RESUMEN
ABSTRACTInjectable antiretroviral treatment (ART) represents a new effective and potentially more convenient alternative to oral ART for people living with HIV (PLWH). This study assessed preferences of PLWH for long-acting injectable compared with oral ART in the Netherlands. A labelled discrete choice experiment presented 12 choice sets of long-acting injectable and oral ART. PLWH were asked to select their preferred ART, described by six attributes: location of administration, dosing frequency, risk of short-term side effects, drug-drug interaction, forgivability, and food and mealtime restrictions. Random parameters logit and latent class models were used to estimate preferences of PLWH. 98.6% of 76 respondents were experienced oral ART users that had taken ART for a median of 12 years (Q1-Q3: 7.0-20.0). 30 (39.5%) respondents chose long-acting injectable ART in all choice tasks and 22 (28.9%) always chose oral ART. The random parameter model showed that, on average, respondents significantly favoured long-acting injectable ART over oral ART, preferred administration of the long-acting injectable ART at home, and a less frequent regimen. The latent class model confirmed one class strongly preferring long-acting injectable ART and one class slightly preferring oral ART. This study highlights the value for both long-acting injectable and oral ART.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Humanos , Países Bajos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Prioridad del Paciente , Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) antibiotics have historically been considered standard of care for treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs). Recent literature has shown sequential oral (PO) therapy to be noninferior to IV antibiotics for certain pathogens and disease states. However, a gap exists in the literature for BSI caused by Enterococcus faecalis. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of definitive sequential PO therapy to definitive IV therapy in patients with E faecalis BSI. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, matched cohort study of adult patients with at least one blood culture positive for E faecalis from January 2017 to November 2022. Patients with polymicrobial BSI, concomitant infections requiring prolonged IV antibiotic therapy, those who did not receive antibiotic therapy, and those who died within 72 hours of index culture were excluded. Subjects were matched based on source of infection in a 2:1 (IV:PO) ratio. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), antibiotic duration, and 30-day readmission rate. RESULTS: Of the 186 patients who met criteria for inclusion, there was no statistically significant difference in the primary composite outcome for PO compared to IV therapy (14.5% vs 21.8%; OR 0.53 [0.23-1.25]) or 30-day readmission (17.5% vs 29%; OR 0.53 [0.25-1.13]). Hospital LOS was significantly longer in patients receiving IV-only therapy (6 days vs 14 days; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Sequential oral therapy for E faecalis BSI had similar outcomes compared to IV-only treatment and may be considered in eligible patients.
RESUMEN
Aim: To compare the effectiveness of in-class transition to all-oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) following parenteral bortezomib (V)-based induction versus continued V-based therapy in US oncology clinics. Patients & methods: Non-transplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) receiving in-class transition to IRd (N = 100; US MM-6), or V-based therapy (N = 111; INSIGHT MM). Results: Following inverse probability of treatment weighting, overall response rate was 73.2% with IRd versus 57.5% with V-based therapy (p < 0.0001). Median duration of treatment was 10.8 versus 5.3 months (p < 0.0001). Overall, 18/24% of patients discontinued IRd/V-based therapy due to adverse events. Conclusion: IRd after V-based induction was associated with significantly improved overall response rate and duration of treatment than continued V-based combination therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: US MM-6: NCT03173092; INSIGHT MM: NCT02761187 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona , Glicina , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Boro/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) with oral treatments has been limited in the past due to the increased risk of adverse effects associated with oral agents. However, in recent years, a shift toward the minimization of adverse effects has been explored. Although existing treatment options like oral corticosteroids and Immunosuppressive therapies have been utilized for acute flare-ups of AD, their long-term use is limited by adverse effects and the need for lab monitoring. New systemic treatment options such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are emerging as a promising therapy, due to their quick onset and antipruritic features. However, the black box warning associated with this medication class requires careful selection of appropriate candidates and patient education despite early favorable safety profiles seen in AD trials. Discussion of other oral agents, like antibiotics and antihistamines, and their role in AD management are also clarified.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Humanos , Administración Oral , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Ceftibuten is an established, oral, third-generation cephalosporin in early clinical development in combination with an oral prodrug of avibactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis. We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftibuten-avibactam against 1,165 Enterobacterales isolates selected from the 2016-2020 ATLAS global surveillance program based upon their ß-lactamase genotype, ß-lactam-susceptible phenotype, species identification, and specimen source (95.8% urine). MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution. Avibactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL. Molecular methods were used to identify ß-lactamase genes. Ceftibuten-avibactam inhibited 90% (MIC90) of ESBL-producing (n = 645), KPC-producing (n = 60), chromosomal AmpC-positive (n = 100), OXA-48-like-producing (n = 50), and acquired AmpC-producing (n = 110) isolates at concentrations of 0.12, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 µg/mL, respectively. At concentrations of ≤1 and ≤8 µg/mL, ceftibuten-avibactam inhibited 98.4 and 99.2% of ESBL-positive isolates; 96.7 and 100% of KPC-positive isolates; 91.0 and 99.0% of chromosomal AmpC-positive isolates; 86.0 and 96.0% of OXA-48-like-positive isolates; and 85.5 and 91.8% of acquired AmpC-positive isolates. Against ESBL-producing, KPC-producing, chromosomal AmpC-positive, OXA-48-like-producing, and acquired AmpC-producing isolates, ceftibuten-avibactam was 256-, 128-, >64-, >32-, and > 16-fold more potent than ceftibuten alone. The potency of ceftibuten-avibactam was 4-fold greater than ceftazidime-avibactam against ESBL-producing (ceftibuten-avibactam MIC90, 0.12 µg/mL; ceftazidime-avibactam MIC90, 0.5 µg/mL) and KPC-producing (0.5 µg/mL; 2 µg/mL) isolates, equivalent to ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC90, 2 µg/mL) against OXA-48-like-producing isolates, 2-fold less active than ceftazidime-avibactam (1 µg/mL; 0.5 µg/mL) against chromosomal AmpC-positive isolates, and 4-fold less active than ceftazidime-avibactam (4 µg/mL; 1 µg/mL) against acquired AmpC-producing isolates. Continued development of ceftibuten-avibactam appears justified.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Gammaproteobacteria , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Ceftibuteno , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Ceftazidima/farmacología , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/farmacología , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Combinación de Medicamentos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad MicrobianaRESUMEN
Beta-hemolytic streptococci are common causes of bloodstream infection (BSI). There is emerging data regarding oral antibiotics for BSI but limited for beta-hemolytic streptococcal BSI. We conducted a retrospective study of adults with beta-hemolytic streptococcal BSI from a primary skin/soft tissue source from 2015 to 2020. Patients transitioned to oral antibiotics within 7 days of treatment initiation were compared to those who continued intravenous therapy, after propensity score matching. The primary outcome was 30-day treatment failure (composite of mortality, infection relapse, and hospital readmission). A prespecified 10% noninferiority margin was used for the primary outcome. We identified 66 matched pairs of patients treated with oral and intravenous antibiotics as definitive therapy. Based on an absolute difference in 30-day treatment failure of 13.6% (95% confidence interval 2.4 to 24.8%), the noninferiority of oral therapy was not confirmed (P = 0.741); on the contrary, the superiority of intravenous antibiotics is suggested by this difference. Acute kidney injury occurred in two patients who received intravenous treatment and zero who received oral therapy. No patients experienced deep vein thrombosis or other vascular complications related to treatment. In patients treated for beta-hemolytic streptococcal BSI, those who transitioned to oral antibiotics by day 7 showed higher rates of 30-day treatment failure than propensity-matched patients. This difference may have been driven by underdosing of oral therapy. Further investigation into optimal antibiotic choice, route, and dosing for definitive therapy of BSI is needed.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Sepsis , Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Propensión , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Streptococcus , Antibacterianos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Tebipenem is an orally bioavailable carbapenem in development for the treatment of patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Herein, we describe the results of studies designed to evaluate tebipenem's potential as an oral (p.o.) transition therapy from intravenous (i.v.) ertapenem therapy for the most common uropathogen, Escherichia coli. These studies utilized a 7-day hollow-fiber in vitro infection model and 5 extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing E. coli challenge isolates. Human free-drug serum concentration-time profiles for tebipenem 600 mg p.o. every 8 h and ertapenem 1 g i.v. every 24 h were simulated in the hollow-fiber in vitro infection model. Samples were collected for bacterial density and drug concentration determination over the 7-day study period. Generally, ertapenem monotherapy resulted in a greater reduction in bacterial density than did tebipenem monotherapy. In the treatment arms in which ertapenem dosing was stopped following dosing for 1 or 3 days, immediate bacterial regrowth occurred and matched that of the growth control. Finally, in the treatment arms in which ertapenem dosing was stopped following dosing for 1 or 3 days and tebipenem dosing was initiated for the remainder of the 7-day study, the intravenous-to-oral transition regimen reduced bacterial burdens and prevented regrowth. Given that transition from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy has been shown to reduce hospital length of stay, nosocomial infection risk, and cost, and improve patient satisfaction, these data demonstrate tebipenem's potential role as an oral transition agent from intravenous antibiotic regimens within the antibiotic stewardship paradigm.
Asunto(s)
Escherichia coli , beta-Lactamas , Humanos , Ertapenem , beta-Lactamas/farmacología , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , beta-LactamasasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common causative microorganism of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO). Although oral antimicrobial therapy with first-generation cephalosporins can treat MSSA infection, data on PVO are scarce. This study evaluated the treatment efficacy of cephalexin as oral antibiotic therapy for MSSA-induced PVO. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients treated with oral cephalexin as the completing treatment for PVO with MSSA bacteremia from 2012 to 2020. Treatment effectiveness of cephalexin was evaluated by comparing improvement (5-point scale; score ≥ 4/5 indicates treatment success) in symptoms and laboratory and imaging results between intravenous antimicrobial and oral cephalexin treatment. RESULTS: Among 15 participants (8 [53%] women; median [interquartile range, IQR], age 75 [67.5-80.5] years; Charlson Comorbidity Index 2 [0-4]), 10 (67%) had lumbar spine lesions, 12 (80%) had spinal abscesses, and 4 (27%) had remote abscesses; no patients had concomitant endocarditis. In 11 patients with normal renal function, cephalexin 1,500-2,000 mg/day was administered. Five patients (33%) underwent surgery. Median (IQR; range) duration (days) of intravenous antibiotics, cephalexin, and total treatment was 36 (32-61; 21-86), 29 (19-82; 8-251), and 86 (59-125; 37-337), respectively. Cephalexin had an 87% treatment success rate without recurrence during a median follow-up of 119 (IQR, 48.5-350) days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MSSA bacteremia and PVO, antibiotic treatment completion with cephalexin is a reasonable option, even in cases with spinal abscess, if at least 3 weeks of effective intravenous antimicrobial therapy is provided.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Osteomielitis , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalexina/uso terapéutico , Meticilina/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus , Absceso , Estudios Retrospectivos , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Ceftibuten-ledaborbactam etzadroxil is a cephalosporin-boronate ß-lactamase inhibitor prodrug combination under development as an oral treatment for complicated urinary tract infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales producing serine ß-lactamases (Ambler class A, C, and D). In vivo, ledaborbactam etzadroxil (formerly VNRX-7145) is cleaved to the active inhibitor ledaborbactam (formerly VNRX-5236). To more completely define the breadth of ceftibuten-ledaborbactam's activity against important antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, we assessed its in vitro activity against phenotypic and genotypic subsets from a 2018-2020 global culture collection of 3,889 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales, including MDR organisms, extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase (ESBL)-positive organisms, and organisms that are nonsusceptible and resistant to other antimicrobials. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using both CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. Ledaborbactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL. ß-Lactamase genes were characterized by PCR followed by Sanger sequencing or whole-genome sequencing for selected ß-lactam-resistant isolate subsets. At ≤1 µg/mL, ceftibuten-ledaborbactam (MIC90, 0.25 µg/mL) inhibited 89.7% of MDR isolates, 98.3% of isolates with a presumptive ESBL-positive phenotype, and 92.6% of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-nonsusceptible, 91.7% of levofloxacin-nonsusceptible, 88.1% of amoxicillin-clavulanate-nonsusceptible, 85.7% of ceftibuten-resistant (MIC >1 µg/mL), and 54.1% of carbapenem-nonsusceptible isolates. Against specific ESBL genotype-positive isolates (AmpC negative, serine carbapenemase negative, and metallo-ß-lactamase negative), ceftibuten-ledaborbactam inhibited 96.3% of CTX-M-9 group (MIC90, 0.25 µg/mL), 91.5% of CTX-M-1 group (MIC90, 0.5 µg/mL), and 88.2% of SHV-positive (MIC90, 2 µg/mL) isolates at ≤1 µg/mL. Against specific serine carbapenemase genotype-positive isolates, ceftibuten-ledaborbactam inhibited 85.9% of KPC-positive (MIC90, 2 µg/mL) and 82.9% of OXA-48-group-positive (MIC90, 2 µg/mL) isolates at ≤1 µg/mL. Continued development of ceftibuten-ledaborbactam appears warranted.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , beta-Lactamasas , Ceftibuteno/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Serina , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/farmacologíaRESUMEN
Ceftibuten/VNRX-7145 is a cephalosporin/boronate ß-lactamase inhibitor combination under development as an oral treatment for complicated urinary tract infections caused by Enterobacterales producing serine ß-lactamases (Ambler class A, C, and D). In vivo, VNRX-7145 (VNRX-5236 etzadroxil) is cleaved to the active inhibitor, VNRX-5236. We assessed the in vitro activity of ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 against 1,066 urinary isolates of Enterobacterales from a 2014-2016 global culture collection. Each isolate tested was preselected to possess a multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype that included nonsusceptibility to amoxicillin-clavulanate and resistance to levofloxacin. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution. VNRX-5236 was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/ml. Ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 inhibited 90% of all isolates tested (MIC90) at 2 µg/ml; MIC90s for ESBL- (n = 566), serine carbapenemase- (n = 116), and acquired AmpC-positive (n = 58) isolate subsets were ≤0.25, >32, and 8 µg/ml, respectively. At concentrations of ≤1, ≤2, and ≤4 µg/ml, ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 inhibited 89.1, 91.7, and 93.1% of all isolates tested; 96.5, 97.7, and 98.4% of ESBL-positive isolates; 75.9, 81.9, and 81.9% of serine carbapenemase-positive isolates; and 70.7, 81.0, and 87.9% of acquired AmpC-positive isolates. Ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 at concentrations of ≤1, ≤2, and ≤4 µg/ml inhibited 85-89, 89-91, and 91-92% of isolates that were not susceptible (defined by CLSI and EUCAST breakpoint criteria) to nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and/or fosfomycin, (as part of their MDR phenotype), oral agents commonly prescribed to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections. The potency of ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 (MIC90, 2 µg/ml) was similar (within one doubling-dilution) to intravenous-only agents ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC90 2 µg/ml) and meropenem-vaborbactam (MIC90 1 µg/ml). Continued investigation of ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones Urinarias , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/farmacología , Ceftibuteno , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/farmacología , beta-Lactamasas/genéticaRESUMEN
LESSONS LEARNED: Treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) typically involves multiple lines of therapy with eventual development of treatment resistance. In this single-arm, phase II study involving heavily pretreated patients, the combination of sorafenib and capecitabine yielded a clinically meaningful progression-free survival of 6.2 months with an acceptable toxicity profile. This oral doublet therapy is worthy of continued investigation for clinical use in patients with mCRC. BACKGROUND: Capecitabine (Cape) is an oral prodrug of the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil. Sorafenib (Sor) inhibits multiple signaling pathways involved in angiogenesis and tumor proliferation. SorCape has been previously studied in metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: This single-arm, phase II study was designed to evaluate the activity of SorCape in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients received Sor (200 mg p.o. b.i.d. max daily) and Cape (1,000 mg/m2 p.o. b.i.d. on days 1-14) on a 21-day treatment cycle. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with preplanned comparison with historical controls. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were treated for a median number of 3.5 cycles (range 1-39). Median PFS was 6.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-7.9) months, and overall survival (OS) was 8.8 (95% CI, 4.3-12.2) months. One patient (2.4%) had partial response (PR), and 22 patients (52.4%) had stable disease (SD) for a clinical benefit rate of 54.8% (95% CI, 38.7%-70.2%). Hand-foot syndrome was the most common adverse event seen in 36 patients (85.7%) and was grade ≥ 3 in 16 patients (38.1%). One patient (2.4%) had a grade 4 sepsis, and one patient (2.4%) died while on treatment. CONCLUSION: SorCape in this heavily pretreated population yielded a reasonable PFS with manageable but notable toxicity. The combination should be investigated further.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Desoxicitidina , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess preferences of women with ovarian cancer regarding features of available anti-cancer regimens for platinum-resistant, biomarker-positive disease, with an emphasis on oral PARP inhibitor and standard intravenous (IV) chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: A discrete-choice-experiment preferences survey was designed, tested, and administered to women with ovarian cancer, with 11 pairs of treatment profiles defined using seven attributes (levels/ranges): regimen (oral daily, IV weekly, IV monthly); probability of progression-free (PFS) at 6 months (40%-60%); probability of PFS at 2 years (10%-20%); nausea (none, moderate); peripheral neuropathy (none, mild, moderate); memory problems (none, mild); and total out-of-pocket cost ($0 to $10,000). RESULTS: Of 123 participants, 38% had experienced recurrence, 25% were currently receiving chemotherapy, and 18% were currently taking a PARP inhibitor. Given attributes and levels, the relative importance weights (sum 100) were: 2-year PFS, 28; cost, 27; 6-month PFS, 19; neuropathy,14; memory problems, nausea, and regimen, all ≤5. To accept moderate neuropathy, participants required a 49% (versus 40%) chance of PFS at 6 months or 14% (versus 10%) chance at 2 years. Given a 3-way choice where PFS and cost were equal, 49% preferred a monthly IV regimen causing mild memory problems, 47% preferred an oral regimen causing moderate nausea, and 4% preferred a weekly IV regimen causing mild memory and mild neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: These findings challenge the assumption that oral anti-cancer therapies are universally preferred by patients and demonstrate that there is no "one size fits all" regimen that is preferable to women with ovarian cancer when considering recurrence treatment regimens.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos de la Memoria/inducido químicamente , Trastornos de la Memoria/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Memoria/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Náusea/diagnóstico , Náusea/psicología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/economía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/psicología , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/economía , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Prioridad del Paciente/economía , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/economía , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OPINION STATEMENT: Intravenous administration of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has been the backbone of treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) for decades. The availability of oral capecitabine has improved the tolerability and simplified combination schedules. In addition to capecitabine, several other oral drugs have proven efficacy, particularly in palliative treatment lines. Clinical guidelines describe several available third-line treatment options for metastatic CRC (mCRC), but few insights are provided to guide the selection and sequence. In this review, we describe the available evidence and most recent data concerning oral drugs with proven efficacy in CRC, including antiangiogenetic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs), inhibitors blocking EGFR/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and modified fluoropyrimidine, and share recommendations and insights on selecting third-line oral therapies for mCRC in China. In general, third-line treatment options for mCRC are mainly regorafenib, fruquintinib, and chemo/targeted therapy reintroduction, while FTD/TPI was rarely used in China probably due to poor accessibility. Fruquintinib is preferred in patients with poor performance status (PS), elder age, and severe organ dysfunction, compared to regorafenib. New drugs of clinical trials were more recommended for the patients with BRAF mutant tumor, and those with good previous treatment efficacy tended to be recommended for chemo/targeted therapy reintroduction. The management of mCRC is evolving, and it must be emphasized that the consideration and recommendations presented here reflect current treatment practices in China and thus might change according to new clinical data as well as the availability of new oral drugs.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Humanos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To analyze the literature on current conservative treatment options for Peyronie's disease (PD). RECENT FINDINGS: Conservative therapy with intralesional collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) is safe and efficacious in either the acute or chronic phases of PD. Combination treatment with penile traction therapy (PTT) can produce even better results. While most PTT devices require extended periods of therapy up to 8 h per day, the RestoreX® device can be effective at 30-90 min per day. A variety of conservative therapies are available for treatment of PD. The available literature does not reveal any treatment benefit of oral therapies. Intralesional therapy is the mainstay conservative treatment of PD. Intralesional CCH therapy is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved intralesional therapy and represents the authors' preference for medical therapy. The most effective conservative management of PD likely requires a combination of therapies.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Colagenasa Microbiana/administración & dosificación , Induración Peniana/terapia , Agentes Urológicos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Aguda , Enfermedad Crónica , Terapia Combinada , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Masculino , Colagenasa Microbiana/uso terapéutico , Induración Peniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Induración Peniana/cirugía , Tracción/métodos , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
This review article focuses on conservative treatment options, topical, intralesional therapy, traction and vacuum therapy. A PubMed database search was performed for studies that were published between 1948 and 2019. Search keywords included "Peyronie's disease," "conservative therapy," "traction treatment," "extracorporeal shock wave therapy," "topical and oral therapies," and "vaccum therapy." Clinical trials in men with Peyronie's disease and scientific articles relating to pharmacologic data were included in the review. When possible, large, randomized, and well-designed trials were selected. Non-English-language articles were excluded.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento con Ondas de Choque Extracorpóreas , Induración Peniana , Tratamiento Conservador , Humanos , Masculino , Induración Peniana/terapiaRESUMEN
We previously discovered suppressor T cell-derived, antigen (Ag)-specific exosomes inhibiting mouse hapten-induced contact sensitivity effector T cells by targeting antigen-presenting cells (APCs). These suppressive exosomes acted Ag-specifically due to a coating of antibody free light chains (FLC) from Ag-activated B1a cells. Current studies are aimed at determining if similar immune tolerance could be induced in cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) to the protein Ag (ovalbumin, OVA). Intravenous administration of a high dose of OVA-coupled, syngeneic erythrocytes similarly induced CD3+CD8+ suppressor T cells producing suppressive, miRNA-150-carrying exosomes, also coated with B1a cell-derived, OVA-specific FLC. Simultaneously, OVA-immunized B1a cells produced an exosome subpopulation, originally coated with Ag-specific FLC, that could be rendered suppressive by in vitro association with miRNA-150. Importantly, miRNA-150-carrying exosomes from both suppressor T cells and B1a cells efficiently induced prolonged DTH suppression after single systemic administration into actively immunized mice, with the strongest effect observed after oral treatment. Current studies also showed that OVA-specific FLC on suppressive exosomes bind OVA peptides suggesting that exosome-coating FLC target APCs by binding to peptide-Ag-major histocompatibility complexes. This renders APCs capable of inhibiting DTH effector T cells. Thus, our studies describe a novel immune tolerance mechanism mediated by FLC-coated, Ag-specific, miRNA-150-carrying exosomes that act on the APC and are particularly effective after oral administration.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos/inmunología , Células Presentadoras de Antígenos/inmunología , Exosomas/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/inmunología , Macrófagos/inmunología , MicroARNs/inmunología , Animales , Antígenos/inmunología , Femenino , Tolerancia Inmunológica/inmunología , Cadenas Ligeras de Inmunoglobulina/inmunología , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Endogámicos CBA , Ratones Noqueados , MicroARNs/genética , Ovalbúmina/inmunología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/metabolismoRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to identify predictors of long-term response to the initiation of basal-supported oral therapy (BOT) with insulin glargine (IGlar-100). Patients from the observational TOP registry were grouped based on those who had achieved (responders) and those who had not achieved (non-responders) their HBA1c target and/or FBG ≤110 mg/dL 12 months after IGlar-100 initiation. Independent predictors of treatment response were identified by regression analysis. Data for 2444 patients were analysed (responders, n = 1610; non-responders, n = 834). Although the IGlar-100 dose increase over 12 months was larger for non-responders (+12.83 vs +9.46 U/d; P < 0.0001), the corresponding decrease in HbA1c was smaller (-0.88% vs -1.57%). Independent predictors of response included lower BMI (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00), lower FBG (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.98) and HbA1c values at baseline (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.18-0.31), a less ambitious HbA1c target (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 3.37-7.63) and bedtime administration of IGlar-100 (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.12-2.14). In conclusion, HbA1c was the clinically most significant baseline characteristic predictive of response to BOT. This may suggest an advantage of IGlar-100 initiation prior to excessive hyperglycaemia escalation.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia/análisis , Índice de Masa Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Insulina Glargina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Ayuno/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Análisis de Regresión , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and inadequate glycaemic control, addition of basal insulin is recommended, but titration and optimization of basal insulin therapy in primary care is not well understood. We conducted an observational trial in 2470 patients with T2DM who initiated insulin glargine 100 U/L (Gla-100) on top of oral antidiabetic drugs. Physicians were free to choose either a "Davies," "Fritsche" or "individual" titration algorithm. We found that fasting blood glucose (FBG) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were effectively reduced by Gla-100; 65.9% of patients achieved the primary endpoint (FBG ≤6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL) or an individual HbA1c target). There were no significant differences in efficacy and safety between the algorithms used. The mean FBG decreased by 3.2 mmol/L (59 mg/dL) over 12 months, while the mean HbA1c decreased by 15.3 mmol/mol (1.4%)%. From a starting dose of 11.7 U/d, the Gla-100 dosage was 22.8 U/d at 12 months, with similar values in each group. Rates of hypoglycaemia were low and did not differ by titration algorithm. We conclude that Gla-100 was effective at reducing FBG and HbA1c, independent of the titration algorithm, but observed that algorithms were inconsistently applied in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Insulina Glargina/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anciano , Algoritmos , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Calibración , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with a progressive deterioration in beta cell function and loss of glycaemic control. Clinical predictors of beta cell failure are needed to guide appropriate therapy. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of a large set of potential predictors of beta cell stress, measured as change in the proinsulin/insulin (PI/I) ratio, was conducted in a cohort of 235 outpatients with T2DM on stable treatment with oral hypoglycaemic agents or diet followed up for ~4 years (median value 3.9 years; interquartile range 3.8-4.1 years). RESULTS: Overall, metabolic control deteriorated over time, with a significant increase in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; P < .0001), proinsulin (P < .0001), and PI/I ratio (P = .001), without significant changes in the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance. Multivariate regression analysis showed that for each 1% (10.9 mmol/mol) increase from baseline in HbA1c, the risk of beta cell stress increased by 3.8 times; for each 1% (10.9 mmol/mol) incremental increase in HbA1c during the study, risk of beta cell stress increased by 2.25 times that at baseline. By contrast, baseline anthropometric and clinical variables, lipid profile, inflammatory markers (PCR, IL-6), non-esterified fatty acids, and current therapies did not independently influence PI/I ratio variation during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with T2DM, beta cell function progressively deteriorated despite current therapies. Among a large set of clinical and biochemical predictors, only baseline HbA1c levels and their deterioration overtime were associated with higher beta cell stress over time.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patología , Células Secretoras de Insulina/fisiología , Estrés Fisiológico/fisiología , Administración Oral , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Células Secretoras de Insulina/patología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/patología , Proinsulina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Onychomycosis is an uncommon condition in childhood, but prevalence in children is increasing worldwide.The objective was to review the efficacy and safety of systemic and topical antifungal agents to treat onychomycosis in children. Databases (Pubmed, OVID, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library) were searched. Seven studies were selected for inclusion. Only one was a randomized controlled trial. In total, 208 children were administered antifungal agents for the treatment of onychomycosis. Four reports of mild adverse events were documented (1.9% of treated children), one of which discontinued treatment (0.5%). Limitations of this review are the lack of randomized controlled trials available in pediatric onychomycosis. These findings suggest that antifungal therapies used to treat onychomycosis in children are associated with a low incidence of adverse events. Current dosing regimens for antifungal drugs are effective and appear safe to use in children, notwithstanding that the Food and Drug Administration has not approved any of these agents for the treatment of onychomycosis in children. To our knowledge, this review is the most up-to-date, comprehensive summary of pediatric onychomycosis treatment.