Simultaneous sludge minimization and membrane fouling mitigation in membrane bioreactors by using a microaerobic - Settling pretreatment module.

Membrane fouling is the major obstacle for membrane bioreactors operated at a long sludge retention time to reduce sludge production. In this study, a sludge process reduction (SPR) module, consisting of a microaerobic tank and a settler, was inserted before an anoxic/oxic MBR (AO-MBR) to achieve dual objectives of fouling alleviation and sludge reduction. Three SPR-MBRs were operated to investigate influences of sludge recirculation ratios from the SPR settler to the microaerobic tank on process performance. Compared to AO-MBR, the SPR-MBRs reduced sludge production by 43.1-56.4% by maintaining sludge retention times above 175 d, and decreased foulant layer resistance and pore clogging resistance. Inserting SPR reduced the accumulation of dissolved organic matters and extracellular polymeric substances, enlarged sludge flocs, and decreased sludge viscoelasticity. However, increasing RSPR stimulated outward diffusion of extracellular polymeric substances and increased sludge viscosity. SPR-MBRs achieved effective sludge reduction by enriching hydrolytic (Trichococcus and Aeromonas) and fermentative genera (Lactococcus, Paludibacter, Macellibacteroides, and Acinetobacter) in the SPR, and alleviated membrane fouling by prohibiting the growth of extracellular polymeric substance-secreting bacteria and enriching filamentous bacteria to enlarge particle size. The results revealed that the SPR-MBR maximized sludge reduction with a very long sludge retention time, and alleviated membrane fouling synchronously.

Carbon footprint analysis of wastewater treatment processes coupled with sludge in situ reduction.

The goal of this study was to assess the impacts or benefits of sludge in situ reduction (SIR) within wastewater treatment processes with relation to global warming potential in wastewater treatment plants, with a comprehensive consideration of wastewater and sludge treatment. The anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) and the sludge process reduction activated sludge (SPRAS), two typical SIR technologies, were used to compare the carbon footprint analysis results with the conventional anaerobic - anoxic - oxic (AAO) process. Compared to the AAO, the ASSR with a typical sludge reduction efficiency (SRE) of 30 % increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 1.1 - 1.7 %, while the SPRAS with a SRE of 74 % reduced GHG emissions by 12.3 - 17.6 %. Electricity consumption (0.025 - 0.027 kg CO2-eq/m3), CO2 emissions (0.016 - 0.059 kg CO2-eq/m3), and N2O emissions (0.009 - 0.023 kg CO2-eq/m3) for the removal of secondary substrates released from sludge decay in the SIR processes were the major contributor to the increased GHG emissions from the wastewater treatment system. By lowering sludge production and the organic matter content in the sludge, the SIR processes significantly decreased the carbon footprints associated with sludge treatment and disposal. The threshold SREs of the ASSR for GHG reduction were 27.7 % and 34.6 % for the advanced dewatering - sanitary landfill and conventional dewatering - drying-incinerating routes, respectively. Overall, the SPRAS process could be considered as a cost-effective and sustainable low-carbon SIR technology for wastewater treatment.

Unraveling roles of the intermediate settler in a microaerobic hydrolysis sludge in situ reduction process.

The roles of the intermediate settler in the sludge process reduction activated sludge process (SPRAS), and the influences of its hydraulic retention time (HRTST) on pollutant removal and sludge reduction were investigated. Prolonging HRTST from 3.0 to 4.5 and 6.0 h resulted in sludge reduction efficiencies increased from 46.8% to 61.5% and 62.7%. The sludge accumulation in the intermediate settler formed an anaerobic zone but inhibited methane production, and the alternating microaerobic and anaerobic environment in the sludge process reduction (SPR) module increased the microbial diversity and enriched the hydrolytic and fermentative bacteria. Prolonging HRTST accelerated dissolved organic matter release and elevated the degradation of refractory fraction, and improved the sludge properties of the SPRAS. Metagenomic analysis showed that the SPR module enhanced the glycolysis pathway and decoupling metabolism for sludge reduction. The results revealed that the intermediate settler plays dual roles in solid-liquid separation and sludge reduction metabolism.

Sludge decay kinetics and metagenomic analysis uncover discrepant metabolic mechanisms in two different sludge in situ reduction systems.

A comparative study was conducted between an anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) process and a sludge process reduction (SPR) activated sludge (SPRAS) process for uncovering crucial metabolic mechanisms governing sludge reduction. Both of two processes were efficient in removing pollutants, while the SPRAS (62.3 %) obtained much higher sludge reduction than the ASSR (27.9 %). The highest rate coefficients of sludge decay, heterotroph lysis and particles hydrolysis were 0.106, 0.219 and 0.054 d-1 in the SPR module, followed by ASSR with coefficients of 0.060, 0.135 and 0.047 d-1. The SPR module achieved an 81.9 % higher sludge decay mass with a 32.8 % smaller volume than the ASSR module. The SPR module preferentially enriched hydrolytic/fermentative and slow-growing bacteria. Metagenomic analysis revealed that SPR strengthened the key hydrolases and L-lactate dehydrogenase in the glycolysis pathways and weakened the citrate cycle, inducing metabolic uncoupling due to the reduced biosynthesis of ATP. Inserting ASSR only altered the ATP biosynthesis pathway, but maintenance metabolism was dominant for sludge reduction, with a long sludge retention time prolonging the food chain for predation.