Rapid Mobilization Reveals a Highly Engraftable Hematopoietic Stem Cell.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a potential curative therapy for malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Improving the efficiency of stem cell collection and the quality of the cells acquired can broaden the donor pool and improve patient outcomes. We developed a rapid stem cell mobilization regimen utilizing a unique CXCR2 agonist, GROß, and the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100. A single injection of both agents resulted in stem cell mobilization peaking within 15 min that was equivalent in magnitude to a standard multi-day regimen of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Mechanistic studies determined that rapid mobilization results from synergistic signaling on neutrophils, resulting in enhanced MMP-9 release, and unexpectedly revealed genetic polymorphisms in MMP-9 that alter activity. This mobilization regimen results in preferential trafficking of stem cells that demonstrate a higher engraftment efficiency than those mobilized by G-CSF. Our studies suggest a potential new strategy for the rapid collection of an improved hematopoietic graft.

Effect of voxelotor on murine bone marrow and peripheral blood with hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for gene therapy of sickle cell disease.

In preparation for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection, current ex vivo gene therapy protocols for sickle cell disease require patients to undergo several months of chronic red cell transfusion. For health care equity, alternatives to red cell transfusion should be available. We examined whether treatment with GBT1118, the murine analog of voxelotor, could be a safe and feasible alternative to red cell transfusion. We found that 3 weeks of treatment with GBT1118 increased the percentage of bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells and upon plerixafor mobilization, the percentage of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells. Our data suggest that voxelotor should be further explored for its potential safety and utility as preparation for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection.

Comparison of the efficacy of a generic plerixafor versus Mozobil as adjunct peripheral blood stem cell mobilization agents in multiple myeloma patients.

BACKGROUND: Plerixafor is an adjunct peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization agent with well-demonstrated safety and efficacy. The routine use of the originator brand drug (Mozobil) has been limited by cost. This retrospective study was conducted to compare the mobilization efficacy of a lower-cost generic plerixafor and Mozobil in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included two near-concurrent cohorts of MM patients mobilized with brand (n = 64) or generic (n = 61) plerixafor in addition to filgrastim. Collection and early engraftment outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The two cohorts had comparable distributions of sex, age, and weight. Previous treatment histories and proportions of upfront versus just-in-time plerixafor use were similar. There was no significant difference in their median overall cumulative total yield (106 CD34+ cells/kg) (brand, 5.91; generic, 5.80; p = .51). However, the generic cohort had a significantly higher median yield after the first dose (4.79 vs. 3.78, p = .03), and consequently lower median numbers of plerixafor doses (p = .001) and collection days (p = .002). Only 31.1% of patients in the generic arm required more than one dose versus 59.4% of patients in the brand arm (p = .006). All transplanted patients in the brand and generic arms (90.6% and 85.2% respectively, p = .42) achieved engraftment. There was no significant difference in their median times to platelet and neutrophil engraftment, nor their transfusion requirements during the first 30 days post-transplant. CONCLUSION: The generic plerixafor produced comparable cumulative collection yields and early engraftment outcomes as Mozobil, but fewer doses and collection days were needed to reach collection goal.

Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim and originator filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Nivestym, a biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to the originator filgrastim (Neupogen), is now being used for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We aim to compare the efficacy of Nivestym and Neupogen for PBSC mobilization in healthy allogeneic donors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study including 541 adult allo-HSCT donors receiving Nivestym (January 2013-July 2020), or Neupogen (July 2020-June 2023) for donor PBSC mobilization. Bivariate analysis was conducted using SPSS version 28. Statistical significance was determined at a p-value <.05. RESULTS: Our study included 541 allo-HSCT donors who received Neupogen (n = 345, 64%) or Nivestym (n = 196, 36%) for PBSC mobilization. The median age was 47 years (range 17-76). The median donor weight was 86 kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87-91). Donors receiving Neupogen had similar pre-G-CSF white blood cell count, CD34+ percentages, and circulating CD34+ count compared with donors receiving Nivestym. The Neupogen group had similar median PBSC product total neutrophil count, CD34+ percentage, absolute CD34+ count, and infused CD34+ dose compared with the Nivestym group. For donors aged 35 years or younger, the median CD34+ dose was higher in donors who received Neupogen compared with Nivestym (6.9 vs. 6.3 million cells/kg, p = .044). CONCLUSIONS: Nivestym demonstrated similar efficacy for PBSC mobilization compared with Neupogen among allo-HSCT donors. In donors aged 35 years or younger, a slightly lower PBSC product CD34+ count was noted with Nivestym compared with Neupogen.

Oncostatin M: Dual Regulator of the Skeletal and Hematopoietic Systems.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The bone and hematopoietic tissues coemerge during development and are functionally intertwined throughout mammalian life. Oncostatin M (OSM) is an inflammatory cytokine of the interleukin-6 family produced by osteoblasts, bone marrow macrophages, and neutrophils. OSM acts via two heterodimeric receptors comprising GP130 with either an OSM receptor (OSMR) or a leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR). OSMR is expressed on osteoblasts, mesenchymal, and endothelial cells and mice deficient for the Osm or Osmr genes have both bone and blood phenotypes illustrating the importance of OSM and OSMR in regulating these two intertwined tissues. RECENT FINDINGS: OSM regulates bone mass through signaling via OSMR, adaptor protein SHC1, and transducer STAT3 to both stimulate osteoclast formation and promote osteoblast commitment; the effect on bone formation is also supported by action through LIFR. OSM produced by macrophages is an important inducer of neurogenic heterotopic ossifications in peri-articular muscles following spinal cord injury. OSM produced by neutrophils in the bone marrow induces hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell proliferation in an indirect manner via OSMR expressed by bone marrow stromal and endothelial cells that form hematopoietic stem cell niches. OSM acts as a brake to therapeutic hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in response to G-CSF and CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor. Excessive OSM production by macrophages in the bone marrow is a key contributor to poor hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (mobilopathy) in people with diabetes. OSM and OSMR may also play important roles in the progression of several cancers. It is increasingly clear that OSM plays unique roles in regulating the maintenance and regeneration of bone, hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, inflammation, and skeletal muscles. Dysregulated OSM production can lead to bone pathologies, defective muscle repair and formation of heterotopic ossifications in injured muscles, suboptimal mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells, exacerbated inflammatory responses, and anti-tumoral immunity. Ongoing research will establish whether neutralizing antibodies or cytokine traps may be useful to correct pathologies associated with excessive OSM production.

Shorter donor leukocyte telomere length is associated with poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Insufficient numbers of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization occurs in a significant proportion of PBSC collections, often from older age donors. Telomere length (TL) is often used as an indicator of an individual's biological age. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between donors' leukocyte TL and the outcome of G-CSF-induced PBSC mobilization in healthy unrelated donors. METHODS: Donors' leukocyte TLs and the outcome of G-CSF-induced PBSC mobilization, as assessed by pre-harvest CD34+ cell counts, were analyzed in 39 healthy PBSC donors. TL in a non-mobilized general population (n = 90) was included as a control group. G-CSF mobilization effect was categorized into three groups according to pre-harvest CD34+ cell count: poor (≤25/µL, PMD), intermediate (between 25 and 180/µL), and good (≥180/µl, GMD). RESULTS: Leukocyte TL of PBSC donors correlated well with pre-harvest CD34+ cell counts (r = 0.645, p < 0.001). Leukocyte TLs of PMDs (n = 8) were significantly shorter than those of GMDs (n = 9) and non-mobilization controls (p < 0.05). Moreover, all PMD TLs were below the 50th percentile, and 62.5% of PMDs had TLs below the 10th percentile of age-matched control participants. In contrast, no GMD TLs were below the 10th percentile; in fact, 33.3% (3/9) of them were above the 90th percentile. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that shorter donor leukocyte TL is associated with poor G-CSF-induced PBSC mobilization. TL, which represents a donor's biological age, could be a potential predictor for mobilization outcome.

Day 4 collection of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized HLA-matched sibling donor peripheral blood allografts demonstrates no long-term increase in chronic graft-versus-host disease or relapse rates.

BACKGROUND AIMS: In a previous pilot study of HLA-matched sibling donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the authors determined the feasibility of day 4 versus day 5 granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection compared with a historical cohort. Given identified differences in the PBSC product (day 4 cohort with significantly lower infused total nucleated, mononuclear and CD3 cells compared with other collection cohorts), the authors performed a follow-up study to determine long-term post-HCT outcomes, including detailed characterization of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). METHODS: This was a prospective observational study, and the authors collected data on chronic GVHD, staging, sites of involvement and treatments. Performance status, incidence of relapse, overall survival and duration of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) were also evaluated. Data were examined retrospectively. To account for differences in length of follow-up among cohorts, the authors also determined performance status and chronic GVHD staging, sites and treatment at 2 years post-HCT. RESULTS: At 2 years post-HCT, the overall survival rate was 71.7% in the day 4 cohort compared with 61.5%, 52% and 56% in the day 5, 2-day and historical cohorts, respectively (P = 0.283). The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 65.2% in the day 4 cohort versus 46.4% in the day 5 cohort, 51.1% in the 2-day cohort and 65% in the historical cohort (P = 0.26). There was no significant difference in the maximum overall stage of chronic GVHD (P = 0.513), median number of sites involved (P = 0.401) or cumulative incidence of discontinuation of IST (P = 0.32). Death from chronic GVHD was less common in the day 4 and day 5 cohorts compared with the 2-day and historical cohorts, though this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' preliminary results demonstrated that collection of allogeneic matched sibling donor PBSCs on day 4 of G-CSF was feasible, reduced donor exposure to growth factor and was associated with an initial cost savings. Importantly, the authors now demonstrate that transplantation of day 4 mobilized PBSCs is not associated with any adverse outcomes post-HCT, including late effects such as chronic GVHD. Further investigation of donor G-CSF collection algorithms is merited in other HCT settings, including unrelated and mismatched related donors.

Stem cell collection after lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone plus elotuzumab or isatuximab in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single centre experience from the GMMG-HD6 and -HD7 trials.

BACKGROUND: While quadruplet induction therapies deepen responses in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, their impact on peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection remains incompletely understood. This analysis aims to evaluate the effects of prolonged lenalidomide induction and isatuximab- or elotuzumab-containing quadruplet induction therapies on PBSC mobilization and collection. METHODS: A total of 179 transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed MM treated at a single academic center were included. The patients were evaluated based on PBSC mobilization and collection parameters, including overall collection results, CD34+ cell levels in peripheral blood, leukapheresis (LP) delays, overall number of LP sessions, and the rate of rescue mobilization with plerixafor. The patients underwent four different induction regimens: Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd, six 21-day cycles, n = 44), isatuximab-RVd (six 21-day cycles, n = 35), RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 51), or elotuzumab-RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 49). RESULTS: The patients' characteristics were well balanced across the different groups. Collection failures, defined as the inability to collect three sufficient PBSC transplants, were rare (n = 3, 2%), with no occurrences in the isatuximab-RVd and elotuzumab-RVd groups. Intensified induction with six 21-day cycles of RVd did not negatively impact the overall number of collected PBSCs (9.7 × 106/kg bw versus 10.5 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.331) compared to four 21-day cycles of RVd. Plerixafor usage was more common after six cycles of RVd compared to four cycles (16% versus 8%). Addition of elotuzumab to RVd did not adversely affect overall PBSC collection (10.9 × 106/kg bw versus 10.5 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.915). Patients treated with isatuximab-RVd (six cycles) had lower numbers of collected stem cells compared to those receiving RVd (six cycles) induction (8.8 × 106/kg bw versus 9.7 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.801), without experiencing significant delays in LP or increased numbers of LP sessions in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Plerixafor usage was more common after isatuximab plus RVd compared to RVd alone (34% versus 16%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that stem cell collection is feasible after prolonged induction with isatuximab-RVd without collection failures and might be further explored as induction therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Patients were treated within the randomized phase III clinical trials GMMG-HD6 (NCT02495922, 24/06/2015) and GMMG-HD7 (NCT03617731, 24/07/2018). However, during stem cell mobilization and -collection, no study-specific therapeutic intervention was performed.

A novel PEGylated form of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, mecapegfilgrastim, for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with hematologic malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) has longer half-life and is given once only, which is more comfortable for patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mecapegfilgrastim for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in patients with hematologic malignancies and to explore the potential factors related to HSC mobilization. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent HSC mobilization in the hematology department of Mianyang Central Hospital from April 2016 to November 2022. The number of CD34 + cells collected was compared between the patients receiving mecapegfilgrastim (PEG group) and those receiving recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF group), and the possible factors for mobilization failure were analyzed. RESULTS: The success rates of collecting CD34 + cells in the PEG group and rhG-CSF group were 80.6% and 67.7%, respectively (χ = 1.444, P = 0.229). The median CD34 + cell counts were 3.62 × 10^6/kg and 2.92 × 10^6/kg (P = 0.178), respectively. After combination with plerixafor for mobilization, the median number of CD34 + cells collected in the PEG group and rhG-CSF group were 3.64 × 10^6/kg and 3.92 × 10^6/kg, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.754). There was no significant difference in hematopoietic cell recovery or infection between the groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that more than 5 cycles of chemotherapy (OR = 15.897, 95% CI: 1.766-143.127, P = 0.014), a precollection WBC count < 32 × 10^9/L (OR = 14.441, 95% CI: 2.180-95.657, P = 0.006) and a precollection to premobilization lymphocyte ratio < 1.7 (OR = 11.388, 95% CI: 2.129-60.915, P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for HSC mobilization failure. CONCLUSIONS: The HSC mobilization efficacy of mecapegfilgrastim in patients with hematologic malignancies was comparable to that of rhG-CSF, and combination with plerixafor for mobilization was feasible and effective. Patients with more than 5 cycles of chemotherapy before HSC mobilization, a precollection WBC count lower than 32 × 10^9/L, and a precollection lymphocyte count less than 1.7 times the premobilization lymphocyte count have a high probability of HSC mobilization failure.

Effectiveness of single-dose 6 mg pegfilgrastim in mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation donors.

A single injection of 12 mg pegfilgrastim was used to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) from healthy donors in some studies. The purpose of this study was to determine if 6 mg of pegfilgrastim was effective and safe for mobilizing CD34+ cells in donors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We conducted a retrospective case-matched design. A single dosage of 6 mg pegfilgrastim was used to mobilize PBPCs from 60 healthy donors. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, 10 µg/kg) was administered daily to the matched donors. Leukapheresis was scheduled to commence on day 4 of the mobilization regimen. The median yielded CD34+ cell in the pegfilgrastim group was higher than those in the G-CSF group, at 5.06 × 106/kg recipient weight. The 73.3% of donors mobilized with pegfilgrastim yielded >4 × 106 cells/kg CD34+ cells in a single apheresis procedure when compared to the 33.3% of donors mobilized with G-CSF (P < 0.001). The myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) proportion in the pegfilgrastim group was significantly higher than that in the G-CSF group (P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was higher in the G-CSF group than that in the pegfilgrastim group (26.7% vs. 11.7%), without statistical difference. In comparison to the G-CSF group, the pegfilgrastim group had a reduced median pain intensity numerical rating scale score (1 vs. 2). A single 6 mg dosage of pegfilgrastim is effective and safe for allogeneic PBPCs collection from healthy donors. Pegfilgrastim may decrease the incidence of aGVHD by boosting MDSCs, which need further investigation.

Stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: challenges, strategies, and current developments.

Among hematological malignancies, multiple myeloma (MM) represents the leading indication of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Auto-HCT is predominantly performed with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs), and the mobilization and collection of PBSCs are essential steps for auto-HCT. Despite the improved success of conventional methods with the incorporation of novel agents for PBSC mobilization in MM, mobilization failure is still a concern. The current review comprehensively summarizes various mobilization strategies for mobilizing PBSCs in MM patients and the evolution of these strategies over time. Moreover, existing evidence substantiates that the mobilization regimen used may be an important determinant of graft content. However, limited data are available on the effects of graft characteristics in patient outcomes other than hematopoietic engraftment. In this review, we discussed the effect of graft characteristics on clinical outcomes, mobilization failure, factors predictive of poor mobilization, and potential mobilization regimens for such patients.

Feasibility of peripheral blood stem cell collection from sickle cell trait donors with an intensified G-CSF regimen.

OBJECTIVES: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for SCD and bone marrow from an HLA-matched sibling is currently the standard of care. Haploidentical HSCT from a family donor with a TCR αß/CD19 depleted graft (T-haplo) is an increasingly successful alternative, which requires the generation of G-CSF stimulated peripheral stem cell (PBSC) from haploidentical relatives. These sickle cell trait (SCT) donors reported to develop SCD-related complications in conditions of severe stress. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we compared the safety and efficacy of PBSC mobilization with a G-CSF intensified mobilization regimen in SCT donors with a conventional G-CSF mobilization regimen in healthy donors. RESULTS: The reported adverse events were similar during intensified G-CSF mobilization, apheresis, and shortly after stem cell apheresis in SCT and control donors. In SCT and control donors, we were able to mobilize high yields of CD34+ stem cells and the harvested CD34+ cell count was comparable with control donors. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral stem cell mobilization using an intensified G-CSF regimen is safe, and well tolerated among SCT donors. SCT donors are a valid alternative for collection of peripheral CD34+ stem cells for T-cell-depleted haploidentical stem cell transplantation.

Intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and bortezomib for PBSC mobilization in multiple myeloma.

Although the incorporation of bortezomib into induction regimens has improved response rates in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), the role of bortezomib in the peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization remains unclear. We assessed the PBSC mobilization efficacy, safety, and disease response of intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and bortezomib in the PBSC mobilization. Twenty-one patients with newly diagnosed MM were enrolled in a phase II, non-randomized study that used bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2/day on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) and intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2/day on days 2, 3) (Bor-ID-CY). The data from 15 patients who received intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (ID-CY) were used as a historical control group. The total CD34 + cell yield of Bor-ID-CY and ID-CY groups were not significantly different (median 6.3 ×106/kg vs. 6.5 ×106/kg, p = 0.26). All three patients with mobilization failure of two groups had t(11;14). Six patients in Bor-ID-CY group were upgraded from a status that was less than a very good partial response (VGPR) at the time of PBSC mobilization to a VGPR or better after PBSC mobilization (p = 0.014). Four patients in Bor-ID-CY group developed sepsis. The time to engraftment was similar in the two groups. The addition of bortezomib to ID-CY did not impact the stem cell yield or quality.

Overview on novel strategies and current guidelines for hematopoietic stem cell mobilisation and collection.

The success of the autologous stem cell transplantation is strictly related to an adequate hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection. The minimum threshold for a successful mobilization is currently defined as 2 × 106/kg CD34+ cells. However, the optimal stem cell mobilization strategy is still controversial. The availability of plerixafor, a selective and reversible CXCR4 inhibitor, has been associated with an higher use of chemo-free protocols by many centres. In the near future, it is conceivable that artificial intelligence may became more accurate and comprehensive, possibly guiding clinicians in choosing the optimal mobilisation treatment for the various patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Machine learning-based scoring models may be the basis for the development of "intelligent" mobilisation algorithms.

Pharmacoeconomic issues in stem cell mobilization.

BACKGROUND: recently, stem cell mobilization has made dramatic progress, that ended up in an increasing number of aphereses at target for autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The aim of this research is investigating the cost-effectiveness of stem cell mobilization. METHODS: a narrative review of the literature was carried out, searching for primary contributions written in English and published during 2000-2023 on cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of stem cell mobilization in patients entitled to ASCT. The PubMed database was searched with the following sets of keywords: cost-effectiveness AND apheresis AND myeloma (PubMed_1); cost-effectiveness AND stem cell mobilization (PubMed_2). Articles included in the analysis were assessed via two different checklists. RESULTS: sixty-six entries were retrieved. Five out of 66 (PubMed_1: 4 out 17; PubMed_2: 1 out of 49), 4 CEAs and 1 cost-utility analysis (CUA) fit the research goal. Four out of 5 contributions proved to be in line with most of the items included in the two assessment grids. However, the most relevant missing features in some of the included contributions were: study perspective, healthcare resources valuation, and sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: most of the articles included in this research show that chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization is cost-effective according to different standpoints. Future health economic research on this topic should establish local threshold values for incremental apheresis at target and explore the heterogeneity of CEA (and CUA) to determine oncohaematological diseases and patient categories for which chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization is cost-effective in different healthcare systems, given local budget constraints.

The efficacy of residual plerixafor for second-day stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus plerixafor has been shown to improve the efficacy of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization, however, due to its high price, the use of plerixafor is limited in China. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of residual plerixafor for second-day stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, 69 MM patients received G-CSF + plerixafor to mobilize PBSCs, which were collected from 28 patients only for one day and 41 patients for two days. Some of the patients received residual plerixafor, and PBSCs were collected on the second day. The data on the characteristics, different doses of plerixafor and efficacy of PBSC mobilization were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: After 1 or 2 apheresis procedures, 85.5% of patients collected more than 2 × 106 cells/kg PBSCs. There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of CD34 + PBSC mobilization with the different doses of plerixafor on the first day, but the higher residual plerixafor dose resulted in better success rates on the second day (P＜0.001). Among the patients who collected PBSCs for two days, the level of the CD34 + cell yield of 24 patients (58.5%) changed better, which was significantly correlated with the dose of residual plerixafor on the second day (P = 0.001). DISCUSSION: These results suggested that the administration of residual plerixafor to mobilize stem cells on the second day is an economical, efficient and clinically feasible method.

Role of large unstained cells in predicting successful stem cell collection in autologous stem cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Sufficient stem cell collection is mandatory for Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Peripheral CD34+ stem CD34 + stem cell counting by flow cytometry is the gold standard method in both the predicting and timing of successful stem cell collection. Large unstained cells (LUC) are large peroxidase-negative cells that are displayed on certain automatic cell counters and present large lymphocytes, virocytes, blasts, abnormal cells and hematopoietic stem cells. In this study, we evaluated the role of LUC parameters in the timing and prediction of successful stem cell collection. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma, lymphoma and testis tumor who proceed to ASCT were included in this study. Preapheresis LUC parameters were analyzed with Siemens ADVIA® 2120i system., Kruskal Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Spearman Rho and receiver-operator curve (ROC) tests were used for analyses. RESULTS: Ninety patients were evaluated. Peripheral CD34 + cell count was positively correlated with both LUC count (p = 0014) and LUC percentage (p = 0,01). LUC percentage in peripheral blood was positively correlated with mobilized stem cell count in the yield (p = 0.003). We found a LUC count of > 0.485 × 109/L as a cut-off value for detecting > 20 × 106/L CD34 +cells in the peripheral blood with a sensitivity of 64.6% and specificity of 75%. We defined > 2.15% as a cut-off value for LUC percentage to collect > 5 × 106/kg of stem cells with a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 63%. Additionally, total nucleated cell (TNC) count was negatively correlated with LUC percentage (p = 0.014) and positively correlated with LUC count (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: LUC parameters are readily available, simple and cheap tools that can be useful in both timing of CD34 count by flow cytometry in peripheral blood and in the prediction of successful mobilization. LUCs can also be an indicator of graft composition.

Stem cell mobilizating effect of heparin in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Adequate stem cell collection is essential for successful stem cell transplantation. Heparin enhances stem cell mobilization by competing with heparin sulfate proteoglycans. Heparin is also used as an anticoagulant before leukapheresis. Here, we evaluated the effects of heparin on stem cell mobilization in patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent ASCT. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received heparin plus citrate (heparinized patients) and those who received citrate only (nonheparinized patients) for anticoagulation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also performed. The collection efficiency 2 (CE2) for CD34+ cells was calculated and compared between heparinized and nonheparinized patients. RESULTS: This study included 1017 patients. There were 478 (47%) heparinized and 539 (53%) nonheparinized patients. The number of collected CD34+ cells was significantly higher in heparinized patients (P < .00001). The multivariate analyses showed that using heparin was an independent positive factor for collected CD34+ cells (adj-R2 = 0.744; F = 369.331, P < .00001). CE2 was significantly higher in heparinized patients than in nonheparinized patients (66.8% vs 52.1%; P < .00001). The rate of collecting at least 2 × 106 /kg CD34+ cells was 3.3 times higher for heparinized patients in poor mobilizers (P < .00001). Heparinized patients had significantly higher total nucleated and mononuclear cell counts (P < .00001 and <.00001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Heparin enhances stem cell collection and increases CE2. The use of heparin may reduce the need for other strategies to increase stem cell mobilization.

A nonparametric method for classification trees using grouped covariates.

A group of variables are commonly seen in diagnostic medicine when multiple prognostic factors are aggregated into a composite score to represent the risk profile. A model selection method considers these covariates as all-in or all-out types. Model selection procedures for grouped covariates and their applications have thrived in recent years, in part because of the development of genetic research in which gene-gene or gene-environment interactions and regulatory network pathways are considered groups of individual variables. However, little has been discussed on how to utilize grouped covariates to grow a classification tree. In this paper, we propose a nonparametric method to address the selection of split variables for grouped covariates and their following selection of split points. Comprehensive simulations were implemented to show the superiority of our procedures compared to a commonly used recursive partition algorithm. The practical use of our method is demonstrated through a real data analysis that uses a group of prognostic factors to classify the successful mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells.

Predicting Successful Hematopoietic Stem Cell Collection in Healthy Allogeneic Donors.

Introduction: Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) from healthy donors is a well-established process. We aimed to identify factors predictive of successful CD34+ PBSC collection and established a formula capable of predicting CD34+ cell yield. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 588 healthy adult donors (median age 29 years, range 18-69 years) at our institution from 2017 to 2022. The predicted minimal number of CD34+ cells was calculated as follows: (peripheral CD34+ cells/µL × adjusted collection efficiency of 30%) × total liters processed. This formula was further modified according to donor and recipient body weight (BW). Results: Median total collection was 8.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg BW (range 1.0-47.1 × 106 cells/kg BW) with 522 donors (89%) collecting ≥5.0 × 106 cells/kg of recipient BW. A second leukapheresis (LP) was performed in 49 donors. Need for two LPs was more common in female donors (OR 6.68, 95% CI, 2.62-17.05; p < 0.001), donors with higher age (OR for 10 years difference 1.53, 95% CI, 1.15-2.03, p = 0.003), donors with WBC count <30 × 109/L after 5 days of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulation (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.59-11.83; p = 0.004), and a donor/recipient weight ratio <1 (OR 6.21, 95% CI, 2.69-14.34; p < 0.001). Predictive factors for optimal LP (i.e., ≥5.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg of recipient BW) were peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell count >50/µL (OR 12.82, range 6.34-25.92, p < 0.001), male donor (OR 2.77, range 1.06-7.23, p = 0.04), and a donor/recipient weight ratio >1 (OR 3.12, range 1.57-6.24, p = 0.001). WBC, platelets, hemoglobin, and age had no significant predictive value. Predicted versus observed number of CD34+ cells/kg BW collected demonstrated a very strong linear correlation (r = 0.925, 95% CI, 0.912-0.936, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Of the routinely monitored indicators in PBSC donors, CD34+ cell count in PB is the most important factor in predicting G-CSF-induced PBSC yields. Higher age, female sex, WBC <30 × 109/L, and a donor/recipient weight ratio <1 are useful indicators for identifying suboptimal mobilizers. The modified formula has shown successful and consistent performance in the prediction of key outcome measures including the minimum CD34+ cell collection, determination of the required length of apheresis, and whether a second day of PBSC collection was necessary to achieve the respective collection goal.