A review of 14 cases of perianal Paget's disease: characteristics of anorectal cancer with pagetoid spread.

BACKGROUND: Perianal Paget's disease (PPD) is an intraepithelial invasion of the perianal skin and is frequently associated with underlying anorectal carcinoma. The relatively rare nature of this disease has made it difficult to develop treatment recommendations. This study aims to analyze the clinical and pathological features of perianal Paget's disease (PPD) and to explore rational treatment options and follow-up for this disease. METHODS: The National Cancer Center Hospital database was searched for all cases of perianal Paget's disease diagnosed between 2006 and 2021. In the 14 patients identified, we reviewed the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of adenocarcinoma with pagetoid spread, including suspected or recurrent cases. RESULTS: All 14 cases met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up period after diagnosis was 4.5 (range, 0.1-13.0) years. Pagetoid spread before initial treatment was suspected in 12 cases (85.7%). Underlying rectal cancer was identified in 6 cases, and no primary tumor was detected in the other 6 cases. Seven patients had recurrent disease, with the median time to recurrence of 34.6 (range, 19.2-81.7) months. The time to the first relapse was 3 months, and that to the second relapse was 6 months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 90.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic and radiologic evaluation, as well as immunohistologic examination, should be performed. is to differentiate PPD with and without underlying anorectal carcinoma. The time to first recurrence varies widely, and long-term and regular follow-up for more than 5 years is considered necessary for local recurrence and distant metastasis.

Immunohistochemical Markers for Distinguishing Metastatic Breast Carcinoma from Other Common Malignancies: Update and Revisit.

Due to the high prevalence of breast cancer in the female, a metastasis from primary breast cancer is usually considered in the differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma in the female patient, even for those without a history of breast cancer, as some breast cancers are first diagnosed as metastases. Immunohistochemical analysis for breast cancer markers is the most common way to determine breast cancer origin besides clinical history and histology. In this review, we (1) summarize the commonly used and the newly identified breast cancer markers, including GCDFP-15, mammaglobin, GATA3, SOX10, and TRPS1; (2) point out the strengths and weaknesses of using these markers for breast cancers with luminal/epithelial or basal/myoepithelial differentiation; and (3) recommend diagnostic panels to differentiate breast carcinoma from carcinoma with similar morphology of other origins.

Sry-related high-mobility-group/HMG box 10 (SOX10) as a sensitive marker for triple-negative breast cancer.

AIMS: Confirmation of a breast origin for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is sometimes problematic. The traditional breast markers GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3), mammaglobin (MGB) and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP15) have shown limitations in identifying TNBC. Here, we aimed to examine the diagnostic potential of the newly proposed TNBC marker, Sry-related high-mobility-group/HMG box 10 (SOX10). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed and compared SOX10 expression with GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 expression in a test cohort of 1838 invasive breast cancers (IBCs) by using tissue microarrays. The findings from the test cohort were further examined with a validation cohort of 42 TNBCs in whole sections. The overall expression rates of SOX10, GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 were 6.9%, 83.1%, 47.0%, and 34.8%, respectively. Among the TNBCs within this cohort, the expression rates of SOX10, GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 were 31.3%, 34.5%, 27.9%, and 25.2%, respectively. SOX10 was strongly associated with TNBC (P < 0.001), whereas all other traditional markers were associated with non-TNBC (P < 0.001 for all). In addition, SOX10 was more correlated to basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) (P = 0.001) than five-marker-negative subtype among the TNBCs. A high expression rate of SOX10 (81%) was confirmed in the validation cohort. Additionally, SOX10 expression was inversely correlated with GATA3 and GCDFP15 expression, so they may complement each other in TNBC detection. The SOX10-GATA3 combination yielded a sensitivity of 60.3% for TNBC detection in the test cohort. CONCLUSION: SOX10 is a reliable marker for identifying TNBC, and complements GATA3. The SOX10-GATA3 combination may be used as a sensitive TNBC marker.

GATA-3 is superior to GCDFP-15 and mammaglobin to identify primary and metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Despite numerous studies on the utility of GATA-3 as breast cancer marker, its comparison with other breast markers, its concordance between primary and metastatic tumors and its expression in primary cancers from sites with frequent breast metastases remains unclear. METHODS: To address these questions, totally 993 invasive breast cancers (IBC), 254 paired nodal metastases, 23 distant metastases, and 208 lung carcinomas were included. GATA-3 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and compared to other breast markers [gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15) and mammaglobin (MGB)]. RESULTS: GATA-3 was expressed in 82.5% of IBC, predominantly in luminal (93.9%), and lower in non-luminal cancers [59.6% of HER2 overexpressing (HER2-OE) and 38.1% of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes]. GATA-3 identified more IBC than GCDFP-15 (23.9%) and MGB (46.6%). However, MGB showed a comparable sensitivity for non-luminal cancers to GATA-3. Combining MGB and GATA-3 improved sensitivity for both HER2-OE (80.8%) and TNBC cases (55.4%). GATA-3 showed a high sensitivity for nodal metastases and distant metastases, with good concordance with primary tumors. GATA-3 was expressed in 1.0% of lung carcinomas, with sensitivity and specificity of 82.5 and 99.0% in differentiating IBC and lung carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: GATA-3 expression was the highest in luminal breast carcinomas, and showed higher sensitivity than GCDFP-15 and MGB. However, in the poorly differentiated IBC, its utility was still limited. One should be aware of the possible GATA-3 expression in lung carcinomas.

Utility of different immunostains for diagnosis of metastatic breast carcinomas in both surgical and cytological specimens.

OBJECTIVE: A panel of immunostains is usually performed to confirm a metastatic carcinoma origin. GATA3 is a transcription factor and has been proven to be a useful marker for breast carcinoma. Other immunostains including mammaglobin (MGB), gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) are also used in diagnosing metastatic breast cancer. In this study, we aimed to compare the performance of these immunostains in the work up of metastatic breast carcinoma in both surgical and cytological specimens. STUDY DESIGN: This study cohort was composed of 242 metastatic breast carcinomas (142 surgical and 100 cytological specimens) during a study period from October 2013 to December 2015. Immunostain results of GATA3, CK7, MGB, GCDFP-15, ER and PR and their correlations were examined. RESULTS: In surgical specimens, GATA3 and CK7 were highly expressed (88% and 87%), but MGB and GCDFP-15 showed much lower positivity rates (43% and 29%). In cytological specimens, GATA3, CK7 and MGB showed similar positivity rates to those in surgical specimens; but GCDFP-15, ER and PR showed significantly lower positivity rates than those in surgical specimens. All ER-positive cases were positive for GATA3 in both surgical and cytological specimens; however, GATA3 positivity showed a significantly stronger correlation with ER positivity in surgical specimens than in cytological specimens. CONCLUSIONS: GATA3 and CK7 performed better than other immunostains to detect metastatic breast carcinoma in both surgical and cytological specimens. GATA3 expression was positively correlated with ER expression, and the correlation was stronger in surgical specimens than in cytological specimens.

GATA3 expression in clinically useful groups of breast carcinoma: a comparison with GCDFP15 and mammaglobin for identifying paired primary and metastatic tumors.

GATA3 has been recognized as the novel marker for identifying primary and metastatic breast carcinomas, consistently showing that GATA3 was significantly more sensitive than traditional markers gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP15) and mammaglobin (MGB). However, clinically useful groups of breast carcinomas status were not identified, which were determining appropriate treatment strategy, affecting the prognosis. In this study, we undertook a comparative study of the marker GATA3 and GCDFP15 and MGB in clinically useful groups of paired primary and metastatic breast cancer. We retrieved 64 cases of matched primary and metastatic breast cancer from the surgical pathology archive at our institution. According to the emerging 2015 St. Gallen Consensus, the clinically useful groups were divided into ER and/or PR (+), HER2 (-), abbreviated as A; ER and/or PR (+), HER2 (+), abbreviated as B; ER and PR (-), HER2 (+), abbreviated as C; ER, PR and HER2 (-), abbreviated as D; each group contained 16 cases (n=16). Tissue microarrays were created, with three 1-mm punch specimens from each case. The tissue microarrays were cut at 4-µm thickness and stained with monoclonal antibodies to GATA3, GCDFP15, and MGB. Staining intensity (0-3+) and extent (0%-100%) were scored with an H-score calculated (range, 0-300). Sensitivities by varying H-score cutoffs (any; ≥50; ≥150) for a positive result in the clinically useful groups of matched primary or metastatic breast cancer among GATA3, GCDFP15, and MGB. GATA3 was significantly more sensitive than GCDFP15 and MGB A and B groups (P<.05) rather than C and D groups (P>.05). However, GATA3 in conjunction with GCDFP15 and MGB detection could improve the sensitivity of C group (P<.05) rather than D group (P>.05). Significantly, good coincidence was observed between primary and metastatic tumor GATA3 expression (κ value = 0.826 >0.75) as compared with the coincidence of GCDFP15 (κ value =0.492 <0.75) and MGB (κ value =0.593 <0.75) (both P<.05). In conclusion, GATA3 expression did not show the same sensitivity for the clinically useful groups of breast cancer. GATA3 expression is positively correlated with ER-positive, PR-positive, and HER2-positive carcinomas. In addition, the matched primary and metastatic tumor expression of GATA3 shows good coincidence. We propose the careful selection of GATA3 for identifying hormone receptor negativity of breast cancer, especially in the case of triple-negative breast cancer.

Perianal Paget's disease: case report and review of the literature.

A peri-anal skin lesion, often eczema-like and with symptoms of pruritus, that does not resolve after classical local therapy should be biopsied. We present a case of peri-anal extramammary Paget's disease (EMDP) and associated anal adenocarcinoma. Reviewing the literature, more than 30% of patients with EMDP present a second primary tumour in their past, present or future history. In Europe, the risk of developing a new primary tumour in patients with this condition is increased compared with the standard population. In cases of peri-anal Paget's disease (PPD), specific histochemical markers allow us to differentiate between a primary and a secondary form, the secondary one is strongly associated with colorectal and anal tumours. We provide information about the most commonly suggested therapy for PPD with or without associated malignancy and about the recommended follow-up.

GATA-binding protein 3, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 and mammaglobin have distinct prognostic implications in different invasive breast carcinoma subgroups.

AIMS: To evaluate the prognostic significance of GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA-3), gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) and mammaglobin (MGB) in invasive breast carcinomas (IBCs). METHODS AND RESULTS: GATA-3, GCDFP-15 and MGB were expressed in 37.9% (370/976), 26.0% (254/978) and 35.3% (348/986) of this cohort of 1017 IBCs, respectively. GCDFP-15 was an independent favourable prognostic factor in all cases [disease-free survival (DFS), hazard ratio (HR) 0.587, P = 0.049; overall survival (OS), HR 0.512, P = 0.049], as well as in oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative (DFS, HR 0.353, P = 0.012; OS, HR 0.310, P = 0.017) and HER2-positive (DFS, HR 0.279, P = 0.036; OS, HR 0.235, P = 0.050) cases; it also refined the prognostication of molecular apocrine cancers. GATA-3 and MGB did not show any prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS: The commonly used breast carcinoma biomarkers vary in their prognostic implications. GCDFP-15 independently indicated a favourable prognosis, especially in ER-negative, HER2-positive and molecular apocrine cancers. GATA-3 and MGB were not associated with outcome.

GATA-binding protein 3 enhances the utility of gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 and mammaglobin A in triple-negative breast cancer by immunohistochemistry.

AIMS: We have demonstrated previously that gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) and mammaglobin A (MAM) are of limited utility in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA-3) is an emerging breast-associated immunohistochemical (IHC) marker with limited data in TNBC. Here, we examined GATA-3 expression in TNBC in comparison with GCDFP-15 and MAM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied GATA-3, GCDFP-15 and MAM IHC expression in 62 primary and 68 metastatic TNBCs. In primary TNBCs, GATA-3 staining was observed in 25 cases (40%), including 16 cases that were negative for GCDFP-15 and MAM. In metastatic TNBCs, GATA-3 staining was observed in 30 cases (44%), including 16 cases that were negative for GCDFP-15 and MAM. The expression frequency of any of the markers was 56% in primary and 62% in metastatic TNBCs. However, when focal staining was excluded, the expression frequency of any marker dropped to 31% and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSION: GATA-3 is expressed at a higher frequency by IHC in TNBC compared to GCDFP-15 and MAM, although the tissue specificity of the latter markers may be superior. When evaluating a triple-negative tumour, including GATA-3 in a panel of markers may increase the diagnostic accuracy for tissue origin in the appropriate clinical setting.

Low-grade cylindromatous adnexal carcinoma with unusual histopathological features: report of a case with comparative immunohistochemical study and meta-analysis of the literature.

We present an extremely rare case of low-grade cylindromatous adnexal carcinoma (CAC) on the right chest wall of a 77-year-old man. Histopathologically, the neoplasm was initially diagnosed as a cylindroma that developed over the course of 13 years. A diagnosis of low-grade CAC was rendered after the documentation of a local recurrence and histopathology of the recurrent tumor. To further assess the evolution of low-grade CAC over time, we compared the morphology, mitotic account, proliferative markers and adhesion molecule immunoreactivity among paired primary and recurrent tumors. Unlike those earlier reported, our case showed the maintenance of tumor morphology after a recurrence without areas of obvious malignant transformation or metaplastic change. We showed here for the first time the expression of adhesion molecules of CAC/spiradenoma and a comparison of proliferation indices between a primary tumor and its local recurrence. This peculiar tumor differs from previously reported cases and harbors a malignant potential although the histopathological features of malignancy are subtle. Our meta-analysis of the literature provided background information regarding this rare entity. Alterations of E-cadherin and GCDFP-15 expression may provide additional helpful clues in differential diagnosis and determining the clinical behavior of this unusual neoplasm. Further studies are warranted to confirm the potential discriminative role of these markers.

GATA3 expression in morphologic subtypes of breast carcinoma: a comparison with gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 and mammaglobin.

GATA3 is a transcription factor, which is involved in the growth and differentiation of several human tissues. Immunohistochemical staining for this marker has proven to be useful in recognizing a number of tumors, most notably those in the urinary tract and breasts. To date, no study has specifically assessed the distribution of GATA3 among different histomorphologic subtypes of breast carcinoma. The surgical pathology archive at our institution was searched, to retrieve cases of breast carcinomas of the following microscopic types-ductal, lobular, mucinous, metaplastic, medullary, apocrine, signet-ring cell, and micropapillary. Tissue microarrays were created, with four 0.6-mm punch specimens from each case. The tissue microarrays were cut at a 5-µm thickness and stained with monoclonal antibodies to GATA3 (Biocare Medical Inc, Concord, CA), mammaglobin (Dako, Carpinteria, CA), and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (Dako). Tumors were considered to be positive for those markers if more than 5% of the cells were labeled. Of 55 ductal adenocarcinomas, 51 (92.7%) expressed GATA3. All 4 GATA3-negative tumors were Nottingham grade III lesions that were also nonreactive for estrogen receptor protein. GATA3 was present in 28 (96.6%) of 29 lobular adenocarcinomas, 10 (90.9%) of 11 apocrine adenocarcinomas, 10 (83.3%) of 12 medullary carcinomas, 5 (55.5%) of 9 metaplastic carcinomas, and 1 of 2 signet-ring cell carcinomas. Mucinous carcinomas (23 cases) and micropapillary carcinomas (12 cases) uniformly and strongly labeled for GATA3. GATA3 equaled or surpassed the sensitivity of mammaglobin and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 in all histologic subgroups of breast cancer in the study. Although most ductal adenocarcinomas were labeled for GATA3, it was absent in high-grade tumors that also lacked estrogen receptor protein. Favorable prognosis types of breast carcinoma (eg, mucinous carcinoma) and aggressive variants such as micropapillary carcinoma were equally reactive for this marker. A proportion of medullary and metaplastic carcinomas was GATA3 negative (17% and 44%, respectively). Thus, those pathologic entities cannot be excluded diagnostically by an absence of GATA3 immunoreactivity.

TRPS1, a sensitive marker for different histological and molecular types of breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We explored Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) expression in special types of breast carcinoma, and analyzed the correlation between TRPS1 and androgen receptor (AR) expression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: TRPS1 expression was analyzed in 801 patients with special types of breast carcinoma. A total of 969 TNBC were used to analyze the correlation between the expression of TRPS1 and AR. TRPS1 expression was evaluated in 1975 cases of breast cancer with different molecular types. RESULTS: A total of 801 special types of breast cancers were stained with TRPS1.TRPS1 was positive in 100% (63/63) of mucinous carcinoma, 100% (7/7) adenoid cystic carcinomas (4 classic adenoid cystic carcinomas and 3 solid-basaloid adenoid cystic carcinomas), 100% (4/4) tubular carcinomas, 100% (2/2) secretory carcinomas, and 99.59% (243/244) invasive lobular carcinomas, 99.26% (267/269) invasive micropapillary carcinomas, 97.44% (38/39) ER-positive neuroendocrine tumors, 94.44% (34/36) metaplastic breast carcinomas (MBCs), 63.73% (65/102) apocrine carcinomas. TRPS1 was negative in all triple-negative neuroendocrine carcinomas (0/7).TRPS1 was positive in 92.86% (26/28) of metastatic special types of breast cancer. TRPS1 and AR expression were analyzed in 969 cases of TNBC. 90.40% were positive for TRPS1, and 42.41% were positive for AR. A significant inverse correlation between TRPS1 and AR expression was shown in TNBC (p < .001). TRPS1 showed a higher positive rate (93.13%) in TNBC compared to GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3), gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15) and forkhead box transcription Factor C 1 (FOXC1). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study demonstrated that TRPS1 is a highly sensitive marker for most special types of breast carcinoma. TRPS1 was positive in 63.73% of apocrine carcinomas. TRPS1 and AR expression was inversely correlated in TNBC.

Immunoexpression of the GCDFP-15 Marker in Different Grades of Breast Carcinoma.

Background & Objective: During the last decade, biological markers of breast cancer have been considered to predict the degree of histology, behavior, and extent of tumor invasion and the possibility of lymph node involvement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of GCDFP-15 in different grades of invasive ductal carcinoma, as the most common type of breast cancer. Methods: In this retrospective study, paraffin blocks of tumors of 60 breast cancer patients registered in the histopathology laboratory of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Ahvaz between 2019 and 2020 were reviewed. Information on grade, invasion, stage and lymph node involvement was extracted from the pathology reports and immunohistochemical staining for GCDFP-15 was performed. Data were analyzed by SPSS 22. Results: GCDFP-15 marker expression was observed in 20 out of 60 breast cancer patients (33.3%). GCDFP-15 staining intensity was weak in 7 cases (35%), moderate in 8 cases (40%), and strong in 5 cases (25%). The patient's age and sex showed no significant relationship with the expression of GCDFP-15 and intensity of staining. Expression of the GCDFP-15 marker was correlated significantly with tumor grade, stage, and vascular invasion (P<0.05)) and its expression was higher in tumors with a lower grade, less depth of invasion, and no vascular invasion but unrelated to perineural invasion, lymph node involvement, and tumor size. The intensity of staining for GCDFP-15 showed significant relationship with the tumor grade (P<0.0001) but unrelated to the other factors. Conclusion: GCDFP-15 marker may be significantly associated with tumor grade, depth of invasion, and vascular invasion, thus can be used as a prognostic marker.

Comparison of GATA-3, Mammaglobin and GCDFP-15 Expression in Primary, Metastatic and Triple Negative Breast Carcinomas: An Indian Scenario.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Mammaglobin and GCDFP-15 are traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers utilized to recognize metastasis of breast carcinoma in an unknown primary. GATA-3 is increasingly being used as a marker of primary breast origin. This study was done to evaluate and compare GATA-3 with GCDFP-15 and Mammaglobin in invasive primary including metastatic and triple negative breast carcinomas. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for GATA-3, GCDFP-15 and Mammaglobin was applied on 100 cases of primary breast carcinomas, including 20 triple negative cases and 30 cases of metastatic breast carcinomas. Staining scores were given for each marker by multiplying the percentage of positive tumor cells by the intensity of staining (1+, 2+ or 3+), with scores ranging from 0 to 300. Staining score of 1 or more was considered positive. RESULTS: GATA-3 was expressed in 92% of primary, 80% of metastatic and 60% of triple negative breast carcinomas, with an average staining score of 270. Mammaglobin was expressed in 68% of primary, 56.6% of metastatic and 25% of triple negative breast carcinomas, with an average staining score of 180. GCDFP-15 was expressed in 48% of primary, 26.6% of metastatic and 05% of breast carcinomas, with an average staining score of 60. GATA-3 demonstrated to have higher staining score (average of 270) than other two markers in maximum number of cases. CONCLUSION: GATA-3 has a higher sensitivity and increased staining scores in primary breast carcinomas, metastatic breast carcinomas as well as in triple negative breast carcinomas.

Evaluation of GATA3 and GCDFP15 Expression in Triple Negative Breast Cancers.

Background & Objective: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. There are some different types of breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer is the type in which no receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 are expressed. Identifying factors that can facilitate the diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer is important. In this study, we decided to investigate the expression of GATA3 and GCDFP15 genes in triple-negative breast cancers. Methods: This is a retrospective descriptive-analytical study that was performed on 50 specimens of samples of triple-negative breast cancer. Data including age and sex, tumor grade, tumor size, types of invasion, GATA-3, and GCDFP-15 were assessed. Results: The mean age of the patients was 48.3±14.17 years. Of the total specimens, 46% were positive for GCDFP15 and 90% were positive for GATA-3. The intensity of GATA3 was evaluated and it was observed that 33(73.3%) of the cells were strongly stained and 12(26.7%) were weakly stained. There were no relationships between GATA-3 and GCDFP-15 with tumor characteristics. Conclusion: GATA-3 and GCDFP-15 may serve as diagnostic markers for triple-negative breast cancers and GATA-3 seems to be more reliable.

Prognostic Role of Prolactin-Induced Protein (PIP) in Breast Cancer.

Prolactin-inducible protein (PIP), also referred to as gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15), has been a trending topic in recent years due to its potential role as a specific marker in breast cancer. PIP binds to aquaporin-5 (AQP5), CD4, actin, fibrinogen, ß-tubulin, serum albumin, hydroxyapatite, zinc α2-glycoprotein, and the Fc fragment of IgGs, and the expression of PIP has been demonstrated to be modulated by various cytokines, including IL4/13, IL1, and IL6. PIP gene expression has been extensively studied due to its captivating nature. It is influenced by various factors, with androgens, progesterone, glucocorticosteroids, prolactin, and growth hormone enhancing its expression while estrogens suppress it. The regulatory mechanisms involve important proteins such as STAT5A, STAT5B, Runx2, and androgen receptor, which collaborate to enhance PIP gene transcription and protein production. The expression level of PIP in breast cancer is dependent on the tumor stage and subtype. Higher expression is observed in early-stage tumors of the luminal A subtype, while lower expression is associated with luminal B, basal-like, and triple-negative subtypes, which have a poorer prognosis. PIP expression is also correlated with apocrine differentiation, hormone receptor positivity, and longer metastasis-free survival. PIP plays a role in supporting the immune system's antitumor response during the early stages of breast cancer development. However, as cancer progresses, the protective role of PIP may become less effective or diminished. In this work, we summarized the clinical significance of the PIP molecule in breast cancer and its potential role as a new candidate for cell-based therapies.

Cytokeratin 7: a re-evaluation of the 'tried and true' in triple-negative breast cancers.

AIMS: Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are often poorly differentiated tumours that can present clinically as metastases of an unknown primary. Immunohistochemical panels are frequently used to determine the likelihood of a breast primary, but in this tumour subset cytokeratin (CK)7 may be the only positive finding. In this study we aimed to evaluate a commonly employed immunohistochemical panel using a large group of TNBCs (both basal-like and unclassified), and to analyse the CK7 staining patterns. METHODS AND RESULTS: Tissue microarrays containing 138 TNBCs were stained with antibodies against CK7, CK20, gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15), and mammaglobin. CK5/6 staining was used to identify basal-like tumours. CK7 staining was notably heterogeneous, with 14.5% of all cases demonstrating ≤20% tumour cell staining. A greater proportion of basal-like TNBCs than of unclassified TNBCs showed focal staining. GCDFP-15 and mammaglobin were not expressed in the majority of TNBCs, and were less frequently positive in basal-like than in unclassified TNBCs. CONCLUSION: TNBCs are commonly negative for most immunomarkers indicative of breast origin, with the exception of CK7. As about one in five TNBCs showed only focal CK7 positivity, use of this marker must be interpreted with caution, especially in small samples, so that the possibility of a breast primary is not overlooked.

Unusual staining of immunohistochemical markers PAX8 and CDX2 in breast carcinoma: a potential diagnostic pitfall.

Knowing the sensitivity and specificity of tissue-specific immunohistochemical markers is crucial for accurate determination of the primary tumor site. PAX8 has been used as a diagnostic marker for carcinomas of the gynecologic tract, kidney, and thyroid gland, and CDX2 has been used as a marker of gastrointestinal carcinoma. Neither is considered a marker for breast carcinoma (BC). However, we have encountered BCs that express PAX8 or CDX2, some of which caused diagnostic confusion. We investigated the immunohistochemical staining frequency of PAX8 and CDX2 in BC. We identified 237 BCs for which PAX8 staining results were reported (102 primary and 135 metastatic BCs); seven primary and four metastatic BCs (4.6%) were positive for PAX8, with various intensities and staining patterns. CDX2 staining results were reported for 271 BCs (78 primary and 193 metastatic); four primary BCs and one metastatic BC (1.8%) were positive for CDX2, ranging from focal and weak to diffuse and strong. We also stained primary invasive BCs with PAX8 and CDX2 using tissue microarrays. None of the 332 PAX8-stained cases was positive, while one of 143 CDX2-stained cases was positive. Four PAX8-positive and three CDX2-positive cases were stained with TRPS1, and all were positive for TRPS1. In addition, we reviewed the literature for PAX8 and CDX2 expression in BCs and found 5.5% PAX8-positive BCs (90/1625) in 17 studies and 0.8% CDX-2 positive BCs (7/909) in 20 studies. PAX8 and CDX2 are infrequently expressed in BC by immunohistochemistry, and in rare cases, the staining can be strong and diffuse. Additional diagnostic markers are necessary and helpful in distinguishing breast from other primary origins.

Gross Cystic Disease Fluid Protein-15 (GCDFP-15) Expression Characterizes Breast Mucinous Carcinomas in Older Women.

The predominant histological subtype of breast mucinous carcinoma in older women is type B (hypercellular type), and, in younger women, it is type A (hypocellular type). The characteristics of mucinous carcinomas of the same histological subtype may differ between older and younger women. This study aims to systematically clarify the pathological/immunohistochemical features of mucinous carcinomas. A total of 21 surgical cases of mucinous carcinoma (type A/B: 9/12 cases) in the older group (≥65 years) and 16 cases (type A/B: 14/2 cases) in the younger group (≤55 years) (n = 37) were included. Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) and eight other markers were used for immunostaining. The GCDFP-15-positive rate in the older group was high regardless of the histological subtype (type A, 77.8%; type B, 91.7%). The GCDFP-15 positivity in the older group was significantly higher than that in the younger group (p < 0.001 for Allred score). Among type A, GCDFP-15 positivity was significantly higher in the older group than in the younger group (p = 0.042 for the Allred score and p = 0.007 for the positivity rate). The present results suggest that GCDFP-15 expression characterizes mucinous carcinomas in older women.

An elderly woman with multilobulated breast mass presenting as a diagnostic dilemma: A rare case report.

A breast mass in women often presents a diagnostic challenge due to the diversity in the diagnosis. We herein report a rare variant of breast carcinoma, an invasive apocrine carcinoma (AC), in an elderly woman where the breast mass clinically mimicked phyllodes tumour. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed the tumour as triple-negative and also negative for androgen receptor (AR). Gross cystic disease fluid protein (GCDFP-15) was strongly and diffusely positive. It is an exceptional finding. It implies its significance as a diagnostic marker of AC of the breast. The accurate diagnostic criteria of AC are still lacking. Patients with breast lumps offer unique challenges and enormous responsibility to primary and family care physicians.