Early lymphocyte collection for anti-CD19 CART production improves T-cell fitness in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeted to the CD19 B-cell antigen form an approved treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). However, since this therapy is administered after multiple lines of treatment and exposure to lymphotoxic agents, there is an urgent need to optimize this modality of treatment. METHODS: To circumvent the difficulties of harvesting adequate and optimal T cells from DLBCL patients and improve CART therapy, we suggest an earlier lymphopheresis (i.e. at first relapse, before salvage treatment). We conducted a prospective study and evaluated the potential benefit of an earlier lymphopheresis (early group, n = 22) on the clinical outcome of CD19-CART infused DLBCL patients, in comparison with standard lymphopheresis (i.e. at second relapse and beyond; standard group, n = 23). RESULTS: An increased percentage of naïve T cells and increased in vitro T-cell functionality were observed in the early group. Additionally, these cells exhibit a lower exhaustion profile than T cells collected in the standard group. CONCLUSION: While improved T-cell phenotype and function in the lymphopheresis product did not translate into significantly improved clinical outcomes, a trend towards better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was observed. Early lymphopheresis maximizes the potential of salvage therapies, without compromising CAR T-cell quality.

Glofitamab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Real-world data.

Glofitamab is a CD3xCD20 bi-specific antibody with two fragments directed to the CD20 antigen and a single CD3-binding fragment. Encouraging response and survival rates were recently reported in a pivotal phase II expansion trial conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphoma. However, the real-world data of patients of all ages with no strict selection criteria are still lacking. Herein, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who received glofitamab via compassionate use in Turkey. Forty-three patients from 20 centers who received at least one dose of the treatment were included in this study. The median age was 54 years. The median number of previous therapies was 4, and 23 patients were refractory to first-line treatment. Twenty patients had previously undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. The median follow-up time was 5.7 months. In efficacy-evaluable patients, 21% and 16% of them achieved complete response and partial response, respectively. The median response duration was 6.3 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 3.3 and 8.8 months, respectively. None of the treatment-responsive patients progressed during the study period, and their estimated 1-year PFS and OS rate was 83%. The most frequently reported toxicity was hematological toxicity. Sixteen patients survived, while 27 died at the time of the analysis. The most common cause of death was disease progression. One patient died of cytokine release syndrome during the first cycle after receiving the first dose of glofitamab. Meanwhile, two patients died due to glofitamab-related febrile neutropenia. This is the largest real-world study on the effectiveness and toxicity of glofitamab treatment in R/R DLBCL patients. The median OS of 9 months seems promising in this heavily pretreated group. The toxicity related mortality rates were the primary concerns in this study.

Quantitative evaluation of therapy options for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A model-based meta-analysis.

New therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/rDLBCL) have emerged in recent years, but there have been no comprehensive quantitative comparisons of the efficacy of these therapies. In this study, the efficacy characteristics of 11 types of treatment strategy and 63 treatment regimens were compared by model based meta-analysis. We found that compared with monotherapy, association therapy had significant benefits in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). However, whereas treatment regimens involving chemotherapy contributed to significant improvements in ORR and PFS, OS was not improved. In terms of treatment strategy, we identified chemotherapy in association with immunotherapy sequential autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the association of two different types of immunotherapies, chemotherapy sequential ASCT, chemotherapy in association with immunotherapy, and chemotherapy in association with two types of immunotherapies as showing better efficacy. With respect to specific treatment regimens, we found that the following had better efficacy: rituximab in association with inotuzumab ozogamicin; rituximab in association with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan sequential ASCT (R-BEAM+ASCT); lenalidomide in association with rituximab, etoposide, cisplatin, cytarabine, and methylprednisolone; iodine-131 tositumomab in association with BEAM sequential ASCT; and chemotherapy sequential chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy, with median OS of 48.2, 34.2, 27.8, 25.8, and 25 months, respectively. Moreover, with respect to association therapy, there was a strong correlation between the 6-month PFS and 2-year OS. The findings of this study provide the necessary quantitative information for clinical practice and clinical trial design for the treatment of r/rDLBCL.

[Polatuzumab vedotin, bendamustine, and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, including the outcome as a bridging treatment to CAR-T cell therapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant].

Pola-BR (polatuzumab vedotin, bendamustine, and rituximab) therapy received approval for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) in Japan in March 2021. There have been few reports on the efficacy and safety of Pola-BR therapy in Japanese clinical practice. A retrospective analysis was performed on twenty-nine patients with R/R DLBCL who received Pola-BR therapy at our institution (intent to cellular immunotherapy cohort: 20 patients, stand-alone treatment cohort: nine patients). The overall response rate was 69.0% (complete response 27.6%). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months, with a 9.5-month median overall survival. In the intent to cellular immunotherapy cohort, 11 of 19 patients received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) infusions, and one patient received allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Four patients received Pola-BR therapy, including bendamustine before leukapheresis, and all produced CAR-T products successfully. 3 of the 28 patients experienced grade3 or higher adverse events, and two required treatment discontinuation. Our single institution, a real-world cohort of R/R DLBCL patients showed high efficacy outcomes and a tolerable toxicity profile for Pola-BR therapy, which is comparable to previous studies. More cases are needed to determine its impact on CAR-T therapy and stem cell transplantation.

Real-world practice patterns and outcomes in Veterans with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Aim: To describe practices and outcomes in veterans with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients & methods: Using Veteran Affairs Cancer Registry System and electronic health record data, we identified relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients completing second-line treatment (2L) in 2000-2016. Treatments were classified as aggressive/nonaggressive. Analyses included descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier estimation of progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: Two hundred and seventy patients received 2L. During median 9.7-month follow-up starting from 2L, 470 regimens were observed, averaging 2.7 regimens/patient: 219 aggressive, 251 nonaggressive. One hundred and twenty-one patients proceeded to third-line, 50 to fourth-line and 18 to fifth-line treatment. Median progression-free survival in 2L was 5.2 months. Median overall survival was 9.5 months. Forty-four patients (16.3%) proceeded to bone marrow transplant. Conclusion: More effective, less toxic treatments are needed and should be initiated earlier in treatment trajectory.

Comparative effectiveness of salvage chemotherapy regimens and chimeric antigen T-cell receptor therapies in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a network meta-analysis of clinical trials.

The optimal salvage chemotherapy regimen (SC) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) prior to autologous stem cell transplant remains unclear. Moreover, although chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies were recently approved for primary refractory DLBCL, head-to-head comparisons are lacking. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL to July 2022, for randomized trials that enrolled adult patients with R/R DLBCL and performed network meta-analyses (NMA) to assess the efficacy of SC and CAR-T therapies. NMA of SC (6 trials, 7 regimens, n = 1831) indicated that rituximab with gemcitabine, dexamethasone, cisplatin (R-GDP) improved OS and PFS over compared regimens. NMA of 3 CAR-T trials (n = 865) indicated that both axi-cel and liso-cel improved PFS over standard of care, with no difference in OS. Our results indicate that R-GDP may be preferred for R/R DLBCL over other SC compared. Longer follow-up is required for ongoing comparative survival analysis as data from CAR-T trials matures.

A phase II study of lenalidomide and rituximab (R2) combination in patients with high-risk refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma have a dismal prognosis in need of innovative treatments. This prospective phase 2 study enrolled 32 patients between 2013 and 2017 with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma treated with Rituximab and Lenalidomide (R2). Median age was 69 years (40-86), 90.1% had received at least 2 prior lines of treatment, 81% were defined as having High Risk disease according to our criteria and ECOG performance status was > 2 in 51.6%. Patients received a median number of 2 cycles of R2 (1-12). With a median follow up of 22.6 months, the objective response rate was 12.5%. Median progression free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI, [1.7-2.9]) and median overall survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, [5.1-Not estimable]). This study therefore did not achieve its primary endpoint and the R2 regimen cannot be recommended in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma patients with High Risk features.

Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients Not Eligible for Stem Cell Transplant.

INTRODUCTION: Gemcitabine-based regimens are effective salvage therapy for RR lymphoma patients eligible for ASCT, but there is limited data in transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients. Here, we present a retrospective analysis on the outcome of TIE adult patients with RR lymphoma treated with gemcitabine, cisplatin or carboplatin and dexamethasone (GDP/GDCarboP) +/- rituximab regimen in our center. PATIENTS: We identified 33 patients: 54.5% diffuse large Bcell lymphoma (DLBCL), 6.1% double/triple hit lymphoma, 15% follicular lymphoma, 18% T-cell lymphoma, and 6% classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Majority of the patients had advanced-stage disease and raised LDH at relapse. The cohort's median age was 71 years. The median number of prior lines of treatment was 2, and 60.6% were refractory to their last line of treatment. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 33% (complete response 15%) for the entire cohort and 62.5% for DLBCL patients not refractory to prior line of treatment. At median follow-up of 25 months, the median duration of response and overall survival in the responders were not reached. Conversely, the median overall survival for the non-responders was dismal at 5 months. Fifty-five percent required treatment alteration (dose attenuation or omission and treatment delay for >1 week) due to adverse events, 73% needed transfusion, and 70% had at least 1 hospital admission during treatment. CONCLUSION: Our real-world data showed that GDP/GDCarboP provides meaningful efficacy and durability, especially among the responders. However, dose modification and inpatient support are frequently needed, indicating the need for good supportive care and close follow-up in this frailer population.

Liquid biopsy for disease monitoring after anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Objectives: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CARTs) against CD19 antigen represent an effective therapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL). There is no diagnostic test able to predict which patients with residual disease will relapse from those that will reach a delayed complete response. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan (PET-CT) is characterized by a significant number of false positive results after immunotherapy. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may be a good-useful tool to quantify minimal residual disease and for monitoring disease response. Methods: We present a patient with DLBCL treated with CART cells in which we tested the combined use of ctDNA and PET-CT scan. Results: Disease reassessment with PET-CT scan showed a partial remission (3 weeks) and a very good partial remission (2 months). A clinical progression at 3 months was confirmed with PET-CT scan. Levels of ctDNA progressively decreased and became undetectable. An initial increase in KMT2D p.E4385G variant allele frequency confirmed disease progression. Conclusions: Our case shows how the complementary use of ctDNA and PET-CT scan could be a helpful tool in the clinical management of these patients.

Characteristics and treatment patterns of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients receiving ≥3 therapy lines in post-CAR-T era.

OBJECTIVE: Several novel treatments have been approved for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) since chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy became available. The objective of this study was to describe characteristics and treatment patterns in patients with R/R DLBCL post-CAR-T approval. METHODS: Adult patients with R/R DLBCL who initiated third-line treatment or later (3 L+) since 18 October 2017 were identified using administrative claims from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus (1 January 2014-31 March 2020). Treatments were categorized as chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy (CT/CIT), targeted therapies, CAR-T and stem cell transplant (SCT). Treatment distribution, treatment duration of CT/CIT and targeted therapies, and initiation of next-line therapy were described for patients receiving 3 L; analyses were repeated for 4 L. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients received 3 L between 18 October 2017 and 31 March 2020. Mean age was 57 years, and 34% were female. CT/CIT (44.9%), targeted therapies (26.9%), CAR-T (17.2%) and SCT (11.0%) were administered in 3 L. The median treatment duration was 2.9 months for CT/CIT and targeted therapies combined. 31% of patients initiated 4 L within a median follow-up of 5.8 months. Among patients who received 4 L (N = 55), targeted therapies were most commonly used (36.4%), and the median treatment duration was 2.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Post-CAR-T approval, the majority of patients were treated with CT/CIT or targeted therapies in 3 L and 4 L, though most of the targeted therapies prescribed are not indicated for DLBCL. Treatment duration was short. A high proportion of patients moved to the next line of therapy (LOT) during a short follow-up period. This study highlights the unmet need for more effective treatments for patients with R/R DLBCL in 3 L+.

Patterns of leukocyte recovery predict infectious complications after CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: Adoptive immunotherapy using CD19-targeted Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Data is limited on the propensity of infections and lymphohematopoietic reconstitution after Day 30 (D30) following CAR-T cell therapy. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence and nature of infectious complications in an expanded cohort of DLBCL patients treated with CD19 CAR-T therapy and its association with the dynamics of leukocyte subpopulation reconstitution post-CAR-T cell therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including 19 patients who received axicabtagene ciloleucel and investigated associations between cytopenia and infectious complications after D30. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included, consisting of 42% Hispanic, 32% Caucasian, 21% African-American, and 5% Asian subjects. Post-D30 of CAR-T infusion, 47% patients (n=9) developed an infection and 53% (n=10) remained infection-free. The most common infection type observed was viral (7 patients) followed by bacterial (5 patients) and fungal (3 patients). Of 25 total infectious events, 56% were grade 1 or 2 and 44% were grade 3 with 10 being viral in etiology. To determine the kinetics of lymphohematopoietic reconstitution and its association with infection risk, we evaluated the relationship between cytopenias and rates of infection after D30. Notably, compared to non-infection group, infection group had a higher median absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) (1,000/µL vs. 600/µL, P<0.05), a lower median absolute neutrophil count (ANC)/ALC ratio (1.6 vs. 3.1, P<0.05) and a lower median AMC/ALC at D30 (0.37 vs. 1.67, P<0.05). In addition, we observed that only 22% of patients had recovered ANC >1,500/µL in the infection group as opposed to 70% in the non-infection group at D90 (P<0.05). Fifty-eight percent of the patients (11/19) with relapsed refractory DLBCL achieved a complete response with a median follow-up of 233 days (7.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: Although CAR-T cell therapy is highly effective, infectious complications remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Low ANC/ALC and AMC/ALC ratios at D30 are potential novel predictors of infection and can be considered in future prophylactic strategies.

Evaluating efficacy and safety of loncastuximab tesirine injection for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has a poor prognosis. Several novel therapies have gained regulatory approval for treatment of DLBCL, however there is still a need for additional therapies to be added to the armamentarium. Loncastuximab tesirine-lpyl (ADC Therapeutics), an anti-CD19 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), was recently approved for the treatment of relapsed, refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). AREAS COVERED: We review the design and pharmacologic characteristics of loncastuximab tesirine-lpyl, emphasizing on the significance of CD19 as an effective target as well as pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) as an effective payload. We review the key findings of the phase 1 LOTIS-1 and Phase 2 LOTIS-2 trials of loncastuximab in DLBCL, including efficacy and toxicity profile. EXPERT OPINION: Key findings in the early-phase trial support the efficacy of Loncastuximab in DLBCL, including in high-risk subgroups. The side effects have been tolerable even in elderly patients (≥75 years). Several ongoing clinical trials are currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of loncastuximab tesirine in a variety of NHL subtypes, as well as the study of combination strategies.

Cost utility analysis of tisagenlecleucel vs salvage chemotherapy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from Singapore's healthcare system perspective.

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) have limited treatment options and poor prognoses. Tisagenlecleucel, a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown early promise in improving survival outcomes, but at a high upfront cost. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel versus salvage chemotherapy for treating patients with r/r DLBCL who have failed at least 2 lines of systemic therapies. METHODS: A hybrid decision tree and three-state partitioned survival model (progression-free (PF), progressive disease and death) was developed from the Singapore healthcare payer perspective. Survival curves from JULIET trial and CORAL-1 extension study were extrapolated beyond trial period over a 15-year time horizon to estimate the underlying progression-free survival and overall survival parametric distributions for both arms. Health state utilities were retrieved from the literature, and direct costs were sourced from public healthcare institutions in Singapore. One-way probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of uncertainties and assumptions on cost-effectiveness results. RESULTS: Compared with salvage chemotherapy, tisagenlecleucel was associated with a base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) US$508,530 (S$686,516) per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained and US$320,200 (S$432,269) per life year (LY) gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the ICER was most sensitive to time horizon, PF utility and cost of tisagenlecleucel. Scenario analyses confirmed that the ICERs remained high under favorable assumptions and substantial price reduction was required to reduce the ICER. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed tisagenlecleucel use in r/r DLBCL patients who failed at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapies was associated with exceedingly high ICER, which is unlikely to represent good use of healthcare resources. Comparative clinical evidence from the ongoing trials might provide more insight into future evaluations.

Efficacy of salvage radiotherapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) is a modality of salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but its efficacy is currently not well defined. This paper reports a retrospective review of patients who received salvage RT for R/R DLBCL in our hospital. METHODS: We selected 32 patients who had relapsed and had progressive disease after chemotherapy or partial remission (PR) after chemotherapy. The patients had a median age of 47 years (range, 13-85 years) and were treated between January 1, 2009, and June 30, 2016. The histological type was DLBCL in all cases. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method; predictors for adverse factors were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Median age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) score was 3 (range, 0-4), and 20 (62.5%) patients had large tumors. Patients were irradiated with a median dose of 42.7 Gy (range, 30-54 Gy): 4 (12.5%) by conventional RT, 2 (6.3%) by conformal 3D technique and 26 (81.3%) by intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). Most toxicities were mild (CTCAE grade 1 or 2), including neutropenia, diarrhea, dermatitis, mucositis and dysphagia. With a median follow-up of 25.4 months (range, 0.4-98.9 months) after irradiation, the 5-year PFS and OS were 61.8% and 83.2%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, adverse factors associated with PFS in our cohort were multiple lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its low toxicity and ease of use, RT should remain a salvage therapy option for patients with R/R DLBCL.

Efficacy and prognostic analysis of ICE regimen for 84 patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma / 上海交通大学学报（医学版）

Objective · To evaluate the efficacy and prognostic factors of ifosfamide-cisplatin-etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy as salvage regimen for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).Methods · A retrospective analysis was performed on 84 relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients who were treated with ICE salvage regimen at Ruijin Hospital (Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,China) from July 2004 to June 2016.Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.Results· Of the 84 patients who were treated with ICE regimen,37 (44.0％) patients had responses,including 26 (31.0％) achieving complete remission.The median number of cycles per patient was 3 (range 1-6 cycles).The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 49.5％ and 30.0％,respectively.The median OS time was 12.2 months.On univariate analysis,patients with early progression/recurrence (P=0.041) and a high-intermediate/high risk according to the international prognostic index (IPI) (P=0.024) and NCCN-IPI (P=0.002) had poorer outcomes.While improved outcome was found in patients in complete remission after chemotherapy (P=0.000).The multivariate analysis revealed that the intermediate-high/high risk according to NCCN-IPI was an independent risk factor,and remission after chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for prolonging survival.Conclusion· The ICE regimen can be used as an effective salvage therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.