EpiTrack is a feasible tool for assessing attention and executive functions in patients with refractory epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this cross-sectional retrospective study was to utilize EpiTrack to assess cognitive performance within the domain of attention and executive functions in patients with refractory epilepsy in consideration for treatment interventions either with antiepileptic drug (AED) changes and/or neuromodulation therapies. We also aimed to identify the relevant clinical and treatment factors possibly affecting EpiTrack performance. METHODS: The patient group consisted of 95 consecutive refractory epilepsy patients who were evaluated with EpiTrack. Based on their EpiTrack performance, the patients could be categorized as cognitively unimpaired, mildly, or severely impaired. The patients were also divided into three groups based on the planned treatment modification: AED group (n = 38) with only AED treatment, vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) group (n = 40) and deep-brain stimulation (DBS) group (n = 17). However, the effect of planned interventions was not the subject of this study. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records for detailed clinical characterization. RESULTS: EpiTrack performance was severely impaired in 48 (50.5%), mildly impaired in 22 (23.2%) and unimpaired in 25 (26.3%) of the patients. The DBS group had significantly lower EpiTrack scores (mean (SD) and median, 25.5 (4.81) and 27.0, respectively) compared to the AED group (28.6 (6.2) and 30.0, respectively, p = 0.049). Sixty-three (66.3%) of the whole study population had more than 2 AEDs. When comparing EpiTrack scores between patient groups based on the number of AEDs administered, there was a trend toward better performance in EpiTrack with 2 AEDs as compared to 3-4 AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in attention and executive functions were frequent among patients with refractory epilepsy. Deficits were evident in all three treatment groups being most severe in the DBS group reflecting the patient selection. Furthermore, the effect of AED burden on executive functions was remarkable since two thirds of the patients had more than two AEDs and the deficits were more prominent among those with a higher AED burden. These results highlight the benefits of a feasible screening tool such as EpiTrack for assessing attention and executive functions when optimizing the treatment effects of neurostimulation therapies on cognition, and when evaluating the impacts of the AED burden.

Effects on executive functions of antiepileptic monotherapy in pediatric age.

OBJECTIVES: Cognitive abilities and executive functions in children and adolescents are important indicators of quality of life as well as academic and social achievements. Cognitive and executive functioning are often impaired in patients with epilepsy and can be exacerbated by seizures and antiseizure drugs. The aim of our observational retrospective study was to assess executive functioning in patients with pediatric epilepsy, currently taking a single antiseizure medication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 172 children and adolescents aged between 6 and 18 years (mean age = 12 ±â€¯3.4 years) with newly diagnosed epilepsy who had not yet commenced an antiepileptic treatment were included in the study. Longitudinal changes in executive functioning were assessed using the EpiTrack Junior test at baseline, before the introduction of antiepileptic monotherapy, and at 3-month, 6-month, and 9-month follow-up visits. All patients commenced a single antiepileptic treatment (levetiracetam n = 54; valproic acid n = 52; ethosuximide n = 20; oxcarbazepine n = 22; carbamazepine n = 24). Age, sex, seizure types, and seizure baseline frequency were also recorded. RESULTS: Relative to baseline, Epitrack Junior mean scores deteriorated at the 9-month follow-up visit for patients taking valproic acid, ethosuximide, and carbamazepine, but this was only statistically significant for patients taking carbamazepine. In contrast, mean scores improved for subjects taking levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine at the 9-month follow-up visit relative to baseline, but this was only statistically significant for patients taking levetiracetam. CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam was the only antiseizure medication that led to slight improvements in executive functioning; whereas carbamazepine led to deteriorations in cognitive functioning. Further research using double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Screening of attention and executive functions in pediatric patients at a tertiary epilepsy center.

OBJECTIVE: Executive dysfunction is prevalent in children with epilepsy, and associated with poor psychosocial outcome. Sensitive and time effective tools are needed, which capture executive dysfunction across a wide range of impairment. The present study evaluates the applicability of EpiTrack Junior® (EpiTrackJr) as a screening tool at a tertiary epilepsy center, and explore how EpiTrackJr in combination with a subjective measure of everyday attention and executive functions (EFs) may provide clinically important information. METHODS: Retrospective study including 235 pediatric patients admitted to the Norwegian National Centre for Epilepsy. EpiTrackJr and Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning (BRIEF) were used to assess attention and EFs. RESULTS: 27,7% obtained a score categorized as "average/unimpaired", 23% as "mildly impaired", and 47.7% as "significantly impaired" on EpiTrackJr. The distribution of age-corrected EpiTrackJr scores was satisfactory. Performance was related to numbers of anti-seizure medication (ASM load), comorbidity and IQ. We found a significant, but weak correlation between EpiTrackJr performance and the BRIEF Metacognitive Index (r = -0.236, n = 108, p=.014), but no significant correlation with the Behavioral Regulation Index (r = -0.178, n = 108, p=.065). SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicate that EpiTrackJr is applicable as a screening tool for attention and EFs in pediatric patients at a tertiary epilepsy center. Impaired test performance was associated with greater ASM load, comorbidity and lower IQ. Performance based measures and behavior ratings likely capture different aspects of EFs. In combination, the two provide important and nonredundant information about the child's EFs in different settings.

Which clinical and neuropsychological factors are responsible for cognitive impairment in patients with epilepsy?

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess the effect of demographic and clinical features of epilepsy, anxiety, depressed mood, sleep, and quality of life on the prediction of cognitive decline in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: Two hundred and six consecutive patients with epilepsy (age 41.8 ± 15.6 years, mean, SD) out of 279, were included in this cross-sectional study. We used simple linear regression to calculate the results. RESULTS: Objective cognitive status was predicted by anxiety and depression mood changes (Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), p = 0.03, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), p = 0.005), language subdomain of Quality of Life Inventory in Epilepsy-89 (QOLIE-89) (p = 0.003), and total QOLIE-89 (p = 0.001). No significance was shown in demographic and clinical features of epilepsy (gender, age at onset, epilepsy duration, type, etiology of epilepsy, and antiepileptic treatment), except frequency of generalized epileptic seizures (p = 0.03), which also served as an independent predictor of anxiety (BAI) and depression (BDI). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings point at the role of mood changes in the cognitive status of patients with epilepsy, which should be used as an essential therapeutic target apart of seizure control.

Lacosamide may improve cognition in patients with focal epilepsy: EpiTrack to compare cognitive side effects of lacosamide and carbamazepine.

Carbamazepine (CBZ) is a first generation anti-seizure drug, considered as first choice therapy in focal epilepsy but associated with cognitive side effects. Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation anti-seizure drug approved for treating focal epilepsy. This case series documented the comparable efficacy of LCM and CBZ as first add on treatments in patients affected by uncontrolled focal seizures. LCM showed an increase in EpiTrack scores, which measure cognitive abilities, at follow-up compared to CBZ. This preliminary data may represent the basis for future prospective studies aimed at comparing the long-term cognitive side effects of LCM and CBZ.