EUFOREA/EPOS2020 statement on the clinical considerations for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps care.

Following the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) treatment algorithm for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), patients suffering from severe uncontrolled CRSwNP are recommended to receive oral corticosteroids, (revision) sinus surgery, systemic biologicals and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization (ATAD). Given the major differences in indications, outcomes, practical considerations, risks and costs of these key pillars of treatment, there is a growing need to define criteria for each treatment option and list the clinically relevant and major considerations for them. This EUFOREA document therefore provides an expert panel overview of the expected outcomes, specific considerations and (contra)indications of the five major treatment arms of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP: oral corticosteroids, primary and revision sinus surgery, biological treatment and ATAD. This overview of treatment considerations is needed to allow physicians and patients to consider the different options in the context of providing optimal and personalized care for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP. In conclusion, the five major treatment options for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP have intrinsic advantages, specific indications and considerations that are of importance to the patient, the physician and the society. This EUFOREA statement supports the unmet need to define criteria for the indication of every treatment pillar of CRSwNP.

Systematic Review of Long Term Sinonasal Outcomes in CRSwNP after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A call for Unified and Standardized Criteria and Terms.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To present current evidence in long-term (> 5 years) results after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) focusing on Patients Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and other sinonasal outcomes while assessing the role of ESS in the treatment of CRSwNP, and identifying outcomes which affect the results of ESS and defining recommendations for future studies. RECENT FINDINGS: Long-term results of ESS in CRSwNP can be branched in PROMs and other objective measurements. Despite the heterogeneity of reported outcomes make it difficult to perform comparisons and meta-analysis, ESS improves PROMs, including symptoms, QOL and olfaction. Objectives outcomes such as NPS, LMS, type of surgery, or recurrence and revision surgery don't have a clear role in long-term results. Clustering patients suggest asthma, N-ERD, allergy, eosinophil count and IL-5 could have a role in predicting recurrence and severe disease. Long-term studies of CRSwNP treated with ESS are scarce. There is a significant need to standardize the report of results. The use of tools as SNOT-22, NPS, validated smell tests, defined criteria for disease recurrence and control and ESS extension in a unified systematic way could allow better comparisons between treatments in the new era of biologics.

Anteriorly Tilted Coronal CT of Paranasal Sinuses for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Conventional coronal CT scans of paranasal sinuses, aligned perpendicularly to the nasal floor, often deviate significantly from the endoscopic view during sinus surgery. This discrepancy complicates the interpretation of anatomical structures. In response, we propose the utilization of anteriorly tilted coronal CT slices to enhance anatomical understanding. These slices align more closely with the endoscopic view, fostering an intuitive grasp of paranasal sinus anatomy. This study aims to quantify the tilt of the endoscope to the nasal floor during endoscopic sinus surgery. To figure out the tilt of the endoscopically true coronal slices, we calculated the tilt of the endoscope to the nasal floor in the operative setting by taking pictures of the operation and measuring the image and sagittal CT. Fourteen patients (25 sides of paranasal sinuses) were analyzed. Endoscope tilts to the nasal floor were measured at different anatomical landmarks: 16.2 ± 9.7 degrees (lower edge of ground lamella), 29.8 ± 7.9 degrees (central ground lamella), 62.3 ± 10.1 degrees (most superior part), and 25.6 ± 7.0 degrees (optic canal). In conclusion, we showed the actual tilt of the endoscope to the nasal floor during endoscopic sinus surgery. A 30-degree anteriorly tilted coronal scan for frontal recess and sphenoid sinus is more intuitive than a traditional coronal scan, which helps surgeons understand the complex sinus anatomy.

Endoscopic resection of primary sinonasal mucosal melanoma with orbital invasion: How I do it.

Primary sinonasal mucosal melanoma is a rare aggressive malignancy. In this video, a case of a 68-year-old female who presented with diplopia for 2 weeks is described. The present video reports the endoscopic endonasal surgical excision of a primary sinonasal mucosal melanoma. The video contains patient's medical history, preoperative radiological evaluations and step-by-step description of surgical steps of the procedure with the utilization of computer-assisted navigation system.

Number of sinus procedures reduces inpatient mortality for invasive fungal rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate surgical outcomes of invasive fungal rhinosinusitis MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample Database (2000-2015 Q3) was queried for patients with a diagnosis of aspergillosis and/or mucormycosis and a diagnosis of acute sinusitis using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition. Factors associated with inpatient mortality were then identified with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: 514 adult patients with a median age of 57.0 years were identified, of which 231 (44.9 %) underwent sinus surgery. Surgical patients had a longer length of stay (17.0 vs 9.0 days, p < 0.001) and higher total charges ($139,762.00 vs $57,945.00, p < 0.001). The number of sinus procedures was associated with reduced odds of inpatient mortality (OR 0.69; p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. Hypertension (OR 0.34, p = 0.002) and chronic kidney disease (OR 0.23, p = 0.034) were associated with reduced odds of inpatient mortality. Total number of procedures (OR 1.24; p = 0.002), mucormycosis (OR 2.75, p = 0.002), age (OR 1.03, p = 0.006) and acid-base disorders (OR 2.85, p = 0.012) were associated with increased odds of inpatient mortality. CONCLUSION: This represents the first large scale study to evaluate outcomes for invasive fungal rhinosinusitis. These findings suggest the odds of inpatient mortality decrease with greater extent of sinus surgery performed. The potentially protective roles of hypertension and chronic kidney disease should be evaluated in future research.

Indocyanine green fluorescence visualizes landmark arteries for endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Landmark arteries during endoscopic sinus surgery are currently identified on the basis of anatomy, CT imaging and navigation, and Doppler flowmetry. However, the advantage of intraoperative fluorescence imaging during endoscopic sinus surgery has not been demonstrated. This study aimed to investigate whether Indocyanine Green (ICG) is useful for visualizing landmark arteries during endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery. METHODS: Eight patients who underwent endoscopic sinus and pituitary surgeries and consented to study participation were included. After planned procedures were performed as usual, landmark arteries were examined by ICG endoscope. Recorded video and preoperative CT images were analyzed for identification of five landmark arteries: anterior ethmoidal artery (AEA), posterior ethmoidal artery (PEA), internal carotid artery (ICA), sphenopalatine artery (SPA), and postnasal artery (PNA). Identification of arteries was evaluated three grades: identifiable, locatable, unrecognizable. RESULTS: Eight patients and eleven sides were evaluated. The ICG dose was 2.5 mg/body and a single shot was sufficient for evaluation. 100 % of AEA was identified (9/9 sides), 86 % of PNA (6/7 sides), 56 % of ICA (5/9 sides), and 25 % of PEA and SPA (2/8 sides). CONCLUSION: ICG could visualize landmark arteries, even thin arteries like AEA, during endoscopic sinus and skull base surgeries. Visualization was affected by thickness of bone or soft tissue above arteries, blood clots, sensitivity setting, and angle and distance of near-infrared light irradiation. ICG visualization of landmark arteries may help avoid vascular injuries during endoscopic sinus and skull base surgeries, particularly of AEA, PNA and ICA.

Chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis and granulomatous invasive fungal sinusitis: A systematic review of symptomatology and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (CIFRS) and granulomatous invasive fungal sinusitis are two uncommon diseases differentiated primarily by the pathologic finding of non-caseating granulomas in GIFRS. Both share many similarities in presentation. We aim to characterize the symptomatology and outcomes of these diseases. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was designed to identify studies in the Cochrane, EMBASE and PubMed databases from database inception to January 2022. Inclusion criteria included all patients with a diagnosis of either CIFRS or GIFRS. All studies were screened by two reviewers. Chi-square analyses were used where appropriate. RESULTS: 51 studies were included totaling 513 patients. The majority were diagnosed with CIFRS (389, 75.8 %) compared to GIFRS (124, 24.4 %). CIFRS was more common in immunocompromised or diabetic patients (p < 0.0001; p = 0.02). Patients with CIFRS were more likely to exhibit nasal symptoms including discharge (p = 0.0001), obstruction (p = 0.03) and congestion (p = 0.001) as well as systemic symptoms including fever, which no GIFRS patient exhibited, facial pain (p = 0.007), headache (p = 0.004). Aspergillus was the most common organism identified in both groups with a slight predominance among GIFRS patients (p = 0.01). GIFRS patients were also more likely to present with no identifiable organisms (p = 0.0006). CIFRS patients were more likely to die of disease (p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: CIFRS generally presents with more symptoms and is associated with poorer outcomes primarily occurring in an immunocompromised population. GIFRS likely follows a more insidious course in immunocompetent patients. Understanding the key differences in symptomatology and outcomes for these two populations is critical for appropriate diagnosis and prognostication.

Biologics versus endoscopic sinus surgery: Acute rhinosinusitis episodes and antibiotic use in chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine if chronic rhinosinusitis patients treated with endoscopic sinus surgery have fewer episodes of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) post treatment compared to CRS patients treated with biologics alone. METHODS: We analyzed the electronic medical records of 213 adults with CRS who initiated treatment with either dupilumab or mepolizumab in calendar years 2016-2021 (CRS-biologics) group and a matched group with tissue eosinophilia who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery (CRS-ESS) group. For each cohort, the medical record was reviewed to determine the number of ARS episodes for 12 months before and after treatment. Similarly, the number of antibiotic prescriptions was determined for each cohort in the 12 months after initiation of biologic therapy or ESS. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in ARS episodes before initiation of between the CRS-biologic and CRS-ESS cohorts (0.38 versus 0.44 episodes per year, respectively; p = 0.323). In contrast, after initiation of therapy, the CRS-biologics group had a significantly reduced frequency of acute rhinosinusitis episodes versus the CRS-ESS group (0.11 versus 0.25 episodes per year; p = 0.001). Finally, the utilization of oral antibiotics in the 12 months after among those treated with biologics versus those treated with ESS was not significantly different (0.04 versus 0.08, respectively; p = 0.109). CONCLUSION: For CRS patients, treatment with dupilumab or mepolizumab significantly reduced the number of ARS episodes compared to CRS treated with ESS. Biologics appear to work as well as ESS in the control of ARS episodes after treatment for CRS.

Preoperative laboratory measurements as a predictor for nasal steroid irrigations after sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

PURPOSE: To assess whether preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), immunoglobulin E (IgE), and blood eosinophil percentage (EOS) can predict need for steroid irrigations after FESS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients at BIDMC from inception until September 8, 2023 with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps who underwent FESS and had preoperative CRP (n = 129), ESR (n = 79), IgE (n = 107), or EOS (n = 125) were included. Labs were divided into normal (CRP: 0-5.0 mg/L; ESR: 0-15 mm/h; IgE: 150-300Ul/mL; EOS: 1-7 %) and high groups (CRP: >5.0 mg/L; ESR: >15 mm/h; IgE: >300Ul/mL; EOS: >7 %). The primary outcome was need for intranasal steroid irrigations after FESS (≤4 weeks, 4-12 weeks, 12-26 weeks, 26-52 weeks, 1-3 years, 3-5 years, and > 5 years). Receiver operating characteristic curves were created to determine thresholds for predicting postoperative steroid irrigations. RESULTS: Elevated IgE required intranasal steroid irrigation at 1-3 years (normal 34 %, high 62 %, p = 0.02), 3-5 years (normal 24 %, high 48 %, p = 0.04), and > 5 years (normal 19 %, high 43 %, p = 0.02). Elevated EOS required intranasal steroid irrigation at 26-52 weeks (normal 7 %, high 25 %, p = 0.009) and > 5 years (normal 19 %, high 46 %, p = 0.005). The area under the curve for IgE at 1-3 years was 0.696 (95 % CI: 0.597-0.795) with cutoff at 144-148 Ul/mL. CRP and ESR were not predictive of postoperative intranasal steroid treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated IgE and EOS (but not CRP or ESR) may predict need for intranasal steroid treatment after FESS.

Preservation or removal of the lateral nasal wall in endoscopic management of maxillary sinus neoplasia: A comparison of approach related morbidity.

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic modified medial maxillectomy (MMM) and prelacrimal approach (PLA) are two routinely performed endoscopic approaches to the maxillary sinus when access via a middle meatal antrostomy is insufficient. However, there is no data in the literature that has compared outcomes and complication profile between the two procedures to determine which approach is superior. OBJECTIVE: To compare the approach related morbidity of PLA and MMM. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all consecutive adult patients undergoing either MMM or PLA from 2009 to 2023 were identified. The primary outcome was development of epistaxis, paraesthesia, lacrimal injury, iatrogenic sinus dysfunction within a minimum of 3 months post-operative follow up. RESULTS: 39 patients (44 sides) underwent PLA and 96 (96 sides) underwent MMM. There were no statistically significant differences between the rates of paraesthesia (9.1 % vs 14.6 %, p = 0.367) or prolonged paraesthesia (2.3 % vs 5.2 %, p = 0.426), iatrogenic maxillary sinus dysfunction (2.3 % vs 5.2 %, p = 0.426) or adhesions requiring removal (4.5 % vs 4.2 %, p = 0.918). No cases of epiphora or nasal cavity stenosis occurred in either arm in our study. CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, the endoscopic modified medial maxillectomy and prelacrimal approach are both equally safe approaches with their own benefits to access.

Maxillary sinus angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia associated to orbital and cutaneous lesion.

INTRODUCTION: We describe the first case of ALHE in the orbit with extension to the maxillary sinus and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to achieve removal of the lesion. CASE STUDY: A 72-year-old man presented with epiphora of the left eye and several episodes of recurrent acute dacryocystitis. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a solid homogeneous mass located in the inferomedial region of the left orbit. In addition, it was associated with destruction of the adjacent ethmoidal wall and upper wall of the left maxillary sinus. Incisional biopsy of the orbital mass was compatible with ALHE. RESULTS: It was decided to perform surgery using an orbital floor approach, left medial wall via subconjunctival and caruncular approach together with an endoscopic nasal approach (ESS), achieving complete removal of the orbital mass and cleaning of the maxillary sinus. After one year of treatment, no tumor recurrence was evident through endoscopy and imaging tests and the patient is asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: ALHE is a very rare benign vascular tumor that presents subcutaneous nodules in the head and neck region. We do not know of any case of ALHE in the paranasal sinuses described in the literature, either in isolation or together with orbital or cutaneous ALHE. In conclusion, ALHE disease should be considered as a diagnosis when faced with an orbital mass with extension to the paranasal sinuses, and a complete excision through a combined endonasal and orbital approach prevents recurrence in most cases.

Pediatric chronic rhinosinusitis.

PURPOSE: An up-to-date overview of diagnosis, differential diagnosis, comorbidities, and current medical and surgical management of pediatric chronic rhinosinusitis (PCRS). METHODS: Review of current evidence-based literature on PCRS. RESULTS: Diagnosis of PCRS seems to be improving based on recent evidence using nasal endoscopy as well as computed tomography scanning. Recent literature supports the fact that chronic adenoiditis can be an independent etiology of symptoms of chronic sinusitis, that are very similar to chronic adenoiditis. Allergic rhinitis and immune deficiency play important roles in the management of PCRS. Surgery for PCRS has evolved significantly in the last 15-20 years to include adenoidectomy as well as endoscopic sinus surgery. CONCLUSIONS: PCRS is very common in children causing poor QOL for these children. Medical management remains the main stay of treatment with attention to management of co-morbidities that may contribute to the disease severity. Making the correct diagnosis will help with the choice of surgical intervention if medical management fails.

The impact of submucosal PRP injection on wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent chronic disease observed on a global scale. The utilization of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has gained significant recognition as an effective intervention for individuals with CRS and nasal polyps who have not responded to conventional treatments. The need (or not) for revision surgery frequently relies on the promotion of optimal wound healing. The impact of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on tissue healing has been extensively examined in various surgical fields. METHODS: The present prospective study involved 30 patients suffering with nasal polyposis who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery. 15 patients were assigned to the PRP group, and 15 patients to the control group. The clinical follow-up of the patients took place at specific intervals, at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12 after the surgical procedure. The evaluator identified the existence of adhesions, crusting, bleeding, granulation and infection using a visual analogue scale score. The patients also completed the SNOT 22 questionnaire prior to surgery and at each postoperative visit. RESULTS: The present study observed a lower incidence of adhesion, infection, hemorrhage and granulation in the PRP group. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference was detected between the groups. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of the present investigation, it seems that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is beneficial on wound healing during the early stages following the surgical procedure. The technique is characterized by its limited invasiveness, which contributes to its low risk profile and the achievement of clinically good outcomes.

A novel technique with butterfly splint for middle turbinate stabilization in sinus surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of newly designed butterfly splint with special technique for middle turbinate stabilization in preventing adhesion following bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled. SETTING: University hospitals. METHODS: Following ESS, in cases of traumatized and/or unstable middle turbinates, newly designed butterfly plastic splint was randomly inserted in the middle meatus of one nasal side, while no splint was inserted in the other (control). Patients were followed up on after 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. Endoscopic examination and a visual analog scale were used to evaluate each side of the nasal cavity for adhesion, crusting, pus, pain, nasal obstruction, and nasal discharge. RESULTS: Thirty patients (60 nasal sides) were included. For all investigated parameters, there was no significant difference between the splinted and non-splinted sides at the first week visit. Adhesion was found significantly less in the splinted sides (3%) than the non-splinted sides (27%) after 1 month (P = 0.038). The adhesion rate in the splinted sides remained 3% at the 3 month follow-up visit, however, in the non-splinted sides, the rate increased up to 30% (P = 0.007). Throughout the follow-up visits, all other investigated parameters remained statistically insignificant between both sides. CONCLUSIONS: The newly designed butterfly plastic splints to avoid middle turbinate adhesion is safe and effective in both reducing middle meatal adhesion with low complication rate in CRSwNP patients undergoing ESS and middle turbinate stabilization in its intermediate position.

Evaluating the efficacy of nasal irrigation in postoperative functional endoscopic sinus surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a mainstay surgical intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Nasal irrigation, particularly with normal saline, is a widely recommended postoperative care modality. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of various nasal irrigation solutions in postoperative FESS patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in multiple databases for randomized controlled trials investigating normal saline and various substances for nasal irrigation post-FESS. The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, and the meta-analysis used R software for data synthesis. Outcome measures included SNOT-22 and LKES scores. The Cochrane tool was employed to evaluate the potential for bias. RESULTS: Results from 14 studies, focusing on six each for SNOT-22 and LKES, revealed a significant reduction in symptoms and endoscopic scores with various solutions compared to normal saline. The meta-analysis using the random-effects model indicated a negative standardized mean difference (SMD) of - 0.69(95% CI [- 1.64; 0.27], p = 0.157) for symptoms and endoscopic scores (SMD = - 0.48, 95% CI [- 1.32; 0.36], z = - 1.12, p = 0.264). Subgroup analyses highlighted budesonide's efficacy over normal saline, but substantial heterogeneity and potential publication bias were noted. CONCLUSION: Nasal irrigation with various solutions postoperative FESS patients demonstrated significant improvements in patient-reported symptoms and endoscopic scores compared to normal saline. Budesonide appeared particularly effective. However, high heterogeneity and potential publication bias warrant cautious interpretation. Standardized outcome measures and further research are needed to strengthen the evidence.

Assessing the safety and tolerability of rhinologic surgery under local anesthetic: an 8-year retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Office-based rhinologic procedures (OBRP) have become widely available in North America due to technological advances and appropriate patient selection. Nevertheless, the literature exploring the safety of these procedures remains limited. The objective of this study was to further evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of these procedures with a more robust sample size to allow for capture of rare events. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent OBRP from May 2015 to March 2023. Information regarding patient demographics, the indication for surgery, wait time, tolerability, intra- and postoperative complications, need for revisions, and type of revision (if applicable) was recorded. RESULTS: 1208 patients underwent OBRP during the study period. No patients were excluded. These included turbinoplasties (35%), endoscopic sinus surgeries (ESS) (26%), septoplasties (15%), nasal fracture reductions (7%), and a variety of other procedures. For ESS procedures, the anterior ethmoids and the maxillary sinuses were the most common sinuses treated. 1.1% of procedures were aborted prior to completion. The post-operative complication rate was 3.2%, with 2 major complications (significant bleeding and sepsis) encountered. The mean follow-up overall was 11 months and for ESS it was 15.8 months. CONCLUSION: Office-based rhinologic procedures are well tolerated and safe for the appropriate patient and associated with shorter wait-times as well as avoidance of general anesthesia. The complication rates are similar to or lower than previously reported rates for rhinologic surgeries done in the operating room. The low rates of revision surgery also demonstrate the efficacy of these procedures.

Plus moist HS-W®: a new nasal packing material for the middle meatus in endoscopic sinus surgery.

PURPOSE: Removal of the current calcium alginate packing materials to the middle meatus in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is usually accompanied by discomfort or pain owing to the hard and brittle nature of these materials. Plus moist HS-W® is a new calcium alginate packing material released in 2022 developed to overcome this issue by changing the uronic acid component. We aimed to compare the discomfort/pain during the removal of Plus moist HS-W® with Kaltostat®, as well as their suitability as packing materials in ESS. METHODS: Kaltostat® and Plus moist HS-W® were used as packing materials in 22 and 21 patients who underwent ESS in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Patients were asked to rate the pain during the packing removal 10 days after ESS using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The ratio of residual packing materials, number of suctions (insertions/extractions of the suction cannula), and time required to remove packing materials were measured. Postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, local infection, lateralization of the middle turbinate, and synechia of the middle meatus were also evaluated. RESULTS: The Plus moist HS-W® group exhibited significantly lower NRS pain scores, a lower ratio of residual packing materials, a reduced number of suctions, and a shorter time required to remove the packing. No obvious postoperative complications occurred in both groups except for one suspicious case of a slight infection in the Kaltostat® group. CONCLUSION: Compared with Kaltostat®, Plus moist HS-W®, characterized by better gelatinization than Kaltostat®, benefits patients by minimizing discomfort/pain during removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

"Boot-on-Donut" procedure for anterior and large septal perforation.

BACKGROUND: Surgical closure of large nasoseptal perforation (NSP) is challenging. The use of an extended anterior ethmoidal artery (eAEA) flap to reconstruct NSP may present with difficulties for NSPs which have their upper edge in a high position. METHOD: We propose adding a "donut-shape" flap from surrounding septal tissue to the eAEA flap. Thus, the inverted edges of this flap allow to cover the uppermost aspect of the NSP. A series of 18 patients with complete closure of NSPs was included. CONCLUSION: This novel "Boot-on-Donut" technique consisting of the eAEA flap (Boot) and inverted edges (Donut) is a feasible procedure that allows to reconstruct large NSP located superiorly.

Efficacy of perioperative lidocaine infusion on surgical field quality during functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus placebo in improving the quality of surgical field during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL were thoroughly searched from inception until June 2023. The included RCTs were evaluated via RoB-2 tool. Our primary endpoint included intraoperative surgical field quality, and secondary endpoints involved operative duration, estimated blood loss, time for post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge, postoperative pain, mean difference in heart rate (HR), and mean difference in mean arterial pressure (MAP). Continuous data were pooled as mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) via RevMan software. Also, the certainty of evidence for each outcome were assessed according to the GRADE system. RESULTS: Four RCTs with total of 267 patients were included. Regarding the intraoperative quality of surgical field, the results indicated a significant difference in favor of the lidocaine group compared to the placebo group (n = 3 RCTs, MD - 0.80, 95% CI [- 0.98, - 0.61], p < 0.001, moderate certainty of evidence). The trial sequential analysis showed there is a substantial and conclusive evidence. Regarding time for PACU discharge, there was a significant difference that favor lidocaine group (p < 0.05). On the contrary, there was no significant difference between lidocaine and placebo groups in terms of operative duration, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain, mean change in MAP and HR, (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our review revealed that lidocaine infusion, compared with a placebo, significantly improved the surgical field and shortened the time required for PACU discharge. However, lidocaine did not reduce surgery time, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain, MAP, or HR.

Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Paranasal Mucocele with Visual Disturbance.

INTRODUCTION: Ocular imaging strategies have evolved to facilitate the diagnosis of optic neuropathy. This study aimed to evaluate the pathogenesis of visual disturbance associated with paranasal mucocele via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A total of 19 patients with mucocele and visual disturbance who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery, orbital MRI, and sinus computed tomography were included. The age, sex, days from onset to surgery, eye pain, and imaging findings were analyzed. The results were compared between two groups: 7 patients with preoperative visual acuity worse than 20/200 (the poor group) and 12 patients with equal or better than 20/200 (the fair group). RESULTS: Imaging showed a high compression rate of the orbit in 17 (89.5%) and enlargement of the subarachnoid space around the optic nerve in 15 (78.9%) of 19 patients. Preoperative vision was significantly poor in cases with hyperintense regions in the optic nerve on T2-weighted imaging, indicating the presence of optic neuritis. No cases showed severe inflammation of the cyst or the presence of intraorbital fat tissue. CONCLUSION: MRI-based diagnosis proved useful in evaluating pathological factors, such as orbital compression, ischemia, and optic neuritis, in individual cases. It can help in gaining insight into the pathogenesis and developing appropriate treatment strategies for visual disturbances associated with paranasal mucocele.