Arterial-Portal Venous Shunt after Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Risk factors and Impact on Patient Survival.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been well established. The differential impacts of drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) as opposed to conventional TACE (cTACE) on vascular changes, such as arterial-portal venous shunts (APSs), have been recognized. However, their subsequent effects on treatment outcomes have not been fully explored. This study aims to identify risk factors associated with the occurrence of APS in HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE and to evaluate its impact on patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2012 to December 2018 including 74 HCC patients receiving DEB-TACE as initial treatment and a 1:1 cTACE. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression identified significant risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE. RESULTS: APS incidence was significantly higher after DEB-TACE than cTACE (46.0% vs. 16.2%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in median OS between APS and non-APS groups after DEB-TACE: 50 months (24.6-75.4) versus 26.9 months (19.5-43.2), p = 0.111; median PFS was 15.6 months (4.1-27.1) and 9.5 months (6.8-12.1) for the two groups, respectively, p = 0.065. Risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE were more than two feeding arteries (OR: 7.25, 95% CI: 1.82-28.95, p = 0.005) and non-selective embolization (OR: 8.02, 95% CI: 2.30-27.95, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: APS occurrence was higher in DEB-TACE-treated HCC patients, but it did not significantly affect OS and PFS. More than two feeding arteries and non-selective embolization were significant risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE.

Is DEB-TACE as locoregional therapy before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma effective?

BACKGROUND: The objectives were to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as locoregional therapy (LRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplantation (LT) beyond Hangzhou criteria (HC) and to analyze the prognostic factors. METHODS: Forty patients with HCC beyond HC who received DEB-TACE only before LT were retrospectively analyzed between January 2017 and December 2022. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment response, and adverse events (AE) were collected. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with RFS and OS. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent LT following DEB-TACE with a mean interval of 2.3 months. The objective response rates (ORRs) for these patients following DEB-TACE was 82.5%. The primary AE was post-embolization syndrome (PES), with affected patients experiencing grades I and II. The median RFS and OS were 12.0 months (95%CI: 0.0-30.1) and 52.0 months (95%CI: 11.8-92.2) over the follow-up period until December 2022. The 2-year RFS and OS rates were 42.5%, and 67.5%. Multivariate analyses revealed Child-Pugh classification (HR = 6.24; 95%CI,1.83-21.24; P = 0.01) and macrovascular invasion (MAV) (HR = 3.89; 95%CI,1.07-14.15; P = 0.04) were both significant independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: DEB-TACE can serve as a safe and effective LRT in HCC patients beyond HC before LT, and can improve the prognosis of patients, especially without MAV. The higher Child-Pugh classification and MAV are independent prognostic factors after LT.

Liver abscess after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for hepatic malignant tumors: Clinical features, pathogenesis, and management.

AIM: The study aimed to investigate the clinical features, incidence, pathogenesis, and management of liver abscess after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for primary and metastatic hepatic malignant tumors. METHODS: From June 2019 to June 2021, patients with liver abscess after DEB-TACE for primary and metastatic hepatic malignant tumors were reviewed and evaluated at our hospital. Demographic and clinical data, radiological findings, management approaches, and prognosis were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 419 DEB-TACE procedures were carried out in 314 patients with primary and metastatic liver tumors at our medical center. Twelve patients were confirmed to have liver abscesses after DEB-TACE through clinical manifestations, laboratory investigations, and imaging. In this study, the incidence of liver abscess was 3.82% per patient and 2.86% per DEB-TACE procedure. After percutaneous drainage and anti-inflammatory treatments, 10 patients recovered, and the remaining 2 patients died due to direct complications of liver abscess, such as sepsis and multiple organ failure. The mortality rate of liver abscesses after DEB-TACE was 16.7% (2/12). CONCLUSION: The incidence of liver abscess after DEB-TACE is relatively high and can have serious consequences, including death. Potential risk factors could include large tumor size, history of bile duct or tumor resection, history of diabetes, small DEB size (100-300 µm). Sensitive antibiotics therapy and percutaneous abscess aspiration/drainage are effective treatments for liver abscess after DEB-TACE.

Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads combined with systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy is the standard treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CRCLM). Transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) is considered an effective treatment option for CRCLM. Few studies have investigated the combination of DEB-TACE, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy for CRCLM. In the present study, we evaluated the disease control rate (DCR), adverse events, and survival among patients with CRCLM who underwent the combination of DEB-TACE and chemotherapy/targeted therapy. MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed 35 patients with CRCLM who were treated between January 2015 and January 2021. Standard systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and 66 DEB-TACE procedures were administered. Data were collected on each DEB-TACE procedure, including chemotherapy agents, tumor burden of liver metastasis, number of DEB-TACE courses, and adverse events. Patients who received DEB-TACE after failure of first-line systemic therapy were categorized into the first-line failure group. Patients who received DEB-TACE after the failure of second-line, third-line, or fourth-line therapy were categorized into the other group. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 35 patients with CRCLM (34 patients with adenocarcinoma and 1 patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma) were enrolled. In total, 13 patients (37.1%) had extrahepatic metastases at initial diagnosis. In this study, 66 DEB-TACE procedures were performed. The DCR was 54.3%. The median OS period was 47.4 months, and the estimated 3-year OS rate was 59.5%. The median PFS period was 6.3 months, and the estimated 1-year PFS rate was 20.6%. The PFS period was longer in the first-line failure group than in the other group (7.2 vs. 6.3 months). No significant difference was observed in OS between the two groups. Four episodes (6.1%) of grade 3 intra-abdominal infection were observed. CONCLUSION: The combination of chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and DEB-TACE can lead to a favorable DCR and survival outcomes in patients with CRCLM. Early intervention with DEB-TACE (i.e., after the failure of first-line therapy) has the potential to extend the PFS period in patients with CRCLM. Severe adverse events were rare and manageable. Further prospective, randomized controlled studies are warranted to obtain more conclusive findings.

Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Radiofrequency Ablation as an Initial Treatment of Single Small (≤ 3 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term therapeutic outcomes of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the initial treatment of a single small (≤ 3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2021, 259 consecutive patients who underwent DEB-TACE (67 patients) or RFA (192 patients) as a first-line treatment for a single small HCC were enrolled in this retrospective study. The therapeutic outcomes, including cumulative intrahepatic local tumor progression (LTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and long-term overall survival (OS) rates, were compared between the two groups before and after propensity score (PS) matching. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the prognostic factors and differences in OS and PFS between the two groups for all 92 patients after PS matching. RESULTS: After PS matching, the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year LTP rates were lower in the RFA group than those in the DEB-TACE group (P < 0.001), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates in the RFA group were higher than those in the DEB-TACE group (P = 0.007). However, the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were not significantly different between the RFA and DEB-TACE groups (P = 0.584). Moreover, the OS was not significantly different between the RFA and DEB-TACE groups in the univariate and multivariate analyses, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.81. The PFS was significantly higher in the RFA group than that in the DEB-TACE group in the univariate analyses, with a HR of 0.44 (P = 0.009). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that albumin (P = 0.019) was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Additionally, the major complication rates were not significantly different between the DEB-TACE and RFA groups (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: The LTP and PFS rates of RFA were superior to those of DEB-TACE in the initial treatment of single small HCC after PS matching. However, the OS rates were not significantly different between RFA and DEB-TACE. Therefore, DEB-TACE may be considered an efficient substitute for RFA in some patients with a single small HCC who are ineligible for RFA.

Pirarubicin-loaded CalliSpheres® drug-eluting beads for the treatment of patients with stage III-IV lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: CalliSpheres® beads (CB) have been used recently for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the safety and effect of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in patients with stage III-IV lung cancer are still unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of DEB-TACE with pirarubicin-loaded CB for the treatment of stage III-IV lung cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From July 2016 to April 2020, 29 patients with stage III-IV primary lung cancer underwent DEB-TACE with pirarubicin-loaded CB. The objective response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint; the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients received DEB-TACE with pirarubicin-loaded (median 60 mg) CB, with no severe adverse events or treatment-related deaths. After DEB-TACE, hemoptysis disappeared within 1-3 days in all patients, and the symptoms of cough or expectoration were significantly improved in 12 patients. ORR and disease control rate at one, three, and six months after DEB-TACE were 39.3% and 96.4%, 26.1% and 69.6%, and 29.4% and 58.8%, respectively. The median PFS was 6.3 months (range 1.1-30.1 months), and the three-, six-, and 12-month PFS rates were 70.2%, 50.1%, and 27.1%, respectively. The median OS was 10.2 months (range 1.1-44.6 months), and the three-, six, and 12-month OS rates were 87.9%, 68.6%, and 39.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE with pirarubicin-loaded CB is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated for patients with stage III-IV lung cancer, and symptom control was a potential benefit of treatment.

Five-year outcome of conventional and drug-eluting transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Currently, no standard of care or therapies have been established for patients with advanced HCC. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization using gelatin sponges or microspheres plus lipiodol-doxorubicin (cTACE) and TACE with doxorubicin-loaded drug eluting beads (DEB-TACE). METHODS: This retrospective study included 273 patients who received cTACE (n = 201) or DEB-TACE. Tumor response, survival, and adverse events were evaluated over a 5-year follow-up period. RESULTS: During 5-year follow-up, a greater percentage of patients treated with cTACE died than those treated with DEB-TACE (76.1% vs. 66.7%) (P = 0.045). At the last evaluation, all surviving patients had disease progression and no differences were seen between treatment groups. However, the time to disease progression differed between groups; median time to disease progression was 11.0 months for cTACE and 16.0 months for DEB-TACE (P = 0.019). The median survival time was 37 months in both treatment groups. No significant differences were observed between cTACE and DEB-TACE therapies in subgroups of patients with BCLC stage A or stage B + C either in survival time or time to disease progression (P values > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in survival status or disease progression between cTACE and DEB-TACE in patient subgroups with either tumor number > 5 or with the sum of the diameter of largest five HCC tumors being > 7 cm. CONCLUSIONS: DEB-TACE demonstrates greater long-term benefits than cTACE in treating treatment-naïve patients with HCC. Results of this long-term study support the use of DEB-TACE in treating HCC.

Hemobilia immediately after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads for hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic bile duct invasion.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is used as a palliative treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Recently, a novel drug delivery-embolic agent, the drug-eluting bead (DEB), was introduced for TACE. There are a few reports of tumor hemorrhage after TACE using DEB (DEB-TACE) for HCC. However, there have not been any reports of hemobilia immediately after DEB-TACE for HCC with intrahepatic bile duct invasion. Here, the first such case is reported. A 71-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital to undergo DEB-TACE for multiple HCCs with worsening left intrahepatic bile duct dilatation. She was diagnosed with HCC that extensively invaded the left hepatic duct. After DEB-TACE through the left hepatic artery, a hepatic arteriogram showed extra flow of the contrast agent to the left hepatic and common bile ducts. Therefore, transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) of the responsible vessel was carried out using coils, and no extra flow of the contrast agent was identified. The patient was discharged 14 days after TAE without deterioration of liver function. Although hemobilia immediately after DEB-TACE is rare, there may be increased potential for hemobilia when DEB-TACE is carried out for HCC with extensive bile duct invasion. We suggest that DEB-TACE may be contraindicated for such cases.

Bench-to-clinic development of imageable drug-eluting embolization beads: finding the balance.

This review describes the historical development of an imageable spherical embolic agent and focuses on work performed in collaboration between Biocompatibles UK Ltd (a BTG International group company) and the NIH to demonstrate radiopaque bead utility and bring a commercial offering to market that meets a clinical need. Various chemistries have been investigated and multiple prototypes evaluated in search of an optimized product with the right balance of handling and imaging properties. Herein, we describe the steps taken in the development of DC Bead LUMI™, the first commercially available radiopaque drug-eluting bead, ultimately leading to the first human experience of this novel embolic agent in the treatment of liver tumors.

Meta-analysis: adjusted indirect comparison of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization versus 90Y-radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate comparative effectiveness of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus Yttrium-90 (90Y)-radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Studies comparing conventional (c)TACE versus 90Y-radioembolization or DEB-TACE for HCC treatment were identified using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The adjusted indirect meta-analytic method for effectiveness comparison of DEB-TACE versus 90Y-radioembolization was used. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare baseline characteristics. A priori defined sensitivity analysis of stratified study subgroups was performed for primary outcome analyses. Publication bias was tested by Egger's and Begg's tests. RESULTS: Fourteen studies comparing DEB-TACE or 90Y-radioembolization with cTACE were included. Analysis revealed a 1-year overall survival benefit for DEB-TACE over 90Y-radioembolization (79 % vs. 54.8 %; OR: 0.57; 95 %CI: 0.355-0.915; p = 0.02; I-squared: 0 %; p > 0.5), but not for the 2-year (61 % vs. 34 %; OR: 0.65; 95%CI: 0.294-1.437; p = 0.29) and 3-year survival (56.4 % vs. 20.9 %; OR: 0.713; 95 % CI: 0.21-2.548; p = 0.62). There was significant heterogeneity in the 2- and 3-year survival analyses. The pooled median overall survival was longer for DEB-TACE (22.6 vs. 14.7 months). There was no significant difference in tumour response rate. CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE and 90Y-radioembolization are efficacious treatments for patients suffering from HCC; DEB-TACE demonstrated survival benefit at 1-year compared to 90Y-radioembolization but direct comparison is warranted for further evaluation. KEY POINTS: • This meta-analysis shows greater 1-year survival benefit for DEB-TACE over 90 Y-radioembolization. • DEB-TACE has a favourable 2- & 3-year survival benefit trend over 90 Y-radioembolization. • No significant difference for tumour response was detected. • Direct comparison of these methods for a more robust evaluation is warranted.

Hepatic arterial damage after transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of drug-eluting bead and conventional chemoembolization in a retrospective controlled study.

Background Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) frequently causes feeding artery stenosis or occlusion that may interfere with repeated treatment. Purpose To investigate the incidence and predictors of hepatic arterial damage (HAD) after drug-eluting bead-TACE (DEB-TACE) in comparison with conventional TACE (Conv-TACE). Material and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 54 patients who underwent DEB-TACE for HCC as an initial treatment with follow-up angiography and 54 patients who underwent Conv-TACE using doxorubicin-lipiodol mixture and gelfoam particles for comparison. HAD was evaluated after a single session of TACE and graded as follows: grade I, no significant wall irregularity; grade II, overt stenosis; grade III, occlusion. Results The incidence of HAD was significantly higher in the DEB-TACE group than the Conv-TACE group when analyzed per branch (odds ratio [OR], 6.36; P < 0.001) and per patient (OR, 3.15; P = 0.005). For each HAD grade, the mean doxorubicin dose was greater in the DEB-TACE group than in the Conv-TACE group ( P < 0.001, P = 0.053, and P = 0.01 for grades I, II, and III, respectively). In multivariate analysis, risk factors of HAD included mean doxorubicin dose and selective embolization in the Conv-TACE group ( P = 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively) and mean doxorubicin dose in the DEB-TACE group ( P = 0.004). Conclusion The incidence and grade of HAD were higher after DEB-TACE compared to Conv-TACE with doxorubicin dose as a possible risk factor. HAD was independent of overall survival in both groups.

Survival of patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma treated with superselective transarterial chemoembolization using doxorubicin-loaded DC Bead under cone-beam computed tomography control.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate treatment response, adverse events and survival rates of patients with intermediate stage HCC treated with superselective doxorubicin-loaded DC Bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEBDOX) under cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2010 and June 2012, 35 consecutive patients with intermediate stage HCC (32 male, 3 female; average age, 67.5 ± 7.8 years; 22 patients Child-Pugh class A, 8 class B, 5 without cirrhosis) were treated with DEBDOX TACE. Portal vein thrombosis was observed in 6 (17.1%) patients. DEBDOX TACE was performed by superselective catheterization of feeding vessels followed by embolization with 100-300 µm microspheres loaded with 50-100 mg of doxorubicin. In all cases, CBCT was used during chemoembolization. Tumor response rates were defined according to mRECIST criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 120 procedures were performed (mean, 3.2 per patients). We treated 97 lesions with an average diameter of 4.9 ± 1.9 cm. There were 32 minor and 2 (1.6%) major complications (one liver abscess and one cerebrovascular insult). After a mean follow-up of 27.7 ± 10.5 months, 94.3% of patients achieved an objective response to treatment (42.4% complete response and 57.6% partial response). Mean time to progression was 10.9 ± 5.3 months. Mean overall survival was 33.9 months (95% CI; 28.9 - 38.9 months), with 1- and 2- year survival of 97.1% and 65.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Superselective DEBDOX TACE performed under CBCT control is a safe and effective method with high rates of tumor response and overall survival.

A review of conventional and drug-eluting chemoembolization in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases: principles and proof.

The management of colorectal liver metastasis has undergone a significant change since the development of novel ablation and embolization. Drug-eluting microsphere platforms, designed to deliver targeted concentrations of systemic therapy directly into the tumor via its arterial vasculature, have garnered interest and gained in popularity in recent years. Based on in vitro and in vivo data, multiple factors contribute to locoregional exposure including carrier base, smaller particle size (larger surface area), chemotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic intensity. Based on the current published clinical data, therapy appears well tolerated but the questions remain as to the ideal technique, patient population and overall efficacy. The purpose of this article is to provide a perspective on the scientific basis, and clinical review of the current data supporting the use of this platform in the setting of metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Comparison of Chemoembolization Outcomes Using 70-150 µm and 100-300 µm Drug-Eluting Beads in Treating Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) according to the size of the beads for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 212 patients with a single HCC ≤5 cm from five tertiary institutions. One hundred and nine patients were treated with 70-150-µm doxorubicin DEBs (group A), and 103 patients received 100-300-µm doxorubicin DEBs (group B). The initial tumor response (assessed between 3 weeks and 2 months after DEB-TACE), time to local tumor progression (TTLTP), restricted mean duration of complete response (RMDCR), rate of complications, incidence of post-embolization syndrome, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze prognostic factors for initial tumor response. RESULTS: The initial objective response rates were 91.7% (100/109) and 84.5% (87/103) for groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.101). In the subgroup analysis of tumors ≤3 cm, the initial objective response rates were 94.6% (53/56) and 78.0% (39/50) for groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.012). There was no significant difference in the TTLTP (median, 23.7 months for group A vs. 19.0 months for group B; P = 0.278 [log-rank], 0.190 [multivariable Cox regression]) or RMDCR at 24 months (11.4 months vs. 8.5 months, respectively; P = 0.088). In the subgroup analysis of tumors >3-cm, the RMDCR at 24 months was significantly longer in group A than in group B (11.8 months vs. 5.7 months, P = 0.024). The incidence of mild bile duct dilatation after DEB-TACE was significantly higher in group B than in group A (5.5% [6/109] vs. 18.4% [19/103], P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE using 70-150-µm microspheres demonstrated a higher initial objective response rate in ≤3-cm HCCs and a longer RMDCR at 24 months in 3.1-5-cm HCCs compared to larger DEBs (100-300-µm).

Pingyangmycin-loaded drug-eluting beads transarterial embolisation for giant cavernous haemangioma of the liver: A case report.

Purpose: Cavernous haemangioma of the liver (CHL) is the most common venous malformation of the liver. Surgical resection is considered the gold standard for large symptomatic haemangiomas. Transarterial embolisation has demonstrated acceptable efficacy with lower rates of morbidity and mortality. We report the first case of a 59-year-old man with a giant CHL treated using pingyangmycin drug-eluting bead transarterial embolisation (DEB-TACE). Material and methods: A 59-year-old man presented to our hospital with cough and sputum, most probably related to the mass effect of the haemangioma and secondary lung collapse. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a 187.5 mm × 142.7 mm cavernous haemangioma located in the right lobe of the liver. He underwent DEB-TACE, and a 2.6-F microcatheter was used to selectively catheterise the right hepatic artery. One vial of 300-500-µm CalliSpheres microspheres loaded with 8-mg pingyangmycin and two vials of 100-300-µm microspheres were injected through the microcatheter until the disappearance of CHL staining. Results: The patient experienced mild abdominal pain on the second day after embolisation. A reduction in CHL size to 106.7 × 141.3 mm was observed on the 1.1-month follow-up CT. We performed a second similar DEB-TACE, which resulted in further size reduction to 83.1 × 50.1 mm, as detected on the follow-up CT at 4.6 months. At the 8.7-month follow-up, his clinical symptoms improved with no cough or sputum and the CHL size further reduced to 63.2 × 55.8 mm. Conclusion: We report the first case of a giant CHL treated using DEB-TACE. Although DEB-TACE may be an effective and safe alternative for treating of giant CHL, an in vitro study on the efficient loading and binding of pingyangmycin with microspheres and more comparative studies with larger samples are required to further confirm its safety and efficacy.

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization as neoadjuvant therapy pre-liver transplantation for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as neoadjuvant therapy before liver transplantation (LT) for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to analyze the prognostic factors. AIM: To determine whether DEB-TACE before LT is superior to LT for advanced-stage HCC. METHODS: A total of 99 individuals diagnosed with advanced HCC were studied retrospectively. The participants were categorized into the following two groups based on whether they had received DEB-TACE before LT: DEB-TACE group (n = 45) and control group (n = 54). The participants were further divided into two subgroups based on the presence or absence of segmental portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). The DEB-TACE group consisted of two subgroups: Group A (n = 31) without PVTT and group B (n = 14) with PVTT. The control group also had two subgroups: Group C (n = 37) without PVTT and group D (n = 17) with PVTT. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, therapy response, and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the parameters that were independently related to OS and RFS. RESULTS: The DEB-TACE group exhibited an overall response rate of 86.6%. Following therapy, there was a significant decrease in the median alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (275.1 ng/mL vs 41.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001). The main AE was post-embolization syndrome. The 2-year rates of RFS and OS were significantly higher in the DEB-TACE group than in the control group (68.9% vs 38.9%, P = 0.003; 86.7% vs 63.0%, P = 0.008). Within the subgroups, group A had higher 2-year rates of RFS and OS compared to group C (71.0% vs 45.9%, P = 0.038; 83.8% vs 62.2%, P = 0.047). The 2-year RFS rate of group B was markedly superior to that of group D (64.3% vs 23.5%, P = 0.002). Results from multivariate analyses showed that pre-LT DEB-TACE [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44-5.14, P = 0.04], overall target tumor diameter ≤ 7 cm (HR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.05-3.75, P = 0.035), and AFP level ≤ 400 ng/mL (HR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.30-4.19, P = 0.009) were significant risk factors for RFS. Additionally, pre-LT DEB-TACE (HR = 3.15, 95%CI: 1.43-6.96, P = 0.004) was identified as a significant risk factor for OS. CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE is a safe and efficient therapy for advanced-stage HCC and also enhances patient survival after LT.

Barriers to drug delivery in interventional oncology.

Although much attention has been paid to mechanisms of anticancer drug resistance that focus on intracellular processes that protect tumor cells, it has recently become increasingly evident that the unique features of the tumor microenvironment profoundly impact the efficacy of cancer therapies. The properties of this extracellular milieu, including increased interstitial pressure, decreased pH, hypoxia, and abnormal vascularity, result in limited drug efficacy; this finding is true not only for systemic chemotherapy but also for catheter-based therapies, including chemoembolization and radioembolization. The present review summarizes the barriers to drug delivery imposed by the tumor microenvironment and provides methods to overcome these hurdles.

Programmed cell death in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with yttrium-90 and doxorubicin-loaded beads.

Molecular analysis of apoptosis and autophagy pathways was performed from a single hepatocellular carcinoma treated with yttrium-90 and doxorubicin-loaded beads before resection and compared with normal liver tissue from the margins. Both bead formulations activated apoptosis-associated mechanisms and increased autophagy pathway protein levels. Increased DNA fragmentation and autophagy markers were seen in tumor treated with drug-eluting beads compared with yttrium-90-treated tumor. These results suggest that both microembolic therapies activate cell death signaling, although differences in apoptosis and autophagy pathways were seen in this patient. Knowledge of mechanisms of action for each treatment may enhance future therapeutic strategies.

Transarterial chemoembolization with irinotecan beads in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases: systematic review.

PURPOSE: For patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), transarterial embolization with the use of drug-eluting beads with irinotecan (DEBIRI) represents a novel alternative to systemic chemotherapy or local treatments alone. The present systematic review evaluates available data on the efficacy and safety of DEBIRI embolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of medical literature identified studies describing the use of DEBIRI in the treatment of CRLM. Data describing adverse events, pharmacokinetics, tumor response, and overall survival were collected. RESULTS: Five observational studies and one randomized controlled trial (RCT) were reviewed. A total of 235 patients were included in the descriptive analysis of observational studies. Postembolization syndrome was the most common adverse event. Peak plasma levels of irinotecan were observed at 1-2 hours after administration. Wide variations in tumor response were observed. The median survival time ranged from 15.2 months to 25 months. In the RCT, treatment with DEBIRI was superior to systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan in terms of quality of life and progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with unresectable CRLM, particularly after failure to respond to first-line regimens, DEBIRI represents a novel alternative to systemic chemotherapy alone, transarterial embolization with other agents, or other local treatments (eg, microwave or radiofrequency ablation). In these reports, DEBIRI was safe and effective in the in the treatment of unresectable CRLM. Further RCTs comparing DEBIRI with alternative management strategies are required to define the optimal role for this treatment.

Cancer concepts and principles: primer for the interventional oncologist-part II.

This is the second of a two-part overview of the fundamentals of oncology for interventional radiologists. The first part focused on clinical trials, basic statistics, assessment of response, and overall concepts in oncology. This second part aims to review the methods of tumor characterization; principles of the oncology specialties, including medical, surgical, radiation, and interventional oncology; and current treatment paradigms for the most common cancers encountered in interventional oncology, along with the levels of evidence that guide these treatments.