ECG Features Associated With Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Combined AFFIRM and AF-CHF Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The association between standard parameters from a simple 12-lead ECG (i.e., QRS duration and PR, JT, and QT intervals) and adverse cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, arrhythmic mortality, and hospitalizations) in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been previously studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: A pooled analysis of patient-level data was conducted on 5,436 patients, age 68.2 ± 8.3 years, 34.8% female, with a history of non-permanent AF randomized in AFFIRM and AF-CHF trials. The predictive value of ECG parameters was assessed in AF and sinus rhythm in multivariate Cox regression models. During a follow-up of 40.8 ± 16.3 months, QRS duration >120 milliseconds was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI; 1.21-1.76] in AF, P < 0.001), cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.75, 95% CI (1.15-2.65) in sinus rhythm, P = 0.009; HR 1.56, 95% CI [1.27-1.93] in AF, P < 0.001), arrhythmic mortality (HR 1.90, 95% CI [1.09-3.32] in sinus, P = 0.024; HR 1.84, 95% CI [1.35-2.51] in AF, P < 0.001), any hospitalization (HR 1.15, 95% CI [1.02-1.29] in AF, P = 0.027), and cardiovascular hospitalization (HR 1.21, 95% CI [1.06-1.37] in AF; P = 0.004). Increased PR interval (>200 milliseconds) was independently associated with cardiovascular (HR 1.56, 95% CI [1.11-2.21], P = 0.010) and arrhythmic (HR 1.91, 95% CI [1.14-3.18], P = 0.004) mortality. The JT and QTc intervals were not predictive of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Simple parameters from standard ECGs are significantly and independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with a history of AF.

Efficacy of amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation with and without left ventricular dysfunction: a pooled analysis of AFFIRM and AF-CHF trials.

INTRODUCTION: Despite amiodarone's established safety profile in the setting of heart failure, it is unknown whether its impact on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation is modulated by left ventricular function. METHODS AND RESULTS: A pooled analysis of 3,307 patients (age 68.0 ± 0.2 years; 31.1% female) enrolled in AFFIRM and AF-CHF trials was conducted to assess the effect of rhythm control with amiodarone on cardiovascular outcomes, according to left ventricular systolic function. In amiodarone-treated patients (N = 1,107), freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation was 84% and 45% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, with no differences according to left ventricular function (P = 0.8754). Similarly, the adjusted proportion of time spent in atrial fibrillation (15.0 ± 1.8%) did not vary according to ventricular function (P = 0.6094). Over 40.0 ± 0.3 months of follow-up, 1,963 (59.4%) patients required at least one hospitalization, 1,401 (42.6%) of whom had cardiovascular-related hospitalizations. Adjusted all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalization rates were similar with amiodarone versus rate control in all patients and in subgroups with and without severe left ventricular dysfunction. A total of 729 (22.0%) patients died, 498 (15.1%) from cardiovascular causes. Adjusted all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were similar with amiodarone versus rate control overall and in subgroups with and without severe left ventricular dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Amiodarone's efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm and reducing the burden of atrial fibrillation is similar in the presence or absence of severe left ventricular dysfunction. Rhythm control with amiodarone is associated with comparable hospitalization and mortality rates to rate control in patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction.