Assessing the Modified Frailty Index and Post-Operative Outcomes in Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Studies identifying predictors of postoperative outcomes in adhesive small bowel obstruction are limited. This study investigates the efficacy of the modified frailty index (mFI)to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective cohort study including patients undergoing surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction after failed trial of nonoperative management between January 2015 and December 2020 was performed. Impact of frailty status using the mFI, stratified as frail (≥0.27) and robust (<0.27), on postoperative morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and discharge destination was evaluated using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Ninety-two robust patients (mean age 62.4 y, 68% female) and 41 frail patients (mean age 81.7 y, 63% female) were included. On simple stratification, frail patients had significantly increased 30-d morbidity (overall morbidity 80% versus 49%) and need for higher level of care on discharge (41% versus 9%). However, on multiple regression, functional dependence but not the mFI, was independently associated with worse 30-d overall morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 3.97, confidence interval [CI] 1.29-12.19) and lower likelihood of returning to preoperative disposition (OR 0.21, CI 0.05-0.91). The delay in operation beyond 5 d was independently associated with worse 30-d outcomes including overall morbidity and mortality (OR 7.54, CI 2.13-26.73) and decreased return to preoperative disposition (OR 0.14, CI 0.04-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: The mFI, although promising, was not independently predictive of outcomes following surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Further adequately powered studies are required.

Cecum to pelvis technique: a simple and autologous solution to prevent postoperative complications in pelvic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Empty Pelvis Syndrome, subsequent to the removal of pelvic organs, results in the descent of the small bowel into an inflamed pelvic cavity, leading to the formation of adhesions and subsequent small bowel obstruction. However, no effective measures have been previously described. OBJECTIVE: Describe a simple and autologous solution to prevent "Empty Pelvis Syndrome," small bowel obstruction, and adhesions by utilizing the cecum to occlude the pelvis. DESIGN: Mobilization of the right colon to lower the cecum into the pelvic cavity to occlude the superior pelvic ring to some degree and changing the direction of the terminal ileum. SETTINGS: Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Service. PATIENTS: Eight anonymized patients were included in this study, each with varying colorectal pathologies. Patients were above 18 years old. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percent of blockage of the superior pelvic ring produced by the descended cecum recorded in percentage; the amount of small intestine descended past the superior pelvic ring recorded in cm. RESULTS: The mobilization of the cecum achieved partial occlusion of the superior pelvic ring. The descent of the small bowel beyond this landmark ranged from 0 to 4.9 cm. LIMITATIONS: Given the small number of patients included in this study, these results cannot be generalized to the whole of the population. A bladder emptying protocol prior to CT scans was not implemented, resulting in variations in measurements among patients. CONCLUSION: The cecum-to-pelvis technique is a simple method that can serve as an autologous solution to EPS (enteropelvic fistula) and help reduce postoperative complications such as SBO (small bowel obstruction) and adhesions. It is not essential to completely occlude the superior pelvic ring to achieve successful outcomes.

Enhanced recovery programs following adhesive small bowel obstruction surgery are feasible and reduce the rate of postoperative ileus: a preliminary study.

PURPOSE: The recovery of gastrointestinal function and postoperative ileus are the leading goals for clinicians following surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction. While enhanced recovery programs may improve recovery, their feasibility in emergency surgery has not yet been proven. We sought to assess the incidence of postoperative ileus in patients following surgery for ASBO and the feasibility of enhanced recovery programs, including their benefits in the recovery of gastrointestinal functions and reducing the length of hospitalization. METHODS: This prospective study includes the first 50 patients surgically treated for ASBO between June 2021 and November 2022. Their surgery was performed either as an emergency procedure or after a short course of medical treatment. The main aim was to compare the observed rate of postoperative ileus with a theoretical rate, set at 40%. The study protocol was registered in clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT04929275. RESULTS: Among the 50 patients included in this study, it reported postoperative ileus in 16%, which is significantly lower than the hypothetical rate of 40% (p = 0.0004). The median compliance with enhanced recovery programs was 75% (95%CI: 70.1-79.9). The lowest item observed was the TAP block (26%) and the highest observed items were preoperative counselling and compliance with analgesic protocols (100%). The overall morbidity was 26.5%, but severe morbidity (Dindo-Clavien > 3) was observed in only 3 patients (6%). Severe morbidity was not related with the ERP. CONCLUSION: Enhanced recovery programs are feasible and safe in adhesive small bowel obstruction surgery patients and could improve the recovery of gastrointestinal functions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT04929275. WHAT DOES THE STUDY CONTRIBUTE TO THE FIELD?: Perioperative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) surgery needs to be improved in order to reduce morbidity. Enhanced recovery programs (ERP) are both feasible and safe following urgent surgery for ASBO. ERPs may improve the recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) functions.

Seprafilm® and adhesive small bowel obstruction in colorectal/abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of Seprafilm® in preventing clinically significant adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is controversial and deserves further review. The aim of this review was to assess the utility of Seprafilm® in preventing clinically significant adhesive bowel obstruction after abdominal operations, with separate focus on colorectal resections. The secondary aim was to provide an updated literature review on the safety profile of this implant. METHODS: An up-to-date systematic review was performed on the available literature between 2000 and 2023 on PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases. The main outcome measures were rates of adhesive bowel obstruction, as well as rates of intervention. The secondary outcome was the clinical safety profile of Seprafilm® as described in current literature. RESULTS: A total of 17 observational studies were included, accounting for 62,886 patients. Use of Seprafilm® was associated with a significant reduction in adhesive bowel obstruction events (OR 0.449, 95% CI: 0.3271 to 0.6122, p < 0.001), with preserved efficacy seen in laparoscopic cases. This did not translate into a reduced rate of reintervention. Clinicians should also be aware of isolated reports of a paradoxical inflammatory reaction leading to fluid collections after Seprafilm® use, although they appear uncommon. CONCLUSION: Seprafilm® can be considered in select patients although further study to determine which patients will benefit most is required.

Prognostic value of CT findings for conservative treatment failure in adhesive small bowel obstruction.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the radiological CT findings that are significantly correlated with the outcome of conservative management with oral water-soluble contrast medium in patients presenting with Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction (ASBO) to the Emergency Room. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, we considered all consecutive patients admitted to the ER from February 2019 to February 2023 for ASBO with an available contrast-enhanced CT scan performed at diagnosis and treated with conservative management. The investigated CT findings were type and location of transition zone, ASBO degree, fat notch sign, beak sign, small bowel feces sign, presence of peritoneal free fluid and pneumatosis intestinalis. Radiological parameters were analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression to test the significant association between the CT parameters and the target. RESULTS: Among the 106 included patients (median age 74.5 years), conservative treatment was effective in 59 (55.7%) and failed in 47 (44.3%), needing delayed surgery. In the failure group, there was a higher prevalence of patients who had previous ASBO episodes (p = 0.03), a greater proportion of females (p = 0.04) and a longer hospital stay (p < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, two CT findings were significantly correlated with failure of conservative treatment: fat notch sign (OR = 2.95; p = 0.04) and beak sign (OR = 3.42; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Two radiological signs correlate with failure of non-operative management in ASBO, suggesting their importance in surgical decision-making. Patients presenting with these signs are at higher risk of unsuccessful conservative treatment and may require undelayed surgical intervention.

[Comparison of early operative treatment and 48-hour conservative treatment in small bowel obstruction (COTACSO): intermediate results]. / Promezhutochnye rezul'taty otkrytogo prospektivnogo randomizirovannogo mnogotsentrovogo sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya rannei operatsii i 48-chasovogo neoperativnogo lecheniya spaechnoi kishechnoi neprokhodimosti.

Optimal treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) is not defined. Surgery is the only method of treatment for obvious strangulating SBO. Non-operative management (NOM) is widely used among patients with low risk of strangulation, i.e. no clinical, laboratory and CT signs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are recommended to determine the optimal method (early intervention or NOM), but their safety is unclear due to possible delay in surgery for patients needing early intervention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A RCT is devoted to outcomes of early operative treatment and NOM for adhesive SBO. The estimated trial capacity is 200 patients. Thirty-two patients were included in interim analysis. In 12 hours after admission, patients without apparent signs of strangulation were randomized into two clinical groups after conservative treatment. Group I included 12 patients who underwent immediate surgery, group II - 20 patients after 48-hour NOM. The primary endpoint was success of non-surgical regression of SBO and reduction in mortality. To evaluate patient safety, we analyzed mortality, complication rates and bowel resection in this RCT with previously published studies. RESULTS: In group I, all 12 (100%) patients underwent surgery. Only 4 (20%) patients required surgery in group II. Mortality, complication rates and bowel resection rates were similar in both groups. Strangulating SBO was found in 8 (25%) patients. Overall mortality was 6.3%, bowel resection rate - 6.3%, iatrogenic perforation occurred in 3 (18.8%) patients. These values did not exceed previous findings. CONCLUSION: Non-operative management within 48 hours prevented surgery in 80% of patients with SBO. Interim analysis found no significant between-group differences in mortality, complication rates and bowel resection rate. Patients had not been exposed to greater danger than other patients with adhesive SBO. The study is ongoing.

Existing Scores Fail to Predict Bowel Ischemia in Patients With Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Early recognition of bowel ischemia is critical in patients suffering from acute adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). Recent studies attempted to propose a score combining clinical and radiological factors to predict the risk of bowel ischemia in patients with ASBO. This study aimed to compare and validate the existing clinical scores with a cohort of surgical patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including all ASBO cases admitted to our institution between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2019. Based on three existing clinical scores, we calculated the risk of bowel ischemia for each patient. We then divided the cohort into groups based on the risk for bowel ischemia. For each risk-based category, the proportion of patients who underwent surgical resection and were found to have evidence of ischemic bowel was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients presenting with 217 episodes of acute ASBO were included. One hundred seventy-one (78.8%) cases were managed nonoperatively while 46 cases (21.2%) required surgery. Sixteen patients (7.3%) were eventually found to have ischemic bowel while 13 required small bowel resection (5.9%). All three clinical scores showed correlation between the calculated risk of ischemia and the intraoperative finding of ischemia. However, all three scores overestimated ischemia rates in the high-risk groups, yielding a PPV of 8.3%-28.5% and a NPV of 93.3%-94.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Current clinical scores for predicting bowel ischemia in patients with ASBO are of high value in ruling out ischemia, yet are of extremely low sensitivity, warranting an overly aggressive and unnecessary surgical approach.

Predictive factors for operative intervention and ideal length of non-operative trial in adhesive small bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is responsible for 350,000 U.S. hospitalizations and costs ~ $2.3 billion annually. The current standard of care for SBO is to trial 3 to 5 days of non-operative management. This study evaluated the factors associated with operative management. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients admitted with adhesive SBO. Exclusions were for operative intervention within 24 h or death. RESULTS: At baseline (N = 360), mean age was 65.9 years, 57.8% female, 72.3% white, mean BMI 26.1, 38.7% with history of SBO and 98.1% had history of abdominal surgery. Symptom onset prior to hospitalization was 1-2 days. 55.6% had successful non-operative management at discharge (median length of stay 3 days) vs. 44.4% operative conversion. In univariate analyses, BMI, SBO history, surgical history, days symptom onset, vitals, abdominal pain, obstipation, acute kidney injury, and lack of small bowel feces sign on CT scan were significantly associated with operative management. In a multivariable logistic regression, after controlling all other variables, a lack of small bowel feces sign (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 2.25, 95% CI 1.06-4.77, p = 0.04) and history of exploratory laparotomy (aOR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.90, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with operative management. Time from admission to surgery averaged 3.89 days: small bowel resection (55/160) was 4.9 days (median = 4), compared to patients without resection (3.4 days, median = 2; p = 0.00; OR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.07-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: A lack of small bowel feces sign can be a potential indicator for operative management and should be further explored. Since the median resolution of symptoms in the non-operative management group was ~ 2 days and a 20% higher odds for bowel resection each day surgery is delayed, the conservative trial period for adhesive SBO should not exceed 3 days.

Predicting the Need for Surgery in Uncomplicated Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Scoring Tool.

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative treatment can be attempted for uncomplicated adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO), but carries a risk of delayed surgery. Highlighting initial parameters predicting risk of failure of nonoperative management would be of great interest. METHODS: Patients initially managed conservatively for uncomplicated ASBO were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictive failure's factors. Based on the risk factors, a score was created and then prospectively validated in a different patients' population. RESULTS: Among 171 patients included, 98 (57.3%) were successfully managed conservatively. In a multivariate analysis, three independent nonoperative management failure's factors were identified: Charlson Index ≥4 (P = 0.016), distal obstruction (P = 0.009), and maximum small bowel diameter over vertical abdominal diameter ratio >0.34 (P = 0.023). A score of two or three was associated with a risk of surgery of 51.4% or 70.3% in the retrospective analysis and 62.2% or 75% in the validation cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical-radiological score may help guide surgical decision-making in uncomplicated ASBO. A high score (≥2) was predictive of failure of nonoperative management. This tool could assist surgeons to determine who would benefit from early surgery.

Long-term outcomes of nasogastric tube with Gastrografin for adhesive small bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: We had previously reported that the administration of Gastrografin through a nasogastric tube (NGT-G) followed by long tube (LT) strategy could be a novel standard treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO); however, the long-term outcomes after initial improvement remain unknown. This study aimed to analyze the long-term outcomes of first-line NGT-G. METHODS: Enrolled patients with ASBO were randomly assigned to receive LT or NGT-G between July 2016 and November 2018. Thereafter, the cumulative surgery rate, cumulative recurrence rate, and overall survival (OS) rate were analyzed. In addition, subset analysis was conducted to determine the cumulative recurrence rate according to colonic contrast with Gastrografin at 24 h. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients (LT group, n = 111; NGT-G group, n = 112) were analyzed over a median follow-up duration of 550 days. The cumulative 1-year surgery rates, cumulative 1-year recurrence rates, and 1-year OS rates in the LT and NGT-G groups were 18.8% and 18.1%, 30.0% and 31.7%, and 99.1% and 96.6%, respectively; no significant differences were observed between both groups. In the NGT-G group, a negative colonic contrast at 24 h demonstrated a higher tendency for future recurrence compared with a positive colonic contrast at 24 h (1-year recurrence rate: negative contrast, 46.9% vs positive contrast, 27.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Gastrografin through a nasogastric tube followed by LT can be a promising treatment strategy for ASBO, with long-term efficacies equivalent to initial LT placement.

[Nasointestinal intubation in the treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction]. / Nazointestinal'naya intubatsiya v lechenii ostroi spaechnoi tonkokishechnoi neprokhodimosti.

Proximal gastrointestinal decompression is essential in the treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Improvement of endoscopic methods, surgical instruments and radiological methods of control makes it possible to timely assess lavage and intra-intestinal therapy. The review presents current views on upper gastrointestinal decompression and other options for the treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Comparing outcomes of nonoperative treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction with and without antibiotics.

INTRODUCTION: Some clinicians administer antibiotics in adhesive SBO treatment to prevent bacterial translocation without evidence confirming reduced sepsis and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive antibiotic administration in nonoperative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) in a retrospective study. METHODS: Using a Japanese national inpatient database, we identified 114,786 eligible patients with adhesive SBO and divided patients into a group who did not receive intravenous antibiotics in the initial 2 consecutive days after admission (control group, n = 71,666) and a group who received intravenous antibiotics ≥2 days after admission (antibiotic group, n = 43,120). To compare the in-hospital mortality, occurrence of sepsis, septic shock, Clostridioides difficile colitis, length of stay, and total costs between the two groups, we performed instrumental variable analyses to adjust for measured and unmeasured confounding factors. RESULTS: Overall, in-hospital mortality was 2.2%, and the occurrence of sepsis was 0.8%. In the instrumental variable analyses, no significant differences were found for in-hospital mortality, occurrence of sepsis, septic shock, Clostridioides difficile colitis, or total hospitalization costs. The antibiotic group showed a longer length of stay than the control group (coefficient, 1.9 days; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-3.2). CONCLUSIONS: In this large nationwide cohort of patients with adhesive SBO, we found no benefit regarding preventive antibiotic administration in nonoperative treatment; however, antibiotic administration was associated with a longer hospital stay. These results did not support routine administration of antibiotics at admission to prevent bacterial translocation.

Paediatric adhesive bowel obstruction: a systematic review.

Adhesions following abdominal surgery remain a common cause of bowel obstruction. The incidence is between 1 and 12.6% in children who have had previous abdominal surgery. While conservative management is usually trialled in all patients (including children) suspected of having ASBO, the majority will require surgical intervention. New materials such as Seprafilm® have been studied in the paediatric population, with promising results of its use in index abdominal surgeries to prevent the formation of adhesions. In this article, we conducted a systematic review to present an overview of the current knowledge on the incidence, aetiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of ASBO.

[Features of diagnosis and treatment of elderly and senile patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction.]

Adhesive small bowel obstruction is a common pathology with a tendency to increase characterized by a complex pathogenetic course with a high percentage of complications and deaths. Among the forms of intestinal obstruction caused by mechanical obstacles acute small bowel obstruction ranges from 64,3 to 80% with a mortality rate of 5,1 to 8,4% in the structure of urgent diseases. The complexity of early diagnosis along with an erased clinical picture severe course against a burdened background as well as age - in elderly and senile people leads to the search for new optimized treatment and diagnostic protocols. The purpose of this study was to study the nature of the course of adhesive small bowel obstruction in elderly and senile people to establish the information content of various diagnostic methods to determine the indications for the choice of the optimal period and method of treatment. A comparative analysis of 191 patients aged 60 to 90 years and older who received treatment in the surgical departments of St. Elizabeth Hospital (St. Petersburg) in the period from 2016-2019 was carried out. All patients were divided into 2 groups: the main group consisted of 106 patients (2018-2019) the comparison group included 85 patients (2016-2017). All patients of the main group used an improved diagnostic and treatment algorithm with the use of an original point-assessment scale which made it possible to optimize diagnostics and improve treatment results. Patients in the comparison group were examined in accordance with standard protocols and surgical treatment was carried out exclusively by traditional methods. The use of the proposed therapeutic and diagnostic algorithm made it possible to increase the probability of conservative resolution of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction from 20% (17) to 33% (35) and to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications from 60,2% (41) to 25,3% (18), p<0,01, and the mortality rate from 23,5% (16) to 7% (5), p<0,05.

[Timing of surgery, intestinal ischemia and other real factors of mortality in acute adhesive small bowel obstruction: a multiple-center study]. / Faktory riska letal'nogo iskhoda pri ostroi spaechnoi tonkokishechnoi neprokhodimosti. Rezul'taty mnogotsentrovogo issledovaniya.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the factors of mortality in patients with acute adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective multiple-center study included 143 (85.6%) patients with ASBO out of 167 consecutive patients with small bowel obstruction for the period 2017-2019. All patients were divided into 3 groups: early surgery group (within 12 hours after admission), late surgery (after 12 hours), non-surgical management group. The outcomes and Kaplan-Meier survival were compared in all groups. RESULTS: ASBO was resolved without surgery in 77 (53.8%) patients 19.6±17.4 (M=14) hours. In the Early Surgery Group (n=36), 24 patients had strangulation, 12 ones had non-strangulated bowel obstruction. In the Late Surgery Group (n=30), 15 patients had strangulation and 15 ones had no strangulation. Mortality was similar in early and late surgery (p=0.287), early and late surgery in patients with strangulation (p=0.940), early and late surgery in patients without strangulation (p=0.76). Patients died (n=10) after surgery only. Thus, postoperative mortality was 15.2%, overall mortality - 7.0%. All patients who underwent surgery after 24 hours (n=14) survived. Surgery increased the mortality risk compared to non-surgical management (95% CI 0 - 15.9, p=0.001). There was no effect of surgery time (more or less than 12 hours) on mortality for strangulation (95% CI 13.0-16.7, p 0.788) and non-strangulated obstruction (95% CI 29.4-5.4, p=0.061), bowel resection (95% CI 33.3-14.0, p=0.187), presence of bowel ischemia (95% CI 14.3-17.9, p 0.613). CONCLUSION: Delayed surgery may be advisable in patients with ASBO and no obvious signs of strangulation due to less mortality.

[New approaches in conservative treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction]. / Novye podkhody v konservativnom lechenii ostroi spaechnoi tonkokishechnoi neprokhodimosti.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the outcomes of therapy of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction via development of a comprehensive management including CT, deep endoscopy-assisted nasointestinal drainage of small bowel with injection of a water-soluble contrast. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 128 patients with acute adhesive small bowel obstruction for the period from 2015 to 2018. The study included 2 groups of patients depending on therapeutic approach and duration of treatment. In the first group, conventional approach for acute adhesive small bowel obstruction was applied. Upon admission, all patients with confirmed acute adhesive small bowel obstruction underwent gastric intubation for decompression of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Barium sulfate injection followed by X-ray examination was performed to assess an effectiveness of therapy. In the second group, computed tomography was performed in addition to X-ray examination and ultrasound. Moreover, conservative treatment included deep endoscopy-assisted nasointestinal drainage and subsequent administration of a water-soluble contrast in addition to traditional approaches. RESULTS: Therapy was effective in 99 (71.2%) patients; 39 (28.8%) ones required surgery. Deep endoscopy-assisted nasointestinal drainage with injection of a water-soluble contrast was effective in 45 (78.9%) patients. Overall mortality in traditional approach was 1.4%, postoperative mortality - 3.7%. There were no lethal outcomes in case of a new approach. CONCLUSION: Deep endoscopy-assisted nasointestinal drainage with injection of a water-soluble contrast is the most effective therapeutic method for acute adhesive small bowel obstruction (78.9%). These findings can significantly improve treatment outcomes in these patients.

Impact of barometric pressure on adhesive small bowel obstruction: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is one of the most common causes of postoperative morbidity. According to Boyle's law, decreased barometric pressure expands the volume of intestinal gas. We aimed to elucidate the relationship between barometric pressure and ASBO. METHODS: We divided 215 admissions of 120 patients with ASBO into three groups: the fasting group, which responded to fasting (n = 51); the decompression group, which was successfully treated with gastrointestinal decompression (n = 104); and the surgery group which required emergency or elective surgery to treat ASBO (n = 60). We compared and examined clinical backgrounds, findings on admission, and barometric pressure during the peri-onset period (29 days: from 14 days before to 14 days after the onset of ASBO). RESULTS: There were significant differences among the three groups regarding gender, history of ASBO, hospital length of stay, and barometric pressure on the onset day of ASBO. Barometric pressure on the onset day was significantly higher in the fasting group than in the decompression group (p = 0.005). During pre-onset day 5 to post-onset day 2, fluctuations in the barometric pressure in the fasting and decompression groups showed reciprocal changes with a symmetrical axis overlapping the median barometric pressure in Matsumoto City; the fluctuations tapered over time after onset. In the fasting group, the barometric pressure on the onset day was significantly higher than that on pre-onset days 14, 11, 7, 4, 3, and 2; post-onset days 3 and 10; and the median pressure in Matsumoto City. Conversely, in the decompression group, the barometric pressure on the onset day was lower than that on pre-onset days 14, 5-2; post-onset days 1, 2, 7, 8, 11, 13, and 14; and the median pressure in Matsumoto City. In the surgery group, the barometric pressure on the onset day was equivalent to those on the other days. CONCLUSIONS: ASBO with response to conservative treatment is vulnerable to barometric pressure. Additionally, ASBO that is successfully treated with fasting and decompression is associated with a different barometric pressure on the onset day and reciprocal fluctuations in the barometric pressure during the peri-onset period.

Clinical benefit of oral lactulose for postoperative care of pateints with complicated appendicitis using propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of oral lactulose for pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis, who underwent appendectomy. BACKGROUND: Oral lactulose was widely used for gastrointestinal function regulation. However, clinical benefit for oral lactulose regarding its effects on recent postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) recovery and long term adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) incidence, especially in the postoperative pediatric population has not yet defined. METHODS: A total of 525 pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis underwent appendectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 317 cases were subjected to oral lactulose management and 208 patients without, served as control. Propensity score 1:1 matching was carried out to adjust for any potential baseline variables. In 189 paired patients, clinical outcomes, including gastrointestinal recovery variables, incidence of ABSO, as well as adverse events, were compared according to the oral lactulose administration or not. RESULTS: Patients who received oral lactulose administration achieved early gastrointestinal function recovery, including, first bowel movement (Risk ratio [RR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.63, p = 0.005) and first solid feeding (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.92, p = 0.012). A lower occurrence of ASBO (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.87; p = 0.011) and lower constipation (Odds ratio [OR], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.46; p < 0.001), were noted in patients received oral lactulose than in patients without. Furthermore, significantly fewer patients required readmission (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.99; p = 0.031) and reoperation (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.92; p = 0.022) in the patients who received oral lactulose administration. CONCLUSIONS: Beneficial effects of oral lactulose administration in pediatric patients undergone appendectomy were indicated, such as accelerating gastrointestinal function recovery, reducing the postoperative incidence of ASBO and constipation, so reduced readmission and reoperation.

Randomized controlled trial of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in adhesive postoperative small bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy is a controversial treatment for adhesive postoperative small bowel obstruction (ASBO), with only a few retrospective studies reported. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of HBO therapy in the treatment of ASBO. METHODS: Patients with ASBO were randomly assigned to no-HBO (standard arm) or HBO (intervention arm). Patients of the intervention arm were treated once daily at a pressure of 2.0 atm absolute and received 100% oxygen. The primary endpoint was the success rate of medical treatment. This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry as UMIN000010399. RESULTS: The no-HBO group included 40 patients, and the HBO group included 33 patients. Patient characteristics, time to oral intake, and length of hospital stay were similar between the two groups. No significant differences were noted between the no-HBO and HBO groups in the need for long intestinal tube decompression (20.0 versus 18.2%, respectively, p = 1.000) and the need for operative intervention (10.0 versus 18.2%, respectively, p = 0.332). The overall success rate of medical treatment was 72.5% in the no-HBO group and 78.8% in the HBO group (p = 0.594). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, HBO for ASBO has no additional effect in medical treatment.

Failure of conservative treatment with Gastrografin® for adhesive small bowel obstruction after colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors related with failure of conservative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) in patients with previous colorectal surgery. METHODS: Patients admitted with the diagnosis of ASBO after previous colorectal resection, were included. All patients underwent administration of Gastrografin®. Abdominal radiography was done after 24 h, to confirm the presence of contrast in colon (incomplete obstruction) or not (complete obstruction). Several factors were investigated to study their relationship with the failure of conservative management. Failure of conservative management was considered when emergency operation was needed to solve ASBO. RESULTS: Incomplete obstruction was observed in 174 episodes (93.0%) while in 13 (7.0%) was complete. One hundred seventy-one ASBO episodes (91.4%) responded successfully to nonoperative treatment and 16 (8.6%) required emergency surgery. Five patients needed bowel resection. Results on the diagnostic test with Gastrografin® showed a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 99%, positive predictive value 92%, and negative predictive value 98%. Age over 75 years was the only predictive factor for failure of conservative management. The median waiting time from the radiologic confirmation of complete obstruction to surgery was higher in patients requiring bowel resection when compared to those who did not need resection. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Gastrografin® in ASBO after colorectal resection is a safe and useful tool for the indication of conservative management. Age over 75 years is a predictive factor for need of surgery. Surgery should be performed no later than the following 24 h of confirmed complete obstruction.