A Prospective Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy vs Hormonal Therapy in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated by Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Benefits of docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) remain largely unknown. We explored whether docetaxel-based NCHT would bring pathological benefits and improve biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) over neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in locally advanced prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized trial was designed recruiting 141 locally advanced, high-risk prostate cancer patients who were randomly assigned at the ratio of 2:1 to the NCHT group (75 mg/m2 body surface area every 3 weeks plus androgen deprivation therapy for 6 cycles) and the NHT group (androgen deprivation therapy for 24 weeks). The primary end point was 3-year bPFS. Secondary end points were pathological response including pathological downstaging and minimal residual disease rates. RESULTS: The NCHT group showed significant benefits in 3-year bPFS compared to the NHT group (29% vs 9.5%, P = .002). At a median follow-up of 53 months, the NCHT group achieved a significantly longer median bPFS time than the NHT group (17 months vs 14 months). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in pathological downstaging and minimal residual disease rates. CONCLUSIONS: NCHT plus RP achieved significant bPFS benefits when compared with NHT plus RP in high-risk, locally advanced prostate cancer. A larger cohort with longer follow-up duration is essential in further investigation.

Optimization of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Side for Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to show the association between tumor location and laterality of positive lymph nodes by evaluating biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and to optimize the extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) side for prostate cancer. METHODS: The study enrolled patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with ePLND. Tumor locations were determined according to International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 4/5 in biopsies and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System category 4/5 in MRI results. The concordance of tumor location lobe and positive lymph node side with the performance of tumor location-guided ePLND for positive lymph node detection was evaluated. RESULTS: For 301 patients who underwent ePLND at Kyushu University Hospital, tumor locations determined by biopsy and MRI findings showed no lesion in 8 (2.7%) patients, unilateral lobe in 223 (74.1%) patients, and bilateral lobe in 70 (23.3%) patients. The accuracies for detection of any and all positive lymph nodes by tumor location-guided unilateral ePLND were 99.6% and 97.3%, respectively. Among the patients at St. Luke's International Hospital, the accuracies for detection of any and all positive lymph nodes by tumor location-guided unilateral ePLND were estimated to be 99.0% and 97.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposed tumor location-guided ePLND according to biopsy and MRI findings. This novel strategy is expected to reduce the burden of bilateral ePLND at the cost of acceptable risk of failing to detect positive lymph nodes.

Can neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before lateral pelvic lymph node dissection improve local control and prognosis in rectal cancer patients with clinically suspected lateral lymph node metastasis? A multicenter lateral node study in China.

AIMS: Selective lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection (LPND) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for rectal cancer is widely recognized. This study aimed to determine the effects of nCRT before LPND on local control and prognosis of rectal cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrieved from a prospective database for rectal cancer patients with clinical LPN metastasis receiving total mesorectal excision and LPND at three institutions between January 2012 and December 2019. Selection bias was minimized using propensity score matching (PSM) and short-term and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Patients (n = 213) were enrolled and grouped as either nCRT (n = 97) or non-nCRT (n = 116). PSM was used to identify 83 matched pairs. In the matched cohort, nCRT patients had a longer operation duration (310.6 vs. 265.0 min, P = 0.001), lower pathological LPN metastasis rate (32.5% vs. 48.2%, P = 0.040), and fewer harvested lymph nodes (22 vs. 25, P = 0.018) compared to the non-nCRT group. However, after PSM, the two groups had similar estimated overall 3-year survival (79.5% vs. 80.7%, P = 0.922), 3-year disease-free survival (66.1% vs. 65.5, P = 0.820), and 3-year local recurrence-free survival (88.6% vs. 89.7%, P = 0.927). Distant metastasis was the predominant recurrence pattern in the overall (45/58, 77.6%) and matched (33/44, 75.0%) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: LPND without nCRT is effective and sufficient in preventing local recurrence in patients with LPN metastases. Future prospective randomized controlled studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Since systemic metastasis is the predominant recurrence pattern in patients with LPN metastasis post-LPND, improved perioperative systemic chemotherapy is needed to prevent micrometastasis.

Assessing risk of lymph node invasion in complete responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the lymph node invasion (LNI) rate in patients exhibiting complete pathological response (CR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to test the association of CR status with lower LNI and better survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients with bladder cancer (BCa; cT2-4a; cN0; cM0) treated with NAC and radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at our institution between 2012 and 2022 (N = 157). CR (ypT0) and LNI (ypN+) were defined at final pathology. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to test the association between CR and LNI after adjusting for number of lymph nodes removed (NLR). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and disease free-survival (DFS) according to CR status. RESULTS: Overall CR and LNI rates were 40.1% and 19%, respectively. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) NLR was 26 (19-36). The LNI rate was lower in patients with CR vs those without CR (2 [3.2%] vs 61 [29.8%]; P < 0.001). After adjusting for NLR, CR reduced the LNI risk by 93% (odds ratio 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.25; P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier plots depicted better 5-year OS (69.7 vs 52.2%), MFS (68.3 vs 45.5%) and DFS (66.6 vs 43.5%) in patients with CR vs those without CR. After multivariable adjustments, CR independently reduced the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.81; P = 0.008), metastatic progression (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.71; P = 0.002) and disease progression (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.70; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, we postulate that PLND could potentially be omitted in patients exhibiting CR after NAC, due to negligible risk of LNI. Prospective Phase II trials are needed to explore this challenging hypothesis.

Use of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT for lymph node assessment before radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomograpy (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in nodal staging before radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for bladder cancer (BCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This analysis was based on a cohort of 199 BCa patients undergoing RC and bilateral PLND between 2015 and 2022. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or immunotherapy (NAI) was administered after oncological evaluation. All patients received preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT to assess extravesical disease. Point estimates for true negative, false negative, false positive, true positive, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of conventional imaging and PET/CT were calculated. Subgroup analysis in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment was performed. RESULTS: At preoperative evaluation, 30 patients (15.1%) had 48 suspicious nodal spots on 18F-FDG PET/CT. At RC and bilateral PLND, a total of 4871 lymph nodes (LNs) were removed with 237 node metastases corresponding to 126 different regions. Pathological node metastases were found in 17/30 (57%) vs 39/169 patients (23%) with suspicious vs negative preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively (sensitivity = 0.30, specificity = 0.91, PPV = 0.57, NPV = 0.77, accuracy = 0.74). On per-region analysis including 1367 nodal regions, LN involvement was found in 19/48 (39%) vs 105/1319 (8%) suspicious vs negative regions at PET/CT, respectively (sensitivity = 0.15, specificity = 0.98, PPV = 0.40, NPV = 0.92, ACC = 0.90). Similar results were observed for patients receiving NAC (n = 44, 32.1%) and NAI (n = 93, 67.9% [per-patient: sensitivity = 0.36, specificity = 0.91, PPV = 0.59, NPV = 0.80, accuracy = 0.77; per-region: sensitivity = 0.12, specificity = 0.98, PPV = 0.32, NPV = 0.93, ACC = 0.91]). Study limitations include its retrospective design and limited patient numbers. CONCLUSIONS: In eight out of 10 patients with negative preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT, pN0 disease was confirmed at final pathology. No differences were found based on NAC vs NAI treatment. These findings suggest that 18F-FDG PET/CT could play a role in the preoperative evaluation of nodal metastases in BCa patients, although its cost-effectiveness is uncertain.

Size of lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: implication for imaging and oncologic follow-up of 2705 lymph-node positive patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite modern imaging modalities, lymph-node staging before radical prostatectomy (RP) remains challenging in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). The visibility of lymph-node metastases (LNMs) is critically influenced by their size. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the distribution of maximal tumor diameters (i.e., size) in LNMs of pN1-PCa at RP and its consequences on visibility in preoperative imaging and oncological outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2705 consecutive patients with pN1-PCa at RP, harboring a cumulative 7510 LNMs, were analyzed. Descriptive and multivariable analyses addressed the risk of micrometastases (MM)-only disease and the visibility of LNMs. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox analyses were used for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) stratified for MM-only disease. RESULTS: The median LNM size was 4.5mm (interquartile range (IQR): 2.0-9.0 mm). Of 7510 LNMs, 1966 (26%) were MM (≤ 2mm). On preoperative imaging, 526 patients (19%) showed suspicious findings (PSMA-PET/CT: 169/344, 49%). In multivariable analysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (OR 0.98), age (OR 1.01), a Gleason score greater than 7 at biopsy (OR 0.73), percentage of positive cores at biopsy (OR 0.36), and neoadjuvant treatment (OR 0.51) emerged as independent predictors for less MM-only disease (p < 0.05). Patients with MM-only disease compared to those harboring larger LNMs had a longer BCRFS (median 60 versus 29 months, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Overall, 26% of LNMs were MM (≤ 2mm). Adverse clinical parameters were inversely associated with MM at RP. Consequently, PSMA-PET/CT did not detect a substantial proportion of LNMs. LNM size and count are relevant for prognosis.

The role and controversy of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer treatment: a focused review.

Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is commonly performed alongside radical prostatectomy. Its primary objective is to determine the lymphatic staging of prostate tumors by removing lymph nodes involved in lymphatic drainage. This aids in guiding subsequent treatment and removing metastatic foci, potentially offering significant therapeutic benefits. Despite varying recommendations from clinical practice guidelines across countries, the actual implementation of PLND is inconsistent, partly due to debates over its therapeutic value. While high-quality evidence supporting the superiority of PLND in oncological outcomes is lacking, its role in increasing surgical time and risk of complications is well-recognized. Despite these concerns, PLND remains the gold standard for lymph node staging in prostate cancer, providing invaluable staging information unattainable by other techniques. This article reviews PLND's scope, guideline perspectives, implementation status, oncologic and non-oncologic outcomes, alternatives, and future research needs.

Can Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer Patients with a 5% Briganti Nomogram Cut-off Value Provide an Oncological Benefit? A Large Multi-Institutional Cohort Study in Japan.

The Briganti nomogram (cut-off value 5%) is commonly used to determine the indications for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in patients with prostate cancer. We retrospectively analyzed the potential oncological benefit of PLND based on the 5% cut-off value on the Briganti nomogram. We obtained the data from the Medical Investigation Cancer Network (MICAN) Study, which included 3,463 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy (RP) at nine institutions in Japan between 2010 and 2020. We included patients with Briganti scores ≥ 5% and a follow-up period ≥6 months and excluded patients categorized in the very high-risk group (based on NCCN categories); a final total of the cases of 1,068 patients were analyzed. The biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival was significantly worse in the patients who underwent PLND compared to those who did not (p=0.019). A multivariate analysis showed that high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (p<0.001) and an advanced T-stage (p=0.018) were significant prognostic factors for BCR, whereas PLND had no effect on BCR (p=0.059). Thus, PLND in patients with prostate cancer whose Briganti score was 5% did not provide any oncological benefit. Further research is necessary to determine the indication criteria for conducting PLND.

Risk factors for and prognostic impact of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective analysis of 214 cases with radical resection.

PURPOSE: Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is rare, with unknown oncological features. We investigated the oncological impact of LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal NETs. METHODS: This study included 214 patients with rectal NETs who underwent curative surgery. We evaluated their clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: LPLN dissection was performed in 15 patients with LPLN swelling ≥ 7 mm (preoperative imaging); 12 patients had LPLN metastases, 6 of whom had LPLN metastases without mesorectal lymph node metastases (skip metastasis). The short-term outcomes were similar between the groups with and without LPLN dissection. The median follow-up period was 59.4 months, and patients with LPLN metastasis showed significantly shorter disease-free and overall survival rates than those without metastasis. Among 199 patients who did not undergo LPLN dissection, only 1 had LPLN recurrence. In a univariate analysis, tumor depth, tumor grade, and LPLN metastasis were associated with the overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, only LPLN metastasis was an independent predictor of the overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: LPLN metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for patients with rectal NETs. LPLN enlargement can be considered an indication for dissection, owing to its high rate of metastasis and associated poor prognosis.

Japanese expert consensus on the standardization of robot-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection in urological surgery: Extent of pelvic lymph node and surgical technique.

Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is important for accurate staging and prognosis of prostate and/or bladder cancer. Several guidelines recommend extended PLND for patients with these cancers. However, the therapeutic benefits of extended PLND are unclear. One major reason is that the extent of PLND is not clearly defined. Thus, the working group for standardization of robot-assisted PLND, including nine experienced urologists for PLND in Japan, was launched in January 2023 by the Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics. This study summarized the discussions to define the individual extent of PLND in urological surgery in a consensus meeting among these experienced urologists. The consensus meeting determined the extent of PLND based on arteries (veins) and anatomical membrane structures rather than a vague concept or approach toward PLND. This concept is expected to allow surgeons to implement the same extent of PLND. Finally, after a total of 10 online web conferences were held, we determined the extent of PLND for the obturator lymph node (LN) area, the internal iliac LN area, the external and common iliac LN area, and the presacral LN area according to the above rules. The extent of PLND suggested here currently does not have a clear therapeutic rationale. Therefore, the extent of our proposed PLND is by no means mandatory. We hope our definition of the extent of PLND will be supported by further evidence of therapeutic benefits for urologic cancers.

Comparison between preoperative chemoradiotherapy and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in clinical T3 low rectal cancer without enlarged lateral lymph nodes.

AIM: The standard strategy for clinical T3 rectal cancer without enlarged lateral lymph nodes is preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) in Western countries and TME with bilateral lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in Japan. This study compared surgical, pathological and oncological results of these two strategies. METHOD: Patients who underwent preoperative CRT followed by TME in France (CRT + TME group) and those who underwent TME with LPLND in Japan (TME + LPLND group) for clinical T3 rectal adenocarcinoma without enlarged lateral lymph nodes from 2010 to 2016 were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: In total, 439 patients were included in this study. The estimated local recurrence rate (LRR), disease-free survival and overall survival at 5 years post-surgery was 4.9%, 71% and 82% in the CRT + TME group, and 8.6%, 75% and 90% in the TME + LPLND group, respectively. Lateral LRR versus non-lateral LRR was 0.5% versus 4.2% in the CRT + TME group and 1.8% versus 6.2% in the TME + LPLND group. Obturator nerve injury and isolated pelvic abscess were shown only in the TME + LPLND group. Urinary complications were more frequent in the TME + LPLND group than in the CRT + TME group. CONCLUSION: Disease-free survival was not significantly different after TME with LPLND and after CRT followed by TME. LRR was not significantly different after both strategies; however, there was a trend for higher LRR after TME with LPLND than after CRT followed by TME. Obturator nerve injury, isolated lateral pelvic abscess and urinary complications should be noted when TME with LPLND is applied.

Lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green fluorescence navigation: can it be a powerful supplement tool for predicting the status of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in advanced lower rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: An innovative instrument for laparoscopy using indocyanine green (ICG) allows easy detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLNs). Here, we investigated the safety and efficacy of lateral pelvic SLN biopsy (SLNB) using ICG fluorescence navigation in advanced lower rectal cancer and evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of this technique to predict the status of LPLN. METHODS: From April 1, 2017 to December 1, 2020, we conducted lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) in 23 patients with advanced low rectal cancer who presented with LPLN but without LPLN enlargement. Data regarding clinical characteristics, surgical and pathological outcomes, lymph node findings, and postoperative complications were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: We successfully performed the surgery using fluorescence navigation. One patient underwent bilateral LLND and 22 patients underwent unilateral LLND. The lateral pelvic SLN were clearly fluorescent before dissection in 21 patients. Lateral pelvic SLN metastasis was diagnosed in 3 patients and negative in 18 patients by frozen pathological examination. Among the 21 patients in whom lateral pelvic SLN was detected, the dissected lateral pelvic non-SLNs were all negative. All dissected LPLNs were negative in two patients without fluorescent lateral pelvic SLN. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation shows promise as a safe and feasible procedure for advanced lower rectal cancer with good accuracy, and no false-negative cases were found. No metastasis in SLNB seemed to reflect all negative LPLN metastases, and this technique can replace preventive LLND for advanced lower rectal cancer.

Clinical significance of metastatic tumor deposit foci in rectal cancer in the lateral pelvic lymph node area.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have demonstrated that tumor deposits (TDs) are associated with worse prognosis in colon cancer, their clinical significance in rectal cancer has not been fully elucidated, especially in the lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) area. This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of TDs, focusing on the number of metastatic foci, including lymph node metastases (LNMs) and TDs, in the LPLN area. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 226 consecutive patients with cStage II/III low rectal cancer who underwent LPLN dissection. Metastatic foci, including LNM and TD, in the LPLN area were defined as lateral pelvic metastases (LP-M) and were evaluated according to LP-M status: presence (absence vs. presence), histopathological classification (LNM vs. TD), and number (one to three vs. four or more). We evaluated the relapse-free survival of each model and compared them using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's concordance index (c-index). RESULTS: Forty-nine of 226 patients (22%) had LP-M, and 15 patients (7%) had TDs. The median number of LP-M per patient was one (range, 1-9). The best risk stratification power was observed for number (AIC, 758; c-index, 0.668) compared with presence (AIC, 759; c-index, 0.665) and histopathological classification (AIC, 761; c-index, 0.664). The number of LP-M was an independent prognostic factor for both relapse-free and overall survival, and was significantly associated with cumulative local recurrence. CONCLUSION: The number of metastatic foci, including LNMs and TDs, in the LPLN area is useful for risk stratification of patients with low rectal cancer.

Comparison of therapeutic features and oncologic outcome in patients with pN1 prostate cancer among robot-assisted, laparoscopic, or open radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic features and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with those of open radical prostatectomy (ORP) or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in lymph node (LN) positive prostate cancer patients in a retrospective observational multi-institutional study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the clinical results of 561 patients across 33 institutions who underwent RARP, LRP, or ORP and who were diagnosed with LN-positive prostate cancer during RP with pelvic LN dissection (PLND). We determined the following survival outcomes: metastasis-free survival, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and biochemical recurrence-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to evaluate the effect of treatment on oncological outcomes. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: There was no significant difference for any of the survival outcomes between the three surgical groups. However, RARP achieved a greater LN yield compared to that of ORP or LRP. When the extent of PLND was limited to the obturator LNs, the number of removed LNs (RLNs) was comparable between the three surgical groups. However, higher numbers of RLNs were achieved with RARP compared to the number of RLNs with ORP (P < 0.001) when PLND was extended to the external and/or internal iliac LNs. CONCLUSION: RARP, LRP, and ORP provided equal surgical outcomes for pN1 prostate cancer, and the prognosis was relatively good for all procedures. Increased numbers of RLNs may not necessarily affect the oncological outcome.

Clinical significance of limited and extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for patients with localized prostate cancer: A retrospective, propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the diagnostic and therapeutic benefits of limited or extended pelvic lymph node dissection during a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Diagnostic and therapeutic benefits were assessed according to the rates of pN1 and biochemical recurrence, respectively. The primary outcome was the biochemical recurrence-free rate, and secondary outcomes included the diagnostic and therapeutic benefits of pelvic lymph node dissection. RESULTS: A total of 534 patients were analyzed. Out of the 534 patients, 207 (38.8%) received limited pelvic lymph node dissection while 134 (25.1%) received extended dissection. There were 297 patients with a Briganti index ≥5%. Extended dissections yielded significantly more resected lymph nodes (p < 0.0001), and 72.2% of cases of pN1 were located outside the obturator. The incidence rate of pN1 was 6.1%, and performance of extended lymph node dissection was an independent predictor for pN1 (odds ratio 9.0, 95% confidence interval 2.5-33.1). The rate of biochemical recurrence was 14.9%, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of the propensity score matched population revealed that patients with high or very-high risk tended to benefit from limited lymph node dissection (hazard ratio 8.4, 95% confidence interval 0.8-82.3) while the therapeutic benefit of extended dissection was unclear by comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Extended pelvic lymph node dissection significantly improves diagnostic accuracy; however, the therapeutic benefit of pelvic lymph node dissection was not observed in this study.

Development and validation of novel nomogram to identify the candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer patients in the robotic era.

OBJECTIVES: To determine candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection using a novel nomogram to assess the risk of lymph node invasion in Japanese prostate cancer patients in the robotic era. METHODS: A total of 538 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection in three hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Medical records were reviewed uniformly and the following data collected: prostate-specific antigen, age, clinical T stage, primary and secondary Gleason score at prostate biopsy, and percentage of positive core numbers. Finally, data from 434 patients were used for developing the nomogram and data from 104 patients were used for external validation. RESULTS: Lymph node invasion was detected in 47 (11%) and 16 (15%) patients in the development and validation set, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen, clinical T stage ≥3, primary Gleason score, grade group 5, and percentage of positive cores were selected as variables to incorporate into the nomogram. The area under the curve values were 0.781 for the internal and 0.908 for the external validation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present nomogram can help urologists identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection concomitant with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy among patients with prostate cancer.

Simplified approach to the medial internal iliac region using a uretero-hypogastric nerve fascia development procedure for extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Although several clinical guidelines for prostate cancer (PC) recommend extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) during radical prostatectomy for high-risk cases, there are several issues to consider, including certain technical aspects. A simplified approach to the medial internal iliac region and paravesical arteries has not been established. The uretero-hypogastric nerve fascia (UHF) envelopes the ureter, hypogastric nerve, and pelvic autonomic nerves. To preserve the UHF, it is possible to approach the medial side of the internal iliac vessels without injuring any important tissue. We analyzed technical feasibility and lymph node (LN) yields. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, 265 high-risk PC patients with ePLND were identified. A da Vinci S or Xi robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was used. We divided the patients into conventional (non-UHF) method and modified (UHF) groups. The numbers of LNs removed, procedure-related complications, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The median number of LNs removed was 19.0 in the non-UHF group and 22.0 in the UHF group (p = 0.004). Significantly more LNs were removed from the internal iliac region in the UHF group (p = 0.042). There was no difference in overall operative, console, or LN dissection time, or the severe complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III), between the non-UHF and UHF groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our simplified approach using the UHF development technique is technically feasible, has no major complications, and allows for the removal of significantly more LNs compared with the conventional method.

Correlation between extended pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary incontinence at early phase after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) on urinary incontinence (UI) at early post-surgery robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: Patients who underwent RARP without cavernous nerve sparing were included between 2014 and 2019. Patient data were obtained prospectively. The associations between ePLND and postoperative urinary continence were defined as a maximum of one daily pad use. International prostate symptom score (IPSS) was examined. Expression of synaptophysin and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in perilymph node adipose tissue (PLA) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In total, 186 and 163 patients underwent RARP with and without ePLND. Urinary continence rate at 1 month postoperatively among patients with ePLND was lower than those without ePLND (24.1% vs. 35.1%, p < 0.05), however, not significantly different at 3, 6, and 12 months after RARP (57.4 vs. 62.6%, 73.1 vs. 74.2%, and 83.0 vs. 81.2%, respectively). Total and voiding plus postvoiding IPSS scores at 1 month were higher in patients with ePLND than in those without ePLND (14.5 ± 0.5 vs. 13.6 ± 0.6, 7.0 ± 0.3 vs. 6.2 ± 0.4, respectively, p < 0.05). In univariate and multivariate analyses, larger prostate volume and ePLND were factors associated with an increased UI rate. Among patients who underwent ePLND, synaptophysin and TH-positive nerve fibers were detected in PLA. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of synaptophysin and TH-immunopositive nerves suggested denervation of sympathetic and peripheral nerves caused by ePLND might be associated with a higher UI rate and poor urinary symptoms at an early stage after RARP.

Feasibility and safety of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for elderly patients with middle-low rectal cancer: results of a large multicenter lateral node collaborative group study in China.

BACKGROUND: Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection can improve local control in certain rectal cancer patients with LPN metastasis. However, the effects of this technically complex procedure on perioperative safety and long-term survival of elderly patients (≥ 70 years) remain unclear. METHODS: Locally advanced middle-low rectal cancer patients diagnosed with LPN metastasis who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) with LPN dissection at three institutions from January 2012 to December 2019 were included in this study. Additionally patients who had neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and those who did not were compared. RESULTS: In total there were 407 patients, including 49 elderly and 358 non-elderly patients, of which 249 were male, with a median age of 58 years (range:18-85 years). In the whole cohort, operation time (280.7 vs. 292.0 min, p = 0.498) and estimated blood loss (100 vs. 100 ml, p = 0.384) were comparable in the elderly and non-elderly groups. There was no significant difference in the incidences of overall complications (24.5% vs. 19.8%, p = 0.448) and severe (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5) surgical complications (8.2% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.778) between the two groups. However, the incidence of urinary retention (14.3% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.032) and intensive care unit admission (16.3% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.018) was significantly higher in the elderly group compared with those in the non-elderly group. The 3-year overall survival (88.7% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.516) and disease-free survival (81.2% vs. 70.7%, p = 0.352) were comparable between the two groups. Moreover, results in the nCRT cohort were comparable to those in the overall cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Even with nCRT, TME combined with LPN dissection is safe and feasible for elderly patients, demonstrating low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Elderly and non-elderly patients with LPN metastasis who undergo LPN dissection can achieve comparable 3-year survival outcomes. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04850027.

Long-term outcomes of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for clinical stage II/III middle-lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI)-guided laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) was able to increase the total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes without impairing functional preservation. However, the long-term outcomes of ICG-FI-guided laparoscopic LPLND have not been evaluated. The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term outcomes of ICG-FI-guided laparoscopic LPLND to conventional laparoscopic LPLND without ICG-FI. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multi-institutional study with propensity score matching. The study population included consecutive patients with middle-low rectal cancer (clinical stage II to III) who underwent laparoscopic LPLND between January 2013 and February 2018. The main evaluation items in this study were the 3-year overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS), local recurrence rate, and lateral local recurrence (LLR) rate. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer who had undergone laparoscopic LPLND were included in this study. After propensity score matching, 58 patients were matched in each of the ICG-FI and non-ICG-FI groups. There were no substantial differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The ICG-FI group and non-ICG-FI group included 40 and 38 women and had a median age of 65 (IQR 60-72) and 66 (IQR 60-73) years, respectively. The median follow-up for all patients was 63.7 (IQR 51.3-76.8) months. The estimated respective 3-year overall survival, RFS, and local recurrence rates were 93.1%, 70.7%, and 5.2% in the ICG-FI group and 85.9%, 71.7%, and 12.8% in the non-ICG-FI group (p = 0.201, 0.653, 0.391). The 3-year cumulative LLR rate was 0% in the ICG-FI group and 9.3% in the non-ICG-FI group (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that laparoscopic LPLND combined with ICG-FI was able to decrease the LLR rate. It appears that ICG-FI could contribute to improving the quality of laparoscopic LPLND and strengthening local control of the lateral pelvis. TRIALS REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000041372 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm ).