Effects of a Modified Long-Acting Cocktail on Analgesia and Enhanced Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy and safety of a modified cocktail for postoperative analgesia and early functional rehabilitation in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Magnesium sulfate and sodium bicarbonate were added to a cocktail of ropivacaine, epinephrine, and dexamethasone. Primary outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at various intervals after surgery, morphine consumption for rescue analgesia after surgery, and time to first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes were hip function after surgery, daily walking distance, quadriceps muscle strength, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions. RESULTS: Morphine consumption was significantly lower in the modified cocktail group than in the control group in the first 24 hours after surgery (6.2 ± 6.0 versus 14.2 ± 6.4 mg, P < .001), as was total morphine consumption (10.0 ± 8.6 versus 19.2 ± 10.1 mg, P < .001). The duration of the first rescue analgesia was significantly prolonged (23.7 ± 10.3 versus 11.9 ± 5.8 mg, P < .001). Morphine consumption was also reduced in the magnesium sulfate and sodium bicarbonate groups over a 24-hour period compared to the control group (P < .001). The modified cocktail group had significantly lower resting VAS pain scores than the control group within 24 hours after surgery (P < .050). The VAS pain scores during movement within 12 hours after surgery were also lower (P < .050). The experimental groups showed better hip range of motion (P < .050) and longer walking distance (P < .050) on the first postoperative day, and levels of inflammatory markers were significantly reduced. The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was similar among the 4 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The modified cocktail with a new adjuvant can prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia, reduce the dosage of rescue analgesics, and accelerate early postoperative functional recovery in patients undergoing THA.

Addition of Surgeon-Administered Adductor Canal Infiltration to the Periarticular Infiltration in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Effect on Pain and Early Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study the additive effect of surgeon-administered adductor canal infiltration (SACI) over routine periarticular infiltration (PAI) on pain control [morphine consumption and pain score by the visual analog scale (VAS)] and early function [flexion and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test] post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We prospectively randomized 60 patients into 2 groups. Group I patients received the standard PAI, whereas in Group II, the patients received a SACI in addition to the PAI. The total volume of the injected drug and the postoperative pain management protocol were the same for all. The number of doses of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) used for breakthrough pain was recorded as PCA consumption. For early function, flexion and the TUG test were used. The VAS score and PCA consumption were compared between the 2 groups by using analyses of variance with post hoc tests as indicated. The TUG test and flexion were compared using Student t tests. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The PCA consumption in the first 6 hours was significantly higher in Group I (P = .04). The VAS at 6 hours was significantly lower in Group II (P = .042). The TUG test was comparable between the 2 groups preoperatively (P = .72) at 24 hours (P = .60) and 48 hours (P = .60) post-TKA. The flexion was comparable between the 2 groups preoperatively (P = .85) at 24 hours (P = .48) and 48 hours (P = .79) post-TKA. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a SACI to PAI provides improved pain relief and reduces opioid consumption without affecting early function post-TKA. A SACI avoids the need for an anesthesiologist or specialized equipment with no added operating time and minimal added cost. We recommend routine use of SACI for all patients undergoing TKA.

Comparative effectiveness of combined peri-articular and intra-articular injection versus intravenous and intra-articular injection of tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial study.

INTRODUCTION: Tranexamic acid (TXA) administration is supported by numerous evidence in reducing blood loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The combination of intravenous (IV) and intra-articular (IA) TXA administration revealed good result in blood loss reduction with less evidence of venous thromboembolism event (VTE). Several literature reviews portray that peri-articular (PA) administration yields similar hemostasis in comparison to IV route. However, there is no report on the clinical effect of combining PA + IA TXA in blood loss reduction and its complications, compared to combining IV + IA TXA after TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing the use of PA + IA TXA administration and IV + IA TXA administration in 70 patients who were scheduled for unilateral primary TKA. Thirty-five patients were assigned for PA + IA injection (Group 1) and anoter 35 patients were assigned for IV + IA injection (Group 2). Primary outcomes included total blood loss at 48 h, and the need for blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes included thigh and leg circumference, degree of knee flexion, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The calculated blood loss at 48 h showed no difference between Groups 1 and 2 (617 ml vs. 632 ml, p = 0.425). The total hemoglobin and hematocrit changes were not different (1.89 g/dL vs. 1.97 g/dL, p = 0.371 and 5.66% vs. 5.87%, p = 0.391). There was no need for blood transfusion in either group. However, lower thigh swelling was significant in Group 1 (2.15 cm vs. 2.79 cm, p = 0.04). Leg circumferences at 48 h was also lower in Group 1 (42.12 cm vs. 42.77 cm, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in knee flexion decrease between the two groups (38° vs. 37°, p = 0.425). There were no VTE complications or infections found in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Combined PA + IA TXA administration had similar efficacy in blood loss reduction and blood transfusion when compared to combined IV + IA TXA. The first group displayed less soft tissue swelling. The combination of PA + IA TXA administration can be used as an alternative regimen to avoid IV TXA administration.

Extensive skin necrosis following total hip arthroplasty performed through the direct anterior approach.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty is a widely performed surgical procedure, which enables patients to regain mobility, alleviates pain, and improves overall quality of life. Periarticular multimodal drug infiltration (PAI) is increasingly being used as an effective postoperative pain management, decreasing the systemic consumption of opioids. Extensive postoperative skin necrosis without a deep joint infection as a complication of total hip arthroplasty with PAI has not yet been described. CASE PRESENTATION: A 71-year-old patient who underwent total hip arthroplasty of the right hip for primary osteoarthritis through the Direct Anterior Approach presented postoperatively a large area of necrotic skin at the incision. Joint infection was excluded. An extensive debridement was performed and the tissue defect was reconstructed by a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap. The skin maintained a satisfactory appearance at 1 year postoperatively, and the hip was pain-free with restored ranges of motion. The patient was able to walk with no support and without limitation. CONCLUSION: We address the possible risk factors, discuss the use of epinephrine in PAI and explore possible treatment options for such a complication.

Diagnostic ultrasound and ultrasound-guided injections for peri-articular pain after knee replacement.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this technical report is to review the sonographic spectrum of abnormalities accounting for peri-articular pain after knee replacement surgery, as well as to demonstrate the clinical utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of this subset of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Utilizing an imaging report database, we performed a search for ultrasound examinations performed by a single radiologist for knee pain after knee arthroplasty at our institution over a 10-year period. The search yielded 63 patients, whom we have categorized by causative pathology, with representative diagnostic and procedural ultrasound images selected for inclusion. RESULTS: Our search yielded multiple causes of peri-articular knee pain after arthroplasty, including medial and lateral retinacular impingement and scarring, iliotibial band or conjoined tendon irritation, popliteus tendon impingement, medial collateral ligament impingement, pes anserine bursitis, and scarring of Hoffa's fat pad. CONCLUSION: While knee arthroplasty is an often-successful procedure, it can be complicated by post-operative peri-articular knee pain. Ultrasound provides a valuable tool for the diagnosis of painful peri-articular knee pathology, as it allows for both static and dynamic evaluation, as well as direct correlation with patient symptoms, and is not confounded by the metal components. In addition to its diagnostic utility, ultrasound can also guide diagnostic and/or therapeutic injections of anesthetic and corticosteroid. Given these advantages, ultrasound is an important tool in managing the painful post-arthroplasty knee.

Periarticular injection in addition to interscalene nerve block can decrease opioid consumption and pain following total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Interscalene nerve block (INB) is an effective technique to provide postoperative analgesia for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, the analgesic effects of the block typically resolve between 8 and 24 hours postadministration, which results in rebound pain and subsequent increased opioid use. The objective of this study was to address this issue by determining how adding an intraoperative periarticular injection (PAI) in combination with INB affects acute postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores in patients undergoing TSA. We hypothesized that compared with INB alone, INB + PAI will significantly reduce opioid consumption and pain scores for the first 24 hours postsurgery. METHODS: We reviewed 130 consecutive patients who underwent elective primary TSA at a single tertiary institution. The first 65 patients were treated with INB alone, followed by 65 patients treated with INB + PAI. The INB used was 15-20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. The PAI used was 50 mL of a combination of ropivacaine (123 mg), epinephrine (0.25 mg), clonidine (40 µg), and ketorolac (15 mg). The PAI was injected using a standardized protocol: 10 mL into the subcutaneous tissues prior to incision, 15 mL into the supraspinatus fossa, 15 mL at the base of the coracoid process, and 10 mL into the deltoid and pectoralis muscles-a protocol analogous with a previously described technique. For all patients, a standardized postoperative oral pain medication protocol was used. The primary outcome was acute postoperative opioid consumption represented by morphine equivalent units (MEUs), whereas the secondary outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores over the first 24 hours postsurgery, operative time, length of stay, and acute perioperative complications. RESULTS: No significant differences in demographics existed between patients who received INB alone vs. INB + PAI. Patients who received INB + PAI had a significantly lower 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption compared to the INB alone group (38.6 ± 30.5 MEU vs. 60.5 ± 37.3 MEU, P < .001). Additionally, VAS pain scores for the first 24 hours postsurgery in the INB + PAI group were significantly lower compared to those for the INB alone group (2.9 ± 1.5 vs. 4.3 ± 1.6, P ≤ .001). No differences existed between groups regarding operative time, length of inpatient stay, and acute perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing TSA with INB + PAI demonstrated significantly decreased 24-hour postoperative total opioid consumption and 24-hour postoperative pain scores compared to the group treated with INB alone. No increase in acute perioperative complications related to PAI was observed. Thus, compared to an INB, the addition of an intraoperative periarticular cocktail injection appears to be a safe and effective method to reduce acute postoperative pain following TSA.

Minimizing Opioid Use After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparing Periarticular Injection Versus Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia Versus a Combination Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Effective management of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be challenging. We sought to develop an opioid-sparing pain management pathway by comparing the relative effectiveness of 3 different protocols: (1) Local anesthetic administered patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) without intrathecal opioids; (2) Periarticular injection (PAI); and (3) PCEA + PAI. METHODS: In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 180 patients undergoing THA were randomized to receive either (1) PCEA with 0.06% bupivacaine, (2) PAI, or (3) a PAI + PCEA with 0.06% bupivacaine. All patients received the same postoperative multimodal analgesic regimen. The primary outcome was opioid consumption, measured in oral morphine equivalents, at 24, 48, and 72 hours after anesthesia stop time. Secondary measures included pain at rest and with movement, opioid side effects, patient satisfaction, and quality of recovery, as assessed via standardized self-reporting scales and surveys. RESULTS: Opioid consumption was significantly higher in the PAI group in the first 24 hours postoperatively compared to the PAI + PCEA group (30 versus 15, P = .012). No differences were detected among groups for length of stay, pain scores, patient satisfaction, or duration of surgery. More patients in the PAI + PCEA group were opiate-free in the first 24 hours compared to PAI (23.7 versus 8.5%, P = .043). CONCLUSION: Use of PAI + PCEA regimen was opioid-sparing in the first 24 hours after surgery, favoring this group when opioid reduction is desired. Increased drowsiness was noted in the subsequent 24 to 48 hours once the epidural catheter was removed and opioid consumption also increased.

Dexmedetomidine Prolongs the Analgesic Effects of Periarticular Infiltration Analgesia following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) is widely administered to relieve postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of prolonging the analgesic duration by adding dexmedetomidine to PIA for pain management after TKA. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups based on PIA regimens including group R (ropivacaine), group E (ropivacaine plus epinephrine), and group D (ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine). The primary outcomes were postoperative visual analog scale scores, time until the administration of first rescue analgesia, and opioid consumption. The secondary outcomes included postoperative inflammatory biomarkers and functional recovery. The tertiary outcomes were postoperative complications and adverse events. RESULTS: The patients in group D had significantly lower resting visual analog scale scores than those in groups R and E at 6 hours after surgery. Group R showed the higher pain scores at rest and motion than groups D and E 12 hours postoperatively. The use of dexmedetomidine or epinephrine postponed the time until the administration of first rescue analgesia and led to lower opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after TKA. The levels of interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α in groups D and E were significantly lower than those in group R on postoperative day 3. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in functional recovery, postoperative complications, or adverse events among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to PIA could potentiate and prolong the analgesic effect in the early stage following TKA without increasing the risk of adverse events.

The application of low-dose dexamethasone in total knee arthroplasty: finding out the best route and dosage schedule.

BACKGROUND: The use of dexamethasone as additive to multimodal analgesic regimen in total knee arthroplasty has been well established, but the most suitable route, effectiveness, safety and dose schedule of low-dose dexamethasone is not known. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial to investigate and compare the analgesic and antiemetic effects and safety of low-dose (8 mg) dexamethasone introduced as periarticular injection or intravenous (as a single dose or in two divided doses of 4 mg separated by 24 h) in unilateral total knee arthroplasty patients. RESULTS: The single dose intravenous administration as well as the periarticular administration of dexamethasone had similar mean visual analogue scores which were significantly lower than divided dose group at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. The rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting was lowest among single intravenous dose group and highest among interval dose group at 24 h, while no difference was noted at 48 h. No significant differences were noted in terms of knee flexion angle at 48 h and modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score at 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Single low-dose intravenous dexamethasone is the most appropriate dose which can safely be given to TKA patients and is only moderately associated with rise in blood sugar not causing any significant complication. Alternatively, periarticular infiltration of low-dose dexamethasone can produce equivalent analgesic effect as SDIV in first 24 h without causing significant blood sugar rise and wound complications, but its antiemetic effect remains subtle. Therefore, it is recommended to further study the combination of intraoperative periarticular and postoperative intravenous dexamethasone for their possible additive effect.

Effect of infrared irradiation combined with mannitol and kinesiology tape on postoperative swelling and pain in patients with a periarticular ankle fracture.

Objectives: To explore the effect of infrared irradiation combined with mannitol and Kinesiology tape on postoperative swelling and pain in patients with a periarticular ankle fracture. Methods: The research subjects of this study were 88 patients with periarticular ankle fracture treated by surgery in the Department of Orthopedics of Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from October, 2019 to May, 2021. They were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group based on the random number table method, with 44 cases in each group. All patients were treated after the operation. Patients in the control group were treated with conventional drugs; while those in the observation group were provided with infrared irradiation combined with mannitol and Kinesiology tape. Further comparison was conducted on the degree of swelling, pain and satisfaction after treatment at three, five and seven days after operation. Results: At three, five and seven days after operation, the cross-section diameter of the injured limb was significantly smaller in the observation group than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0. 05). The degree of pain in both groups was significantly lower at three, five and seven days after operation than that before treatment; moreover, the degree of pain in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0. 05). Besides, the comparison of posttreatment satisfaction in both groups after treatment revealed that the total satisfaction of patients in the observation group (97.73%) was higher than that in the control group (79.55%), with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Conclusion: Infrared irradiation combined with mannitol and Kinesiology tape can effectively alleviate postoperative swelling and pain of patients with a periarticular ankle fracture.

Diagnosis of traumatic shoulder arthrotomies using saline load test with intra-articular pressure monitoring.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the amount of saline required to identify a positive traumatic shoulder arthrotomy in a cadaveric model. In addition, intra-articular pressure monitoring was conducted to confirm needle placement and evaluate peak pressure curves prior to capsular failure. METHODS: We conducted a cadaveric study using thirty fresh-frozen upper extremities with maintained glenohumeral joint. A shoulder arthrotomy was made in the deltopectoral interval using a 4.4-mm trocar. The joint was loaded using an 18-gauge spinal needle inserted posteriorly and attached to a pressure monitoring system. Fluid was introduced at a uniform rate of 1 cc/sec until active extravasation was visualized from the anterior arthrotomy site. Statistical analysis included assessment of distribution, ANOVA and linear regression. RESULTS: A positive joint challenge was obtained in all specimens (n = 30) within a maximum of 59 ml of fluid (mean 28 ml, STD 15.4). Average intra-articular pressure at visualization (PAV) was 166.8 mmHg (min., 107; max., 268). In twelve specimens, peak pressures (PP) exceeded PAV, showing a corresponding fall in pressure prior to visualization (ΔPP-PAV = 16.5). To reach a sensitivity of 90% and 95% of arthrotomies, 50 and 58 ml of fluid had to be injected. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrated 58 ml of fluid was required to identify a majority of shoulder arthrotomies. Intra-articular pressure monitoring identified successful needle placement. Pressure curve analysis could identify capsular failure before fluid extravasation visualization which could enhance clinical identification and treatment of traumatic shoulder arthrotomies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Diagnostic.

Erector spinae plane block vs. peri-articular injection for pain control after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Interscalene brachial plexus block is the standard regional analgesic technique for shoulder surgery. Given its adverse effects, alternative techniques have been explored. Reports suggest that the erector spinae plane block may potentially provide effective analgesia following shoulder surgery. However, its analgesic efficacy for shoulder surgery compared with placebo or local anaesthetic infiltration has never been established. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the analgesic efficacy of pre-operative T2 erector spinae plane block with peri-articular infiltration at the end of surgery. Sixty-two patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder repair were randomly assigned to receive active erector spinae plane block with saline peri-articular injection (n = 31) or active peri-articular injection with saline erector spinae plane block (n = 31) in a blinded double-dummy design. Primary outcome was resting pain score in recovery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores with movement; opioid use; patient satisfaction; adverse effects in hospital; and outcomes at 24 h and 1 month. There was no difference in pain scores in recovery, with a median difference (95%CI) of 0.6 (-1.9-3.1), p = 0.65. Median postoperative oral morphine equivalent utilisation was significantly higher in the erector spinae plane group (21 mg vs. 12 mg; p = 0.028). Itching was observed in 10% of patients who received erector spinae plane block and there was no difference in the incidence of significant nausea and vomiting. Patient satisfaction scores, and pain scores and opioid use at 24 h were similar. At 1 month, six (peri-articular injection) and eight (erector spinae plane block) patients reported persistent pain. Erector spinae plane block was not superior to peri-articular injection for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Periarticular screws: what's in and what's out of the joint?

Periarticular hardware placement can be challenging and a source of angst for orthopaedic surgeons due to fear of penetrating the articular surface and causing undue harm to the joint. In recent years, many surgeons have turned to computed tomography (CT) and other intraoperative or postoperative modalities to determine whether hardware is truly extraarticular in areas of complex anatomy. Yet, these adjuncts are expensive, time consuming, and often unnecessary given the advancement in understanding of intraoperative fluoroscopy. We present a review article with the goal of empowering surgeons to leave the operating room, with fluoroscopy alone, assured that all hardware is beneath the articular surface that is being worked on. By understanding a simple concept, surgeons can extrapolate the information in this article to any joint and bony surface in the body. While targeted at both residents and surgeons who may not have completed a trauma fellowship, this review can benefit all orthopaedic surgeons alike.

The effect of local injection of tranexamic acid into peri-articular tissue versus drain clamping in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is used as a synthetic anti-fibrinolytic agent for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce postoperative bleeding. Though the effects on bleeding reduction of several methods of administering TXA have been demonstrated, the optimal method remains controversial. Recently, the hemostatic effect of periarticular local injection of TXA during TKA was reported. Although this method can be expected to suppress postoperative bleeding without placing a drain, its hemostatic effect has not yet been assessed in comparison with local injection and other methods of administering TXA. The aim of this randomized, prospective study was to assess the efficacy of local injection of TXA during TKA. METHODS: To confirm the effect of the local injection of TXA, drain clamping was set as the control. The subjects included a prospective series of 109 patients randomly divided into 2 groups: the local injection (group L) and the drain clamping (group D). The main outcome measure was postoperative bleeding. Secondary outcomes included pain, physical measurements, and laboratory findings. RESULTS: The calculated total blood loss (CTBL) in groups L and D was nearly equal and did not show the non-inferiority of group L to group D (883 ± 248 vs. 841 ± 257 ml, P = .564). Drained blood loss was significantly higher in group L than in group D (395 ± 130 vs 276 ± 78.8 ml, P < .0001). There was no significant difference in hidden blood loss between the groups (488 ± 269 vs 565 ± 261 ml, P = .131). The other laboratory findings and physical measurements were identical between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although CTBL in group L did not show non-inferiority to group D, the local injection of TXA was considered to be superior for suppressing bleeding considering the risk of the adverse effects of using a drain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This was a randomized, prospective study registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (Registration number: UMIN000036146, date of disclosure: 10/3/2019).

The comparison of dexamethasone and triamcinolone periarticular administration in total knee arthroplasty: retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative periarticular injection of corticosteroid effectively reduces perioperative pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, which corticosteroid is most effective for intraoperative periarticular injection remains controversial. We compared the effects of corticosteroids between dexamethasone and triamcinolone acetonide periarticular administration for reducing pain and postoperative nausea and increasing fasting blood glucose concentrations during the perioperative period following TKA. METHODS: One hundred and two patients who underwent TKA from August 2018 to September 2020 were divided into two groups: one received 10 mg dexamethasone for intraoperative periarticular injection and another receiving 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide. Postoperative pain scores at rest and during walking and nausea scores were recorded using a 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale. C-reactive protein (CRP) and fasting blood glucose levels were measured pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Pain scores in the triamcinolone group were significantly lower than in the dexamethasone group at rest 7 days postoperatively (1.5 vs. 2.0; p = 0.046) and while walking at both 72 h (3.9 vs. 4.8; p = 0.008) and 7 days postoperatively (3.2 vs. 4.0; p = 0.03). The CRP levels in the triamcinolone group were significantly lower than in the dexamethasone group at 7 days postoperatively (1.6 mg/dl vs. 3.0 mg/dl: p < 0.001). The fasting blood glucose levels at 1 day postoperatively were increased in both groups but not significantly different between the groups. No significant differences in the nausea score were noted between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Triamcinolone acetonide periarticular administration provided greater pain relief by reducing inflammation to a greater degree than dexamethasone.

Periarticular calcifications.

Periarticular calcification and ossification is a frequent finding on imaging and may sometimes pose a diagnostic challenge. The differential diagnoses for this radiological finding are wide and can be classified into broad groups such as idiopathic, developmental, trauma, burns, infection, tumor, connective tissue disease, crystalline, metabolic, vascular, and foreign bodies. With careful consideration of the clinical and imaging findings as well as awareness of mimickers of periarticular mineralization, the list of differential diagnoses can be narrowed down. This article aims to review the clinical-radiologic findings of periarticular calcified or ossified lesions with relevant imaging illustrations.

Reducing Narcotic Usage With 0.5% Bupivacaine Periarticular Injections in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Periarticular injections (PAIs) and adductor canal blocks (ACBs) are widely accepted pain management strategies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, the optimal anesthetic concentration to provide adequate pain relief while avoiding toxicity remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of different anesthetic concentrations for PAI alone and in combination with ACB. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary TKAs between January 2019 and November 2020 included 3 groups: 0.25% PAI (50 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine PAI diluted with 50 cc of saline and ketorolac), 0.5% PAI (50 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with 50 cc of saline and ketorolac), and PAI + ACB (ultrasound-guided preoperative anesthesiologist-administered ACB and 0.25% PAI). RESULTS: In total, 368 TKAs were analyzed (123 0.25%, 132 0.5%, and 113 PAI + ACB). Total overall hospital narcotic usage in oral morphine equivalents (OME) was significantly lower for the 0.5% group (120.09 vs 165.26 and 175.75) compared to the 0.25% and PAI + ACB groups, respectively (P < .0001). Cumulative OME for the first 3 shifts was also lower for 0.5% (68.7 vs 83.7 and 76.4) compared to the 0.25% and PAI + ACB groups, respectively (P = .030). Total postoperative narcotics in OME were significantly lower for 0.5% (617.9 vs 825.2 and 1047.6) than 0.25% and PAI + ACB, respectively (P = .0003). Number of prescriptions within 6 weeks postoperatively were also significantly lower for 0.5% (1.7) than 0.25% (2.1) and PAI + ACB (2.4) (P = .0003). CONCLUSION: Patients receiving 0.5% PAI had lower narcotic usage compared to 0.25% PAI or PAI + ACB. ACB may be eliminated without compromising pain control if the dose of local anesthetic in the PAI is sufficiently high.

The Efficacy and Safety of Periarticular Injection in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Direct Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Periarticular injection (PAI) is administered intraoperatively to help reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PAI in primary TJA to support the combined clinical practice guidelines of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for studies published prior to March 2020 on PAI in TJA. All included studies underwent qualitative and quantitative homogeneity testing followed by a systematic review and direct comparison meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of PAI. RESULTS: Three thousand six hundred and ninety nine publications were critically appraised to provide 60 studies regarded as the best available evidence for an analysis. The meta-analysis showed that intraoperative PAI reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Adding ketorolac or a corticosteroid to a long-acting local anesthetic (eg, ropivacaine or bupivacaine) provides an additional benefit. There is no difference between liposomal bupivacaine and other nonliposomal long-acting local anesthetics. Morphine does not provide any additive benefit in postoperative pain and opioid consumption and may increase postoperative nausea and vomiting. There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on the use of epinephrine and clonidine. CONCLUSION: Strong evidence supports the use of a PAI with a long-acting local anesthetic to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Adding a corticosteroid and/or ketorolac to a long-acting local anesthetic further reduces postoperative pain and may reduce opioid consumption. Morphine has no additive effect and there is insufficient evidence on epinephrine and clonidine.

Additional Peripheral Nerve Block to Periarticular Injection Has No Benefit for Patients Undergoing TKA: A Factorial Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Four Multimodal Analgesic Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains over what and how many analgesic techniques are required as the most effective multimodal pain regimen in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of additional analgesic methods combined with periarticular injection (PAI) analgesia for TKA. METHODS: Using retrospective cohort data, patients undergoing TKA with spinal anesthesia and PAI were divided into 4 groups. Group A (control) comprised 66 patients; group B (73 patients) had additional adductor canal block; group C (70 patients) obtained additional femoral nerve block, and group D (73 patients) received additional adductor canal block and intrathecal morphine. Propensity score matching was applied to compare visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, cumulative morphine use (CMU), knee flexion angle, straight leg raise, length of hospital stay, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: There was no significant difference regarding VAS and morphine use, when either group B or C was compared with group A. Group D had significantly lower VAS than groups A, B, and C during the first 24 hours after surgery and required significantly less CMU than groups A and B. However, the pain score of group D increased afterward, with significantly longer length of hospital stay than groups A and B. There was no difference in straight leg raise among the groups. CONCLUSION: Additional peripheral nerve block to PAI provides no benefit for patients undergoing TKA. Adjuvant intrathecal morphine could significantly reduce the VAS and CMU in the acute postoperative period; however, rebound pain with prolonged hospital stays was observed.

Comparison of iPACK and periarticular block with adductor block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: The infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) has been described to provide analgesia without loss of muscle strength and is effective in functional recovery. This study compared iPACK + ACB (adductor canal block) with PAI (periarticular infiltration) + ACB and ACB alone in terms of postoperative analgesia and functional improvement. METHODS: This double-blinded randomized controlled trial included 105 patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Patients received ACB, iPACK + ACB, and PAI + ACB along with spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) numeric rating scale (NRS) at 48 h. Secondary outcomes were cumulative postoperative analgesic consumption within 48 h, timed up-and-go test, range of motion, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. RESULTS: The 48-h AUC movement NRS score in the iPACK + ACB group was significantly lower than in the PAI + ACB and ACB groups (p < 0.05). At the postoperative 48th h, the opioid consumption of the iPACK + ACB group was lower than those of the ACB and PAI + ACB groups (p < 0.001). The patients in the iPACK + ACB group had significantly shorter discharge and mobilization days than the ACB and PAI + ACB groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The adding of an iPACK block to the ACB improves postoperative analgesia and reduces opioid consumption. In addition, this approach improves functional performance and reduces hospital stay.