Surgical Procedures of the Correction of Severe Static Glabellar Lines by Utilizing Resection with Free Dermal Fat Grafting (FDFG).

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin alone is unable to sufficiently reduce the muscle in cases of severe static glabellar lines due to the folded skin and dermal breakdown that frequently accompany these conditions. Augmentation of the soft tissue and removal of folded skin at the same time is the final solution. To simultaneously resolve interbrow skin laxity and replenish tissue volume, we present for the first time the method of glabellar lines excision combined with FDFG. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 23 patients with moderate-to-severe static glabellar lines underwent resection and/or free dermal fat grafting (FDFG) from June 2022 to June 2023. Fifteen of them underwent glabellar lines excision combined with FDFG, and seven were filled only. These patients were followed up at least 6 months to evaluate the effect. We utilized FACE-Q and WSRS for assessment in order to investigate the clinical results. RESULTS: There is no complication such as discoloration, hematoma, infection and palpability in all cases. After 6-15 months of follow-up, all the patients' dynamic and static lines were improved to a certain degree, and the patients were satisfied with the results with the WSRS score decreased from 3.5 ± 0.47 to 1.8 ± 0.62, and FACE-Q assessments in "Line between the eyebrows" decreased from 87 ± 7.39 to 43 ± 10.3. CONCLUSIONS: Resection in conjunction with FDFG is a brief, innovative and effective technique to correct static and dynamic severe glabellar wrinkles and maintain an acceptable outcome over an extended period of time which worthy clinical promotion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

A Phase III Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A (MASPORT) with DYSPORT for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin type A is a widely used treatment of facial wrinkles. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a new botulinum toxin type A (Masport [abobotulinum toxin A], MasoonDarou Co) with DYSPORT® for the treatment of glabellar lines. METHODS: 262 subjects with moderate-to-severe glabellar lines received either a fixed dose of 50 units of MASPORT® or DYSPORT® (Ipsen Company, England). Subjects were followed up at 14, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days after injection. Efficacy was assessed by investigator at maximum frown and rest and also by Subject Global Assessment of Change (SGA). The responders were defined as persons with +2 grade improvement from baseline for both investigator and patient assessment. The occurrence and duration of adverse effects were recorded up throughout the study. RESULTS: According to the investigator evaluations, the responder rate at maximum frown were 94.5% for MASPORT and 95.6% for DYSPORT group on day 30 and at rest were 85.45% and 85.68% for MASPORT and DYSPORT group, respectively. According to the subject self-assessment, the proportion of responders in MASPORT group at day 30 was 95.28% versus 97.04% for DYSPORT group. No serious drug related adverse effect was recorded in either study groups, and the rates of adverse effects were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: Abobotulinum toxin A [MASPORT] is equally safe and effective as commercial product [DYSPORT] for the treatment of glabellar lines with the dose of 50 units, up to 120 days. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Resolving the Controversy Surrounding the Function of the Corrugator Supercilii Muscle.

INTRODUCTION: The corrugator supercilii muscle (CSM) has traditionally been recognized as a primary depressor of the eyebrows, playing a key role in expressing negative emotions and contributing to the formation of glabellar lines. However, recent studies indicate that the CSM may exhibit movements contrary to those previously documented, suggesting a more complex functional role. This research re-evaluates the anatomical and functional roles of the CSM and discusses their implications for botulinum toxin treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, intrapersonal comparative, and split-face study was conducted over a five-year period, from January 6, 2019, to January 6, 2024, involving 298 patients who underwent botulinum toxin injections. The study divided participants into seven groups, each targeting specific anatomical areas of the CSM and associated muscles. Injection techniques were varied to assess their impact on brow dynamics, with outcomes measured by changes in eyebrow position and expression lines. RESULTS: The study demonstrated that targeting specific portions of the CSM and depressor supercilii muscle (DSM) leads to distinct outcomes in brow elevation and the reduction of expression lines. However, this approach was also frequently associated with the development of omega-shaped wrinkles. Split-face evaluations further validated that the modified injection techniques achieved superior eyebrow elevation compared to traditional methods. CONCLUSION: This study challenges the traditional view of the CSM as primarily a brow depressor, highlighting its role in medial brow elevation. These findings underscore the need for a nuanced approach in esthetic medicine, particularly in botulinum toxin injections, to achieve balanced and natural facial expressions. Understanding the full range of CSM functions is crucial for optimizing esthetic outcomes and enhancing patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

DaxibotulinumtoxinA-lanm (Daxxify™): A Comprehensive Overview.

Botulinum toxin A (BoNTA) is produced by Clostridium botulinum and widely used for aesthetic indications requiring neuromuscular blockade. For dynamic facial lines, BoNTA is effective and safe, but also temporary, requiring repeat injections approximately every 3-4 months for maintenance of effects. There is a desire by both patients and providers for a longer-lasting neurotoxin to prevent periods of suboptimal correction. Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in September 2022, daxibotulinumtoxinA for injection (DAXI or Daxxify™) is the first long-lasting BoNTA formulated with a 150-kDa BoNTA (RTT150) and proprietary stabilizing excipient peptide (RTP004) in place of human serum albumin. DAXI is approved for treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines. The median duration of effect was 6 months and results lasted as long as 9 months in some patients. Its unique formulation and prolonged effectiveness positions DAXI as a safe, novel BoNTA for improved durability and patient satisfaction.

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) has been used in aesthetic applications worldwide, including glabellar lines. Currently, four BoNT/A preparations were approved for the improvement of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines: onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA, incobotulinumtoxinA, and prabotulinumtoxinA. DaxibotulinumtoxinA is a new form of BoNT/A drug that is developed in clinical application. We performed this network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess the efficacy and safety of all these different BoNT/A formulations for treating glabellar lines. METHODS: The investigators searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms "botulinum toxin" and "glabellar lines." We searched the relevant studies in electronic databases as following: PubMed, Elsevier, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. The end points included the percentage of subjects with a glabellar line severity (GLS) score of none (0) or mild (1), and the percentage of subjects achieving ≥ 1-point and 2-point improvement in glabellar line severity at maximum frown at approximately month 1 by the investigators' assessment. RESULTS: All formulations of BoNT/A were far superior to placebo in efficacy. DaxibotulinumtoxinA was the only treatment that significantly increased the proportion of subjects achieving ≥ 1 point improvement in GLS score compared with other BoNT/A formulations. Moreover, daxibotulinumtoxinA was ranked the highest for the proportion of subjects achieving ≥ 2-point improvement in GLS score. No significant differences were revealed for the incidence of any adverse events (AEs) that related to treatment or drug among all BoNT/A preparations. CONCLUSION: The overall results of this NMA suggested that daxibotulinumtoxinA is a new BoNT/A preparation that may be not only more effective but also well-tolerated for the treatment of glabellar lines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

PrabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines.

OBJECTIVE: PrabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs (Jeuveau), a botulinum toxin type A, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines in February 2019. This article will review phase II and III clinical trials to assess the efficacy, safety, and clinical application of this novel, aesthetic-only drug. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature review was performed using the terms "glabellar lines AND prabotulinumtoxinA" in the PubMed database. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify nonpublished studies. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Articles written in English between November 2019 and June 2020 discussing phase II and phase III clinical trials were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: By the primary efficacy end point on day 30, more patients achieved a greater than 2-point improvement on the Glabellar Line Scale (GLS) at maximum frown compared with baseline on day 0. The proportions of participants who responded to treatment with prabotulinumtoxinA were 67.5% and 70.4% versus 1.2% and 1.3% in placebo groups across 2 identical clinical trials (P < 0.001). Patients receiving prabotulinumtoxinA experienced greater improvement in GLS at maximum frown on day 30 (87.2%) compared with onabotulinumtoxinA (82.8%) and placebo (4.2%; P < 0.001). PrabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated across all studies. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review provides a detailed analysis of the safety and efficacy of prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs and includes special considerations to help guide patients and clinicians. CONCLUSION: PrabotulinumtoxinA is a safe and effective new addition to the repository of available treatments for the appearance of glabellar lines.

Hyperhidrosis and Aesthetics.

When one considers the avalanche of new indications and uses for botulinum toxins, it is truly surprising that this has all happened in such a short time. And the safety and dependability of these products are profound, when used appropriately. There is still much to be discovered about the potential of this agent when you contemplate the profound non-cosmetic benefits reported by clinicians and scientists from around the world. The mechanism of action has been studied in depth, and yet the benefits appreciated by people with chronic migraine or major depressive disorder, for instance, are unlikely to be explained by our current mechanistic understanding. Given that these toxins control acetylcholine at the motor end plates, and given that acetylcholine is central to practically every cell in the body, it will not be surprising to find that botulinum toxin researchers will be enjoying many decades of fruitful studies. The advent of the non-surgical aesthetic physician has helped push the clinical utilization of botulinum toxins well beyond its original adoption by oculoplastic surgeons in their patients with blepharospasm. We can expect that the next edition of this book to have a dozen or more new indications which will surprise us all.

DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection has a prolonged duration of response in the treatment of glabellar lines: Pooled data from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2).

BACKGROUND: DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is a novel botulinum toxin type A in clinical development. Phase 2 data have shown it offers a more prolonged duration of response than onabotulinumtoxinA. OBJECTIVE: To further evaluate the efficacy, duration of response, and safety of 40 U DAXI compared with placebo in the treatment of glabellar lines. METHODS: Two identical, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies were performed (NCT03014622 and NCT03014635 on www.clinicaltrials.gov). Participants with moderate or severe glabellar lines were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 40 U DAXI or placebo into the corrugator/procerus muscles. Glabellar line severity was assessed by investigators and participants for up to 36 weeks (≥24 weeks). RESULTS: Among 609 participants enrolled (405 DAXI, 204 placebo), 92% completed. DAXI was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing glabellar line severity and maintained none or mild glabellar line severity for a median of 24.0 weeks. It was also generally well tolerated-treatment-related adverse effects were most commonly headache (6.4% vs 2.0%) and injection site pain (3.7% vs 3.9%). LIMITATIONS: The study population was predominantly female and white and received only a single treatment. CONCLUSIONS: DAXI offers a prolonged duration of response for glabellar line reduction and is well tolerated.

Assessment of Subject and Physician Satisfaction after Long-Term Treatment of Glabellar Lines with AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®/Azzalure®): Primary Results of the APPEAL Noninterventional Study.

BACKGROUND: Although the short- and long-term effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®/Azzalure®) for glabellar line (GL) treatment is well established, reporting of subject satisfaction over repeat treatment cycles is limited. The APPEAL study aimed to assess subject satisfaction with long-term GL treatment with abobotulinumtoxinA in a real-life setting. METHODS: APPEAL was a noninterventional, prospective, longitudinal study in subjects administered ≥ 3 abobotulinumtoxinA injection cycles for moderate-to-severe GL, according to routine clinical practice. Subjects completed a satisfaction questionnaire at 3 weeks (± 7 days) after each cycle. Primary endpoint included subjects' overall satisfaction with GL after three injection cycles. Secondary endpoints included satisfaction after Cycles 1 and 2 and factors associated with satisfaction after each cycle. Physician satisfaction was also assessed after Cycles 1 and 3. RESULTS: Of 150 subjects enrolled, 135 completed the overall subject satisfaction questionnaire after Cycle 3. At 3 weeks after Cycle 3, 99.3% of subjects were 'very satisfied' (74.1%) or 'satisfied' (25.2%) with GL. Levels of subject satisfaction and associated factors after Cycles 1 and 2 were as large and significant as after Cycle 3 (83-100%, depending on question). Physicians' satisfaction with GL appearance, facial expression, and overall satisfaction was almost complete after the first injection (≥ 97.4%) and unanimous after the third (100%). CONCLUSIONS: In the APPEAL study, overall satisfaction was high after three abobotulinumtoxinA injection cycles for GL based on both subjects' (99.3%) and physicians' (100.0%) assessments. High levels of subject satisfaction reported after Cycle 1 were maintained with repeated injections. No new safety signals were observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . Trial registration NCT02353897.

Adverse Events of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) is a medical product that is used widely in cosmetics, and concern over the safety profile has increased among injectors and patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to enhance the statistical effect size using a meta-analysis to detect the incidence rate of adverse events (AEs) in the treatment of facial wrinkles. METHODS: A systematic search was performed for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials published through July 2015. RESULTS: We searched 16 trials, including 42,405 individual participants, and found that in all enrolled facial rejuvenation studies, patients in the BTX-A group had significantly more AEs than those patients in the placebo group (RR = 1.24; 95 % CI 1.07-1.43; p = 0.003). For crow's feet lines injection analysis, the BTX-A group did not exhibit any significant increase in AEs compared with the control group (RR = 1.19; 95 % CI 0.96-1.48; p = 0.12), except in injection site hematoma (RR = 2.14; 95 % CI 1.13-4.07; p = 0.02) in the treatment group. For frown wrinkle injection analysis, AEs were significantly observed in the BTX-A group (RR = 1.47; 95 % CI 1.23-1.77; p < 0.0001), particularly headaches (RR = 1.53; 95 % CI 1.15-2.03; p = 0.003), eyelid ptosis (RR = 5.56; 95 % CI 1.68-18.38; p = 0.005), and heavy eyelids (RR = 6.94; 95 % CI 1.27-37.93; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed the safety profile of BTX-A for glabellar and crow's feet lines, and BTX-A usage for the removal of upper facial wrinkles, which have some significant mild-to-moderate adverse profiles, including headache, eye disorder, eyelid ptosis, and heavy eyelids. Facial injectors should abide by the technical standards of neurotoxic drugs and be familiar with the local pharmacological effects to lessen the severe side effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the A5 online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

DaxibotulinumtoxinA for injection to treat moderate or severe glabellar lines: A randomized, multicenter, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in China.

BACKGROUND: DaxibotulinumtoxinA for injection (DAXI), a novel botulinum toxin type A formulation, is FDA-approved for glabellar lines treatment. Its clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in two Phase III trials (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate DAXI efficacy and safety in Chinese adults with moderate/severe glabellar lines. METHODS: In this Phase III, randomized (2:1), double-blind trial, Chinese adults with moderate/severe glabellar lines received 40 U DAXI or placebo into the corrugator muscles bilaterally and the procerus. Glabellar line severity was evaluated by investigators (Investigator Global Assessment-Frown Wrinkle Severity [IGA-FWS] scale) and participants (Patient Frown Wrinkle Severity [PFWS] scale) for ≥24 to 36 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of 2-point composite responders achieving ≥2-point reduction in IGA-FWS and PFWS scores at week 4 post-treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 307 participants received treatment (DAXI, 205; placebo, 102). A significantly greater proportion of participants in the DAXI arm vs the placebo arm achieved a 2-point composite response at week 4: 125 (61.0%) vs 1 (1.0%); difference, 60.0% [95% CI 49.40-66.46]; 2-sided p < 0.0001). At week 4, 94.1% of the DAXI-treated participants achieved an IGA-FWS score 0/1 (none/mild) and 86.3% achieved PFWS 0/1; median time to loss of none/mild on IGA-FWS and PFWS was 23.9 weeks. The benefits of DAXI over placebo through week 24 occurred regardless of the baseline IGA-FWS score, prior botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) exposure, sex or age. DAXI was well tolerated with no new safety signals. CONCLUSION: DAXI provided durable efficacy and acceptable safety for treating moderate/severe glabellar lines in Chinese participants.

Combining red photobiomodulation therapy with polydioxanone threads for wrinkle reduction in the glabella region: A randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

The combination of polydioxanone (PDO) threads with other technologies has garnered significant interest for rejuvenation purposes. Photobiomodulation (PBM) has the potential to improve patient comfort and recovery after minimally invasive rejuvenation protocols and also contribute to the overall efficacy of these procedures, fostering an integrative approach to cutaneous rejuvenation. The objective os this work was to investigate concurrent application of PDO threads and red LED PBM on glabellar static wrinkles, in a parallel randomized sham-controlled trial. Forty individuals with Glogau aging classification levels 3 and 4, static glabellar wrinkles, and no significant comorbidities received PDO threads applied along glabellar line. Effective PBM group received 1.35 J and 630 nm red LED light punctually along threads, twice weekly for nine sessions over 30 days. The outcome measures were swelling assessment, dermal thickness and PDO thread degradation via linear ultrasound. No swelling was detected 24 h post-PDO thread application, hindering PBM effect assessment. PDO threads induced dermal thickening; no added effect with PBM. No significant difference in thread hydrolysis between groups, though some ultrasound records inconclusive on thread presence. The absence of swelling may stem from various factors, including the timing of post-procedure swelling assessment, operator proficiency in thread application, and procedural characteristics. No evidence supports the notion that PBM augments dermal thickening, however other light parameters should be studied. Insufficient data to demonstrate PBM's effectiveness in controlling post-procedure swelling. Combination of PBM with PDO thread application doesn't enhance dermal thickening, nor accelerate thread degradation at the parameters used here.

Ready-to-use abobotulinumtoxinA solution versus powder botulinumtoxinA for treatment of glabellar lines: Investigators' and subjects' experience in a Phase IV study.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is well-established for treatment of glabellar lines (GLs), and mostly formulated as powders requiring reconstitution for injection. The approved liquid formulation, ready-to-use (RTU) abobotulinumtoxinA was developed to ease injection procedures and prevent reconstitution errors. This multicenter, open-label, Phase IV study evaluated GL treatment experience using RTU abobotulinumtoxinA versus powder BoNT-A (onabotulinumtoxinA). METHODS: Females with experience of BoNT-A facial treatment were randomized 2:1 to GL treatment with 50 U RTU abobotulinumtoxinA (N = 99) or 20 U powder BoNT-A (N = 51) and followed-up for 6 months or 1 month, respectively. Assessments included: time to prepare each product for injection (primary endpoint); investigators' experience with product preparation/reconstitution; investigators' and subjects' treatment experience; safety; and for the RTU product: aesthetic improvement of GLs; subject satisfaction. RESULTS: Compared with powder BoNT-A, RTU abobotulinumtoxinA required statistically significantly less preparation time (mean 0:33 vs. 1:34 min: s; p < 0.0001). Investigators preferred RTU abobotulinumtoxinA over powder BoNT-A (81% of treatment sessions) and found it allowed more time to communicate with subjects (97%). All investigators (100%) also found it easy-to-use, easy-to-learn, and that it fulfilled their expectations. Subjects found the RTU abobotulinumtoxinA treatment comfortable (91%), and through 6 months posttreatment, most reported satisfaction with their appearance (≥88%), looking natural (≥95%) and refreshed (≥80%). At Month 1, 99% of RTU-treated subjects had investigator-assessed improved aesthetic appearance in GLs, maintained in 76% at Month 6. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: RTU abobotulinumtoxinA for GL treatment is well-tolerated, efficacious, shows high levels of subject satisfaction throughout 6 months, saves time, and is preferred by clinicians over powder BoNT-A. GOV REGISTRY: NCT05277337.

Long-term safety and efficacy of MBA-P01 for the treatment of glabellar lines: results from a multicenter, repeated-dose, open-label extension study.

Purpose Following the introduction of new type of botulinum toxin (MBA-P01), a recent phase 3 study demonstrated that MBA-P01 showed comparable efficacy and safety to onabotulinumtoxin A for reducing glabellar lines. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety of repeated MBA-P01 administration for the treatment of glabellar lines.Materials and methods This multicenter, single-group, repeated-dose, long-term open-label extension study evaluated repeated treatment with MBA-P01 (20 U, five treatments over 16 months), with posttreatment evaluation performed up to 52 weeks.Results Based on the safety assessment results, no specific irreversible adverse reactions were associated with the safety profile of MBA-P01. Repeated treatment with MBA-P01 was effective for a treatment duration of 3-5 months.Conclusion In conclusion, multiple cycles of treatment of glabellar lines with MBA-P01 at a dose of 20 U were well tolerated.Clinical trial registration information: This study is registered in ClincalTrials.gov (NCT05321979).

The South American Glabellar Experience Study (SAGE): a multicenter retrospective analysis of real-world treatment patterns following the introduction of incobotulinumtoxinA in Argentina.

BACKGROUND: IncobotulinumtoxinA was approved in Argentina in 2007 for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines. OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluate real-world changes in facial aesthetic treatment patterns and patient satisfaction following the introduction of incobotulinumtoxinA in Argentina. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective chart review conducted in Argentina included women who had received at least 2 treatment cycles of onabotulinumtoxinA (Allergan, Irvine, California) for glabellar lines (period 1) prior to switching to incobotulinumtoxinA (Merz Pharma, GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany (period 2). Subjects were given the option to continue with incobotulinumtoxinA treatments (captured in period 2) or switch back to onabotulinumtoxinA (documented as period 3). Medical records were reviewed for demographics, dosing, reason for switching between products, treatment satisfaction, and interval between injection cycles. RESULTS: One hundred ten women were enrolled and collectively received 662 treatment cycles with botulinum toxin. Subjects were switched to incobotulinumtoxinA at unit doses that were numerically and statistically similar to the onabotulinumtoxinA doses they received in period 1. Most subjects (92%) initially switched to incobotulinumtoxinA because of lower cost. Ninety-two subjects (84%) switched back to onabotulinumtoxinA in period 3, most commonly due to insufficient duration of effect with incobotulinumtoxinA (61/92; 66%). Subjects reported satisfaction with treatment in >90% of their onabotulinumtoxinA visits and in 34% of their incobotulinumtoxinA visits. Median interinjection intervals with onabotulinumtoxinA were 180.3 days (period 1) and 176.9 days (period 3) and 144.3 days with incobotulinumtoxinA in period 2. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world setting, subjects did not appear to perceive the same facial aesthetic benefits from incobotulinumtoxinA as onabotulinumtoxinA when the products were administered at comparable doses.

DAXI (DaxibotulinumtoxinA) - An Innovative Approach for Frown Lines.

Glabellar frown lines, also known as worry lines, are a common sign of aging. The current treatment option for glabellar lines is subjective and ranges from economical anti-wrinkle creams and skin resurfacing techniques such as microdermabrasion and fillers to highly expensive facelifts. Botox® has been the mainstream treatment for decades, but the suggested time between treatments for most toxins is 12-16 weeks, and evidence shows that patients being treated for glabellar lines want longer-lasting results. Recently, on September 16th, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the development of daxibotulinumtoxinA (DAXI) for injection based on clinical trials (SAKURA 1, 2, and 3). These encouraging findings followed by FDA approval mean that the need for repeated treatments to sustain the desired outcome has decreased. DAXI could be a reliable and secure choice for reducing the appearance of wrinkles on the face caused by muscle activity, and its long duration has the potential to enhance the treatment of both therapeutic and cosmetic disorders.

PrabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of glabellar lines in adults, 65 years of age and older: The fourth in a series of post hoc analyses of the phase III clinical study data.

BACKGROUND: Despite the absence of Phase III clinical trial data to support their use, 3.4% of all neurotoxin treatments performed internationally for esthetic purposes in 2020 were performed in patients 65 years of age and older. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of prabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in the subset of Phase III clinical trial participants who were 65 years of age and older. METHODS: Post hoc analyses were performed on all patients who had been treated with a single dose of 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA in the three 150-day, placebo-controlled Phase III glabellar line clinical studies. Patients were grouped by age: ≥65 years (n = 70) versus <65 years (n = 667). The endpoints of primary interest were the proportion of responders with a ≥1-point improvement from baseline at maximum frown on the 4-point Glabellar Line Scale and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: For the efficacy endpoint of primary interest, responder rates among patients 65 years of age and older were numerically less than those of patients less than 65 years by an absolute mean difference of just -2.7% across all visits; none of the differences at any visit were statistically significant. The most common treatment-related adverse event was headache, occurring in 5.7% of those 65 years of age and older and in 9.7% of those less than 65 years. CONCLUSIONS: 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA administered for the treatment of glabellar lines was efficacious in patients 65 years of age and older; it was also well tolerated by this cohort.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a biosimilar abobotulinum toxin type A in treating moderate-to-severe glabellar lines: A non-inferiority double blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Injection of botulinum toxin for cosmetic purposes is a well-established practice. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of Dyston® (investigational biosimilar abobotulinumtoxinA) with Dysport® (abobotulinumtoxinA, Ipsen) in the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. METHODS: Out of 193 screened subjects, 126 volunteers with moderate-to-severe glabellar lines fulfilling eligibility criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either an intramuscular injection of 40-60 units of Dyston® or Dysport® . The primary objective was to test the non-inferiority of Dyston® compared with Dysport® as measured by the percentage of volunteers who achieved no or mild glabellar lines at maximum frown assessed by the physicians based on the Glabellar Line Severity Score (GLSS) at Day 30. Secondary endpoints included the improvement in the glabellar lines at maximum frown and rest states at Days 14, 60, 90, and 120 as well as the side effects of the treatment. RESULTS: Response rates at maximum frown were 75.44% (43/57) in the Dyston® group and 76.67% (46/60) in the Dysport® group on Day 30 (p value: 0.88, 95% CI: -14.24 to 16.70, diff: 1.23) as per-protocol set, and were 75.81% (47/62) and 76.19 (48/63) (p value: 0.96, 95% CI: -14.59 to 15.35, diff: 0.3) in the Dyston® and the Dysport® groups, respectively, based on modified intention to treat population. Adverse events were similar in both groups and mostly mild and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines with Dyston® was effective, tolerable, and non-inferior compared with Dysport® .

Subject satisfaction and psychological well-being with escalating abobotulinumtoxinA injection dose for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that the efficacy and durability of a single AbobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) treatment for moderate to severe glabellar lines may be enhanced with increasing dose, while safety outcomes remain consistent with those of the licensed dose (50 U). AIMS: Evaluation of subject-reported indicators of treatment efficacy, satisfaction, and psychological well-being with ABO dose escalation. METHODS: A Phase 2, 36-week, multicenter, randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in adults with moderate to severe glabellar lines. Subjects received a single ABO treatment, dosed at 50, 75, 100, or 125 U, or placebo. Efficacy endpoints comprised subject-assessed improvement in line severity of ≥1-grade from baseline at maximum frown, global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) grade, FACE-Q™ appraisal of lines, psychological well-being and age, and subject satisfaction. RESULTS: The study included 399 subjects (88.2% were female). Respective responder rates (≥1-grade improvement) with ABO 50-125 U doses ranged between 96.3%-100% at Week 4, 65.0%-67.9% at Week 24, and 33.8%-44.4% at Week 36. GAIS responder rate and FACE-Q appraisal of lines showed a similar pattern of change. Satisfaction was high and psychological well-being was improved from Week 4 through Week 36, with natural, youthful, and refreshed appearance reported for all ABO doses. CONCLUSIONS: A single ABO treatment (dosed at 50-125 U) provided significant and sustained improvements in glabellar line severity over durations up to 36 weeks, versus placebo. Treatment satisfaction was high with all doses. Participants reported natural and youthful appearance, alongside improvements in psychological well-being.

Evaluating the Effect of Incobotulinumtoxin A for Glabellar, Forehead, and Crow's Feet Lines Using A High Dilution.

BACKGROUND: As aesthetic preferences have evolved and patients wish their muscles to be relaxed, but not frozen, a higher dilution of incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO) has allowed for increased spread using fewer units, yet no studies to date have investigated the efficacy, longevity, and safety of hyperdiluted INCO. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO) in glabellar, forehead, and lateral periorbital lines using a high dilution. METHODS: Subjects with moderate-to-severe upper facial lines at rest according to the Merz Aesthetics Scales™ (Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) received 15U of INCO to the glabellar (n=4 injection sites), 10U to the rest of the forehead (n=10 injection sites), and 5U to the lateral periorbital lines (n=3 injection sites/eye). Primary outcomes were physician- and subject-rated improvement at one month using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and changes in line severity using the Merz Aesthetics Scales™. RESULTS: The study included 15 women aged 35 to 65 years. At one month, physician GAIS scores indicated 91.2% of subjects were very much improved and 8.8% were much improved; 91.5%, 78.0%, and 57.6% of participants remained at least improved at four, five, and six months, respectively. Subject GAIS scores at one month were in agreement with physician scores. At one month, an improvement of at least one point in Merz Aesthetics Scales™ scores in glabellar, forehead, and lateral periorbital lines was reported in 88.9%, 98.3%, and 94.8% of participants, respectively. Subject satisfaction was high throughout the study. No treatment-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Hyperdilute INCO was effective at improving overall appearance and reducing line severity in individuals with moderate-to-severe upper facial lines. Patient satisfaction was maintained up to six months and treatment was well tolerated.