[Diagnostic performance of MR imaging, coloscan and MRI/CT enterography for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]. / Performances et critères de qualité de l'IRM, du colo-scanner, de l'entéro IRM/CT pour le diagnostic d'endométriose pelvienne, RPC Endométriose CNGOF-HAS.

Diagnostic performance of MR imaging for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis are good. Even if some differences of performances exists according the location considered, the risk of misdiagnosis is lower than 10% for trained teams (NP2). The performance of pelvic MR imaging and surgery are quite similar to diagnose endometrioma (sensitivity and specificity>90%). A negative pelvic MR imaging allows to exclude deep pelvic endometriosis with a performance similar to surgery but a positive MR imaging is less accurate than surgery because of a high number of false positives (23%). Pelvic MR imaging is more sensitive and less specific than ultrasonography for the diagnosis of uterosacral ligament, vagina or recto vaginal septum (NP2). Pelvic ultrasonography is more sensitive than pelvic MR imaging for the diagnosis of colorectal location (NP3). Pelvic MR imaging is a reproducible technique for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis (NP3). Regarding, quality criteria of pelvic MR imaging, no data are enough to recommend a specific MR unit, digestive preparation, or a specific moment during the menstrual cycle to realize the examination. Vaginal and/or rectal opacification are options. Most of studies are based a protocol including 3D T2W and 3DT1W sequences. Gadolinium injection is useful to characterize a complex adnexal mass. In clinical routine, slices crossing the kidneys are useful to evaluate the presence of pyelo calic distension. ColoCT is an accurate technique to diagnose pelvic digestive endometriosis (rectosigmoide and iléocaecal) (NP3).

[Accuracy of placenta accreta prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound and MRI in a high-risk population]. / Diagnostic anténatal des placentas accreta : apport de l'échographie et de l'IRM dans une population à risque.

OBJECTIVES: Main objective was to compare accuracy of ultrasonography and MRI for antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. Secondary objectives were to specify the most common sonographic and RMI signs associated with diagnosis of placenta accreta. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study used data collected from all potential cases of placenta accreta (patients with an anterior placenta praevia with history of scarred uterus) admitted from 01/2010 to 12/2014 in a level III maternity unit in Strasbourg, France. High-risk patients beneficiated antenatally from ultrasonography and MRI. Sonographic signs registered were: abnormal placental lacunae, increased vascularity on color Doppler, absence of the retroplacental clear space, interrupted bladder line. MRI signs registered were: abnormal uterine bulging, intraplacental bands of low signal intensity on T2-weighted images, increased vascularity, heterogeneous signal of the placenta on T2-weighed, interrupted bladder line, protrusion of the placenta into the cervix. Diagnosis of placenta accreta was confirmed histologically after hysterectomy or clinically in case of successful conservative treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-two potential cases of placenta accreta were referred to our center and underwent both ultrasonography and MRI. All cases of placenta accreta had a placenta praevia associated with history of scarred uterus. Sensibility and specificity for ultrasonography were, respectively, 0.92 and 0.67, for MRI 0.84 and 0.78 without significant difference (p>0.05). The most relevant signs associated with diagnosis of placenta accreta in ultrasonography were increased vascularity on color Doppler (sensibility 0.85/specificity 0.78), abnormal placental lacunae (sensibility 0.92/specificity 0.55) and loss of retroplacental clear space (sensibility 0.76/specificity 1.0). The most relevant signs in MRI were: abnormal uterine bulging (sensitivity 0.92/specificity 0.89), dark intraplacental bands on T2-weighted images (sensitivity 0.83/specificity 0.80) or placental heterogeneity (sensitivity 0.92/specificity 0.89). Association of two sonographic or MRI signs had the best sensitivity/specificity ratio. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography and RMI represent two interesting and complementary diagnostic tools for antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. Because of its cost and accessibility, ultrasonography remains the first in line to be used for diagnosis. Use of an analytical grid for diagnosis of placenta accreta could be helpful.