Do Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) lesions predict holmium laser enucleation of prostate outcomes?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for prostate cancer (PCa) screening and risk stratification and is helpful for surgical planning for patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). There are few studies investigating the correlation between MRI Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) lesion characteristics and HoLEP pathology and outcomes. METHODS: We performed retrospective review of patients who underwent HoLEP between January 2021 and August 2023 by a single surgeon. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics and outcomes were analyzed for all patients who had a documented preoperative prostate MRI. RESULTS: There were 334 patients without a pre-existing diagnosis of PCa and with a preoperative prostate MRI, of which 140 (42%) had at least one PIRADS lesion. There was a total of 203 PIRADS lesions: 91 (45%) in the peripheral zone (PZ), 106 (52%) in the transition zone (TZ), and 6 (2%) not specified. Incidental PCa was noted in 44 (13%) patients at time of HoLEP. Presence or location of lesion was not significantly associated with rate or grade of incidental PCa on pathology. Greater number of lesions and lesion size correlated with longer procedure times. Lesion number, size, or grade were not found to correlate with cancer grade or rate of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Grade, presence, location, size, and number of PIRADS lesions on preoperative prostate MRI for patients with an appropriate prior PCa workup were not significantly associated with incidental PCa or higher PCa grade on HoLEP pathology.

Based on PI-RADS v2.1 combining PHI and ADC values to guide prostate biopsy in patients with PSA 4-20 ng/mL.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of prostate health index (PHI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in predicting prostate cancer (PCa) and construct a nomogram for the prediction of PCa and clinically significant PCa (CSPCa) in Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) three lesions cohort. METHODS: This study prospectively enrolled 301 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) and were scheduled for prostate biopsy. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was performed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of each predictor. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to ascertain hidden risk factors and constructed nomograms in PI-RADS three lesions cohort. RESULTS: In the whole cohort, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of PHI is relatively high, which is 0.779. As radiographic parameters, the AUC of PI-RADS and ADC values was 0.702 and 0.756, respectively. The utilization of PHI and ADC values either individually or in combination significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of the basic model. In PI-RADS three lesions cohort, the AUC for PCa was 0.817 in the training cohort and 0.904 in the validation cohort. The AUC for CSPCa was 0.856 in the training cohort and 0.871 in the validation cohort. When applying the nomogram for predicting PCa, 50.0% of biopsies could be saved, supplemented by 6.9% of CSPCa being missed. CONCLUSION: PHI and ADC values can be used as predictors of CSPCa. The nomogram included PHI, ADC values and other clinical predictors demonstrated an enhanced capability in detecting PCa and CSPCa within PI-RADS three lesions cohort.

The predictive impact of hematological inflammatory markers in detecting prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of suspicious lesions that are classified as PI-RADS 3 in multiparametric prostate magnetic-resonance imaging (mpMRI) is controversial. This study aims to assess the predictive capacity of hematological inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), and systemic immune-response index (SIRI) in detecting prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions. METHODS: 276 patients who underwent mpMRI and subsequent prostate biopsy after PI-RADS 3 lesion detection were included in the study. According to the biopsy results, the patients were distributed to two groups as prostate cancer (PCa) and no cancer (non-PCa). Data concerning age, PSA, prostate volume, PSA density, PI-RADS 3 lesion size, prostate biopsy results, monocyte counts (109/L), lymphocyte counts (109/L), platelet counts (109/L), neutrophils count (109/L) were recorded from the complete blood count. From these data; PIV value is obtained by monocyte × neutrophil × platelet/lymphocyte, NLR by neutrophil/lymphocyte, and SIRI by monocyte number × NLR. RESULTS: Significant variations in neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte levels between PCa and non-PCa patient groups were detected (p = 0.009, p = 0.001, p = 0.005 respectively, p < 0.05). NLR, PIV, and SIRI exhibited significant differences, with higher values in PCa patients (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively, p < 0.05). The area under curve of SIRI was 0.729, with a cut-off value of 1.20 and with a sensitivity 57.70%, and a specificity of 68.70%. CONCLUSION: SIRI outperformed NLR and PIV in detecting PCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions, showcasing its potential as a valuable biomarker. Implementation of this parameter to possible future nomograms has the potential to individualize and risk-stratify the patients in prostate biopsy decision.

Using a novel PSMA-PET and PSA-based model to enhance the diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer and avoid unnecessary biopsy in men with PI-RADS ≤ 3 MRI.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnostic evaluation of men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) yet inconclusive MRI (PI-RADS ≤ 3) presents a common clinical challenge. [68Ga]Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has shown promise in identifying clinically significant PCa (csPCa). We aim to establish a diagnostic model incorporating PSMA-PET to enhance the diagnostic process of csPCa in PI-RADS ≤ 3 men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospective included 151 men with clinical suspicion of PCa and PI-RADS ≤ 3 MRI. All men underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans and ultrasound/MRI/PET fusion-guided biopsies. csPCa was defined as Grade Group ≥ 2. PRIMARY-scores from PSMA-PET scans were evaluated. A diagnostic model incorporating PSMA-PET and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-derived parameters was developed. The discriminative performance and clinical utility were compared with conventional methods. Internal validation was conducted using a fivefold cross-validation with 1000 iterations. RESULTS: In this PI-RADS ≤ 3 cohort, areas-under-the-curve (AUCs) for detecting csPCa were 0.796 (95%CI, 0.738-0.853), 0.851 (95%CI, 0.783-0.918) and 0.806 (95%CI, 0.742-0.870) for PRIMARY-score, SUVmax and routine clinical PSMA-PET assessment, respectively. The diagnostic model comprising PRIMARY-score, SUVmax and serum free PSA/total PSA (fPSA/tPSA) achieved a significantly higher AUC of 0.906 (95%CI, 0.851-0.961) compared to strategies based on PRIMARY-score or SUVmax (P < 0.05) and markedly superior to conventional strategies typically based on PSA density (P < 0.001). The average fivefold cross-validated AUC with 1000 iterations was 0.878 (95%CI, 0.820-0.954). Theoretically, using a threshold of 21.6%, the model could have prevented 78% of unnecessary biopsies while missing only 7.8% of csPCa cases in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: A novel diagnostic model incorporating PSMA-PET derived metrics-PRIMARY-score and SUVmax-along with serum fPSA/tPSA, has been developed and validated. The integrated model may assist clinical decision-making with enhanced diagnostic accuracy over the individual conventional metrics. It has great potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies for men with PI-RADS ≤ 3 MRI results and warrants further prospective and external evaluations.

Weakly Supervised MRI Slice-Level Deep Learning Classification of Prostate Cancer Approximates Full Voxel- and Slice-Level Annotation: Effect of Increasing Training Set Size.

BACKGROUND: Weakly supervised learning promises reduced annotation effort while maintaining performance. PURPOSE: To compare weakly supervised training with full slice-wise annotated training of a deep convolutional classification network (CNN) for prostate cancer (PC). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: One thousand four hundred eighty-nine consecutive institutional prostate MRI examinations from men with suspicion for PC (65 ± 8 years) between January 2015 and November 2020 were split into training (N = 794, enriched with 204 PROSTATEx examinations) and test set (N = 695). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 and 3T, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo and diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging. ASSESSMENT: Histopathological ground truth was provided by targeted and extended systematic biopsy. Reference training was performed using slice-level annotation (SLA) and compared to iterative training utilizing patient-level annotations (PLAs) with supervised feedback of CNN estimates into the next training iteration at three incremental training set sizes (N = 200, 500, 998). Model performance was assessed by comparing specificity at fixed sensitivity of 0.97 [254/262] emulating PI-RADS ≥ 3, and 0.88-0.90 [231-236/262] emulating PI-RADS ≥ 4 decisions. STATISTICAL TESTS: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) was compared using DeLong and Obuchowski test. Sensitivity and specificity were compared using McNemar test. Statistical significance threshold was P = 0.05. RESULTS: Test set (N = 695) ROC-AUC performance of SLA (trained with 200/500/998 exams) was 0.75/0.80/0.83, respectively. PLA achieved lower ROC-AUC of 0.64/0.72/0.78. Both increased performance significantly with increasing training set size. ROC-AUC for SLA at 500 exams was comparable to PLA at 998 exams (P = 0.28). ROC-AUC was significantly different between SLA and PLA at same training set sizes, however the ROC-AUC difference decreased significantly from 200 to 998 training exams. Emulating PI-RADS ≥ 3 decisions, difference between PLA specificity of 0.12 [51/433] and SLA specificity of 0.13 [55/433] became undetectable (P = 1.0) at 998 exams. Emulating PI-RADS ≥ 4 decisions, at 998 exams, SLA specificity of 0.51 [221/433] remained higher than PLA specificity at 0.39 [170/433]. However, PLA specificity at 998 exams became comparable to SLA specificity of 0.37 [159/433] at 200 exams (P = 0.70). DATA CONCLUSION: Weakly supervised training of a classification CNN using patient-level-only annotation had lower performance compared to training with slice-wise annotations, but improved significantly faster with additional training data. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Understanding Spatial Correlation Between Multiparametric MRI Performance and Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has shown a substantial impact on prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. However, the understanding of the spatial correlation between mpMRI performance and PCa location is still limited. PURPOSE: To investigate the association between mpMRI performance and tumor spatial location within the prostate using a prostate sector map, described by Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: One thousand one hundred forty-three men who underwent mpMRI before radical prostatectomy between 2010 and 2022. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T. T2-weighted turbo spin-echo, a single-shot spin-echo EPI sequence for diffusion-weighted imaging, and a gradient echo sequence for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI sequences. ASSESSMENT: Integrated relative cancer prevalence (rCP), detection rate (DR), and positive predictive value (PPV) maps corresponding to the prostate sector map for PCa lesions were created. The relationship between tumor location and its detection/missing by radiologists on mpMRI compared to WMHP as a reference standard was investigated. STATISTICAL TESTS: A weighted chi-square test was performed to examine the statistical differences for rCP, DR, and PPV of the aggregated sectors within the zone, anterior/posterior, left/right prostate, and different levels of the prostate with a statistically significant level of 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 1665 PCa lesions were identified in 1143 patients, and from those 1060 lesions were clinically significant (cs)PCa tumors (any Gleason score [GS] ≥7). Our sector-based analysis utilizing weighted chi-square tests suggested that the left posterior part of PZ had a high likelihood of missing csPCa lesions at a DR of 67.0%. Aggregated sector analysis indicated that the anterior or apex locations in PZ had the significantly lowest csPCa detection at 67.3% and 71.5%, respectively. DATA CONCLUSION: Spatial characteristics of the per-lesion-based mpMRI performance for diagnosis of PCa were studied. Our results demonstrated that there is a spatial correlation between mpMRI performance and locations of PCa on the prostate. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Utility of Prostate Health Index Density for Biopsy Strategy in Biopsy-Naïve Patients With PI-RADS v2.1 Category 3 Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Category 3 lesions in PI-RADSv2.1 pose diagnostic challenges, complicating biopsy decisions. Recent biomarkers like prostate health index (PHI) have shown higher specificity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) than prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Yet their integration with MRI remains understudied. PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of PSA and PHI with its derivatives for detecting csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients with category 3 lesion on initial prostate MRI scan. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: One hundred ninety-three biopsy-naïve patients who underwent MRI, PSA, and PHI testing, followed by both targeted and systematic biopsies. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Turbo spin-echo T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fast field echo sequence imaging in 3 T. ASSESSMENT: PHI density (PHID) and PSA density (PSAD) derived by dividing serum PHI and PSA with prostate volume (MRI based methodology suggested by PI-RADSv2.1). Risk-stratified models to evaluate the utility of markers in triaging patients for biopsy, including low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. STATISTICAL TESTS: Independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Mantel-Haenszel test, generalized estimating equation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used. Statistical significance defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: CsPCa was found in 16.6% (32/193) of patients. PHID had the highest area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.793, followed by PHI of 0.752, PSAD of 0.750, and PSA of 0.654. PHID with two cut-off points (0.88/mL and 1.82/mL) showed the highest potential biopsy avoidance of 47.7% (92/193) with 5% missing csPCa, and the lowest intermediate-risk group (borderline decision group) at 38.9% (75/193), compared to PSA and PHI. DATA CONCLUSION: PHID demonstrated better potential in triaging patients with category 3 lesions, possibly aiding more selective and confident biopsy decisions for csPCa detection, than traditional markers. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Prostagram magnetic resonance imaging in a screening population: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System or Likert?

OBJECTIVE: To compare biopsy recommendation rates and accuracy of the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System, version 2 (PI-RADSv2) with the Likert scale for detection of clinically significant and insignificant prostate cancer in men screened within the Imperial Prostate 1 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial Using Imaging (IP1-PROSTAGRAM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men aged 50-69 years were screened with Prostagram MRI. Scans were prospectively reported using both PI-RADSv2 (excluding dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence score) and 5-point Likert scores by expert uro-radiologists. Systematic and targeted transperineal biopsy was recommended if the scan was scored ≥ 3, based on either reporting system. The proportion of patients recommended for biopsy and detection rates for Grade Groups (GGs) 1 and ≥ 2 were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare performance. RESULTS: A total of 406 men underwent Prostagram MRI. The median (interquartile range) age and prostate-specific antigen level were 57 (53-61) years and 0.91 (0.56-1.74) ng/mL, respectively. At MRI score ≥ 3, more patients were recommended for biopsy based on Likert criteria (94/406; 23%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.2%-27.6%) compared to PI-RADSv2 (72/406; 18%, 95% CI 14.2%-21.9%; P = 0.03). For MRI scores ≥ 4, PI-RADSv2 and Likert scales led to 43/406 (11%, 95% CI 7.9%-14.1%) and 35/406 (9%, 95% CI 6.2%-11.9%) men recommended for biopsy (P = 0.40). For GG ≥ 2 detection, PIRADSv2 and Likert detected 22% (95% CI 11.4%-30.8%, 14/72) and 16% (95% CI 9.5%-25.3%, 15/94), respectively (P = 0.56). For GG1 cancers detection these were 11% (95% CI 4.3%-19.6%, seven of 72) vs 11% (95% CI 4.7%-17.8%, nine of 94; P = 1.00). The accuracy of PI-RADSv2 and Likert scale was similar (area under the ROC curve 0.64 vs 0.65, P = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: In reporting non-contrast-enhanced Prostagram MRI in a screening population, the PI-RADSv2 and Likert scoring systems were equally accurate; however, Likert scale use led to more men undergoing biopsy without a subsequent increase in significant cancer detection rates. To improve reporting of Prostagram MRI, either the PI-RADSv2 or a modified Likert scale or a standalone scoring system should be developed.

Perspectives on technology: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) interobserver variability.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the topic of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) interobserver variability, including a discussion of major sources, mitigation approaches, and future directions. METHODS: A narrative review of PI-RADS interobserver variability. RESULTS: PI-RADS was developed in 2012 to set technical standards for prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), reduce interobserver variability at interpretation, and improve diagnostic accuracy in the MRI-directed diagnostic pathway for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. While PI-RADS has been validated in selected research cohorts with prostate cancer imaging experts, subsequent prospective studies in routine clinical practice demonstrate wide variability in diagnostic performance. Radiologist and biopsy operator experience are the most important contributing drivers of high-quality care among multiple interrelated factors including variability in MRI hardware and technique, image quality, and population and patient-specific factors such as prostate cancer disease prevalence. Iterative improvements in PI-RADS have helped flatten the curve for novice readers and reduce variability. Innovations in image quality reporting, administrative and organisational workflows, and artificial intelligence hold promise in improving variability even further. CONCLUSION: Continued research into PI-RADS is needed to facilitate benchmark creation, reader certification, and independent accreditation, which are systems-level interventions needed to uphold and maintain high-quality prostate MRI across entire populations.

Can we rely on magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and surgical planning? Comprehensive analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing transperineal mapped biopsies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate MRI and histological concordance in prostate cancer (PCa) identification via mapped transperineal biopsies. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective per-lesion analysis of patients undergoing MRI and transperineal biopsy at the Valencian Institute of Oncology (2016-2024) using CAPROSIVO PCa data. Patients underwent MRI, with or without regions of interest (ROI), followed by transperineal biopsies (3-5 cores/ROI, 20-30 systematic). Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated, considering PI-RADS 3 lesions as positive or negative. Gleason Grade Group (GG) > 1 defined clinically significant PCa (csPCa). RESULTS: 1817 lesions were analyzed from 1325 patients (median age 67, median PSA 6.3 ng/ml). 53% MRI were negative, GG > 1 prevalence was 38.4%. MRI-negative cases showed varying PCa rates: 57.4% negative, 30.2% GG 1, and 12.4% GG > 1. PI-RADS 3 lesions had mixed outcomes: 45.6% benign, 13.1% GG 1, and 41.3% GG > 1. 9.2% PI-RADS 4-5 lesions were negative, 9% GG 1, and 81.7% GG > 1. For PI-RADS 3 lesions considered positive, Se, Sp, NPV, PPV, and AUC were 82.9%, 75%, 87.6%, 67.4%, and 0.79 respectively. Considering PI-RADS 3 as negative yielded 64.8% Se, 91% Sp, 80.6% NPV, 81.7% PPV, and 0.78 AUC. CONCLUSION: MRI and mapped prostate biopsies exhibited moderate concordance. MRI could miss up to one in five csPCa foci and misinterpret one in three ROIs. Careful MRI interpretation is crucial for optimizing patient care.

PI-RADS upgrading as the strongest predictor for the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with initial PI-RADS-3 lesions.

PURPOSE: Unclear lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance tomography (mpMRI) are challenging for the indication of biopsy in patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this study is the validation of the detection rate of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in patients with PI-RADS 3 findings and to determine the appropriate follow-up strategy. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, patients with maximum PI-RADS 3 lesions underwent targeted MRI/ultrasound-fusion biopsy (tPbx) combined with systematic 12-core biopsy (sPbx) and follow-up mpMRI with further control biopsy. We assessed the evolution of MRI findings (PI-RADS, volume of the lesion), clinical parameters and histopathology in follow-up MRI and biopsies. The primary objective is the detection rate of csPCa, defined as ISUP ≥ 2 findings. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients (median PSA 6.65 ng/ml; median PSA-density (PSAD) 0.13 ng/ml2) were included. The initial biopsy identified low-risk PCa in 24 cases (19%). During follow-up biopsy, 22.2% of patients showed PI-RADS upgrading (PI-RADS > 3), and 29 patients (23%) exhibited a tumor upgrading. Patients with PI-RADS upgrading had a higher risk of csPCa compared to those without PI-RADS upgrading (42.9% vs. 9.18%, p < 0.05). PI-RADS upgrading was identified as an independent predictor for csPCa in follow-up biopsy (OR 16.20; 95% CI 1.17-224.60; p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Patients with stable PI-RADS 3 findings may not require a follow-up biopsy. Instead, it is advisable to schedule an MRI, considering that PI-RADS upgrading serves as an independent predictor for csPCa.

Development and validation of a novel nomogram to avoid unnecessary biopsy in patients with PI-RADS category ≥ 4 lesions and PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a prediction model for identifying non-prostate cancer (non-PCa) in biopsy-naive patients with PI-RADS category ≥ 4 lesions and PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml to avoid unnecessary biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients who underwent transperineal biopsies at West China Hospital between 2018 and 2022 were included. The patients were randomly divided into training cohort (70%) and validation cohort (30%). Logistic regression was used to screen for independent predictors of non-PCa, and a nomogram was constructed based on the regression coefficients. The discrimination and calibration were assessed by the C-index and calibration plots, respectively. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC) were applied to measure the clinical net benefit. RESULTS: A total of 1580 patients were included, with 634 non-PCa. Age, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and lesion zone were independent predictors incorporated into the optimal prediction model, and a corresponding nomogram was constructed ( https://nomogramscu.shinyapps.io/PI-RADS-4-5/ ). The model achieved a C-index of 0.931 (95% CI, 0.910-0.953) in the validation cohort. The DCA and CIC demonstrated an increased net benefit over a wide range of threshold probabilities. At biopsy-free thresholds of 60%, 70%, and 80%, the nomogram was able to avoid 74.0%, 65.8%, and 55.6% of unnecessary biopsies against 9.0%, 5.0%, and 3.6% of missed PCa (or 35.9%, 30.2% and 25.1% of foregone biopsies, respectively). CONCLUSION: The developed nomogram has favorable predictive capability and clinical utility can help identify non-PCa to support clinical decision-making and reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

PSA-density, DRE, and PI-RADS 5: potential surrogates for omitting biopsy?

OBJECTIVE: In contrast to other malignancies, histologic confirmation prior treatment in patients with a high suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCA) is common. To analyze the impact of extracapsular extension (ECE), cT-stage defined by digital rectal examination (DRE), and PSA-density (PSA-D) on detection of csPCA in patients with at least one PI-RADS 5 lesion (hereinafter, "PI-RADS 5 patients"). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PI-RADS 5 patients who underwent MRI/Ultrasound fusion biopsy (Bx) between 2016 and 2020 were identified in our institutional database. Uni- and multivariable logistic-regression models were used to identify predictors of csPCA-detection (GGG ≥ 2). Risk models were adjusted for ECE, PSA-D, and cT-stage. Corresponding Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: Among 493 consecutive PI-RADS 5 patients, the median age and PSA was 69 years (IQR 63-74) and 8.9 ng/ml (IQR 6.0-13.7), respectively. CsPCA (GGG ≥ 2) was detected in 405/493 (82%); 36/493 patients (7%) had no cancer. When tabulating for PSA-D of > 0.2 ng/ml/cc and > 0.5 ng/ml/cc, csPCA was found in 228/253 (90%, PI-RADS5 + PSA-D > 0.2 ng/ml/cc) and 54/54 (100%, PI-RADS5 + PSA-D > 0.5 ng/ml/cc). Finally, a model incorporating PSA-D and cT-stage achieved an AUC of 0.79 (CI 0.74-0.83). CONCLUSION: In PI-RADS 5 patients, PSA-D and cT-stage emerged as strong predictors of csPCA at biopsy. Moreover, when adding the threshold of PSA-D > 0,5 ng/ml/cc, all PI-RADS 5 patients were diagnosed with csPCA. Therefore, straight treatment for PCA can be considered, especially if risk-factors for biopsy-related complications such as obligatory dual platelet inhibition are present.

PI-RADS Version 2.0 Versus Version 2.1: Comparison of Prostate Cancer Gleason Grade Upgrade and Downgrade Rates From MRI-Targeted Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND. Precise risk stratification through MRI/ultrasound (US) fusion-guided targeted biopsy (TBx) can guide optimal prostate cancer (PCa) management. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare PI-RADS version 2.0 (v2.0) and PI-RADS version 2.1 (v2.1) in terms of the rates of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) upgrade and downgrade from TBx to radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS. This study entailed a retrospective post hoc analysis of patients who underwent 3-T prostate MRI at a single institution from May 2015 to March 2023 as part of three prospective clinical trials. Trial participants who underwent MRI followed by MRI/US fusion-guided TBx and RP within a 1-year interval were identified. A single genitourinary radiologist performed clinical interpretations of the MRI examinations using PI-RADS v2.0 from May 2015 to March 2019 and PI-RADS v2.1 from April 2019 to March 2023. Upgrade and downgrade rates from TBx to RP were compared using chi-square tests. Clinically significant cancer was defined as ISUP GG2 or greater. RESULTS. The final analysis included 308 patients (median age, 65 years; median PSA density, 0.16 ng/mL2). The v2.0 group (n = 177) and v2.1 group (n = 131) showed no significant difference in terms of upgrade rate (29% vs 22%, respectively; p = .15), downgrade rate (19% vs 21%, p = .76), clinically significant upgrade rate (14% vs 10%, p = .27), or clinically significant downgrade rate (1% vs 1%, p > .99). The upgrade rate and downgrade rate were also not significantly different between the v2.0 and v2.1 groups when stratifying by index lesion PI-RADS category or index lesion zone, as well as when assessed only in patients without a prior PCa diagnosis (all p > .01). Among patients with GG2 or GG3 at RP (n = 121 for v2.0; n = 103 for v2.1), the concordance rate between TBx and RP was not significantly different between the v2.0 and v2.1 groups (53% vs 57%, p = .51). CONCLUSION. Upgrade and downgrade rates from TBx to RP were not significantly different between patients whose MRI examinations were clinically interpreted using v2.0 or v2.1. CLINICAL IMPACT. Implementation of the most recent PI-RADS update did not improve the incongruence in PCa grade assessment between TBx and surgery.

Comparison in prostate cancer diagnosis with PSA 4-10 ng/mL: radiomics-based model VS. PI-RADS v2.1.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate accuracy of MRI-based radiomics in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL and compare it with the latest Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v2.1) score. METHODS: 221 patients with prostate lesions and PSA levels in 4-10 ng/mL, including 154 and 67 cases in the training and validation groups. Pathological confirmation of all patients was accomplished by the use of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy or systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy. 851 radiomic features were extracted from each lesion of ADC and T2WI images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm and logistic regression were employed to select features and build the ADC and T2WI model. The combined model was obtained based on the ADC and T2WI features. The clinical benefit and diagnostic accuracy of the three radiomics models and PI-RADS v2.1 score were evaluated. RESULTS: 10 radiomic features were ultimately selected from the ADC images, 13 from the T2WI images and 7 from the combined models. The ADC, T2WI and combined models achieved satisfactory diagnostic accuracy in the training [AUC:0.945 (ADC), 0.939 (T2WI), 0.979 (combined)] and validation groups [AUC: 0.942 (ADC), 0.943 (T2WI), 0.959 (combined)], which was significantly higher than those in PI-RADS v2.1 model (0.825 for training cohort and 0.853 for validation cohort). Compared with the PI-RADS v2.1 score, the three radiomics models generated superior PCa diagnostic performance in both the training (p = 0.002, p = 0.005, p < 0.001) and validation groups (p = 0.045, p = 0.035, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Radiomics based on ADC and T2WI images can better identify PCa in patients with PSA 4-10 ng/mL, and MRI-based radiomics significantly outperforms the PI-RADS v2.1 score. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Prediction of false-positive PI-RADS 5 lesions on prostate multiparametric MRI: development and internal validation of a clinical-radiological characteristics based nomogram.

BACKGROUND: To develop a risk model including clinical and radiological characteristics to predict false-positive The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 5 lesions. METHODS: Data of 612 biopsy-naïve patients who had undergone multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) before prostate biopsy were collected. Clinical variables and radiological variables on mpMRI were adopted. Lesions were divided into the training and validation cohort randomly. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis with backward elimination was performed to screen out variables with significant difference. A diagnostic nomogram was developed in the training cohort and further validated in the validation cohort. Calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were also performed. RESULTS: 296 PI-RADS 5 lesions in 294 patients were randomly divided into the training and validation cohort (208 : 88). 132 and 56 lesions were confirmed to be clinically significant prostate cancer in the training and validation cohort respectively. The diagnostic nomogram was developed based on prostate specific antigen density, the maximum diameter of lesion, zonality of lesion, apparent diffusion coefficient minimum value and apparent diffusion coefficient minimum value ratio. The C-index of the model was 0.821 in the training cohort and 0.871 in the validation cohort. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the estimation and observation in the two cohorts. When the optimal cutoff values of ROC were 0.288 in the validation cohort, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 90.6%, 67.9%, 61.7%, and 92.7% in the validation cohort, potentially avoiding 9.7% unnecessary prostate biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a diagnostic nomogram by including 5 factors. False positive PI-RADS 5 lesions could be distinguished from clinically significant ones, thus avoiding unnecessary prostate biopsy.

MRI-based PI-RADS score predicts ISUP upgrading and adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in men with biopsy ISUP 1 prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Most men diagnosed with very-low and low-risk prostate cancer are candidates for active surveillance; however, there is still a misclassification risk. We examined whether PI-RADS category 4 or 5 combined with ISUP 1 on prostate biopsy predicts upgrading and/or adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 127 patients had ISUP 1 cancer on biopsy after multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and then underwent radical prostatectomy. We then evaluated them for ISUP upgrading and/or adverse pathology on radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Eight-nine patients (70%) were diagnosed with PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions. ISUP upgrading was significantly higher among patients with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions (84%) compared to patients with equivocal or non-suspicious mpMRI findings (26%, p < 0.001). Both PI-RADS 4-5 lesions (OR 24.3, 95% CI 7.3, 80.5, p < 0.001) and stage T2 on DRE (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.2, 29.4, p = 0.03) were independent predictors of upgrading on multivariate logistic regression analysis. Men with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions also had significantly more extra-prostatic extension (51% vs. 3%, p < 0.001) and positive surgical margins (16% vs. 3%. p = 0.03). The only independent predictor of adverse pathology was PI-RADS 4-5 (OR 21.7, 95% CI 4.8, 99, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions on mpMRI were strong independent predictors of upgrading and adverse pathology. Incorporating mpMRI findings when selecting patients for active surveillance must be further evaluated in future studies.

Radiomics from multisite MRI and clinical data to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). MRI-derived radiomics may support the diagnosis of csPCa. PURPOSE: To investigate whether adding radiomics from biparametric MRI to predictive models based on clinical and MRI parameters improves the prediction of csPCa in a multisite-multivendor setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical information (PSA, PSA density, prostate volume, and age), MRI reviews (PI-RADS 2.1), and radiomics (histogram and texture features) were retrieved from prospectively included patients examined at different radiology departments and with different MRI systems, followed by MRI-ultrasound fusion guided biopsies of lesions PI-RADS 3-5. Predictive logistic regression models of csPCa (Gleason score ≥7) for the peripheral (PZ) and transition zone (TZ), including clinical data and PI-RADS only, and combined with radiomics, were built and compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: In total, 456 lesions in 350 patients were analyzed. In PZ and TZ, PI-RADS 4-5 and PSA density, and age in PZ, were independent predictors of csPCa in models without radiomics. In models including radiomics, PI-RADS 4-5, PSA density, age, and ADC energy were independent predictors in PZ, and PI-RADS 5, PSA density and ADC mean in TZ. Comparison of areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for the models without radiomics (PZ: AUC = 0.82, TZ: AUC = 0.80) versus with radiomics (PZ: AUC = 0.82, TZ: AUC = 0.82) showed no significant differences (PZ: P = 0.366; TZ: P = 0.171). CONCLUSION: PSA density and PI-RADS are potent predictors of csPCa. Radiomics do not add significant information to our multisite-multivendor dataset.

Utility of positive core number on MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy in combination with PI-RADS scores for predicting unexpected extracapsular extension of clinically localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (TB) for predicting unexpected extracapsular extension (ECE) in clinically localized prostate cancer (CLPC). METHODS: This study enrolled 89 prostate cancer patients with one or more lesions showing a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥3 but without morphological abnormality in the prostatic capsule on pre-biopsy MRI. All patients underwent TB and systematic biopsy followed by radical prostatectomy (RP). Each lesion was examined by 3-core TB, taking cores from each third of the lesion. The preoperative variables predictive of ECE were explored by referring to RP specimens in the lesion-based analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 186 lesions, including 81 (43.5%), 73 (39.2%), and 32 (17.2%) with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5, respectively, were analyzed. One hundred and twenty-two lesions (65.6%) were diagnosed as cancer on TB, and ECE was identified in 33 (17.7%) on the RP specimens. The positive TB core number was ≤2 in 129 lesions (69.4%) and three in 57 lesions (30.6%). On the multivariate analysis, PI-RADS ≥4 (p = 0.049, odds ratio [OR] = 2.39) and three positive cores on TB (p = 0.005, OR = 3.07) were independent predictors of ECE. Lesions with PI-RADS ≥4 and a positive TB core number of 3 had a significantly higher rate of ECE than those with PI-RADS 3 and a positive TB core number ≤2 (37.5% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Positive TB core number in combination with PI-RADS scores is helpful to predict unexpected ECE in CLPC.

Limited Utility of Dynamic Contrast Enhancement Imaging Sequences Within the PI-RADS v2.1 Classification Scheme: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study of MRI Reports.

Background/Objective: We sought to characterize the proportion of peripheral zone lesions "upgraded" within the PI-RADS v2.1 protocol using DCE imaging sequences in a large patient population undergoing multiparametric prostate MRI. Methods: A retrospective review of radiologist reports for 2742 prostate MRI exams at 2 large Alberta teaching hospitals between January 2017 and January 2022 was conducted. Prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, sequence specific and overall PI-RADS scores, and lesion positivity for DCE were collected if present in the accompanying radiology report. Further, pathology reports of biopsies of the upgraded lesions within upgraded patients were reviewed to see if upgraded lesions were deemed clinically significant by gleason score/grade group. Results: The median age was 63 years, with a median PSA and PSA density of 7.5 ng/mL and 0.13 ng/mL2 respectively. A total of 1809 lesions were reported, with 69.4% of all lesions being DCE positive. Of the lesions within the peripheral zone, 548 were overall PI-RADS 4. A total of 87/2742 (3.2%) of patients were upgraded to a PI-RADS 4 by DCE imaging. Within these patients, 65 had pathology reports available, of which 18 had a clinically significant lesion at the upgrade site. Conclusion: Contrast enhancement is only beneficial for a very small portion of patients undergoing prostate MRI. Given the invasive nature of contrast enhanced studies, potential contrast induced side effects, added imaging time, and the cost of contrast agent, routine use of contrast for prostate MRI is questioned. Further studies are necessary to determine if it should be part of routine prostate MRI imaging protocols.