A simple method for the selection of valid spinopelvic parameters and lumbar lordosis in patients with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae.

PURPOSE: Transitional lumbosacral vertebrae (TLSV) are a congenital anomaly of the lumbosacral region that is characterized by the presence of a vertebra with morphological properties of both the lumbar and sacral vertebrae, with a prevalence of up to 36% in asymptomatic patients and 20% in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. In patients with TLSV, because of these morphological changes and the different numbers of lumbar vertebrae, there are two optional reference sacral endplates that can be selected intently or inadvertently to measure the spinopelvic parameters: upper and lower endplates. The spinopelvic parameters measured using the upper and lower endplates are significantly different from each other as well as from the normative values. Therefore, the selection of a reference endplate changes the spinopelvic parameters, lumbar lordosis (LL), and surgical goals, which can result in surgical over- or under-correction. Because there is no consensus on the selection of sacral endplate among these patients, it is unclear as to which of these parameters should be used in diagnosis or surgical planning. The present study describes a standardization method for measuring the spinopelvic parameters and LL in patients with TLSV. METHODS: Upper and lower endplate spinopelvic parameters (i.e., pelvic incidence [PI], sacral slope [SS], and pelvic tilt) and LL of 108 patients with TLSV were measured by computed tomography. In addition, these parameters were measured for randomly selected subjects without TLSV. The PI value in the TLSV group, which was closer to the mean PI value of the control group, was accepted as valid and then used to create an optimum PI (OPI) group. Finally, the spinopelvic parameters and LL of the OPI and control groups were compared. RESULTS: Except for SS, all spinopelvic parameters and LL were comparable between the OPI and control groups. In the OPI group, 60% of the patients showed valid upper endplate parameters, and 40% showed valid lower endplate parameters. No difference was noted in the frequency of valid upper or lower endplates between the sacralization and lumbarization groups. Both the OPI and control groups showed nearly comparable correlations between their individual spinopelvic parameters and LL, except for PI and LL in the former. CONCLUSIONS: Because PI is unique for every individual, the endplate whose PI value is closer to the normative value should be selected as the reference sacral endplate in patients with TLSV.

Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope do not differ in two types of postoperative lumbar disc re-herniation: a cross-sectional observational study.

BACKGROUND: To identify the differences of lumbar lordosis (LL) and sacral slope (SS) angles between two types of postoperative lumbar disc re-herniation, including the recurrence of same level and adjacent segment herniation (ASH). METHODS: We searched the medical records of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients with re-herniation with complete imaging data (n = 58) from January 1, 2013 to December 30, 2020 in our hospital. After matching for age and sex, 58 patients with LDH without re-herniation from the same period operated by the same treatment group in our hospital were served as a control group. Re-herniation patients were divided into two groups, same-level recurrent lumbar disc herniation group (rLDHG) and adjacent segment herniation group with or without recurrence (ASHG). The preoperative, postoperative and one month after operation LL and SS were measured on standing radiographs and compared with the control group by using t-test, ANOVA, and rank-sum test. Next, we calculated the odds ratios (ORs) by unconditional logistic regression, progressively adjusted for other confounding factors. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the postoperative LL and SS were significantly lower in LDH patients with re-herniation. However, there were no differences in LL and SS between ASHG and rLDHG at any stage. After progressive adjustment for confounding factors, no matter what stage is, LL and SS remained unassociated with the two types of re-herniation. CONCLUSIONS: Low postoperative LL and SS angles are associated with degeneration of the remaining disc. Low LL and SS may be independent risk factors for re-herniation but cannot determine type of recurrence (same or adjacent disc level).

Effect of different lumbar-iliac fixation and sacral slope for Tile C1.3 pelvic fractures: a biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar-iliac fixation (LIF) is a common treatment for Tile C1.3 pelvic fractures, but different techniques, including L4-L5/L5 unilateral LIF (L4-L5/L5 ULIF), bilateral LIF (BLIF), and L4-L5/L5 triangular osteosynthesis (L4-L5/L5 TOS), still lack biomechanical evaluation. The sacral slope (SS) is key to the vertical shear of the sacrum but has not been investigated for its biomechanical role in lumbar-iliac fixation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical effects of different LIF and SS on Tile C1.3 pelvic fracture under two-legged standing load in human cadavers. METHODS: Eight male fresh-frozen human lumbar-pelvic specimens were used in this study. Compressive force of 500 N was applied to the L4 vertebrae in the two-legged standing position of the pelvis. The Tile C1.3 pelvic fracture was prepared, and the posterior pelvic ring was fixed with L5 ULIF, L4-L5 ULIF, L5 TOS, L4-L5 TOS, and L4-L5 BLIF, respectively. Displacement and rotation of the anterior S1 foramen at 30° and 40° sacral slope (SS) were analyzed. RESULTS: The displacement of L4-L5/L5 TOS in the left-right and vertical direction, total displacement, and rotation in lateral bending decreased significantly, which is more pronounced at 40° SS. The difference in stability between L4-L5 and L5 ULIF was not significant. BLIF significantly limited left-right displacement. The ULIF vertical displacement at 40° SS was significantly higher than that at 30° SS. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed an in vitro two-legged standing pelvic model and demonstrated that TOS enhanced pelvic stability in the coronal plane and cephalad-caudal direction, and BLIF enhanced stability in the left-right direction. L4-L5 ULIF did not further improve the immediate stability, whereas TOS is required to increase the vertical stability at greater SS.

Performance evaluation of a deep learning-based cascaded HRNet model for automatic measurement of X-ray imaging parameters of lumbar sagittal curvature.

PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning-based cascaded HRNet model, in order to automatically measure X-ray imaging parameters of lumbar sagittal curvature and to evaluate its prediction performance. METHODS: A total of 3730 lumbar lateral digital radiography (DR) images were collected from picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Among them, 3150 images were randomly selected as the training dataset and validation dataset, and 580 images as the test dataset. The landmarks of the lumbar curve index (LCI), lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis index (LLI), and the posterior edge tangent angle of the vertebral body (PTA) were identified and marked. The measured results of landmarks on the test dataset were compared with the mean values of manual measurement as the reference standard. Percentage of correct key-points (PCK), intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation coefficient (r), mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate the performance of the cascade HRNet model. RESULTS: The PCK of the cascaded HRNet model was 97.9-100% in the 3 mm distance threshold. The mean differences between the reference standard and the predicted values for LCI, LLA, SS, LLI, and PTA were 0.43 mm, 0.99°, 1.11°, 0.01 mm, and 0.23°, respectively. There were strong correlation and consistency of the five parameters between the cascaded HRNet model and manual measurements (ICC = 0.989-0.999, R = 0.991-0.999, MAE = 0.63-1.65, MSE = 0.61-4.06, RMSE = 0.78-2.01). CONCLUSION: The cascaded HRNet model based on deep learning algorithm could accurately identify the sagittal curvature-related landmarks on lateral lumbar DR images and automatically measure the relevant parameters, which is of great significance in clinical application.

Pubic Symphysis to Sacrococcygeal Joint: A Poor Correlate to Other Spinopelvic Measurements.

BACKGROUND: The hip-spine relationship is increasingly recognized as critical for optimizing stability following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, these measurements are not routinely obtained during THA workup. It has been suggested that insight can be gained from supine antero-posterior pelvis radiograph, measuring the distance from the superior border of the pubic symphysis to the sacro-coccygeal joint (PSCD). This study assessed the correlation between PSCD and lateral lumbar radiographic metrics in a cohort of preoperative THA patients. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 250 consecutive patients who underwent THA with preoperative supine antero-posterior pelvis and lateral lumbar radiographs. The mean age was 68 years (range, 42 to 89), 61% were women, and the mean body mass index was 30 kg/m2 (range, 19 to 52). Two reviewers measured PSCD, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and lumbar lordosis (LL). Inter-observer reliability was calculated for all measurements, and correlation coefficients were calculated for PSCD with respect to PT, SS, PI, and LL. RESULTS: Correlations between PSCD and lumbar radiographic metrics were all statistically significant, except for PI in men but graded as "weak" or "very weak" for men and women, respectively, as follows: PT = -0.30 (P < .01) and -0.46 (P < .01); SS = 0.27 (P < .01) and 0.22 (P < .01); PI = -0.04 (P = .70) and -0.19 (P = .02); and LL = 0.45 (P < .01) and 0.30 (P < .01). Inter-observer reliability was graded as "strong" for every metric. CONCLUSION: The PSCD was weakly correlated with all evaluated lateral lumbar radiographic metrics in both sexes, despite strong inter-observer reliability. Therefore, PSCD cannot reliably serve as a proxy for evaluating the hip-spine relationship.

Sacral Slope Change From Standing to Relaxed-Seated Grossly Overpredicts the Presence of a Stiff Spine.

BACKGROUND: Several authors propose that a change in sacral slope of ≤10° between the standing and relaxed-seated positions (ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated) identifies a patient with a stiff lumbar spine and has suggested the use of dual-mobility bearings for such patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to assess how accurately ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated can identify patients with a stiff spine. METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, consecutive cohort series of 312 patients had standing, relaxed-seated, and flexed-seated lateral radiographs prior to THA. ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated was determined by the change in sacral slope between the standing and relaxed-seated positions. Lumbar flexion (LF) was defined as the difference in lumbar lordotic angle between standing and flexed-seated. LF ≤20° was considered a stiff spine. The predictive value of ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated for characterizing a stiff spine was assessed. RESULTS: A weak correlation between ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated and LF was identified (r2 = 0.13). Eighty six patients (28%) had ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated ≤10° and 19 patients (6%) had a stiff spine. Of the 86 patients with ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated ≤10°, 13 had a stiff spine. The positive predictive value of ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated ≤10° for identifying a stiff spine was 15%. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated ≤10° was not correlated with a stiff spine. Using this simplified approach could lead to a 7-fold overprediction of patients with a stiff lumbar spine and abnormal spinopelvic mobility, unnecessary use of dual-mobility bearings, and incorrect component alignment targets. Referring to patients with ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated ≤10° as being stiff is misleading. The flexed-seated position should be used to effectively assess a patient's spine mobility prior to THA.

The Current Proposed Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Planning Guidelines Based on Classification of Spine Stiffness May be Flawed Due to Incorrect Assumptions.

BACKGROUND: The available classifications and preoperative planning tools for total hip arthroplasty assume that: 1) there is no variation in the sagittal pelvic tilt (SPT) if the radiographs are repeated, and 2) there is no significant change in the postoperative SPT postoperatively. We hypothesized that there would be significant differences in postoperative SPT tilt as measured by the sacral slope, thus rendering the current classifications and tools flawed. METHODS: This study was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of preoperative and postoperative (1.5-6 months) full-body imaging of 237 primary total hip arthroplasty (standing and sitting positions). Patients were categorized as 1) stiff spine (standing sacral slope sitting sacral slope < 10°) and 2) normal spine (standing sacral slope-sitting sacral slope ≥ 10°). Results were compared using the paired t-test. The posthoc power analysis showed a power of 0.99. RESULTS: The difference in mean standing and sitting sacral slope between the preoperative and postoperative measurements was 1°. However, in standing position, this difference was more than 10° in 14.4% of patients. In the sitting position, this difference was more than 10° in 34.2% of patients and more than 20° in 9.8% of patients. Postoperatively, 32.5% of patients switched groups based on the classification, which rendered the preoperative planning suggested by the current classifications flawed. CONCLUSION: Current preoperative planning and classifications are based on a single acquisition of preoperative radiographs without the incorporation of possible postoperative changes in SPT. Validated classifications and planning tools should incorporate repeated measurements to determine the mean and variance in SPT and consider the significant postoperative changes in SPT.

Dimple of Venus Is Associated with the Increased Pelvic Incidence Angle and More Sagittally Oriented Facet Joint.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to investigate whether the dimple of Venus affects the anatomy of spinopelvic junction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria were having a lumbar MRI examination in the last 1 year, being older than 18 years of age and being able to radiologically evaluate the whole vertebral colon and pelvic girdle. Exclusion criteria were having congenital diseases of the pelvic girdle/hip/vertebral column and history of fracture or previous surgery in the same anatomic regions. The patients' demographic data and low back pain were noted. At radiological examination, the pelvic incidence angle was measured by lateral lumbar X-ray. The facet joint angle, tropism, facet joint degeneration, intervertebral disc degeneration, and intervertebral disc herniation at the level of L5-S1 were examined on lumbar MRIs. RESULTS: We included 134 male and 236 female patients with a mean age of 47.86 ± 14.50 years and 48.49 ± 13.49 years, respectively. We found that the patients with the dimple of Venus had higher pelvic incidence angle (p < 0.001) and more sagittally oriented facet joint (right facet joint p = 0.017, left facet joint p = 0.001) compared to those without the dimple of Venus. There was no statistically significant relationship between low back pain and the presence of the dimple of Venus. CONCLUSIONS: The dimple of Venus affects the anatomy of the spinopelvic junction and is associated with an increased pelvic incidence angle and a more sagittally oriented facet joint angle.

Thoracic kyphosis in light of lumbosacral alignment in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: recognition of thoracic hypokyphosis and therapeutic implications.

BACKGROUND: The uniqueness of spinal sagittal alignment in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), for example, the drastically smaller thoracic kyphosis seen in some patients, has been recognized but not yet fully understood. The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics of sagittal alignment of thoracic AIS and to determine the contributing factors. METHODS: Whole spine radiographs of 83 thoracic AIS patients (73 females) were analyzed. The measured radiographic parameters were the Cobb angle of thoracic scoliosis, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), C7 sagittal vertical axis (C7 SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS). Additionally, max-LL, which was defined as the maximum lordosis angle from the S1 endplate, the inflection point between thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis, and the SVA of the inflection point (IP SVA) were measured. The factors significantly related to a decrease in TK were assessed by stepwise logistic regression analysis. In addition, cluster analysis was performed to classify the global sagittal alignment. RESULTS: The significant factors for a decrease in TK were an increase in SS (p = 0.0003, [OR]: 1.16) and a decrease in max-LL (p = 0.0005, [OR]: 0.89). According to the cluster analysis, the global sagittal alignment was categorized into the following three types: Type 1 (low SS, low max-LL, n = 28); Type 2 (high SS, low max-LL, n = 22); and Type 3 (high SS, high max-LL, n = 33). CONCLUSIONS: In thoracic AIS, a decreased TK corresponded to an increased SS or a decreased max-LL. The sagittal alignment of thoracic AIS patients could be classified into three types based on SS and max-LL. One of these three types includes the unique sagittal profile of very small TK.

Does spinopelvic motion change after total hip arthroplasty?

PURPOSE: Spinopelvic motion plays an important role in functional acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Sacral slope (SS) has been a useful surrogate for spinopelvic motion. The present study aimed to investigate statistical characteristics of spinopelvic motion before and after THA using changes in SS in supine, standing, and sitting positions. METHODS: A total of 76 patients (88 hips) were assessed. To classify spinopelvic mobility, defined as a change in SS from standing to sitting position (ΔSSstand/sit), 10° ≤ ΔSSstand/sit ≤ 30°, ΔSSstand/sit < 10°, and ΔSSstand/sit > 30° were considered normal, stiff, and hypermobile, respectively. RESULTS: Over ± 7° changes in SS between before and one year after THA were observed in 39 (44.3%) hips in the sitting position, 19 (21.6%) hips in the supine position, seven (7.9%) in the standing position. Percentages of hips with stiff spinopelvic mobility (11.4% vs. 22.7%) and hypermobile spinopelvic mobility (23.9% vs. 12.5%) between before THA and one year after THA were significantly different (p = 0.034 and p = 0.016, McNemar's test). At one year after THA, 40.0% (4/10) of hips with stiff spinopelvic mobility and 57.1% (12/21) of hips with hypermobile spinopelvic mobility shifted to normal spinopelvic mobility. CONCLUSIONS: Change in SS between before THA and one year after THA had a high inter-subject variability especially in the sitting position. In addition, there was a distinct shift to normal spinopelvic mobility postoperatively in hips with stiff and hypermobile spinopelvic mobility pre-operatively.

Predictors for quality of life improvement after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a prospective multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) can significantly impair a patient's quality of life (QOL). In this study, we aimed to identify predictors associated with QOL improvement after surgery for DCM. METHODS: This study included 148 patients who underwent surgery for DCM. The European QOL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score, the Japanese Orthopedic Association for the assessment of cervical myelopathy (C-JOA) score, and the Nurick grade were used as outcome measures. Radiographic examinations were performed at enrollment. The associations of baseline variables with changes in EQ-5D scores from preoperative to 1-year postoperative assessment were investigated using a multivariable linear regression model. RESULTS: The EQ-5D and C-JOA scores and the Nurick grade improved after surgery (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Univariable analysis revealed that preoperative EQ-5D and C-JOA scores were significantly associated with increased EQ-5D scores from preoperative assessment to 1 year after surgery (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.045). Multivariable regression analysis showed that the independent preoperative predictors of change in QOL were lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA). According to the prediction model, the increased EQ-5D score from preoperatively to 1 year after surgery = 0.308 - 0.493 × EQ-5D + 0.006 × LL - 0.008 × SS + 0.004 × TPA. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative LL, SS, and TPA significantly impacted the QOL of patients who underwent surgery for DCM. Less improvement in QOL after surgery was achieved in patients with smaller LL and TPA and larger SS values. Patients with these risk factors may therefore require additional support to experience adequate improvement in QOL.

Patterns of coronal and sagittal deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic scoliosis has been shown to be associated with hypokyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the relationship of sagittal spino-pelvic parameters with different coronal curve patterns and their influence on patient-perceived quality of life is unknown. This study aims to determine the association between coronal and sagittal malalignment in patients with AIS and to determine their effects on SRS-22r scores. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1054 consecutive patients with AIS. The coronal Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were measured on standing radiographs. The coronal Cobb angle (mild: 10-20°; moderate: > 20-40°; severe: > 40°) and PI (low: < 35°; average: 35-50°; high: > 50°) were divided into 3 sub-groups for comparison. Relationship between coronal curve magnitudes and sagittal parameters was studied as was their association with SRS-22r scores. RESULTS: Low PI had smaller SS (30.1 ± 8.3° vs 44.8 ± 7.7°; p < 0.001), PT (- 0.3 ± 8.1° vs 14.4 ± 7.5°; p < 0.001), and LL (42.0 ± 13.2° vs 55.1 ± 10.6°; p < 0.001), negative PI-LL mismatch (- 12.1 ± 13.1° vs 4.1 ± 10.5°; p < 0.001) as compared to large PI. There were no significant relationships with PI and TK (p = 0.905) or curve magnitude (p = 0.431). No differences in sagittal parameters were observed for mild, moderate or severe coronal Cobb angles. SRS-22r scores only correlated with coronal Cobb angle and larger Cobb angles were negatively correlated with the function, appearance and pain domains. CONCLUSIONS: The sagittal profile for AIS is associated with the pelvic parameters especially PI but not with the coronal curve pattern. All patients have a similar TK regardless of coronal curve type. However, it appears that the coronal deformity is a greater influence on quality of life outcomes especially those > 40°.

Optimal indicators for identification of compensatory sagittal balance in patients with degenerative disc disease.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. BACKGROUND: To determine whether radiological parameters such as maximal lumbar lordosis-maximal thoracic kyphosis (maxLL-maxTK), sacral slope-pelvic tilt(SS-PT) and sacral slope/pelvic tilt (SS/PT) could be used as indicators for the diagnosis of degenerative disc disease (DDD) in compensatory sagittal balanced patients. METHODS: Medical records of sagittal balanced DDD patients and asymptomatic adults within our hospital registry from July 2019 to November 2019 were reviewed. General characteristics and radiological parameters were evaluated between the two groups. Analysis of covariance with age as a covariate was conducted, followed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and areas under the curve (AUC) calculation. The max Youden index was calculated to identify the optimal sensitivity specificity pairs. RESULTS: A total of 42 DDD patients and 199 asymptomatic adults were included. For those parameters that showed significant differences between the two groups, AUC for SS/PT and SS-PT were the largest, reaching 0.919 and 0.936, respectively. The sensitivity was 0.749, the specificity was 0.952 and the max Youden index was 0.701 when SS/PT = 1.635 was used as threshold. The max Youden index was found for a threshold of SS-PT =8.500, for which the sensitivity increased to 0.854, while the specificity decreased to 0.857. CONCLUSIONS: Both SS/PT and SS-PT were significantly different between sagittal balanced DDD patients and asymptomatic adults. SS/PT < 1.6 and SS-PT < 8.5 could be used as indicators for the diagnosis of DDD patients with compensatory sagittal balance.

Spinal-pelvic orientation: potential effect on the diagnosis of spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess associations of spinal-pelvic orientation with clinical and imaging-study findings suggesting axial SpA (axSpA) in patients with recent-onset inflammatory back pain. METHODS: Spinal-pelvic orientation was assessed in DESIR cohort patients with recent-onset inflammatory back pain and suspected axSpA, by using lateral lumbar-spine radiographs to categorize sacral horizontal angle (<40° vs ⩾40°), lumbosacral angle (<15° vs ⩾15°) and lumbar lordosis (LL, <50° vs ⩾50°). Associations between these angle groups and variables collected at baseline and 2 years later were assessed using the χ2 test (or Fisher's exact) and the Mann-Whitney test. With Bonferroni's correction, P < 0.001 indicated significant differences. RESULTS: Of 362 patients, 358, 356 and 357 had available sacral horizontal angle, lumbosacral angle and LL values, respectively; means were 39.3°, 14.6° and 53.0°, respectively. The prevalence of sacroiliitis on both radiographs and MRI was higher in the LL < 50° group than in the LL ⩾50° group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Clinical presentation and confidence in a diagnosis of axSpA did not differ across angle groups. No significant differences were identified for degenerative changes according to sacral horizontal angle, lumbosacral angle or LL. CONCLUSION: Spinal-pelvic balance was not statistically associated with the clinical or imaging-study findings suggesting axSpA in patients with recent-onset inflammatory back pain.

C7 sacral tilt (C7ST): a novel spinopelvic parameter reveals the relationship between pelvic parameters and global spinal sagittal balance and converts pelvic parameters into spinal parameters.

PURPOSE: The aim is to propose a novel spinopelvic parameter C7 sacral tilt (C7ST), of which its sum with global tilt (GT) is equal to pelvic incidence (PI), from a geometrical point of view. METHODS: A cohort of 198 patients was recruited and the whole lateral spine and pelvic radiographs were performed. The following sagittal parameters were measured: sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C7 vertical tilt (C7VT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), PI, GT and C7ST. The correlations between them were analyzed using the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient, and simple linear regressions were simultaneously conducted. P < 0.05 was set as the level of significance. RESULTS: Geometric construction by complementary angles revealed that PI = C7ST + GT, GT = PT + C7VT, and C7ST = SS - C7VT. Both C7ST and GT were moderately correlated with PI (R = 0.52 and 0.596, respectively), strongly correlated with SS and PT, respectively (SS = 0.9 * C7ST + 1.15, R = 0.955; PT = 0.87 * GT + 3.86, R = 0.96). The correlation coefficients of the SVA and C7VT, SVA and SS - C7ST, and SVA and GT - PT were 0.935, 0.925 and 0.863, respectively. CONCLUSION: The novel proposed spinopelvic parameter C7ST has the advantages of convenient measurement, reduced error, and extrapolation of other parameters. The greatest significance of proposing C7ST is that pelvic parameters (PI, PT and SS) are converted into spinal parameters (C7ST and GT), which is very helpful for a more intuitive understanding of the progression of spinal sagittal imbalance.

Sagittal spinal-pelvic alignment in patients with Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip.

BACKGROUND: The impact of high dislocated dysplastic hips on spinal-pelvic alignment has not been well described. This study aims to evaluate compensatory spinal radiographic changes and presence of back pain in patients with Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). METHODS: An observational study was conducted from July 2016 to December 2017, and 49 consecutive patients with Crowe IV DDH were enrolled. Forty-nine sex- and age-matched asymptomatic healthy adults were recruited as the controls. The sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), spino-sacral angle (SSA), C7 tilt (C7T), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA [C7]) were measured on lateral whole spine radiographs. The presence of low back pain and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were recorded. RESULTS: The patients with Crowe IV DDH showed significantly greater SS (47.5 ± 7.5° vs. 40.4 ± 6.7°, p < 0.05), LL (- 63.7 ± 9.2° vs. - 53.3 ± 11.5°, P < 0.05), SSA (141.8° ± 7.2° vs. 130.6 ± 7.9°, p < 0.05), C7T (93.9 ± 3.6° vs. 91.1 ± 3.7°, P < 0.05), and lower SVA(C7) (- 16 mm[- 95-45] vs. 6.4 mm[- 52-47], p < 0.05) compared to the controls. The patients with bilateral Crowe IV DDH also exhibited larger SS, LL, SSA, and C7T and a smaller SVA (C7) than those with unilateral Crowe IV DDH. Sixty-three percent of the patients with Crowe IV DDH reported low back pain. CONCLUSION: The patients with Crowe IV DDH exhibited abnormal spinal-pelvic alignment characterized by anterior pelvic tilt, lumbar hyperlordosis, and a backward-leaning trunk. Bilateral Crowe IV DDH had a greater impact on spinal-pelvic alignment than unilateral Crowe IV DDH.

Spinopelvic parameters in greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a condition resulting in lateral hip pain, most commonly caused by tendinosis or tear of the gluteus medius and minimus tendons, and greater trochanteric bursitis. Our aim was to assess pelvic parameters and proximal femoral anatomy in patients suffering from surgical-stage GTPS compared with a control group. METHODS: This retrospective, case-control study assessed 43 patients suffering from GTPS, matched according to age, gender, body mass index and level of sport and physical activity to 43 control patients, between 2013 and 2018. Pelvic parameters, including pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS), and proximal femoral anatomy, including femoral offset (FO) and neck-shaft angle (NSA), were measured using the EOS Imaging™ system. RESULTS: GTPS patients had a significantly lower mean (± SD) SS than control patients (33.1 ± 10.4 vs. 39.6 ± 9.7°, respectively; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in PT (21.3 ± 7.1 vs. 19.0 ± 7.2°), PI (53.5 ± 11.6 vs. 57.7 ± 10.5°), FO (40.4 ± 8 vs. 42.2 ± 6.8°) or NSA (125.1 ± 5.8 vs. 124.4 ± 4.7°). There was no difference in lower back pain symptoms in a subgroup analysis of GTPS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral slope was lower in patients with surgical-stage GTPS than in asymptomatic hip patients, using the EOS Imaging™ system.

Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to prevent loss of segmental lordosis (SL) with minimally invasive interbody fusions, manufacturers have increased the amount of lordosis that is built into interbody cages. However, the relationship between cage lordotic angle and actual SL achieved intraoperatively remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine if the lordotic angle manufactured into an interbody cage impacts the change in SL during minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) done for degenerative pathology. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of a single-surgeon database of adult patients who underwent primary LIF between April 2017 and December 2018. Procedures were performed for 1-2-level lumbar degenerative disease using contemporary MIS techniques, including transforaminal LIF (TLIF), lateral LIF (LLIF), and anterior LIF (ALIF). Surgical levels were classified on lateral radiographs based on the cage lordotic angle (6°-8°, 10°-12°, and 15°-20°) and the position of the cage in the disc space (anterior vs posterior). Change in SL was the primary outcome of interest. Subgroup analyses of the cage lordotic angle within each surgical approach were also conducted. RESULTS: A total of 116 surgical levels in 98 patients were included. Surgical approaches included TLIF (56.1%), LLIF (32.7%), and ALIF (11.2%). There were no differences in SL gained by cage lordotic angle (2.7° SL gain with 6°-8° cages, 1.6° with 10°-12° cages, and 3.4° with 15°-20° cages, p = 0.581). Subgroup analysis of LLIF showed increased SL with 15° cages only (p = 0.002). The change in SL was highest after ALIF (average increase 9.8° in SL vs 1.8° in TLIF vs 1.8° in LLIF, p < 0.001). Anterior position of the cage in the disc space was also associated with a significantly greater gain in SL (4.2° vs -0.3°, p = 0.001), and was the only factor independently correlated with SL gain (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with cage lordotic angle, cage position and approach play larger roles in the generation of SL in 1-2-level MIS for lumbar degenerative disease.

Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.

OBJECTIVE: In this study the authors compared the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) techniques in a homogeneous group of patients affected by single-level L5-S1 degenerative disc disease (DDD) and postdiscectomy syndrome (PDS). The purpose of the study was to analyze perioperative, functional, and radiological data between the two techniques. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patient data was performed between 2015 and 2018. Patients were clustered into two homogeneous groups (group 1 = ALIF, group 2 = TLIF) according to surgical procedure. A statistical analysis of clinical perioperative and radiological findings was performed to compare the two groups. A senior musculoskeletal radiologist retrospectively revised all radiological images. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were comparable in terms of demographic features and surgical diagnosis and included in the study, involving 32 (44.4%) male and 40 (55.6%) female patients with an average age of 47.7 years. The mean follow-up duration was 49.7 months. Thirty-six patients (50%) were clustered in group 1, including 31 (86%) with DDD and 5 (14%) with PDS. Thirty-six patients (50%) were clustered in group 2, including 28 (78%) with DDD and 8 (22%) with PDS. A significant reduction in surgical time (107.4 vs 181.1 minutes) and blood loss (188.9 vs 387.1 ml) in group 1 (p < 0.0001) was observed. No significant differences in complications and reoperation rates between the two groups (p = 0.561) was observed. A significant improvement in functional outcome was observed in both groups (p < 0.001), but no significant difference between the two groups was found at the last follow-up. In group 1, a faster median time of return to work (2.4 vs 3.2 months) was recorded. A significant improvement in L5-S1 postoperative lordosis restoration was registered in the ALIF group (9.0 vs 5.0, p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: According to these results, interbody fusion is effective in the surgical management of discogenic pain. Even if clinical benefits were achieved earlier in the ALIF group (better scores and faster return to work), both procedures improved functional outcomes at last follow-up. The ALIF group showed significant reduction of blood loss, shorter surgical time, and better segmental lordosis restoration when compared to the TLIF group. No significant differences in postoperative complications were observed between the groups. Based on these results, the ALIF technique enhances radiological outcome improvement in spinopelvic parameters when compared to TLIF in the management of adult patients with L5-S1 DDD.

The association between lower Hounsfield units of the upper instrumented vertebra and proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing long-segment fusions from the lower thoracic (LT) spine to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction are at risk for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). One mechanism of PJK is fracture of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) or higher (UIV+1), which may be related to bone mineral density (BMD). Because Hounsfield units (HUs) on CT correlate with BMD, the authors evaluated whether HU values were correlated with PJK after long fusions for ASD. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective study of patients older than 50 years who had undergone ASD correction from the LT spine to the sacrum in the period from October 2007 to January 2018 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Demographic and spinopelvic parameters were measured. HU values were measured on preoperative CT at the UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2 (2 levels above the UIV) levels and were assessed for correlations with PJK. RESULTS: The records of 127 patients were reviewed. Fifty-four patients (19 males and 35 females) with a mean age of 64.91 years and mean follow-up of 3.19 years met the study inclusion criteria; there were 29 patients with PJK and 25 patients without. There was no statistically significant difference in demographics or follow-up between these two groups. Neither was there a difference between the groups with regard to postoperative pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI minus LL (PI-LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), or sagittal vertical axis (SVA; all p > 0.05). Postoperative pelvic tilt (p = 0.003) and T1 pelvic angle (p = 0.014) were significantly higher in patients with PJK than in those without. Preoperative HUs at UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2 were 120.41, 124.52, and 129.28 in the patients with PJK, respectively, and 152.80, 155.96, and 160.00 in the patients without PJK, respectively (p = 0.011, 0.02, and 0.018). Three receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for preoperative HU values at the UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2 as a predictor for PJK were established, with areas under the ROC curve of 0.710 (95% CI 0.574-0.847), 0.679 (95% CI 0.536-0.821), and 0.681 (95% CI 0.539-0.824), respectively. The optimal HU value by Youden index was 104 HU at the UIV (sensitivity 0.840, specificity 0.517), 113 HU at the UIV+1 (sensitivity 0.720, specificity 0.517), and 110 HU at the UIV+2 (sensitivity 0.880, specificity 0.448). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing long-segment fusions from the LT spine to the sacrum for ASD, PJK was associated with lower HU values on CT at the UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2. The measurement of HU values on preoperative CTs may be a useful adjunct for ASD surgery planning.