Individualised compared to off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty results in lower and less variable patellar tilt.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative patellar tilt at 4 months follow-up in a consecutive series of randomised patients that received individualised or off-the-shelf (OTS) primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that patellar tilt would be lower and less variable in patients who received individualised TKA compared to patients who received OTS TKA. METHODS: A consecutive series of 385 patients randomised (1:1) to receive either OTS TKA or individualised TKA were analysed. Pre- and postoperative radiographs at 4 months were obtained of weight-bearing long leg, anterior-posterior and lateral knee views and a skyline view at 30° of flexion. Postoperative patellar tilt was measured between the anterior femoral line and patellar resection surface (ß) and the anterior femoral line and mediolateral patellar axis (σ). Postoperative patellar tilt (absolute value) was compared between the individualised and OTS TKA groups based on preoperative phenotypes of their femoral mechanical angle, tibial mechanical angle and hip-knee-ankle angle. Variability in postoperative patellar tilt was compared using the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Comparisons of baseline patient characteristics revealed no difference between the individualised and OTS TKA groups. Comparison of absolute postoperative patellar tilt revealed significant differences between individualised and OTS TKA (|ß|, 1.0° ± 1.0° and 2.5° ± 2.2°, respectively, p < 0.001; |σ|, 1.7° ± 1.6° and 2.8° ± 2.3°, respectively, p < 0.001). The 95% CI of postoperative patellar tilt (|ß|) was narrower in patients that received individualised compared to OTS TKA (0.0° to 3.8° and 0.1° to 8.3°, respectively), irrespective of their preoperative phenotype. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent individualised TKA had lower and less variable postoperative patellar tilt than those with OTS TKA, irrespective of preoperative phenotype. Individualised TKA allows the decoupling of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints, replicating anatomical trochlear orientation and improving patellar tilt, which could facilitate better clinical outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study constitutes a part of a larger registered randomised controlled trial comparing patient satisfaction following OTS versus individualised TKA (NCT04460989). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Reliability and validity of quantitative ultrasound for evaluating patellar alignment: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Patellar malalignment is a risk factor of patellofemoral pain. Evaluation of the patellar alignment have mostly used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive instrument that can quickly evaluate patellar alignment. However, the method for evaluating patellar alignment via US has not been established. This study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of evaluating patellar alignment via US. METHODS: The sixteen right knees were imaged via US and MRI. US images were obtained at two sites of the knee to measure US-tilt as the index of patellar tilt. Using a single US image, we measured US-lateral distance and US-angle as the index of patellar shift. All US images were obtained three times each by two observers to evaluate reliabilities. Lateral patellar angle (LPA), as the indicators of patellar tilt, and lateral patella distance (LPD) and bisect offset (BO), as the indicators of patellar shift, were measured via MRI. RESULTS: US measurements provided high intra- (within-day and between days) and interobserver reliabilities with exception of interobserver reliability of US-lateral distance. Pearson correlation coefficient indicated that US-tilt is significantly positively correlated with LPA (r = 0.79), and US-angle is significantly positively correlated with LPD (r = 0.71) and BO (r = 0.63). CONCLUSION: Evaluating patellar alignment via US showed high reliabilities. US-tilt and US-angle showed moderate to strong correlation with MRI indices of patellar tilt and shift via MRI, respectively. US methods are useful for evaluating accurate and objective indices of patellar alignment.

Study on the correlation between the severity of patellofemoral arthritis and the morphology of the distal femur.

PURPOSE: Distal femoral torsion is a key factor for poor alignment of patellofemoral joint. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between distal femoral torsion and the severity of patellofemoral arthritis, and to analyze the correlation between distal femoral torsion and the morphology of femoral condyle. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 125 patients awaiting surgical treatment for knee osteoarthritis from January 2021 to March 2022(79 females, 46 males, average age: 65.78 years, SD 6.61). All patients underwent knee joint radiography, lower-limb digital radiography, and knee joint CT scans. The ratio of length of each distal femoral condyle, TT-TG, patellar tilt, DFL-PCL, DFL-TEA, TEA-PCL and TEA-ACL were measured. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between distal femoral torsion and ratio of distal femoral condyle, TT-TG and patellar tilt. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the correlation between each parameter and the severity of PFOA. RESULTS: With the increased severity of PFOA, TT-TG, patellar tilt, DFL-PCL, DFL-TEA and PCA all tended to increase. Patellar tilt was correlated with DFL-PCL (r = 0.243) and TEA-PCL(r = 0.201), but TT-TG had no evident correlation with distal femoral torsion. Compared with Grade I patients of PFOA, DFL-PCL, DFL-TEA, and TEA-PCL were risk factors for increased severity of patellofemoral arthritis in Grade III patients of PFOA, but there was no significant statistic difference in Grade II patients of PFOA. CONCLUSIONS: Distal femoral torsion correlates with the severity of patellofemoral arthritis. Variation of the femoral transepicondylar axis caused by the change of ratio of the femoral condyle is particularly important in the distal femoral torsion. In patients with severe PFOA, abnormal variation of the femoral condyle axis should be not ignored.

The larger patellar tilt angle and lower intercondylar notch angle might increase posterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries are common ligament injuries of the knee, and previous studies often focused on the associations between the morphology of the knee and PCL injuries. Studies on the correlation between PCL injuries and patellofemoral alignment are limited. METHODS: This retrospective study included 92 patients with PCL injured and 92 patients with PCL intact. Measurement parameters were compared between the two groups, including patellar tilt angle, congruence angle, patellar height, hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral trochlear inclination, femoral condyle ratio, bicondylar width, intercondylar notch width and index, notch angle, trochlear facet asymmetry, and trochlear sulcus depth and angle. Independent risk factors associated with PCL injuries were identified by logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: In the PCL injured group, the patellar tilt angle was significantly larger (13.19 ± 5.90° vs. 10.02 ± 4.95°, P = 0.04); the intercondylar notch angle was significantly lower (60.97 ± 7.83° vs. 67.01 ± 6.00°, P = 0.004); the medial and lateral femoral condyle ratio were significantly larger (0.63 ± 0.64 vs. 0.60 ± 0.56, P = 0.031; 0.65 ± 0.60 vs. 0.58 ± 0.53, P = 0.005) than in the PCL intact group. There were 11 patients with patellar dislocation in the PCL injured group, accounting for 12%. In these patients, the patellar height was higher (1.39 ± 0.17 vs. 1.09 ± 0.25, P = 0.009); the trochlear sulcus angle was larger (157.70 ± 8.7° vs. 141.80 ± 8.78°, P < 0.001); and the trochlear sulcus depth was shallower (3.10 ± 1.20mm vs. 5.11 ± 1.48mm, P = 0.003) than those in the patients without patellar dislocation. Multivariate analyses showed that patellar tilt angle (each increase 1 degree, OR = 1.14) and intercondylar notch angle (each increase 1 degree, OR = 0.90) were independent risk factors for PCL injuries. CONCLUSION: The patients with PCL injuries had larger patellar tilt angles, lower intercondylar notch angles, and longer posterior femoral condyles than patients with PCL intact. The larger patellar tilt angle and lower intercondylar notch angle might be risk factors for PCL injuries.

Concomitant anterior medializing osteotomy and MPFL reconstruction improves patellar tilt when compared to MPFL reconstruction alone.

PURPOSE: Understanding how surgical procedures influence anatomic factors associated with patellofemoral instability can help guide surgeons when planning treatments for individual patients. This study sought to understand how patellar tilt is affected in adolescent patients with elevated pre-operative tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove (TT-TG) values undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) with or without an anterior medializing osteotomy (AMZ). METHODS: Utilizing a prospective database of 274 patellofemoral instability patients who underwent MPFLR ± AMZ by one of two orthopedic surgeons at a single institution, those who underwent MPFLR + AMZ were identified. Pre-operative and post-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to measure TT-TG distance, while radiographs were used to measure patellar tilt (tilt). Patients were matched based on age at surgery (within 2 years) and pre-operative TT-TG distance (within 2 mm) to a comparison cohort of patients who underwent isolated MPFLR (iMPFLR) without osseous procedures. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were analyzed (28 per group). The mean age of the cohort was 15.5 ± 2.0 years and was similar between both groups (15.9 ± 1.9 versus 15.1 ± 2.0 years [n.s]). When comparing the two cohorts, significant pre- to post-operative decreases in patellar tilt for both MPFLR + AMZ (6.6 degrees, p < 0.001) and iMPFLR (3.9 degrees, p = 0.013) were noted. While there were no differences in pre-operative patellar tilt (21.2 ± 3.5 versus 21.1 ± 3.4 [n.s]), post-operatively, MPFLR + AMZ had significantly less patellar tilt than iMPFLR (13.2 ± 5.5 versus 16.5 ± 4.4, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patellar tilt significantly improved in participants undergoing either MPFLR + AMZ or iMPFLR. In addition, those undergoing MPFLR + AMZ were found to have significantly lower post-operative tilt than those undergoing iMPFLR. If patellar tilt is found pre-operatively to be significantly elevated and a risk for future dislocations, these findings suggest that surgeons might strongly consider MPFLR with AMZ to further address the increased tilt. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Midvastus Versus Medial Parapatellar Approach in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes over a period of 3 years in patients who underwent bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using midvastus (MV) versus medial parapatellar (MPP) approaches. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 2 propensity-matched cohorts of patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA via MV (n = 100) and MPP (n = 100) approaches from January 2017 to December 2018 were compared. Surgical parameters compared were surgery time and the incidence of lateral retinacular release (LRR). Clinical parameters including the visual analog score for pain, time for straight leg raise (SLR), range of motion, the Knee Society Score, and the Feller patellar score were assessed in the early postoperative and follow-up periods up to 3 years. Radiographs were evaluated for alignment, patellar tilt, and displacement. RESULTS: LRR was performed on 17 knees (8.5%) in the MPP group and 4 knees (2%) in the MV group which was significant (P = .03). The time to SLR was significantly lower in the MV group. There was no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the groups. The visual analog score, range of motion, and Knee Society Score were better in the MV group within 1 month (P < .05), but no statistically significant differences were found later. Patellar scores, radiographic patellar tilt, and displacements were similar at all follow-up periods. CONCLUSION: In our study, the MV approach had faster SLR, less LRR, and better pain and function scores in the first few weeks after TKA. However, its effect on different patient outcomes has not been sustained at 1 month and further follow-up points. We recommend that surgeons use the surgical approach with which they are most familiar.

Lateral approach total knee arthroplasty achieves equivalent patellar tracking in severe valgus deformity compared to mild valgus deformity.

PURPOSE: Patellar tracking problems represent 2-10% of complications of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) in valgus knees. However, there are no studies assessing patellar tracking according to the severity of the valgus deformity. The hypothesis was that lateral approach TKA in severe valgus deformity provides equivalent patellar tracking to that in knees with mild valgus deformity. METHODS: Between 1988 and 2016, 77 TKAs were performed via a lateral approach on a severe valgus deformity (HKA > 195°). Forty-three TKAs performed without tibial tubercle osteotomy and with complete radiological data were included in this study. These were compared with 86 matched TKAs performed via a lateral approach with a mild valgus deformity (HKA between 181° and 190°). Patellar tilt and patellar position were assessed by axial view radiographs at the last follow-up. Complications and clinical outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The follow-up was mean 52 ± 21 months in the severe valgus group. No significant differences were found between the severe valgus deformity group and the mild valgus deformity groups in patellar tilt (1.6° ± 6.6° versus 1.9° ± 3.2°, respectively) or patellar subluxation. There were complications in 12% (n = 5) and 11% (n = 9) of the severe valgus group and the mild valgus group respectively, without significant difference. There was no significant difference in extensor mechanism complication rate (2.3% versus 4.7%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Lateral parapatellar approach, without tibial tubercle osteotomy, for TKA in severe valgus deformity results in good patellar tracking. With this approach, the extensor mechanism complication rate in severe valgus deformity was not higher than for mild valgus deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

No difference between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae with a modern prosthesis design: a prospective randomized study of 250 total knee arthroplasties.

PURPOSE: Despite numerous well-conducted studies and meta-analyses, the management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between patients with and without patellar resurfacing and to determine the influence of resurfacing on patellar tracking with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis. METHODS: A single-centered prospective randomized controlled study was performed between April 2017 and November 2018. Two hundred and forty-five consecutive patients (250 knees) scheduled for TKA were randomized for patellar resurfacing or patella non-resurfacing. All patients received the same total knee prosthesis and were evaluated clinically and radiologically, including the International Knee Society Score (KSS knee and function), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), anterior knee pain (AKP), pain when climbing stairs, patellar tilt, and patellar translation. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine knees were available for clinical evaluation and 221 knees for radiographic analysis. The revision rate for patellofemoral cause was 3.1% (7 cases) with no difference between the groups (p = 0.217). There was no difference in survival rate between patellar resurfacing (88.3%) and non-resurfacing (85.3%) after 24 months (p = 0.599). There were no differences in KSS functional component (p = 0.599), KSS knee component (p = 0.396), FJS (p = 0.798), and AKP (p = 0.688) at a mean follow-up of 18 months. There was twice as much stair pain for the non-resurfacing group (17.1% versus 8.5%) (p = 0.043). There was patellar tilt in 43% of resurfaced knees (n = 50/116) versus 29% in non-resurfaced knees (n = 30/105) (p = 0.025); however, there was more patellar translation in the non-resurfaced group (21.0% versus 7.8%) (p < 0.001). There were no specific complications attributed to the patellar resurfacing procedure. There were four secondary patellar resurfacing procedures (3.6%) in the non-resurfaced group after a mean of 10 ± 7 months (1-17) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: There is no superiority of patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing in terms of clinical or radiological outcomes at mid-term. Secondary patellar resurfacing is rare. There is not enough evidence to recommend systematic patellar resurfacing with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis.

Arthroscopy-controlled medial reefing and lateral release for recurrent patellar dislocation: clinical, radiologic outcomes and complications.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported the clinical outcomes of the medial reefing procedure and lateral release with arthroscopic control of medial retinacular tension in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical, radiologic outcomes and complications of arthroscopy-controlled medial reefing and lateral release. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopy-controlled medial reefing and lateral release for recurrent patellar dislocation between November 2007 and June 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical outcome (Kujala score), radiologic outcome (congruence and patellar tilt angles), and complications were evaluated at final follow-up. The results were also compared with literature-reported outcomes of other surgical procedures for patellar dislocation. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (mean age, 18.3 ± 4.8 years) were included in the study. The mean clinical follow-up period was 7.0 ± 2.5 (range, 3.8-12.2) years. The mean Kujala score was significantly improved from 54.7 ± 14.0 (range, 37-86) preoperatively to 91.0 ± 7.6 (range, 63-99) at a mean follow-up period of 7 years (P < 0.001). The radiologic results also significantly improved from 17.8° ± 5.9° to 6.8° ± 2.4° (P < 0.001) in the congruence angle and from 17.5° ± 8.2° to 5.6° ± 3.1° (P < 0.001) in the patella tilt angle at a mean follow-up period of 3.6 years. One patient developed a redislocation after a traumatic event, and two patients showed patellofemoral osteoarthritis progression. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopy-controlled medial reefing and lateral release significantly improved the clinical and radiologic outcomes of the patients with recurrent patellar dislocation at a mean follow-up period of 7 years. The results of this study are comparable with the literature-reported outcomes of other surgical procedures for patellar dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.

Varus inclination of the tibia is related to patellofemoral osteoarthritis in Japanese female patients with moderate knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance and lateral patellar tilt, which induce patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA), are related to the coronal deformity of the lower limb in varus knee OA. It was hypothesized that varus inclination of the tibia was negatively correlated with the TT-TG distance and lateral patellar tilt in Japanese female patients with moderate knee OA. METHODS: A total of 104 female patients (139 knees) scheduled to undergo knee osteotomy for varus knee OA were enrolled. The coronal lower limb alignment was measured on anteroposterior whole-leg radiographs. The TT-TG distance, patellar tilt angle, and the patellofemoral joint space were measured both medially and laterally on computed tomography images. The correlations between coronal lower limb alignment and the TT-TG distance or patellar tilt angle, and the correlations between the TT-TG distance or patellar tilt angle and patellofemoral joint space were evaluated. RESULTS: The medial proximal tibial angle was negatively correlated with the TT-TG distance (r = - 0.383, P < 0.01) and patellar tilt angle (r = - 0.34, P < 0.01). Lateral patellofemoral joint space was negatively correlated with the TT-TG distance (r = - 0.256, P = 0.002) and patellar tilt angle (r = - 0.205, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Varus inclination of the proximal tibia may induce lateralization of the tibial tuberosity and lateral patellar tilt. The tibial tuberosity lateralization and lateral patellar tilt may induce lateral patellofemoral OA in patients with varus knee OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Patellar component size effects patellar tilt in total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing.

PURPOSE: Patellar component positioning and patellofemoral kinematics are of great importance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The factors influencing patellar tilt are femoral rotation and lateral patellar release. However, the effect of patellar component size remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra-operative risk factors for patellar tilt, particularly the effect of the patellar component size. The hypothesis was that increasing the patellar component size would reduce the risk of patellar tilt. METHODS: 878 primary TKAs with patellar resurfacing were included between January 2015 and October 2018. Analysis was performed at 1-year postoperatively on patients categorized into two groups: patellar tilt (PT) and no patellar tilt (NPT). A multivariate analysis was performed for the effect of patellar component size, femoral rotation, femoral overbuilding, patellar thickness and lateral release on patellar tilt risk. Secondary analysis was performed for any difference in clinical outcomes and revision rates between groups. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that increasing the patellar component size decreased the risk of patellar tilt by 37% (p < 0.001). Placing the femoral component at 3° of external rotation decreased the risk of patellar tilt by 67% (p < 0.001). Secondary analysis showed better clinical outcomes in the NPT group, especially regarding global satisfaction, and KSS objective and subjective scores. The revision for any cause was less in the NPT group (p = 0.019). The cause for TKA revision was related to the patellar in 11% of cases in the NPT group and 65% in the PT group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Increased patellar component size and positioning the femoral component in external rotation decreases the risk of patellar tilt, improves clinical outcomes and decreases the rate of surgical revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Osteoarthritic knees have a highly variable patellofemoral alignment: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the variability of patellofemoral (PF) alignment and trochlear morphology in osteoarthritic knees. METHODS: PF alignment of the knee was defined by the following parameters: the sulcus angle (SA), femoral trochlear depth (FTD), patellar tilt angle (PTA), lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA), lateral femoral trochlear inclination (LFTI) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG). The electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from database inception to the search date (February 19, 2019) and were screened for relevant studies. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Articles reporting PF alignment measurements of osteoarthritic knees in patients over 40 years old were included. Data were extracted and methodological quality was assessed using a 14-item checklist. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies reported mean values ± SD between 120° and 141.1° ± 7.7 for the SA; 5.8 mm ± 1.4 for the FTD; between - 0.1° ± 3.3 and 10.3° ± 5.7 for the PTA; between 5.8° ± 5.4 and 17° for the LPFA; between 23.2° ± 5.0 and 27.1° ± 4.4 for the LFTI; and 5.8 mm ± 5.4 for the TT-TG. CONCLUSION: PF alignment in the osteoarthritic knee is more variable than expected. This finding should encourage surgeons to consider the individual preoperative PF alignment more precisely with the aim of reducing anterior knee pain (AKP) after TKA. 3D-CT imaging might be of great value to analyse the PF alignment in an appropriate way. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Ultrasound investigation into the relationship between hip adduction and the patellofemoral joint.

[Purpose] Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common musculoskeletal complaint. It has been suggested that hip adduction creates a load on the iliotibial band and causes lateral displacement of the patella (patella tilt). However, data gathered in a previous study were derived from a small sample of males, while the condition predominantly affects females. We assessed the relationship between hip adduction and patellar position with a larger sample size, including males and females. [Participants and Methods] Forty healthy, asymptomatic females and males (age 21.5 ± 1.3 years) were recruited. Their knees were passively flexed by 20°. Using ultrasound, the distance between the lateral edge of the patella and the lateral condyle of the femur was measured in the neutral position and at 20° adduction. [Results] Hip adduction produced a smaller patella-lateral femoral condyle measurement than in the neutral position. The mean difference in the patella-condyle distance between the neutral position and 20° hip adduction was 0.18 cm. No statistically significant difference was found between the right and left limbs, genders, Tegner scores, or BMI of the study participants. [Conclusion] The results of the study showed that hip adduction causes lateral displacement of the patella. Ultrasound is an effective means of assessing patella tilt.

Patellar facet ratio affects knee pain, stair climbing and stair descent after TKA without patellar resurfacing.

PURPOSE: To determine whether knee pain or functional impairment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing are correlated with preoperative patellar morphology or postoperative patellar orientation. The hypotheses were that patellar shape, increased tilt and lateral displacement would be associated with pain and functional impairment. METHODS: From a consecutive series of 152 knees that received a cemented postero-stabilized TKA, the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were collected at a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Uni- and multi-variable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations between the collected clinical scores and patient demographics and patellar morphology, measured from pre- and post-operative frontal, lateral and skyline view radiographs. RESULTS: The OKS was 75 ± 23, whereas the KOOS pain, stair climbing, and descent were respectively 77 ± 24, 3.9 ± 1.1 and 3.8 ± 1.2. OKS was not associated with any radiographic outcomes, whereas KOOS pain was better for knees with larger medial patellar facets. The KOOS stair climbing and descent were also better for knees with larger medial patellar facets. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study partly confirm the hypotheses that pain and functional impairments after TKA without patellar resurfacing are associated with patellar shape. No association was revealed between postoperative patellar orientation and function nor pain. Quantitative consideration of patellar congruency could therefore prevent pain and improve function after TKA without patellar resurfacing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective study, Level III.

Healthy knees have a highly variable patellofemoral alignment: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: There is still lack of knowledge regarding the variability of patellofemoral alignment in healthy, non-osteoarthritic knees, without patellofemoral instability. Therefore, a systematic review of the existing literature was performed to evaluate the variability of patellofemoral alignment. METHODS: Patellofemoral alignment of the knee was defined by the following parameters: sulcus angle (SA), femoral trochlear depth (FTD), patellar tilt angle (PTA), lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA), lateral femoral trochlear inclination (LFTI) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG). The electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from database inception to search date (January 11, 2019) and screened for relevant studies. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Articles reporting PF alignment measurements of healthy knees in patients between 15 years and 47 years were included. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies reported mean values and standard deviations for the SA between 118.7° ± 7 and 168°; for the FTD between 3.4 mm ± 1.1 and 7.1 mm ± 1.8; for the PTA between 0.7° ± 4.99 and 17.05° ± 4.3; for the LPFA between 6.26° ± 4.1 and 11.1° ± 4.0; for the LFTI between 16.3° ± 2.8 and 22.1° ± 1.9; and for the TT-TG between 9.8 mm ± 4.6 and 17.3 mm ± 5.3. CONCLUSION: Patellofemoral alignment in the healthy knee is extremely variable. A more precise knowledge of the complex relationship between the patella and the trochlea may help to better diagnose PF disorders and eventually help in selecting the correct therapy. Furthermore, standardised imaging protocols and measurement techniques for patellofemoral parameters are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Patella-patellar tendon angle decreases in patients with infrapatellar fat pad syndrome and medial patellar plica syndrome.

PURPOSE: Infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) syndrome and medial patellar plica (MPP) syndrome are two recognized causes of anterior knee pain. However, diagnosing these syndromes is challenging without arthroscopic examination. The aim of this study was to evaluate sagittal patellar tilt in patients with IPFP syndrome or MPP syndrome by measuring the patella-patellar tendon angle (PPTA) in affected patients. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with anterior knee pain who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy that confirmed isolated IPFP or MPP syndrome from 2011 to 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into Group A (IPFP syndrome, n = 44) and Group B (MPP syndrome, n = 39). The control group included 78 patients without knee pathology who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee during the study period. Radiographic measurements, including PPTA, IPFP area, patellar height, axial patellar alignment, patellar tilt, sulcus angle, and lateral trochlear inclination, were made on MRI images by two experienced sports medicine orthopedists. RESULTS: The mean PPTA in each knee-pathology group was significantly smaller than that in the control group (Group A: 137.3° ± 4.9°; Group B: 138.1° ± 3.2°; control group, 141.4° ± 2.9°). There was no significant difference between groups for any other radiographic parameter evaluated. CONCLUSION: The PPTA was significantly smaller in patients with IPFP syndrome or MPP syndrome than in healthy controls. Therefore, sagittal patellar tilt should be included in the routine evaluation of patients with anterior knee pain. Evaluation of PPTA may help to diagnose IPFP syndrome or MPP syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Total Knee Arthroplasty for Valgus Deformity via a Lateral Approach: Clinical Results, Comparison to Medial Approach, and Review of Recent Literature.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for valgus deformity is a challenge. The standard medial parapatellar approach may not be universally useful for this. We have adopted the lateral approach to valgus knees. Here we describe our experience with this approach, present early results, and compare them to the medial approach. METHODS: Our institutional registry was queried for all patients with valgus deformity who underwent a TKA via a lateral approach between 2013 and 2016. The registry was also queried for patients with valgus deformity who underwent a TKA through a medial approach in previous years and this data was compared to the study group. RESULTS: Seventy-nine valgus knees in 72 patients were operated through a lateral approach. Deformity was corrected by 10.8°, from 16.2° to 5.4° (P < .001). Patellar tilt improved from -2.3° to 0.3° (P = .037). Seven implants (9%) were constrained. Mean operating time was 87 minutes (range 53-137). Twenty-five knees in 23 patients were operated via the medial approach. Deformity was corrected by 7.3°, from 13.2° to 5.9° (P < .001). Mean operating time was 137 minutes (range 90-230). Constrained implants were used in 16% of cases. The lateral approach allowed better correction of valgus deformity (10.8 vs 7.3, P = .03) and shorter operative times (87 vs 137 minutes, P < .001). CONCLUSION: A lateral approach TKA for valgus deformity improves knee alignment and patellar tilt. Compared to the medial approach, it allows better correction of the deformity, shorter operating times, and perhaps less use of constrained implants.

Femoral derotation osteotomy for recurrent patellar dislocation.

PURPOSE: Excessive femoral internal torsion is an important risk factor for patellar dislocation. The aim of the present study was to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomy of the femur on the tibial tubercle trochlear groove (TTTG) distance or patellar tilt angle (PTA) and to report our clinical outcomes of recurrent patellar dislocation after femoral derotation osteotomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 16 patients (17 knees) with recurrent patellar dislocation treated by femoral derotation osteotomy in our department from January 2016 to February 2019 was carried out. The procedure was performed with supracondylar femoral derotation. A few procedures were combined with soft tissue procedures. Knee function was evaluated by using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Kujala score, Lysholm score, visual analog scale (VAS) score and patient satisfaction. Additionally, CT was used to assess the influence of femoral derotational osteotomy on TTTG distance and PTA. RESULTS: The average femoral antetorsion angle before surgery was 33° (SD ± 5°), and the intraoperative correction angle was 23° (SD ± 4°). A total of 17 femoral derotation osteotomies in 16 patients with patellar instability [11 females, 5 males, aged 20.8 (range 15-41) years] were included in the study. No dislocation occurred within 26.5 months after follow-up (range 12-49 months). The IKDC score, Kujala score, Lysholm score and VAS score significantly improved. The preoperative TTTG distance was 15.63 mm (SD ± 2.07 mm), and it was 14.69 mm (SD ± 1.78 mm) at the follow-up. The PTA decreased from 26.35° (SD ± 6.86°) to 11.65° (SD ± 2.85°). The powers of TTTG and PTA measurements are 0.78 and 1.00, respectively and all of these differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Derotational osteotomy of the femur for the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation can achieve good clinical results, including improved TTTG distance and PTA and improved knee function.

Preoperative Radiological Parameters Predicting the Need for Lateral Retinacular Release in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Proper patellar tracking is essential for well-functioning total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Besides implanting components in the correct position and rotation, balancing parapatellar soft tissues is also important in aiding normal patellar tracking. Patellar maltracking during TKA can be improved by lateral retinacular release (LRR). METHODS: We studied the incidence of LRR in consecutive primary TKA with nonresurfaced patella and posterior-stabilized implant design. We analyzed data from 250 consecutive primary TKAs (212 patients) from January 2016 to May 2016. We evaluated the preoperative radiological parameters like patellar tilt, patellar shift, patellar morphology, Insall-Salvati ratio, femoro-tibial angle, distal femoral valgus angle, and proximal tibia varus angle which predict the need for LRR during TKA. We used multivariate regression analysis to find the association of individual radiological parameters and the LRR. RESULTS: The need for LRR is significantly associated with preoperative radiological parameters like patellar shift and patellar tilt (P < .001). Compared to the nonreleased group, the adjusted odds of LRR were greater for morphological parameters like Wiberg type 3 patella (odds ratio [OR] 17.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.21-42.20), lateral facet thinning (OR 4.38, 95% CI 2.37-8.07), lateral patellofemoral arthritis (OR 14.36, 95% CI 6.82-30.23), and coronal valgus deformity (OR 4.95, 95% CI 1.60-10.68). CONCLUSION: Preoperative assessment of these radiological parameters in the axial view implies a high chance of tight lateral retinacular structures. This helps in identifying patients who have a higher likelihood for patellar maltracking during TKA. Appropriate LRR helps to provide better patellar tracking post TKA.

Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance Influences Patellar Tilt After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is associated with a greater risk of recurrent patellar dislocation in young, active patients. However, the effect of TT-TG distance after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been investigated. The purpose is to analyze the effect of TT-TG distance and component rotation on patellar tilt and patellar shift after TKA. METHODS: After TKA, axial computed tomography scans and axial radiograph were taken in 115 consecutive knees. TT-TG distance was measured between the most anterior point of the tibial tuberosity and the deepest point of the femoral component relative to a line connecting the anterior condyles. Femoral and tibial component rotation was measured relative to the femoral and tibial rotational axis, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: TT-TG distance had a significant correlation with patellar tilt in extension (R = 0.220, P = .018), patellar tilt in flexion (R = 0.438, P < .001), and patellar shift (R = 0.330, P < .001). Tibial component rotation had a significant correlation with patellar tilt in flexion (R = -0.251, P = .007) and patellar shift (R = -0.360, P < .001). Femoral component rotation had no significant correlations. Tibial component rotation had a significant correlation with TT-TG distance (R = -0.573, P < .001), whereas femoral component rotation had no correlation (P = .192). CONCLUSION: TT-TG distance had a significant correlation with patellar tilt and patellar shift. Surgeons need to understand the factors affecting TT-TG distance and to pay attention to avoiding excessive TT-TG distance after TKA.