Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.

PURPOSE: Severe metaphyseal bone defects remain a challenge and represent a growing problem in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). The purpose of this study was to examine the survival of first-generation tantalum metal cones (TMC) and to assess clinical and radiographic data obtained from mid- to long-term follow-ups (FU) after RTKA with severe bony defects. METHODS: This retrospective case series included 100 consecutive patients of the same centre, who underwent RTKA surgery with TMC for tibia and/or femur bone defects between January 2011 and December 2015. Fourteen patients had died and six were lost for FU, leaving a total of eighty patients (one hundred and twelve TMC) for final evaluation. Clinical parameters including the Knee Society Score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and range of motion (ROM) were determined preoperatively based on the patients' medical charts, and assessed again during the final FU after an average of 6.1 (5-9) years postoperative. Standardised postoperative X-rays were analysed during the final FU visit for osseointegration of the cones, and any signs of implant loosening were assessed with the modified Knee Society Radiographic review criteria. Perioperative and postoperative complications, reoperations, as well as implant and cone re-revisions were analysed. Survivorship analysis was performed with (a) cone-related revision for any reason and (b) implant component revision for any reason. RESULTS: Previous RTKA had to be performed due to 64 (80%) aseptic and 16 (20%) septic failures. At the final FU, 75 (94%) tibia and 76 (95%) femur TMCs and implants were clinically stable. One patient experienced loosening of cones and implants at the femur and tibia but denied re-revision surgery. There were eight (10%) reoperations including two early wound healing problems, two inlay changes, two periprosthetic fractures, one debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), and one secondary patella replacement. The six (7.5%) re-revisions included two aseptic loosening's of the opposite implant without TMC, one arthrodesis for recurrent instability, and three deep infections managed by two two-stage exchanges, and one amputation for persistent infection. At re-revision, all TMC cones were osteointegrated without signs of loosening. The determined clinical parameters showed significant (p < 0.001) postoperative improvement, and objective KSS was rated as excellent in 51%, and as good in 22% of patients at the final FU. The estimated 8-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 95% for TMC and 92.5% for implant components. CONCLUSION: Tantalum metal cones (TMC) demonstrate a secure fixation for treatment of severe femoral and tibial metaphyseal bone defects during RTKA. This fixation concept showed excellent mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes with promising 8-year survival rates for cones and implant components. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level IV.

Tibial bone defect prediction based on preoperative artefact-reduced CT imaging is superior to standard radiograph assessment.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative CT-based Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI)-grading and to correlate Computed tomography (CT)-based volumetric defect measurements with intraoperative AORI findings. METHODS: 99 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) with preoperative CT-images were identified in an institutional revision registry. CT-image segmentation with 3D-Slicer Software was used to create 3D tibial bone defects which were then graded according to the AORI-classification. The AORI classification categorizes tibial defects into three types: Type I has healthy cortical and cancellous bone near the joint line, Type II involves metaphyseal bone loss affecting one or both condyles, and Type III indicates deficient metaphyseal bone with distal defects and potential damage to the patellar tendon and collateral ligament attachments. These 3D-CT gradings were compared to preoperative X-ray and intraoperative AORI grading. The Friedman test was used to investigate differences between AORI values of each measurement method. Volumetric 3D-bone defect measurements were used to investigate the relationship between AORI classification and volumetric defect size in the three anatomic zones of the tibia. RESULTS: Substantial agreements between preoperative 3D-CT AORI and intraoperative AORI (kappa = 0.663; P < 0.01) and fair agreements between preoperative X-ray AORI and intraoperative AORI grading (kappa = 0.304; P < 0.01) were found. Moderate correlations between volume of remaining bone and intraoperative AORI grading were found in epiphysis (rS = - 0.529; P < 0.001), metaphysis (rS = - 0.557; P < 0.001) and diaphysis (rS = - 0.421; P < 0.001). Small volumetric differences between AORI I vs. AORI II defects and relatively large differences between AORI II and AORI III defects in each zone were detected. CONCLUSION: Tibial bone defect prediction based on preoperative 3D-CT segmentation showed a substantial agreement with intraoperative findings and is superior to standard radiograph assessment. The relatively small difference in defect volume between AORI I, IIa and IIb suggests that updated CT-based classifications might hold benefits for the planning of rTKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study; III.

Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: There are various classification systems described in the literature for managing bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty (RTKA). We analysed the reliability and usefulness of these classification systems. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) To review and critique the various classification systems proposed for bone loss in RTKA. (2) Among all the proposed classifications which one is the most commonly used by surgeons to report their results. (3) What is the reliability of various bone defect classification systems for RTKA. In this review, we have assessed the studies validating those classifications with a detailed description of the limitations and the proposed modifications. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Pubmed/Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane databases and Web of Science databases were searched using multiple search terms and MeSH terms where possible. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were assessed for statistical parameters of reliability of a classification system. RESULTS: We found 16 classification systems for bone defects in RTKA. Six studies were found evaluating a classification system with reporting their reliability parameters. Fifty-four studies were found which classified bone loss using AORI classification in their series. AORI classification is most commonly reported for classifying bone defects. Type T2B and F2B are the most common bone defects in RTKA. The average kappa value for AORI classification for femoral bone loss was 0.38 (0.27-0.50) and 0.76 (0.63-1) for tibial bone loss assessment. CONCLUSION: None of the available classification systems is reliably established in determining the bone loss and treatment plans in RTKA. Among all, AORI classification is the most widely used system in clinical practice. The reliability of AORI Classification is fair for femoral bone loss and substantial for tibial bone loss.

Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Management of metaphyseal bone loss in complex primary and revision TKA is a challenge for surgeons. Out of various types of bony defects, large metaphyseal bone loss (AORI types IIB and III) requires special augments in the form of cones or sleeves. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability of metaphyseal sleeves, in dealing with massive bone defects to provide stability for immediate weight bearing and also to check short to mid-term survivorship of metaphyseal sleeves in Asian population by assessing various parameters and complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective study that includes 36 patients (43 knees), operated from 2011 to 2019. Patients with AORI type IIB (large metaphyseal bone defect) and AORI type III (metaphyseal defect with compromised collateral ligaments) were included. We included both the primary and revision knee arthroplasties in our study. Our interest in this study was to look for incidence of intra-operative iatrogenic fracture on the one hand, and post-operative complications in the form of peri-prosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening on the other hand. Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to assess improvement in patient's clinical outcome. SPSS version 23 was used to process data. RESULTS: The average age of patients in our study was 59.4 (SD 9.78) years. Male to female ratio was 21:15. The average follow-up was 5.42 (SD 2.24) years with the longest follow up of nine years. Metaphyseal sleeves were used in 12 primary TKA and 31 revision TKA. During surgery, iatrogenic fracture of tibial condyle was encountered in three patients (6.9%), all were managed without any intervention and union was achieved in all cases. There was not a single case with aseptic loosening as per radiological criteria in our study. Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) was encountered in a single case (2.3%). Pre-op Knee Society Score (KSS) was 36.21 (SD 7.43) where as it improved to 92.00 (SD 5.66), six months after surgery. Also the range of flexion was increased from 76.83o (SD 14.07o) to 122.91o (SD 4.84o). CONCLUSION: In our study, metaphyseal sleeves showed excellent short to mid-term survivorship in AORI types IIB and III boneloss in Asian population. These results are comparable to various studies conducted on North American and European population. Metaphyseal sleeve is a reliable tool in the armamentarium of the arthroplasty surgeon. It is user friendly implant and provides immediate stability to allow full weight-bearing mobilization.

Osteointegrative Sleeves for Metaphyseal Defect Augmentation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiological 5-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Cementless metaphyseal implant fixation of revision total knee arthroplasty has encouraging early results. We analyzed midterm results and implant survival of osteointegrative augments in Anderson Orthopedic Research Institute (AORI) type 2a, 2b, and 3 defects. Reasons for implant failure were explored and the potential for anatomic joint line reconstruction evaluated. METHODS: Sixty-seven consecutive patients (68 revision total knee arthroplasties) received cementless metaphyseal sleeves between 2011 and 2014. The mean follow-up was 5.0 years, mean age was 68.5 years, and mean body mass index was 31.4 kg/m2. The clinical and radiographic results were determined using established scoring systems. Additionally, the survival rate was calculated and reasons for failure were analyzed. RESULTS: In 2 patients (4.3%), sleeves had to be removed early postoperatively for deep infection after second-stage reimplantation. With continuously functioning remaining implants, the aseptic survival rate was 93.6%. Cleared up for initial technical issues due to poor bone quality, it is as high as 98%. The scores remained to be significantly improved by 64.8 points (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and 25.8 points (Knee Society score) (P < .001). In 10 patients (29.4%), diaphyseal radiolucencies were observed without suspicion of loosening. The mean joint line was noted to be 0.36 mm lower to the anatomic level. CONCLUSION: At a mean follow-up of 5.0 years, cementless osteointegrative sleeves for metaphyseal fixation in AORI 2a, AORI 2b, and AORI 3 defects yielded continuous implant fixation even in cases with preceding revisions. The cleared up aseptic survival rate was 98% at 5 years. The modular sleeve design allowed joint line reconstruction near the anatomic level.

Cementless metaphyseal sleeves without stem in revision total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cementless metaphyseal sleeve is suggested to be used without stem in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). To the best of our knowledge, no papers investigating this have been published. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome. METHOD: In this retrospective study, 71 patients operated with rTKA with sleeves without stem in the period 2009-2011 were identified; 63 were examined. All patients with the prosthesis still in place were invited to a medical examination including X-rays. American Knee Society Score (AKSS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were used as primary clinical outcome scores. RESULTS: Mean number of revisions including the revision with sleeve was 1.7. AKSS increased significantly from 62.7 to 109.6; (p value <0.0001). The overall satisfaction was 2.5 on a four-stage scale, going from very satisfied to dissatisfied (range 1-4). The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification showed 63 % of the tibias and 56 % of the femurs to be type 2B, whereas 19 % tibias and 5 % femurs were type 3. Review of the X-rays showed all prostheses fixed. Mean tibiofemoral alignment was 6.0° valgus, and 51 % were outside optimal alignment (2.4°-7.2°). Six patients were excluded from the study. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the prostheses were overall well fixed and patients' AKSS increased significantly. Many patients had pain conditions, both comorbid pain and pain that might be alignment-related, and adding a stem thus seems to be a good idea in terms of alignment. Level of evidence Level IV, case series without control group.

Treatment of severe bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty with structural allografts and porous metal cones-a systematic review.

Aseptic loosening and focal osteolysis are the most common reasons for knee arthroplasty failure. The best treatment remains unclear. We reviewed the literature on the treatment of revision knee arthroplasty using bony structural allografts (476 cases) and porous metal cones (223 cases) to determine if a difference in the revision failure rates was discernable. The failure rates were compared using a logistic regression model with adjustment for discrepancies in FU time and number of grafts used (femoral, tibial, or both). In this analysis, the porous implant shows a significantly decreased loosening rate in AORI 2 and 3 defects. The overall failure rate was also substantially lower in the porous metal group than the structural allograft group; little difference in the infection rates was noted.

Combined structural allograft and tantalum cone to manage segmental metaphyseal tibial bone defect in revision knee arthroplasty.

Tibial bone defect remains a challenge in revision knee arthroplasty. The present innovative technique combines structural allograft and tantalum metaphyseal cone for treatment of AORI stage 2A and 2B (uncontained peripheral metaphyseal) tibial defect. The aim is to reconstitute bone stock and enhance allograft osseointegration, while limiting stress to the allograft by implanting the metaphyseal cone through the allograft and the original bone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V (expert opinion).

Custom-Made Metaphyseal Sleeves in "Beyond" AORI III Defects for Revision Knee Arthroplasty-Proof of Concept and Short-Term Results of a New Technique.

BACKGROUND: While off-the-shelf cones and sleeves yield good results in AORI type 2 and 3 defects in revision knee surgery, massive longitudinal defects may require a proximal tibia replacement. To achieve the best anatomical as well as biomechanical reconstruction and preserve the tibial tuberosity, we developed custom-made metaphyseal sleeves (CMSs) to reconstruct massive defects with a hinge knee replacement. METHODS: Between 2019 and 2022, 10 patients were treated in a single-center study. The indication for revision was aseptic loosening in five cases and periprosthetic joint infection in five cases. The mean number of previous revisions after the index operations was 7 (SD: 2; 4-12). A postoperative analysis was conducted to evaluate the functional outcome as well as the osteointegrative potential. RESULTS: Implantation of the CMS in rTKA was carried out in all cases, with a mean operation time of 155 ± 48 (108-256) min. During the follow-up of 23 ± 7 (7-31) months, no CMS was revised and revisions due to other causes were conducted in five cases. Early radiographic evidence of osseointegration was recorded using a validated method. The postoperative OKS showed a significant increase (p < 0.001), with a mean score of 24 (SD: 4; range: 14-31). CONCLUSION: Custom-made metaphyseal sleeves show acceptable results in extreme cases. As custom-made components become more and more common, this treatment algorithm presents a viable alternative in complex rTKA.

Does the use of 3D-printed cones give a chance to postpone the use of megaprostheses in patients with large bone defects in the knee joint?

Revision procedures and the resulting bone loss are a big challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Therefore, we checked what functional outcomes that 3D-printed cone augments can offer to patients with bone defects (Anderson Orthopedic Research Institute [AORI] classification type 2B and 3) in the knee and whether the use of cones can delay the necessity to use a megaprotheses. Data from 64 patients (M = 22; W = 42) who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision were included in the analysis. The Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSS) and the range of motion in the knee joint were used for the functional assessment. The mean follow-up was 28 months (range: 18-44 months). The survival rate for aseptic loosening at follow-up was 100%. Infection occurred in two (3.1%) patients. The mean KSS score increased from 12.75 points preoperatively to 66.56 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean range of motion in the knee changed from 61.15° preoperatively to 115.93° postoperatively (p < 0.001). 3D-printed cone augments seem to be a good solution for patients requiring a TKA revision procedure. When used in patients with bone defects classified as 2B and 3 (AORI), they can be a good alternative, delaying the need for megaprotheses.

Assessment of the primary stability of revision tibial trays augmented with a cementless sleeve in AORI Type III defects.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have evaluated the initial stability of uncemented tibial components in revision total knee replacement (rTKR) in the presence of an Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Type II tibial defect. This study sought to evaluate similar metrics in the severe Type III (AORI TIII) defects with combined uncemented stem and sleeve fixation, specifically, the effect of varying the stem's length and tibial canal engagement upon stability and bone strain. METHOD: Finite element models generated from the CT scans of 4 tibias with Type III defects were used to investigate the primary stability, in terms of the bone-implant composite peak micromotion (CPM) and microstrains (CPS), achieved after virtual implantations with and without stems. RESULTS: A stemless rTKR had increased metaphyseal CPM and CPS compared to all stemmed implants. Significant area of the bone supporting the stemless rTKR had CPS greater than bone yield (7000 µÎµ). Short engaging stems (≤150 mm construct length), could not achieve reliable engagement in the diaphysis (canal fill ≤ 50%), leading to insufficient reduction of CPS (≥5000 µÎµ). Longer engaging stems (170-220 mm construct length), were able to reliably engage the diaphysis (fill ratio ≥ 75%) resulting in CPS ≤ 5000 µÎµ. Although, non-engaging stems resulted in increased CPM and CPS compared to engaging stems, long non-engaging stems (170-220 mm construct) appeared to provide additional stability to the rTKR compared to stemless rTKR. CONCLUSION: The results indicate a likely correlation between uncemented stem engagement and metaphyseal CPS in Type III defects. Excessive strain within the supporting metaphyseal bone is likely to lead to rTKR migration and loosening.

Influence of stems and metaphyseal sleeve on primary stability of cementless revision tibial trays used to reconstruct AORI IIB defects.

Metaphyseal augments, such as sleeves, have been introduced to augment the fixation of revision total knee replacement (rTKR) components, and can be used with or without a stem. The effect of sleeve size in combination with stems on the primary stability and load transfer of a rTKR implant in AORI type IIB defects where the defect involves both condyles are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine the primary stability of revision tibial tray augmented with a sleeve in an AORI type IIB defect which involves both condyles with loss of cortical and cancellous bone. Finite element models were generated from computed tomography (CT) scans of nine individuals. All the bones used in the study had an AORI type IIB defect. The cohort included eight females (mean weight: 64 kg, height: 1.6 m). Material properties were sampled from CT data and assigned to the FE model. Joint contact forces for level gait, stair descent, and squat were applied. Stemless sleeved implants under various loading conditions were shown to have adequate primary stability in all AORI type IIB defects investigated. Adding a stem only marginally improved the primary stability of the implant but reduced the strain in the metaphysis compared to stemless implants. Once good initial mechanical stability was established with a sleeve, there was no benefit, in terms of primary stability or bone strains, from increasing sleeve size. This study suggests that metaphyseal sleeves, without a stem, can provide the required primary stability required by a rTKR tibial implant, to reconstruct an AORI type IIB defect. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.

Are Metaphyseal Sleeves a Viable Option to Treat Bone Defect during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

Purpose Bone loss is a challenging problem during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several studies have been published on the use of metaphyseal sleeves during revision TKA. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to summarize the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of metaphyseal sleeves in the setting of revision TKA. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was performed, covering the period between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2017. Various combinations of the following key words were used: "metaphyseal," "sleeves," "knee," and "revision." A total of 10 studies were included in the present systematic review. Results A total of 904 patients with 928 implants were recorded with a mean age of 69 years. They were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 45 months. Overall 1,413 sleeves, 888 in the tibia and 525 in the femur, were implanted. There were 36 septic re-revisions of the prosthetic components (4%). Five sleeves were found loose during septic re-revision; therefore, the rate of septic loosening of the sleeves was 0.35%. An aseptic re-revision of the prosthetic components was performed 27 times (3%). Ten sleeves were found loose during aseptic re-revision; therefore, the rate of aseptic loosening of the sleeves was 0.7%. Intraoperative fractures occurred 44 times (3.1%). Finally, clinical outcome was improved at final follow-up. Conclusion Metaphyseal sleeves demonstrate high radiographic signs of osteointegration, low septic loosening rate, low intraoperative fractures rate, and a good-to-excellent clinical outcome. Hence, they are a valid option to treat large metaphyseal bone defect during revision TKA. Level of Evidence This is a systematic review of level IV studies.