RESUMEN
AIM: To compare changes in the complement system in C3-glomerulopathy (C3-GP) and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) after the relief of an acute episode of thrombotic microangiopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 8 patients diagnosed with C3-GP and 8 with aHUS in remission. The blood levels of the complement system components were determined: C3, C4, C3a, C5a, factor H (CFH), factor B (CFB), membrane-attacking complex (MAC), antibodies to C3b (anti-C3b-AT), the level of hemolytic activity (CH50), the content of factor D (CFD) in the urine. RESULTS: C3 and CH50 levels were within the reference range in both groups, however, in the C3-GP group they were at the lower limit, and C3 level was significantly lower than in the aHUS group: 0.56 [0.44; 0.96] vs 1.37 [1.16; 2.52] (p=0.003). CFB increased level was detected in both groups, but in the C3-GP group it was significantly lower than in the aHUS group - 275.1 [222.1; 356.6] vs 438.7 [323.3; 449.3] (p=0.010). C3a, C5a and MAC levels were increased in both groups, but the maximum was in the C3-GP group, and the MAC level in the C3-GP group was 2 times higher than that in aHUS, and these differences reached statistical significance - 123 555±6686 vs 5603±1294 (p=0.036). CFH and CFD levels was increased in both groups, but their highest values was in the aHUS group. CONCLUSION: Alternative complement pathway activation signs were present in both groups of patients with complement-mediated nephropathies, regardless the stage of the disease. In C3-GP, alternative complement pathway activation was more pronounced than in aHUS after the relief of an acute episode of thrombotic microangiopathy.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico , Enfermedades Renales , Microangiopatías Trombóticas , Humanos , Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico/diagnóstico , Microangiopatías Trombóticas/diagnóstico , Microangiopatías Trombóticas/etiología , Factores InmunológicosRESUMEN
In April 2012, a group of nephrologists organized a consensus conference in Cambridge (UK) on type II membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and decided to use a new terminology, "C3 glomerulopathy" (C3 GP). Further knowledge on the complement system and on kidney biopsy contributed toward distinguishing this disease into three subgroups: dense deposit disease (DDD), C3 glomerulonephritis (C3 GN), and the CFHR5 nephropathy. The persistent presence of microhematuria with or without light or heavy proteinuria after an infection episode suggests the potential onset of C3 GP. These nephritides are characterized by abnormal activation of the complement alternative pathway, abnormal deposition of C3 in the glomeruli, and progression of renal damage to end-stage kidney disease. The diagnosis is based on studying the complement system, relative genetics, and kidney biopsies. The treatment gap derives from the absence of a robust understanding of their natural outcome. Therefore, a specific treatment for the different types of C3 GP has not been established. Recommendations have been obtained from case series and observational studies because no randomized clinical trials have been conducted. Current treatment is based on corticosteroids and antiproliferative drugs (cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil), monoclonal antibodies (rituximab) or complement inhibitors (eculizumab). In some cases, it is suggested to include sessions of plasma exchange.