Characterization and Mortality Risk of Impaired Left Ventricular Filling in COPD.

BACKGROUND: In COPD, impaired left ventricular (LV) filling might be associated with coexisting HFpEF or due to reduced pulmonary venous return indicated by small LV size. We investigate the all-cause mortality associated with small LV or HFpEF and clinical features discriminating between both patterns of impaired LV filling. METHODS: We performed transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in patients with stable COPD from the COSYCONET cohort to define small LV as LVEDD below the normal range and HFpEF features according to recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology. We assessed the E/A and E/e' ratios, NT-pro-BNP, hs-Troponin I, FEV1, RV, DLCo, and discriminated patients with small LV from those with HFpEF features or no relevant cardiac dysfunction as per TTE (normalTTE). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality after four and a half year. RESULTS: In 1752 patients with COPD, the frequency of small LV, HFpEF-features, and normalTTE was 8%, 16%, and 45%, respectively. Patients with small LV or HFpEF features had higher all-cause mortality rates than patients with normalTTE, HR: 2.75 (95% CI: [1.54 - 4.89]) and 2.16 (95% CI: [1.30 - 3.61]), respectively. Small LV remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality after adjusting for confounders including exacerbation frequency and measures of RV, DLCo, or FEV1. Compared to normalTTE, patients with small LV had reduced LV filling, as indicated by lowered E/A. Yet in contrast to patients with HFpEF-features, patients with small LV had normal LV filling pressure (E/e') and lower levels of NT-pro-BNP and hs-Troponin I. CONCLUSION: In COPD, both small LV and HFpEF-features are associated with increased all-cause mortality and represent two distinct patterns of impaired LV filling.

Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Kidney and Cardiovascular Function.

SGLT2 inhibitors are antihyperglycemic drugs that protect kidneys and the heart of patients with or without type 2 diabetes and preserved or reduced kidney function from failing. The involved protective mechanisms include blood glucose-dependent and -independent mechanisms: SGLT2 inhibitors prevent both hyper- and hypoglycemia, with expectedly little net effect on HbA1C. Metabolic adaptations to induced urinary glucose loss include reduced fat mass and more ketone bodies as additional fuel. SGLT2 inhibitors lower glomerular capillary hypertension and hyperfiltration, thereby reducing the physical stress on the filtration barrier, albuminuria, and the oxygen demand for tubular reabsorption. This improves cortical oxygenation, which, together with lesser tubular gluco-toxicity, may preserve tubular function and glomerular filtration rate in the long term. SGLT2 inhibitors may mimic systemic hypoxia and stimulate erythropoiesis, which improves organ oxygen delivery. SGLT2 inhibitors are proximal tubule and osmotic diuretics that reduce volume retention and blood pressure and preserve heart function, potentially in part by overcoming the resistance to diuretics and atrial-natriuretic-peptide and inhibiting Na-H exchangers and sympathetic tone.

Elevated ITGA1 levels in type 2 diabetes: implications for cardiac function impairment.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is known to contribute to the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, identifying HFpEF in individuals with type 2 diabetes early on is often challenging due to a limited array of biomarkers. This study aims to investigate specific biomarkers associated with the progression of HFpEF in individuals with type 2 diabetes, for the purpose of enabling early detection and more effective management strategies. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from individuals with type 2 diabetes, both with and without HFpEF, for proteomic analysis. Plasma integrin α1 (ITGA1) levels were measured and compared between the two groups. Participants were further categorised based on ITGA1 levels and underwent detailed transthoracic echocardiography at baseline and during a median follow-up period of 30 months. Multivariable linear and Cox regression analyses were conducted separately to assess the associations between plasma ITGA1 levels and changes in echocardiography indicators and re-hospitalisation risk. Additionally, proteomic data for the individuals' left ventricles, from ProteomeXchange database, were analysed to uncover mechanisms underlying the change in ITGA1 levels in HFpEF. RESULTS: Individuals with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF showed significantly higher plasma ITGA1 levels than the individuals with type 2 diabetes without HFpEF. These elevated ITGA1 levels were associated with left ventricular remodelling and impaired diastolic function. Furthermore, during a median follow-up of 30 months, multivariable analysis revealed that elevated ITGA1 levels independently correlated with deterioration of both diastolic and systolic cardiac functions. Additionally, higher baseline plasma ITGA1 levels independently predicted re-hospitalisation risk (HR 2.331 [95% CI 1.387, 3.917], p=0.001). Proteomic analysis of left ventricular myocardial tissue provided insights into the impact of increased ITGA1 levels on cardiac fibrosis-related pathways and the contribution made by these changes to the development and progression of HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: ITGA1 serves as a biomarker for monitoring cardiac structural and functional damage, can be used to accurately diagnose the presence of HFpEF, and can be used to predict potential deterioration in cardiac structure and function as well as re-hospitalisation for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Its measurement holds promise for facilitating risk stratification and early intervention to mitigate the adverse cardiovascular effects associated with diabetes. DATA AVAILABILITY: The proteomic data of left ventricular myocardial tissue from individuals with type 2 diabetes, encompassing both those with and without HFpEF, is available from the ProteomeXchange database at http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org .

Integrated proteomic and metabolomic profiling reveals novel insights on the inflammation and immune response in HFpEF.

BACKGROUND: The precise mechanisms leading to the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remain incompletely defined. In this study, an integrative approach utilizing untargeted proteomics and metabolomics was employed to delineate the altered proteomic and metabolomic profiles in patients with HFpEF compared to healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from a prospective cohort consisting of 30 HFpEF participants and 30 healthy controls, matched by gender and age. plasma samples were analyzed by multi-omics platforms. The quantification of plasma proteins and metabolites was performed using data-independent acquisition-based liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS), respectively. Additionally, Proteomic and metabolomic results were analyzed separately and integrated using correlation and pathway analysis. This was followed by the execution of Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment studies to elucidate the biological relevance of the observed results. RESULTS: A total of 46 significantly differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) and 102 differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) were identified. Then, GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed by DEPs and DEMs. Integrated analysis of proteomics and metabolomics has revealed Tuberculosis and African trypanosomiasis pathways that are significantly enriched and the DEPs and DEMs enriched within them, are associated with inflammation and immune response. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated proteomic and metabolomic analyses revealed distinct inflammatory and immune response pathways in HFpEF, highlighting novel therapeutic avenues.

Novel insights into the pathobiology of pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH) worldwide and is strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The American Heart Association recently highlighted a call to action regarding the distinct lack of evidence-based treatments for PH due to poorly understood pathophysiology of PH attributable to HFpEF (PH-HFpEF). Prior studies have described cardiophysiological mechanisms to explain the development of isolated postcapillary PH (ipc-PH); however, the consequent increase in pulmonary vascular (PV) resistance (PVR) may lead to the less understood and more fatal combined pre- and postcapillary PH (cpc-PH). Metabolic disease and inflammatory dysregulation have been suggested to predispose PH, yet the molecular mechanisms are unknown. Although PH-HFpEF has been studied to partly share vasoactive neurohormonal mediators with primary pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), clinical trials that have targeted these pathways have been unsuccessful. The increased mortality of patients with PH-HFpEF necessitates further study into viable mechanistic targets involved in disease progression. We aim to summarize the current pathophysiological and clinical understanding of PH-HFpEF, highlight the role of known molecular mechanisms in the progression of PV disease, and introduce a novel concept that lipid metabolism may be attenuating and propagating PH-HFpEF.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our review addresses pulmonary hypertension (PH) attributable to heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; PH-HFpEF). Current knowledge gaps in PH-HFpEF pathophysiology have led to a lack of therapeutic targets. Thus, we address identified knowledge gaps in a comprehensive review, focusing on current clinical epidemiology, known pathophysiology, and previously studied molecular mechanisms. We also introduce a comprehensive review of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) lipid inflammatory mediators in PH-HFpEF.

Long-term Changes in Body Composition and Exercise Capacity Following Calorie Restriction and Exercise Training in Older Patients with Obesity and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Obesity with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the dominant form of HF among older persons. In a randomized trial, we previously showed that a 5-month calorie restriction (CR) program, with or without aerobic exercise training (AT), resulted in significant weight and fat loss and improved exercise capacity. However, little is known regarding the long-term effects of these outcomes after a short-term (5-month) intervention of CR with or without AT in older patients with obesity and HFpEF. METHODS: Sixteen participants from either the CR or CR+AT who experienced significant weight loss ≥2 kg were reexamined after a long-term follow-up endpoint (28.0±10.8 months) without intervention. The follow-up assessment included body weight and composition via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and exhaustive cardiopulmonary treadmill exercise testing. RESULTS: Compared to the 5-month time point intervention endpoint, at the long-term follow-up endpoint, mean body weight increased +5.2±4.0 kg (90.7±11.2kg versus 95.9±11.9, p<0.001) due to increased fat mass (38.9± 9.3 versus 43.8 ± 9.8, p<0.001) with no change in lean mass (49.6±7.1 versus 49.9±7.6, p=0.67), resulting in worse body composition (decreased lean-to-fat mass). Change in total mass was strongly and significantly correlated with change in fat mass (r=0.75, p<0.001), whereas there appeared to be a weaker correlation with change in lean mass (r=0.50, p=0.051). Additionally, from the end of the 5-month time point intervention endpoint to the long-term follow-up endpoint, there were large, significant decreases in VO2peak (-2.2± 2.1ml/kg/min, p=0.003) and exercise time (-2.4±2.6min, p=0.006). There appeared to be an inverse correlation between the change in VO2peak and the change in fat mass (r=-0.52, p=0.062). CONCLUSION: Although CR and CR+AT in older patients with obesity and HFpEF can significantly improve body composition and exercise capacity, these positive changes diminish considerably during long-term follow-up endpoint, and regained weight is predominantly adipose, resulting in worsened overall body composition compared to baseline. This suggests a need for long-term adherence strategies to prevent weight regain and maintain improvements in body composition and exercise capacity following CR in older patients with obesity and HFpEF.

Does Heterogeneity Exist in Treatment Associations With Renin-Angiotensin-System Inhibitors or Beta-blockers According to Phenotype Clusters in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction?

BACKGROUND: We explored the association between use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and beta-blockers, with mortality/morbidity in 5 previously identified clusters of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 20,980 patients with HFpEF from the Swedish HF registry, phenotyped into young-low comorbidity burden (12%), atrial fibrillation-hypertensive (32%), older-atrial fibrillation (24%), obese-diabetic (15%), and a cardiorenal cluster (17%). In Cox proportional hazard models with inverse probability weighting, there was no heterogeneity in the association between renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use and cluster membership for any of the outcomes: cardiovascular (CV) mortality, all-cause mortality, HF hospitalisation, CV hospitalisation, or non-CV hospitalisation. In contrast, we found a statistical interaction between beta-blocker use and cluster membership for all-cause mortality (P = .03) and non-CV hospitalisation (P = .001). In the young-low comorbidity burden and atrial fibrillation-hypertensive cluster, beta-blocker use was associated with statistically significant lower all-cause mortality and non-CV hospitalisation and in the obese-diabetic cluster beta-blocker use was only associated with a statistically significant lower non-CV hospitalisation. The interaction between beta-blocker use and cluster membership for all-cause mortality could potentially be driven by patients with improved EF. However, patient numbers were diminished when excluding those with improved EF and the direction of the associations remained similar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFpEF, the association with all-cause mortality and non-CV hospitalisation was heterogeneous across clusters for beta-blockers. It remains to be elucidated how heterogeneity in HFpEF could influence personalized medicine and future clinical trial design.

Heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction: A review of disease burden and remaining unmet medical needs within a new treatment landscape.

This review provides a comprehensive overview of heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF), including its definition, diagnosis, and epidemiology; clinical, humanistic, and economic burdens; current pharmacologic landscape in key pharmaceutical markets; and unmet needs to identify key knowledge gaps. We conducted a targeted literature review in electronic databases and prioritized articles with valuable insights into HFmrEF/HFpEF. Overall, 27 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 66 real-world evidence studies, 18 clinical practice guidelines, and 25 additional publications were included. Although recent heart failure (HF) guidelines set left ventricular ejection fraction thresholds to differentiate categories, characterization and diagnosis criteria vary because of the incomplete disease understanding. Recent epidemiological data are limited and diverse. Approximately 50% of symptomatic HF patients have HFpEF, more common than HFmrEF. Prevalence varies with country because of differing definitions and study characteristics, making prevalence interpretation challenging. HFmrEF/HFpEF has considerable mortality risk, and the mortality rate varies with study and patient characteristics and treatments. HFmrEF/HFpEF is associated with considerable morbidity, poor patient outcomes, and common comorbidities. Patients require frequent hospitalizations; therefore, early intervention is crucial to prevent disease burden. Recent RCTs show promising results like risk reduction of composite cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Costs data are scarce, but the economic burden is increasing. Despite new drugs, unmet medical needs requiring new treatments remain. Thus, HFmrEF/HFpEF is a growing global healthcare concern. With improving yet incomplete understanding of this disease and its promising treatments, further research is required for better patient outcomes.

Interplay of the heart, spleen, and bone marrow in heart failure: the role of splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis.

Improvements in therapies for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are crucial for improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Although HFpEF is the predominant heart failure type among older individuals, its prognosis is often poor owing to the lack of effective therapies. The roles of the spleen and bone marrow are often overlooked in the context of HFpEF. Recent studies suggest that the spleen and bone marrow could play key roles in HFpEF, especially in relation to inflammation and immune responses. The bone marrow can increase production of certain immune cells that can migrate to the heart and contribute to disease. The spleen can contribute to immune responses that either protect or exacerbate heart failure. Extramedullary hematopoiesis in the spleen could play a crucial role in HFpEF. Increased metabolic activity in the spleen, immune cell production and mobilization to the heart, and concomitant cytokine production may occur in heart failure. This leads to systemic chronic inflammation, along with an imbalance of immune cells (macrophages) in the heart, resulting in chronic inflammation and progressive fibrosis, potentially leading to decreased cardiac function. The bone marrow and spleen are involved in altered iron metabolism and anemia, which also contribute to HFpEF. This review presents the concept of an interplay between the heart, spleen, and bone marrow in the setting of HFpEF, with a particular focus on extramedullary hematopoiesis in the spleen. The aim of this review is to discern whether the spleen can serve as a new therapeutic target for HFpEF.

Large animal models to study effectiveness of therapy devices in the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Our understanding of the complex pathophysiology of Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is limited by the lack of a robust in vivo model. Existing in-vivo models attempt to reproduce the four main phenotypes of HFpEF; ageing, obesity, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. To date, there is no in vivo model that represents all the haemodynamic characteristics of HFpEF, and only a few have proven to be reliable for the preclinical evaluation of potentially new therapeutic targets. HFpEF accounts for 50% of all the heart failure cases and its incidence is on the rise, posing a huge economic burden on the health system. Patients with HFpEF have limited therapeutic options available. The inadequate effectiveness of current pharmaceutical therapeutics for HFpEF has prompted the development of device-based treatments that target the hemodynamic changes to reduce the symptoms of HFpEF. However, despite the potential of device-based solutions to treat HFpEF, most of these therapies are still in the developmental stage and a relevant HFpEF in vivo model will surely expedite their development process. This review article outlines the major limitations of the current large in-vivo models in use while discussing how these designs have helped in the development of therapy devices for the treatment of HFpEF.

Sex-specific differences in risk factors, comorbidities, diagnostic challenges, optimal management, and prognostic outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A comprehensive literature review.

Due to hormonal variations, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains prevalent in women and affects almost half of the heart failure (HF) patients. Given the yearly death rate of 10-30% and the unavailability of medications targeting HFpEF, the need arises for a better understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of this syndrome. This comprehensive review explores sex-specific differences in traditional risk factors; female-specific factors that may impact HFpEF development and response to therapy, including variations in hormone levels that may occur pre- and post-menopausal or during pregnancy; and disparities in comorbidities, clinical presentation, and diagnostic challenges. Lastly, the review addresses prognostic outcomes, noting that women with HFpEF have a poor quality of life but a higher survival rate. It also discusses novel biomarkers and precision medicine, emphasizing their potential to improve early detection and personalized treatment.

Anti-bradycardia pacing-impact on patients with HFpEF: a systematic review.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has become an emerging concern. The protective effect of bradycardia in patients with reduced ejection fraction using beta-blockers or ivabradine does not improve symptoms in HFpEF. This review aims to assess current data regarding the impact of anti-bradycardia pacing in patients with HFpEF. A search was conducted on PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Wiley Online Library, selecting studies from 2013 to 2023. Relevant and eligible prospective studies and randomized controlled trials were included. Functional status, quality of life, and echocardiographic parameters were assessed. Six studies conformed to the selection criteria. Four were prospective studies with a total of 90 patients analyzed. Two were randomized controlled trials with a total of 129 patients assessed. The 6-min walk test (6MWT) and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score improved in all prospective studies. My-PACE trial showed improvements in MLHFQ score (p < 0.001), significant relative lowering in NT-proBNP levels (p = 0.02), and an increased mean daily activity in the personalized accelerated pacing group compared to usual care. RAPID-HF trial proved that pacemaker implantation to enhance exercise heart rate (HR) did not improve exercise capacity and was associated with increased adverse events. HFpEF requires a more individualized approach and quality of life management. This review demonstrates that higher resting HR by atrial pacing may improve symptoms and even outcomes in HFpEF, while a higher adaptive rate during exertion has not been proven beneficial.

Adverse effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sodium-glucose cotransoporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2Is) improve prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients both with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, these drugs can have some side effects. To estimate the relative risk of side effects in HF patients treated with SGLT-2Is irrespective from left ventricular EF and setting (chronic and non-chronic HF). Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling patients with HFrEF, 4 RCTs enrolling non-chronic HF, and 3 RCTs enrolling HFpEF were included. Among side effects, urinary infection, genital infection, acute kidney injury, diabetic ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, bone fractures, and amputations were considered in the analysis. Overall, 24,055 patients were included in the analysis: 9020 (38%) patients with HFrEF, 12,562 (52%) with HFpEF, and 2473 (10%) with non-chronic HF. There were no differences between SGLT-2Is and placebo in the risk to develop diabetic ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, bone fractures, and amputations. HFrEF patients treated with SGLT-2Is had a significant reduction of acute kidney injury (RR = 0.54 (95% CI 0.33-0.87), p = 0.011), whereas no differences have been reported in the HFpEF group (RR = 0.94 (95% CI 0.83-1.07), p = 0.348) and non-chronic HF setting (RR = 0.79 (95% CI 0.55-1.15), p = 0.214). A higher risk to develop genital infection (overall 2.57 (95% CI 1.82-3.63), p < 0.001) was found among patients treated with SGLT-2Is irrespective from EF (HFrEF: RR = 1.96 (95% CI 1.17-3.29), p = 0.011; HFpEF: RR = 3.04 (95% CI 1.88-4.90), p < 0.001). The risk to develop urinary infections was increased among SGLT-2I users in the overall population (RR = 1.13 (95% CI 1.00-1.28), p = 0.046) and in the HFpEF setting (RR = 1.19 (95% CI 1.02-1.38), p = 0.029), whereas no differences have been reported in HFrEF (RR = 1.05 (95% CI 0.81-1.36), p = 0.725) and in non-chronic HF setting (RR = 1.04 (95% CI 0.75-1.46), p = 0.806). SGLT-2Is increase the risk of urinary and genital infections in HF patients. In HFpEF patients, the treatment increases the risk of urinary infections compared to placebo, whereas SGLT-2Is reduce the risk of acute kidney disease in patients with HFrEF.

The prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To date, studies on the prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have not been summarized and analyzed as a whole. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF. The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched from dates of inception until May 1, 2023. The primary outcome was the prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF, and values of CMD prevalence were pooled using a random-effects model. In total, 10 studies involving 1267 patients, including 822 with HFpEF and 445 without HFpEF, were included. The pooled prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF was 71% (95% CI, 0.63-0.79). In the subgroup analysis, the prevalence of CMD was 79% (95% CI, 0.71-0.87) by invasive measurement and 66% (95% CI, 0.54-0.77) by noninvasive measurement and 67% (95% CI, 0.52-0.82) with CFR < 2.0 and 75.0% (95% CI, 0.71-0.79) with CFR < 2.5. The prevalence of endothelium-independent CMD and endothelium-dependent CMD was 62% (95% CI, 0.53-0.72) and 50% (95% CI, 0.19-0.81), respectively. The prevalence of CMD was 74% (95% CI = 0.69-0.79) and 66% (95% CI = 0.41-0.90) in prospective and retrospective studies, respectively. Compared with the control group, patients with HFpEF had a significantly lower CFR (MD = - 1.28, 95% CI = - 1.82 to - 0.74, P < 0.01) and a higher prevalence of CMD (RR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.52 to 3.20, P < 0.01). Qualitative analysis demonstrated that CMD might be associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. In conclusion, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting the prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF. Our study demonstrates that CMD is common in patients with HFpEF and might be associated with poor clinical outcomes in these patients. Clinicians should attach importance to CMD in the diagnosis and treatment of HFpEF. The number of studies in this field is relatively small. Therefore, more high-quality studies are needed to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of CMD and the potential role of CMD as a therapeutic target in patients with HFpEF.

Latest pharmaceutical approaches across the spectrum of heart failure.

Despite major advances in prevention and medical therapy, heart failure (HF) remains associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in older and frailer patients. Therefore, a complete, guideline-based treatment is essential, even in HF patients with conditions traditionally associated with a problematic initiation and escalation of the medical HF therapy, such as chronic kidney disease and arterial hypotension, as the potential adverse effects are overcome by the overall decrease of the absolute risk. Furthermore, since the latest data suggest that the benefit of a combined medical therapy (MRA, ARNI, SGLT2i, beta-blocker) may extend up to a LVEF of 65%, further trials on these subgroups of patients (HFmrEF, HFpEF) are needed to re-evaluate the guideline-directed medical therapy across the HF spectrum. In particular, the use of SGLT2i was recently extended to HFpEF patients, as evidenced by the DELIVER and EMPEROR-preserved trials. Moreover, the indication for other conservative treatments in HF patients, such as the intravenous iron supplementation, was accordingly strengthened in the latest guidelines. Finally, the possible implementation of newer substances, such as finerenone, in guideline-directed medical practice for HF is anticipated with great interest.

Device therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Device therapy is a nonpharmacological approach that presents a crucial advancement for managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This review investigated the impact of device-based interventions and emphasized their potential for optimizing treatment for this complex patient demographic. Cardiac resynchronization therapy, augmented by atrioventricular node ablation with His-bundle pacing or left bundle-branch pacing, is effective for enhancing cardiac function and establishing atrioventricular synchrony. Cardiac contractility modulation and vagus nerve stimulation represent novel strategies for increasing myocardial contractility and adjusting the autonomic balance. Left ventricular expanders have demonstrated short-term benefits in HFpEF patients but require more investigation for long-term effectiveness and safety, especially in patients with AF. Research gaps regarding complications arising from left ventricular expander implantation need to be addressed. Device-based therapies for heart valve diseases, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, show promise for patients with AF and HFpEF, particularly those with mitral or tricuspid regurgitation. Clinical evaluations show that these device therapies lessen AF occurrence, improve exercise tolerance, and boost left ventricular diastolic function. However, additional studies are required to perfect patient selection criteria and ascertain the long-term effectiveness and safety of these interventions. Our review underscores the significant potential of device therapy for improving the outcomes and quality of life for patients with AF and HFpEF.

Myocardial transcriptomic analysis of diabetic patients with aortic stenosis: key role for mitochondrial calcium signaling.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a frequent comorbidity encountered in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), leading to an adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and dysfunction. Metabolic alterations have been suggested as contributors of the deleterious effect of T2D on LV remodeling and function in patients with severe AS, but so far, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Mitochondria play a central role in the regulation of cardiac energy metabolism. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the mitochondrial alterations associated with the deleterious effect of T2D on LV remodeling and function in patients with AS, preserved ejection fraction, and no additional heart disease. METHODS: We combined an in-depth clinical, biological and echocardiography phenotype of patients with severe AS, with (n = 34) or without (n = 50) T2D, referred for a valve replacement, with transcriptomic and histological analyses of an intra-operative myocardial LV biopsy. RESULTS: T2D patients had similar AS severity but displayed worse cardiac remodeling, systolic and diastolic function than non-diabetics. RNAseq analysis identified 1029 significantly differentially expressed genes. Functional enrichment analysis revealed several T2D-specific upregulated pathways despite comorbidity adjustment, gathering regulation of inflammation, extracellular matrix organization, endothelial function/angiogenesis, and adaptation to cardiac hypertrophy. Downregulated gene sets independently associated with T2D were related to mitochondrial respiratory chain organization/function and mitochondrial organization. Generation of causal networks suggested a reduced Ca2+ signaling up to the mitochondria, with the measured gene remodeling of the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter in favor of enhanced uptake. Histological analyses supported a greater cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and a decreased proximity between the mitochondrial VDAC porin and the reticular IP3-receptor in T2D. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support a crucial role for mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling in T2D-induced cardiac dysfunction in severe AS patients, from a structural reticulum-mitochondria Ca2+ uncoupling to a mitochondrial gene remodeling. Thus, our findings open a new therapeutic avenue to be tested in animal models and further human cardiac biopsies in order to propose new treatments for T2D patients suffering from AS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT01862237.

Recent advances in mechanistic studies of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and its comorbidities-Role of microRNAs.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a multifaceted syndrome with a complex aetiology commonly associated with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension and renal disease. Various diseases induce systemic, chronic and low-grade inflammation; microvascular dysfunction; metabolic stress; tissue ischemia; and fibrosis, leading to HFpEF. An effective treatment for HFpEF is lacking, largely owing to its pathophysiological heterogeneity. Recent studies have revealed that microRNAs (miRNAs) play crucial roles in regulating the pathogenesis of HFpEF and its comorbidities. METHODS: This narrative review included original articles and reviews published over the past 20 years found through 'PubMed' and 'Web of Science'. The search terms included "HFpEF," "MicroRNAs," "comorbidities," "Microvascular Dysfunction (MVD)," "inflammation," "pathophysiology," "endothelial dysfunction," "energy metabolism abnormalities" "cardiac fibrosis" and "treatment." RESULTS: Inflammation, MVD, abnormal energy metabolism, myocardial hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis are important pathophysiological mechanisms underlying HFpEF. As gene expression regulators, miRNAs may contribute to the pathophysiology of HFpEF and are expected to serve in the stratification of patients with HFpEF and as prognostic indicators for monitoring treatment responses. CONCLUSIONS: A customized strategy based on miRNAs has emerged as an effective treatment for HFpEF. In this review, we discuss recent research surrounding miRNAs and HFpEF and propose potential miRNA targets for the pathophysiology of HFpEF and its comorbidities. Although current research concerning miRNAs and their therapeutic potential is in its early stages, miRNA-based diagnostics and therapeutics hold great promise in the future.

SIRT6 Mitigates Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a growing health problem without effective therapies. Epidemiological studies indicate that diabetes is a strong risk factor for HFpEF, and about 45% of patients with HFpEF are suffering from diabetes, yet the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. METHODS: Using a combination of echocardiography, hemodynamics, RNA-sequencing, molecular biology, in vitro and in vivo approaches, we investigated the roles of SIRT6 (sirtuin 6) in regulation of endothelial fatty acid (FA) transport and HFpEF in diabetes. RESULTS: We first observed that endothelial SIRT6 expression was markedly diminished in cardiac tissues from heart failure patients with diabetes. We then established an experimental mouse model of HFpEF in diabetes induced by a combination of the long-term high-fat diet feeding and a low-dose streptozocin challenge. We also generated a unique humanized SIRT6 transgenic mouse model, in which a single copy of human SIRT6 transgene was engineered at mouse Rosa26 locus and conditionally induced with the Cre-loxP technology. We found that genetically restoring endothelial SIRT6 expression in the diabetic mice ameliorated diastolic dysfunction concurrently with decreased cardiac lipid accumulation. SIRT6 gain- or loss-of-function studies showed that SIRT6 downregulated endothelial FA uptake. Mechanistically, SIRT6 suppressed endothelial expression of PPARγ through SIRT6-dependent deacetylation of histone H3 lysine 9 around PPARγ promoter region; and PPARγ reduction mediated SIRT6-dependent inhibition of endothelial FA uptake. Importantly, oral administration of small molecule SIRT6 activator MDL-800 to diabetic mice mitigated cardiac lipid accumulation and diastolic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The impairment of endothelial SIRT6 expression links diabetes to HFpEF through the alteration of FA transport across the endothelial barrier. Genetic and pharmacological strategies that restored endothelial SIRT6 function in mice with diabetes alleviated experimental HFpEF by limiting FA uptake and improving cardiac metabolism, thus warranting further clinical evaluation.

Rest and exercise-stress estimated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure using real-time free-breathing cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Identification of increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) by right heart catheterization (RHC) is the reference standard for the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging estimation of PCWP at rest was introduced as a non-invasive alternative. Since many patients are only identified during physiological exercise-stress, we hypothesized that novel exercise-stress CMR-derived PCWP emerges superior compared to its assessment at rest. METHODS: The HFpEF-Stress Trial prospectively recruited 75 patients with exertional dyspnea and diastolic dysfunction who then underwent rest and exercise-stress RHC and CMR. HFpEF was defined according to PCWP (overt HFpEF ≥15 mmHg at rest, masked HFpEF ≥25 mmHg during exercise-stress). CMR-derived PCWP was calculated based on previously published formula using left ventricular mass and either biplane left atrial volume (LAV) or monoplane left atrial area (LAA). RESULTS: LAV (rest/stress: r = 0.50/r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and LAA PCWP (rest/stress: r = 0.50/r = 0.48, p < 0.001) correlated significantly with RHC-derived PCWP while numerically overestimating PCWP at rest and underestimating PCWP during exercise-stress. LAV and LAA PCWP showed good diagnostic accuracy to detect HFpEF (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) LAV rest 0.73, stress 0.81; LAA rest 0.72, stress 0.77) with incremental diagnostic value for the detection of masked HFpEF using exercise-stress (AUC LAV rest 0.54 vs stress 0.67, p = 0.019, LAA rest 0.52 vs stress 0.66, p = 0.012). LAV but not LAA PCWP during exercise-stress was a predictor for 24 months hospitalization independent of a medical history for atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.55, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive PCWP correlates well with the invasive reference at rest and during exercise stress. There is overall good diagnostic accuracy for HFpEF assessment using CMR-derived estimated PCWP despite deviations in absolute agreement. Non-invasive exercise derived PCWP may particularly facilitate detection of masked HFpEF in the future.