RESUMEN
Arrhythmia detection is essential when assessing the safety of novel drugs and therapies in preclinical studies. Many short-term arrhythmia monitoring methods exist, including non-invasive ECG and Holter. However, there are no reliable, long-term, non-invasive, or minimally invasive methods for cardiac arrhythmia follow-up in large animals that allows free movement with littermates. A long follow-up time is needed when estimating the impact of long-lasting drugs or therapies, such as gene therapy. We evaluated the feasibility and performance of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) in pigs for minimally invasive, long-term monitoring of cardiac arrhythmias that allows free movement and species-specific behavior. Multiple implantation sites were tested to assess signal quality. ICMs recognized reliably many different arrhythmias but failed to detect single extrasystoles. They also over-diagnosed T-waves, resulting in oversensing. Muscle activity and natural startles of the animals caused noise, leading to a heterogeneous signal requiring post-recording evaluation. In spite of these shortcomings, the ICMs showed to be very useful for minimally invasive long-term monitoring of cardiac rhythm in pigs.
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas , Animales , Porcinos , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/instrumentación , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/métodos , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Electrocardiografía/instrumentación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/veterinariaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The increasing use of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) for long-term continuous arrhythmia monitoring creates a high volume of transmissions and a significant workload for clinics. The ability to remotely reprogram device alert settings without in-office patient visits was recently introduced, but its impact on clinic workflow compared to the previous ICM iteration is unknown. METHODS: The aim of this real-world study was to evaluate the impact of device reprogramming capabilities on ICM alert burden and on clinic workflow. Deidentified data was obtained from US patients and a total of 19 525 receiving a LINQ II were propensity score-matched with 19 525 implanted with LINQ TruRhythm (TR) ICM based on age and reason for monitoring. RESULTS: After reprogramming, ICM alerts reduced by 20.5% (p < .001). Compared with patients monitored with LINQ TR, patients with LINQ II had their device reprogrammed sooner after implant and more frequently during follow-up. Adoption of remote programming was projected to lead to an annual total clinic time savings of 211 h per 100 ICM patients managed. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that utilization of ICM alert reprogramming has increased with remote capabilities, which may reduce clinic and patient burden for ICM follow-up and free clinician time for other valuable patient care activities.
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria , Humanos , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción CardíacoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is given high priority in clinical guidelines. However, patient selection, electrocardiogram (ECG) modality and screening duration remains undecided and current recommendations vary. METHODS: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical practice of AF screening after ischemic stroke or TIA at Swedish stroke units. In collaboration with the stakeholders of the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke) a digital survey was drafted, then tested and revised by three stroke consultants. The survey consisted of 17 multiple choice/ free text questions and was sent by e-mail to the medical directors at all stroke units in Sweden. RESULTS: All 72 stroke units in Sweden responded to the survey. Most stroke units reported that ≥ 75% of ischemic stroke (69/72 stroke units) or TIA patients (67/72 stroke units), without previously known AF, were screened for AF. Inpatient telemetry ECG was the method of first-choice in 81% of the units, but 7% reported lack of access. A variety of standard monitoring durations were used for inpatient telemetry ECG. The second most common choice was Holter ECG (17%), also with considerable variations in monitoring duration. Other AF screening modalities were used as a first-choice method (handheld and patch ECG) but less frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice for AF screening after ischemic stroke or TIA differed between Swedish stroke units, both in choice of AF screening methods as well as in monitoring durations. There is an urgent need for evidence and evidence-based recommendations in this field. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/complicaciones , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Suecia/epidemiología , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: In patients with atrial flutter (AFL), ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is a highly effective procedure to prevent AFL recurrence, but atrial fibrillation (AF) may occur during follow-up. The presented FLUTFIB study was designed to identify the exact incidence, duration, timely occurrence, and associated symptoms of AF after CTI ablation using continuous cardiac monitoring via implantable loop recorders. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients with AFL without prior AF diagnosis were included after CTI ablation (mean age 69.7 ± 9.7 years, 18% female) and received an implantable loop recorder for AF detection. After a median follow-up of 24 months 77 patients (77%) were diagnosed with AF episodes. Median time to first AF occurrence was 180 (43-298) days. Episodes lasted longer than 1 h in most patients (45/77, 58%). Forty patients (52%) had AF-associated symptoms.Patients with and without AF development showed similar baseline characteristics and neither HATCH- nor CHA2DS2-VASc scores were predictive of future AF episodes. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) was stopped during FU in 32 patients (32%) and was re-initiated after AF detection in 15 patients (15%). No strokes or transient ischaemic attack episodes were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest investigation using implantable loop recorders (ILRs) to detect AF after AFL ablation and shows a high incidence of AF episodes, most of them being asymptomatic and lasting longer than 1 h. In anticipation of trials determining the duration of AF episodes that should trigger OAC initiation, these results will help to guide anticoagulation management after CTI ablation.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Aleteo Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Aleteo Atrial/diagnóstico , Aleteo Atrial/epidemiología , Aleteo Atrial/cirugía , Incidencia , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The exercise stress testing may unmask the type 1 Brugada pattern on the surface electrocardiogram in a portion of patients with Brugada syndrome. The occurrence of the type 1 Brugada pattern during an exercise test in pediatric patients is not common. Consequently, the diagnostic yield of the exercise test in this population is still to be explored. We present a case of exercise-induced type 1 Brugada pattern in a 12-year-old child with episodes of palpitations and discuss the available evidence on the role of the exercise stress test in the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with Brugada syndrome.
RESUMEN
Remote Monitoring (RM) has been shown to provide useful information about arrhythmic events in patients with implantable loop recorders (ILRs), however there is few and conflicting data about the false positive (FP) alarms burden and characteristics among ILR recipients. The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate incidence and characteristics of FP alarms among ILR patients followed by RM. We developed a systematic research in Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed databases and selected all papers focused on false positive ILR transmissions published from June 1, 2013 to June 1, 2023. Case reports, meeting summaries, posters and simple reviews were excluded. Twelve reports were finally selected, including five prospective and seven retrospective studies. Information about population characteristics, device type and setting, overall transmissions and FP alarms and any adopted strategies to reduce them were extracted from an overall population of 3.305 patients. FP alarms were 59.7% of the overall remote transmissions and were found in 1/5 of the analyzed population. FP alarms for atrial fibrillation were the most common cause of false transmissions and were mainly due to premature atrial and ventricular complexes. No clinical predictors of FP alarms were identified, except for nonparasternal ILR implantation site. Since the overload work due to FP alarms might reduce the benefit of remote monitoring of ILR patients, the device optimization is an important step until an help from machine-learning algorithms is available.
Asunto(s)
Alarmas Clínicas , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria , Humanos , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/instrumentación , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Arritmias CardíacasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) face an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) have emerged as effective tools for detecting arrhythmias in BrS. Technological advancements, including temperature sensors and improved subcutaneous electrocardiogram (subECG) signal quality, hold promise for further enhancing their utility in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We present a case of a 40-year-old man exhibiting a BrS type 2 pattern on 12-lead ECG, who underwent ICM insertion (BIOMONITOR IIIm, BIOTRONIK) due to drug-induced BrS type 1 pattern and a history of syncope, with a negative response to programmed ventricular stimulation. The device contains an integrated temperature sensor and can transmit daily vital data, such as mean heart rate and physical activity. Several months later, remote alerts indicated a temperature increase, along with transmitted subECGs suggesting a fever-induced BrS type 1 pattern. The patient was promptly advised to commence antipyretic therapy. Over the following days, remotely monitored parameters showed decreases in mean temperature, physical activity, and mean heart rate, without further recurrence of abnormal subECGs. CONCLUSION: ICMs offer valuable insights beyond arrhythmia detection in BrS. Early detection of fever using embedded temperature sensors may improve patient management, while continuous subECG morphological analysis has the potential to enhance risk stratification in BrS patients.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Brugada , Humanos , Síndrome de Brugada/fisiopatología , Masculino , Adulto , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/instrumentación , Temperatura Corporal , Tecnología de Sensores Remotos/instrumentación , Electrocardiografía , Diseño de EquipoRESUMEN
Pediatric cardiac symptoms such as palpitations, syncope, or seizure-like episodes pose diagnostic challenges for general pediatricians. These symptoms, though often benign, may reveal underlying arrhythmias or inherited cardiac conditions (ICCs), affecting the quality of life and limiting activity participation. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of implantable loop recorders (ILRs) in diagnosing and managing arrhythmias in pediatric patients. A retrospective cohort study conducted over an 8-year period from January 2016 to December 2023 in a single pediatric cardiology center. A cohort of 155 pediatric patients (median age 11.4 years) who underwent ILR implantation were selected based on symptoms such as palpitations, chest pain, or syncope, and those with previously recorded arrhythmias or high-risk ICCs. The primary outcomes were the diagnostic yield of ILRs for arrhythmias and subsequent changes in patient management. Diagnostic yield was defined as the detection of relevant arrhythmias, such as pauses of 3 s or longer, high-degree AV block, sinus node dysfunction, supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, or inappropriate sinus tachycardia. The median follow-up period was 2.3 years (845 days). Diagnostic arrhythmias were recorded in 60% of patients with symptom-activated transmissions and 80% of device-activated transmissions. Sinus pauses (37.5%) and VT (30%) were the most common arrhythmias detected. In patients with syncope (n = 76), 30% had relevant arrhythmias. In the palpitations group (n = 20), 35% had relevant arrhythmias. Approximately 80% of patients with ILR-diagnosed arrhythmias underwent targeted management, including medication changes and additional procedures. No significant complications were observed; minor complications occurred in 2.5% of patients.Conclusions: New generation ILRs are effective and safe for diagnosing and managing pediatric arrhythmias, providing significant reassurance to patients and families. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of ILRs on quality of life and sports participation in high-risk young patients.
RESUMEN
Telemedicine and remote monitoring devices, including implantable loop recorders (ILR), are increasingly adopted in the cardiologic setting. These are valuable tools in the arrhythmic stratification of patients at risk of sudden cardiac death, providing a tailored therapeutic management to prevent lethal arrhythmias. We report a case of an asymptomatic 18-year-old boy with a family history of syncope and cardiac arrest, who had a diagnosis of Brugada syndrome with an inducible type 1 pattern and carrier of a missense mutation of the SCN5A gene. In light of the risk factors, although not recommended by current guidelines, we decided to proceed with the implantation of an ILR with remote monitoring service. A few months later, an episode of asymptomatic sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia was promptly observed by the remote monitoring, leading to a timely implantation of a subcutaneous cardiac implantable defibrillator.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Brugada , Desfibriladores Implantables , Telemedicina , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome de Brugada/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Brugada/genética , Síndrome de Brugada/terapia , Adolescente , Telemedicina/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Canal de Sodio Activado por Voltaje NAV1.5/genética , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Electrocardiografía , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/instrumentación , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/métodos , Mutación Missense , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: The increasing use of insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) produces a high rate of false positive (FP) diagnoses. Their verification results in a high workload for caregivers. We evaluated the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based ILR-ECG Analyzer™ (ILR-ECG-A). This machine-learning algorithm reclassifies ICM-transmitted events to minimize the rate of FP diagnoses, while preserving device sensitivity. METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected 546 recipients of ICM followed by the Implicity™ monitoring platform. To avoid clusterization, a single episode per ICM abnormal diagnosis (e.g. asystole, bradycardia, atrial tachycardia (AT)/atrial fibrillation (AF), ventricular tachycardia, artefact) was selected per patient, and analyzed by the ILR-ECG-A, applying the same diagnoses as the ICM. All episodes were reviewed by an adjudication committee (AC) and the results were compared. Among 879 episodes classified as abnormal by the ICM, 80 (9.1%) were adjudicated as 'Artefacts', 283 (32.2%) as FP, and 516 (58.7%) as 'abnormal' by the AC. The algorithm reclassified 215 of the 283 FP as normal (76.0%), and confirmed 509 of the 516 episodes as abnormal (98.6%). Seven undiagnosed false negatives were adjudicated as AT or non-specific abnormality. The overall diagnostic specificity was 76.0% and the sensitivity was 98.6%. CONCLUSION: The new AI-based ILR-ECG-A lowered the rate of FP ICM diagnoses significantly while retaining a > 98% sensitivity. This will likely alleviate considerably the clinical burden represented by the review of ICM events.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Fibrilación Atrial , Humanos , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/métodos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Electrocardiografía , AlgoritmosRESUMEN
Background: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients diagnosed with Brugada syndrome (BrS) who underwent implantable loop recorder (ILR) insertion during routine clinical activity. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive screening of all consecutive patients diagnosed with BrS at our institution. We analyzed baseline clinical characteristics, arrhythmic findings, and outcomes. Results: Out of 147 BrS patients, 42 (29 %) received an ILR, 13 (9 %) underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement, and 92 patients (63 %) continued regular cardiological follow-up. Patients who received an ILR had a higher prevalence of suspected arrhythmic syncope (43 % vs. 22 %, p = 0.012) and tended to be younger (median age 38 years, interquartile range 30-52, vs. 43 years, 35-55, p = 0.044) with a higher presence of SCN5A gene mutations (17 % vs. 6 %, p = 0.066) compared to those who continued regular follow-up. Additionally, compared to patients with an ICD, those with an ILR had a significantly lower frequency of positive programmed ventricular stimulation (0 % vs. 91 %, p < 0.001). During a median follow-up period of 14.7 months (4.7-44.8), no deaths occurred among the patients with ILR. Eight individuals (19 %) were diagnosed with arrhythmic findings through continuous ILR monitoring, primarily atrial fibrillation, and asystolic pauses. The median time from insertion to the occurrence of these events was 8.7 months (3.6-46.4). No adverse events related to ILR were reported. Conclusion: Continuous monitoring with ILR may facilitate the timely detection of non-malignant rhythm disorders in BrS patients with risk factors but without an indication for primary prevention ICD implantation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An implantable loop recorder is an effective tool for diagnosing unexplained syncope. However, after a first episode in non-high-risk patients, the usefulness of implantable loop recorder implantation remains unclear. AIMS: To analyse relevant risk factors for significant bradycardia in order to identify patients who do or do not benefit from implantable loop recorder implantation. Also, to study whether implantable loop recorder implantation with remote monitoring is associated with less recurrence of traumatic syncope. METHODS: This was a retrospective monocentric study including patients with implantable loop recorder implantation after unexplained syncope, using remote monitoring and iterative consultations. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-seven patients were implanted for unexplained syncope. Significant bradycardia occurred in 53 patients (22.4%): 23 (43.4%) caused by paroxysmal atrioventricular block and 30 (56.6%) caused by sinus node dysfunction, leading to permanent pacemaker implantation in 48 patients. Compared with younger patients, there was a 3.46-fold increase (95% confidence interval 1.92-6.23; P<0.0001) in the risk of significant bradycardia in patients aged≥60 years. Based on multivariable analysis, only "typical syncope" was associated with significant bradycardia occurrence (hazard ratio 3.14, 95% confidence interval 1.75-5.65; P=0.0001). There was no recurrence of significant bradycardia with traumatic complications among patients implanted for traumatic syncope. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that: (1) implantable loop recorders identify more significant bradycardia in patients aged≥60 presenting with a first non-high-risk typical syncope, suggesting that an implantable loop recorder should be implanted after a first episode of unexplained syncope in such conditions; and (2) after traumatic syncope, implantable loop recorder implantation is safe, and is associated with little or no recurrence of traumatic syncope.
Asunto(s)
Bradicardia , Síncope , Humanos , Bradicardia/diagnóstico , Bradicardia/terapia , Bradicardia/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síncope/diagnóstico , Síncope/etiología , Síncope/terapia , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Electrodos Implantados/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The reimbursement policy for cryptogenic stroke (CS) was expanded in November 2018 from recurrent strokes to the first stroke episode. No reports have demonstrated whether this policy change has affected trends in implantable loop recorder (ILR) utilization. METHODS: We identified patients who received an ILR implant using the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database between July 2016 and October 2021. Patients meeting all the following criteria were considered to have CS indication: 1) prior stroke history, 2) no previous history of atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL), and 3) no maintenance of oral anticoagulant for ≥4 weeks within a year before ILR implant. AF/AFL diagnosed within 3 years after ILR implant or before ILR removal was considered ILR-driven. RESULTS: Among 3,056 patients, 1,001 (32.8%) had CS indications. The total ILR implant number gradually increased for both CS and non-CS indications and the number of CS indication significantly increased after implementing the expanded reimbursement policy. The detection rate for AF/AFL was 26.3% in CS patients over 3 years, which was significantly higher in patients implanted with an ILR within 2 months after stroke than those implanted later. CONCLUSION: The expanded coverage policy for CS had a significant impact on the number of ILR implantation for CS indication. The diagnostic yield of ILR for AF/AFL detection seems better when ILR is implanted within 2 months than later. Further investigation is needed to demonstrate other clinical benefits and the optimal ILR implantation timing.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Humanos , República de Corea , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Factores de Tiempo , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/instrumentación , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/economía , AdultoRESUMEN
AIMS: Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly being used for long-term cardiac monitoring in different clinical settings. The aim of this study was to investigate the real-world performance of ILRs-including the time to diagnosis- in unselected patients with different ILR indications. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicenter, observational study, 871 patients with an indication of pre-syncope/syncope (61.9%), unexplained palpitations (10.4%), and atrial fibrillation (AF) detection with a history of cryptogenic stroke (CS) (27.7%) underwent ILR implantation. The median follow-up was 28.8 ± 12.9 months. In the presyncope/syncope group, 167 (31%) received a diagnosis established by the device. Kaplan-Meier estimates indicated that 16.9% of patients had a diagnosis at 6 months, and the proportion increased to 22.5% at 1 year. Of 91 patients with palpitations, 20 (22%) received a diagnosis based on the device. The diagnosis established at 12.2% of patients at 6 months, and the proportion increased to 13.3% at 1 year. Among 241 patients with CS, 47 (19.5%) were diagnosed with AF. The diagnostic yield of the device was 10.4% at 6 months and 12.4% at 1 year. In all cases, oral anticoagulation was initiated. Overall, ILR diagnosis altered the therapeutic strategy in 26.1% in presyncope/syncope group, 2.2% in palpitations group, and 3.7% in CS group in addition to oral anticoagulation initiation. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world patient population, ILR determines diagnosis and initiates a new therapeutic management in nearly one fourth of patients. ILR implantation is valuable in the evaluation of patients with unexplained presyncope/syncope, CS and palpitations.
RESUMEN
A 75-year-old man with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy underwent placement of a long-sensing vector implantable loop recorder (ILR) for unexplained syncope. One month later, ILR remote monitoring revealed unstable R-wave amplitudes ranging from very high (>1.9â¯mV) to very low (<0.2â¯mV) values. During an in-hospital clinic visit, the only site to establish communication with the ILR was the left posterior axillary area. Chest computed tomography confirmed ILR migration into the anterior costophrenic recess. The device was retrieved with forceps during video thoracoscopy without further complications. Learning objective: This is the first case report of migration of an implantable loop recorder diagnosed by remote monitoring.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In patients with a history of stroke or those at high risk for developing stroke, a continuous rhythm monitoring strategy using an implantable loop recorder (ILR) is often performed to screen for atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review (MEDLINE and EMBASE) including randomized controlled trials comparing ILR-based continuous rhythm monitoring vs usual care in patients with a history of stroke or patients at high risk for developing stroke. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed, and aggregate risk ratio (RR) and risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials with 7237 patients (ILR 2114, non-ILR 5123) were included. ILR vs non-ILR was associated with increased detection of incident AF (RR 3.88; 95% CI 2.23-6.75; P <.00001; number needed to treat [NNT] = 7.7; I2 = 61%), increased appropriate initiation of anticoagulation (RR 2.29; 95% CI 2.07-2.55; P <.00001; NNT = 6.7; I2 = 0), and a 25% lower risk of developing stroke (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.95]; P = .02; NNT = 100; I2 = 0%). In patients with history of stroke there was no difference in the risk of developing incident stroke (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.61-1.14]; P = .25; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis showed that screening for AF with ILR is associated with increased detection of AF and increased initiation of appropriate anticoagulation therapy in patients with a history of stroke or those with risk factors for stroke. The benefit of stroke risk reduction with ILR remains unclear, and future studies focused on the inclusion of patients without a history of stroke are needed to elucidate this uncertainty.
RESUMEN
Identifying the underlying cause of unexplained syncope is crucial for appropriate management of recurrent syncopal episodes. Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) have emerged as valuable diagnostic tools for monitoring patients with unexplained syncope. However, the predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with ILR and unexplained syncope remain unclear. In this study, we shed light on these prognostic factors. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were systematically searched until May 04, 2023. Studies that evaluated the predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with implantable loop recorder and unexplained syncope were included. The "Quality In Prognosis Studies" appraisal tool was used for quality assessment. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated. The publication bias was evaluated using Egger's and Begg's tests. Ten studies (n = 4200) were included. Right bundle branch block (OR: 3.264; 95% CI: 1.907-5.588, p < .0001) and bifascicular block (OR: 2.969; 95% CI: 1.859-4.742, p < .0001) were the strongest predictors for pacemaker implantation. Pacemaker requirement was more than two times in patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus bradycardia and first degree AV block. Valvular heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension were also significantly more in patients with pacemaker implantation. Age (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.560; 95% CI: 0.410/0.710, p < .0001) and PR interval (SMD: 0.351; 95% CI: 0.150/0.553, p = .001) were significantly higher in patients with pacemaker requirement. Heart conduction disorders, atrial arrhythmias and underlying medical conditions are main predictors of pacemaker device implantation following loop recorder installation in unexplained syncopal patients.
Asunto(s)
Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria , Marcapaso Artificial , Síncope , Humanos , Síncope/terapia , Síncope/diagnóstico , Síncope/etiología , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/instrumentación , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , PronósticoRESUMEN
In patients with unexplained syncope, implantable loop recorders (ILR) are used to detect arrhythmias as a cause of syncope. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic yield and clinical implications arising from ILR implantation in patients with syncope in Germany. Secondary longitudinal data were obtained from a large German research database including anonymized data from nationwide statutory health insurances, representative for the German population. Patients ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of syncope and ILR implantation between 2017 and 2018 were analyzed, and cardiac diagnoses and therapies during a follow-up period of two years assessed. Of 2,403,301 continuously insured persons in 2017-2018, 1360 (0.1%) received an ILR and 675 patients (45.6% female) were included. During follow-up, arrhythmias were diagnosed in 65.0%. The following antiarrhythmic therapies were established: pacemaker and defibrillator implantations in 20% and 1.5%, respectively, ablation therapy in 3.0%, and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in 4.7%. Aside from the diagnoses typically associated with syncope, atrial fibrillation or flutter was diagnosed in 37.0%, and anticoagulation therapy was initiated in 21.5%. There was a high diagnostic yield of arrhythmias following ILR implantation, leading to a relevant number of syncope-specific treatment. Arrhythmias not necessarily related to syncope were also diagnosed, leading to a high rate of anticoagulation therapy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly used to evaluate patients with unexplained syncope. Identification of all predictors of bradycardic syncope and consequent permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion is of substantial clinical interest as patients in the highest risk category may benefit from upfront pacemaker insertion. OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk predictors for PPM insertion in ILR recipients with unexplained syncope. METHODS: An electronic database search (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) was performed in June 2023. Studies evaluating ILR recipients with unexplained syncope and recording risk factors for eventual PPM insertion were included. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) for clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics with respect to future PPM requirement. RESULTS: Eight studies evaluating 1007 ILR recipients were included; 268 patients (26.6%) underwent PPM insertion during study follow-up. PPM recipients were older (mean age, 70.2 ± 15.4 years vs 61.6 ± 19.7 years; P < .001). PR prolongation on baseline electrocardiography was a significant predictor of PPM requirement (pooled OR, 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-5.20). The presence of distal conduction system disease, encompassing any bundle branch or fascicular block, yielded a pooled OR of 2.88 for PPM insertion (95% confidence interval, 1.53-5.41). Injurious syncope and lack of syncopal prodrome were not significant predictors of PPM insertion. Sinus node dysfunction accounted for 62% of PPM insertions, whereas atrioventricular block accounted for 26%. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-quarter of ILR recipients for unexplained syncope require eventual PPM insertion. Advancing age, PR prolongation, and distal conduction disease are the strongest predictors for PPM requirement.