Knee kinematics are not different between asymmetrical and symmetrical tibial baseplates in total knee arthroplasty: A fluoroscopic analysis of step-up and lunge motions.

PURPOSE: This clinical fluoroscopy study investigated knee kinematics of two different cemented fixed-bearing, posterior-stabilised (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs: an asymmetric tibial component including an asymmetric insert designed to optimise personalised balance and fit and its precursor symmetrical design with symmetric insert. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients (16 TKAs from each treatment group) participating in a randomised controlled trial comparing TKA migration was included. The exclusion criterion was the use of walking aids. Flat-panel fluoroscopic recordings of step-up and lunge motions were acquired 1-year postoperatively. Medial and lateral contact points (CPs) were determined to calculate CP displacement, femoral axial rotation and pivot position. Using linear mixed-effects modelling techniques, kinematics between TKA designs were compared. RESULTS: During knee extension between 20° flexion and full extension, the CPs moved anteriorly combined with a small internal femoral rotation (a screw-home mechanism). Whereas CP movement was reversed: femoral rollback, external femoral rotation while flexing the knee between full extension and 20° knee flexion, At larger flexion angles, femoral axial rotation (FAR) occurred around a lateral pivot point both during step-up and lunge. The symmetric design had a 2.3° larger range of FAR compared to the asymmetric design during lunge (p = 0.02). All other kinematics were comparable. CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in design, this study showed that the asymmetric and symmetric PS TKA designs had mostly comparable knee kinematics during step-up and lunge motions. It is therefore expected that the functionality of the successor TKA design is similar to that of its precursor design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty enhances tibiofemoral axial rotation stability in weight-bearing mid-range flexion compared to posterior-stabilised system.

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) stands as a primary intervention for severe knee ailments, yet concerns remain regarding postoperative patient satisfaction and flexion instability. This study aims to evaluate the in-vivo kinematics of medial-pivot (MP) and posterior-stabilised (PS) designs during step-up activity, in comparison to the kinematics of the nonoperated contralateral knee. METHODS: Sixteen patients with PS-TKA and 14 with MP-TKA were retrospectively examined. Clinical outcomes were assessed using patient-completed questionnaires. Motion during step-up was captured using a dual fluoroscopic system. Statistical analysis was applied to evaluate the in-vivo tibiofemoral six-degree-of-freedom kinematics and articular contact positions between the two groups. RESULTS: Despite being older, patients in the MP group reported higher postoperative subjective scores for weight-bearing functional activities. The axial rotation centres of MP-TKA located on the medial tibial plateau exhibited less variance compared to PS-TKA and contralateral knees. Compared to the contralateral knee (contralateral to medial-pivot [C-MP] or contralateral to posterior-stabilised [C-PS]), the MP group exhibited limited range of motion in terms of anteroposterior translation (MP: 3.6 ± 1.3 mm vs. C-MP: 7.4 ± 2.5 mm, p < 0.01) and axial rotation (MP: 6.6 ± 1.9° vs. C-MP: 10.3 ± 4.9°, p = 0.02), as well as in the PS group for anteroposterior translation (PS: 3.9 ± 1.7 mm vs. C-PS: 7.2 ± 3.7 mm, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The MP group with better postoperative ratings demonstrated a more stable MP axial rotation pattern during step-up activity compared to the PS group, underscoring the pivotal role of prosthetic design in optimising postoperative rehabilitation and functional recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Similar rate of return to sports activity between posterior-stabilised and cruciate-retaining primary total knee arthroplasty in young and active patient.

PURPOSE: Cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilised implant designs are available for primary total knee arthroplasty. However, whether the implant design is associated with a difference in the level of activity still remains unclear. This clinical trial compared posterior-stabilised and cruciate-retaining implants in sport-related patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, rate of return to sport, and weekly time dedicated to sport in active adults. It was also hypothesised that in young and active patients both implants lead to a similar rate of return to sport in terms of hours per week, type of sport, and joint mobility. METHODS: All patients were evaluated preoperatively and for a minimum of 36 months follow-up. The University of California Los Angeles activity scores, High-Activity Arthroplasty Score, and Visual Analogue Scale were administered preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The range of motion was investigated at admission and the last follow-up. Data concerning the hours per week dedicated to sports and the type of sport practiced were also collected at admission and at the last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier Curve was performed to compare implant survivorship. RESULTS: Data from 227 procedures (cruciate-retaining: 109, posterior-stabilised: 118) were prospectively collected. At the last follow-up, no difference was reported in The University of California Los Angeles activity scores (p = 0.6), High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (p = 0.1), Visual Analogue Scale (p = 0.9), flexion (p = 0.7) and extension (p = 0.4). No difference was found in the rate of return (p = 0.1) and weekly hours dedicated to sport (p = 0.3). The Kaplan-Meier curve evidenced no statistically significant difference in implant survivorship (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: At approximately five years of follow-up, no difference was reported between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilised implants in active adults in sport-related patient-reported outcomes measures, range of motion, pain, weekly time dedicated to sport, rate of return to sport, and implant survivorship. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective study.

Medial pivot design does not yield superior results compared to posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials.

PURPOSE: The aim of this meta-analysis was a comparison between medial pivot (MP) and posterior-stabilised (PS) knee designs regarding functional and radiological outcomes as well as gait parameters. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct and Clinical Trials.gov from conception up to April 2022, to identify eligible randomised control trials (RCTs). The extracted data were analysed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, enrolling 1101 patients who underwent 1242 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). A total of 1158 TKAs (581 MP/577 PS) were included in the quantitative analysis. Mean follow-up ranged from 6 months up to 6.6 years. MP knees showed comparable range of motion (ROM) with PS design 1, 2 and 4 years postoperatively (p = 0.2, p = 0.25, p = 0.34, respectively). No statistical difference was found in patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) (p > 0.05). Mean walking speed (MWS), length of stay (LOS), radiographic alignment and complications rates were also similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the theoretical biomechanical advantage of MP implants does not have a better impact on patient satisfaction compared to the traditional PS knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Wider translations and rotations in posterior-stabilised mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty compared to fixed-bearing both implanted with mechanical alignment: a dynamic RSA study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vivo kinematics of the same femoral design mechanically aligned posterior-stabilised (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with either fixed-bearing (FB) or mobile-bearing (MB) inlay, implanted by the same surgeon, using model-based dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The hypothesis of the present study was that the MB design would show wider axial rotation than the FB design, without affecting the clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 21 non-randomised patients (21 DePuy Attune PS-FB) was evaluated by dynamic RSA analysis at a minimum 9-month follow-up, while performing differently demanding daily living activities such as sit to stand (STS) and deep knee lunge (DKL). Kinematic data were compared with those of a cohort of 22 patients implanted with the same prosthetic design but with MB inlay. Anterior-posterior (AP) translations, varus-valgus (VV) and internal-external (IE) rotations of the femoral component with respect to the tibial baseplate were investigated. Translation of medial and lateral compartment was analysed using the low point method according to Freeman et al. Questionnaires to calculate objective and subjective clinical scores were administered preoperatively and during follow-up visit by the same investigator. RESULTS: The FB TKA design showed lower AP translation during STS (6.8 ± 3.3 mm in FB vs 9.9 ± 3.7 mm in MB, p = 0.006*), lower VV rotation (1.9 ± 0.8° in FB vs 5.3 ± 3.3° in MB, p = 0.005) and lower IE rotation (2.8 ± 1.1° in FB vs 9.5 ± 4.3° in MB, p = 0.001) during DKL than the mobile-bearing TKA design. Posterior-stabilised FB group showed significant lower translation of the low point of the medial compartment than the MB group (p = 0.008). The percentage of patients performing medial pivot in the FB group was higher compared to MB group in the examined motor tasks. No significant differences in post-operative range of motion (117° ± 16° for FB group and 124° ± 13° for MB group) and in clinical outcomes emerged between the two cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The FB and MB designs differed in AP translations, VV rotations and IE rotations of the femoral component with respect to the tibial component in STS and DKL. Furthermore, FB cohort reported a significant higher percentage of medial pivot with respect to MB cohort. Despite this, no differences in clinical outcomes were detected between groups. Both designs showed stable kinematics and represent a viable option in primary TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective cohort study, II.

Medial pivot-based total knee arthroplasty achieves better clinical outcomes than posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Stability in the sagittal plane, particularly regarding anterior cruciate ligament compensation, and postoperative functionality and satisfaction remain issues in total knee arthroplasty. Therefore, this prospective study compared the clinical outcomes between medial-pivot-based and posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty based on anterior translation and clinical scores. METHODS: To assess outcomes of total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis, the anterior translation distance of the tibia relative to the femur was measured at 30 and 60° of flexion using a KS measure Arthrometer at 6 months postoperatively. The 2011 Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, visual analogue scale for pain, and range of motion were assessed at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The correlations among each score, anterior translation distance, range of motion, and visual analogue scale score for pain were investigated. RESULTS: The medial-pivot and posterior-stabilised groups comprised 70 and 51 patients, respectively. The medial-pivot group exhibited a significantly shorter anterior translation distance at 60° flexion than the posterior-stabilised group. Furthermore, the medial-pivot group achieved significantly better outcomes regarding the visual analogue scale for pain, 2011 Knee Society Score, and Forgotten Joint Score than the posterior-stabilised group. A significant negative correlation was observed between the anterior translation distance and the function score of the 2011 Knee Society Score, whereas a significant positive correlation was found between the anterior translation distance and flexion angle, and between the extension angle and score of the Forgotten Joint Score or 2011 Knee Society Score. Significant negative correlations were also found between the pain visual analogue scale and both the 2011 Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score. CONCLUSION: In total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, the medial-pivot group displayed a shorter anterior translation distance than the posterior-stabilised group at 6 months postoperatively. The visual analogue scale score for pain was also significantly lower in the medial-pivot group than that in the posterior-stabilised group at both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Because a correlation was observed between the anterior translation distance and the function score, medial-pivot-based total knee arthroplasty was considered to significantly improve postoperative function compared to posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

Cruciate-substituting and posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasties had similar gait patterns in the short term.

PURPOSE: Surgeons want to achieve native kinematics in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Cruciate-substituting (CS) implants could restore the knee kinematics more efficiently than posterior-stabilised (PS) TKA. This study aimed to compare gait patterns in patients with CS or PS TKA at 6 months. The hypothesis was that CS implants would demonstrate comparable gait parameters to PS implants at 6 months. METHODS: In this prospective case-control study, 38 primary TKA without coronal laxity were divided into 2 groups: 19 cruciate-substituting (CS) and 19 posterior-stabilised (PS) implants. The type of prosthesis was determined according to the surgical period. Exclusion criteria were TKA revision, associated procedures and inability to walk on a treadmill. Gait analysis was conducted on a treadmill 6 months postoperatively for each patient with a knee assessment device (KneeKG®). Gait characteristics included analysis in three spatial dimensions (flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation). Clinical outcomes (Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score) were compared between both groups at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 6 months, the gait analysis did not demonstrate any significant difference between CS and PS implants. The range and the maximum anteroposterior translation were similar in both groups (9.2 ± 6.5 mm in CS group vs. 8.1 ± 3 mm in PS group (n.s.); and - 5.2 ± 5 mm in CS group vs. - 6.3 ± 5.9 mm in PS group (n.s.), respectively). The internal/external rotation, the flexion, and the varus angle were similar between CS and PS implants. The KSS Knee score was higher at 6 months in the CS group than in the PS group (92.1 ± 5.6 vs. 84.8 ± 8.9 (p < 0.01)). CONCLUSION: Cruciate-substituting and posterior-stabilised TKA had similar gait patterns at 6 months postoperatively, despite a non-equivalent posterior stabilisation system. CS prostheses were an interesting option for primary TKA for knee kinematics restoration without requiring a femoral box. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, case-control study; Level II.

Impact of increasing total knee replacement constraint within a single implant line on coronal stability: an ex vivo investigation.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the existence of diverse total knee implant designs, few data is available on the relationship between the level of implant constraint and the postoperative joint stability in the frontal plane and strain in the collateral ligaments. The current study aimed to document this relation in an ex vivo setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six fresh-frozen lower limbs underwent imaging for preparation of specimen-specific surgical guides. Specimens were dissected and assessed for joint laxity using the varus-valgus stress tests at fixed knee flexion angles. A handheld dynamometer applied tensile loads at the ankle, thereby resulting in a knee abduction-adduction moment of 10 Nm. Tibiofemoral kinematics were calculated using an optical motion capture system, while extensometers attached to medial collateral (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) measured strain. Native joint testing was followed by four TKA designs from a single implant line-cruciate retaining, posterior stabilised, varus-valgus constrained and hinged knee (HK)-and subsequent testing after each implantation. Repeated measures linear mixed-models (p < 0.05) were used to compare preoperative vs. postoperative data on frontal plane laxity and collateral ligament strain. RESULTS: Increasing implant constraint reduced frontal plane laxity across knee flexion, especially in deep flexion (r2 > 0.76), and MCL strain in extension; however, LCL strain reduction was not consistent. Frontal plane laxity increased with knee flexion angle, but similar trends were inconclusive for ligament strain. HK reduced joint laxity and ligament strain as compared to the native condition consistently across knee flexion angle, with significant reductions in flexion (p < 0.024) and extension (p < 0.001), respectively, thereby elucidating the implant design-induced joint stability. Ligament strain exhibited a strong positive correlation with varus-valgus alignment (r2 = 0.96), notwithstanding knee flexion angle or TKA implant design. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that increasing the constraint of a TKA resulted in lower frontal plane laxity of the knee. With implant features impacting laxity in the coronal plane, consequentially affecting strain in collateral ligaments, surgeons must consider these factors when deciding a TKA implant, especially for primary TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Similar outcomes to primary total knee arthroplasty achievable for aseptic revision using the same primary posterior-stabilised prosthesis at a mean follow-up of 49 months.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between primary and aseptic revision TKAs using the same posterior-stabilised (PS) prosthesis. The authors hypothesised similar outcomes between both groups for selected patients. METHODS: This retrospective, case-control study assessed 36 patients who underwent aseptic revision TKA compared to a match group of 72 primary TKA. Both groups had the same PS design implant (ANATOMIC®, Amplitude, Valence, France). The International Knee Society (IKS) score, radiological outcomes (postoperative alignment, patellar tilt and radiolucent lines), re-intervention and revision rate were compared between the two groups with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. RESULTS: The final study cohort included 29 patients and 63 patients respectively in the revision and primary group, with a mean follow-up of 49.1 months (range 36.1-69). Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in IKS scores between the two groups [169.8 for the revision group and 179.6 for the primary group (p = 0.09)]. No statistical difference was observed for post-operative satisfaction 86.2% versus 92.1% (p = 0.46). Between the two groups, there was no difference in mean radiological assessment, including radiolucent lines (p = 0.7). There was no significant difference for overall implant survivorship 96.5% versus 100% (p = 0.13) at 36 months. CONCLUSION: Similar clinical, radiological and survivorship outcomes were found between rTKA and primary TKA groups using the same PS level of constraint in patients undergoing revision surgery for aseptic indications at 3-year follow-up. Use of PS implants in rTKA for the correct indication suggests this to be a safe approach at least in the medium term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case-control study.

Implant survival of 3rd-condyle and post-cam posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty are comparable at follow-up > 10 years: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To summarise the literature on 3rd-condyle total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs and compare their survival rates to those of post-cam TKA designs. The null hypothesis was that 3rd-condyle TKAs would have equivalent survival rates compared to contemporary post-cam TKAs. METHODS: An electronic literature search for Level I-V studies was independently conducted by two researchers using Medline® and Web of Science for studies published between January 1984 and October 2020 that specifically reported on rates of implant survival and complications, joint kinematics, clinical outcomes, and radiographic outcomes of 3rd-condyle TKA. The methodological quality of clinical studies was assessed according to the Downs and Black Quality Checklist for Health Care Intervention Studies, and for in vitro and in silico studies according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool for assessing analytical cross-sectional studies. Findings extracted for each TKA design were presented as reported and synthesised narratively. Survival rates at 5, 10 and > 10 years of 3rd-condyle TKA designs were graphically compared to rates of post-cam TKA designs published in joint registries. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies were identified that reported on kinematics, clinical outcomes, radiographic alignment, and rates of complications and survival. Mean survival rates ranged from 96 to 98% at 5 years, 78-100% at 5-10 years, and 86-99% at > 10 years for 3rd-condyle PS TKAs. Mean survival rates ranged from 93 to 98% at 5 years, 89-99% at 5-10 years, and 88-95% at > 10 years for post-cam PS TKAs. CONCLUSION: Implant survival rates of 3rd-condyle TKAs are comparable to those of post-cam TKAs at follow-up > 10 years. When compared to post-cam PS TKA, 3rd-condyle designs offer an alternative for younger and more active patients when considering the added benefits of a lowered point-of-contact and larger congruent contact area at the intercondylar tibial sulcus, that reduce risks of loosening and component wear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Long-term follow-up of a non-randomised prospective cohort of one hundred and ninety two total knee arthroplasties using the NexGen implant.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyse the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes, and the long-term survivorship of the NexGen Legacy Posterior Stabilised (LPS) knee prosthesis (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA). METHODS: Between 1996 and 2001, 197 primary NexGen LPS total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were implanted by a single surgeon; 132 prostheses in 124 patients with a minimum follow-up of 15 years were included in the study. Surgical procedure and post-operative care were the same for all patients. All patients were assessed through the International Knee Society (IKS) scores and range of motion (ROM). A complete radiological study was performed for all patients. Failure was defined as revision of at least one prosthetic component for any cause. RESULTS: IKS knee and function scores, as well as ROM and leg alignment, significantly improved at the latest follow-up (p ≤ 0.05). No significant differences were found between fixed- and mobile-bearing groups. Seven implant failures were reported; the implant survival rate (overall) was 94.7% at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed optimal survivorship of the NexGen LPS, associated with a significant improvement in overall outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 15 years.

Improvement of rotational arc during deep flexion range of a novel designed polyethylene insert for posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: One of the remaining issues in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is achieving sufficient rotational arc during deep flexion range of the knee for specific postures such as the 'seiza' or cross-legged sitting. This study aimed to evaluate whether there was a change in the actual in vivo rotational arc during deep flexion range before and after a design change of polyethylene (PE) inserts. METHODS: In 50 posterior-stabilised TKA cases, knee kinematics, including rotational movement, were measured intraoperatively using an image-free navigation system to compare a newly designed PE insert with reduced the posterior lip with a conventional PE insert. Femoral-tibial rotational angles at 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 130° knee flexion were evaluated. Varus/valgus instability, knee range of motion, and femoral rollback were also measured. Obtained parameters were compared between new and conventional PE inserts. The independent factors associated with rotational arc during deep flexion range (120° and 130° knee flexion) were analysed using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The newly designed PE insert demonstrated a significant increase in the rotational arc at 120° (22.9 ± 8.7° vs. 30.1 ± 11.9°, P < 0.001) and 130° (24.3 ± 9.5° vs. 32.5 ± 12.4°, P < 0.001) knee flexion compared with that with the conventionally designed posterior-stabilised insert. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that using the newly designed PE insert was an independent predictor of improved rotational arc during deep flexion range: regression coefficient was 11.2 (95% confidence interval 7.1-15.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The design change, which reduced the posterior lip of the PE insert, contributed to improved rotational arc in 120° and 130° deep flexion ranges.

Third-generation posterior-stabilised cemented system for total knee arthroplasty: Survivorship and outcomes after 20-year follow-up.

Purpose: Total knee arthroplasty is a common procedure due to increased life expectancy and ageing populations, necessitating implants with long-term efficacy. After some initial designs, the third-generation modular posterior-stabilised NexGen® prosthesis aimed to enhance kinematics and reduce complications. This study evaluates the long-term outcomes, survivorship, revision rates and complications of this implant. With promising results observed up to 15 years in previous studies, this investigation aims to assess the implant's performance over extended follow-up periods, aiding in optimal implant selection for improved patient outcomes. Methods: We carried out a retrospective study on 263 total knee arthroplasties performed in our centre between 1998 and 2002. Statistical analysis of complications was performed and study of survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and competing risk analysis were calculated. Description of reinterventions and complications were also included. Results: Results show a 20-year prosthesis survival rate of 90.8% for revision due to any reason, with an estimated survival of 92.3% considering competitive events. Estimated survivorship at 20 years is 98% for aseptic loosening as the end point, and an estimation of 98.80% considering competitive events. Twenty revisions were performed, with 10 cases due to infection and 10 for noninfectious reasons and three of them due to aseptic loosening. Radiographic analysis revealed radiolucent lines, but no clinical evidence of loosening was observed in these cases. Conclusion: This study offers survivorship data from longer follow-up periods, what is difficult to find in the reported literature and showed excellent results of this implant in terms of survivorship and low rates of revision in our cohort. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Faster improvement in outcome scores in posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty compared to medial congruent system with posterior cruciate ligament retained.

Most studies comparing medial pivot to the posterior stabilised (PS) systems sacrifice the PCL. It is unknown whether retaining the PCL in the Medial Congruent (MC) system may provide further benefit compared to the more commonly used PS system. A retrospective review of a single-surgeon's registry data comparing 44 PS and 26 MC with PCL retained (MC-PCLR) TKAs was performed. Both groups had similar baseline demographics. The PS and MC-PCLR groups had similar pre-operative range of motion (ROM) (PS:104º ± 20º vs. MC-PCLR: 101º ± 19º, p = 0.70), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (PS: 27 ± 6 vs. MC-PCLR: 26 ± 7, p = 0.62), and Knee Society Scoring System (KS) Function Score (KS-FS) (PS: 52 ± 24 vs. MC-PCLR: 56 ± 23, p = 0.49). The pre-operative KS Knee Score (KS-KS) was significantly lower in the PS group (PS: 44 ± 14 vs. MC-PLR: 53 ± 18, p < 0.05). At 12-months post-operation, there was significant improvement in all parameters (p < 0.01). Both groups had similar ROM (PS: 115º ± 13º vs. MC-PCLR: 114º ± 10º, p = 0.98), OKS (PS: 41 ± 5 vs. MC-PCLR: 40 ± 4, p = 0.50), KS-FS (PS: 74 ± 22 vs. MC-PCLR: 77 ± 16, p = 0.78), and KS-KS (PS: 89 ± 10 vs. MC-PCLR: 89 ± 10, p = 0.89). The PS group had significant improvement in all parameters from preoperation to 3-month postoperation (p < 0.05), but not from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p ≥ 0.05). The MC-PCLR group continued to have significant improvement from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p < 0.05). Preserving the PCL when using MC may paradoxically cause an undesired additional restrain that slows the recovery process of the patients after TKA. Compared to MC-PCLR, a PS TKA may expect significantly faster improvement at 3 months post operation, although they will achieve similar outcomes at 1-year post operation.

Association of intraoperative medial joint gap laxity in the flexion position with subjective knee instability after fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative subjective knee instability is an important clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however the association with intraoperative soft tissue balance remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between intraoperative soft tissue balance and postoperative subjective knee instability in fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised (PS) TKA. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 457 patients who underwent fixed-bearing PS TKA. Intra-articular distraction force was quantitatively applied to measure the gap parameters (length and angle) during surgery. The intraoperative joint gap parameters and postoperative clinical outcomes between the patients with (n = 90) and without (n = 367) subjective knee instability were compared. The risk factors for subjective postoperative knee instability were analysed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The patients with subjective knee instability demonstrated a medially wider intra-articular gap angle and worse Knee Society Score 2011 symptoms (18 vs. 21; p < 0.01), satisfaction (27 vs. 30; p < 0.01), functional activity (55 vs. 65; p < 0.01), and Forgotten Joint Score 12 items (51 vs. 65; p < 0.01) than those in the patients without subjective knee instability. The use of measured resection technique (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.8; p = 0.02) and the medial laxity of joint gap balance in the flexion position (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4; p = 0.04) were detected as risk factors for postoperative subjective knee instability. CONCLUSION: In fixed-bearing PS TKA, intraoperative medial joint laxity in the flexion position was associated with postoperative subjective knee instability, and surgical techniques to achieve sufficient soft tissue balance contributed to improve postoperative subjective clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Ⅲ (case-control study).

Comparison between gaits after a medial pivot and posterior stabilized primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most performed orthopedic procedures worldwide. While excellent efficacy has been reported, about 20% of patients are not satisfied with the result. A potential cause is the problematic reproduction of knee kinematics. This systematic review examines gait analysis studies in primary medial pivot (MP) and posterior stabilized (PS) TKAs to investigate the differences between the two prosthesis designs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by following PRISMA guidelines. Five databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were analyzed, and eligible articles were evaluated in terms of the levels of evidence. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed by using the MINORS scoring. This review was registered in PROSPERO. RESULTS: Nine studies were included. Gait analysis was performed in 197 MP TKA and 192 PS TKA patients. PS TKA cases showed (P < 0.05) a significantly higher peak of knee flexion angle during the swing phase, greater knee flexion angle at toe-off, an increased knee adduction angle, higher knee flexion and extension moment, increased anterior femoral roll during knee flexion and anterior translation on medial and lateral condyle during knee flexion compared to MP TKA. MP TKA showed statistically significant (P < 0.05) higher knee rotational moment and greater tibiofemoral external rotation motion during knee flexion than PS TKA. No statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) was reported regarding gait spatial-temporal parameters. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Comparison in terms of Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score (mean stiffness) showed that MP TKA yielded significantly better results than PS TKA. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review revealed significant kinematic and kinetic differences between MP and PS TKA at all gait analysis phases. Furthermore, the considerable difference between TKA design and the kinematics of healthy knee were highlighted in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Clinical usefulness and safety in the early phase after a newly designed rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty: A prospective multicentre cohort study with a 2-year follow up.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the clinical results and safety of a newly designed rotating-platform posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the early postoperative phase, within 2 years of follow up. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre cohort study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent rotating-platform posterior-stabilised (PS) TKA (Vanguard PSRP). After excluding dropouts, 93 patients were analysed. The objective Knee Society Score (KSS)-2011, subjective KSS-2011, knee range of motion, EuroQol 5 Dimension index, complications, and survival rates were assessed before TKA and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. The scores at each time-point were compared, and the survival rate was assessed with revision as the endpoint. To demonstrate non-inferiority, the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent rotating-platform PS TKA were compared with those collected retrospectively from 50 patients who underwent fixed-PS TKA (Vanguard PS), defined as the control group. RESULTS: All clinical outcomes at the final follow up significantly improved compared with their preoperative values (P < 0.001). The objective KSS-2011 was 90.0 ± 8.2 points, subjective KSS-2011 satisfaction was 30.7 ± 8.6 points, expectation was 10.4 ± 2.1 points, and functional activity was 74.0 ± 18.5 points at 2 years postoperatively. Complications included knee dislocation in one patient and surgical site infection in one patient. The survival rate was 99% at 2 years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes, complications, and survival rates of newly designed TKA were not statistically different compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: The newly designed rotating-platform PS TKA showed good clinical results and suitable safety during the early postoperative phase in this prospective multicentre cohort study.

Similar outcomes including maximum knee flexion between mobile bearing condylar-stabilised and fixed bearing posterior-stabilised prosthesis: a case control study.

PURPOSE: Prosthesis design influences stability in total knee arthroplasty and may affect maximum knee flexion. Posterior-stabilised (PS) and condylar-stabilised (CS) designed prosthesis do not require a posterior-cruciate ligament to provide stability. The aim of the current study was to compare the range of motion (ROM) and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using either a PS or CS design prosthesis. METHODS: A total of 167 consecutive primary TKAs with a CS bearing (mobile deep-dish polyethylene) were retrospectively identified and compared to 332 primary TKA with a PS constraint, with similar design components from the same manufacturer. Passive ROM was assessed at last follow-up with use of a handheld goniometer. Clinical scores were assessed using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs); International Knee Society (IKS) knee and function scores and satisfaction score. Radiographic assessment was performed pre and post operatively consisting of mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA), femoral and tibial mechanical angles measured medially (FMA and TMA, respectively) on long leg radiographs, tibial slope and patella height as measured by the Blackburne-Peel index (BPI). RESULTS: Both groups had a mean follow-up of 3 years (range 2-3.7 years). Mean post-operative maximum knee flexion was 117° ± 4.9° in the PS group and 119° ± 5.2° in the CS group (p = 0.29). Postoperative IKS scores were significantly improved in both groups compared to preoperative scores (p < 0.01). The mean IKS score in the PS group was 170.9 ± 24.1 compared to 170.3 ± 22.5 in the CS group (p = 0.3). Both groups had similar radiographic outcomes as determined by coronal and sagittal alignment, tibial slope and posterior condylar offset ratio measurements. When considering the size of tibial slope change and posterior-condylar offset ratio, there was no differences between groups (p = 0.4 and 0.59 respectively). The PS group had more interventions for post-operative stiffness (arthrolysis or manipulation under anaesthesia) 8 (2.7%) compared to 1 (0.6%) in the CS group (p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Condylar-stabilised TKA have similar patient outcomes and ROM at a mean follow-up of 3 years compared to PS TKA. Highly congruent inserts could be used without compromising results in TKA at short term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case control study.

Ten- to 14-Year Results of a High-Flex Rotating Platform Knee Implant: A Follow-Up Report of a Prospective Cohort.

BACKGROUND: High-flex posterior stabilised rotating platform (PSRP) implant was introduced to provide for deep knee flexion. Few short-term results have been reported, but there are no long-term outcomes reported. METHODS: We prospectively followed 48 patients (53 knees) implanted with one such design. Inclusion criteria for implantation were patients with good pre-operative flexion and wishing to perform activities requiring deep knee flexion post-operatively, with femorotibial varus angle < 15° and having good flexion stability at trialling stage. Previously, we reported their outcomes at 2-6 years (FU-1). We now report their functional and radiological results at a minimum follow-up of 10 years (FU-2) in 39 patients (43 knees); 5 patients having died and 4 lost to follow-up. RESULTS: The mean pre-operative flexion of 124° improved to 130° at FU-1 and to 134° at FU-2. Flexion of 130° or more was seen in 59.6% knees at FU-1 and 74.42% knees at FU-2. At FU-2 mean Knee score was 90.5 and Function score was 67.8. Incidence of patellofemoral symptoms increased from 7.7% at FU-1 to 11.36% at FU-2. There were no cases of bearing spin out, osteolysis or revision surgeries. CONCLUSION: At a minimum 10-year follow-up, high-flexion PSRP design in selected patients yielded 100% survival. We recorded good knee flexion and knee society scores, with no case of spin out, implant loosening, osteolysis or revision surgery. Although deep knee flexion improved at longer follow-up, its use in ADL had reduced due to other age-related factors. There was increased incidence of patellofemoral symptoms.

In vivo kinematics of a newly updated posterior-stabilised mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing high-flexion activities.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the in vivo kinematics of a newly updated posterior-stabilised (PS) mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty during high-flexion activities in weight-bearing (WB) and non-weight-bearing (NWB) conditions. The hypothesis was that the kinematics would differ between the WB and NWB conditions, and the kinematics would be affected by the WB condition. METHODS: The kinematics of 19 knees were investigated under fluoroscopy during squatting (WB) and active-assisted knee flexion (NWB) with two- and three-dimensional registration technique. Accordingly, the range of motion, anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial and lateral contact points, axial rotation of the femoral component relative to the tibial component, and kinematic pathway were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no difference in the knee's range of motion between the WB and NWB conditions. The medial AP translation of the femur did not differ in each flexion angle between WB and NWB conditions except for flexions of 70°. There was no difference in the lateral AP translation of the femur at all tested flexion angles between the WB and NWB conditions. The external femoral rotation and the medial pivot motion were observed throughout all flexion angles in WB conditions. The clinical relevance is that this implant could produce ideal medial AP stability and medial pivot motion. CONCLUSION: The medial AP translation of the femur was stable for AP direction when it was in both WB and NWB conditions. In WB conditions, the medial pivot motion was observed throughout all flexion angles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.