Endoscopic Insertion of Nasojejunal Feeding Tube at Bedside for Critically Ill Patients: Relationship between Tube Position and Intragastric Countercurrent of Contrast Medium.

Background and Oblectives: We evaluated the success rate of endoscopically positioned nasojejunal feeding tubes and the intragastric countercurrent of contrast medium thereafter. METHOD: This retrospective observational study investigated patients who were admitted to a single intensive care unit and required endoscopic placement of a post-pyloric feeding tube between January 2010 and June 2016. The feeding tube was grasped with forceps via a transoral endoscope and inserted into the duodenum or jejunum. Thereafter, we assessed the position of the tube and the intragastric countercurrent using abdominal radiography with contrast medium. RESULTS: The tube tip was inserted at the jejunum and the duodenal fourth portion in 55.8 and 33.6% of patients, respectively. The tip of the inserted tube had moved into the jejunum of 71.7% of patients by the following day. The countercurrent rate was significantly lower among patients with a tube inserted into the duodenal fourth portion or more distal than among those with tubes inserted more proximally (8.4 vs. 45.4%, p = 0.0022). CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic insertion and positioning of a nasojejunal feeding tube seemed effective because the rate of tube insertion into the duodenal fourth portion or more distal was about 90%. The findings of intragastric countercurrents indicated that feeding tubes should be inserted into the duodenal fourth portion or beyond to prevent vomiting and the aspiration of enteral nutrients.

A Novel Vesicoscopic Bladder Wall Suture Fixation Technique to Aid Endoscopic Vesicostomy Button Insertion.

BACKGROUND: To describe a novel bladder fixation technique for use during endoscopic vesicostomy button insertion. METHODS: After standard cystoscopic visualization of the bladder, a standard 18 G intravenous cannula was inserted into the bladder. A non-absorbable suture thread was placed through this intravenous cannula under cystoscopic vision. The proximal end of the suture was then removed using standard ureteroscopic grasping forceps (3 Fr) through another needle (15 G) inserted next to the initial puncture site (following a path at 30 degrees from the initial puncture tract) into the bladder. The suture ends were brought out of the bladder and tied at the skin level, 2 cm from the intended vesicostomy site. Sutures were removed on the second postoperative day. RESULTS: This fixation technique allows for adequate fixation of the bladder dome to the anterior abdominal wall. These sutures also have less potential for cutaneous scarring and pain. No complications were reported. CONCLUSION: This simple fixation technique is easily performed using materials found in every urology suite. It also avoids the skills required with other previously reported fixation suture techniques, and can also be utilized for bladder fixation in cases of vesicoscopic laparoscopic or robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures.