Contraindications in national guidelines for vaginal breech delivery at term: Comparison, consensus, and controversy.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal mode of delivery for vaginal breech presentation remains a clinical dilemma. Planned vaginal delivery offers maternal advantages because it avoids major abdominal surgery and has no consequences for following pregnancies, while elective cesarean delivery proves advantageous for the neonate because adverse outcomes are less frequent. Patient selection for vaginal breech delivery is important based on the individual risk balance. A lack of consensus exists regarding the specific contraindications for vaginal breech delivery, largely due to limited scientific evidence. This systematic review aims to give an overview of contraindications for vaginal breech delivery, as presented in guidelines, analyze relevant literature, and offer evidence-based recommendations for the contraindications stated in the guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To identify national guidelines PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, NICE, UpToDate, and ClinicalKey were searched using two keywords: "breech presentation" and "vaginal delivery." We systematically reviewed the literature for existing evidence for contraindications for term vaginal breech delivery. The following databases were searched: PubMed (April 2024), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE (1947 to 2024). RESULTS: Our search identified eight guidelines that stated a total of 11 contraindications for vaginal breech delivery. Among these guidelines, agreement was limited, with the sole consensus in all guidelines on the contraindication of footling breech. Our comprehensive literature search yielded 43 articles discussing 14 potential contraindications. We found supportive evidence for 7 of 11 contraindications from the guidelines, with only substantial and satisfactory evidence for two contraindications. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study underscore the lack of consensus among national guidelines regarding contraindications for term vaginal breech delivery. Furthermore, we found a notable lack of substantial scientific evidence to support these contraindications. In light of these findings, we suggest a reduced list of contraindications in vaginal breech deliveries.

Tape Eyelid Closure: An Effective Solution for Nocturnal Lagophthalmos in Patients with Ptosis and Poor Bell's Phenomenon.

BACKGROUND: Poor Bell's phenomenon is often considered a relative contraindication for ptosis surgery, as it increases the risk of corneal exposure and dry eye symptoms after surgery. However, the Bell's phenomenon may vary in different individuals and sleep stages, making it inaccurate to predict the position of the eye during sleep based on awake examination. This study aimed to investigate the role of Bell's phenomenon in ptosis surgery and the management of nocturnal lagophthalmos. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series of 23 patients with ptosis and poor Bell's phenomenon who underwent different surgical techniques at Xijing Hospital from April 2020 to June 2021. We assessed Bell's phenomenon at different stages of sleep and collected data on ptosis degree, surgical approach, lagophthalmos, complications, and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the total 23 patients originally considered for study, 9 with frontalis muscle advancement technique, 8 with conjoint fascial sheath suspension, 4 with levator resection technique, and 2 with levator aponeurosis plication technique. All patients achieved satisfactory correction of ptosis. One patient had prolonged lagophthalmos and underwent reoperation to lower the eyelid height. Other complications were minor and resolved with conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: We conclude that poor Bell's phenomenon is not a relative contraindication for ptosis surgery. Nocturnal lagophthalmos should be monitored after ptosis surgery regardless of the Bell's phenomenon results. Tape eyelid closure can be an effective solution to protect the corneal surface during nocturnal lagophthalmos. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Surgical outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with stable systemic disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical outcome in terms of safety, efficacy, predictability, and retreatment rate of LASIK surgery in patients with controlled systemic diseases in comparison with healthy individuals. METHODS: The retrospective study included data from 1936 eyes of 976 patients with stable systemic diseases who underwent LASIK surgery between January 2016 and June 2019. The safety, efficacy, predictability of the surgery, and retreatment rate were evaluated in comparison with a control group comprising 1951 patients. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Statistical analysis was performed using R team and the level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: All treatment groups demonstrated high safety and efficacy indices after LASIK surgery. Furthermore, the study arms demonstrated comparable predictability and retreatment rates to the control group in nearly all cases. Retreatment rates were significantly higher in the rheumatoid arthritis group (p = 0.03), while safety indices were significantly lower in the hay fever group compared to the control group (p = 0.004). No intra- or postoperative sight-threatening complications were documented. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that selected patients with stable systemic conditions can safely undergo LASIK surgery and achieve comparable outcomes to healthy individuals. Further research is needed to better understand the treatment outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Live attenuated vaccines in patients receiving immunosuppressive agents.

The use of live attenuated vaccines in patients with immunosuppressive agents is contraindicated in package inserts and guidelines in Japan and other countries. However, patients receiving immunosuppressants have a high risk of infectious disease becoming severe, and the necessity to prevent infectious disease is high. To date, 2,091 vaccinations have been reported in 25 reports of live attenuated vaccines in people receiving immunosuppressants. Twenty-three patients (1.1%) became infected with the virus strain used in the vaccine, which was varicella virus in 21 patients. No reports have described life-threatening complications. A prospective study at the National Center for Child Health and Development conducted under certain immunological conditions (CD4 cell count ≥ 500/mm3, stimulation index of lymphocyte blast transformation by phytohemagglutinin (PHA) ≥ 101.6, serum immunoglobulin G ≥ 300 mg/dL) confirmed the serological effectiveness and safety. The evidence suggests that live attenuated vaccines can be used even in combination with immunosuppressants. Further evidence must be gathered and immunological criteria investigated to determine the conditions for safe use. Depending on the results of these investigations, the wording in package inserts and guidelines may need to be revised.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindication to oral anticoagulation.

AIMS: This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) compared to standard stroke prevention care for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and contraindication to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in a Swedish healthcare and public sector perspective. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a combined decision tree and cohort Markov model to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime horizon with LAAO compared to standard of care where the treatment effect is based on a recent meta-analysis. According to our analysis, LAAO gives more QALYs than standard of care (7.11 vs. 6.12). Furthermore, LAAO treatment is related to the first-year cost of 14 984 Euro (EUR) and higher average healthcare costs over the lifetime by about 4010 EUR, which gives an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of LAAO vs. standard of care at 4047 EUR per gained QALY. From a public sector perspective, LAAO reduces average costs due to substantial reductions in long-term care and, thus, implies that LAAO is dominant from a public sector perspective (lower average costs and better health outcomes). CONCLUSION: From both Swedish healthcare and public sector perspectives, LAAO can be considered cost-effective compared to standard of care for individuals with AF and contraindication to OAC. However, these results must be confirmed in health economic evaluations alongside the ongoing randomized clinical trials. KEY QUESTION: Is left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) cost-effective for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and contraindication to oral anticoagulation (OAC) compared to the standard of care from a Swedish healthcare and public sector perspective? KEY FINDING: LAAO is associated with lower cost than the standard of care from a public sector perspective and an incremental cost of 4010 Euro from a healthcare perspective. Furthermore, LAAO is related to better health outcomes than the standard of care. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Treatment with LAAO among individuals with AF and contraindication to OAC can be considered as cost-effective compared to the standard of care from a Swedish healthcare and public sector perspective.

[Discussion on the use of occupational contraindication cardiovascular disease in Technical Specifications for Occupational Health Surveillance (GBZ 188-2014)].

Technical Specifications for Occupational Health Surveillance (GBZ 188-2014) has played an important role in screening occupational contraindications and preventing occupational diseases since its implementation. However, during the use of occupational health examination, we found that the use of occupational contraindication on cardiovascular disease was not "homogenized" due to the differences in the understanding of various physical examination institutions. Therefore, this paper mainly discussed the connotation and quantitative standards of organic heart disease, arrhythmia, hypertension in the occupational contraindication cardiovascular disease in the specification for "homogenization".

Use of medication data alone to identify diagnoses and related contraindications: Application of algorithms to close a common documentation gap.

AIMS: Automated checks for medication-related problems have become a cornerstone of medication safety. In many clinical settings medication checks remain confined to drug-drug interactions because only medication data are available in an adequately coded form, leaving possible contraindicated drug-disease combinations unaccounted for. Therefore, we devised algorithms that identify frequently contraindicated diagnoses based on medication patterns related to these diagnoses. METHODS: We identified drugs that are associated with diseases constituting common contraindications based on their exclusive use for these conditions (such as allopurinol for gout or salbutamol for bronchial obstruction). Expert-based and machine learning algorithms were developed to identify diagnoses based on highly specific medication patterns. The applicability, sensitivity and specificity of the approach were assessed by using an anonymized real-life sample of medication and diagnosis data excerpts from 3506 discharge records of geriatric patients. RESULTS: Depending on the algorithm, the desired focus (i.e., sensitivity vs. specificity) and the disease, we were able to identify the diagnoses gout, epilepsy, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure and bronchial obstruction with a specificity of 44.0-99.8% (95% CI 41.7-100.0%) and a sensitivity of 3.8-83.1% (95% CI 1.0-86.1%). Using only medication data, we were able to identify 123 (51.3%) of 240 contraindications identified by experts with access to medication data and diagnoses. CONCLUSION: This study provides a proof of principle that some key diagnosis-related contraindications can be identified based on a patient's medication data alone, while others cannot be identified. This approach offers new opportunities to analyse drug-disease contraindications in community pharmacy or clinical routine data.

Triptan medication use among patients with migraine with contraindications in the US.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the prevalence of triptan use among patients with migraine who have contraindications to triptan usage, and to explore specifics of the medication prescribed, dosage, and route of administration. BACKGROUND: Triptan medications are a mainstay of acute migraine therapy, but little is known about prevalence and patterns of triptan prescribing among patients with contraindications in the United States. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from the IBM Marketscan database to identify patients aged ≥ 18 years with migraine from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, using International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification 10 codes. Contraindications to triptan medications were identified by review of package labels as listed on the US Food and Drug Administration website. Triptan medications were identified from the IBM Micromedex Redbook linked to prescription claims along with route of administration and dosage. RESULTS: Of 1,038,472 individuals diagnosed with migraine, 400,112 (38.5%) were prescribed triptan medication, and of those who were prescribed a triptan, 55,707 (13.9%) had at least one contraindication, with the most common contraindication being cardiac arrhythmia (33,696/400,112 individuals, 8.4%) followed by cerebrovascular disease (14,787/400,112, 3.7%) and coronary artery disease (10,236/400,112, 2.6%). Sumatriptan was the most prescribed triptan (261,736/1,038,472, 25.2%), and the subcutaneous and intranasal routes were more commonly prescribed among those with contraindications compared with those without contraindications. DISCUSSION: A substantial proportion of patients with migraine with contraindications were prescribed triptan medications. These findings call for further research on the outcomes of patients with medical contraindications who are prescribed triptan medications, and for greater clarity in prescribing guidelines about the optimal approach for acute therapy among patients with migraine.

Identification and management of contraindicated drug-drug interactions through pharmaceutical care programs: Experience in direct-acting antivirals therapy.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of pharmaceutical care programs for the management of contraindicated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) therapy. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed at Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital between January 2018 and December 2019. Pharmacists screened DDIs for all hepatitis C patients before DAA therapy. The study outcome included the frequency of contraindicated DDIs, acceptance rate, and cost avoidance of the pharmaceutical care program. RESULTS: A total of 1053 patients were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 67.1 ± 11.9 years. Most patients received therapy with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (37.1%; n = 391), elbasvir/grazoprevir (23.8%; n = 251), or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (21.1%; n = 222). A total of 796 (75.6%) patients received at least one co-medication, with the average number of co-medications being 5.2 per patient (SD: 4.4/patient). In total, 1356 DDIs were identified, with the average DDIs per patient of 1.3 (SD: 1.7). For patients with contraindicated DDIs (2%, n = 102), statins and amiodarone were the most common co-medications. Physicians often accepted pharmacists' recommendations (acceptance rate of 72.5%) or withheld co-medication to avoid severe adverse drug events (ADEs). The estimated cost avoidance of preventable ADEs was USD 14,033 for contraindicated DDIs with pharmaceutical care programs. CONCLUSION: The implementation of pharmaceutical care programs in DAA therapy provides a favorable outcome and substantial cost avoidance.

[Analysis on the detection of suspected occupational diseases and occupational contraindications for benzene workers in Tianjin].

Objective: To investigate the detection of suspected occupational diseases and occupational contraindications for benzene workers in Tianjin. Methods: In June 2020, the occupational health inspection data of 16113 benzene workers in 514 enterprises with benzene hazards in 16 municipal districts in Tianjin from January to December 2019 were included in the analysis. Enterprise information included the employer's region, economic type, industry classification and enterprise scale. Occupational health inspection data for benzene workers during their on-the-job period included routine inspection indicators and benzene special inspection indicators. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between personal general information, occupational history, enterprise information and suspected benzene poisoning and occupational contraindications of benzene workers. Results: There were 16073 benzene workers in the normal group and 24 in the suspected benzene poisoning group. The detection rate of suspected benzene poisoning in females was higher than that in males (χ(2)=8.26, P=0.004) . There was no significant difference in the detection rates of suspected benzene poisoning among different dimensions such as age, length of service, occupational health inspection institution location, employer location, industry classification, economic type, and enterprise scale (P>0.05) . There were 16073 benzene workers in the normal group and 16 in the benzene contraindication group. The detection rate of benzene contraindications for workers in suburban areas where occupational health inspection institutions were located was higher than that in urban areas (χ(2)=9.71, P=0.002) , and there was no significant difference in the detection rates of contraindications for benzene in other dimensions (P>0.05) . Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that female benzene workers were more likely to detect suspected benzene poisoning (OR=3.53, 95%CI: 1.57-7.94, P=0.002) ; benzene workers who received physical examination in suburban occupational health inspection institutions (OR=5.81, 95%CI: 1.94-17.42, P=0.002) , the employer's area was in the suburbs (OR=9.68, 95%CI: 1.23-76.07, P=0.031) , and female workers (OR=3.07, 95%CI: 1.13-8.37, P=0.028) , it was easier to detect occupational contraindications. Conclusion: Female benzene workers with employers located in the suburbs have a higher risk of detecting occupational contraindications, and women are more likely to detect suspected benzene poisoning. The management of benzene operations in the production environment of enterprises in the suburbs of Tianjin and the occupational health monitoring of female workers should be strengthened.

Investigation of the Real-World Situation and Risk Factors Associated with Olanzapine Prescribed to Diabetes Patients by Using a Japanese Claims Database.

Olanzapine is effective for schizophrenia management; however, it is contraindicated in diabetes patients. In addition, olanzapine is useful for treating nausea and vomiting, such as in the case of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Therefore, we hypothesized that the contraindicated prescription of olanzapine likely occurs among cancer patients with diabetes, especially by non-psychiatric physicians. Hence, we conducted a nationwide survey to elucidate the situation of such contraindicated prescriptions and the associated risk factors. We extracted the data of patients who were newly prescribed olanzapine between April 2015 and March 2017 from the health insurance claims database developed by JMDC, Inc., Tokyo. The patients who were prescribed contraindicated olanzapine were defined as those who were prescribed olanzapine after a diagnosis of diabetes and diabetes drug prescription. In all, the data of 7181 patients were analyzed. We evaluated the proportion of diabetes patients who were prescribed contraindicated olanzapine from among those who were prescribed olanzapine. Furthermore, we investigated the background of patients who were prescribed olanzapine for information such as olanzapine prescribers and history of cancer chemotherapy. In all, 100 diabetes patients (1.39%) were prescribed olanzapine. In these patients, the frequency of olanzapine prescription was higher by non-psychiatry/neurology physicians than by psychiatry/neurology physicians (3.25 and 0.85%, respectively). Additionally, all olanzapine prescriptions in cancer chemotherapy-treated diabetes patients were issued by non-psychiatry/neurology physicians. Thus, our study revealed there were diabetes patients who were prescribed olanzapine. Additionally, olanzapine for CINV management was more likely to be a contraindicated prescription.

[Is compression therapy contraindicated for lower leg erysipelas? : Results of a retrospective analysis]. / Ist die Kompressionstherapie bei Erysipel des Unterschenkels kontraindiziert? : Resultate einer retrospektiven Analyse.

In many medical expert recommendations and guidelines, the use of compression therapy for acute erysipelas is designated as a contraindication. Due to the sometimes massive oedema, compression therapy is nevertheless used in some clinics. This led to the question whether compression therapy for erysipelas of the lower leg actually leads to complications due to the acute infection and thus represents a contraindication. For the period 01 January 2018 to 30 June 2019, the records of 56 inpatients with acute erysipelas of the lower leg who received compression therapy in addition to systemic antibiotic therapy were retrospectively evaluated. The duration of inpatient treatment, the infection parameters determined as part of the ward routine and any complications that occurred were evaluated. While treated as inpatients the blood parameters for infection clearly dropped. Compression therapy was started on admission day in 92.9% of patients and continued until discharge. None of the patients showed an increase in fever or clinical signs of sepsis during the hospital stay. In this retrospective analysis it could be shown for the first time that compression therapy does not cause a clinical worsening or trigger a septic clinical picture in patients with acute erysipelas. Therefore, the authors consider the declaration of acute erysipelas as contraindication for compression therapy as not justified.

KDOQI US Commentary on the 2017 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.

Living kidney donation is widely practiced throughout the world. During the past 2 decades, various groups have provided guidance about the evaluation and care of living donors. However, during this time, our knowledge in the field has advanced substantially and many agreed on the need for a comprehensive, unifying document. KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) addressed this issue at an international level with the publication of its clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and care of living kidney donors. The KDIGO work group extensively reviewed the available literature and wrote a series of guideline recommendations using various degrees of evidence when available. As has become recent practice, NKF-KDOQI (National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) convened a work group to provide a commentary on the KDIGO guideline, with a focus on how these recommendations apply in the context of the United States. In the United States, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) guides and regulates the practice of living kidney donation. While the KDIGO guideline for the care of living kidney donors and UNOS policy are similar in most aspects of the care of living kidney donors, several important areas are not consistent or do not align with common practice by US transplantation programs in areas in which UNOS has not set specific policy. For the time being, and recognizing the value of the KDIGO guidelines, US transplantation programs should continue to follow UNOS policy.

A tutorial on dealing with time-varying eligibility for treatment: Comparing the risk of major bleeding with direct-acting oral anticoagulants vs warfarin.

In this tutorial, we focus on the problem of how to define and estimate treatment effects when some patients develop a contraindication and are thus ineligible to receive a treatment of interest during follow-up. We first describe the concept of positivity, which is the requirement that all subjects in an analysis be eligible for all treatments of interest conditional on their baseline covariates, and the extension of this concept in the longitudinal treatment setting. We demonstrate using simulated datasets and regression analysis that under violations of longitudinal positivity, typical associational estimates between treatment over time and the outcome of interest may be misleading depending on the data-generating structure. Finally, we explain how one may define "treatment strategies," such as "treat with medication unless contraindicated," to overcome the problems linked to time-varying eligibility. Finally, we show how contrasts between the expected potential outcomes under these strategies may be consistently estimated with inverse probability weighting methods. We provide R code for all the analyses described.

Comedication prescription patterns and potential for drug-drug interactions with antiretroviral therapy in people living with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in Germany.

PURPOSE: Various first-line recommended antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens have different drug-drug interaction (DDI)/contraindication profiles. The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of potential DDIs/contraindications of real-world prescribed non-ART comedication with first-line recommended ART in people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Germany. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional cohort design was used to collect non-ART comedication prescription data from a representative sample of a German health insurance claims database. PLHIV who were prescribed ART during 2016 were included in the analysis. Patients were stratified by sex, age, comorbidities, and time on ART. Prescribed comedications were used to estimate potential DDIs/contraindications for each recommended first-line ART per patient based on criteria from www.hiv-druginteractions.org. RESULTS: Records from 2680 PLHIV were analyzed. Prescriptions for non-ART comedications were common (mean of seven per patient in the overall population, 10.2 in PLHIV aged 50 years and older). Antiretroviral regimens with the lowest proportion of patients with at least 1 potential DDI/contraindication were unboosted integrase inhibitor, non-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimens that included raltegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (13%), dolutegravir + lamivudine (14%), dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (14%), dolutegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (15%), and bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (19%). Boosted regimens and efavirenz-based regimens presented the highest potential for DDIs/contraindications. CONCLUSIONS: Comedication with potential DDIs/contraindications with ART is frequently prescribed among PLHIV in Germany. Potential risks for DDIs/contraindications vary by ART, with the lowest potential seen in unboosted integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens, including raltegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, followed by three dolutegravir-based regimens.

[Systemic drug treatment during pregnancy]. / Medikamentöse Systemtherapie in der Schwangerschaft.

In clinical routine, treatment of pregnant women is a recurring challenge. The frequent opacity of current studies, lack of reliable sources of information and the general insecurity of pregnant women towards systemic drug treatment leads to difficult clinical decision making. Potent therapies with sufficient clinical experience in terms of safety of application are available for most diseases seen in pregnancy. After careful evaluation of potential benefits and risks of a therapy, not only the optimal choice of a medical treatment, but also adequate control of clinical symptoms and interdisciplinary care are crucial for a safe pregnancy.

[Limits of kinematic alignment and recommendations for its safe application]. / Grenzen des kinematischen Alignments und Empfehlungen für die sichere Anwendung.

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing clinical evidence "pro" kinematic alignment (KA) in primary total knee arthroplasty, the idea of this individualized implant positioning has not (yet) become established throughout the community. Many surgeons have concerns about the safety of the method and the universality of its application. Interestingly, comparative studies with unlimited indications for KA showed only little or no advantage over standard mechanical alignment in contrast to studies with strict indications showing a significant benefit. QUESTION AND METHODOLOGY: This results in a discussion about possible indication limits for KA. The aim of this article is to summarize the current evidence and theoretical considerations regarding ideal and possibly non-ideal patients. Furthermore, the paper describes the "lessons learned" of the past years as a recommendation for safe use of the method. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Based on current evidence, primary varus osteoarthritis appears to be a good indication for KA. A limitation, however, is extra-articular deformities that lead to a pathologically joint line angle. Instabilities of the collateral ligaments are to be considered as a contraindication. In contrast to varus type osteoarthritis, valgus deformities appear to be more critical for KA. Even though there is yet only limited evidence, especially the accompanying extra-articular pathologies of the hip and ankle pose an increased risk of failure. In our opinion, a restricted KA with an individualized component position but neutral overall limb alignment makes sense here. To analyze the suitability of KA and estimate the post-operative component position, weight-bearing long-leg x­rays are recommended. Additional stress radiography is helpful in certain cases, as is the three-dimensional analysis of the anatomy by CT or MRI scans.

[Modern ideas about the professional suitability of employees of regulated professions with middle ear pathology and the possibility of their return to work (analytical review of the literature)]. / Sovremennye predstavleniya o profprigodnosti rabotnikov reglamentirovannykh professii s patologiei srednego ukha i vozmozhnosti ikh vozvrata k trudu (analiticheskii obzor literatury).

Fitness for work in persons with middle ear disease who are exposed to harmful work environment and their possible return to work was analyzed. Fitness for work expertise procedure in the Russian Federation is disclosed in detail. A list of medical contraindications to work in harmful and/or dangerous work environment according to hearing condition is given. Clinical aspects of middle ear diseases in the industry workers are presented and modern ideas about middle ear surgical treatment, it's functional results, documenting technique and outcome calculation are described in detail. Possibility of returning the employee to work is discussed based on all the analyzed materials.

Consistency of listed indications and contraindications between the U.S., the U.K., Japan, and Korea on prescription drug labels.

Inclusion of indications and contraindications in drug labeling is essential for drug approval. Little is known regarding how well new drug information labels agree across countries. To compare the number of indications and contraindications on the labels of drugs in the U.S., U.K., Japan, and Korea, we selected 81 new drugs approved in these countries between 2008 and 2016 and assessed the number of indications and contraindications on each label. Average and median numbers with standard deviations were presented for the 81-drug set, and for subsets grouped according to drug class. Correlation analyses were conducted to estimate Pearson and concordance correlation coefficients. No significant difference was observed across countries in the number of indications, the average being 1.69, 1.67, 1.54, and 1.51 in the U.S., the U.K., Korea, and Japan (p = 0.31), respectively. By contrast, substantial variation was observed in the number of contraindications, the average being 1.54, 2.42, 3.53, and 3.00 in the U.S., the U.K., Korea, and Japan (p < 0.001), respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients comparing contraindications were 0.40, 0.48, and 0.47 for U.S.-U.K., U.S.-Korea, and U.S.-Japan, but 0.83, 0.73, and 0.71 for U.K.-Korea, U.K.-Japan, and Korea-Japan, respectively (p < 0.01). There is consistency in the number of indications, but a substantial discrepancy in contraindications listed in drug labeling across countries. Further study is warranted to improve global harmonization of contraindication listings.