RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Conventional rigid laparoscopic instruments offer five degrees of freedom (DOF). Robotic instruments add two independent DOFs allowing unconstrained directional steering. Several nonrobotic instruments have been developed with the additional DOFs, but with these devices, surgeon's wrist movements are not intuitively transmitted into tip movements. In this study, a new articulated instrument has been evaluated. The aim of the study was to compare learning curves and performances of conventional laparoscopic instruments, the da Vinci system and Steerable devices in a crossover study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 16 medical students without any laparoscopic experience were trained for 27 h to operate all of a rigid, a robotic, and a new Steerable instrument in a random order. Learning curves and ultimate experience scores were determined for each instrument. Strain in wrist and shoulders was assessed with a visual analog score. RESULTS: Performing the suturing task with rigid and robot instruments required 4 h of training, compared with 6 h to master the Steerable instrument. After 9 h of training with each instrument, completing the complex suturing pattern required 662 ± 308 s with rigid instruments, 279 ± 90 s with the da Vinci system, and 279 ± 53 s with the Steerable instrument. Pain scores were significantly higher after using the rigid instruments compared with the Steerable instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission of torque and the presence of additional two DOFs in combination with reduced crosstalk significantly improved the instrument dexterity where the Steerable platform is concerned. Although the learning curve is longer, once mastered, it provides enhanced surgical freedom.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/fisiología , Laparoscopía/educación , Curva de Aprendizaje , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/educación , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Competencia Clínica , Estudios Cruzados , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Ergonomía , Femenino , Antebrazo/fisiología , Humanos , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Masculino , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Técnicas de Sutura/educación , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación , Muñeca/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Objective. The introduction of advanced endoscopic systems, such as the Storz Image1S and the Olympus Endoeye, heralds a new era of 3-dimensional (3D) visualization. The aim of this report is to provide a comprehensive overview of the neurophysiology of 3D view, its relevance in videoscopy, and to quantify the benefit of the new 3D technologies for both rigid and articulated instruments. Method. Sixteen medical students without any laparoscopic experience were trained each for a total of 27 hours. Proficiency scores were determined for rigid and articulated instruments under 2D and 3D visualization conditions. Results. A reduction in execution time of 14%, 28%, and 36% was seen for the rigid instruments, the da Vinci, and Steerable instruments, respectively. A reduction in errors of 84%, 92%, and 87% was seen for the rigid instruments, the da Vinci, and Steerable instruments, respectively. Conclusion. 3D visualization greatly augments endoscopic procedures. The advanced endoscopic systems employed in the recent study caused no visual fatigue or discomfort. The benefit of 3D was most distinct with articulated instruments.
Asunto(s)
Astenopía/etiología , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional/instrumentación , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Bélgica , Competencia Clínica , Evaluación Educacional , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Estudiantes de Medicina , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is currently a reality in surgical practice, and many endeavors have been made to extend its application also in pediatric surgery. In the absence of easy access to a robotic surgical system, new devices have been developed to offer a valid alternative such as wristed instruments. These differ from conventional laparoscopic instruments owing to a wrist-like mechanism at the tip, which faithfully reproduces the movements of the surgeon's hands, regaining more movement's degrees; Methods: We present two case reports in which the patients were subjected to minimally invasive procedures with aid of wristed instruments, followed by a review of the literature regarding the devices commonly marketed; Results: Articulated or wristed instruments render the same features seen in robotic surgery, such as major dexterity in smaller spaces, restitution of more natural movements and the ability to get over obstacles in a direct visual line. Our center recently equipped with ArtiSential® articulated instruments and so far, they have proven to be of great value; Conclusions: wristed instruments could represent a standpoint for surgeons wanting to benefit from the advantages of robotic surgery with a cost-sensitive perspective.