models were decisive factors in proceeding with their pregnancy wish. In the NP-group, disease burden and risk perception were decisive factors in not proceeding with their pregnancy. Nephrologists need to be proactive in broaching this subject and aware of factors influencing the decision and outcomes. Standardized preconception guidelines on pregnancy counseling are recommended.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Actitud , Consejo , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo
10.
Transpl Int ; 34(11): 2317-2328, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34390041

RESUMEN

Research has shown that a home-based educational intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease results in better knowledge and communication, and more living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT). Implementation research in the field of renal care is almost nonexistent. The aims of this study were (1) to demonstrate generalizability, (2) evaluate the implementation process, and (3) to assess the relationship of intervention effects on LDKT-activity. Eight hospitals participated in the project. Patients eligible for all kidney replacement therapies (KRT) were invited to participate. Effect outcomes were KRT-knowledge and KRT-communication, and treatment choice. Feasibility, fidelity, and intervention costs were assessed as part of the process evaluation. Three hundred and thirty-two patients completed the intervention. There was a significant increase in KRT-knowledge and KRT-communication among participants. One hundred and twenty-nine out of 332 patients (39%) had LDKT-activity, which was in line with the results of the clinical trials. Protocol adherence, knowledge, and age were correlated with LDKT-activity. This unique implementation study shows that the results in practice are comparable to the previous trials, and show that the intervention can be implemented, while maintaining quality. Results from the project resulted in the uptake of the intervention in standard care. We urge other countries to investigate the uptake of the intervention.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia
11.
Kidney Int ; 97(6): 1243-1252, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359810

RESUMEN

Early graft loss (EGL) is a feared outcome of kidney transplantation. Consequently, kidneys with an anticipated risk of EGL are declined for transplantation. In the most favorable scenario, with optimal use of available donor kidneys, the donor pool size is balanced by the risk of EGL, with a tradeoff dictated by the consequences of EGL. To gauge the consequence of EGL we systematically evaluated its impact in an observational study that included all 10,307 deceased-donor kidney transplantations performed in The Netherlands between 1990 and 2018. Incidence of EGL, defined as graft loss within 90 days, in primary transplantation was 8.2% (699/8,511). The main causes were graft rejection (30%), primary nonfunction (25%), and thrombosis or infarction (20%). EGL profoundly impacted short- and long-term patient survival (adjusted hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval: 8.2; 5.1-13.2 and 1.7; 1.3-2.1, respectively). Of the EGL recipients who survived 90 days after transplantation (617/699) only 440 of the 617 were relisted for re-transplantation. Of those relisted, only 298 were ultimately re-transplanted leading to an actual re-transplantation rate of 43%. Noticeably, re-transplantation was associated with a doubled incidence of EGL, but similar long-term graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.1; 0.6-1.8). Thus, EGL after kidney transplantation is a medical catastrophe with high mortality rates, low relisting rates, and increased risk of recurrent EGL following re-transplantation. This implies that detrimental outcomes also involve convergence of risk factors in recipients with EGL. The 8.2% incidence of EGL minimally impacted population mortality, indicating this incidence is acceptable.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Riñón , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Transpl Int ; 33(10): 1190-1198, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32403158

RESUMEN

The role of ureteral stents in living-donor kidney transplantation remains uncertain. In this randomized controlled trial (SPLINT), we compared urological complications in living-donor kidney transplantations performed with or without stents. We included 200 consecutive patients that received living-donor kidney transplantations at the Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam. Patients (124 males, 76 females, mean age 54 ± 13) were randomized for suprapubic externalized single J stents (N = 100) or no stent (N = 100). The primary outcome was the probability of a percutaneous nephrostomy insertion (PCN) during a 12-month follow-up. To assess whether no stenting is noninferior to stenting, we allowed the probability of a PCN to increase by at most 5% (this is the noninferiority margin). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. In the no-stent group, there were more PCN insertions, 14% (95% CI 4.3-23.7%); urinary leakages, 12% (95% CI 5.4-21.3%); and surgical re-interventions because of urological complications, 8% (95% CI 1.5-14.5%). The stent group had more hematuria, 26% (95% CI 13.1-38.9%); and graft rejections, 15% (95% CI 2.7-27.3%). Patients in both groups had similar mean GFRs at several time points. Besides a better Euro-Qol-5D in the no-stent group at 2 and 6 weeks postoperative, similar quality of life was reported based on SF-36 and Euro-Qol-5D scores. In this trial, noninferiority has not been demonstrated for no-stent placement in relation to the number urological complications.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Uréter , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Calidad de Vida , Férulas (Fijadores) , Stents , Uréter/cirugía
13.
Transpl Int ; 33(9): 1099-1105, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32460390

RESUMEN

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients may be at risk for severe COVID-19. Data on the clinical course of COVID-19 in immunosuppressed patients are limited, and the effective treatment strategy for these patients is unknown. We describe our institutional experience with COVID-19 in SOT. Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were extracted from the electronic patient files. A total of 23 SOT transplant recipients suffering from COVID-19 were identified (n = 3 heart; n = 15 kidney; n = 1 kidney-after-heart; n = 3 lung, and n = 1 liver transplant recipient). The presenting symptoms were similar to nonimmunocompromised patients. Eighty-three percent (19/23) of the patients required hospitalization, but only two of these were transferred to the intensive care unit. Five patients died from COVID-19; all had high Clinical Frailty Scores. In four of these patients, mechanical ventilation was deemed futile. In 57% of patients, the immunosuppressive therapy was not changed and only three patients were treated with chloroquine. Most patients recovered without experimental antiviral therapy. Modification of the immunosuppressive regimen alone could be a therapeutic option for SOT recipients suffering from moderate to severe COVID-19. Pre-existent frailty is associated with death from COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 35(7): 699-707, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32440788

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Live donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure. However, long-term donor prognosis is debated, necessitating high-quality studies. METHODS: A follow-up study of 761 living kidney donors was conducted, who visited the outpatient clinic and were propensity score matched and compared to 1522 non-donors from population-based cohort studies. Primary outcome was kidney function. Secondary outcomes were BMI (kg/m2), incidences of hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular events, cardiovascular and overall mortality, and quality of life. RESULTS: Median follow-up after donation was 8.0 years. Donors had an increase in serum creatinine of 26 µmol/l (95% CI 24-28), a decrease in eGFR of 27 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI - 29 to - 26), and an eGFR decline of 32% (95% CI 30-33) as compared to non-donors. There was no difference in outcomes between the groups for ESRD, microalbuminuria, BMI, incidence of diabetes or cardiovascular events, and mortality. A lower risk of new-onset hypertension (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.33-0.62) was found among donors. The EQ-5D health-related scores were higher among donors, whereas the SF-12 physical and mental component scores were lower. CONCLUSION: Loss of kidney mass after live donation does not translate into negative long-term outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality compared to non-donors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR3795.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Riñón/fisiología , Donadores Vivos/psicología , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Creatinina/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/etiología , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/etiología , Incidencia , Pruebas de Función Renal , Donadores Vivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Nefrectomía/psicología , Vigilancia de la Población , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
BMC Nephrol ; 21(1): 374, 2020 08 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32859157

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: After kidney transplantation non-adherence and inadequate self-management undermine clinical outcomes and quality of life. Both have been demonstrated to be substantial in all age groups. However, interventions promoting adherence and self-management among kidney transplant recipients that have proven to be effective are scarce. In this study we aim to develop and test an intervention to optimize adherence and self-management. In this article we describe the background and design of the trial entitled 'promoting Medication AdheRence and Self-management among kidney transplant recipients' (MARS-trial)'. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-center, parallel arm randomized controlled trial. Nonadherent kidney transplant recipients aged 12 years or older are eligible for inclusion. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the experimental or a control group. The control group will receive care-as-usual. The experimental group will receive care-as-usual plus the MARS-intervention. The MARS-intervention is an outreaching intervention, based on the principles of (multi) systemic therapy which means involving the social network. A standardized intervention protocol is used for consistency but we will tailor the behavior change techniques used to the specific needs and determinants of each patient. The primary outcome of medication adherence will be measured using electronic monitoring. Secondary outcome measures regarding medication adherence and self-management are also assessed. Data is collected at baseline (T0), after a run-in period (T1), at six months post-baseline/end of treatment (T2) and after a six month follow-up period (T3). DISCUSSION: We combined elements of (multi) systemic therapy and evidence-based behavior change techniques to create an outreaching and highly individualized intervention. In this trial we will investigate the impact on medication adherence and self-management after kidney transplantation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register,trial number NTR7462. Registered 7th September 2018, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7264.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Automanejo/métodos , Humanos , Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Red Social , Apoyo Social , Receptores de Trasplantes
16.
Transpl Int ; 32(4): 418-430, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30536448

RESUMEN

Perioperative antithrombotic therapy could play a role in preventing thromboembolic complications (TEC) after kidney transplantation (KTx), but little is known on postoperative bleeding risks. This retrospective analysis comprises 2000 single-organ KTx recipients transplanted between 2011 and 2016 in the two largest transplant centers of the Netherlands. TEC and bleeding events were scored ≤7 days post-KTx. Primary analyses were for associations of antithrombotic therapy with incidence of TEC and bleeding. Secondary analyses were for associations of other potential risk factors. Mean age was 55 ± 14 years, 59% was male and 60% received a living donor kidney. Twenty-one patients (1.1%) had a TEC. Multiple donor arteries [OR 2.79 (1.15-6.79)] and obesity [OR 2.85 (1.19-6.82)] were identified as potential risk factors for TEC. Bleeding occurred in 88 patients (4.4%) and incidence varied significantly between different antithrombotic therapies (P = 0.006). Cardiovascular disease [OR 2.01 (1.18-3.42)], pre-emptive KTx [OR 2.23 (1.28-3.89)], postoperative heparin infusion [OR 1.69 (1.00-2.85)], and vitamin K antagonists [OR 6.60 (2.95-14.77)] were associated with an increased bleeding risk. Intraoperative heparin and antiplatelet therapy were not associated with increased bleeding risk. These regimens appear to be safe for the possible prevention of TEC without increasing the risk for bleeding after KTx.


Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia/prevención & control
17.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 71(1): 52-64, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29157730

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maintaining anonymity is a requirement in the Netherlands and Sweden for kidney donation from live donors in the context of nondirected (or unspecified) and paired exchange (or specified indirect) donation. Despite this policy, some donors and recipients express the desire to know one another. Little empirical evidence informs the debate on anonymity. This study explored the experiences, preferences, and attitudes of donors and recipients toward anonymity. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational multicenter study using both qualitative and quantitative methods. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 414 participants from Dutch and Swedish transplantation centers who received or donated a kidney anonymously (nondirected or paired exchange) completed a questionnaire about anonymity. Participation was a median of 31 months after surgery. FACTORS: Country of residence, donor/recipient status, transplant type, time since surgery. OUTCOMES: Experiences, preferences, and attitudes toward anonymity. RESULTS: Most participants were satisfied with their experience of anonymity before and after surgery. A minority would have liked to have met the other party before (donors, 7%; recipients, 15%) or after (donors, 22%; recipients, 31%) surgery. Significantly more recipients than donors wanted to meet the other party. Most study participants were open to meeting the other party if the desire was mutual (donors, 58%; recipients, 60%). Donors agree significantly more with the principle of anonymity before and after surgery than recipients. Donors and recipients thought that if both parties agreed, it should be permissible to meet before or after surgery. There were few associations between country or time since surgery and experiences or attitudes. The pros and cons of anonymity reported by participants were clustered into relational and emotional, ethical, and practical and logistical domains. LIMITATIONS: The relatively low response rate of recipients may have reduced generalizability. Recall bias was possible given the time lag between transplantation and data collection. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study illustrated that although donors and recipients were usually satisfied with anonymity, the majority viewed a strict policy on anonymity as unnecessary. These results may inform policy and education on anonymity.


Asunto(s)
Anonimización de la Información , Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Adulto , Actitud , Anonimización de la Información/ética , Anonimización de la Información/psicología , Familia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/ética , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Donadores Vivos/psicología , Donadores Vivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Satisfacción Personal , Información Personal , Opinión Pública , Suecia , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/ética , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/psicología , Receptores de Trasplantes/psicología , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos
18.
Transpl Int ; 31(3): 318-331, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29130538

RESUMEN

The increase in patients using public solicitation (PS) to find a living kidney donor has generated a debate about the ethical complexities of PS. To investigate why patients engaged in PS and what they experienced during PS, we conducted semistructured interviews with 20 Dutch patients with end-stage renal disease who had publicly solicited a living donor. Transcripts were thematically analyzed. We identified ten themes on patients' considerations preceding PS: cautiousness in discussing living donation within social network; reluctance to accept a kidney from loved ones; rejection/withdrawal of related donor candidates; moral objections to paid donation; the ease of social media; encouraged by others; ends justifying the means; despair and urge to take action; public disclosure of vulnerability; fear of being (perceived to be) selfish. We identified nine themes on patients' experiences: positive emotions and support generated by action; genuine and ulterior motives for donation; patients acting as educators and screeners; time- and energy-consuming process; emotionally taxing process; positive interactions with donor candidates; feeling of dependency and obligation; limited cooperation from health professionals; demands a proactive attitude and media strategy. These results can inform and complement (existing) policies on PS and provide content for education of patients who are considering PS.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Donadores Vivos/ética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
19.
Transpl Int ; 30(3): 266-276, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27717017

RESUMEN

To establish the outcome of live kidney donors 5 years after donation, we investigated the risk for progressive renal function decline and quality of life (QoL). Data on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine, hypertension, QoL and survival were assessed in a prospective cohort of 190 donors, who donated between 2008 and 2010. Data were available for >90%. The mean age predonation was 52.8 ± 11.5 years, 30 donors having pre-existent hypertension. The mean follow-up was 5.1 ± 0.9 years. Eight donors had died due to non-donation-related causes. After 5 years, the mean eGFR was 60.2 (95% CI 58.7-62.7) ml/min/1.73 m2 , with a median serum creatinine of 105.1 (95% CI 102.5-107.8) µmol/l. eGFR decreased to 33.6% and was longitudinally lower among men than women and declining with age (P < 0.001), without any association on QoL. Donors with pre-existent and new-onset hypertension demonstrated no progressive decline of renal function overtime compared to nonhypertensives. No donors were found with proteinuria, microalbuminuria or at risk for end-stage renal disease. After an initial decline postdonation, renal function remained unchanged overtime. Men and ageing seem to affect renal function overtime, while decreased renal function did not affect QoL. These data support further stimulation of living kidney donation programmes as seen from the perspective of donor safety.


Asunto(s)
Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Selección de Donante , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Donadores Vivos/psicología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos
20.
Transpl Int ; 30(12): 1243-1252, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28777487

RESUMEN

Anonymity between living donors and recipients is a topic of discussion among transplant professionals. This longitudinal study explored living kidney donors' and patients' perspectives on anonymity. Prior to surgery (T0) and 3 months afterward (T1), participants in unspecified or specified indirect donation programs completed a questionnaire on their experiences with and attitudes toward anonymity as well as demographic and medical characteristics. Nonparametric tests were used to assess group differences and associations. Participants were content with anonymity at T0 and T1. Fourteen and 23% wanted to meet at T0 and T1, respectively. If the other party expressed the wish to meet, 50% (T0) and 55% (T1) would be willing to meet. Most participants agreed that meeting should be allowed if both parties agree. Attitude toward anonymity did not differ between donors/recipients, nor between T0/T1 and unspecified/specified indirect donation programs. This study showed that most donors and recipients who participated in anonymous donation schemes are in favor of a conditional approach to anonymity. Guidelines on how to revoke anonymity if both parties agree are needed and should include education about pros and cons of (non-) anonymity and a logistical plan on how, when, where, and by whom anonymity should be revoked.


Asunto(s)
Confidencialidad/psicología , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Donadores Vivos/psicología , Donantes de Tejidos/psicología , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Receptores de Trasplantes/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Confidencialidad/ética , Femenino , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/ética , Donadores Vivos/ética , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda