A Narrative Review on C3 Glomerulopathy: A Rare Renal Disease.

In April 2012, a group of nephrologists organized a consensus conference in Cambridge (UK) on type II membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and decided to use a new terminology, "C3 glomerulopathy" (C3 GP). Further knowledge on the complement system and on kidney biopsy contributed toward distinguishing this disease into three subgroups: dense deposit disease (DDD), C3 glomerulonephritis (C3 GN), and the CFHR5 nephropathy. The persistent presence of microhematuria with or without light or heavy proteinuria after an infection episode suggests the potential onset of C3 GP. These nephritides are characterized by abnormal activation of the complement alternative pathway, abnormal deposition of C3 in the glomeruli, and progression of renal damage to end-stage kidney disease. The diagnosis is based on studying the complement system, relative genetics, and kidney biopsies. The treatment gap derives from the absence of a robust understanding of their natural outcome. Therefore, a specific treatment for the different types of C3 GP has not been established. Recommendations have been obtained from case series and observational studies because no randomized clinical trials have been conducted. Current treatment is based on corticosteroids and antiproliferative drugs (cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil), monoclonal antibodies (rituximab) or complement inhibitors (eculizumab). In some cases, it is suggested to include sessions of plasma exchange.

Clinical course and outcome after kidney transplantation in patients with C3 glomerulonephritis due to CFHR5 nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Complement factor H-related protein 5 (CFHR5) nephropathy is an inherited renal disease characterized by microscopic and synpharyngitic macroscopic haematuria, C3 glomerulonephritis and renal failure. It is caused by an internal duplication of exons 2-3 within the CFHR5 gene resulting in dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of transplanted patients with this rare familial nephropathy remain unknown. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series study of 17 kidney transplant patients with the established founder mutation, followed-up over a span of 30 years. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) age of patients at the time of the study and at transplantation was 58.6 ± 9.9 and 46.7 ± 8.8 years, respectively. The 10- and 15-year patient survival rates were 100 and 77.8%, respectively. Proteinuria was present in 33.3% and microscopic haematuria in 58.3% of patients with a functional graft. Serum complement levels were normal in all. 'Confirmed' and 'likely' recurrence of CFHR5 nephropathy were 16.6 and 52.9%, respectively; however, 76.5% of patients had a functional graft after a median of 120 months post-transplantation. Total recurrence was not associated with graft loss (P = 0.171), but was associated with the presence of microscopic haematuria (P = 0.001) and proteinuria (P = 0.018). Graft loss was associated with the presence of proteinuria (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: We describe for the first time the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with CFHR5 nephropathy post-transplantation. Despite the recurrence of CFHR5 nephropathy, we provide evidence for a long-term favourable outcome and support the continued provision of kidney transplantation as a renal replacement option in patients with CFHR5 nephropathy.