A Comparative Analysis of Data Analysis Tools for Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry.

Data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry-based proteomics generates reproducible proteome data. The complex processing of the DIA data has led to the development of multiple data analysis tools. In this study, we assessed the performance of five tools (OpenSWATH, EncyclopeDIA, Skyline, DIA-NN, and Spectronaut) using six DIA datasets obtained from TripleTOF, Orbitrap, and TimsTOF Pro instruments. By comparing identification and quantification metrics and examining shared and unique cross-tool identifications, we evaluated both library-based and library-free approaches. Our findings indicate that library-free approaches outperformed library-based methods when the spectral library had limited comprehensiveness. However, our results also suggest that constructing a comprehensive library still offers benefits for most DIA analyses. This study provides comprehensive guidance for DIA data analysis tools, benefiting both experienced and novice users of DIA-mass spectrometry technology.

Deep Plasma Proteomics with Data-Independent Acquisition: Clinical Study Protocol Optimization with a COVID-19 Cohort.

Plasma proteomics is a precious tool in human disease research but requires extensive sample preparation in order to perform in-depth analysis and biomarker discovery using traditional data-dependent acquisition (DDA). Here, we highlight the efficacy of combining moderate plasma prefractionation and data-independent acquisition (DIA) to significantly improve proteome coverage and depth while remaining cost-efficient. Using human plasma collected from a 20-patient COVID-19 cohort, our method utilizes commonly available solutions for depletion, sample preparation, and fractionation, followed by 3 liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/MS (LC-MS/MS) injections for a 360 min total DIA run time. We detect 1321 proteins on average per patient and 2031 unique proteins across the cohort. Differential analysis further demonstrates the applicability of this method for plasma proteomic research and clinical biomarker identification, identifying hundreds of differentially abundant proteins at biological concentrations as low as 47 ng/L in human plasma. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with the identifier PXD047901. In summary, this study introduces a streamlined, cost-effective approach to deep plasma proteome analysis, expanding its utility beyond classical research environments and enabling larger-scale multiomics investigations in clinical settings. Our comparative analysis revealed that fractionation, whether the samples were pooled or separate postfractionation, significantly improved the number of proteins quantified. This underscores the value of fractionation in enhancing the depth of plasma proteome analysis, thereby offering a more comprehensive landscape for biomarker discovery in diseases such as COVID-19.

Multispecies Benchmark Analysis for LC-MS/MS Validation and Performance Evaluation in Bottom-Up Proteomics.

We present an instrument-independent benchmark procedure and software (LFQ_bout) for the validation and comparative evaluation of the performance of LC-MS/MS and data processing workflows in bottom-up proteomics. The procedure enables a back-to-back comparison of common and emerging workflows, e.g., diaPASEF or ScanningSWATH, and evaluates the impact of arbitrary and inadequately documented settings or black-box data processing algorithms. It enhances the overall performance and quantification accuracy by recognizing and reporting common quantification errors.

Neat plasma proteomics: getting the best out of the worst.

Plasma proteomics holds immense potential for clinical research and biomarker discovery, serving as a non-invasive "liquid biopsy" for tissue sampling. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics, thanks to improvement in speed and robustness, emerges as an ideal technology for exploring the plasma proteome for its unbiased and highly specific protein identification and quantification. Despite its potential, plasma proteomics is still a challenge due to the vast dynamic range of protein abundance, hindering the detection of less abundant proteins. Different approaches can help overcome this challenge. Conventional depletion methods face limitations in cost, throughput, accuracy, and off-target depletion. Nanoparticle-based enrichment shows promise in compressing dynamic range, but cost remains a constraint. Enrichment strategies for extracellular vesicles (EVs) can enhance plasma proteome coverage dramatically, but current methods are still too laborious for large series. Neat plasma remains popular for its cost-effectiveness, time efficiency, and low volume requirement. We used a test set of 33 plasma samples for all evaluations. Samples were digested using S-Trap and analyzed on Evosep One and nanoElute coupled to a timsTOF Pro using different elution gradients and ion mobility ranges. Data were mainly analyzed using library-free searches using DIA-NN. This study explores ways to improve proteome coverage in neat plasma both in MS data acquisition and MS data analysis. We demonstrate the value of sampling smaller hydrophilic peptides, increasing chromatographic separation, and using library-free searches. Additionally, we introduce the EV boost approach, that leverages on the extracellular vesicle fraction to enhance protein identification in neat plasma samples. Globally, our optimized analysis workflow allows the quantification of over 1000 proteins in neat plasma with a 24SPD throughput. We believe that these considerations can be of help independently of the LC-MS platform used.

Evaluation of PAC and FASP Performance: DIA-Based Quantitative Proteomic Analysis.

The aim of this study was to compare filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) and protein aggregation capture (PAC) starting from a three-species protein mix (Human, Soybean and Pisum sativum) and two different starting amounts (1 and 10 µg). Peptide mixtures were analyzed by data-independent acquisition (DIA) and raw files were processed by three commonly used software: Spectronaut, MaxDIA and DIA-NN. Overall, the highest number of proteins (mean value of 5491) were identified by PAC (10 µg), while the lowest number (4855) was identified by FASP (1 µg). The latter experiment displayed the worst performance in terms of both specificity (0.73) and precision (0.24). Other tested conditions showed better diagnostic accuracy, with specificity values of 0.95-0.99 and precision values between 0.61 and 0.86. In order to provide guidance on the data analysis pipeline, the accuracy diagnostic of three software was investigated: (i) the highest sensitivity was obtained with Spectronaut (median of 0.67) highlighting the ability of Spectronaut to quantify low-abundance proteins, (ii) the best precision value was obtained by MaxDIA (median of 0.84), but with a reduced number of identifications compared to Spectronaut and DIA-NN data, and (iii) the specificity values were similar (between 0.93 and 0.99). The data are available on ProteomeXchange with the identifier PXD044349.

Protein Contaminants Matter: Building Universal Protein Contaminant Libraries for DDA and DIA Proteomics.

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics is constantly challenged by the presence of contaminant background signals. In particular, protein contaminants from reagents and sample handling are almost impossible to avoid. For data-dependent acquisition (DDA) proteomics, an exclusion list can be used to reduce the influence of protein contaminants. However, protein contamination has not been evaluated and is rarely addressed in data-independent acquisition (DIA). How protein contaminants influence proteomic data is also unclear. In this study, we established new protein contaminant FASTA and spectral libraries that are applicable to all proteomic workflows and evaluated the impact of protein contaminants on both DDA and DIA proteomics. We demonstrated that including our contaminant libraries can reduce false discoveries and increase protein identifications, without influencing the quantification accuracy in various proteomic software platforms. With the pressing need to standardize proteomic workflow in the research community, we highly recommend including our contaminant FASTA and spectral libraries in all bottom-up proteomic data analysis. Our contaminant libraries and a step-by-step tutorial to incorporate these libraries in various DDA and DIA data analysis platforms can be valuable resources for proteomic researchers, freely accessible at https://github.com/HaoGroup-ProtContLib.