Wound Complications Are Affected by Different Skin Closure Methods in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus on optimal skin closure and dressing strategies to reduce early wound complication rates after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: All 13,271 patients at low risk for wound complications undergoing primary, unilateral THA (7,816), and TKA (5,455) for idiopathic osteoarthritis at our institution between August 2016 and July 2021 were identified. Skin closure, dressing type, and postoperative events related to wound complications were recorded during the first 30 postoperative days. RESULTS: The need for unscheduled office visits to address wound complications was more frequent after TKA than THA (2.74 versus 1.78%, P < .001), and after direct anterior versus posterior approach THA (2.94 versus 1.39%, P < .001). Patients who developed a wound complication, had a mean of 2.9 additional office visits. Compared to the use of topical adhesives, skin closure with staples had the highest risk of wound complications (odds ratio 1.8 [1.07-3.11], P = .028). Topical adhesives with polyester mesh had higher rates of allergic contact dermatitis than topical adhesives without mesh (1.4 versus 0.5%, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Wound complications after primary THA and TKA were often self-limited but increased burden on the patient, surgeon, and care team. These data, which suggest different rates of certain complications with different skin closure strategies, can inform a surgeon on optimal closure methods in their practice. Adoption of the skin closure technique with the lowest risk of complications in our hospital would conservatively result in a reduction of 95 unscheduled office visits and save a projected $585,678 annually.

Comparison between micro-anchor skin dressing and liquid bonding agent for elective knee arthroscopy portal closure.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to evaluate outcomes of elective knee arthroscopy portal closure comparing two skin closure techniques. METHOD: This was a randomised controlled trial including healthy volunteers aged ≥18 years undergoing elective knee arthroscopy that used two portals. At the time of surgery, each patient's two arthroscopy portal closures were randomised to one of two closure techniques; the first technique used approximation of the skin with a micro-anchor skin dressing (BandGrip Inc., US), while the second closure technique used an absorbable suture (Biosyn Monofilament, Medtronic) and a liquid bonding agent skin closure (Dermabond, Ethicon Inc., US). Postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at the first visit after knee arthroscopy and at six weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients (76 portals) were enrolled in this study. No patients reported wound complications of either portal; thus, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in wound complication rates between the skin closure techniques. Survey questions regarding any difference in appearance and cosmesis between the closure techniques' portal sites were responded to by 15 patients, all of whom indicated no difference in appearance between the portal sites. There was also no statistically significant difference between the two closure techniques with regards to appearance. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in presence of wound complications or appearance between skin closure with the micro-anchor skin dressing and the absorbable suture/liquid bonding agent skin closure.

To stitch or not to stitch: the skin closure of laparoscopic port sites, a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses examining skin closure methods for all surgical wounds have found suture to have significantly decreased rates of wound dehiscence compared to tissue adhesive; however, this was not specific to laparoscopic wounds alone. This study aims to determine the best method of skin closure in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominopelvic surgery in order to minimize wound complications and pain, while maximize cosmesis, time and cost efficiency. METHODS: A comprehensive search of EMBASE, Medline, Pubmed, and CENTRAL was conducted from inception to 1st May 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to describe the quality of evidence. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. A summary relative risk (RR) was calculated for dichotomous outcomes where data could be pooled. (Prospero registration number: CRD42019122639). RESULTS: The literature search identified 11,628 potentially eligible studies. Twelve RCTs met inclusion criteria. There was no difference in wound complications (infection, dehiscence, and drainage) between sutures, tissue adhesives nor adhesive papertape. Low-quality evidence found transcutaneous suture had lower rates of wound complications compared with subcuticular sutures (RR 0.22, 95%: CI 0.05-0.98). There was no evidence of a difference in patient-evaluated cosmesis, prolonged pain, or patient satisfaction between the three groups. Closure with tissue adhesive and adhesive papertape was faster and cheaper than suture. CONCLUSION: Tissue adhesive and adhesive papertape offer safe, cost and time-saving alternatives to closure of laparoscopic port sites compared to suture.

Sutures versus clips for skin closure following caesarean section: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate comparative outcomes of skin closure with clips and sutures after caesarean section (CS). METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of electronic information sources and bibliographic reference lists. Wound infection, wound separation, haematoma, seroma, re-admission, closure time, length of hospital stay, patient scar assessment scale (PSAS) and the observer scar assessment scale (OSAS) were the evaluated outcome parameters. RESULTS: We identified 16 randomised controlled trials reporting a total of 4926 patients who had skin closure with sutures (n = 2724) or clips (n = 2202) following CS. Use of clips was associated with a significantly higher rate of wound separation (risk ratio (RR): 2.33, P = 0.004) and longer length of hospital stay (mean difference (MD): 1.21, P = 0.03) but shorter closure time (MD: 5.35, P = 0.00001) when compared to sutures group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the risk of wound infection (RR: 1.12, P = 0.75), haematoma formation (RR: 2.46, P = 0.23), seroma (RR: 1.17, P = 0.73), re-admission rate (RR: 1.28, P = 0.73), PSAS (MD: 0.44, P = 0.73) and OSAS (MD: 0.32, P = 0.55). Trial sequential analysis showed the meta-analysis was conclusive for wound infection, wound separation and closure time; however, it was inconclusive for length of hospital stay, PSAS and OSAS due to risk of type 2 error. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis of best available evidence (level 1) demonstrated that although skin closure with subcuticular sutures is more time-consuming than clips, it is associated with a significantly lower risk of wound separation and shorter length of hospital stay.

Primary versus delayed primary skin closure in operated patients due to perforated peptic ulcer disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a life-threatening complication of peptic ulcer disease. This condition is characterized by a dirty abdomen that predisposes to postoperative wound infection. Delayed primary skin closure is occasionally preferred over primary closure to reduce the risk of surgical site infection in dirty abdominal wounds. In primary skin closure, the skin is sutured immediately after surgery. Meanwhile, in delayed primary skin closure, the incision is left open, and sutured after 2-5 days. The current research aimed to compare the risk for surgical site infection, length of hospitalization, and mortality rate between primary versus delayed primary skin closure among patients who underwent surgery for PPU. METHODS: This single-blind randomized clinical trial included 120 patients who were randomly allocated into the primary and delayed primary closure groups. A research assistant who was blinded to the study examined the wounds for surgical site infection based on the 1992 Center for Disease Control criteria. The outcomes were mortality rate and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: The delayed primary and primary closure groups did not significantly differ in terms of postsurgical wound infection occurring on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 30th days after surgery, mortality rate, and duration of hospitalization. CONCLUSION: In patients who underwent surgery for PPU, delayed primary closure is not recommended over primary closure due to the risk of postoperative surgical site infection.

Suture Materials, Needles, and Methods of Skin Closure: What Every Hand Surgeon Should Know.

Sutures are used ubiquitously in surgery and are the most implanted materials in hand surgery. However, surgical training does not routinely include formal education on stitching materials or needles. Rather, suture familiarity is passed down by common use throughout training. We focus on a brief history and evolution of suture materials and suture needles, their material and mechanical properties, hand surgery-specific applications, other methods of skin closure (staples, skin glue, and adhesive strips), a cost analysis, and advances in musculoskeletal suturing, with a look toward the future. Equipped with a fundamental knowledge of suture needles and suture materials, hand surgeons will be better prepared to select the most appropriate, situation-specific tools.

Temporary skin closure in extremity soft tissue sarcoma - our indications.

INTRODUCTION: Artificial skin replacements were developed to cover defects in general surgery or after burns. Their main indication in oncologic surgery is secondary resection of appropriate margins in skin tumors after incomplete primary excision. This is contraindicated in sarcomas where only wide excision is indicated. The aim of the study is to show rare possible indications for temporary skin closure (TSC) in extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 594 patients with extremity STS treated surgically at the Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital Bulovka, Prague, since 2014, we evaluated those with TSC concerning their indications. RESULTS: TSC (Aquagel twice, Parasorb four times, and COM 30 five times) was used in 11 patients. Six cases were on the foot, three on the femur and two on the lower legs. Seven cases were high-grade sarcomas, two cases were synovial sarcomas, one case was low-grade myxofibrosarcoma and one case was low-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. We covered tendons five times, bones four times and vessels once. Ten of the 11 cases were recurrent tumors with extensive reconstructions, an increased risk of infection or unclear final histology. Two-stage surgeries seem good indications to decrease the adverse effects of prolonged surgery on flap perfusion or patients status. DISCUSSION: Not only the anesthesiologic, but also oncologic factors, potentiating the adverse effects of prolonged surgery on the patient and flaps, are discussed. The pros and cons of individual indications and their alternatives are compared. CONCLUSION: The indications for TSC in extremity STS are rare, but exist. TSC can be a good solution, enabling a safe two-stage reconstruction at a specialized plastic surgery unit, after an initial wide excision at a department of oncologic surgery. This can be a safer method concerning the perfusion of flaps and general status of an oncologic patient.

Ten years of clinical experience with cyanoacrylate glue for venous access in a 1300-bed university hospital.

In the past decade, cyanoacrylate glue has been progressively introduced into the clinical practice of venous access devices used for different purposes. Glue has been used to increase device stabilisation (to reduce the risk of catheter dislodgement), to seal the exit site (to both reduce local bleeding and decrease the risk of bacterial contamination) and to close skin incisions required for the insertion of tunnelled catheters or totally implanted venous ports. For many of these purposes, the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of cyanoacrylate glue has been demonstrated, while some indications are still controversial. This article reports on 10 years of clinical experience with cyanoacrylate glue in a large university hospital, and provides a narrative review of the scientific evidence on the benefits of glue in venous access that has been accumulating over the past decade.

Koyanagi urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias: A stage procedure?

OBJECTIVE: To report experience and technical refinements with the Koyanagi urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between 2004 and 2017. Medical records of patients treated by the Koyanagi technique were investigated. The penile ventral skin was closed either with a Byars flap or using an "Ombredanne's chasuble" (OC). The cohort was divided chronologically into two groups of the same number of patients (early -E- and late experience group-LEG-). Demographics, anatomical findings and surgical outcomes were compared between groups using univariate analysis. A logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with the occurrence of a postoperative urethrocutaneous fistula or urethroplasty dehiscence (UD). RESULTS: The Koyanagi urethroplasty was performed in 67 patients, 33 in the EEG and 34 in the LEG. The overall surgical complication rate was 64.2% (n=43), including 42 fistula or UD, higher in the EEG (81.8%) than in the LEG (44.1%, P<0.01). However, in the LEG, patients underwent the surgery older and the use of OC more frequent. After multivariate analyses, factors associated with a postoperative fistula or UD were the year of surgery (OR=0.71 [0.53-0.96] P=0.02), the age at surgery (OR=1.11 [1.01-1.22], P=0.03); contrary to the skin coverage method or the stenting duration (P>0.05). An urethral stenosis occurred in 1 patient (1.5%). At last follow-up, 64.2% of patients required a further procedure and 80.6% of urethral meatus were glandular. CONCLUSION: In this study the complication rate, particularly the urethrocutaneous fistula, remained high. Urethral stenosis, were rare but the follow-up was too short to clearly identified them. Considering as a 2 stage procedure koyanagi uretroplasty allows to obtain finally good results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Successful surgical closure of infected abdominal wounds following preconditioning with negative pressure wound therapy.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, previous wound infection was considered a contraindication to secondary skin closure; however, several case reports describe successful secondary wound closure of wounds "preconditioned" with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Although this has been increasingly applied in daily practice, a systematic analysis of its feasibility has not been published thus far. The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary skin closure in previously infected abdominal wounds following treatment with NPWT. METHODS: Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with infected abdominal wounds treated with NPWT followed by either secondary skin closure referenced to a group receiving open wound therapy. Endpoints were wound closure rate, wound complications (such as recurrent infection or hernia), and perioperative data (such as duration of NPWT or hospitalization parameters). RESULTS: One hundred ninety-eight patients during 2013-2016 received a secondary skin closure after NPWT and were analyzed and referenced to 67 patients in the same period with open wound treatment after NPWT. No significant difference in BMI, chronic immunosuppressive medication, or tobacco use was found between both groups. The mean duration of hospital stay was 30 days with a comparable duration in both patient groups (29 versus 33 days, p = 0.35). Interestingly, only 7.7% of patients after secondary skin closure developed recurrent surgical site infection and in over 80% of patients were discharged with closed wounds requiring only minimal outpatient wound care. CONCLUSION: Surgical skin closure following NPWT of infected abdominal wounds is a good and safe alternative to open wound treatment. It prevents lengthy outpatient wound therapy and is expected to result in a higher quality of life for patients and reduce health care costs.

Evaluation of three methods of suture for skin closure in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: There are several studies comparing techniques and different materials, yet the results are not unanimous. We compared three methods of skin closure in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including suture with single stitches and unabsorbable MonoNylon®, as well as continuous subcuticular suture with Monocryl® or barbed Stratafix® absorbable suture. METHODS: A prospective, randomized study was conducted with 63 patients undergoing TKA between March 2016 and December 2016. Patients were divided into three groups: traditional suture MonoNylon® (n 22), subcuticular continuous suture with Monocryl® (n 20), and another barbed with Stratafix® (n 21). The closure time, length of wire used, pain intensity, possible complications, and cosmeses were evaluated. RESULTS: Subcuticular continuous suture using Monocryl® was superior to traditional suture using MonoNylon® as less thread was used (p 0.01) and a better cosmetic effect was achieved (p < 0.01), which was equal to Stratafix® aspects analyzed (p > 0.05). Complications were observed mostly in patients who used Stratafix®. CONCLUSIONS: This study concluded that the subcuticular suture with absorbable monofilament Monocryl® proved to be advantageous compared to the others because it presented results equal to the barbed Stratafix®, however with fewer complications. Furthermore, Monocryl® was shown to be equal or superior to traditional MonoNylon® suture regarding in relation pain intensity, aesthetic result, and effective cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: WHO ICTRP identifier RBR78dh5d. Retrospectively registered: 07/29/2020.

Time to closure of orthopaedic surgical incisions: a novel skin closure device versus conventional sutures.

OBJECTIVE: New technologies are being developed to optimise healing of surgical incisions. BandGrip (US) is a micro-anchor skin closure device that replaces the need for subcuticular suturing and further dressing. The purpose of this study is to perform a matched cohort analysis comparing time to closure of surgical incisions between sutures and the novel skin closure device. METHOD: Patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery in 2019 underwent skin closure with either conventional sutures or the novel skin closure device. Patients were divided into three groups according to their procedural incisions: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); simple arthroscopy; and general incisions. Patients who underwent closure of their surgical incision with the novel skin closure device were matched with patients undergoing superficial closure with sutures. Statistical analysis was performed to compare time to closure per centimetre of skin incision between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were included in the study. Overall mean time to closure using the novel skin closure device was less than with sutures (8.6 seconds/cm versus 42.8 seconds/cm, respectively, p<0.001). Mean time to closure for ACLR incisions was 3.7 seconds/cm using the novel skin closure device and 35.5 seconds/cm using sutures (p<0.001). Mean time to closure for simple arthroscopy portals was 19 seconds/cm using the novel skin closure device and 47.6 seconds/cm using sutures (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: BandGrip is a novel skin closure device that allows for efficient surgical incision closure. Time to surgical skin incision closure is significantly less with the use of the novel skin closure device when compared with conventional sutures.

Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems after Radical Vulvectomy for Advanced Vulvar Cancer.

A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in improving vulvectomy healing. Women who underwent radical vulvectomy with complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy for advanced vulvar cancer were divided into two groups according to immediate postoperative care: patients treated with negative pressure wound therapy using the device applied on the site of the wound (including vulva and inguinal region), and patients receiving conventional care. 18 patients were included in the study. 7 (38.9%) women were treated with negative pressure wound therapy immediately after the surgery and were included in the intervention group, and 11 (61.1%) patients were included in the control group. Women who received negative pressure wound therapy had significantly lower length of stay in the hospital (14.2 ± 4.7 versus 17.1 ± 6.1 days, mean difference -6.90 days, 95% confidence interval -11.91 to -1.89), and significantly lower length for wound healing (-31.90 days, 95% confidence interval -43.48 to -20.32). In conclusion, the utilization of the negative wound pressure therapy may contribute to reduce hospitalization after radical vulvectomy for vulvar cancer. Large and well-designed randomized trials with cost effectiveness analyses are needed to confirm these findings.

Evidence-based adoption of purse-string skin closure for stoma wounds.

BACKGROUND: Opinion is divided on the optimal technique of skin closure after stoma reversal as most conventional techniques compromise either on speed/neatness of wound apposition or on the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI). Evidence suggests that purse-string skin closure (PSSC) may achieve both objectives. This study aims to compare conventional primary closure (PC) with PSSC to determine the efficacious technique for stoma wound closure. METHODS: Patients undergoing stoma reversal between April 2015 and September 2017 were prospectively studied. Patients were divided into two groups based on the technique of skin closure (PC or PSSC). The following parameters were assessed: SSI, hospital stay, additional outpatient visit, wound healing time and patient satisfaction based on a standardised questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty one patients underwent stoma reversal (20 PSSC vs 21 PC). Wound infection, need for wound care, length of hospital stay, healing time and scar size were significantly less, whereas average patient wound satisfaction scores were significantly more in the PSSC group. CONCLUSION: Purse-string skin closure (PSSC) proves efficacious and hence merits adoption as the technique of choice for closure of stoma wounds.

Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of efficiency, safety, patient, and surgeon satisfaction between absorbable subcuticular staples and subcuticular suture for caesarean section skin closure. DESIGN: A prospective, randomised, non-blinded, parallel-group trial. SETTING: Mayo Clinic Family Birth Center in Rochester, MN, USA. POPULATION: At least 18 years old and 24 weeks' gestation, undergoing caesarean section. Exclusion criteria were body mass index >50, chorioamnionitis, intrauterine fetal death, and multifetal gestation. METHODS: Patients were stratified by prior caesarean section, body mass index, and surgeon level and randomised to absorbable subcuticular staples or subcuticular suture. Electronic medical records and surveys were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were total operating time, from incision start to close. Secondary outcomes included subcuticular skin closure time, patient and surgeon satisfaction, percutaneous injuries, pain (analgesic use), cosmesis, and wound complications. RESULTS: Of 220 randomised patients, 206 were included in the final analysis (103 per group). Baseline characteristics were similar. The primary outcome of total operative time was not significantly different between groups [54.0 (44.9-63.6) versus 58.0 (50.4-68.2) minutes, P = 0.053]. The subcuticular staple group had shorter subcuticular skin closure time [median 2.6 (1.8-4.0) versus 8.5 (6.2-10.5) minutes, P < 0.001]. There were no differences in analgesic use, wound complications, cosmesis or patient satisfaction. One needlestick injury occurred with suture. Surgeons were more likely to recommend (97% versus 85%, P = 0.004) and use (98% versus 82%, P < 0.001) absorbable subcuticular staples. CONCLUSION: For caesarean section skin closure, absorbable subcuticular staples did not result in significantly different total operative times compared with sutures. Analgesic use, wound complications, and cosmesis were comparable. Patient and surgeon satisfaction were high with both methods. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Absorbable subcuticular staples associated with a similar total operative time compared with suture.

Prospective international multicenter observational study of Novosyn® Quick for skin closures in adults and children (SKINNOQ).

BACKGROUND: This clinical trial evaluated the performance of a newly released fast-absorbable braided synthetic suture (Novosyn® Quick) in adults and paediatric patients undergoing elective skin closures. METHODS: This was a prospective international multicentre observational study. Two centres enrolled 100 patients, of which 50 were adults (visceral surgery, France) and 50 were paediatric patients (paediatric surgery, Germany). Surgeons used a 5-point Likert scale to assess handling characteristics of the suture. Patients and professionals used the Patient-Observer-Scar-Assessment-Scale (POSAS) to rate scar quality. Adverse events were monitored until 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Handling characteristics of Novosyn® Quick were in median rated very good by both general surgeons and paediatric surgeons. Patient components of POSAS (six questions; ten-level Likert scale; best possible score six) scored in median (range) 8.5 (6-28) in the paediatric group versus 12 (6-38) in the adult group, P = 0.01. Patients` overall opinions of POSAS were similar in both groups [mean (SD), 1.86 (0.99) in the paediatric group versus 2.08 (1.35) in the adult group, P = 0.3536]. Observer component of POSAS (six parameters; ten-level numeric rating scale, best possible score six) scored comparably in both groups [median (range), 8 (6-29) in the paediatric group versus 10 (6-28) in the adult group, P = 0.1403]. Observers overall opinion of POSAS favoured the paediatric patients group [mean (SD), 1.48 (0.61) versus 1.92 (1.06) in the adult group, P = 0.0131]. Adverse events in relation to wound healing were not observed in both patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate, that Novosyn® Quick is safe and reliable for skin closure in adults and paediatric patients and can be regarded as a viable alternative to Vicryl® Rapide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered prospectively with ClinicalTrials.gov under the registration number NCT02680886 on 5 February 2016. The trial was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of both study locations (France: CCTIRS N° 16-103 and CNIL:MMS/CWR/AR163920; Germany: 398/15).

Purse-string vs. linear skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is no level 1a evidence regarding the best technique for skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether purse-string skin closure (PSC) is associated with lower surgical site infection (SSI) rates as compared to linear skin closure (LC). METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases were systematically searched. PSC was defined as a circumferential subcuticular suture leaving a small circular skin defect allowing for free drainage, granulation, and epithelialization. In LC, the wound edges were approximated side to side with or without drainage. The primary endpoint was SSI rate. Secondary endpoints included operating time, length of hospital stay, wound healing time, and incisional hernia rates. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criterion was any observational or experimental study comparing PSC to LC in patients undergoing ostomy reversal. RESULTS: Twenty studies (6 experimental and 14 observational) totaling 1812 patients (826 PSC and 986 LC) were included. SSI rates were significantly lower statistically and clinically in patients with PSC [OR (95% CI) = 0.14 (0.09, 0.21); p < 0.0001; NNT = 6] in the meta-analysis of all studies. The subgroup analysis of randomized trials [OR (95% CI) = 0.10 (0.04, 0.21); p < 0.0001; NNT = 6] as well as the analysis of randomized trials including patients with loop ileostomy only [OR (95% CI) = 0.12 (0.05, 0.28); p < 0.0001; NNT = 5] confirmed this finding. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found that PSC was associated with significantly decreased rates of SSI in patients undergoing loop ileostomy reversal.

Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare stainless steel staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure for cesarean delivery in class III obese women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 teaching hospitals from 2015 through 2016 in which women with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and infection occurring up to 6 weeks following delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and patient pain and satisfaction scores. RESULTS: A total of 242 women were enrolled. In all, 119 in the staples group and 119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (P = .74) with an overall wound complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the frequencies of infection, or in superficial or deep wound separation between the 2 study groups. In a univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a significant predictor of wound complications (relative risk, 4.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-18.03; P = .02). Fewer women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (P = .01), however, self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those who had subcuticular suture skin closure.

Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure techniques in stoma closure: a comprehensive meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised trials.

OBJECTIVES: To compare purse-string skin closure (PSC) and linear skin closure (LSC) techniques in patients undergoing stoma closure METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes according to PRISMA statement standards to compare PSC and LSC techniques in stoma closure. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to assess the possibility of type I or II error and compute the information size required for conclusive meta-analysis. RESULTS: We identified six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and eight observational studies, enrolling a total of 1102 patients. The included populations in the PSC and LSC groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. The risk of surgical site infection (SSI) was significantly lower in the PSC group (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.06, 0.18; P < 0.00001). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of operative time (MD 1.80; 95% CI - 1.35, 4.96; P = 0.26), anastomotic leak (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.21, 2.48; P = 0.61), incisional hernia (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.25, 1.37; P = 0.22), small bowel obstruction (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.50, 1.86; P = 0.91), and length of hospital stay (MD - 0.04; 95% CI - 0.51, 0.42; P = 0.86). Patient satisfaction was higher in the PSC group. TSA showed that the risk of type 1 error was minimal and meta-analysis was conclusive. CONCLUSIONS: PSC is associated with significantly lower risk of SSI and better patient satisfaction compared with LSC in closure of stomas and should be the closure technique of choice. The current available evidence is robust and conclusive highlighting that the results of the current study should be incorporated into clinical practice without a need for further trial data.

Purse-string closure technique reduces the incidence of incisional hernias following the reversal of temporary ileostomy.

PURPOSE: The incidence of incisional hernia (IH) at ileostomy closure site has not been sufficiently evaluated. Temporary loop ileostomy is routinely used in patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The goal of this study was to compare the IH rates of standard suture skin closure and purse-string skin closure techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing ileostomy reversal and follow-up CT scan at the University Hospital Frankfurt between January 2009 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed regarding IH and associated risk factors. Patients received either direct stitch skin closure (group DC) or purse-string skin closure (group PS). RESULTS: In total, 111 patients underwent ileostomy reversal in the aforementioned period. In 88 patients, a CT scan was performed 12-24 months after ileostomy reversal for cancer follow-up. Median follow-up was 12 months. Median time interval between ileostoma formation and closure was 12 (± 4 SD) weeks. In 19 of 88 patients (21.5%), an IH was detected. The incidence of IH detected by CT scan was significantly lower in the PS group (n = 7, 12.9%) compared to the DC group (n = 12, 35.2%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study shows an advantage of the purse-string skin closure technique in ileostomy reversals. The use of this technique for skin closure following ileostomy reversals is recommended to reduce the IH rates. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.