Cesarean Scar niche: Comparison of Transvaginal Ultrasound Findings and Uterine Tissue Samples after Hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: The cesarean scar (CS) niche, a consequence of incomplete wound healing, can lead to gynecological complications and affect future pregnancies. While internal niches have been well-studied, external and bidirectional niches are also important. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the prevalence and measurements of different types of niches. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study examined 200 patients with prior cesarean delivery (CD) undergoing hysterectomy due to abnormal uterine bleeding. It evaluated internal, external, and bidirectional niche prevalence, measurements (height, residual myometrial thickness, and adjacent myometrial thickness), and classification in hysterectomy specimens compared to pre-hysterectomy TVS reports. The secondary outcome was to determine niche presence in uterine tissue samples based on the number of previous CDs. RESULTS: The mean age of the study participants was 48.19 years, with 30% having undergone only one CD. Notably, 83.5% had niches detected via sonography, while 91% had niches identified in uterine tissue samples post-hysterectomy (p-value =0.008). Internal niches were common, with significant associations between niche presence and the number of previous CDs. 23.3% of patients with one CD had internal niches. Additionally, external niches were detected in 4% of hysterectomy samples but not observed in ultrasound reports. Key parameters such as RMT and AMT differed notably between ultrasound and tissue samples, highlighting discrepancies in niche detection methods. RMT ranged from 2.8-24 mm (7.68 ± 3.09 mm) in ultrasound reports versus 0-25 mm (4.28 ± 2.71 mm) in tissue samples (p < 0.001). AMT ranged from 6-29 mm (17.08 ± 4.53 mm) in ultrasound reports versus 7.5-30 mm (16 ± 5.03 mm) in tissue samples (p < 0.001). This study underscores the importance of accurate niche assessment in patients with prior CD. CONCLUSIONS: We performed a comparative analysis of niche prevalence and measurements in gross specimens and TVS reports. The results highlight the importance of considering external and bidirectional niches, in addition to internal niches. These niches can reduce residual myometrial thickness and increase future pregnancy complications. Furthermore, we demonstrated that niche formation can occur after a single CD.

Hysteroscopy-assisted Transvaginal Repair without Scar Defect Resection: A Novel Technique for the Treatment of Uterine Niche.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe hysteroscopy-assisted transvaginal repair technique without scar defect resection for uterine niche. DESIGN: Surgical video article (Supplemental Videos 1-3). Stepwise narrated video demonstration of the novel technique. A total of 15 women diagnosed as having niche in the uterus were enrolled in our study. Patients provided a signed consent and there are no conflicts of interest. SETTING: Niche in the uterus is defined as an indentation in the myometrium at the uterine incision owing to healing defects [1]. Surgical treatment options for niche include hysteroscopic, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgery [2]. Compared with hysteroscopic surgery, regular vaginal surgery may effectively increase the residual myometrium thickness, reducing the risk of subsequent pregnancy [3-5]. However, regular vaginal surgery removes the original scar defect followed by suture, which can lead to a new niche after the surgery and may postpone conception because of the new uterine incision [6]. Here we describe a new technique of hysteroscopy-assisted transvaginal repair for the niche, which does not remove the original scar defect [7]. This surgery may be beneficial for those who plan conceive as soon as possible after the operation. INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopy-assisted vaginal surgery without scar defect resection was selected as ideal surgical approach. Hysteroscopy was used for abnormal structures in the niche [8,9]. Opening the peritoneum through the vaginal wall confirmed the position of the niche, and a 2-0 absorbable suture was used to interruptedly suture the upper and lower margins of the scar defect and close the niche (or reduce its size), rather than resection. Hysteroscopy was used again to assess the status of the niche after suture and confirm repair. If unsatisfactory, suture procedure was repeated to close the remaining part of the niche. CONCLUSION: Our novel technique, described and demonstrated in this video article, is an efficacious and viable approach to treat uterine niche. Chinese experts recommend at least a 1-year gap between conventional scar defect resection with suturing and conception, because of the new uterine incision [6]. In contrast, this novel procedure avoids removal of the original scar defect and the surrounding scar tissue by directly repairing the lower uterine segment. Meanwhile, hysteroscopy can treat abnormal structures in the niche and improve effectiveness. Given that the integrity of the uterine myometrium is retained, this technique may help shorten contraception time after operation. Further studies with larger sample size, longer follow-up time, and more postoperative follow-up indicators, such as fertility outcomes, are needed to comprehensively evaluate the restorative effect of this novel technique.

Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are rising globally. Long-term adverse outcomes after CS might be reduced when the optimal uterine closure technique becomes evident. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of uterine closure techniques after CS on maternal and ultrasound outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: Literature search in electronic databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective cohort studies that evaluated uterine closure techniques and reported on ultrasound findings, perioperative or long-term outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Twenty studies (15 053 women) were included in our meta-analyses for various outcomes. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% CI through random-effect analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Residual myometrium thickness (RMT), reported in eight studies (508 women), decreased by 1.26 mm after single- compared with double-layer closure (95% CI -1.93 to -0.58), particularly when locked sutures were used. Healing ratio [RMT/adjacent myometrium thickness (AMT)] decreased after single-layer closure (WMD -7.74%, 95% CI -13.31 to -2.17), particularly in the case of locked sutures. Niche prevalence increased (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.11-2.62) when the decidua was excluded. Dysmenorrhea occurred more often in the single-layer group (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.48), whereas incidence of uterine rupture was similar (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.63-5.74). CONCLUSION: Double-layer unlocked sutures are preferable to single-layer locked sutures regarding RMT, healing ratio and dysmenorrhoea. Excluding the decidua seems to result in higher niche prevalence. As thin residual myometrium or niches may serve as intermediates for gynaecological and reproductive outcomes, future studies should focus on these outcomes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: #Uterineclosuretechniques after #caesarean affect #longtermoutcomes.

Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair with Hysteroscopic Assistance.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate our experience with hysteroscopic assistance in the laparoscopic repair of an isthmocele. DESIGN: Surgical video article (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: University hospital. INTERVENTION: A 42-year-old woman with a history of previous caesarean section presented as an emergency with a large, seriously infected isthmocele. Once the infection was cured with antibiotics, sonography revealed a 23 × 14-mm isthmocele with 1.4-mm residual myometrium thickness. She reported postmenstrual spotting and dysmenorrhea of several years duration, as well as previous dyspareunia that had worsened after her cesarean section. Given her symptomatic isthmocele with thin residual myometrium and desire for childbearing, laparoscopic repair was offered. First, the bladder was dissected to expose the isthmus. Uterine arteries were dissected. Hysteroscopic guidance and transillumination revealed the edges of the defect. The isthmocele and fibrotic tissue were excised with cold scissors, minimizing cauterization. A hysterometer was placed in the uterine cavity to respect the cervical canal and posterior uterine wall, and the myometrium was then closed in 2 layers. The total surgical time was 120 minutes. The postoperative period was uneventful. At 2 months after surgery, sonography confirmed restoration, with a myometrium thickness of 8.3 mm. The patient was asymptomatic, except for dyspareunia. At 6 months after surgery, hysteroscopic examination was normal. We recommended that the patient avoid attempting pregnancy for 9 months. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic simultaneous assistance during laparoscopic isthmocele repair can be of great help in identifying the edges of the defect, especially in large cavities and in first cases, in which edges might not be clear otherwise. Resecting all of the fibrotic tissue while respecting healthy myometrium is essential. Excessive cauterization and ischemic suturing could prevent proper healing of the myometrium.

Prognostic model on niche development after a first caesarean section: development and internal validation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and internally validate a prognostic prediction model for development of a niche in the uterine scar after a first caesarean section (CS). STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analyses on data of a randomized controlled trial, performed in 32 hospitals in the Netherlands among women undergoing a first caesarean section. We used multivariable backward logistic regression. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. Model performance was assessed by calibration and discrimination. Internal validation using bootstrapping techniques took place. The outcome was 'development of a niche in the uterus', defined as an indentation of ≥ 2 mm in the myometrium. RESULTS: We developed two models to predict niche development: in the total population and after elective CS. Patient related risk factors were: gestational age, twin pregnancy and smoking, and surgery related risk factors were double-layer closure and less surgical experience. Multiparity and Vicryl suture material were protective factors. The prediction model in women undergoing elective CS revealed similar results. After internal validation, Nagelkerke R2 ranged from 0.01 to 0.05 and was considered low; median area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.56 to 0.62, indicating failed to poor discriminative ability. CONCLUSIONS: The model cannot be used to accurately predict the development of a niche after a first CS. However, several factors seem to influence scar healing which indicates possibilities for future prevention such as surgical experience and suture material. The search for additional risk factors that play a role in development of a niche should be continued to improve the discriminative ability.

Efficacy, Safety and Outcomes of the Laparoscopic Management of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy as a Single Therapeutic Approach: A Case Series.

A standardized consensus for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is lacking. The study objective is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and outcomes of the laparoscopic management of CSP as a single therapeutic surgical approach without being preceded by vascular pretreatment or vasoconstrictors injection. This is a retrospective bi-centric study, a case series. Eight patients with a future desire to conceive underwent the laparoscopic treatment of unruptured CSPs. Surgery consisted of "en bloc" excision of the deficient uterine scar with the adherent tissue of conception, followed by immediate uterine repair. The data collected for each patient was age, gestity, parity, number of previous c-sections, pre-pregnancy isthmocele-related symptoms, gestational age, fetal cardiac activity, initial ß-human chorionic gonadotropin levels, intra-operative blood loss, blood transfusion, operative time and the postoperative complications, evaluated according to Clavien-Dindo classification. The CSP was successfully removed in all patients by laparoscopy. The surgical outcomes were favorable. All patients with histories of isthmocele-related symptoms reported postoperative resolution of symptoms. The median residual myometrium thickness increased significantly from 1.2 mm pre-operatively to 8 mm 3 to 6 months after surgery. The laparoscopic management seems to be an appropriate treatment of CSP when performed by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. It can be safely proposed as a single surgical therapeutic approach. Larger series and further prospective studies are needed to confirm this observation and to affirm the long-term gynecological and obstetrical outcomes of this management.

Single- Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Cesarean Section Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cesarean section (CS) delivery is a common procedure, and its incidence is increasing globally. To compare single-layer (SL) with double-layer (DL) uterine closure techniques after cesarean section in terms of ultrasonographic findings and rate of CS complications. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Retrieved articles were screened, and relevant studies were included in a meta-analysis. Continuous data were pooled as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and dichotomous data were pooled as relative risk (RR) and 95% CI. Analysis was conducted using RevMan software (Version 5.4). Eighteen RCTs were included in our study. Pooled results favored DL uterine closure in terms of residual myometrial thickness (MD = -1.15; 95% CI -1.69, -0.60; P < 0.0001) and dysmenorrhea (RR = 1.36; 95% CI 1.02, 1.81; P = 0.04), while SL closure had shorter operation time than DL closure (MD = -2.25; 95% CI -3.29, -1.21; P < 0.00001). Both techniques had similar results in terms of uterine dehiscence or rupture (RR = 1.88; 95% CI 0.63, 5.62; P = 0.26), healing ratio (MD = -5.00; 95% CI -12.40, 2.39; P = 0.18), maternal infectious morbidity (RR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.66, 1.34; P = 0.72), hospital stay (MD = -0.12; 95% CI -0.30, 0.06; P = 0.18), and readmission rate (RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.64, 1.40; P = 0.78). Double-layer uterine closure shows more residual myometrial thickness and lower incidence of dysmenorrhea than single-layer uterine closure of cesarean section scar. But single-layer closure has the advantage of the shorter operation time. Both methods have comparable blood loss amount, healing ratio, hospital stay duration, maternal infection risk, readmission rate, and uterine dehiscence or rupture risk.