Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

País como asunto
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Cancer ; 130(18): 3077-3081, 2024 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804732

RESUMEN

Cancer treatment has become increasingly expensive, partially due to the use of specialty drugs. The costs of these drugs are often passed down to patients, who may face the consequences of paying for more than they can afford, leading to financial toxicity. The 340B drug pricing program is a health care policy that may provide an opportunity to mitigate the financial consequences of cancer care. The 340B program requires manufacturers to sell outpatient drugs at a discount to hospitals caring for a significant number of socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals. The program intended for hospitals to use savings from discounted purchases to expand their safety net to vulnerable patients. Some studies have shown that participating hospitals do this by offering more charity and discounted care, whereas others have demonstrated that hospitals fail to sufficiently expand their safety net. A potential flaw of the program is the lack of guidance from governing bodies on how hospitals should use savings from discounted purchases. There has been growing discussion among stakeholders to reform the 340B program given the mixed findings of its effectiveness. With the rising costs of specialty drugs and associated prevalence of financial toxicity in patients with cancer, there is an opportunity to address these issues through reform that improves the program. Directing hospitals to offer specific safety net opportunities, such as passing along discounted drug prices to vulnerable populations, could help the growing number of patients who are financially burdened by medications at the core of the 340B program.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Política de Salud/economía , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/economía , Estados Unidos
2.
Matern Child Health J ; 22(9): 1240-1246, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29948762

RESUMEN

Purpose Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs) provide integrated and comprehensive services to individuals affected with rare bleeding disorders, such as hemophilia and Von Willebrand disease. Through the 340 Drug Pricing Program, HTCs may use pharmacy income to support clinical staff and patient services. The objective of this study was to describe the impact of the 340B program funding on services and support provided by HTCs to persons affected by rare bleeding disorders. Description Federally designated comprehensive HTCs with established 340B programs were invited to participate in a mailed survey in 2014. Participants were requested to report on 340B program-funded staff and services in the calendar year 2013. Assessment The 31 of 37 HTCs responding served over 10,000 individuals, or one-third of the national HTC patient population. The majority of responding HTCs reported that 340B program income supported over 90% of staff such as nurses, social workers, and physical therapists. Conclusion The results from this survey of 31 centers with established programs demonstrates the HTCs' reliance on 340B program support for vital comprehensive services, that are otherwise non-reimbursable, and highlights the importance of the 340B program in sustaining the high quality of care and in increasing access for a geographically dispersed, medically vulnerable population.


Asunto(s)
Atención Integral de Salud/organización & administración , Costos de los Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hemofilia A/terapia , Atención al Paciente/economía , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Atención Integral de Salud/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía , Masculino , Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía , Servicios Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/economía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
3.
Urol Pract ; : 101097UPJ0000000000000655, 2024 Jun 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39196717

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The use of expensive oral targeted agents for advanced prostate can be influenced by those who stand to gain from their use. The 340B drug pricing program allows eligible hospitals to purchase medications at steep discounts, generating millions of dollars in savings. The extent to which hospitals engage in higher-risk prescribing due to program incentives is unclear. METHODS: Medicare claims were used to perform a retrospective study of men with advanced prostate cancer. The primary outcome was targeted therapy use in men with high noncancer mortality risk. Secondary outcomes included androgen biosynthesis inhibitor use in men with cardiovascular history, androgen receptor inhibitor use in men with neurocognitive history, and therapy within 14 days of death. Proportional hazards models were used to assess time-to-event outcomes, while logistic regression was used for binary outcomes. RESULTS: In men with high noncancer mortality risk, targeted therapy use did not differ at 340B participating compared to nonparticipating hospitals (hazard ratio [HR] 1.1, 95% CI 0.67-1.5). There was no difference in androgen biosynthesis inhibitor use in men with a prior cardiac event (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.70-1.3) or androgen receptor inhibitor use in men with a prior neurocognitive event (HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.65-3.4) in those treated at 340B participating compared to nonparticipating hospitals. Therapy use in the last 14 days of life did not vary by 340B participation (odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.86-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: In men with advanced prostate cancer, high-risk prescribing and futility measures did not vary by participation in the 340B drug pricing program.

4.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 897-901, 2023.
Artículo en Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-972256

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE To learn from 340B drug pricing program (short for 340B program) in the United States, and provide reference for optimizing the operation and management of designated retail pharmacies under the “dual channel” policy in China. METHODS The status quos of the implementation of out-of-hospital pharmacies under the 340B program in the United States was reviewed to summarize the experience of the management of out-of-hospital pharmacies under the program in the United States, and to propose thoughts of management and possible problems for designated retail pharmacies under the “dual channel” policy in China. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS Out-of-hospital pharmacies under the 340B program lacked sufficient basic information and medical insurance status of patients compared to medical institutions, which easily led to duplicate discounts and drug diversion issues. Due to the separation of out-of-hospital pharmacies from the management and restrictions on the use of drugs in medical institutions, coupled with the economic incentives brought by the sale of drugs, the 340B program in the United States faced high medical expenditure and adverse selection risks for out-of-hospital pharmacies. In this regard, when China is carrying out the construction of designated retail pharmacies under the “dual channel” policy, it is necessary to clarify the selection criteria for designated retail pharmacies, enhance the financial transparency of medical institutions and designated retail pharmacies, establish a scientific prescription circulation mechanism, strengthen the review and certification of insured patients and prescriptions, and improve the supervision and management mechanism. Meanwhile, the drug sales situation of designated retail pharmacies should be reasonably incorporated into the drug use management of medical institutions, so as to achieve the availability of drugs without abuse, and effectively control costs.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda