Evolving standards of care and new challenges in the management of HER2-positive breast cancer.

The management of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved over the last 20 years. Major advances have led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of 7 HER2-targeted therapies for the treatment of early-stage and/or advanced-stage disease. Although oncologic outcomes continue to improve, most patients with advanced HER2-positive BC ultimately die of their disease because of primary or acquired resistance to therapy, and patients with HER2-positive early BC who have residual invasive disease after preoperative systemic therapy are at a higher risk of distant recurrence and death. The concept of treatment de-escalation and escalation is increasingly important to optimally tailor therapy for patients with HER2-positive BC and is a major focus of the current review. Research efforts in this regard are discussed as well as updates regarding the evolving standard of care in the (neo)adjuvant and metastatic settings, including the use of novel combination therapies. The authors also briefly discuss ongoing challenges in the management of HER2-positive BC (eg, intrinsic vs acquired drug resistance, the identification of predictive biomarkers, the integration of imaging techniques to guide clinical practice), and the treatment of HER2-positive brain metastases. Research aimed at superseding these challenges will be imperative to ensure continued progress in the management of HER2-positive BC going forward.

Barriers to resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A national and local perspective.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) use for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has increased, but some patients never get resection following NAC. METHODS: Data from January 2012 to December 2019 for all clinically resectable patients across two health networks were utilized, as well as data from the ACS NCDB registry. Univariate testing, multivariable logistic regression, and survival analyses were employed to evaluate failure to resection after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 10 007 registry patients eligible for resection, the resected group was younger (64.6 vs. 69.5 years; p < 0.001) and had a slightly lower mean comorbidity index (0.41 vs. 0.45; p < 0.001) than the nonsurgical group. The nonsurgical group was composed of a higher percentage of Black and Hispanic patients (17.5 vs. 13.1%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for age and comorbidities, the factors associated with decreased probability of resection after NAC were evaluation at a community hospital (OR 2.4), Black or Hispanic race (OR 1.6), areas of increased high school drop-out rates (OR 1.4), and lack of private health insurance (OR 1.3). The median overall survival for nonsurgery was markedly worse than the surgical cohort (10.6 vs. 26.6 months; p < 0.001). The most frequent reasons for a lack of definitive resection were operative upstaging to unresectable (39.6%), patient preference (14.5%), progression on NAC (13.2%), deconditioning or comorbidity severity (12.5%), and nonreferral to a surgeon (8.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Racial, economic, and educational disparities have a considerable influence on the successful completion of a neoadjuvant approach for resectable PDAC. A comprehensive closed or highly collaborative/communicative multidisciplinary neoadjuvant program is optimal for treatment success and completion.

ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on the management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC).

The management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) is a relatively rare indication and an area where no or little evidence is available since randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted. In general, advances related to breast cancer (BC) treatment outside pregnancy cannot always be translated to PrBC, because both the interests of the mother and of the unborn should be considered. Evidence remains limited and/or conflicting in some specific areas where the optimal approach remains controversial. In 2022, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on this topic to gain insights from a multidisciplinary group of experts and develop statements on controversial topics that cannot be adequately addressed in the current evidence-based ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The aim of this consensus-building process was to discuss controversial issues relating to the management of patients with PrBC. The virtual meeting included a multidisciplinary panel of 24 leading experts from 13 countries and was chaired by S. Loibl and F. Amant. All experts were allocated to one of four different working groups. Each working group covered a specific subject area with two chairs appointed: Planning, preparation and execution of the consensus process was conducted according to the ESMO standard operating procedures.

Endoluminal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Accurate rectal tumor staging guides the choice of treatment options. EUS and MRI are the main modalities for staging. AIM OF THE WORK: To compare the performance of EUS and MRI for loco-regional staging of anorectal cancer after neo-adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Seventy-three (37 male, 36 female) patients with rectal cancer after neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were enrolled. Histopathological staging after surgery were used as reference for comparing the yield of loco-regional staging for EUS and MRI. EUS and MRI were done 1 month after completion of neo-adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Regarding post-surgical T staging, eight patients had early tumor (T2 = 16 and T1 = 9) and thirty six were locally advanced (T3 = 36), while N staging, forty patients with negative nodes and 33 were positive (N1 = 22 and N2 = 11). Comparing EUS to MRI, it showed a higher sensitivity (95.7% vs. 78.7%), specificity (84.6% vs. 68.0%) and accuracy (91.8% vs. 75.3%) for staging early and locally advanced tumor. Also, it had a higher sensitivity (78.8% vs. 69.7%), specificity (75.0% vs. 65.0%) and accuracy (76.7% vs. 67.1%) for detection of lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: EUS appears to be more accurate than MRI in loco-regional staging of rectal carcinoma after neo-adjuvant therapy.

Comparison of pulmonary function changes between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized and controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Adequate pulmonary function is important for patients undergoing surgical resection of esophageal cancer, especially those that received neoadjuvant therapy. However, it is unknown if pre-operative radiation affects pulmonary function differently compared to chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in pulmonary function between patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Between March 2017 and March 2018, esophageal cancer patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) before MIE. All patients received pulmonary function testing before and after the neoadjuvant therapy. Changes in pulmonary function, operative data, and pulmonary complications were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were randomized and underwent MIE after receiving CT (n = 34) or CRT (n = 37). Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. The CRT group experienced a greater decrease of forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) (2.66 to 2.18 L, p = 0.023) and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide divided by the mean alveolar volume (DLCO/Va) (17.3%, p < 0.001) than the CT group (FEV1 2.53 to 2.41 L; DLCO/Va 4.8%). The incidence of pulmonary complications was higher in the CRT group (13.51 vs. 8.82%), but the difference was not significant (p = 0.532). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative CRT affects pulmonary function more than CT alone, but does not increase the risk of pulmonary complications in patients undergoing MIE.

Circulating Small EVs miRNAs as Predictors of Pathological Response to Neo-Adjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients.

Neo-adjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly used in the clinic for the treatment of breast cancer (BC). Pathological response to NAT has been associated with improved patients' survival; however, the current techniques employed for assessing the tumor response have significant limitations. Small EVs (sEVs)-encapsulated miRNAs have emerged as promising new biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction. Therefore, our study aims to explore the predictive value of these miRNAs for the pathological response to NAT in BC. By employing bioinformatic tools, we selected a set of miRNAs and evaluated their expression in plasma sEVs and BC biopsies. Twelve miRNAs were identified in sEVs, of which, miR-21-5p, 221-3p, 146a-5p and 26a-5p were significantly associated with the Miller-Payne (MP) pathological response to NAT. Moreover, miR-21-5p, 146a-5p, 26a-5p and miR-24-3p were independent as predictors of MP response to NAT. However, the expression of these miRNAs showed no correlation between sEVs and tissue samples, indicating that the mechanisms of miRNA sorting into sEVs still needs to be elucidated. Functional analysis of miRNA target genes and drug interactions revealed that candidate miRNAs and their targets, can be regulated by different NAT regimens. This evidence supports their role in governing the patients' therapy response and highlights their potential use as prediction biomarkers.

Influences on pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Pathologic complete response is associated with longer disease-free survival and better overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. We, therefore, evaluated factors influencing pathologic complete response. METHODS: Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 2015 to 2018 at the Saarland University Hospital were included. Patients' age, tumor stage, tumor biology, genetic mutation, recurrent cancer, discontinuation of chemotherapy, and participation in clinical trials were extracted from electronic medical records. Binary logistic regression was performed to evaluate the influence of these factors on pathologic complete response. RESULTS: Data of 183 patients were included. The median patient's age was 54 years (22-78). The median interval between diagnosis and onset of chemotherapy was 28 days (14-91); between end of chemotherapy and surgery 28 days (9-57). Sixty-two patients (34%) participated in clinical trials for chemotherapy. A total of 86 patients (47%) achieved pathologic complete response. Patient's age, genetic mutation, recurrent cancers, or discontinuation of chemotherapy (due to side effects) and time intervals (between diagnosis and onset of chemotherapy, as well as between end of chemotherapy and surgery) did not influence pathologic complete response. Patients with high Ki67, high grading, Her2 positive tumors, as well as patients participating in clinical trials for chemotherapy had a higher chance of having pathologic complete response. Patients with Luminal B tumors had a lower chance for pathologic complete response. CONCLUSION: Particularly patients with high risk cancer and patients, participating in clinical trials benefit most from chemotherapy. Therefore, breast cancer patients can be encouraged to participate in clinical trials for chemotherapy.

Time from Completion of Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy to Surgery: Effects on Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients.

There is no consensus on the ideal time interval between the completion of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and definitive surgery for patients with breast cancer. This study sought to determine the ideal time interval from completion of systemic therapy to surgery in an attempt to define a best practice. A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing NAC for Stage I-III breast cancer from 1998-2010 was undertaken. Analysis of all demographic and clinical information was performed, with emphasis on interval from completion of systemic therapy to definitive surgical management. Three hundred and eighty eight patients met the inclusion criteria with a median age of 50 (61.9% white, 33.8% black and 4.3% other). Overall, 2.8% of patients were Stage I, 57.2% Stage II and 40% Stage III. Median follow-up was 85 months. Pathologic response to systemic therapy was complete in 20.6%, partial in 67.8% and no response or progression in 11.6%; responders (pCR or pPR) were noted to have significantly improved Disease free survival (DFS) and Overall survival (OS). Patients undergoing surgical intervention 4-6 weeks after completion of NAC were noted to have a trend towards improved DFS and OS on multivariable analysis. These findings were also observed in the nonlinear relationship between survival risk and surgery time window using martingale residual plots. Timing of surgical intervention following the receipt of NAC may not appear to affect DFS or OS.

Lymph node ratio as best prognostic factor in triple-negative breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Although lymph node status (ypN) is one of the most important prognostic factors of survival, the lymph node ratio (LNR) has emerged as an equitable factor. We aimed to compare the prognostic value of both ypN and LNR in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This was a retrospective cohort study of patients treated in a tertiary care center during the period 2000-2014. We stratified the population based on LNR (≤0.20, 0.20-0.65, and >0.65) and ypN (N1, N2, and N3) status. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank + test. We further compared patient mortality and disease recurrence using multivariate Cox regression analysis. We evaluated 169 patients with a median follow-up of 87 months. At 2 years of follow-up, patients with low-risk LNR compared to those with moderate and high risk had a higher PFS (54% vs 31% vs 18%, respectively; P < .001) and OS (74% vs 64% vs 45%, respectively; P < .001). Moreover, ypN1 patients compared to ypN2 and ypN3 showed similar results in PFS (53% vs 35% vs 19%, respectively; P = .001) and OS (73% vs 69% vs 43%, respectively; P < .001). Compared to the low-risk population, patients with moderate (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-8.71) and high risk (HR: 6.90; 95% CI: 2.29-20.77) had a worse PFS. Regarding OS, moderate-risk (HR: 2.85; 95% CI: 1.10-7.38) and high-risk patients (HR: 6.48; 95% CI: 2.13-19.76) showed considerably worse outcomes. On the other hand, ypN staging was not associated with PFS or OS in the multivariate analysis. The LNR is a better prognostic factor of survival than ypN. The LNR should be considered in the stratification of risk after NAC in patients with TNBC.

Predictors of mastectomy in breast cancer patients with complete remission of primary tumor after neoadjuvant therapy: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) should increase the rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients, especially in those achieving tumor shrinkage. Still, the conversion from a pre-planned mastectomy to BCS in patients responding to NAT is not a widespread standard. We aimed to identify factors influencing surgical choices in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of BC patients with complete remission of primitive tumor (ypT0) after NAT, treated with BCS or mastectomy in two Italian breast units. Predictors of mastectomy were explored using logistic regression. Distant recurrence and event-free survival were assessed in the BCS and mastectomy cohort. RESULTS: 243 patients were included, 147 (60.5 %) treated with BCS and 96 (39.5 %) treated with mastectomy. In the mastectomy group, there were more centrally-located, multiple and larger tumors. At univariate regression analysis, central location, baseline tumor extension on ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), multiple foci and clinical stage were significantly associated with the chance of receiving mastectomy. At multivariate analysis, only baseline focality on US and extension on MRI retained significance as predictors of mastectomy. Distant recurrence and event-free survival were significantly longer in patients undergoing BCS. CONCLUSION: Baseline tumor extension and focality were the main predictors of mastectomy in patients with ypT0 after NAT. However, BCS did not negatively affect survival outcomes in our cohort. An effort should be made to avoid potentially unnecessary mastectomy in this population, aiming at minimizing surgery-associated toxicities and improving patients' quality of life.

Tumor-Resident Microbiota-Based Risk Model Predicts Neoadjuvant Therapy Response of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.

Few predictive biomarkers exist for identifying patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). The intratumoral microbial composition is comprehensively profiled to predict the efficacy and prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent NAT and curative esophagectomy. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis is conducted to screen for the most closely related microbiota and develop a microbiota-based risk prediction (MRP) model on the genera of TM7x, Sphingobacterium, and Prevotella. The predictive accuracy and prognostic value of the MRP model across multiple centers are validated. The MRP model demonstrates good predictive accuracy for therapeutic responses in the training, validation, and independent validation sets. The MRP model also predicts disease-free survival (p = 0.00074 in the internal validation set and p = 0.0017 in the independent validation set) and overall survival (p = 0.00023 in the internal validation set and p = 0.11 in the independent validation set) of patients. The MRP-plus model basing on MRP, tumor stage, and tumor size can also predict the patients who can benefit from NAT. In conclusion, the developed MRP and MRP-plus models may function as promising biomarkers and prognostic indicators accessible at the time of diagnosis.

Trifluridine/Tipiracil Based Chemoradiation in locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: The Phase I/II TARC Trial.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing functional outcomes and securing long-term remissions are key goals in managing patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. In this proof-of-concept study, we set out to further optimize neoadjuvant therapy by integrating the radiosensitizer trifluridine/tipiracil and explore the potential of cell free tumor DNA (ctDNA) to monitor residual disease. METHODS: About 10 patients were enrolled in the phase I dose finding part which followed a 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Tipiracil/trifluridine was administered concomitantly to radiotherapy. ctDNA monitoring was performed before and after chemoradiation with patient-individualized digital droplet PCRs. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at the maximum tolerated dose level of 2 × 35 mg/m² trifluridine/tipiracil. There were 9 grade 3 adverse events, of which 8 were hematologic with anemia and leukopenia. Chemoradiation yielded a pathological complete response in 1 out of 8 assessable patients, downstaging in nearly all patients, and 1 clinical complete response referred for watchful waiting. Three of 4 assessable patients with residual tumor cells at pathological assessment remained liquid biopsy positive after chemoradiation, but 1 turned negative. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory phase I trial, the novel combination of neoadjuvant trifluridine/tipiracil and radiotherapy proved to be feasible, tolerable, and effective. However, the application of liquid biopsy as a potential marker for therapeutic de-escalation in the neoadjuvant setting requires additional research and prospective validation. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04177602.

Different approaches to target volume definition and boost delivery in surgery de-escalation clinical trial in breast cancer patients with pathological complete response.

PURPOSE: We evaluate various approaches to target volume definition and boost delivery in patients with complete response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) who were treated by radiotherapy without a surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pathological complete response (pCR) was diagnosed in 21 of 27 patients included in "surgery de-escalation" prospective observation study. Clips were placed in the primary tumor volume (PrTV) before NST and during the vacuum aspiration biopsy. Twenty patients with pCR underwent the whole breast irradiation and a boost to the PrTV. High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) was the basic technique for boost delivery. Finally, we identified the value of fused images (computed tomography [CT] before NST with simulation CT), clips and their combination for an accurate boost delivery. RESULTS: A complete overlap between PrTV on pre-treatment CT with the localization of the clips on simulation CT was mentioned in 10, partial mismatch in three patients. In 12 of these 13 women, HDRB was successfully used for the boost delivery. In five cases we mentioned a marked discrepancy between the PrTV on fused images and the topography of the clips. In other two women we did not find clips on simulation CT. The fused images in five of these seven patients showed anatomical landmarks (scar, fibrosis) used for identification of the gross tumor volume. In all 20 women with pCR (average follow-up of 16.6 months), there were no locoregional recurrences. CONCLUSION: Combination of the clips with fusion of pre-NST and simulation CTs is important for an accurate boost delivery.

Whole exome analysis reveals the genomic profiling related to chemo-resistance in Chinese population with limited-disease small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The mechanism of chemo-resistance in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is unclear. This study aims to explore the resistance-related genomic profiles of residual tumors after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in SCLC through the whole-exome sequencing (WES). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 416 limited diseases (LD) SCLC patients underwent surgery were retrospectively analyzed, of which 40 patients received NAC. Then we selected 29 patients undergoing NAC (n = 19) and chemotherapy naïve (CTN, n = 10) to perform WES sequence with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples including tumor and paired para-tumor. RESULTS: In total, single nucleotide variation and mutation rate were similar between NAC and CTN groups. The mutation signatures were significantly discrepant between NAC and CTN groups, as well as among patients with partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease. There were more copy number variation deletions in NAC group compared with CTN group. The inactivation of TP53 and RB1 were the most significantly events in both NAC and CTN groups. RB1 nonsense mutations were recurrent in NAC group (9/19 vs. 0/9, 47.4% vs. 0%) with favorable survival, while the frame-shift deletions were frequent in CTN group (3/9 vs. 3/19, 33.3% vs.15.8%). Integrated function enrichment revealed that the frequently mutant genes were involved in cell cycle, metabolic reprogramming, and oncogenic signaling pathways in NAC group, such as BTG2 pathway, glycolysis in senescence and P53 pathway. A total of 27 genes presented frequently mutant in NAC group and might played a positive role in drug resistance. Multiple genes including BRINP3, MYH6, ST18, and PCHD15, which were associated with prognosis, occurred mutant frequently in PR and SD groups. CONCLUSION: Residual tumors after neo-adjuvant therapy exhibited different mutation signature spectrum. Multiple genes including RB1 nonsense mutations, BRINP3, MYH6, ST18, and PCHD15 were with frequent mutation in residual tumors, which might participate chemo-resistance and influenced the prognosis in patients with limited disease SCLC.

Added value of digital FDG-PET/CT in disease staging and restaging in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: We studied the added value of digital FDG-PET/CT in disease staging and restaging compared to the standard work-up with contrast enhanced CT (ceCT) and CA19-9 in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer who received neo-adjuvant therapy. Primary endpoints were tumor response compared to ceCT and CA19.9 as well as the ability to detect distant metastatic disease. METHODS: 35 patients were included in this dual-center prospective study. FDG-PET using digital photon counting technology combined with CT scans were acquired before (T1) and after neo-adjuvant therapy (T2). Patients were staged and restaged based on standard protocol with ceCT and CA 19.9, while all PET/CT scans were stored securely and not included in clinical decision making. After the pancreatic resection, an expert team retrospectively assessed the CT tumor diameter, CA19-9, tumor FDG-uptake, and appearance of metastatic disease of all patients for both time points. RESULTS: CA19-9 levels, CT tumor diameter, and tumor FDG-uptake on PET significantly decreased from T1 to T2 (p = 0.017, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001). The change in FDG-uptake values showed a strong positive correlation with the change in CT tumor diameter and change in CA19-9 (R = 0.75 and R = 0.73, respectively). In addition, small-volume liver lesions were detected on digital PET/CT in 5/35 patients (14%), 4 of which were pathology confirmed at laparotomy. Only one of these five cases was detected on baseline staging ceCT (3%). CONCLUSION: We found that adding digital PET/CT strengthens restaging after neo-adjuvant therapy based on the observed strong correlation with ceCT tumor diameter and Ca19.9. Also, digital PET/CT was found to detect occult metastatic disease not visualized on ceCT, that would have resulted in altered disease staging and therapeutic strategy in a substantial proportion of patients.

Any role for transarterial radioembolization in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the era of advanced systemic therapies?

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is recognized as the second most frequently diagnosed liver malignancy, following closely after hepatocellular carcinoma. Its incidence has seen a global upsurge in the past several years. Unfortunately, due to the lack of well-defined risk factors and limited diagnostic tools, iCCA is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, resulting in a poor prognosis. While surgery is the only potentially curative option, it is rarely feasible. Currently, there are ongoing investigations into various treatment approaches for unresectable iCCA, including conventional chemotherapies, targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and locoregional treatments. This study aims to explore the role of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in the treatment of unresectable iCCA and provide a comprehensive review. The findings suggest that TARE is a safe and effective treatment option for unresectable iCCA, with a median overall survival (OS) of 14.9 months in the study cohort. Studies on TARE for unresectable iCCA, both as a first-line treatment (as a neo-adjuvant down-staging strategy) and as adjuvant therapy, have reported varying median response rates (ranging from 34% to 86%) and median OS (12-16 mo). These differences can be attributed to the heterogeneity of the patient population and the limited number of participants in the studies. Most studies have identified tumor burden, portal vein involvement, and the patient's performance status as key prognostic factors. Furthermore, a phase 2 trial evaluated the combination of TARE and chemotherapy (cisplatin-gemcitabine) as a first-line therapy for locally advanced unresectable iCCA. The results showed promising outcomes, including a median OS of 22 mo and a 22% achievement in down-staging the tumor. In conclusion, TARE represents a viable treatment option for unresectable iCCA, and its combination with systemic chemotherapy has shown promising results. However, it is important to consider treatment-independent factors that can influence prognosis. Further research is necessary to identify optimal treatment combinations and predictive factors for a favorable response in iCCA patients.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update.

CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has updated the guidelines to aid clinicians in evidence-based management of UTUC. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The recommendations provided in these guidelines are based on a review of the literature via a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, (neo)adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, metastatic, immunotherapy, and survival. The results were assessed by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Even though data are accruing, for many areas there is still insufficient high-level evidence to provide strong recommendations. Patient stratification on the basis of histology and clinical examination (including imaging) and assessment of patients at risk of Lynch syndrome will aid management. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk UTUC and two functional kidneys. In particular, for patients with high-risk or metastatic UTUC, new treatment options have become available. In high-risk UTUC, platinum-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant nivolumab for unfit or patients who decline chemotherapy, are options. For metastatic disease, gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Patients with PD-1/PD-L1-positive tumours should be offered a checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab). CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen according to the risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY: Cancer of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, timely and appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.

Key clinical trials in rectal cancer shaping the current treatment paradigms: reference guide for radiologists.

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), which includes chemotherapy and radiation prior to surgical resection, has been recently accepted as the new standard of care for patients with locally advanced low and mid rectal cancers. Multiple clinical trials have evaluated this approach in the last several decades and demonstrated improvement in, local control and reduced risk of recurrence. In addition, in the course of these investigations, it has been shown that between a third and a half of patients experience a clinical complete response (cCR) after being treated with the TNT approach, leading to the development of new organ preservation protocol, now known as watch-and-wait (W&W). On this protocol, cCR patients are not referred for surgery after total neoadjuvant treatment. Instead, they remain on close surveillance and, thus, avoid potential complications associated with surgical resection. Multiple clinical trials are ongoing, investigating the long-term outcomes of these new approaches and the development of less toxic and more effective TNT regimens for LARC. Improvements in technology and rectal MRI protocols position radiologists as vital members of multidisciplinary rectal cancer management teams. Rectal MRI has become a critical tool for rectal cancer initial staging, treatment response assessment, and surveillance on W&W protocols. In this review, we summarize the findings of the pivotal clinical trials that contributed to establishing the current treatment paradigms in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) management, with the intention of helping radiologists play more effective roles in their multidisciplinary teams.

Prospect of neoadjuvant/adjuvant immunotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

China is bearing the growing burden of breast cancer globally, accounting for 18% of all new cases. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is aggressive, prone to early recurrence and metastasis, with a poor prognosis. Improving the prognosis at the early-stage of TNBC remains a challenge, due to the limited efficacy of traditional neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. Early studies revealed that early-stage TNBC is more immunogenic. Several current clinical trials revealed that the combination with immunotherapy in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) expands the treatment options for early-stage TNBC by improving the pathologic complete response (pCR), as well as long-term survival benefits. Correspondingly, Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) updated the breast cancer guidelines to include several recommendations regarding neoadjuvant/adjuvant immunotherapy. However, relevant immunotherapy data in Chinese patients with early-stage TNBC remain scarce. The cTRIO clinical trial (ChiCTR2100041675) is a multicenter phase II trial initiated by investigators to evaluate tislelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin in neoadjuvant/ adjuvant therapy for Chinese patients with TNBC. In this review, we discuss the latest advances in clinical studies of neoadjuvant/adjuvant immunotherapy for early-stage TNBC, as well as potential challenges and strategies to improve the clinical outcomes. We introduce the study design of the cTRIO trial, which aims to make the clinical benefits more robust for early-stage TNBC patients in China.

De-Escalation of Breast Cancer Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Breast cancer treatment has seen many advances in recent decades, lessening the morbidity to patients, while improving outcomes. Central to these gains has been the introduction of breast conserving surgery and neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). There is a considerable interest in further de-escalation of the treatment of breast cancer, which is being studied in several ongoing randomised trials. We aimed to appraise the current literature regarding the various aspects of de-escalation of surgical treatment of breast cancer after NST, and attempt to prognosticate the future course of breast oncotherapy.