RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To explore the clinical effect of laminectomy alone and laminectomy with instrumentation in the treatment of TOLF. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 142 patients with TOLF and laminectomy who underwent spine surgery at XXX Medical University from January 2003 to January 2018. According to whether the laminectomy was combined with instrumentation, the patients were divided into two groups: group A (laminectomy alone (LA), n = 77) and group B (laminectomy with instrumentation (LI), n = 65). Comparisons of possible influencing factors of demographic variables and operation-related variables were carried out between the two groups. In this study, the clinical effects of LA and LI in the treatment of TOLF were discussed. Thus, we explored the clinical effect of LA and LI in the treatment of TOLF. RESULTS: In terms of demographics, there was a statistically significant difference in BMI between group A and group B (P < 0.05). The differences in age, sex, smoking, drinking, heart disease, hypertension and diabetes were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In terms of preoperative symptoms, there was a significant difference in gait disturbance, pain in the LE, and urination disorder between group A and group B (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in other variables between the two groups (P > 0.05). In terms of operation-related variables, there was a significant difference in the preoperative duration of symptoms, intramedullary signal change on MRI, dural ossification, residual rate of cross-sectional spinal canal area on CT, shape on the sagittal MRI, operation time, pre-mJOA, post-mJOA at 1 year, and leakage of cerebrospinal fluid between group A and group B (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in other variables between the two groups (P > 0.05). The preoperative average JOA score of group A was 6.37 and that of group B was 5.19. In group A, the average JOA score at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after surgery was 7.87, 8.23 and 8.26, respectively, and the average JOA score improvement rate was 32.79 %, 38.32 and 38.53 %, respectively. In group B, the average JOA score at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after surgery was 7.74, 8.15 and 8.29, respectively, and the average JOA score improvement rate was 39.15 %, 46.86 and 47.12 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is no consensus on whether instrumentation is needed after laminectomy for TOLF. We found that for patients with a long duration of gait disturbance, urination disorder, preoperative duration of symptoms, intramedullary signal change on MRI, dural ossification, residual rate of cross-sectional spinal canal area on CT less than 60 %, and shape on the sagittal MRI being beak and low, pre-mJOA had better clinical effects after LI as compared to those after LA, and the incidence of perioperative complications was lower.
Asunto(s)
Laminectomía , Canal Medular , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Laminectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The Tower of London (TOL) test has probably become the most often used task to assess planning ability in clinical and experimental settings. Since its implementation, efforts were made to provide a task version with adequate psychometric properties, but extensive normative data are not publicly available until now. The computerized TOL-Freiburg Version (TOL-F) was developed based on theory-grounded task analyses, and its psychometric adequacy has been repeatedly demonstrated in several studies but often with small and selective samples. METHOD: In the present study, we now report reliability estimates and normative data for the TOL-F stratified for age, sex, and education from a large population-representative sample collected in the Gutenberg Health Study in Mainz, Germany (n=7703; 40-80 years). RESULTS: The present data confirm previously reported adequate indices of reliability (>.70) of the TOL-F. We also provide normative data for the TOL-F stratified for age (5-year intervals), sex, and education (low vs. high education). CONCLUSIONS: Together, its adequate reliability and the representative age-, sex-, and education-fair normative data render the computerized TOL-F a suitable diagnostic instrument to assess planning ability. (JINS, 2019, 25, 520-529).
Asunto(s)
Función Ejecutiva/fisiología , Desarrollo Humano/fisiología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To determine whether there is a correlation between the type of ossification and radiological parameters, modified thoracic JOA scores, and complications in patients with thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum treated by posterior thoracic surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 48 patients with thoracic myelopathy caused by single-level thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum who underwent thoracic posterior approach surgery in our Hospital o between December 2013 to December 2018. Patients were divided into unilateral, bilateral, and bridged groups in axial position, and beak and round groups in sagittal position. The differences were analyzed according to the ossification morphology. RESULTS: In axial myelopathy, there was no significant difference in preop and postop JOA scores and RR among the three groups in axial position (P = 0.884). In sagittal view, there was no significant difference in preoperative JOA score between the two groups (P = 0.710), while the postop JOA score and the recovery rate in the beak group were significantly lower than that of the round group (P = 0.010, P = 0.034). Two-way ANOVA showed that sagittal morphology had a significant effect on postop JOA score (P = 0.028), but axial morphology don't (P = 0.431); there was no interaction between them (P = 0.444). For the recovery rate, sagittal morphology also had a significant effect (P = 0.043), but axial ossification don't (P = 0.998); there was no interaction between them (P = 0.479). CONCLUSION: Sagittal morphology had a significant adverse effect on postop JOA score and surgical outcome, while axial morphology had no effect on surgical outcome, and there was no interaction between sagittal morphology and axial morphology.
Asunto(s)
Ligamento Amarillo , Osificación Heterotópica , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ligamento Amarillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Ligamento Amarillo/cirugía , Osificación Heterotópica/diagnóstico por imagen , Osificación Heterotópica/etiología , Osificación Heterotópica/cirugía , Osteogénesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: O-arm computer navigation-assisted technology (OACNAT) has been widely used in the treatment of thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum (TOLF) in recent years, but there are few in-depth studies on the safety and effectiveness of this approach. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of accurate surgical treatment for TOLF with OACNAT. METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2018, the clinical data of 64 patients with TOLF who underwent laminectomy and internal fixation in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into group A (with OACNAT, n = 33) and group B (without OACNAT, n = 31) according to the application of OACNAT during the operation. The possible operation-related variables, imaging results, and clinical effects were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In terms of demographics, there were no significant differences between group A and group B in age, sex, body mass index, smoking, drinking, heart disease, hypertension and diabetes (P > 0.05). In terms of operation-related variables, imaging results, and clinical efficacy, there were significant differences in operation time, wound length, postoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, JOA score improvement rate, accuracy of screw placement, number of intraoperative fluoroscopy procedures, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage between group A and group B (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other variables between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). In contrast to group A, in group B, 2 patients had incorrect segmental localization, 3 patients had residual ossified ligamentum flavum after the operation, and 1 patient had postoperative neurologic impairment. On further analysis, compared with group B, group A had a shorter operation time, more accurate screw placement, fewer fluoroscopy procedures, higher JOA score improvement rate, and lower incidence of complications. CONCLUSIONS: The use of OACNAT accurately located the position, size, shape, and boundary of ossification of the ligamentum flavum during the operation, which could guide accurate decompression and improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. This approach not only reduced the incidence of incorrect segmental localization and incomplete or excessive decompression but also reduced the risk of related complications and improved the accuracy, safety, and effectiveness of the operation.
Asunto(s)
Ligamento Amarillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Ligamento Amarillo/cirugía , Neuronavegación/métodos , Osificación Heterotópica/diagnóstico por imagen , Osificación Heterotópica/cirugía , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between morphological changes in thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL) and postoperative neurological recovery after thoracic posterior fusion surgery. Changes of OPLL morphology and postoperative recovery in cases with T-OPLL have not been examined. METHODS: In this prospective study, the authors evaluated data from 44 patients (23 male and 21 female) who underwent posterior decompression and fusion surgery with instrumentation for the treatment of T-OPLL at our hospital. The patients' mean age at surgery was 50.7 years (range 38-68 years). The minimum duration of follow-up was 2 years. The location of thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (T-OLF), T-OLF at the OPLL level, OPLL morphology, fusion range, estimated blood loss, operative time, pre- and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and JOA recovery rate were investigated. Reconstructed sagittal multislice CT images were obtained before and at 3 and 6 months and 1 and 2 years after surgery. The basic fusion area was 3 vertebrae above and below the OPLL lesion. All parameters were compared between patients with and without continuity across the disc space at the OPLL at 3 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The preoperative morphology of OPLL was discontinuous across the disc space between the rostral and caudal ossification regions on sagittal CT images in all but one of the patients. Postoperatively, these segments became continuous in 42 patients (97.7%; occurring by 6.6 months on average) without progression of OPLL thickness. Patients with continuity at 3 months had significantly lower rates of diabetes mellitus (p < 0.05) and motor palsy in the lower extremities (p < 0.01). The group with continuity also had significantly higher mean postoperative JOA scores at 3 (p < 0.01) and 6 (p < 0.05) months and mean JOA recovery rates at 3 and 6 months (both p < 0.01) after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperatively, discontinuity of rostral and caudal ossified lesions was found on CT in all patients but one of this group of 44 patients who needed surgery for T-OPLL. Rigid fixation with instrumentation may have allowed these segments to connect at the OPLL. Such OPLL continuity at an early stage after surgery may accelerate spinal cord recovery.
Asunto(s)
Ligamento Amarillo/cirugía , Ligamentos Longitudinales/cirugía , Osificación del Ligamento Longitudinal Posterior/cirugía , Recuperación de la Función/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteogénesis/fisiología , Parálisis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugíaRESUMEN
Planning ahead the consequences of future actions is a prototypical executive function. In clinical and experimental neuropsychology, disc-transfer tasks like the Tower of London (TOL) are commonly used for the assessment of planning ability. Previous psychometric evaluations have, however, yielded a poor reliability of measuring planning performance with the TOL. Based on theory-grounded task analyses and a systematic problem selection, the computerized TOL-Freiburg version (TOL-F) was developed to improve the task's psychometric properties for diagnostic applications. Here, we report reliability estimates for the TOL-F from two large samples collected in Mainz, Germany (n = 3,770; 40-80 years) and in Vienna, Austria (n = 830; 16-84 years). Results show that planning accuracy on the TOL-F possesses an adequate internal consistency and split-half reliability (>0.7) that are stable across the adult life span while the TOL-F covers a broad range of graded difficulty even in healthy adults, making it suitable for both research and clinical application.