Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Gallbladder Polyps.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of gallbladder polyps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 296 patients diagnosed with gallbladder polyps. The study observed the changes in lesions post-procedure within the ablation group, and compared whether there was a difference in the gallbladder contraction rate in patients before and after ablation. It also compared the liver function indicators before and after surgery, some indicators during the periprocedural period, and the incidence of complications in two groups of patients. RESULTS: In the ablation group, all lesions (84/84) were completely ablated, and the absorption effect of the ablation lesions was good after the ablation. No significant differences were observed in the gallbladder contraction rate before ablation compared to 1 month and 3 months post-ablation (p > 0.05). After the operation, statistically significant differences were observed in ALT and TP between the two groups (all p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, procedural time, postprocedural mobilization time, postprocedural exhaust time, postprocedural eating time, and VAS score on postprocedural day 3 (all p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (x2=0.477，p = 0.490). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that ultrasound-guided RFA is a safe, effective, and feasible treatment for gallbladder polyps, as it not only effectively eliminates the polyps but also preserves the physiological functions of the gallbladder.

Analysis of quality of life in patients after transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery.

BACKGROUND: At present, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the main surgical treatment for gallstones. But, after gallbladder removal, there are many complications. Therefore, it is hoped to remove stones while preserving the function of the gallbladder, and with the development of endoscopic technology, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery came into being. AIM: To compare the quality of life, perioperative indicators, adverse events after LC and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery (EGPS) in patients with gallstones. METHODS: Patients who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from 2020 to 2022 were retrospectively collected. We adopted propensity score matching (1:1) to compare EGPS and LC patients. RESULTS: A total of 662 cases were collected, of which 589 cases underwent LC, and 73 cases underwent EGPS. Propensity score matching was performed, and 40 patients were included in each of the groups. In the EGPS group, except the gastrointestinal defecation (P = 0.603), the total score, physical well-being, mental well-being, and gastrointestinal digestion were statistically significant compared with the preoperative score after surgery (P < 0.05). In the LC group, except the mental well-being, the total score, physical well-being, gastrointestinal digestion, the gastrointestinal defecation was statistically significant compared with the preoperative score after surgery (P < 0.05). When comparing between groups, gastrointestinal defecation had significantly difference (P = 0.002) between the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the total postoperative score and the other three subscales. In the surgery duration, hospital stay and cost, LC group were lower than EGPS group. The recurrence factors of gallstones after EGPS were analyzed: and recurrence was not correlated with gender, age, body mass index, number of stones, and preoperative score. CONCLUSION: Whether EGPS or LC, it can improve the patient's symptoms, and the EGPS has less impact on the patient's defecation. It needed to, prospective, multicenter, long-term follow-up, large-sample related studies to prove.

Transgastric versus transrectal: Which access route is the best for NOTES gallbladder-preserving gallstone therapy?

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and safety of transgastric and transrectal pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for cholecystolithotomy. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective comparative study of consecutive patients who underwent pure NOTES for either transrectal or transgastric gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy between September 2017 and April 2020. Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were assigned for transrectal or transgastric NOTES based on the patients' choice. Treatment success, postoperative pain, peritonitis, time to resume normal diet, and duration of hospitalization were compared. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100%. Forty-eight patients underwent successful NOTES cholecystolithotomy via the transrectal (n = 26) or transgastric route (n = 22). One (3.8%) patient in the transrectal NOTES group experienced postoperative abdominal pain compared to 6 (27.3%) in the transgastric NOTES group (P = 0.04). Fever and bile peritonitis developed in one (3.8%) patient in the transrectal NOTES group versus 8 (36.4%) in the transgastric NOTES group (P = 0.005). A postoperative fluid diet was commenced at 6 h with the transrectal approach versus on day 3 for the transgastric NOTES group. The mean postoperative hospitalization for transrectal and transgastric NOTES groups was 4.5 days versus 7 days (P = 0.001). Three patients in the transgastric NOTES group developed postoperative gastric fistula. CONCLUSIONS: Transrectal NOTES has advantages over transgastric NOTES, including preserved spatial orientation, relatively easier removal of specimens, early food intake, shorter hospitalization, fewer postoperative complications and less pain. Multicenter clinical trials with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of both approaches.

Are laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy truly comparable? A propensity matched study.

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment option for symptomatic gallstones. However, another option is gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy which preserves the normal physiological functions of the gallbladder in patients desiring to avoid surgical resection. AIM: To compare the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for symptomatic gallstones. METHODS: We adopted propensity score matching (1:1) to compare trans-rectal NOTES cholecystolithotomy and LC patients with symptomatic gallstones. We reviewed 2511 patients with symptomatic gallstones from December 2017 to December 2020; 517 patients met the matching criteria (NOTES, 110; LC, 407), yielding 86 pairs. RESULTS: The technical success rate for the NOTES group was 98.9% vs 100% for the LC group. The median procedure time was 119 min [interquartile ranges (IQRs), 95-175] with NOTES vs 60 min (IQRs, 48-90) with LC (P < 0.001). The frequency of post-operative pain was similar between NOTES and LC: 4.7% (4/85) vs 5.8% (5/95) (P = 0.740). The median duration of post-procedure fasting with NOTES was 1 d (IQRs, 1-2) vs 2 d with LC (IQRs, 1-3) (P < 0.001). The median post-operative hospital stay for NOTES was 4 d (IQRs, 3-6) vs 4 d for LC (IQRs, 3-5), (P = 0.092). During follow-up, diarrhea was significantly less with NOTES (5.8%) compared to LC (18.6%) (P = 0.011). Gallstones and cholecystitis recurrence within a median of 12 mo (range: 6-40 mo) following NOTES was 10.5% and 3.5%, respectively. Concerns regarding the presence of abdominal wall scars were present in 17.4% (n = 15/86) of patients following LC (mainly women). CONCLUSION: NOTES provides a feasible new alternative scar-free treatment for patients who are unwilling or unable to undergo cholecystectomy. This minimally invasive organ-sparing procedure both removes the gallstones and preserves the physiological function of the gallbladder. Reducing gallstone recurrence is essential to achieving widespread clinical adoption of NOTES.

Reconsideration of indications for choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery and preventive measures for postoperative recurrence of gallstones.

INTRODUCTION: The recurrence of cholecystolithiasis after choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery is a major problem. It is unclear whether the recurrence of cholecystolithiasis is due to the limitations of the operation itself or to the selection of inappropriate candidates. AIM: To analyze the recurrence of cholecystolithiasis after choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery and to provide guidance for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis by choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 145 patients who had undergone choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery were studied from January 2012 to January 2018. The recurrence rate, recurrence time, and risk factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Of these 145 patients, 14 (9.66%) experienced recurrence with a mean follow-up time of 39.72 ±24.44 months. The mean time to recurrence was 30.07 ±21.21 months. Univariate analysis showed that pregnancy history (p = 0.008), the uniformity of gallstones (p = 0.002), preoperative inflammation (p = 0.022), postoperative oral drugs (p = 0.022) and the regularity of diet (p = 0.001) were significantly related to recurrence. The uniformity of gallstones (odds ratio (OR) = 0.079; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.010-0.590; p = 0.013) and the regularity of diet (OR = 0.074; 95% CI: 0.010-0.528; p = 0.009) were independent prognostic factors for recurrence according to multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Nonuniform gallstones combined with an irregular diet are significant risk factors that predict cholecystolithiasis recurrence.

Feasibility of liver graft procurement with donor gallbladder preservation in living donor liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Cholecystectomy is routinely performed at most transplant centers during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of liver graft procurement with donor gallbladder preservation in LDLT. METHODS: Eighty-nine LDLTs (from June 2006 to Dec 2012) were retrospectively analyzed at our hospital. The surgical approach for liver graft procurement with donor gallbladder preservation was assessed, and the anatomy of the cystic artery, the morphology and contractibility of the preserved gallbladder, postoperative symptoms, and vascular and biliary complications were compared among donors with or without gallbladder preservation. RESULTS: Twenty-eight donors (15 right and 13 left-liver grafts) successfully underwent liver graft procurement with gallbladder preservation. Among the 15 right lobectomy donors, for 12 cases (80.0 %) the cystic artery originated from right hepatic artery. From the left hepatic artery and proper hepatic artery accounted for 6.7 % (1/15), respectively. Postoperative symptoms among these 28 donors were slight, although donors with cholecystectomy often complained of fatty food aversion, dyspepsia, and diarrhea during an average follow-up of 58.6 (44-78) months. The morphology and contractibility of the preserved gallbladders were comparable with normal status; the rate of contraction was 53.8 and 76.7 %, respectively, 30 and 60 min after ingestion of a fatty meal. Biliary and vascular complications among donors and recipients, irrespective of gallbladder preservation, were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that for donors compliant with anatomical requirements, liver graft procurement with gallbladder preservation for the donor is feasible and safe. The preserved gallbladder was assessed as functioning well and postoperative symptoms as a result of cholecystectomy were significantly reduced during long-term follow-up.

Totally laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery: A minimally invasive and favorable approach for cholelithiasis.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery (L-GPS) for cholelithiasis and the feasibility and value of totally laparoscopic GPS (TL-GPS). A total of 517 patients underwent L-GPS, including 365 cases of laparoscopy-assisted GPS (LA-GPS), 143 cases of TL-GPS (preservation rate, 98.3%) and nine conversions to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The surgeries were all performed by one medical team and the mean operating time was 72 min. All macroscopic calculi were removed through endoscopy. The number of calculi observed in the patients was between one and several dozen; diameters ranged between 0.1 and 2.5 cm. Only three cases of incisional infection were noted in the LA-GPS group and long-term follow-up showed a low recurrence rate of 1.2%. L-GPS is, therefore, an excellent approach to cure cholelithiasis and TL-GPS is a feasible and effective option that could avoid incisional complications.

Research progress of intramural gallstone / 国际外科学杂志

Intramural gallstone is a special kind of gallstone and the mechanism may be related with increasing pressure in gallbladder lumen,inflammation of gallbladder and the formation of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses in the gallbladder wall.There is a close relationship between intramural gallstone and lumen stone.Intramural gallstone provides a new challenge to cholecystolithotomy with gallbladder preservation.But study on intramural gallstone may also offer a new idea for the mechanism of gallstone formation.

Comparison of Laparoscopy and Open Surgery for Gallbladder Preservation in Patients with Cholelithiasis / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To compare the surgical effects of laparoscopy and open mini-incision surgery in cholelithotomy with the gallbladder being preserved.MethodsFrom April 2006 to May 2008,63 cases of cholelithiasis received cholelithotomy with the gallbladder being preserved in our hospital by laparoscopy(n=33) or mini-incision open surgery(n=30).The operation time,recovery time of gastrointestinal function,rates of postoperative analgesics use and complications,inpatient charge,and drug expense after the operation were analyzed.ResultsThe mean operation time in laparoscopy group was significantly longer than that in open group [(66.4?10.6) min vs(60.6?9.8) min,t=2.248,P=0.020)].And the inpatient charge in laparoscopy group was significantly higher than that in the open group [(7865?992) yuan vs(6995?825) yuan,t=3.765,P=0.000)].Whereas,the recovery time of the gastrointestinal tract and postoperative hospital stay in the laparoscopy group was significantly shorter than those in the other [(22.7?6.9) h vs(36.9?17.2) h,t=-4.374,P=0.000);(4.8?1.5)d vs(10.0?7.4) d,t=-3.951,P=0.000)].In the laparoscopy group,only one patient showed complication(periumbilical infection) after the treatment,while in the open group,2 patients developed incisional hematoma,2 showed incisional infection,3 had pelvic effusion,and 1 suffered from adhesive intestinal obstruction(?2=5.369,P=0.020).ConclusionsLaparoscopy is a good choice for cholelithotomy with the gallbladder being preserved,for it is minimally invasive,and thus leads to less surgical trauma,quicker recovery,fewer complications,and shorter hospital stay after the procedure.