The Upper Common Pathway in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence and Current Perspectives.

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common form of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and its diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have been well-established. Traditionally, AVNRT is understood to be an intranodal reentry having two bystander pathways; the upper common pathway (UCP) which connects to the atrium and the lower common pathway which connects to the ventricle. However, the existence of the UCP remains a subject of ongoing debate. The assertion of the UCP's presence is supported by electrophysiological evidence suggesting that the atrium is not essential for the perpetuation of AVNRT. Nonetheless, numerous anatomical studies have failed to identify any structure that could be conclusively designated as the UCP. The histological and electrophysiological characteristics of the slow and fast pathways, which are the core components of AVNRT, suggest the inclusion of atrial myocardium in the reentry circuit. While clear interpretation of these discrepancies remains elusive, potential explanations may be derived from existing evidence and recent research findings concerning the actual AVNRT circuit.

The optimal slow pathway ablation site in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia cases with an inferiorly located His bundle.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal slow pathway (SP) ablation site in cases with an inferiorly located His bundle (HIS) remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 45 patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, the relationship between the HIS location and successful SP ablation site was assessed in electroanatomical maps. We assessed the location of the SP ablation site relative to the bottom of the coronary sinus ostium in the superior-to-inferior (SPSI), anterior-to-posterior (SPAP), and right-to-left (SPRL) directions. The HIS location was assessed in the same manner. The HIS location in the superior-to-inferior direction (HISSI), SPSI, SPAP, and SPRL were 17.7 ± 6.4, 1.7 ± 6.4, 13.6 ± 12.3, and -1.0 ± 13.0 mm, respectively. The HISSI was positively correlated with SPSI (R2 = 0.62; P < .01) and SPAP (R2 = 0.22; P < .01), whereas it was not correlated with SPRL (R2 = 0.01; P = .65). The distance between the HIS and SP ablation site was 17.7 ± 6.4 mm and was not affected by the location of HIS. The ratio of the amplitudes of atrial and ventricular potential recorded at the SP ablation site did not differ between the high HIS group (HISSI ≥ 13 mm) and low HIS group (HISSI < 13 mm) (0.10 ± 0.06 vs. 0.10 ± 0.06; P = .38). CONCLUSION: In cases with an inferiorly located HIS, SP ablation should be performed at a lower and more posterior site than in typical cases.

Junctional rhythm during cryoablation for typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Cryoablation is being used as an alternative to radiofrequency (RF) ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) owing to the lower risk of atrioventricular block (AVB) compared to RF ablation. Junctional rhythm often occurs during successful application of RF ablation for AVNRT. In contrast, junctional rhythm has rarely been reported to occur during cryoablation. This retrospective study evaluated the characteristics of junctional rhythm during cryoablation for typical AVNRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study included 127 patients in whom successful cryoablation of typical AVNRT was performed. Patients diagnosed with atypical AVNRT were excluded. Junctional rhythm appeared during cryofreezing in 22 patients (17.3%). These junctional rhythms appeared due to cryofreezing at the successful site in the early phase within 15 s of commencement of cooling. Transient complete AVB was observed in 10 of 127 patients (7.9%), and it was noted that atrioventricular conduction improved immediately after cooling was stopped in these 10 patients. No junctional rhythm was observed before the appearance of AVB. No recurrence of tachycardia was confirmed in patients in whom junctional rhythm occurred by cryofreezing at the successful site. CONCLUSION: Occurrence of junctional rhythms during cryoablation is not so rare and can be considered a criterion for successful cryofreezing. Furthermore, junctional rhythm may be associated with low risk of recurrent tachycardia.

Catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with an irrigated contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter.

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) slow pathway modification for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is traditionally performed using a 4-mm nonirrigated (NI) RF ablation catheter. Slow pathway modification using irrigated, contact-force sensing (ICFS) RFA catheters has been described in case reports, but the outcomes have not been systematically evaluated. METHODS: Acute procedural outcomes of 200 consecutive patients undergoing slow pathway modification for AVNRT were analyzed. A 3.5-mm ICFS RFA catheter (ThermoCool SmartTouch STSF, Biosense Webster, Inc.) was utilized in 134 patients, and a 4-mm NI RFA catheter (EZ Steer, Biosense Webster, Inc.) was utilized in 66 patients. Electroanatomic maps were retrospectively analyzed in a blinded fashion to determine the proximity of ablation lesions to the His region. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of patients in both groups were similar. Total RF time was significantly lower in the ICFS group compared to the NI group (5.53 ± 4.6 vs. 6.24 ± 4.9 min, p = 0.03). Median procedure time was similar in both groups (ICFS, 108.0 (87.5-131.5) min vs. NI, 100.0 (85.0-125.0) min; p = 0.2). Ablation was required in closer proximity to the His region in the NI group compared to the ICFS group (14.4 ± 5.9 vs. 16.7 ± 6.4 mm, respectively, p = 0.01). AVNRT was rendered noninducible in all patients, and there was no arrhythmia recurrence during follow-up in both groups. Catheter ablation was complicated by AV block in one patient in the NI group. CONCLUSION: Slow pathway modification for catheter ablation of AVNRT using an ICFS RFA catheter is feasible, safe, and may facilitate shorter duration ablation while avoiding ablation in close proximity to the His region.

Retrograde fast pathway cryoablation inside the coronary sinus for slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is accompanied by enlarged coronary sinus (CS) and deformation of the triangle of Koch. This makes anatomical evaluation of the atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways difficult. METHODS: We attempted cryoablation of retrograde fast pathway located in the enlarged CS roof of PLSVC for slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) induced by inadvertent antegrade fast pathway elimination during ablation of left atrial tachycardia. RESULTS: Slow-fast AVNRT was successfully eliminated without AV block progression. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case of successful retrograde fast pathway ablation of the CS ostial roof for slow-fast AVNRT with PLSVC.

Catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, when AVNRT presented as a fetus or infant.

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) does not commonly present during infancy. Although relative safety of catheter ablation of AVNRT has been demonstrated in pediatrics, this procedure is rarely indicated in children <15 kg. METHODS: Retrospective review of seven cases of AVNRT that presented in children younger than 1 year of age and required catheter ablation for definitive management. Electrophysiology (EP) study was planned with two or three catheters. Area of ablation determined by voltage mapping, propagation sinus wave collision and slow pathway potential location. Ablation performed with cryothermal energy. No fluoroscopy was used. RESULTS: Presentation ranged from 36 weeks of gestation to 11 months of age. Two presented in fetal life and two in the neonatal period. The median age of ablation was 20 months (range 17-31 months). The median weight at ablation was 11.4 kg (range 8.9-14.9 kg). Median follow-up time was 16 months. All had typical AVNRT. The median tachycardia cycle length was 216 ms. 100% successful rate using cryoablation. No complications. No recurrence of tachycardia during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Slow AV nodal pathway cryoablation may be safely performed, with good short and medium-term outcomes in patients under 15 kg.

Rationale for and design of a multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study to assess efficacy and safety of intranasal etripamil for the conversion of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

Presently, acute pharmacological termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) unresponsive to patient-initiated vagal maneuvers requires in-hospital intervention. Etripamil, a fast-acting, nondihydropyridine, L-type calcium channel blocker, is formulated as an intranasal spray to rapidly terminate atrioventricular (AV) nodal-dependent PSVT in a medically unsupervised setting. The NODE-301 study did not meet its prespecified primary end point of PSVT conversion over 5 hours following a single dose of etripamil 70 mg. However, analysis at earlier time points demonstrated etripamil treatment effect during the first 30 minutes, consistent with its expected rapid onset and short duration of action. This led to the design of the RAPID study, which includes a new dosing regimen (up to 2 etripamil 70 mg doses separated by 10 minutes) to increase the exposure and pharmacodynamic effect of etripamil. The primary objective of RAPID (NCT03464019) is to determine if etripamil self-administered by patients is superior to placebo in terminating PSVT in an at-home setting. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety of etripamil when self-administered by patients without medical supervision. Additional efficacy end points include the proportion of patients requiring additional medical intervention in an emergency department to terminate PSVT and patient-reported outcomes. After successfully completing a test dose to assess the safety of 2 70 mg doses of etripamil during sinus rhythm, approximately 500 patients will be randomized 1:1 to etripamil or placebo to accrue 180 positively adjudicated AV nodal-dependent PSVT events for treatment with the study drug. Etripamil may offer a new alternative to the current in-hospital treatment modality, providing for safe and effective at-home termination of PSVT.

Late pacemaker implantation after atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation (CA) of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is associated with late pacemakers for AV block (AVB). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the pooled incidence of late pacemakers for AVB after CA of AVNRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Relevant studies were identified from four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Trial Register) from inception to 2022. A random effects model was used to calculate the odds of late pacemakers in CA of AVNRT compared to atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT). Of 533 articles screened, 13 were included in systematic review. CA for AVNRT was performed in 16 471 patients (mean age 54 ± 17 years, 63% females), of which 68 (0.4%) underwent pacemaker implantation for late AVB. Meta-analysis was performed in 5 of the 13 studies (mean follow-up duration 7 ± 4 years). Patients who underwent CA of AVNRT were older (58 ± 17 vs. 52 ± 20 years, p < .001), and more likely female (60% vs. 41%, p < .001) than AVRT. Pooled estimates of late pacemakers for AVB were higher in CA of AVNRT than AVRT (0.5% vs. 0.2%, p = .006), with CA in AVNRT associated with almost twofold increased odds of late pacemakers indicated for AVB (odds ratio: 1.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-3.47, p = .027) compared to AVRT. CONCLUSION: AVNRT ablation is safe but associated with a low but definitely increased risk of requiring pacing in the later years due to AVB. This association is confirmed by pooling over 16 000 AVNRT patients receiving clinically indicated ablation and is helpful in providing informed consent for prospective patients undergoing ablation for AVNRT.

The advantage of the mini-electrode-equipped catheter for the radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Novel ablation catheters equipped with mini-electrodes (ME) offer high resolution mapping for target tissue. This study aimed to evaluate the mapping performance and efficacy of ME catheters in radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias (PSVTs). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 136 patients undergoing RFA of PSVT including 76 patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and 60 patients with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) or Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. Patients were randomized to the ME group (ablation using ME catheters) or the control group (ablation using conventional catheters). The number of ablation attempt and cumulative ablation time to ablation endpoints, which was defined as an emergence of junctional rhythm in AVNRT or accessory pathway (AP) block in AVRT/WPW syndromes were compared. RESULTS: During ablation procedures, discrete slow pathway or AP electrograms were found in 27 (39.7%) patients in the ME group and 13 (19.1%) patients in the control group. The primary study outcomes were significantly lower in the ME group (ablation attempt number: 2.0 [1-4] vs. 3.0 [2-7] in the ME and control group, p = .032; ablation time: 23.5 [5.0-111.5] vs. 64.5 [16.0-185.0] s, p = .013). According to the PSVT diagnosis, ablation time to junctional rhythm was significantly shorter in the ME group in AVNRT. In AVRT/WPW syndrome, both ablation attempt number and ablation time to AP block were nonsignificantly lower in the ME group. CONCLUSION: The novel ME catheter was advantageous for identifying pathway potentials and reducing initial ablation attempt number and ablation time to reach acute ablation endpoint for PSVTs (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04215640).

Atrioventricular Ring Tachycardias: Atypical Fast-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia and Atrial Tachycardia Share a Common Arrhythmogenic Substrate-A Unifying Proposal.

Our understanding of the variants of slow pathway (SP) and associated atypical atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (NRT) is still growing. We have identified variants extending outside Koch's triangle along the tricuspid annulus, including superior, superoanterior and inferolateral right atrial SP and associated atypical, fast-slow AVNRT. We review the history of each variant, their electrophysiological characteristics and related atypical AVNRT, and their treatment by catheter ablation. We focused our efforts on organizing the published information, as well as some unpublished, reliable data, and show the pitfalls of electrophysiological observations, along with keys to the diagnosis of atypical AVNRT. The superior-type of fast-slow AVNRT mimics adenosine-sensitive atrial tachycardia originating near the AV node and can be successfully treated by ablation of a superior SP form the right side of the perihisian region or from the non-coronary sinus of Valsalva. Fast-slow AVNRT using a superoanterior or inferolateral right atrial SP also mimics atrial tachycardia originating from the tricuspid annulus. We summarize the similarities among these variants of SP, and the origin of the atrial tachycardias, including their anatomical distributions and electrophysiological and pharmacological characteristics. Moreover, based on recent basic research reporting the presence of node-like AV ring tissue encircling the annuli in adult hearts, we propose the term "AV ring tachycardia" to designate the tachycardias that share the AV ring tissue as a common arrhythmogenic substrate. This review should help the readers recognize rare types of SP variants and associated AVNRT, and diagnose and cure these complex tachycardias. We hope, with this proposal of a unified tachycardia designation, to open a new chapter in clinical electrophysiology.

Inducibility of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and ectopic atrial tachycardia in children under general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: In children, invasive electrophysiological studies (EPS) and radiofrequency catheter ablations (RFA) of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) are often performed under general anesthesia. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) must be inducible during EPS as reliable diagnosis and subsequent therapy are not possible in sinus rhythm. This study aims to assess the problem of noninducible AVNRT and EAT under general anesthesia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Anesthesia protocols of 166 patients undergoing EPS were retrospectively analyzed. 122 AVNRT patients were compared to 22 whose tachycardia was not inducible but probably due to an AVNRT mechanism. Another 16 patients with inducible EAT were compared to 6 whose EAT appeared on surface ECG but not during EPS. Demographic characteristics were similar among all groups. Inducibility did not differ (p = .42) between AVNRT patients with inhalational anesthesia (sevoflurane and/or nitrous oxide) and patients with intravenous anesthesia (propofol with/without remifentanil). The EAT group exhibited lower inducibility under intravenous anesthesia (64%) than under inhalational (88%), however without significance (p = .35). CONCLUSION: Tachycardia induction succeeds with similar frequency under both inhalational and intravenous general anesthesia in children with AVNRT. In children with EAT, inhalational anesthesia is associated with a trend towards better inducibility.

Discrimination of atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from atrial tachycardia by the V-A-A-V response.

INTRODUCTION: The electrophysiological discrimination between fast-slow (F/S-) atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (NRT) and atrial tachycardia (AT) originating from the interatrial septum remains challenging. While a V-A-A-V response may occur immediately after ventricular induction or entrainment of either tachycardia, the electrophysiological dissimilarities in that response between the two tachycardias remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify a diagnostic indicator discriminating F/S-AVNRT from AT by examining the difference in the V-A-A-V response between the two tachycardias. METHODS: This retrospective study included 17 patients with F/S-AVNRT [seven with common-form F/S-AVNRT using a typical slow pathway (SP) and 10 with superior type F/S-AVNRT using a superior SP] and 10 patients with reentrant AT. All 27 patients presented with long RP supraventricular tachycardia and an initial V-A-A-V response upon ventricular induction or entrainment. The V-A-A-V response in patients with F/S-AVNRT was due to dual atrial responses. We measured the interval between the first (A1) and second atrial electrogram (A2) of V-A-A-V and calculated ΔAA by subtracting A1-A2 from the tachycardia cycle length. RESULTS: V-A-A-V responses were observed most often upon ventricular induction of F/S-AVNRT (6 ± 5 times) as well as AT (6 ± 6 times; p = .87). The V-A-A-V response upon ventricular entrainment was observed in a single patient with F/S-AVNRT versus 10 all patients with AT (p < .001). ΔAA ranged between -80 and 228 ms in F/S-AVNRT and between -184 and 26 ms in AT. A ΔAA > 26 ms predicted a diagnosis of F/S-AVNRT with a 76% sensitivity and 100% specificity, while a ΔAA <-80 ms predicted a diagnosis of AT with a 50% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: ΔAA is a useful, confirmatory, diagnostic indicator of F/S-AVNRT versus AT associated with the V-A-A-V response.

Right-sided Mahaim-mediated tachycardia combined with atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and left free wall accessory pathway: A case report.

A 37-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with paroxysmal palpitation for half year. A previous electrogram showed a narrow complex tachycardia. Electrophysiologic study (EPS) found a concealed left-sided free wall pathway accessory. In addition, a transseptal approach was used for radiofrequency ablation. After successful ablation, EPS induced a wide complex tachycardia and a narrow complex tachycardia. The wide complex tachycardia was diagnosed as a right-sided Mahaim fiber atriofascicular accessory pathway, and the narrow complex tachycardia was diagnosed as atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Then, the right-sided Mahaim fiber atriofascicular accessory pathway and atypical AVNRT were successfully ablated. Herein, we report a rare case of a concealed left-sided accessory pathway combined with a right atriofascicular Mahaim fiber and atypical AVNRT.

Electrogram characteristics at successful cryoablation sites in slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

PURPOSE: Cryoablation is a safe alternative to radiofrequency (RF) ablation for slow-fast atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT); however, optimal electrogram parameters for site selection remain unknown. We retrospectively investigated local electrograms for slow pathway (SP) modification in cryoablation. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients with slow-fast AVNRT who underwent cryoablation using a 6-mm-tip catheter were enrolled. Electrogram parameters for sites of successful SP modification (success-sites) were investigated; these included the interval between atrial activation at His and the last deflection of SP potential, defined as the His(A)-SPP interval. In 8 patients, 3-dimensional mapping by multi-electrode catheter was performed pre-ablation for more detailed SP assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 45 patients had successful SP modification by 1 cycle of freeze-thaw-freeze cryoablation at a single site with a low amplitude and fragmented SP potential. Among a total of 76 cryoablation sites in all patients, the His(A)-SPP interval at success-sites (45 sites) was significantly longer than that at unsuccess-sites (31 sites) (86 ± 9 vs.78 ± 10 msec, p < 0.0001). The AV amplitude ratio was not significantly different between success-and unsuccess-sites (0.21 ± 0.22 vs.0.25 ± 0.23, p = 0.429). The cutoff value of the His(A)-SPP interval for successful cryoablation was 82 msec with a sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.71 (AUC: 0.739; 95%CI: 0.626-0.852; p < 0.0001). Three-dimensional mapping in all 8 patients showed that sites with the most delayed atrial activation and the last deflection of the fragmented SP potential within the Koch's triangle coincided with success-sites. CONCLUSION: A longer His(A)-SPP interval and fractionated SP potential were characteristics of successful cryoablation for SP modification in slow-fast AVNRT.

Transitioning from Radiofrequency Ablation to Cryoablation for Treatment of Pediatric Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: A Single Tertiary Center Experience.

Catheter ablation of the slow pathway is the recommended treatment for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in children. Both radiofrequency ablation (RF) and cryoablation (CA) have been used for this purpose. In this report, we describe our experience during the transition period from RF to CA for the treatment of pediatric AVNRT. Between January 2012 and August 2021, a retrospective evaluation was conducted of the clinical features, procedural outcomes, and follow-ups of pediatric AVNRT patients who underwent catheter ablation at a pediatric electrophysiology center. The catheter ablation outcomes of 89 pediatric AVNRT patients were evaluated: 29 patients were ablated using RF (RF group) and 60 patients were ablated using CA (CA group). No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of gender, age, weight, and success and recurrence rates. The procedure duration and total lesion numbers were statistically significantly lower in the RF group compared with the CA group (86.67 ± 45.8 and 156.1 ± 37.7 min; p = 0.01, 4 [3-6] and p < 0.01, 8 [7-9] lesions, respectively). Catheter ablation was successful in all patients. There were no permanent complete atrioventricular blocks in both groups. A total of six patients (6.8%) developed recurrences. The cryoablation of pediatric AVNRT is a safe and effective procedure with comparable acute and mid-term follow-up success rates compared with RF, even during a period of transition from RF to CA.

Cryofreezing for slow-pathway modification in patients with slow-fast AVNRT: Efficacy, safety, and electroanatomical relation between sites of transient AV block and sites of successful cryoablation.

INTRODUCTION: Cryoablation has emerged as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation for treating atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryoapplication at sites within the mid/high septal region of Koch's triangle and the relation between sites of transient AV block (AVB) and sites of successful cryoablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Included were 45 consecutive patients undergoing slow-fast AVNRT cryoablation. Initial delivery of cryoenergy was to the mid-septal to high septal region of Koch's triangle. Transient AVB occurred during cryoenergy delivery in 62% (28/45) of patients. Median distance between sites at which cryofreezing successfully eliminated slow pathway conduction and sites of AVB was 4.0 (3.25-5.0) mm. Sites of successful cryoablation tended to be to the left and inferior to the AVB sites. The atrial/ventricular electrogram ratio was significantly lower at sites of successful cryoablation than at AVB sites (0.25 [0.17-0.56] vs. 0.80 [0.36-1.25], p < .001). Delayed discrete or fractionated atrial electrograms were recorded more frequently at sites of successful cryoablation than at AVB sites (78% vs. 20%, p < .001). No persistent AV conduction disturbance occurred, and 96% (43/45) of patients showed absence of recurrence at a median follow-up time of 25.0 months. CONCLUSION: Cryoablation of slow-fast AVNRT and targeting the mid/high septal region of Koch's triangle was highly successful. AVB frequently emerged near the site at which the slow pathway was eliminated but always resolved by regulating the energy delivery under careful monitoring, and it may be distinguishable by its local electrogram features.

Gender associated disparities in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: A review article.

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common sustained supraventricular arrhythmias. An understanding of gender-related differences in AVNRT epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, outcome, and complications can help guide a more effective diagnosis and treatment of the condition. The study aimed to perform a review of the available literature regarding all aspects of gender-related differences of AVNRT. We focused on all aspects of gender-related differences regarding AVNRT between men and women. A literature search was performed using Google Scholar, PubMed, Springer, Ovid, and Science Direct. Many investigations have demonstrated that the prevalence of AVNRT exhibited a twofold women-to-men predominance. The potential mechanism behind this difference due to sex hormones and autonomic tone. Despite being more common in women, there is a delay in offering and performing the first-line therapy (catheter ablation) compared to men. There were no significant gender-related discrepancies in patients who underwent ablation therapy for AVNRT, regarding the acute success rate of the procedure, long-term success rate, and recurrence of AVNRT. AVNRT is more common in women due to physiological factors such as sex hormones and autonomic tone. Catheter ablation is equally safe and efficacious in men and women; however, the time between the onset of symptoms and ablation is significantly prolonged in women. It is important for the medical community to be aware of this discrepancy and to strive to eliminate such disparities that are not related to patients' choices.

Pacing site- and rate-dependent shortening of retrograde conduction time over the slow pathway after atrial entrainment of fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: We tested our hypothesis that atrial entrainment pacing (EP) of a) the common-type (com-) fast-slow (F/S-) atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) using a typical slow pathway (SP), or b) the superior-type (sup-) F/S-AVNRT using a superior SP, both modify the retrograde conduction time across the SP immediately after termination of EP (retro-SP-time). METHODS: We measured the difference in the His-atrial interval (HA difference) immediately after cessation of EP, performed at 2 ± 2 rates from the high right atrium (HA[1]-HRA) versus from the proximal coronary sinus (HA[1]-CS) in 17 patients with com-F/S-AVNRT and 11 patients with sup-F/S-AVNRT. We also measured the atrial-His and HA intervals of the first and second cycles immediately after cessation of EP and during stable tachycardia. RESULTS: Unequal responses, defined as a ≥ 20-ms HA difference at ≥1 EP rates, were observed in 16 patients (57%), including 7 with com- and 9 with sup-F/S-AVNRT. Irrespective of the EP rate, all unequal responses of com-F/S-AVNRT were due to a shorter HA[1]-CS than HA[1]-HRA, with a mean 34 ± 11 ms HA difference, whereas all unequal responses of sup-F/S-AVNRT were due to a longer HA[1]-CS than HA[1]-HRA, with a mean 49 ± 25 ms HA difference. The unequal responses resolved within two cycles after the cessation of EP. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a little-known pacing site- and pacing rate-dependent shortening of the retro-SP-time.

Telltale termination of an A-on-V tachycardia with two blocked atrial activations: What is the mechanism?

The termination of tachycardia may provide important clues toward the mechanism of the tachycardia and that close vigilance may clinch the diagnosis before proceeding to other pacing maneuvers.

Transaortic cryoablation of uncommon atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia after Senning and Rastelli operations.

A 36-years-old woman with a congenital corrected transposition of the great arteries, who underwent Senning and Rastelli operations, was admitted with a symptomatic supraventricular tachycardia. During an electrophysiological study, uncommon atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia was induced. The coronary veins and coronary sinus did not connect to the systemic venous atrium. The His bundle electrogram (HBE) was recorded at the anterior septum of the mitral valve via the aorta. The target of ablation was the site of the earliest atrial activation during the tachycardia, 5 mm posterior to the AV node, and a successful cryoablation was performed using a transaortic approach. Both the antegrade and retrograde conduction of the slow AV nodal pathway was eliminated.