Multicentric clinical evaluation of a computed tomography-based fully automated deep neural network for aortic maximum diameter and volumetric measurements.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate a fully automatic deep learning-based method (augmented radiology for vascular aneurysm [ARVA]) for aortic segmentation and simultaneous diameter and volume measurements. METHODS: A clinical validation dataset was constructed from preoperative and postoperative aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans for assessing these functions. The dataset totaled 350 computed tomography angiography scans from 216 patients treated at two different hospitals. ARVA's ability to segment the aorta into seven morphologically based aortic segments and measure maximum outer-to-outer wall transverse diameters and compute volumes for each was compared with the measurements of six experts (ground truth) and thirteen clinicians. RESULTS: Ground truth (experts') measurements of diameters and volumes were manually performed for all aortic segments. The median absolute diameter difference between ground truth and ARVA was 1.6 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-1.7; and 1.6 mm [95% CI, 1.6-1.7]) between ground truth and clinicians. ARVA produced measurements within the clinical acceptable range with a proportion of 85.5% (95% CI, 83.5-86.3) compared with the clinicians' 86.0% (95% CI, 83.9-86.0). The median volume similarity error ranged from 0.93 to 0.95 in the main trunk and achieved 0.88 in the iliac arteries. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the reliability of a fully automated artificial intelligence-driven solution capable of quick aortic segmentation and analysis of both diameter and volume for each segment.

STABILISE (Stent-Assisted Balloon-Induced Intimal Disruption and Relamination in Aortic Dissection Repair) Is Associated With Good Anatomical Results on the Distal Thoracoabdominal Aorta at 2 Years.

PURPOSE: The aim of this comparative study was to evaluate the increased aortic diameter of the distal aorta after implementing the STABILISE technique in complicated type B aortic dissection (AD). DESIGN: This is a comparative monocentric retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent an STABILISE procedure for complicated AD between 2018 and 2020 were included and compared with a historic cohort treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) alone. Aortic diameters were measured at 6 different levels on the thoracic and abdominal aorta. The primary end point was an increased aortic diameter at 1 and 2 years. The exclusion criterion was the absence of a computed tomography (CT) scan at 1 or 2 years. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were included: 24 in the TEVAR group and 31 in the STABILISE group. At the level of the stent graft, there was a decrease in aortic diameters in both groups without significant differences. At the level of the distal aorta, there was an increase in aortic diameters in both groups without significant differences. There were significantly more patients in the TEVAR group with an unfavorable increase in aortic diameter >5 mm of the distal aorta at 2 years than in the STABILISE group: 8 (33%) vs 1 (3%) (p=0.01). For chronic ADs, a significantly greater increase in aortic diameters of the distal aorta was observed in the STABILISE group. CONCLUSIONS: The STABILISE technique is technically feasible and potentially leads to decreased longer re-intervention rates; indeed, more patients had an unfavorable increase in aortic diameter in the TEVAR group than in the STABILISE group at 2 years. The high rate of long-term distal aortic aneurysm progression and reintervention after TEVAR alone suggests that this option is not sufficient to definitively treat these complex patients. CLINICAL IMPACT: This article reported the results of stent assisted balloon induced intimal disruption and relamination (STABILISE) with a follow-up at 2 years. This is the first comparative study between STABILISE, which has emerged as a new technique inducing aortic remodeling and therefore better long-term outcome, and the standard technique TEVAR alone. STABILISE technique is associated with good results on the distal aorta at 2 years with a rate of patient with unfavorable aortic diameter evolution greater in TEVAR group compared to STABILISE group and could improve the long-term results on the distal aorta by inducing extensive aortic remodeling.

Prognostic value of pulmonary artery diameter/aorta diameter ratio in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: The ratio of pulmonary artery diameter (PAD) to ascending aortic diameter (AoD) has been reported to be a prognostic marker in several lung diseases; however, the usefulness of this tool in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is unknown. Here, we aimed to determine the long-term prognostic value of the PAD/AoD ratio in patients with APE. METHODS: A total of 275 patients diagnosed with APE at our tertiary care center between November 2016 and February 2022 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of long-term mortality and their PAD/AoD ratios were compared. RESULTS: Long-term mortality was observed in 48 patients during the median follow-up of 59 (39-73) months. The patients were divided into two groups for analysis: group 1, consisting of 227 patients without recorded mortality, and group 2, consisting of 48 patients with documented mortality. A multivariate Cox regression model indicated that the PAD/AoD ratio has the potential to predict long-term mortality (HR: 2.9116, 95% CI: 1.1544-7.3436, p = 0.023). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that there was no discernible difference in discriminative ability between the simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) and PAD/AoD ratio (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.679 vs. 0.684, respectively, p = 0.937). The long-term predictive ability of the PAD/AoD ratio was not inferior to the sPESI score. CONCLUSIONS: The PAD/AoD ratio, which can be easily calculated from pulmonary computed tomography, may be a useful parameter for determining the prognosis of APE patients.

A Ratio Between Infrarenal and Suprarenal Aortic Diameters Corrects for Absolute Aortic Diameter Variations due to Patients' Sex and Body Size.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic diameters may differ significantly between patients with different gender and body size. The aim of this study was to relate absolute aortic diameters to age, sex, height, and weight of the patients and to correct for these factors by calculating the ratio between the infrarenal and the suprarenal aortic diameters. METHODS: A total of 458 patients who underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between 2004 and 2018 were included. The aortic anatomy in this group of elective EVAR patients was compared with a control group of 75 patients without an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aortic diameter was measured at 4 suprarenal points and 4 infrarenal points. Ratios were calculated by dividing the mean infrarenal neck diameter by 4 suprarenal measurements. RESULTS: Patients in the aneurysm group had significantly larger suprarenal and infrarenal aortic diameters. The ratios between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and all 4 suprarenal measurements were larger in the AAA group than in the control group. In both groups, there was a significant correlation between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and sex, height, weight, and body surface area (BSA). However, in both groups, all 4 ratios between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and suprarenal aortic diameters were not correlated with age, sex, height, weight, or BSA, except for the ratio between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and the aortic diameter measurement proximal to the upper renal artery, which was correlated to weight and BSA in the control group. CONCLUSION: The mean infrarenal neck diameter is correlated with sex, height, weight, and BSA. However, when the suprarenal aortic diameter was used as an internal control for the mean infrarenal neck diameter, we were able to correct for these variations in aortic diameters due to sex and body size. The clinical relevance of this ratio in patients treated by EVAR has yet to be assessed in future research. CLINICAL IMPACT: In the assessment for EVAR suitability the absolute diameter of the aneurysm neck is taken into account. We believe that using absolute diameters is not the appropriate way to assess this suitability, but that patient characteristics such as age, gender and body size, should be factored into this assessment. In this paper, we show that suprarenal and infrarenal aortic diameters are both significantly increased in patients with an aneurysm compared with patients without an aneurysm. Besides, we found that mean infrarenal aortic diameter is correlated with sex, height, weight, and body surface area. Finally, we propose a new ratio system, using suprarenal diameters as an internal control, to correct for aortic diameter variations due to sex and body size.

Trends among platelet function, arterial calcium, and vascular function measures.

Arterial tonometry and vascular calcification measures are useful in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. Prior studies found associations between tonometry measures, arterial calcium, and CVD risk. Activated platelets release angiopoietin-1 and other factors, which may connect vascular structure and platelet function. We analyzed arterial tonometry, platelet function, aortic, thoracic and coronary calcium, and thoracic and abdominal aorta diameters measured in the Framingham Heart Study Gen3/NOS/OMNI-2 cohorts (n = 3,429, 53.7% women, mean age 54.4 years ±9.3). Platelet reactivity in whole blood or platelet-rich plasma was assessed using 5 assays and 7 agonists. We analyzed linear mixed effects models with platelet reactivity phenotypes as outcomes, adjusting for CVD risk factors and family structure. Higher arterial calcium trended with higher platelet reactivity, whereas larger aortic diameters trended with lower platelet reactivity. Characteristic impedance (Zc) and central pulse pressure positively trended with various platelet traits, while pulse wave velocity and Zc negatively trended with collagen, ADP, and epinephrine traits. All results did not pass a stringent multiple test correction threshold (p < 2.22e-04). The diameter trends were consistent with lower shear environments invoking less platelet reactivity. The vessel calcium trends were consistent with subclinical atherosclerosis and platelet activation being inter-related.

What is the context? Prior research has reported that measures of vascular system-influencing proteins such as angiopoietin-2, arterial calcium plaque formation, and arterial stiffness assessed by tonometry are associated with CVD risk.Since activated platelets produce and release vascular proteins like angiopoietin when activated, and microparticles that interact with endothelium, release of the foregoing mediators could provide one way in which vascular structure and platelet function influence each other.To our knowledge, no prior studies have directly investigated associations between these measures in a large sample. This investigation relates platelet function to arterial tonometry, aortic and arterial diameter, and arterial calcium measures in the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Gen3/NOS/OMNI-2 cohorts (n = 3,429).What's new? Generally, higher arterial calcium measures trended with higher platelet reactivity, whereas larger aortic diameters trended with lower platelet reactivity.Arterial tonometry measures had positive and negative trends with platelet functions, including platelet measures with opposite relations to negative-inverse carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (niCFPWV) and characteristic impedance (Zc). All tonometry, calcium, and diameter results did not reach a more stringent multiple testing threshold (p < 2.22e-04).What's the impact? The aortic diameter trends are consistent with lower shear stress invoking less platelet reactivity.The vessel calcium trends are consistent with increased vascular calcium buildup that could provoke platelet activation, thereby contributing to increased blood clot risk. Conversely, increased platelet activation could contribute to increased inflammation and thrombosis, leading to calcification in the arterial wall.

Ascending Aorta Dissection Before 5.5 cm Diameter; "It Wasn't Raining When Noah Built the Ark".

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare mean maximum ascending aortic diameter at the time of acute aortic dissection with the current surgical threshold for elective ascending aortic operations on non-syndromic thoracic aortic aneurysms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive non-syndromic adult patients admitted for acute type A aortic dissection in a single tertiary centre were prospectively enrolled from April 2020 to March 2021. The primary endpoint was the difference between mean maximum aortic diameter at the time of dissection and the 5.5 cm threshold for elective repair. Secondary endpoints included 30-day/in-hospital mortality, aortic length and comparison with normal controls, length/height ratio index, "actual" preoperative Euroscore II and "predicted" Euroscore II if electively operated. RESULTS: Among 31 patients ageing 67.3±12.03 years on average, mean maximum aortic diameter at the time of dissection was 5.13±0.66 cm, significantly lower than the guidelines-derived surgical threshold of 5.5 cm (p=0.004). Mean aortic length was 11±1.47 cm, also significantly longer compared normal controls reported in the literature (p<0.001). The 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 35.5%. Mean length/height ratio index was 6.18±0.76 cm/m. Finally, mean "actual" preoperative Euroscore II was 10.43±4.07 which was significantly higher than the 1.47±0.57 "predicted" Euroscore II (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The maximum aortic diameter at the time of acute type A aortic dissection of non-syndromic cases was significantly lower than the current recommendation for elective repair. Lowering of the current diameter-based surgical threshold of 5.5 cm may be profitable in terms of prevention, but further investigations should be undertaken. Length-based thresholds could also add to timely aortic dissection prevention.

Sex-specific criteria for repair should be utilized in patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Female patients are more likely to undergo repair of intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at smaller aortic diameter compared with male patients. By adjusting for inherent anatomic differences between sexes, aortic size index (ASI) and aortic height index (AHI) may provide an additional method for guiding treatment. We therefore analyzed sex-specific criteria for AAA repair using aortic diameter, ASI, and AHI. METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent AAA repair between 2003 and 2019 in the Vascular Quality Initiative database. The Dubois and Dubois formula was used to calculate body surface area; aortic diameter was divided by body surface area to calculate ASI. Aortic diameter was divided by height to calculate AHI. Cumulative distribution curves were used to plot the proportion of patients who underwent repair of ruptured aneurysm according to aortic diameter, ASI, and AHI. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify the association of female sex with perioperative mortality and any major postoperative complication. RESULTS: We identified 55,647 patients, of whom 12,664 were female (20%). For both intact and rupture repair, female patients were older, less likely to undergo endovascular aneurysm repair, and more likely to have comorbid conditions. Female patients underwent repair at smaller median aortic diameter compared with male patients for intact (5.4 vs 5.5 cm; P < .001) and rupture repair (6.7 vs 7.7 cm; P < .001). However, ASI was higher in female patients for both intact (3.1 vs 2.7 cm/m2; P < .001) and rupture repair (3.8 vs 3.7 cm/m2; P < .001), whereas AHI was higher in female patients for intact repair (3.3 vs 3.1 cm/m; P < .001) but lower for rupture repair (4.1 vs 4.3 cm/m; P < .001). When analyzing the cumulative distribution of rupture repair in male patients, 12% of rupture repairs were performed at an aortic diameter below 5.5 cm. To achieve the same proportion of rupture repair in female patients, the repair diameter was only 4.9 cm. However, when ASI and AHI were used, female and male patients both reached 12% of rupture repair at an ASI of 2.7 cm/m2 and an AHI of 3.0 cm/m. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides data to strongly support the sex-specific 5.0-cm aortic diameter threshold suggested for repair in female patients by the Society for Vascular Surgery. The high percentage of patients undergoing rupture repair below 5.5 cm in male patients and 5.0 cm in female patients highlights the need to better identify patients at risk of rupture at smaller aortic diameters.

Optimal Sizing of Aortic Stent Graft for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury Considering Hypotension-Related Decrease in Aortic Diameter.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the optimal sizing of an aortic stent graft in patients with blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI), considering the decrease in diameter in hypovolemic status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2014 to 2020, 25 patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for BTAI were included. Hemodynamic parameters in the emergency room (ER) and just before the main procedure (MP) were collected. The aortic sizes were measured during initial computed tomography (CT) on arrival in the ER, aortography (AG) during TEVAR, and final CT in the outpatient clinic. The appropriateness of the inserted stent graft size was investigated. RESULTS: The mean values of the final CT/initial CT and final CT/initial AG (proximal descending thoracic aorta [pDTA]) were 113% and 105%, respectively. The final CT/initial CT (pDTA; 122.2% vs 108.8%, p=0.01) and final CT/initial AG (pDTA; 113.4% vs 102.1%, p<0.01) were significantly higher in patients with systolic blood pressure (SBP; MP) ≤90 mm Hg. The final CT/initial CT (pDTA; 120.4% vs 109.0%, p=0.03) and final CT/initial AG (pDTA; 111.4% vs 102.6%, p=0.01) were significantly higher in patients with mean blood pressure (MBP; MP) ≤70 mm Hg. On an average, the inserted stent grafts were oversized by 130% on initial AG. Based on the final CT scan, the inserted stent graft was as large as 122%. CONCLUSION: In the case of hemodynamic instability with SBP (MP) ≤90 mm Hg or MBP (MP) ≤70 mm Hg, despite adequate resuscitation, an oversized TEVAR stent graft of 130% can reduce the occurrence of endoleak and is sufficiently safe. CLINICAL IMPACT: Despite sufficient resuscitation, the aorta size measured during TEVAR in patients with hemodynamic instability with systolic BP <90 mmHg and mean BP <70 mmHg may be reduced by more than 15% compared to that in the normal state. In this study, the mean size of the stent grafts were oversized by 130% on initial aortography, but were oversized by 122% based on final CT. When the stent graft was oversized by 130% in TEVAR for hemodynamic unstable patient with BTAI, the patient reached the proper oversizing subsequent to hemodynamic recovery.

Clinical Effect of Pulmonary Artery Diameter/Ascending Aorta Diameter Ratio on Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) progress to heart failure (HF), although some demonstrate left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (LVRR), which is associated with better outcomes. The pulmonary artery diameter (PAD) to ascending aortic diameter (AoD) ratio has been used as a prognostic predictor in patients with HF, although this tool's usefulness in predicting LVRR remains unknown.Methods and Results: Data from a prospective observational study of 211 patients diagnosed in 2000-2020 with DCM were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty-nine patients with New York Heart Association class I or II HF were included. LVRR was observed in 23 patients (33.3%). The mean LV ejection fraction (29%) and LV end-diastolic dimension (64.5 mm) were similar in patients with and without LVRR. The PAD/AoD ratio was significantly lower in patients with LVRR than those without (81.4% vs. 92.4%, respectively; P=0.003). The optimal PAD/AoD cut-off value for detecting LVRR was 0.9 according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Multivariate analysis identified a PAD/AoD ratio ≥0.9 as an independent predictor of presence/absence of LVRR. Cardiac events were significantly more common in patients with a PAD/AoD ratio ≥0.9 than those with a ratio <0.9, after a median follow up of 2.5 years (log-rank, P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The PAD/AoD ratio can predict LVRR in patients with DCM.

Potential influencing factors of aortic diameter at specific segments in population with cardiovascular risk.

BACKGROUND: Aortic diameter is a critical parameter for the diagnosis of aortic dilated diseases. Aortic dilation has some common risk factors with cardiovascular diseases. This study aimed to investigate potential influence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and the measures of subclinical atherosclerosis on aortic diameter of specific segments among adults. METHODS: Four hundred and eight patients with cardiovascular risk factors were prospectively recruited in the observational study. Comprehensive transthoracic M-mode, 2-dimensional Doppler echocardiographic studies were performed using commercial and clinical diagnostic ultrasonography techniques. The aortic dimensions were assessed at different levels: (1) the annulus, (2) the mid-point of the sinuses of Valsalva, (3) the sinotubular junction, (4) the ascending aorta at the level of its largest diameter, (5) the transverse arch (including proximal arch, mid arch, distal arch), (6) the descending aorta posterior to the left atrium, and (7) the abdominal aorta just distal to the origin of the renal arteries. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used for evaluating aortic diameter-related risk factors, including common cardiovascular risk factors, co-morbidities, subclinical atherosclerosis, lipid profile, and hematological parameters. RESULTS: Significant univariate relations were found between aortic diameter of different levels and most traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Carotid intima-media thickness was significantly correlated with diameter of descending and abdominal aorta. Multivariate linear regression showed potential effects of age, sex, body surface area and some other cardiovascular risk factors on aortic diameter enlargement. Among them, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol had a significantly positive effect on the diameter of ascending and abdominal aorta. Diastolic blood pressure was observed for the positive associations with diameters of five thoracic aortic segments, while systolic blood pressure was only independently related to mid arch diameter. CONCLUSION: Aortic segmental diameters were associated with diastolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, atherosclerosis diseases and other traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and some determinants still need to be clarified for a better understanding of aortic dilation diseases.

Standardizing Methods of Reading CT Maximum Aortic Diameters Amongst Experts Reduces Variations and Discordance, Improving Accuracy.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the method of obtaining abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maximum diameters based on computed tomographic angiography, and the reproducibility and accuracy of different methods have recently been debated due to advancements in imaging. This study compared the two most common methods based on orthogonal planes and centerline of flow to determine the discordances and accuracy amongst experiences readers. METHODS: The computed tomographic angiography max diameters of 148 AAAs were measured by three experienced observers, including a vascular surgeon, a radiologist and an imaging cardiologist. Observers used two different methods with standardized protocols: multiplanar reformations based on orthogonal planes, and a software using 3D aortic reconstructions to create centerline flow lumen providing diameters based on cross sections perpendicular to this lumen. Agreements and reliability of measurement methods were assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient and Bland - Altman analysis. Discordances between measurements of the methods and the original reported measurement, as well as outside hospitals were compared. RESULTS: The average age of the cohort was 75 years and aortic diameters ranged from 3.8 to 9.6 cm. For orthogonal readings, there were agreements within 3 mm between 86% and 92% of the time, while centerline - reading agreement was between 88% and 94%, which was not statistically significant. The intra-class correlation coefficient was high between method type and between readers. Within methods, agreement was between 0.96 and 0.97, while within - reader agreement measures was between 0.96 and 0.98. In comparison to the original and the outside hospital reports, 10% ≥ of the original and 20% ≥ of the outside hospital reported measurements were discordant between the readers. CONCLUSION: Maximal AAA measurements can have substantial variability leading to clinical significance and change in patient management and outcomes. Based on the results, orthogonal and centerline measurement methods have equally high agreements and concordance within 3 mm and low variations at a high volume center. However, when compared to the official read reports, there is high discordance rates that can significantly alter patient outcomes. A standardized method of measurement maximum diameter can reduce variations and discordances among different methods.

Impact of Aortic Diameter Measurements at Three Anatomical Landmarks on Left Ventricular Output Calculation in Neonates.

OBJECTIVES: To assess reproducibility and accuracy of left ventricular output (LVO) quantifications in neonates, when left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTD) was measured at the hinges of the aortic valve (AV), at the aortic sinus (AS), and at the sinotubular junction (STJ). METHODS: This was an observational study. In the first cohort of very preterm neonates, we assessed intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of LVOTD measured at the AV, AS, and STJ and of the corresponding LVO. In the second cohort of older neonates, we compared paired LVO measurements by echo and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: In the first cohort of 48 neonates, mean (standard deviation) weight and age at scan were 1046 (302) g and 28.1 (2.7) weeks. Interobserver bias (95% limits of agreement [LOA]) for LVOTD at the AV, AS, and STJ was 0 (-0.3 to 0.3) mm, 0 (-0.7 to 0.7) mm, and 0 (-0.8 to 0.7) mm, respectively. Interobserver bias (95% LOA) for the corresponding LVO was -1.3 (-31 to 33) ml/kg/min, -0.5 (-88 to 87) ml/kg/min, and -7.2 (-83 to 69) ml/kg/min, respectively. In the second cohort of 10 neonates, median (range) weight and age at scan were 1942 (970-3640) g and 37.2 (31.7-39.8) weeks. LVO measured at the AV showed stronger agreement with MRI: bias (LOA) -10.6 (-74 to 52) ml/kg/min, compared to LVO measured at AS and STJ: 194 (-0.5 to 388) ml/kg/min and 43 (-72 to 159) ml/kg/min respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility and accuracy of LVO quantification by echo were better when aortic diameter was measured at AV.

Can We Better Differentiate Type A Dissections: Evaluating the Role of Aortic Ratios.

OBJECTIVES: Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is hypothesised as a progression of aneurysmal dilation, but 60% of patients in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (iRAD) registry had a maximum aortic diameter (MAD)<55 mm. We aim to demonstrate that size ratios and aortic wall stress, assessed using a simplified markers, are unique to aortic patients who have had adverse events (ATAAD) compared to those who have not (thoracic aortic aneurysm [TAA]). METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent aortic intervention at Waikato Hospital, New Zealand between 2015-2020, comparing dissection (ATAAD) to TAA patients. MAD; ratio of MAD to standardised-points within the aorta; and MAD-to-height collected from computed tomography (CT)-scans of all patients was undertaken. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-analysis to determine cut-off point for each marker was undertaken together with multivariable logistic regression comparing both cohorts, cross-validated by propensity-score matched analysis. RESULTS: Cohort of 215 patients, 78 (36.3%) ATAAD and 137 (63.7%) TAA; median age at intervention 63.3 years, 52 (24.2%) females, both cohorts matched for size. Using the entire cohort, the MAD: sinus of Valsalva (SoV) ratio>1.06 (cut-off value) had 4.5-times greater association with ATAAD (95%CI 1.46-13.8) and a 0.1-unit increased conferred 1.45-times greater association with ATAAD (95%CI 1.00-2.08). MAD>55 mm only seen in 33.3% of ATAAD (n=26/78), and not associated with ATAAD (OR 1.88, 95%CI 0.64-5.51). Compared to MAD, MAD:SoV ratio had greater sensitivity (33% vs 73%), lower number-needed-to-treat (17.9 vs 2.7) and superior discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] 0.54 vs 0.71). Findings were consistent with propensity score matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS: MAD:SoV ratio significantly correlates with ATAAD (4.5 times), with superior sensitivity, discrimination, and attributable-risk-percentage compared to MAD alone.

Reproducibility of Aorta Segmentation on 4D Flow MRI in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic aorta parameters can be derived from 4D flow MRI, but this requires lumen segmentation. In both commercially available and research 4D flow MRI software tools, lumen segmentation is mostly (semi-)automatically performed and subsequently manually improved by an observer. Since the segmentation variability, together with 4D flow MRI data and image processing algorithms, will contribute to the reproducibility of patient-specific flow properties, the observer's lumen segmentation reproducibility and repeatability needs to be assessed. PURPOSE: To determine the interexamination, interobserver reproducibility, and intraobserver repeatability of aortic lumen segmentation on 4D flow MRI. STUDY TYPE: Prospective and retrospective. POPULATION: A healthy volunteer cohort of 10 subjects who underwent 4D flow MRI twice. Also, a clinical cohort of six subjects who underwent 4D flow MRI once. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T; time-resolved three-directional and 3D velocity-encoded sequence (4D flow MRI). ASSESSMENT: The thoracic aorta was segmented on the 4D flow MRI in five systolic phases. By positioning six planes perpendicular to a segmentation's centerline, the aorta was divided into five segments. The volume, surface area, centerline length, maximal diameter, and curvature radius were determined for each segment. STATISTICAL TESTS: To assess the reproducibility, the coefficient of variation (COV), Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. RESULTS: The interexamination and interobserver reproducibility and intraobserver repeatability were comparable for each parameter. For both cohorts there was very good reproducibility and repeatability for volume, surface area, and centerline length (COV = 10-32%, r = 0.54-0.95 and ICC = 0.65-0.99), excellent reproducibility and repeatability for maximal diameter (COV = 3-11%, r = 0.94-0.99, ICC = 0.94-0.99), and good reproducibility and repeatability for curvature radius (COV = 25-62%, r = 0.73-0.95, ICC = 0.84-0.97). DATA CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated no major reproducibility and repeatability limitations for 4D flow MRI aortic lumen segmentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Editor's Choice - Cohort Study Examining the Association Between Abdominal Aortic Size and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Aortic and Peripheral Occlusive and Aneurysmal Disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine whether there were independent associations between abdominal aortic diameter, size index, and height index and the risk of major adverse events in patients referred for treatment of various types of aortic and peripheral occlusive and aneurysmal disease (APOAD). METHODS: In total, 1 752 participants with a variety of APOADs were prospectively recruited between 2002 and 2020 and had a maximum abdominal aortic diameter, aortic size index (aortic diameter relative to body surface area), and aortic height index (aortic diameter relative to height) measured by ultrasound at recruitment. Participants were followed for a median of 4.6 years (interquartile range 2.0 - 8.0 years) to record outcome events, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), peripheral artery surgery, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) events (rupture or repair), and all cause mortality. The association between aortic size and events was assessed using Cox proportional hazard analysis. The ability of aortic size to improve risk of events classification was assessed using the net reclassification index (NRI). RESULTS: After adjusting for other risk factors, larger aortic diameter was associated with an increased risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 - 1.31), requirement for peripheral artery surgery (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.90 - 2.22), AAA events (HR 3.01, 95% CI 2.77 - 3.26), and all cause mortality (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08 - 1.32). Findings were similar for aortic size and aortic height indices. According to the NRI, all three aortic size measures significantly improved classification of risk of peripheral artery surgery and AAA events but not MACE. Aortic size index, but not aortic diameter or aortic height index, significantly improved the classification of all cause mortality risk. CONCLUSION: Larger abdominal aortic diameter, size index, and height index are all independently associated with an increased risk of major adverse events in patients with established vascular disease.

Analysis of ascending aortic diameter and long-term prognosis in patients with ascending aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to review the ascending aortic diameter of patients undergoing surgery for AAD in China and its influence on prognosis. METHODS: In the period between January 2018 and January 2020, 265 patients eligible for analysis of ascending aorta were included in this study. The maximum diameter of the ascending aorta was assessed using preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan for patients. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the ascending aorta of the reference population was 48.16 ± 9.37 mm, and the percentage of subjects with an aorta <55 mm was 80.38%. In this study, we found that BMI, hypertension, and bicuspid aortic valve are the main factors affecting the widening of the ascending aorta, and the diameter of the ascending aorta in patients with AAD is negatively correlated with the patient's long-term prognosis. However, there is no significant difference in survival rates among patients with different ascending aortic diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Ascending aortas with smaller diameter are also prone to dissection, most of which occur at a lower surgical threshold than recommended by current guidelines. Therefore, the diameter of ascending aorta cannot be used as an independent risk factor for high-risk patients with aortic dissection, but it can be used as an important indicator to evaluate the long-term prognosis of patients.

Endograft Conformability in Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Purpose: To compare the impact of 2 commercially available custom-made fenestrated endografts on patient anatomy. Materials and Methods: The records of 234 patients who underwent fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm from March 2002 to July 2016 in 2 hospitals were screened to identify those who had pre- and postoperative computed tomography angiography assessments with a slice thickness of ≤2 mm. The search identified 145 patients for further analysis: 110 patients (mean age 72.4±7.1 years; 94 men) who had been treated with the Zenith Fenestrated (ZF) endograft and 35 patients (mean age 72.3±7.3 years; 30 men) treated with the Fenestrated Anaconda (FA) endograft. Measurements included aortic diameters at the level of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and renal arteries, target vessel angles, target vessel clock positions, and the target vessel tortuosity index. Variables were tested for inter- and intraobserver agreement. Results: There was a good agreement between observers in all tested variables. The native anatomy changed in both groups after endograft implantation. In the ZF group, changes were seen in the angles of the celiac artery (p=0.012), SMA (p=0.022), left renal artery (LRA) (p<0.001), and the right renal artery (RRA) (p<0.001); the aortic diameter at the SMA level (p<0.001); and the LRA (p<0.001) and RRA (p<0.001) clock positions. In the FA group, changes were seen in the angles of the LRA (p=0.001) and RRA (p<0.001) and in the SMA tortuosity index (p=0.044). Between group differences in changes were seen for the aortic diameters at the SMA and renal artery levels (p<0.001 for both) and the LRA clock position (p=0.019). Conclusion: Both custom-made fenestrated endografts altered vascular anatomy. The data suggest a higher conformability of the Fenestrated Anaconda endograft compared with the Zenith Fenestrated.

The expression and significance of NF-κB, MMP1, and MMP2 in rats with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

This study aimed to investigate the expression and significance of NF-κB, matrix metal protein1 (MMP1), and matrix metal protein2 (MMP2) in rats with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). 48 Wistar rats were collected, then they were divided into an experiment group and a control group (n=24). The rats in the experiment group were used to carry out an abdominal aortic aneurysm modeling, while the rats in the control group were infused with a same dose of saline through catheters. qRT-PCR and ELISA were used to detect the expressions of EGF and VEGF-C in skin tissues and mRNA of NF-κB, MMP1, and MMP2 in their abdominal aorta. A vernier caliper was used to measure the diameter of their abdominal aorta. Western blot was used to detect the expressions of NF-κB, MMP1, and MMP2 in their abdominal aorta. In the experiment group, the abdominal aorta of the rats expanded to some extent after they were infused compared to that before they were infused (P< 0.05), and the abdominal aorta of them was significantly larger than that of the rats in the control group. On the 3rd week after modeling, the abdominal aorta of the rats expanded more obviously compared to that after they were infused for a while in the experiment group, and the expansion rate of the diameter was (57.19 ± 4.67)% (P< 0.05). Protein expression levels of NF-κB, MMP1, and MMP2 in the abdominal aorta of the rats increased significantly in the experiment group compared to those of the rats in the control group (P<0.05). The increase of NF-κB, MMP1, and MMP2 may be related to the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm in abdominal aortic aneurysm models of rats.

Is the aortic size index relevant as a predictor of abdominal aortic aneurysm? A population-based prospective study: the Tromsø study.

Objectives. The normal aortic diameter (AD) varies with gender, age and body surface area (BSA). The aortic size index (ASI) is defined as the AD divided by BSA. The primary aim of this study was to investigate if ASI is a predictor of development AAA, and to compare the predictive impact of ASI to that of the absolute AD. Design. Population-based prospective study including 4161 individuals (53.2% women) from the Tromsø study with two valid ultrasound measurements of the AD and no AAA at baseline (Tromsø 4, 1994). The primary outcome was AAA (AD ≥30 mm) in Tromsø 5 (2001). A secondary outcome was aortic growth of >5 mm over 7 years. Estimates of relative risk were calculated in logistic regression models. The main exposure variable was ASI. Adjustments were made for age, gender, smoking, body mass index, total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and hypertension. Results. In total, 124 incident AAAs (20% among women) were detected. In adjusted analyses, both ASI and AD were strong predictors of AAA, with similar results for men and women. Both ASI and AD were also significant predictors of aortic growth >5 mm. In comparison, AD was superior to ASI as a predictor of both endpoints. Conclusions. ASI was a significant predictor of both AAA development and aortic growth of >5 mm for both men and women, but not a better predictor of either outcomes compared to the AD. The role of ASI compared to the AD as a predictor of AAA development seems to be limited.

Abdominal aortic diameter and its determinants among healthy adults in Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: The abdominal aorta is the largest artery in the human body. Sonographic assessment of the abdominal aortic diameter is presently the preferred screening method for an aortic aneurysm. However, there are no customized nomograms for our population and the recommended cutoffs for screening may be inappropriate. The effect of factors such as age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on the abdominal aortic dissection (AAD) among blacks has also not been extensively investigated. OBJECTIVE: To develop a nomogram of AAD at various levels in Nigerian adults using high-resolution B mode ultrasonography and to evaluate the effect of factors such as gender, age, and BMI on AAD. METHODOLOGY: This study involved a sonographic evaluation of the abdominal aortic diameter of 400 normal Nigerian adults aged 18 years and above over a period of 17 months. The scan was done using a 3.5-5 MHz curvilinear transducer on the Mindray ultrasound machine (model: DC-8, SN-QE3B001806). The AAD (mean ± SD) was correlated with age, gender, BMI, and body surface area (BSA). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 for windows and P values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: The mean AADs decreased from 1.58 ± 0.24 cm in the upper aorta (D1) to 1.40 ± 0.20 cm at the level of the renal arteries (D2) and 1.29 ± 0.23 cm at the bifurcation (D3). Mean AAD was significantly higher at all levels of the abdominal aorta (D1, D2, and D3) in males than in females (P < 0.00) and correlated positively with age (P = 0.00) and height (P = 0.00) at D2 and D3 levels. CONCLUSION: Absolute AADs were relatively smaller in adult Nigerians and this should be considered when setting up screening programs for abdominal aortic aneurysm in our population. Further studies are needed to determine factors affecting AAD.