The Taiwanese Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis: Living with the Condition.

Background and Objective: The International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS) explores the physical, psychological, and social experiences of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). This initiative is now being expanded to Taiwan as the Taiwanese Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (TMAS). We aim to provide rheumatologists with insights into the perspectives of Taiwanese patients, enabling physicians to better understand the unmet needs of these patients and optimize their management. Materials and Methods: The TMAS is a cross-sectional study gathering data through an online survey of axSpA patients, promoted by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Caring Society of R.O.C. (ASCARES), conducted from July 2017 to March 2018 by Ipsos, and analyzed by the Health & Territory Research (HTR) group of the University of Seville. The questionnaire includes 99 questions that cover domains such as patient profile, diagnosis, habits/lifestyle, employment status, physical/psychological health status, social support, use of healthcare services, and treatments. Results: A total of 112 axSpA patients were included in this survey. The mean age was 38.6 years and 75.0% were male. The average diagnostic delay was 3 years, and 19.6% reported extra-articular manifestations. Out of the 49 respondents who reported HLA-B27 information, 35 were HLA-B27-positive. The disease burden was high, with a mean BASDAI score of 4.9 and 75.9% having a mild to moderate degree of spinal stiffness. Furthermore, they were socially and psychologically burdened, with 88.4% experiencing work-related issues and 25.9% suffering from anxiety. Conclusions: The TMAS sheds light on the overall perspective of axSpA patients in Taiwan. The TMAS shows shorter diagnostic delay compared to patients from the EMAS. However, high disease activity and significant psychological distress still trouble the patients, causing functional impairments and even leading to career failures. Understanding the perspective of axSpA patients can help rheumatologists adjust treatment strategies to their unmet needs and improve their disease outcomes.

[The expert questions in practice of rheumatologist].

The rheumatic diseases are a source of serious medical, psychological, social problems both for individual and society. This pathology is characterized by: wide prevalence, often early onset, continuously progressive course. All this is resulted in at first regular episodes of temporary disability and later to disability. Even timely and adequate therapy provide no guarantee for absence of disease progression in all patients. The rheumatologist is to know both clinical guidelines and legislative acts regulating issues of determining disability. The characteristic of The medical social expertise and all processes related to referral of patient, examination, decision-making are characterized by strict compliance with legislative acts which detail all these steps are spelled out in detail. Actually, the legislation of the Russian Federation includes orders and resolutions by the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection which are significant both for employees of bureau of medical social expertise and for physicians (including rheumatologists) of ambulatory polyclinic institutions and hospitals. The awareness about these laws is detailed in professional standards for various specialties.

Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features: What the Rheumatologist Needs to Know.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This narrative review will focus on the role of the rheumatologist in evaluating patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) without a defined rheumatic disease and will outline the current classification criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) and describe what is known regarding IPAF pathobiology, natural history, prognosis, and treatment. Lastly, knowledge gaps and opportunities for future research will be discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: IPAF is a recently defined classification of ILD patients who have features suggesting an autoimmune-mediated process, but do not fulfill current rheumatic disease criteria. The goal of the IPAF criteria is to provide a uniform case definition for the study of autoimmune ILD patients who do not currently fit within standard ILD diagnostic categories, ultimately improving diagnosis and therapy. Many of these patients are referred for rheumatologic evaluation to aid the diagnostic process. The care of the IPAF patient is complex and is multidisciplinary with pulmonology, rheumatology, pathology, radiology, physical therapy, primary care, pulmonary transplant providers all serving vital roles. The rheumatologist has several roles which include classification, disease monitoring, and management.

Average time taken by a Rheumatology patient to reach a Rheumatologist in Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: To study the time taken by individuals from onset of symptoms related to rheumatic diseases to approaching a rheumatologist, and to establish the various delaying factors. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from August 1 to December 31, 2020, and comprised patients of either gender diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis or other connective tissue diseases. Demographic and clinical data, including antibody status, was recorded. Time lag in visiting a rheumatologist at different levels and factors causing the delay were identified. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Of the 235 patients, 186(79%) were females and 49(21%) were males. The overall median age was 39 years (interquartile range: 29-50 years.). Of the total, 52(22%) patients presented in <12 weeks of symptom onset to a rheumatologist. Median time for patient-related delay was 6 months (interquartile range: 1-12 months), while the median time for physician-related delay was 8 months (interquartile range: 2-42 months). The median time for appointment delay was 1 week (interquartile range: 1-2 weeks). Median duration from the start of symptoms to evaluation by a rheumatologist was 24 months (interquartile range: 6-72 months). The most common delaying factor 131(55.7%) was lack of proper assessment at the primary care level. No association was found between age and time of presentation (p>0.05), but male gender, higher socioeconomic status, higher education level and rheumatoid factor negativity presented earlier compared to the rest (p<0.05 each). CONCLUSIONS: The primary care physician's delayed referral was found to be the most important factor resulting in delayed presentation to a rheumatologist.

Public interest in rheumatic diseases and rheumatologist in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Google Trends.

To evaluate the public interest in rheumatic diseases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Google Trends was queried to analyze search trends in the United States for numerous rheumatic diseases and also the interest in a rheumatologist. Three 8-week periods in 2020 ((March 15-May 9), (May 10-July 4), and (July 5-August 29)) were compared to similar periods of the prior 4 years (2016-2019). Compared to a similar time period between 2016 and 2019, a significant decrease was found in the relative search volume for more than half of the search terms during the initial March 15-May 9, 2020 period. However, this trend appeared to reverse during the July 5-August 29, 2020 period where the relative volume for nearly half of the search terms were not statistically significant compared to similar periods of the prior 4 years. In addition, this period showed a significant increase in relative volume for the terms: Axial spondyloarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome, antiphospholipid syndrome, scleroderma, Kawasaki disease, Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, and rheumatologist. There was a significant decrease in relative search volume for many rheumatic diseases between March 15 and May 9, 2020 when compared to similar periods during the prior 4 years. However, the trends reversed after the initial period ended. There was an increase in relative search for the term "rheumatologist" between July and August 2020 suggesting the need for rheumatologists during the COVID-19 pandemic. Policymakers and healthcare providers should address the informational demands on rheumatic diseases and needs for rheumatologists by the general public during pandemics like COVID-19.

Mission statement from rheumatologists in the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh e. V.) : We live rheumatology.

Systemic disease demands systemic thinkers. In this mission statement we define rheumatology, describe the role of the German Society of Rheumatology and the rheumatologist's spirit to their discipline. Rheumatologists are dedicated to improving the quality of life of their acute, chronic, and rehabilitative patients on the basis of up to date evidence and strong physician-patient relations. We think, act and interact systemically, scientifically, consistently, transparently, reliably, inclusively, innovatively and enthusiastically.

Management of gout by Moroccan rheumatologists: a Moroccan Society for Rheumatology National Survey.

To assess the modalities and current practices in gout management reported by Moroccan rheumatologists. We performed a cross-sectional online survey using a questionnaire e-mailed to 360 rheumatologists included 30 multiple-choice questions. 105 rheumatologists responded to the survey with 29% of response rate. The number of gout patients seen per month was five (3-9); they were referred in 58.7% by a general practitioner. The clinical presentation of gout patients was dominated by gout crisis in 71%, and the association gout crisis and gouty arthropathy accounted for 19% of severe forms. 40% of rheumatologists apply the 2015ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Obesity accounted for 85.7% of the associated comorbidities. The most commonly prescribed Urate-lowering therapy (ULT) was allopurinol in 81.3% (± 12). 48% of rheumatologists reported starting allopurinol at 200 mg daily and associated it with colchicine during the first 6 months by 33.3%. The determination of uric acid levels was monitoring in 76.2% every 3 months. Administration of ULT to asymptomatic hyperuricemia was found in 69.5% when patients had renal complications, while only 14.3% recommended dietary and lifestyle measures. The median duration for therapeutic education was 15 min (10, 20). In 96.2%, the education of the patient was done orally. 93.3% of rheumatologists inform their patients on how to manage a gout attack, and 96.2% on the measures of hygiene and diet has adopted. Our survey gives an insight into the elements that should be improved in the management of gout by the Moroccan rheumatologists. It highlights the need to standardize the management of gout, hence the importance of developing Moroccan recommendations on gout.

[Mission statement from rheumatologists in the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh e. V.) : We live rheumatology. German version]. / Leitbild der Rheumatologinnen und Rheumatologen in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie e. V. (DGRh e. V.) : Wir sind die Rheumatologie.

Systemic disease demands systemic thinkers. In this mission statement we define rheumatology, describe the role of the German Society of Rheumatology and the rheumatologist's spirit to their discipline. Rheumatologists are dedicated to improving the quality of life of their acute, chronic, and rehabilitative patients on the basis of up to date evidence and strong physician-patient relations. We think, act and interact systemically, scientifically, consistently, transparently, reliably, inclusively, innovatively and enthusiastically.

GRAPPA Trainees Symposium 2019: A Report from the GRAPPA 2019 Annual Meeting.

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) held a trainees symposium at its 2019 annual meeting in Paris, France. Rheumatology and dermatology trainees engaged in psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis research presented their work. This report briefly reviews 5 oral presentations and 19 posters presented at the meeting.

GRAPPA Trainees Symposium 2018: A Report from the GRAPPA 2018 Annual Meeting.

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) held a trainee symposium at its 2018 annual meeting in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Rheumatology and dermatology trainees engaged in psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis research presented their work. This report briefly reviews 5 oral presentations and 21 posters presented at the meeting.

Standardization of red flags for referral to rheumatologists and ophthalmologists in patients with rheumatic diseases and ocular involvement: a consensus statement.

Ocular involvement is a common manifestation of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, often requiring a multidisciplinary collaboration between rheumatologists and ophthalmologists. The aim of this study was to standardize "red flags" for referral for rheumatologists and ophthalmologists using a Delphi consensus for the management of rheumatic diseases with ocular involvement. The scientific board comprised 11 Italian hospital-based rheumatologists (N = 6) and ophthalmologists (N = 5). A systematic review identified potential red flags for referral. The panel developed 19 statements consisting of (a) referral from ophthalmologist to rheumatologist (b) referral from rheumatologist to ophthalmologist and (c) overarching principles relating to multidisciplinary roles/goals and management. Voting was performed anonymously using an online Delphi method. Each participant expressed a level of agreement on each statement using a 5-point scale (1="strongly disagree"; 5="strongly agree"). Total cumulative agreement was defined as the sum of the percentage of response to items 4 ("agree") and 5 ("absolutely agree"), consensus defined as ≥ 80% cumulative agreement for each statement. Positive consensus among 11 participants was reached for 15/19 (78.9%) statements. Statements not reaching consensus were discussed in a face-to-face meeting prior to the second vote (10 participants). Positive consensus was reached for all 19 statements, with final total cumulative agreement of 90-100%. This is the first Delphi consensus undertaken to standardize red flags for referral to rheumatologists and ophthalmologists for patients with rheumatic diseases and ocular involvement.

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized trial comparing with rheumatologist-led care.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The concept of nurse-led care (NLC) was not familiar in China. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of NLC versus rheumatologist-led care (RLC) in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients of either gender (aged ≥18 years) with RA were enrolled at Wenhai Central Hospital, China (January 2015 to December 2015). The participants were then randomized to NLC or RLC. Outcomes of both the groups were compared in terms of effectiveness by measuring the Disease Activity Score 28, visual analogue scores pertaining to pain and fatigue, and duration of morning stiffness. Costs associated with resource use for RA were assessed and compared between both groups. RESULTS: A total of 214 RA patients in 2 groups (n = 107 in each group) were enrolled and analysed. Improvements in clinical outcomes (disease activity, pain, fatigue, and morning stiffness) over 12 months were significantly greater in the NLC group compared to RLC (P < 0.001). Overall, costs associated with resource use were higher in the RLC group compared to the NLC group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary finding suggested that RA patients managed by NLC compared to RLC may have better clinical outcomes and more cost-effective care in China.

Survey of the awareness of adult rheumatologists regarding transitional care for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To understand the current status of adult rheumatology care for patients who had previously had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (excluding systemic JIA), and to identify issues interfering with the transition from pediatric to adult care in Japan. METHODS: Questionnaire-based survey among 30 adult rheumatologists. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of adult rheumatologists responded that they had provided medical care to adults who had had JIA; 44% of them had felt hesitation or anxiety when providing such care. The reasons for this included lack of independence of the patients, lack of knowledge and experience among adult rheumatologists, and lack of preparation for accepting such patients. Many adult rheumatologists believed that the timing of transition from pediatric to adult rheumatology care must be considered based on therapeutic regimens or clinical conditions/disease states, not solely chronological age. A majority of adult rheumatologists showed great interest in transitional care for JIA patients and desired to communicate better with pediatric rheumatologists. CONCLUSION: Transitional care for JIA patients is not sufficiently developed in Japan. Education and advocate campaign of transitional care is required for adult rheumatologists as well as patients and their parents.

GRAPPA Trainees Symposium 2017: A Report from the GRAPPA 2017 Annual Meeting.

At the 2017 annual meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, a trainees symposium was held. Rheumatology and dermatology trainees engaged in psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis research presented their work. This report briefly reviews 6 oral presentations and 25 posters presented at the meeting.

[Ocular involvement in rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue diseases and vasculitis]. / Augenbeteiligung bei rheumatoider Arthritis, Kollagenosen und Vaskulitiden.

There are many interfaces between ophthalmologists and rheumatologists. On the one hand ophthalmologists face the question if an inflammation of the eye is caused by systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases and on the other hand rheumatologists have to consider that ocular manifestations are relatively common in some inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Furthermore, these ocular manifestations may influence therapeutic decisions of the rheumatologist. This article summarizes which ocular inflammations can be associated with rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue diseases and vasculitides. The description of acute anterior uveitis in spondyloarthritis and in juvenile idiopathic arthritis is omitted in this article but will be dealt with elsewhere in this issue.

[Differential diagnostic spectrum of psoriasis vs. psoriatic arthritis in skin and joints]. / Differenzialdiagnostisches Spektrum der Psoriasis versus Psoriasisarthritis an Haut und Gelenken.

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are common disease entities in the daily routine of dermatologists and rheumatologists. The clinical management of the diseases profits tremendously from interdisciplinary contacts and shared decision-making processes. For dermatologists, recognition of early clinical symptoms of inflammatory arthropathies is pivotal. Rheumatologists, on the other hand, are required to make an early assessment of skin and nail changes in patients, since they are important parameters in the clinical classification of inflammatory joint diseases, in particular for the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. In patients with psoriasis, lesions on the scalp, in the anal cleft, and nail changes as well as severe generalized skin disease are all regarded as risk factors for psoriatic arthritis. The symptoms of the associated joint and spinal afflictions can vary considerably and confirmation of the diagnosis, in particular in early stages of the disease often represents a considerable challenge. The most common clinical manifestations of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and their differential diagnostics are discussed.

Comparative performance of psoriatic arthritis screening tools in patients with psoriasis in European/North American dermatology clinics.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners/dermatologists may be aware of musculoskeletal symptoms in patients with psoriasis but may have difficulty accurately detecting psoriatic arthritis (PsA). OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate 3 PsA screening questionnaires-the Psoriasis and Arthritis Screening Questionnaire (PASQ), Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST), and Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screen (ToPAS)-based on rheumatologist assessment in patients with psoriasis. METHODS: Consecutive unselected patients with psoriasis, initially evaluated by dermatologists for plaque psoriasis, were randomized to receive 1 of 3 questionnaires. Patients were subsequently evaluated by rheumatologists to establish/exclude clinical PsA diagnosis. Using clinical PsA diagnosis as the standard for comparison, questionnaire accuracy was assessed by calculating sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values. RESULTS: Of 949 patients with psoriasis evaluated by rheumatologists, 285 (30%) received a clinical diagnosis of PsA (95% confidence interval 27%-33%). Probable PsA was detected in 45.1%, 43.0%, and 42.9% of patients using PASQ, PEST, and ToPAS, respectively. Sensitivity ranged from 0.67 to 0.84; specificity, 0.64 to 0.75; positive predictive value, 0.43 to 0.60; and negative predictive value, 0.83 to 0.91. LIMITATIONS: Not all patients completed all questionnaires; lack of standardized diagnostic criteria introduced possible bias. CONCLUSION: PASQ, PEST, and ToPAS are useful screening tools that can help dermatologists identify patients without PsA and patients with possible PsA who may benefit from rheumatologist assessment.

Prevalence of rheumatologist-diagnosed psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis in European/North American dermatology clinics.

BACKGROUND: Prompt identification and treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis is critical to reducing the risk of joint damage, disability, and comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate PsA prevalence in patients with plaque psoriasis in 34 dermatology centers in 7 European and North American countries. METHODS: Consecutive patients were evaluated by dermatologists for plaque psoriasis and subsequently by rheumatologists for PsA. PsA prevalence was estimated primarily based on rheumatologists' assessment of medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Of 949 patients evaluated, 285 (30%) had PsA (95% confidence interval 27-33) based on rheumatologists' assessment. PsA diagnosis changed in 1.2% of patients when diagnostic laboratory tests were added to medical history and physical examination. Of 285 patients given the diagnosis of PsA, 117 (41%) had not been previously given the diagnosis. LIMITATIONS: Bias may have been introduced by lack of standardized diagnostic criteria and unbalanced recruitment based on country populations. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, almost a third of patients with psoriasis seen in dermatology centers had PsA as determined by rheumatologists. More than a third of patients with PsA had not been previously given the diagnosis. Clinical evaluation alone is often sufficient basis for PsA diagnosis, but laboratory test results may be helpful in some patients.

The Role of Rheumatologist in Smoking Cessation of Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVES: Smoking has a well-established detrimental effect on the prognosis and treatment success in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. It is important to encourage and convince patients to quit smoking. We aimed to evaluate the contribution of rheumatologists to smoking cessation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS: This single-center cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary research hospital between March 2022 and June 2022. The data related to demographics, smoking status, duration of smoking, average number of cigarettes smoked per day, reasons for quitting smoking, and methods of quitting smoking were obtained through face-to-face interviews. RESULTS: This study was carried out on 308 patients. A total of 102 ankylosing spondylitis patients quit smoking. Of the patients who quit smoking, 39 (38.3%) patients quit smoking with a recommendation of a rheumatologist and 29 (28.4%) patients quit because of their concerns related to ankylosing spondylitis disease. The most commonly used methods for quitting smoking were herbal supplements in 40 (39.2%) patients and medication for smoking cessation in 40 (39.2%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: It has been shown that about one-fifth of ankylosing spondylitis patients are not questioned by a rheumatologist about smoking. On the other hand, it was seen that the factor with the greatest effect on those who quit smoking was the rheumatologist. Therefore, rheumatologists should question all ankylosing spondylitis patients about smoking and encourage smokers to quit in order to achieve better outcomes in the long term.

Increased Risk of Developing Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with Primary Sjögren's Syndrome-A Secondary Cohort Analysis of Nationwide, Population-Based Claims Data.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective cohort study aimed to examine the risk of developing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) compared to controls using data from a nationwide health claims database. METHODS: Four distinct cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed pSS were established using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Cohorts I and II were created to evaluate the risk of developing SLE and RA, respectively. Cohorts III and IV were assembled similarly to Cohorts I and II but employed a stricter definition, based on catastrophic illness certificate (CIC) status, for identifying patients with pSS. Comparison cohorts of patients without pSS were formed by frequency matching for sex, 5-year age interval, and index year. Incident rate ratios (IRR) for SLE or RA development were determined using Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Patients with pSS, selected from just outpatient visits or with additional CIC status showed a significantly higher risk of developing SLE or RA compared with the controls. When stratified by age group or sex, the risk of developing SLE was notably higher in the young age group (adjusted IRR 47.24, p = 0.002) and women (adjusted IRR 7.63, p = 0.003) among patients with pSS. In addition, both men and women with pSS, irrespective of age, showed a significantly elevated risk of developing RA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pSS exhibited an elevated risk of developing SLE and RA. Rheumatologists should carefully monitor patients with pSS for potential SLE and RA development.