Impact of platelet pathogen inactivation on blood component utilization and patient safety in a large Austrian Regional Medical Centre.

BACKGROUND: In clinical studies, pathogen inactivation (PI) of platelet concentrates (PC) with amotosalen and UVA light did not impact patient risk for haemorrhage but may affect transfusion frequency and component utilization. We evaluated the influence of platelet PI on PC, red cell concentrate (RCC) and plasma use and safety in routine practice in a large regional hospital. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Comparative effectiveness of conventional vs. PI-treated PC was analysed during two 21-month periods, before and after PI implementation. RESULTS: Similar numbers of patients were transfused in the pre-PI (control, 1797) and post-PI (test, 1694) periods with comparable numbers of PC (8611 and 7705, respectively). The mean numbers of PC per patient transfused (4·8 vs. 4·5, P = 0·43) were not different but days of PC support (5·9 vs. 5·0, P < 0·01) decreased. Most patients received RCC (86·8% control vs. 84·8% test, P = 0·90) with similar mean numbers transfused (10·8 vs. 10·2 RCC, P = 0·22), and fewer patients (55·4% control vs. 44·7% test, P < 0·01) received less plasma units (mean 9·9 vs. 7·8, respectively, P < 0·01) in the test period. The frequencies of transfusion-related adverse events (AE) were comparable (1·3% vs. 1·4%, P = 0·95). Analysis of haematology-oncology (522 control, 452 test), cardiac surgery (739 control, 711 test), paediatric (157 control, 130 test) and neonate (23 control, 20 test) patients revealed no increase in PC, plasma and RCC utilization, or AE. CONCLUSION: Component utilization and patient safety were not impacted by adoption of PI for PC. RCC use per patient was comparable, suggestive of no increase in significant bleeding.

Patient outcomes and amotosalen/UVA-treated platelet utilization in massively transfused patients.

BACKGROUND: Amotosalen/UVA-treated platelet concentrates (PCs) have demonstrated efficacy for treating and preventing bleeding in clinical trials and in routine use; however, most studies were performed in haematology/oncology patients. We investigated efficacy during massive transfusion (MT) in general hospitalized patients. METHODS: Universal amotosalen/UVA treatment (INTERCEPT Blood System) of platelets was introduced at a large Austrian medical centre. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis comparing component use, in-hospital mortality and length of stay after MT that included platelet transfusion, for two periods (21 months each) before and after implementation. RESULTS: A total of 306 patients had MT. Patients were mostly male (74%) and ≥18 years old (99%), including 93 liver transplant, 97 cardiac or vascular surgery and 51 trauma patients. There were no differences in demographics between the periods. Component use on the day and within 7 days of the MT event was unchanged post-IBS implementation, except trauma patients received fewer RBCs on the day. The mean ratio of RBC:platelets:plasma on the day of the MT was close to 1:1:1 in both periods, except for liver transplants with MT who received more plasma components. Overall, in-hospital mortality (preimplementation = 27·6% vs. postimplementation = 24·0%; P = 0·51) and median time to discharge (preimplementation = 27 vs. postimplementation = 23 days; P = 0·37) did not change, except for cardiac and vascular surgery patients who were discharged earlier. CONCLUSION: The introduction of amotosalen/UVA-treated, pathogen-reduced PC did not adversely affect clinical outcomes in massively transfused patients in terms of blood product usage, in-hospital mortality and length of stay for a range of clinical indications for platelet transfusion support.

Pathogen inactivation efficacy of Mirasol PRT System and Intercept Blood System for non-leucoreduced platelet-rich plasma-derived platelets suspended in plasma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pathogen inactivation (PI) in non-leucoreduced platelet-rich plasma-derived platelets suspended in plasma using the Mirasol PRT System and the Intercept Blood System. METHODS: Platelets were pooled using the Acrodose PL system and separated into two aliquots for Mirasol and Intercept treatment. Four replicates of each viral strain were used for the evaluation. For bacteria, both low-titre (45-152 CFU/unit) inoculation and high-titre (7·34-10·18 log CFU/unit) inoculation with two replicates for each bacterial strain were used. Platelets with non-detectable bacterial growth and platelets inoculated with a low titre were stored for 5 days, and culture was performed with the BacT/ALERT system. RESULTS: The inactivation efficacy expressed as log reduction for Mirasol and Intercept systems for viruses was as follows: human immunodeficiency virus 1, ≥4·19 vs. ≥4·23; bovine viral diarrhoea virus, 1·83 vs. ≥6·03; pseudorabies virus, 2·73 vs. ≥5·20; hepatitis A virus, 0·62 vs. 0·76; and porcine parvovirus, 0·28 vs. 0·38. The inactivation efficacy for bacteria was as follows: Escherichia coli, 5·45 vs. ≥9·22; Staphylococcus aureus, 4·26 vs. ≥10·11; and Bacillus subtilis, 5·09 vs. ≥7·74. Postinactivation bacterial growth in platelets inoculated with a low titre of S. aureus or B. subtilis was detected only with Mirasol. CONCLUSION: Pathogen inactivation efficacy of Intercept for enveloped viruses was found to be satisfactory. Mirasol showed satisfactory inactivation efficacy for HIV-1 only. The two selected non-enveloped viruses were not inactivated by both systems. Inactivation efficacy of Intercept was more robust for all bacteria tested at high or low titres.

Health Economic Aspects of Platelet Concentrates: Comparing Cost and Reimbursement of Pathogen Inactivated and Conventional Platelet Concentrates in a German Comprehensive Cancer Center.

INTRODUCTION: Pathogen inactivation (PI) utilizing amotosalen and UVA light (INTERCEPT® Blood System) is a well-established method for the production of safer platelet concentrates (PCs). While many studies describe clinical and logistical benefits of PI, the implications and potential challenges from a hospital management perspective have not yet been analyzed - health economic analyses considering reimbursement of PI are lacking. The objective of this analysis was to examine the real-life inpatient treatment costs from a hospital perspective and to assess the economic impact of PI-PC versus conventional PC (CONV-PC) administration in Germany. METHODS: Real-life cost data for inpatient cancer cases from 2020 of the University Hospital Cologne were identified by operating and procedure codes. The German diagnosis-related groups, extra fees, case mix index (CMI), length of stay (LOS), and average resource consumption of PC were evaluated from a micro-management perspective. The potential economic impact of implementing PI-treated PCs was modeled retrospectively. RESULTS: In total, 951 inpatient cases were analyzed (CMI [median 4.7-9.9], LOS [median 26 days], number of cases in intensive care units [38%]). The median DRG fee was between EUR 13,800 and EUR 26,400. According to our model, the use of PI-PC compared to CONV-PC would result in savings between EUR 184 and EUR 306 per case. CONCLUSION: From a hospital management perspective, oncological cases requiring PC transfusion are associated with a high CMI (reimbursement per DRG flat fee) and moderate costs with sufficient add-on payment for PI on a case level. Investment and process costs for PI implementation can be analyzed for site-specific scenarios.

Pathogen inactivation/reduction of platelet concentrates: turning theory into practice.

Background Pathogen reduction technology (PRT) has been proven to reduce the residual risk of transmission of infectious agents. Reduction of various contaminating bacteriae, viruses and parasites by few to several log steps and efficiency to prevent GVHD has been shown. Aim To evaluate and compare advantages and disadvantages of PRT available for practical application in platelets. Materials and Methods PRT for the treatment of platelets is currently offered by two formats: Amotosalen (INTERCEPT, Cerus, Concord, CA, USA) and vitamin B2 (Mirasol, Caridian, Denver, USA). Results from different studies and our own experiences with the two techniques are compared and discussed. Results and Discussion For both technologies, different groups of investigators have shown acceptable in-vitro results with respect to functional and storage data for platelets stored for up to 5 days after production and before transfusion. Initial clinical studies showed no inferiority of the treated platelets in comparison to untreated controls in thrombocytopenic patients. However for both techniques a tendency towards lower CCI has been reported, which may be more pronounced in the platelets treated with the Intercept process. For introduction of PRT many countries require not only CE mark but licensing with the respective authorities since treatment for pathogen reduction is regarded as creating a 'new' blood product. With respect to a platelet loss during pathogen reduction it seems recommendable to increase the lower limit of platelet content of the product to 2.5 × 1011. Particularly for the Intercept system, where a considerable amount of platelets is lost in the purification of the product from Amotosalen, a change in the production process to increase the platelet yield may be necessary. Data from our group show a tendency for improved functional and storage parameters for platelets treated with the Mirasol process. Compared to conventional manufacturing of platelets by apheresis or pooling of buffy coats, pathogen reduction requires additional labour, space, and quality control. Shelf life of platelets is limited in most countries because of the risk of bacterial contamination (in Germany presently to 4 days). A prolongation to 5 or more days after pathogen reduction seems feasible but remains a topic for future studies. Conclusion Results of in vitro and clinical studies of pathogen reduced platelets are promising. Larger clinical trials will help to determine whether PRT proves to be beneficial (reduction of transmission of infections, less alloimmunisation) and overall cost effective (bearing in mind that additional costs may be compensated for by omission of gamma irradiation and potential longer shelf life).