Viewpoint: Provoked thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Unprovoked thrombosis (thrombosis occurring without an established environmental factor favouring the episode) is a classic feature of APS. In the general population, provoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) is clearly defined and has clinical and therapeutic differences compared with unprovoked VTE. Whether provoked VTE in the context of APS may lead to a limited treatment duration is not well established. Therefore, careful clinical and laboratory evaluation is needed to identify patients eligible for a limited duration of anticoagulation treatment after provoked VTE. Given the uncertainties of available data, the risks and benefits of treatment decisions should be clearly explained. Decisions should be shared by both the patient and physician. Cardiovascular risk factors are common in patients with APS with arterial thrombosis. There are insufficient data suggesting that cardiovascular risk factor control would allow the cessation of anticoagulation. In most instances, arterial thrombosis will require prolonged anticoagulants. A careful analysis of clinical characteristics and laboratory evaluation, particularly the aPL antibody profile, is needed to make decisions on a case-by-case basis.

Pattern of disease expression in SLE patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: data from Indian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Inception cohort (INSPIRE).

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) are present in one-third of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, and they are associated with both criteria and non-criteria manifestations. We studied the prevalence, clinical associations, and impact on mortality of APLA in SLE patients from India. Among the Indian SLE inception cohort (INSPIRE), patients who had data on all five routinely performed APLAs [lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I(ß2GPI)] at enrolment were selected. Patients were divided into four categories based on the presence/absence of APLA associated manifestations and presence/absence of the APLA viz SLE-APS, SLE-APLA, SLE: events but no APLA, and SLE: no events, no APLA (reference group). 1035 SLE patients at least 1 APLA antibody was detected in 372 (35.9%). LA was present in 206 (19.9%), aCL in 126 (12.2%) and ß2-GPI in 178 (17.2%). There were 88 thrombotic events in 83 patients (8.0%); 73 (82.9%) being arterial; APLA positivity was present in 37 (44.6%) [AOR 1.70 (1.054, 2.76)]. SLE-APS patients were younger and had higher mortality [AOR 4.11 (1.51, 11.3)], neuropsychiatric and hematologic disease. SLE-APLA also had a higher mortality rate [AOR 2.94 (1.06, 8.22)] than the reference group. The mortality was highest in the subset of patients with thrombotic events in the presence of APLA [AOR 7.67 (1.25, 46.9)]. The mere presence of APLA also conferred higher mortality even in the absence of thrombotic events [AOR 3.51 (1.43, 8.63)]. Hematologic manifestations (36.1%) were the most common non-criteria-manifestation. One-third of SLE patients have APLA and its presence is associated with non-criteria hematologic manifestations, arterial thrombosis and higher mortality rate.

The relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies in obstetrics.

AIM AND METHODOLOGY: To provide a comprehensive review on new findings and current recommendations regarding antiphospholipid antibodies with particular emphasis on clinical impact on gestation. CONCLUSION: Antiphospholipid antibodies are an important risk factor for the development of a series of pregnancy-related complications. Early diagnosis and appropriate therapy can reduce the incidence of pregnancy loss and pregnancy-related complications.

Anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibody maybe a novel biomarker of spontaneous preterm birth.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous preterm birth is challenging to prevent. Only few predictors of spontaneous preterm birth risk have been reported, and further studies on spontaneous preterm birth should be conducted to reduce the number of cases. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to explore if anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibody can be used to predict the risk of spontaneous preterm birth, and its clinical value in assessing the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS: A total of 302 pregnant women who had delivered between January 2019 and December 2021 were enrolled into the study. The subjects were assigned to the case group (28-33+6 weeks, n = 41; 34-36+6 weeks, n = 96) and control group (37-42 weeks, n = 165) according to the gestational period. The age, body mass index, and gestational days of the two groups were recorded. Blood samples were collected and the levels of anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibody, white blood cell, red blood cell, hemoglobin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, urea, creatinine, glucose, triglyceride, and total cholesterol were evaluated. Pregnant women diagnosed with sPTB that met the standards after evaluation by the clinician were included in the study. RESULTS: The level of anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibody was higher in case group than in the control group [(23.93 ± 8.11)Ru/mL vs (11.50 ± 5.33)Ru/mL]. The results showed that anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibody was an independent risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth. The area under ROC curve of anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibody to predict spontaneous preterm birth was 0.8875 (95%CI 0.8443-0.9307). The highest predicted value of anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibody was 16.49Ru/ml. CONCLUSION: Anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibody has a high clinical significance and can be used by clinicians to evaluate the probability of spontaneous preterm birth.

Determination of diagnostic threshold in harmonization and comparison of clinical utility for five major antiphospholipid antibody assays used in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-ß2 -glycoprotein I antibodies (aß2 GPI) are essential in diagnosing antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) according to the international APS guideline. Five commercial assays for aCL and aß2 GPI are available in Japan, but their test results are quite discordant. For harmonization of diagnosing APS, upper reference limit (URL) and diagnostic accuracy of each assay were evaluated and compared by testing common sets of specimens across all assays. METHODS: We evaluated two manual and three automated assays for aCL and aß2 GPI of IgG- and IgM classes. 99%URL (the upper limit of reference interval: as per guideline) together with 97.5%URL were determined by testing sera from 198 to 400 well-defined healthy subjects. Both URLs were compared with the cutoff values, which were determined based on ROC analysis by testing 50 each of plasma specimens from patients with/without APS. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated as area under curve (AUC) of the ROC curve. RESULTS: A variable degree of discrepancy between URLs and the cutoff values was observed, which was partly attributable to between-year assay variability. 97.5%URLs were set lower and closer to the cutoff values than 99%URLs. For all assays, diagnostic accuracies of both aß2 GPI-IgG and aCL-IgG were generally high (AUC: 0.84-0.93); whereas those for IgM-class assays were low (AUC: 0.57-0.67), implicating its utility is limited to rare IgG negative APS cases. CONCLUSION: To ensure harmonized APS diagnosis, the diagnostic thresholds of the five assays were evaluated by common procedures. Contrary to the guideline, 97.5%URL is rather recommended for diagnosing APS, which showed a closer match to the cutoff value.

Antiphospholipid patterns predict risk of thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated which aPL combinations increase the risk of future thrombosis in patients with SLE. METHODS: This prospective cohort study consisted of SLE patients who had been tested for all seven aPL (LA, aCL isotypes IgM, IgG and IgA, and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I isotypes IgM, IgG and IgA). Pooled logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between aPL and thrombosis. RESULTS: There were 821 SLE patients with a total of 75 048 person-months of follow-up. During the follow-up we observed 88 incident cases of thrombosis: 48 patients with arterial, 37 with venous and 3 with both arterial and venous thrombosis. In individual models, LA was the most predictive of any [age-adjusted rate ratio 3.56 (95% CI 2.01, 6.30), P < 0.0001], venous [4.89 (2.25, 10.64), P < 0.0001] and arterial [3.14 (1.41, 6.97), P = 0.005] thrombosis. Anti-ß2-glycoprotein I IgA positivity was a significant risk factor for any [2.00 (1.22, 3.3), P = 0.0065] and venous [2.8 (1.42, 5.51), P = 0.0029] thrombosis. Only anti-ß2-glycoprotein I IgA appeared to add significant risk to any [1.73 (1.04, 2.88), P = 0.0362] and venous [2.27 (1.13, 4.59), P = 0.0218] thrombosis among those with LA. We created an interaction model with four categories based on combinations of LA and other aPL to look at the relationships between combinations and the risk of thrombosis. In this model LA remained the best predictor of thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that in SLE, LA remained the best predictor of thrombosis and adding additional aPL did not add to the risk, with the exception of anti-ß2-glycoprotein I IgA.

High IgA antiphospholipid autoantibodies in healthy Sudanese explain the increased prevalence among Sudanese compared to Swedish systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

OBJECTIVES: IgA antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are prevalent in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients of African American, Afro-Caribbean and South African origin. Nevertheless, data from North Africa are lacking, and most studies use manufacturer-suggested cut-offs based on Caucasian controls. Therefore, we compared aPL isotypes in Sudanese and Swedish SLE patients using nation-based cut-offs. METHODS: Consecutive SLE patients and age- and sex-matched controls from Sudan (N = 115/106) and Sweden (N = 340/318) were included. All patients fulfilled the 1982 American College of Rheumatology SLE classification criteria. Antiphospholipid syndrome-related events were obtained from patients' records. IgA/G/M anticardiolipin and anti-ß2 glycoprotein I (ß2GPI) were analysed with two independent assays. IgA anti-ß2GPI domain 1 (D1) was also investigated. Manufacturers' cut-offs and the 95th and 99th percentile cut-offs based on national controls were used. RESULTS: Sudanese patients and controls had higher levels and were more often positive for IgA aPL than Swedes when using manufacturers' cut-offs. In contrast, using national cut-offs, the increase in IgA aPL among Sudanese patients was lost. Occurrence of IgA anti-D1 did not differ between the countries. Venous thromboses were less common among Sudanese patients and did not associate with aPL. No clinical associations were observed with IgA anti-ß2GPI in Sudanese patients. Thromboses in Swedes were associated with IgG/M aPL. Fetal loss was associated with aPL in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: IgA anti-ß2GPI prevalence was higher among Sudanese compared to Swedish patients when manufacturers' cut-offs were used. This situation was reversed when applying national cut-offs. Anti-D1 was not increased in Sudanese patients. Previous studies on populations of African origin, which demonstrate a high prevalence of IgA aPL positivity, should be re-evaluated using a similar cut-off approach.

16th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force Report on Antiphospholipid Syndrome Treatment Trends.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), an acquired autoimmune thrombophilia, is characterised by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies. The 16th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force on APS Treatment Trends reviewed the current status with regard to existing and novel treatment trends for APS, which is the focus of this Task Force report. The report addresses current treatments and developments since the last report, on the use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with APS, antiplatelet agents, adjunctive therapies (hydroxychloroquine, statins and vitamin D), targeted treatment including rituximab, belimumab, and anti-TNF agents, complement inhibition and drugs based on peptides of beta-2-glycoprotein I. In addition, the report summarises potential new players, including coenzyme Q10, adenosine receptor agonists and adenosine potentiation. In each case, the report provides recommendations for clinicians, based on the current state of the art, and suggests a clinical research agenda. The initiation and development of appropriate clinical studies requires a focus on devising suitable outcome measures, including a disease activity index, an optimal damage index, and a specific quality of life index.

Two Novel Technologies for the Detection of Anti-cardiolipin and Anti ß2-Glycoprotein Antibodies in the Real Life: Chemiluminescent in Comparison to the Addressable Laser Bead Immunoassays.

In the present study, we evaluated two novel technologies, the chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) QUANTA Flash on BIO-FLASH (Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, CA, USA) and the addressable laser bead immunoassay (ALBIA) on BioPlex™ 2200 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) for the detection of anti-cardiolipin IgG/IgM (aCL) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein IgG/IgM (aß2GPI) antibodies. The study was performed on 134 samples from consecutive patients (59 males and 75 females, mean age 54 ± 10 years) who consulted a rheumatologist because thrombosis and/or pregnancy complications were present or another immunological disease (Sjogren's syndrome, inflammatory arthritis). Fourteen patients of the total fulfilled 25the Sydney criteria for APS and for these patients previous results of aPLs were available. Sera were tested for aCL and aß2GPI of IgG and IgM isotypes using CIA (BIO-FLASH) and ALBIA (BioPlex™ 2200). Overall agreement between CIA and ALBIA ranged from 88.1% (aCL IgG) to 97.8% (aß2GPI IgG). Cohen's kappa coefficient ranged from 0.53 to 0.91, implying moderate to almost perfect agreement. Almost perfect agreement was found between BioPlex™ 2200 and BIO-FLASH aß2GPI IgG and aCL IgM with Cohen's kappa of 0.91 and 0.88, respectively. On the other hand, moderate agreement was found between BioPlex™ 2200 and BIO-FLASH aCL IgG and ß2GPI IgM assays with Cohen's kappa of 0.57 and 0.53, respectively. The two novel technologies look promising and comparable but further studies with larger cohorts are needed to contribute to the better understanding of the new aPLs antibodies assays performance.

Autoantibody detection is not recommended for chronic pancreatitis: a cross-sectional Study of 557 patients.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune factor was regarded as one of the risk factors in the pathogenesis of chronic pancreatitis (CP), especially for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). However, whether autoimmune factor plays a role in non-AIP CP or not was unknown. METHODS: Hospitalized patients with non-AIP CP from January 2010 to October 2016 were detected for 22 autoantibodies at the time of hospital admission. Autoantibodies with frequency > 0.5% were enrolled to calculate the frequency in historial healthy controls through literature search in PubMed. Differentially expressed autoantibodies were determined between patients and historial healthy controls, and related factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In a total of 557 patients, 113 cases were detected with 19 kinds of positive autoantibodies, among them anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2-GPI) antibody was most frequent (9.16%). Compared with historial healthy controls, the frequencies of serum ß2-GPI and anti SS-B antibody in patients were significantly higher, while frequencies of anti-smooth muscle antibody and anticardiolipin antibody were significantly lower (all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis result showed that diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.515) and common bile duct stricture (OR = 2.844) were the risk factors of positive ß2-GPI antibody in patients while diabetes mellitus in first-/second-/third-degree relatives (OR = 0.266) was the protective factor. There were no related factors for other three differentially expressed autoantibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Four autoantibodies were expressed differentially between patients with non-AIP CP and historial healthy controls. Due to limited significance for diagnosis and treatment of chronic pancreatitis, autoantibodies detection is not recommended conventionally unless suspected of AIP.

Revisiting the Phadia/EliA cut-off values for anticardiolipin and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibodies: a systematic evaluation according to the guidelines.

Background Phadia/EliA fluorescence enzyme immunoassays are widely used automated assays for anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) antibodies. To date, cut-off values for these assays have not been evaluated systematically and the evidence behind manufacturer's recommended cut-off values is not clear. Objective To determine Phadia/EliA cut-off values for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) according to the procedures suggested by guidelines. Methods A total of 266 blood donors (135 females and 131 males) were included. The pre-handling and analysis of the samples were performed according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) guideline for solid phase aPL assays. Cut-off values and corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CI) for each antibody were established and outliers were handled according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline for reference intervals. Samples from 377 consecutive patients, referred to our thrombophilia center with evidence of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity were included for aPL testing. Results The in-house 99th (97.5th) percentile cut-off values were 11 (8.7), 12 (6.9) 8.5 (5.0) AU/mL for aß2GPI IgG, IgM and IgA, and 21 (13) GPL-U/mL and 41 (25) MPL-U/mL for aCL IgG and IgM, respectively. The prevalence of positive results (%) defined by these cut-off values in patients with evidence of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity was 9.5 (12.2), 1.6 (2.9), and 7.0 (9.9), and 0.8 (3.8) for aß2GPI IgG, IgM, and aCL IgG and IgM respectively. The use of in-house 99th percentile cut-off values compared to the manufacturer suggested cut-off values resulted in 1 and 39 fewer samples for aß2GPI and aCL to be classified as positive for aPL, respectively. Conclusions We present Phadia/EliA cut-off values with 90% CI for aPL determined systematically according to the ISTH and CLSI guidelines. These values are different from values previously determined, suggesting variation of aPLs in different populations. Our findings indicate the need for each laboratory to determine/validate assay specific cut-off values for aPL.

Antiphospholipid antibody-mediated effects in an arterial model of thrombosis are dependent on Toll-like receptor 4.

Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) produce antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and develop vascular thrombosis that may occur in large or small vessels in the arterial or venous beds. On the other hand, many individuals produce aPL and yet never develop thrombotic events. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) appears to be necessary for aPL-mediated prothrombotic effects in venous and microvascular models of thrombosis, but its role in arterial thrombosis has not been studied. Here, we propose that aPL alone are insufficient to cause thrombotic events in an arterial model of APS, and that a concomitant trigger of innate immunity (e.g. TLR4 activation) is required. We show specifically that anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-ß2GPI) antibodies, a subset of aPL, accelerated thrombus formation in C57BL/6 wild-type, but not TLR4-deficient, mice in a ferric chloride-induced carotid artery injury model. These aPL bound to arterial and venous endothelial cells, particularly in the presence of ß2GPI, and to human TLR4 by enzyme-linked immunoassay. Arterial endothelium from aPL-treated mice had enhanced leukocyte adhesion, compared to control IgG-treated mice. In addition, aPL treatment of mice enhanced expression of tissue factor (TF) in leukocytes induced by the TLR4 ligand lipopolysaccharide (LPS). aPL also enhanced LPS-induced TF expression in human leukocytes in vitro. Our findings support a mechanism in which aPL enhance TF expression by leukocytes, as well as augment adhesion of leukocytes to the arterial endothelium. The activation of TLR4 in aPL-positive individuals may be required to trigger thrombotic events.

ß2-glycoprotein I, lipopolysaccharide and endothelial TLR4: three players in the two hit theory for anti-phospholipid-mediated thrombosis.

The thrombogenic effect of ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2GPI)-dependent anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) in animal models was found to be LPS dependent. Since ß2GPI behaves as LPS scavenger, LPS/ß2GPI complex was suggested to account for in vitro cell activation through LPS/TLR4 involvement being LPS the actual bridge ligand between ß2GPI and TLR4 at least in monocytes/macrophages. However, no definite information is available on the interaction among ß2GPI, LPS and endothelial TLR4 in spite of the main role of endothelial cells (EC) in clotting. To analyse at the endothelial level the need of LPS, we investigated the in vitro interaction of ß2GPI with endothelial TLR4 and we assessed the role of LPS in such an interaction. To do this, we evaluated the direct binding and internalization of ß2GPI by confocal microscopy in living TLR4-MD2 transfected CHO cells (CHO/TLR4-MD2) and ß2GPI binding to CHO/TLR4-MD2 cells and human umbilical cord vein EC (HUVEC) by flow cytometry and cell-ELISA using anti-ß2GPI monoclonal antibodies in the absence or presence of various concentrations of exogenous LPS. To further investigate the role of TLR4, we performed anti-ß2GPI antibody binding and adhesion molecule up-regulation in TLR4-silenced HUVEC. Confocal microscopy studies show that ß2GPI does interact with TLR4 at the cell membrane and is internalized in cytoplasmic granules in CHO/TLR4-MD2 cells. ß2GPI binding to CHO/TLR4-MD2 cells and HUVEC is also confirmed by flow cytometry and cell-ELISA, respectively. The interaction between ß2GPI and TLR4 is confirmed by the reduction of anti-ß2GPI antibody binding and by the up-regulation of E-selectin or ICAM-1 by TLR4 silencing in HUVEC. ß2GPI binding is not affected by LPS at concentrations comparable to those found in both ß2GPI and antibody preparations. Only higher amount of LPS that can activate EC and up-regulate TLR4 expression are found to increase the binding. Our findings demonstrate that ß2GPI interacts directly with TLR4 expressed on EC, and that such interaction may contribute to ß2GPI-dependent aPL-mediated EC activation. At variance of monocytic cells, we also showed a threshold effect for the action of LPS, that is able to enhance anti-ß2GPI antibody EC binding only at cell activating concentrations, shown to increase TLR4 expression. This in vitro model may explain why LPS behaves as a second hit increasing the expression of ß2GPI in vascular tissues and triggering aPL-mediated thrombosis in experimental animals.

Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) manifests through venous or arterial thrombosis, with or without pregnancy complication alongside the continuous presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). APS classification relies on three aPL subtypes: anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-ß2GPI), and lupus anticoagulants (LA) antibodies. Given that thrombosis and pregnancy issues are not unique to APS, the precise and reliable identification of aPL forms the basis for diagnosis. Semi-quantitative solid-phase assays identify two antibodies, aCL and anti-ß2GPI, while LA detection occurs through various phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays that are based on antibody behaviour. LA, specifically, is conclusively associated with thrombosis, prompting discussions around the serological criteria for APS. Despite advancements in LA detection, the standardisation of all aPL detection assays remains imperative. The combined presence of aCL and anti-ß2GPI with thrombosis inconsistently triggers concern. Initial presentations by APS patients commonly exhibit a heightened risk of stroke, miscarriages in the later stages of pregnancy, positive results of LA tests, and widespread thrombosis across multiple organs, often leading to adverse outcomes. Correctly diagnosing this condition is pivotal to avoid unnecessary long-term secondary thromboprophylaxis.

Management of Cardiovascular Complications in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Narrative Review with a Focus on Older Adults.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), also known as Hughes syndrome, is an acquired autoimmune and procoagulant condition that predisposes individuals to recurrent thrombotic events and obstetric complications. Central is the role of three types of antiphospholipid antibodies that target phospholipid-binding proteins: lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2-GPI-Ab), and anti-cardiolipin (aCL). Together with clinical data, these antibodies are the diagnostic standard. However, the diagnosis of APS in older adults may be challenging and, in the diagnostic workup of thromboembolic complications, it is an underestimated etiology. The therapeutic management of APS requires distinguishing two groups with differential risks of thromboembolic complications. The standard therapy is based on low-dose aspirin in the low-risk group and vitamin K antagonists in the high-risk group. The value of direct oral anticoagulants is currently controversial. The potential role of monoclonal antibodies is investigated. For example, rituximab is currently recommended in catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Research is ongoing on other monoclonal antibodies, such as daratumumab and obinutuzumab. This narrative review illustrates the pathophysiological mechanisms of APS, with a particular emphasis on cardiovascular complications and their impact in older adults. This article also highlights advancements in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of APS.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by recurrent pregnancy morbidity or thrombosis in combination with the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in plasma/serum. Antiphospholipid antibodies are a heterogeneous, overlapping group of autoantibodies, of which anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI), anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies and antibodies that prolong plasma clotting time in tests in vitro known as lupus anticoagulant (LAC) are included in the laboratory criteria for the diagnosis of APS. The presence of LAC antibodies in plasma is indirectly determined by measuring the length of coagulation in two tests - activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and diluted Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT). The concentration of aß2GPI and aCL (immunglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) isotypes) in serum is directly determined by solid-phase immunoassays, either by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), fluoroimmunoassay (FIA), immunochemiluminescence (CLIA) or multiplex flow immunoassay (MFIA). For patient safety, it is extremely important to control all three phases of laboratory testing, i.e. preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical phase. Specialists in laboratory medicine must be aware of interferences in all three phases of laboratory testing, in order to minimize these interferences. The aim of this review was to show the current pathophysiological aspects of APS, the importance of determining aPLs-a in plasma/serum, with an emphasis on possible interferences that should be taken into account when interpreting laboratory findings.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Vascular Thrombosis in Patients with Severe Forms of COVID-19.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) are a laboratory criterion for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and are known to cause clinical symptoms such as vascular thrombosis or obstetric complications. It is suggested that aPLA may be associated with thromboembolism in severe COVID-19 cases. Therefore, we aimed to combine clinical data with laboratory findings of aPLA at four time points (admission, worsening, discharge, and 3-month follow-up) in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. In 111 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, current and past history of thrombosis and pregnancy complications were recorded. Nine types of aPLA were determined at four time points: anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti- ß2GPI), and antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) of the IgM, IgG, or IgA isotypes. During hospitalization, seven patients died, three of them due to pulmonary artery thromboembolism (none were aPLA positive). Only one of the five who developed pulmonary artery thrombosis was aPLA positive. Out of 9/101 patients with a history of thrombosis, five had arterial thrombosis and none were aPLA positive at admission and follow-up; four had venous thrombosis, and one was aPLA positive at all time points (newly diagnosed APS). Of these 9/101 patients, 55.6% were transiently aPLA positive at discharge only, compared to 26.1% without a history of thrombosis (p = 0.041). Patients with severe forms of COVID-19 and positive aPLA should receive the same dose and anticoagulant medication regimen as those with negative aPLA because those antibodies are mostly transiently positive and not linked to thrombosis and fatal outcomes.

Evaluation of Frequency, Clinical Correlation, and Antibodies Confirmation Profile in Patients with Suspected Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial and venous thrombotic manifestations and/or pregnancy-related complications in patients with persistent antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies. The introduction of Sapporo's classification criteria allowed uniformity in the classification of this pathology, representing a considerable advance in its diagnosis. However, currently some doubts about the application of these criteria still persist. The aim of this study was to contribute to the better understanding of APS by the assessment of aPL prevalence, the association between clinical and laboratory tests, and evaluation of the aPL confirmatory profile. In this study, 1,179 samples from patients with suspected APS of both genders, without age restrictions, who were advised to test for complete aPL's profile were analyzed. The samples were tested for lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin immunoglobulin (Ig) G/IgM and anti-ß-2-glycoprotein I IgG/IgM antibodies. Patient samples with isolated test requests for analysis and samples from patients under the influence of anticoagulants or in an infectious process were excluded. The overall positivity found was 17.9% and the most frequent aPL was LAC. The antibodies were determined in isolation and in association. The prevalence of triple positivity was 0.8% and double positivity was 1.8%. Positivity was higher in inpatient/emergency services compared with outpatient services. There was a higher positivity in individuals over 41 years, males, patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, kidney complications, and deep vein thrombosis/thrombophlebitis. The positivity confirmation with second sample was 39.5% and the confirmation profile shows that 50.6% of samples confirmed with same positivity profile; 17.3% with a different profile and regarding to these, 2.5% of the samples confirmed positivity with a different antibody from the previously detected. This study suggests that the aPL's positivity tends to increase with age, showing that the aPL's testing should be avoided during an acute event and reinforces the need for complete aPL laboratory profile in the second sample and subsequent determinations.

Effect of heparanase inhibitor on tissue factor overexpression in platelets and endothelial cells induced by anti-ß2-GPI antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by arterial and/or venous thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity associated with the presence of "anti-phospholipid antibodies." Thrombosis may be the result of a hypercoagulable state related to activation of endothelial cells and platelets by anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2-GPI) antibodies. Anti-ß2-GPI antibodies induce a proinflammatory and procoagulant phenotype in these cells that, after activation, express tissue factor (TF), the major initiator of the clotting cascade, playing a role in thrombotic manifestations. Moreover, TF expression may also be induced by heparanase, an endo-ß-D-glucuronidase, that generates heparan sulfate fragments, regulating inflammatory responses. OBJECTIVES: In this study we analyzed, in human platelets and endothelial cells, the effect of a new symmetrical 2-aminophenyl-benzazolyl-5-acetate derivative (RDS3337), able to inhibit heparanase activity, on signal transduction pathways leading to TF expression triggered by anti-ß2-GPI. METHODS: Platelets and endothelial cells were incubated with affinity purified anti-ß2-GPI after pretreatment with RDS3337. Cell lysates were analyzed for phospho-interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1), phospho-p65 nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and TF by western blot. In addition, platelet activation and secretion by ATP release dosage were evaluated. RESULTS: IRAK phosphorylation and consequent NF-κB activation, as well as TF expression triggered by anti-ß2-GPI treatment were significantly prevented by previous pretreatment with RDS3337. In the same vein, pretreatment with RDS3337 prevented platelet aggregation and ATP release triggered by anti-ß2-GPI antibodies. CONCLUSION: These findings support the view of heparanase involvement in a prothrombotic state related to APS syndrome, suggesting a novel target to regulate overexpression of procoagulant protein(s).