Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Surgeon ; 22(1): 37-42, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652801

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a method for temporary hemorrhage control used in haemodynamically unwell patients with severe bleeding. In haemodynamically unwell abdominal trauma patients, laparotomy remains the initial procedure of choice. Using REBOA in patients as a bridge to laparotomy is a novel option whose feasibility and efficacy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the clinical outcome in patients with abdominal injury who underwent both REBOA placement and laparotomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective study, including trauma patients with an isolated abdominal injury who underwent both REBOA placement and laparotomy, during the period 2011-2019. All data were collected via the Aortic Balloon Occlusion Trauma Registry database. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were included in this study. The main mechanism of trauma was blunt injury (62.1%) and the median injury severity score (ISS) was 33 (14-74). Renal failure and multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) occurred in 15.5% and 35% of patients, respectively. Overall, 30-day mortality was 50.5%. Post balloon inflation systolic blood pressure (SBP) >80 mmHg was associated with lower 24-h mortality (p = 0.007). No differences in mortality were found among patients who underwent partial occlusion vs. total occlusion of the aorta. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the feasibility of REBOA use in patients with isolated abdominal injury, with survival rates similar to previous reports for haemodynamically unstable abdominal trauma patients. Post-balloon inflation SBP >80 mmHg was associated with a significant reduction in 24-h mortality rates, but not 30-day mortality. Total aortic occlusion was not associated with increased mortality, MODS, and complication rates compared with partial occlusion.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Oclusión con Balón , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Choque Hemorrágico , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aorta/cirugía , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Resucitación/efectos adversos , Resucitación/métodos , Oclusión con Balón/efectos adversos , Oclusión con Balón/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Choque Hemorrágico/complicaciones , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia
2.
Updates Surg ; 72(2): 527-536, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32130669

RESUMEN

EndoVascular and Hybrid Trauma Management (EVTM) has been recently introduced in the treatment of severe pelvic ring injuries. This multimodal method of hemorrhage management counts on several strategies such as the REBOA (resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta). Few data exist on the use of REBOA in patients with a severely injured pelvic ring. The ABO (aortic balloon occlusion) Trauma Registry is designed to capture data for all trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock where management includes REBOA placement. Among all patients included in the ABO registry, 72 patients presented with severe pelvic injuries and were the population under exam. 66.7% were male. Mean and median ISS were respectively 43 and 41 (SD ± 13). Isolated pelvic injuries were observed in 12 patients (16.7%). Blunt trauma occurred in 68 patients (94.4%), penetrating in 2 (2.8%) and combined in 2 (2.8%). Type of injury: fall from height in 15 patients (23.1%), traffic accident in 49 patients (75.4%), and unspecified impact in 1 patient (1.5%). Femoral access was gained pre-hospital in 1 patient, in emergency room in 43, in operating room in 12 and in angio-suite in 16. REBOA was positioned in zone 1 in 59 patients (81,9%), in zone 2 in 1 (1,4%) and in zone 3 in 12 (16,7%). Aortic occlusion was partial/periodical in 35 patients (48,6%) and total occlusion in 37 patients (51,4%). REBOA associated morbidity rate: 11.1%. Overall mortality rate was 54.2% and early mortality rate (≤ 24 h) was 44.4%. In the univariate analysis, factors related to early mortality (≤ 24 h) are lower pH values (p = 0.03), higher base deficit (p = 0.021), longer INR (p = 0.012), minor increase in systolic blood pressure after the REBOA inflation (p = 0.03) and total aortic occlusion (p = 0.008). None of these values resulted significant in the multivariate analysis. In severe hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma management, REBOA is a viable option when utilized in experienced centers as a bridge to other treatments; its use might be, however, accompanied with severe-to-lethal complications.


Asunto(s)
Aorta , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/terapia , Oclusión con Balón/métodos , Pelvis/lesiones , Sistema de Registros , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/etiología , Oclusión con Balón/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Choque Hemorrágico/etiología , Choque Hemorrágico/mortalidad , Sístole , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda