Residential HVAC runtime from smart thermostats: characterization, comparison, and impacts.

In North America, the majority of homes use forced-air systems for heating and cooling. The proportion of time these systems operate, or runtime, has a significant impact on many building performance parameters. The recent adoption of smart thermostats in many North American homes presents a potential data source for runtime. Smart thermostat data collected from over 7000 homes were compared with nine other investigations and a runtime estimation method based on exterior temperature. The smart thermostat runtimes have a median of 18% across all homes, but show considerable variation between homes, even at constant exterior temperature conditions suggesting that factors besides climate (eg, system sizing, user operation) have a significant impact on runtime. Results from other investigations suggest that smart thermostat runtimes are consistent with other measurement approaches. The practical implications of runtime include the impact on central filtration performance. At low to average runtimes, the filter efficiency matters much less for effectiveness because the system does not run enough for a sufficient air volume to pass through the filter and have a substantial impact on particle concentrations. This work illustrates the importance of measuring runtime for a particular home, and the value of data obtained from smart thermostats.

Real-World Effectiveness of Portable Air Cleaners in Reducing Home Particulate Matter Concentrations.

Portable air cleaners (PACs) equipped with HEPA filters are gaining attention as cost-effective means of decreasing indoor particulate matter (PM) air pollutants and airborne viruses. However, the performance of PACs in naturalistic settings and spaces beyond the room containing the PAC is not well characterized. We conducted a single-blinded randomized cross-over interventional study between November 2020 and May 2021 in the homes of adults who tested positive for COVID-19. The intervention was air filtration with PAC operated with the HEPA filter set installed ("filter" condition) versus removed ("sham" condition, i.e., control). Sampling was performed in 29 homes for two consecutive 24-hour periods in the primary room (containing the PAC) and a secondary room. PAC effectiveness, calculated as reductions in overall mean PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations during the filter condition, were for the primary rooms 78.8% and 63.9% (n = 23), respectively, and for the secondary rooms 57.9% and 60.4% (n = 22), respectively. When a central air handler (CAH) was reported to be in use, filter-associated reductions of PM were statistically significant during the day (06:00-22:00) and night (22:01-05:59) in the primary rooms but only during the day in the secondary rooms. Our study adds to the literature evaluating the real-world effects of PACs on a secondary room and considering the impact of central air systems on PAC performance.