Ponte osteotomies for treatment of spinal deformities: they are not all made equal.

PURPOSE: To compare surgical outcomes of Ponte's osteotomies for treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK), and adult scoliosis (AdS). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with AIS, SK, and AdIS who underwent posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF) at our Institution from January 2019 to December 2022. Demographics, imaging, and intraoperative data (including number of osteotomies performed, blood losses, surgical timing, and complications) were extracted from patient charts. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients (62 AIS, 7 SK, and 11 AdS) were enrolled in the study. All patients were treated with a PSIF and a total of 506 Ponte osteotomies were performed (5.8 ± 4.1, 9.3 ± 2.4, and 7.5 ± 2.5 average osteotomies per patient in the AIS, SK, and AdS group, respectively; p = 0.045). Average time per osteotomy was 6.3 ± 1.5 min in the AIS group, and 5.8 ± 2.1 and 8.7 ± 4.0 in the SK and AdS group, respectively (p = 0.002). Blood loss was significantly smaller in the SK group (8.6 ± 9.6 ml per osteotomy) compared to AIS group (34.9 ± 23.7 ml) and AdS group (34.9 ± 32.7 ml) (p = 0.001). A total of 4 complications were observed in the AIS group (1.1%) and 2 complications in the AdS group (2.4%), but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that Ponte's osteotomies are safe and effective in surgical treatment of AIS, SK, and AdS. Blood loss and execution time per osteotomy are significantly smaller in the SK group compared to AIS and AdS. No significant differences were noted in terms of complications between the three groups.

Comparison of staged LLIF combined with posterior instrumented fusion with posterior instrumented fusion alone for the treatment of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis with sagittal imbalance.

BACKGROUND: To retrospectively compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of staged lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) combined with posterior instrumented fusion(PIF)with PIF alone for the treatment of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis (ADLS) with sagittal imbalance. METHODS: ADLS patients with sagittal imbalance underwent corrective surgery were included and divided into staged group (underwent multilevel LLIF in the first-stage and PIF in the second-stage) and control group (PIF alone). The clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with an average age of 69.7±6.3 years were enrolled, including 25 in the staged group and 20 in the control group. Compared with preoperative values, patients in both groups achieved significant improvement in terms of ODI, VAS back, VAS leg and spinopelvic parameters after surgery, which were maintained well during the follow-up period. Compared with control group, total operative time in the staged group was longer, but the amounts of blood loss and blood transfusion were reduced. The average posterior fixation segments were 6.20±1.78 in the staged group and 8.25±1.16 in the control group (P<0.01), respectively. Posterior column osteotomy (PCO) was performed in 9 patients (36%) in the staged group, while PCO and/or pedicle subtraction osteotomy were performed in 15 patients (75%) in the control group (P<0.01). There was no difference in complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Both surgical strategies were effective for the treatment of ADLS with sagittal imbalance. However, staged treatment was less invasive, which reduced the number of posterior fixation segments and osteotomy requirement.

Prosthetic Hip Dislocations in Direct Anterior Versus Posterior Approach in Patients With Instrumented Lumbar Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Instrumented posterior lumbar spinal fusion (IPLSF) has been demonstrated to contribute to instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is unclear whether a supine direct anterior (DA) approach reduces the risk of instability. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,773 patients who underwent THA through either a DA approach or a posterior approach at our institution over a 7-year period was performed. Radiographic and chart reviews were then used to identify our primary group of interest comprised of 111 patients with previous IPLSF. Radiographic review, chart review, and phone survey was performed. Dislocation rates in each approach group were then compared within this cohort of patients with IPLSF. RESULTS: Within the group of patients with IPLSF, 33.3% (n = 37) received a DA approach while 66.6% (n = 74) received a posterior approach. None of the 9 total dislocations in the DA group had IPLSF, whereas 4 of the 16 total dislocations in the posterior approach group had IPLSF (P = .78). When examining the larger group of patients, including those without IPLSF, patients undergoing a DA approach had a lower BMI and were likely have a smaller head size implanted (P < .001 for both). Using Fischer's exact test, fusion was associated with dislocation in the posterior approach group (P < .01), whereas fusion was not associated with dislocation in the anterior approach group (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: While there was no significant difference in dislocation rates between posterior and anterior approach groups, in patients with IPLSF, the anterior approach had a lower percentage of dislocation events compared to the posterior approach.

Instrumented fusion versus instrumented non-fusion following expansive open-door laminoplasty for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty with instrumented fusion (ELIF) and expansive open-door laminoplasty with instrumented non-fusion (ELINF) for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). METHODS: Patients who underwent ELIF or ELINF due to multilevel cervical OPLL from June 2013 to June 2019 were identified. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were enrolled in this study with a minimum follow-up of 24 months, including 42 patients in the ELIF group and 36 patients in the ELINF group. At the final follow-up, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and C2-C7 Cobb angle in the ELIF group were significantly better than those in the ELINF group, and cervical range of movement (ROM) in the ELIF group decreased significantly than that in the ELINF group. The incidence of OPLL progression at the final follow-up was 4.76% (2/42) in the ELIF group and 27.78% (10/36) in the ELINF group. Postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) score improved significantly in each group, but JOA score and recovery rate (RR) in the ELIF group were significantly better than those in the ELINF group at the final follow-up. When K-line was positive, the difference in the final JOA score between the two groups was not significant, but the RR in the ELIF group was significantly better than that in the ELINF group. When K-line was negative, the final JOA score and RR in the ELIF group were significant higher than those in the ELINF group. CONCLUSIONS: ELIF and ELINF were two effective surgical procedures for treating multilevel cervical OPLL. However, ELIF was superior to ELINF due to better postoperative JOA score and RR, significant improvement of C2-C7 Cobb angle and maintenance of SVA, and suppressant effect on OPLL progression, especially for patients with K-line ( - ) OPLL.

Laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a long-term study of a national cohort.

PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported 5-year clinical outcomes between laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with instrumented fusion in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy in a population-based cohort. METHODS: All patients in the national Swedish Spine Register (Swespine) from January 2006 until March 2019, with degenerative cervical myelopathy, were assessed. Multiple imputation and propensity score matching based on clinicodemographic and radiographic parameters were used to compare patients treated with laminectomy alone with patients treated with laminectomy plus posterior-lateral instrumented fusion. The primary outcome measure was the European Myelopathy Score, a validated patient-reported outcome measure. The scale ranges from 5 to 18, with lower scores reflecting more severe myelopathy. RESULTS: Among 967 eligible patients, 717 (74%) patients were included. Laminectomy alone was performed on 412 patients (mean age 68 years; 149 women [36%]), whereas instrumented fusion was added for 305 patients (mean age 68 years; 119 women [39%]). After imputation, the propensity for smoking, worse myelopathy scores, spondylolisthesis, and kyphosis was slightly higher in the fusion group. After imputation and propensity score matching, there were on average 212 pairs patients with a 5-year follow-up in each group. There were no important differences in patient-reported clinical outcomes between the methods after 5 years. Due to longer hospitalization times and implant-related costs, the mean cost increase per instrumented patient was approximately $4700 US. CONCLUSIONS: Instrumented fusions generated higher costs and were not associated with superior long-term clinical outcomes. These findings are based on a national cohort and can thus be regarded as generalizable.

Surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy with athetoid cerebral palsy remains unestablished. Instrumented fusion is reported to have good clinical results; however, there are no data of decompression surgery for this pathology in recent years. This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of laminoplasty with or without posterior instrumented fusion for cervical myelopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy. METHODS: A multi-centre surgical series of patients with cervical myelopathy and athetoid cerebral palsy were enrolled in this study. All patients showed symptoms and signs suggestive of cervical myelopathy and underwent laminoplasty with or without instrumented fusion. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Barthel index (BI), and changes in the C2-C7 sagittal Cobb angle in the lateral plain radiograph were analysed. RESULTS: There were 25 patients (16 men and 9 women; mean age, 54.4 ± 10.8 years) with cervical myelopathy and athetoid cerebral palsy who underwent surgical treatment. The mean follow-up period was 41.9 ± 35.6 months. Overall, the BI significantly improved after surgery, whereas the JOA score and C2-C7 angle did not improve postoperatively. The recovery rate of the JOA score in the laminoplasty group was significantly higher than that of the fusion group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical laminoplasty with or without instrumented fusion for treating cervical myelopathy due to athetoid cerebral palsy is effective in improving activities of daily living. Cervical laminoplasty may be an effective and less invasive surgical method for selective patients, especially for those with small involuntary movements and no remarkable cervical kyphosis nor instability.

The Majority of Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients With a Stiff Spine Do Not Have an Instrumented Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients with limited lumbar flexion (LF) have increased rates of dislocation. An instrumented spinal fusion is a well-recognized cause whose risk increases with increasing number of levels fused. However, many patients without an instrumented fusion (IF) also exhibit abnormal spinopelvic mobility. The purpose of this study was to understand the proportion of THA patients without an IF that have a stiff spine (SS) and behave as if they are surgically fused. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 6340 primary THA patients, all of whom had preoperative spinopelvic measurements. Any IF of the lumbar spine was observed on the lateral standing radiograph and recorded. SS was classified by LF ≤ 20°, and the percentage of patients with an IF and limited LF was determined. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-six (6%) patients had a SS, and only 67 (19%) had an IF. Of the entire 6340 patients, 207 (3%) had an IF. Of these 207, only 67 (32%) had a SS. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority (81%) of THA patients with a SS do not have an IF. We recommend preoperative spinopelvic assessment of all patients undergoing THA, as only a minority of those with limited LF have an IF and may otherwise be overlooked. Lumbar degenerative disc disease is common in THA patients, limits the available LF in the same way an IF might and potentially increases the risk of dislocation in this subset of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Segmental vs non-segmental thoracic pedicle screws constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is there any implant alloy effect?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to understand how many anchor sites are necessary to obtain maximum posterior correction of idiopathic scoliotic curve and if the alloy of instrumentation, stainless steel or titanium, may have a role in the percent of scoliosis correction. METHODS: We reviewed 143 consecutive patients, affected by AIS (Lenke 1-2), who underwent a posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screw-only instrumentation between 2002 and 2005. According to the implant density and alloy used we divided the cohort in four groups. RESULTS: All 143 patients were reviewed at an average follow-up of 7, 2 years, the overall final main thoracic curve correction averaged 61.4%, whereas the implant density within the major curve averaged 71%. A significant correlation was observed between final% MT correction and preoperative MT flexibility and implant density. CONCLUSIONS: When stainless steel instrumentation is used non-segmental pedicle screw constructs seem to be equally effective as segmental instrumentations in obtaining satisfactory results in patients with main thoracic AIS. When the implant alloy used is titanium one, an implant density of ≥60% should be guaranteed to achieve similar results.

Expansive open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and instrumented fusion for cases with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and straight lordosis.

PURPOSE: To identify whether expansive open-door laminoplasty (Lam) is more appropriate than laminectomy and instrumented fusion (LIF) for cases with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and straight cervical lordosis. METHODS: A total of 67 cases were included and divided into Group Lam (n = 32) and Group LIF (n = 35), and the mean follow-up periods were 38 and 42 months, respectively. The cervical lordosis was elevated by C2-7 Cobb angle and cervical sagittal balance by C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), neurological recovery rate (RR) being calculated by the JOA, visual analog scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) were used to assess clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Differences in general data between two groups were not significant. Total blood loss and operation duration in Group Lam were both significantly less than that in the Group LIF. By the final follow-up, the cervical lordosis significantly decreased in Group Lam and increased in Group LIF, the SVA significantly increased in Group Lam and kept unchanged in Group LIF, and the JOA, VAS, NDI significantly improved in both groups. Although there was no significant difference in RR between the two groups, cases in Group Lam had significantly larger incidence of postoperative kyphosis and kyphotic change rate, and less VAS, NDI and incidence of axial pain than cases in Group LIF. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with the LIF, the Lam is recommended for cases with OPLL and straight cervical lordosis when taking comparable neurological recovery, less axial pain and better neck function improvement into consideration.

Management of pediatric single-level vertebral hemangiomas presenting with myelopathy by three-pronged approach (ethanol embolization, laminectomy, and instrumentation): a single-institute experience.

PURPOSE: Pediatric vertebral hemangiomas (VH) are exceedingly rare benign and highly vascular tumours of the spine. There are no guidelines available for management of these patients in literature. Purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of intraoperative ethanol embolization, surgical decompression, and instrumented fusion in pediatric symptomatic VH with single-level involvement. METHODS: Surgery consisted of intraoperative bilateral pedicular absolute alcohol injection and laminectomy at the level of pathology followed by a short-/long-segment instrumented fusion using pedicle screws and rod. Seven patients (mean age 14 ± 2.4 years, range 10-17 years, five females and two males) (age < 18 years) who were treated using this technique at our institute since March 2008 to December 2013 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Demographical, clinical, radiological, operative details, and postoperative events were retrieved from hospital records. During follow-up visits, clinical status and imaging were recorded. Outcome assessed with clinical and neurological outcome score of American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale. RESULTS: Duration of symptoms ranged from 3 to 60 months (mean, 14.7 ± 20.4 months). Clinical features include myelopathy with motor and sensory involvement in all (five were paraplegic), back pain in two patients, and bladder involvement in two patients. The preoperative American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) were B in five patients and C and D in one patient each. All had pan vertebral body VH with severe cord compression in the thoracic region on imaging study. Mean duration of surgery was 248.6 ± 60 minutes (range 195-310 min) and blood loss was 535 ml (range 200-1500 ml). Immediate embolization was achieved in all patients, which allowed laminectomy and soft tissue hemangioma removal relatively easy. Post surgery, at mean follow-up of 45.3 (±23.2) months (range 1-78 months), all patients showed improvement in power (sphincter improvement in two patients). ASIA were E in six patients and D in one patient at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: The present study is the largest series of pediatric symptomatic VH. This procedure is a safe, efficient method to treat symptomatic pediatric VH with severe cord compression. It seems to serve the purpose of providing embolization, cord decompression, rigid fusion at the same sitting without adding new morbidity, and preventing excessive blood loss.

Surgical outcomes after instrumented lumbar surgery in patients of eighty years of age and older.

BACKGROUND: In Taiwan, the life expectancy of an 80-year-old man is 88.4 years and the life expectancy of an 80-year-old woman is 89.8 years. Some of these people will develop symptomatic degenerative lumbar diseases that interfere with an active lifestyle. These older surgical candidates usually ask the surgeon whether it would be safe to undergo surgery. However, there is no literature assessing the outcomes of laminectomy, fusion and posterior fixation for degenerative lumbar diseases in patients older than 80 years. The purpose of this study was to report the surgical outcomes of patients 80 years of age and older who underwent spinal decompression and instrumented lumbar arthrodesis for degeneration lumbar diseases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with degenerative lumbar diseases and spinal stenosis who underwent surgery between January 2010 and December 2012. Inclusion criteria were age greater than or equal to 80 years, decompression with instrumented lumbar arthrodesis, and at least 2 years of follow-up. Totally 89 patients were studies. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) of leg and back pain. Plain radiographs (lateral, anteroposterior, and flexion-extension) were used to assess the status of fusion and implant-related complications. Every complication during admission and any implant-related or failed-back syndrome requiring a second surgery was documented. T test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Five patients were lost to follow-up, and another 12 died during the follow-up period. One patient died due to cerebral stroke just 2 days after surgery, and the other 11 patients passed away 3 months to 4 years postoperatively. In all, 72 patients had an adequate follow-up: 44 were female and 28 were male. The average age at surgery was 82.5 ± 2.6 years (80 to 93); 63 patients underwent their first lumbar surgery, and nine patients received a second surgery. Patients underwent arthrodesis surgeries were from a single-level to a 7-level. Four patients developed complications (5.6 %, 4/72). At the final follow-up, the average ODI score was lower than the preoperative score (30.0 vs. 61.8) (p < 0.001). The average VAS score also showed improvement (leg: p < 0.001; back: p < 0.001). Forty-three patients were classified as "satisfied", and 29 were "dissatisfied". Longer operation time (p = 0.014) and development of complications (p = 0.049) were related to poor clinical results. Radiographic follow-up showed that 53 patients had solid union, ten had a probable union, and nine had pseudarthrosis. More surgical segments led to a greater chance of pseudarthrosis (2.0 ± 0.9 vs 3.0 ± 1.8, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Longer instrumented segments and development of complications contributed to worse clinical and radiographic outcomes. With proper patient selection, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion can be safe and effective for patients 80 years of age and older with degenerative lumbar conditions.

A comparison of minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression and open anterior cervical decompression and instrumented fusion in the surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression (miPCD) has been described in several case series with promising preliminary results. The object of the current study was to compare the clinical outcomes between patients undergoing miPCD with anterior cervical discectomy and instrumented fusion (ACDFi). METHODS A retrospective study of 74 patients undergoing surgery (45 using miPCD and 29 using ACDFi) for myelopathy was performed. Outcomes were categorized into short-term, intermediate, and long-term follow-up, corresponding to averages of 1.7, 7.7, and 30.9 months, respectively. Mean scores for the Neck Disability Index (NDI), neck visual analog scale (VAS) score, SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS), and SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS) were compared for each follow-up period. The percentage of patients meeting substantial clinical benefit (SCB) was also compared for each outcome measure. RESULTS Baseline patient characteristics were well-matched, with the exception that patients undergoing miPCD were older (mean age 57.6 ± 10.0 years [miPCD] vs 51.1 ± 9.2 years [ACDFi]; p = 0.006) and underwent surgery at more levels (mean 2.8 ± 0.9 levels [miPCD] vs 1.5 ± 0.7 levels [ACDFi]; p < 0.0001) while the ACDFi patients reported higher preoperative neck VAS scores (mean 3.8 ± 3.0 [miPCD] vs 5.4 ± 2.6 [ACDFi]; p = 0.047). The mean PCS, NDI, neck VAS, and MCS scores were not significantly different with the exception of the MCS score at the short-term follow-up period (mean 46.8 ± 10.6 [miPCD] vs 41.3 ± 10.7 [ACDFi]; p = 0.033). The percentage of patients reporting SCB based on thresholds derived for PCS, NDI, neck VAS, and MCS scores were not significantly different, with the exception of the PCS score at the intermediate follow-up period (52% [miPCD] vs 80% [ACDFi]; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS The current report suggests that the optimal surgical strategy in patients requiring dorsal surgery may be enhanced by the adoption of a minimally invasive surgical approach that appears to result in similar clinical outcomes when compared with a well-accepted strategy of ventral decompression and instrumented fusion. The current results suggest that future comparative effectiveness studies are warranted as the miPCD technique avoids instrumented fusion.

Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a comparative study between percutaneous screw insertion and conventional open technique.

INTRODUCTION: In the last decade, posterior instrumented fusion using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) had been growing in popularity, and its safety and good clinical results have been reported. However, there have been few previous reports of the accuracy of PPS placement compared with that of conventional open screw insertion in an institution. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of PPS placement compared with that of conventional open technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients were treated with posterior instrumented fusion of the thoracic and lumbar spine from April 2008 to July 2013. Four cases of revised instrumentation surgery were excluded. In this study, the pedicle screws inserted below Th7 were investigated, therefore, a total of 455 screws were enrolled. Two hundred and ninety-three pedicle screws were conventional open-inserted screws (O-group) and 162 screws were PPSs (P-group). We conducted a comparative study about the accuracy of placement between the two groups. Postoperative computed tomography scans were carried out to all patients, and the pedicle screw position was assessed according to a scoring system described by Zdichavsky et al. (Eur J Trauma 30:241-247, 2004; Eur J Trauma 30:234-240, 2004) and a classification described by Wiesner et al. (Spine 24:1599-1603, 1999). RESULTS: Based on Zdichavsky's scoring system, the number of grade Ia screws was 283 (96.6 %) in the O-group and 153 (94.4 %) in the P-group, whereas 5 screws (1.7 %) in the O-group and one screw (0.6 %) in the P-group were grade IIIa/IIIb. Meanwhile, the pedicle wall penetrations based on Wiesner classification were demonstrated in 20 screws (6.8 %) in the O-group, and 12 screws (7.4 %) in the P-group. No neurologic complications were observed and no screws had to be replaced in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The PPSs could be ideally inserted without complications. There were no statistically significant differences about the accuracy between the conventional open insertion and PPS placement.

Surgical treatment of Type II odontoid fractures: anterior odontoid screw fixation or posterior cervical instrumented fusion?

Odontoid fractures comprise as many as 20% of all cervical spine fractures. Fractures at the dens base, classified by the Anderson and D'Alonzo system as Type II injuries, are the most common pattern of all odontoid fractures and are also the most common cervical injuries in patients older than 70 years of age. Surgical treatment is recommended for patients older than 50 years with Type II odontoid fractures, as well as in patients at a high risk for nonunion. Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) and posterior cervical instrumented fusion (PCIF) are both well-accepted techniques for surgical treatment but with unique indications and contraindications as well as varied reported outcomes. In this paper, the authors review the literature about specific patients and fracture characteristics that may guide treatment toward one technique over the other. AOSF can preserve atlantoaxial motion, but requires a reduced odontoid, an intact transverse ligament, and a favorable fracture line to achieve adequate fracture compression. Additionally, older patients may have a higher rate of pseudarthrosis using this technique, as well as postoperative dysphagia. PCIF has a higher rate of fusion and is indicated in patients with severe atlantoaxial misalignment and with poor bone quality. PCIF allows direct open reduction of displaced fragments and can reduce any atlantoaxial subluxation. It is also used as a salvage procedure after failed AOSF. However, this technique results in loss of atlantoaxial motion, requires prone positioning, and demands a longer operative duration than AOSF, factors that can be a challenge in patients with severe medical conditions. Although both anterior and posterior approaches are acceptable, many clinical and radiological factors should be taken into account when choosing the best surgical approach. Surgeons must be prepared to perform both procedures to adequately treat these injuries.

Comparison of perioperative complications following staged versus one-day anterior and posterior cervical decompression and fusion crossing the cervico-thoracic junction.

INTRODUCTION: Multilevel cervical pathology may be treated via combined anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) followed by posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF) crossing the cervico-thoracic junction. The purpose of the study was to compare perioperative complication rates following staged versus same day ACDF combined with PSIF crossing the cervico-thoracic junction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing ACDF followed by PSIF crossing the cervico-thoracic junction at a single institution was performed. Patients underwent either same day (group A) or staged with one week interval surgeries (group B). The minimum follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (14 females and 21 males) were analyzed. The average age was 60 years (37-82 years). There were 12 patients in group A and 23 in group B. Twenty-eight complications noted in 14 patients (40%) included: dysphagia in 13 (37%), dysphonia in 6 (17%), post-operative reintubation in 4 (11%), vocal cords paralysis, delirium, superficial incisional infection and cerebrospinal fluid leakage each in one case. Significant differences comparing group A vs. B were found in: the number of levels fused posteriorly (5 vs. 7; p=0.002), total amount of intravenous fluids (3233ml vs. 4683ml; p=0.03), length of hospital stay (10 vs. 18 days; p=0.03) and transfusion of blood products (0 vs. 9 patients). Smoking and cervical myelopathy were the most important risk factors for perioperative complications regardless of the group. CONCLUSIONS: Staging anterior cervical decompression and fusion with posterior cervical instrumented fusion 1 week apart does not decrease the incidence of perioperative complications.

The role of minimally invasive surgery within a multidisciplinary approach for patients with metastatic spine disease over a decade: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic spine disease (MSD) occurs commonly in cancer patients causing pain, spinal instability, devastating neurological compromise, and decreased quality of life. Oncological patients are often medically complex and frail, precluding them form invasive procedures. To address this issue, minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) techniques are desirable. The aim of this study is to review published peer-reviewed literature and ongoing clinical trials to provide current state of the art. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, assessing MISS in MSD patients for the period 2013-2023. Innovations under development were assessed by querying and reviewing data from currently enrolling U.S. registered clinical trials. RESULTS: From 3,696 articles, 50 studies on 3,196 patients focused on spinal oncology MISS. The most commonly reported techniques were vertebral augmentation (VA), percutaneous spinal instrumentation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Surgical instrumentation/stabilization techniques were reported in 10/50 articles for a total of 410 patients. The majority of studies focused on pain as a primary outcome measure, with 28/50 studies reporting a significant improvement in pain following intervention. In the United States, 13 therapeutic trials are currently recruiting MSD patients. Their main focus includes radiosurgery, VA and/or RFA, and laser interstitial thermal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Due to their medical complexity and increased fragility, MSD patients may benefit from minimally invasive approaches. These strategies are effective at mitigating pain and preventing neurological deterioration, while providing other advantages including ease to start/resume systemic/radiotherapy treatment(s).

Comparing opioid utilization and costs for surgical management of single-level spondylolisthesis: A national claims database analysis.

Introduction: The rise in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) cases has led to a significant increase in fusion surgeries, which incur substantial hospitalization costs and often necessitate chronic opioid use for pain management. Recent evidence suggests that single-level low-grade DLS outcomes are comparable whether a fusion procedure or decompression alone is performed, sparking debate over the cost-effectiveness of these procedures, particularly with the advent of minimally invasive techniques reducing the morbidity of fusion. This study aims to compare chronic opioid utilization and associated costs between decompression alone and decompression with instrumented fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Material and methods: Using data from the PearlDiver database, a retrospective database analysis was conducted. We analyzed records of Medicare and Medicaid patients undergoing lumbar fusion or decompression from 2010 to 2022. Patient cohorts were divided into decompression alone (DA) and decompression with instrumented fusion (DIF). Chronic opioid use, pain clinic visits, and total costs were compared between the two groups at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years post-surgery. Theory: Does DIF offer a more cost-effective approach to managing DLS in terms of chronic opioid use in single-level DLS patients. Results: The study revealed comparable chronic opioid use and pain clinic visits between DA and DIF groups at 90 days and 1 year. However, total costs associated with opioid prescriptions as well as surgical aftercare were significantly higher in the DIF group at 90 days (p < 0.05), 1 year (p < 0.05), and 2 years (p < 0.05) post-surgery compared to the DA group. Conclusions: This study highlights the higher costs associated with DIF up to 2 years post-surgery despite comparable symptom improvement when compared to DA and DIF at the 1-year interval. DA emerges as a more financially favorable option, challenging the notion of fusion's cost-offsetting benefits. While further investigation is needed to understand underlying cost drivers and optimize outcomes, our findings emphasize the necessity of integrating clinical and economic factors in the management of single-level DLS.

Machine learning approach to predict venous thromboembolism among patients undergoing multi-level spinal posterior instrumented fusion.

Background: The absence of consensus for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in spine surgery underscores the importance of identifying patients at risk. This study incorporated machine learning (ML) models to assess key risk factors of VTE in patients who underwent posterior spinal instrumented fusion. Methods: Data was collected from the IBM MarketScan Database [2009-2021] for patients ≥18 years old who underwent spinal posterior instrumentation (3-6 levels), excluding traumas, malignancies, and infections. VTE incidence (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) was recorded 90-day post-surgery. Risk factors for VTE were investigated and compared through several ML models including logistic regression, linear support vector machine (LSVM), random forest, XGBoost, and neural networks. Results: Among the 141,697 patients who underwent spinal fusion with posterior instrumentation (3-6 levels), the overall 90-day VTE rate was 3.81%. The LSVM model demonstrated the best prediction with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68. The most important features for prediction of VTE included remote history of VTE, diagnosis of chronic hypercoagulability, metastatic cancer, hemiplegia, and chronic renal disease. Patients who did not have these five key risk factors had a 90-day VTE rate of 2.95%. Patients who had an increasing number of key risk factors had subsequently higher risks of postoperative VTE. Conclusions: The analysis of the data with different ML models identified 5 key variables that are most closely associated with VTE. Using these variables, we have developed a simple risk model with additive odds ratio ranging from 2.80 (1 risk factor) to 46.92 (4 risk factors) over 90 days after posterior spinal fusion surgery. These findings can help surgeons risk-stratify their patients for VTE risk, and potentially guide subsequent chemoprophylaxis.

Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion in Elderly Patients With a Single Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life.

Introduction Treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) is a factor that affects the quality of life and should be considered during management. In patients with a single OVF and neurologic deficit, surgical procedures aiming at neural decompression with instrumented fusion should be considered in elderly individuals. Posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) constitutes a largely performed fusion surgery for patients featuring indications for fusion surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the safety, effectiveness, and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of PLF surgery in elderly patients diagnosed with a single OVF. Methods This study was conducted at Interbalkan European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece. Eighty (80) consecutive individuals with OVFs were subjected to PLF and recruited in this prospectively designed non-randomized study. Clinical evaluation was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at particular chronic intervals at one, three, six, and 12 months and two years. The assessment was conducted via the standardized Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Medical Health Survey Questionnaire for pain and HRQoL, respectively. Results No major perioperative complications were observed. All parameters of SF-36 presented significant improvement over the entire follow-up period with VAS scores reaching a plateau at six months. Depicted improvement of these parameters proves the beneficial role of PLF in elderly patients who suffered from a single OVF with or without referable neurological deficit. Conclusion OVFs have a significant impact on the quality of life of elderly patients, and surgical treatment with PLF with or without decompression can lead to functional recovery, pain relief, and HRQoL amelioration. Our results demonstrated that the outcomes of PLF in the surgical treatment of these patients are remarkably favorable, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of the technique.

Incidence and Predictive Factors of New Onset Postoperative Sacroiliac Joint Pain After Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.

Introduction: To explore the incidence and predictive factors of new onset postoperative sacroiliac joint pain (PSJP) after posterior lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar disease. Methods: Three hundred and sixty-seven patient medical records from January 2020 to December 2021 were retrieved. The patients were divided into two groups: PSJP group and N-PSJP (non-postoperative sacroiliac joint pain group). To investigate potential risk factors for PSJP, HU value (Hounsfield unit value) was assessed on CT scans. ImageJ software was used to assess the fat and muscle of the lumbar multifidus muscle (LMM) in the axial MRI image, the red area was marked as fat and the rest were muscles to calculate the ratio of fatty infiltration. Patient characteristics, surgical variables and radiographic parameters were analyzed statistically. Results: Twenty of 367 patients were diagnosed with PJSP at postoperative follow-up. Patients with PSJP presented with significantly higher HU value. For surgical variables, PSJP patients received more operations including distal fusion level at sacrum than the N-PSJP group. For radiographic parameters, most of the patients in the PSJP group had more severe fatty atrophic muscle in the LMM compared to the N-PSJP group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in preoperative and postoperative lumbar lordosis (LL), angle of lumbar lordosis of fixed lumbar vertebrae (FV-LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacrum slope (SS). The bivariate logistic regression model revealed preoperative fat infiltration rate of the LMM, and higher HU value were independently associated with PSJP. Conclusion: PSJP for degenerative lumbar disease was 5.4%, the predictive factors included preoperative severe infiltration of LMM, distal fusion level at sacrum and higher HU value.