The REDUCED trial: a cluster randomized trial for REDucing the utilization of CEsarean delivery for dystocia.

BACKGROUND: To reduce cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous women, guidelines for diagnosing nonprogressive labor have been developed by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. These are mainly based on data from the Consortium for Safe Labor study. The guidelines have not been tested in a clinical trial, so the efficacy and safety of this new approach is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether adoption of new guidelines for diagnosing nonprogressing labor would reduce cesarean delivery rates. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial of a knowledge translation program of the guidelines in 26 Canadian hospitals (13 control sites and 13 intervention sites). The sites included all intrapartum care sites in Alberta that perform cesarean delivery and deliver at least 70 nulliparous women annually. The baseline period started on January 1, 2015. The intervention was initiated at the first intervention site in January 2017. The follow-up period began at the first intervention site in February 2017 and lasted till February 2020. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women with vertex presentation in labor at term. The secondary outcomes included spontaneous vaginal birth and maternal and neonatal safety. The main data source for the primary and secondary outcomes was the Alberta Perinatal Health Program database. The cesarean delivery rates were assessed using repeated measures mixed effects logistic regression applied to individual births. RESULTS: The analysis was based on 45,193 deliveries at intervention sites and 43,725 deliveries at control sites. There was no evidence of a decrease in the rate of cesarean delivery in association with the intervention (baseline-adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [0.85-1.05]; P=.259). The rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery increased slightly (baseline-adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, [1.01-1.18]; P=.024). We did not observe any differences in adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous women were not reduced by the application of recent guidelines for the diagnosis of nonprogressive labor. Spontaneous vaginal delivery-a secondary outcome-was increased in the intervention group. The intervention appears to be safe.

Changes in obstetrical practices and pregnancy outcomes following the ARRIVE trial.

BACKGROUND: The ARRIVE trial demonstrated the benefit of induction of labor at 39 weeks gestation. Obstetrics departments across the United States faced the challenge of adapting clinical practice in light of these data while managing logistical constraints. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there were changes in obstetrical practices and perinatal outcomes in the United States after the ARRIVE trial publication. STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of low-risk, nulliparous women who initiated prenatal care by 12 weeks gestation with singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies delivering at ≥39 weeks. Data were obtained from the US Natality database. The pre-ARRIVE group were women who delivered between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. The post-ARRIVE group consisted of women who delivered between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. Births that occurred in 2018 were excluded. Practice outcomes were rates of induction of labor, timing of delivery, and cesarean delivery rate. Adverse maternal outcomes were blood transfusion and admission to medical intensive care unit. Adverse neonatal outcomes were need for assisted ventilation (immediate and >6 hours), 5-minute APGAR score <3, neonatal intensive care unit admission, seizures, and surfactant use. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Trends were tested across the time period represented by the pre-ARRIVE group using Cochran-Armitage trend test. RESULTS: There were 1,966,870 births in the pre-ARRIVE group and 609,322 in the post-ARRIVE group. The groups differed in age, race, body mass index, marital status, infertility treatment, and smoking history (P<.001). After adjusting for these differences, the post-ARRIVE group was more likely to undergo induction (36.1% vs 30.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.36 [1.36-1.37]) and deliver by 39+6 weeks of pregnancy (42.8% vs 39.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.14 [1.14-1.15]). The post-ARRIVE group had a significantly lower rate of cesarean delivery than the pre-ARRIVE group (27.3 % vs 27.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.94 [0.93-0.94]). Patients in the post-ARRIVE group were more likely to receive a blood transfusion (0.4% vs 0.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.43 [1.36-1.50]) and be admitted to medical intensive care unit (0.09% vs 0.08%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.20 [1.09-1.33]). Neonates in the post-ARRIVE group were more likely to need assisted ventilation at birth (3.5% vs 2.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.28 [1.26-1.30]) and >6 hours (0.6% vs 0.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.36 [1.31-1.41]). The neonates in the post-ARRIVE group were more likely to have low 5-minute APGAR scores (0.4% vs 0.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [0.86-0.95]). Neonatal intensive care unit admission did not differ between the 2 groups (4.9% vs 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.01 [0.99-1.03]). There were no differences in neonatal seizures (0.04% vs 0.04%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.97 [0.84-1.13]), and surfactant use (0.08% vs 0.07%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.05 [0.94-1.17]) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: There were more inductions of labor, more deliveries at 39 weeks' gestation, and fewer cesarean deliveries in the year after the ARRIVE trial publication. The small but statistically significant increase in some adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes should be explored to determine if they are related with concurrent changes in obstetrical practices.

Cesarean delivery on maternal request and its influencing factors in Chongqing, China.

BACKGROUND: A high rate of cesarean delivery has become a cause of global concern. Although the rate of cesarean delivery has declined over recent years, it remains at a high level largely because of cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR). Unnecessary cesarean delivery has limited significance in benefiting maternal and infant physical health; in some ways, it might pose potential risks instead. With the implementation of the "Two-child Policy" in China, an increasing number of women plan to have a second child. Accordingly, how to handle the CDMR rate in China remains an important issue. METHODS: Data were collected from a longitudinal follow-up study conducted in Chongqing, China, from 2018 to 2019. A structured questionnaire was administered to subjects for data collection. Basic information, including demographic characteristics, living habits, medical history, and follow-up data of pregnant women, as well as their families and society, was collected. Additionally, delivery outcomes were recorded. Logistic regression was performed to analyze the factors influencing CDMR. RESULTS: The rate of cesarean delivery in Chongqing, China was 36.01 %, and the CDMR rate was 8.42 %. Maternal request (23.38 %), fetal distress (22.73 %), and pregnancy complications (9.96 %) were the top three indications for cesarean delivery. Logistic regression analysis showed that older age (OR = 4.292, 95 % CI: 1.984-9.283) and being a primiparous woman (OR = 6.792, 95 % CI: 3.230-14.281) were risk factors for CDMR. In addition, CDMR was also associated with factors such as the tendency to choose cesarean delivery during late pregnancy (OR = 5.525, 95 % CI: 2.116-14.431), frequent contact with mothers who had undergone vaginal deliveries (OR = 0.547, 95 % CI: 0.311-0.961), and the recommendation of cesarean delivery by doctors (OR = 4.071, 95 % CI: 1.007-16.455). CONCLUSIONS: "Maternal request" has become the primary indication for cesarean delivery. The occurrence of CDMR is related to both the personal factors of women during pregnancy and others. Medical institutions and obstetricians should continue popularizing delivery knowledge among pregnant women, enhancing their own professional knowledge about delivery, adhering to the standard indications for cesarean delivery, and providing pregnant women with adequate opportunities for attempting vaginal delivery.

Non-adherence to labor guidelines in cesarean sections done for failed induction and arrest of dilation.

OBJECTIVES: In 2014, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology published guidelines for diagnosing failed induction of labor (FIOL) and arrest of dilation (AOD) to prevent cesarean delivery (CD). The objectives of this study were to determine the rate of adherence to these guidelines and to compare the association of guideline adherence with physician CD rates and obstetric/neonatal outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort review of singleton primary cesarean deliveries for FIOL and AOD at a single academic institution from 2014 to 2016. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare adherence to the guidelines with physician CD rates and obstetric/neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 591 cesarean deliveries in the study, 263 were for failed induction, 328 for AOD and 79% (468/591) were not adherent to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (ACOG/SMFM) guidelines. Of the failed inductions, 82% (215/263) and of the AODs 77% (253/328) were not adherent. There was no difference between adherent and non-adherent CDs with regard to maternal characteristics, or obstetric/neonatal outcomes. Duration of oxytocin use after rupture of membranes, dilation at time of CD, and birth weight were statistically higher in adherent CDs. On multivariate linear regression, physician CD rates were inversely correlated with adherence to ACOG/SMFM guidelines (p<0.0001), gestational age (p=0.007), and parity (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that physician non-compliance with ACOG guidelines was high. Adherence to these guidelines was associated with lower physician CD rates, without an increase in obstetric or neonatal complications.

"Doing something" about the cesarean delivery rate.

There is a general consensus that the cesarean delivery rate in the United States is too high, and that practice patterns of obstetricians are largely to blame for this situation. In reality, the US cesarean delivery rate is the result of 3 forces largely beyond the control of the practicing clinician: patient expectations and misconceptions regarding the safety of labor, the medical-legal system, and limitations in technology. Efforts to "do something" about the cesarean delivery rate by promulgating practice directives that are marginally evidence-based or influenced by social pressures are both ineffective and potentially harmful. We examine both the recent American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)/Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Care Consensus Statement "Safe Prevention of Primary Cesarean Delivery" document and the various iterations of the ACOG guidelines for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in this context. Adherence to arbitrary time limits for active phase or second-stage arrest without incorporating other clinical factors into the decision-making process is unwise. In a similar manner, ever-changing practice standards for vaginal birth after cesarean driven by factors other than changing data are unlikely to be effective in lowering the cesarean delivery rate. Whether too high or too low, the current US cesarean delivery rate is the expected result of the unique demographic, geographic, and social forces driving it and is unlikely to change significantly given the limitations of current technology to otherwise satisfy the demands of these forces.

Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.

BACKGROUND: Trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) is a viable option for safe delivery. In some cases cervical ripening and subsequent labor induction is necessary. However, the commonly used prostaglandins are not licensed in this subgroup of patients and are associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture. METHODS: This cohort study compares maternal and neonatal outcomes of TOLAC in women (n=82) requiring cervical ripening agents (osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandins). The initial Bishop scores (BSs) were 2 (0-5) and 3 (0-5) (osmotic dilator and prostaglandin group, respectively). In this retrospective analysis, Fisher's exact test, the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Pearson's chi-squared test were utilized. RESULTS: Vaginal birth rate (including operative delivery) was 55% (18/33) in the osmotic dilator group vs. 51% (25/49) in the dinoprostone group (P 0.886). Between 97% and 92% (32/33 and 45/49) (100%, 100%) of neonates had an Apgar score of >8 after 1 min (5, 10 min, respectively). The time between administration of the agent and onset of labor was 36 and 17.1 h (mean, Dilapan-S® group, dinoprostone group, respectively). Time from onset of labor to delivery was similar in both groups with 4.4 and 4.9 h (mean, Dilapan-S® group, dinoprostone group, respectively). Patients receiving cervical ripening with Dilapan-S® required oxytocin in 97% (32/33) of cases. Some patients presented with spontaneous onset of labor, mostly in the dinoprostone group (24/49, 49%). Amniotomy was performed in 64% and 49% (21/33 and 24/49) of cases (Dilapan-S® group and dinoprostone group, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study examines the application of an osmotic dilator for cervical ripening to promote vaginal delivery in women who previously delivered via cesarean section. In our experience, the osmotic dilator gives obstetricians a chance to perform induction of labor in these women.

Comparing variation in hospital rates of cesarean delivery among low-risk women using 3 different measures.

This report describes the development of a measure of low-risk cesarean delivery by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Safely lowering the cesarean delivery rate is a priority for maternity care clinicians and health care delivery systems. Therefore, hospital quality assurance programs are increasingly tracking cesarean delivery rates among low-risk pregnancies. Two commonly used definitions of "low risk" are available, the Joint Commission (JC) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) measures, but these measures are not clinically comprehensive. We sought to refine the definition of the low-risk cesarean delivery rate to enhance the validity of the metric for quality measurement. We created this refined definition-called the SMFM definition-and compared it to the JC and AHRQ measures using claims-based data from the 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample of >863,000 births in 612 hospitals. Using these definitions, we calculated means and interquartile ranges (25th-75th percentile range) for hospital low-risk cesarean delivery rates, stratified by hospital size, teaching status, urban/rural location, and payer mix. Across all hospitals, the mean low-risk cesarean delivery rate was lowest for the SMFM definition (12.65%), but not substantially different from the JC and AHRQ measures (13.12% and 13.29%, respectively). We empirically examined the SMFM definition to ensure its validity and utility. This refined definition performs similarly to existing measures and has the added advantage of clinical perspective, enhanced face validity, and ease of use.

Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model.

BACKGROUND: Laborist practice models are associated with lower rates of cesarean delivery than individual private practice models in several studies; however, this effect is not uniform. Further exploration of laborist models may help us better understand the observed decrease in rates of cesarean delivery in some hospitals that implement a laborist model. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the degree of variation in rates of primary cesarean delivery by individual laborists within a single institution that uses a laborist model. In addition, we sought to evaluate whether differences in rates of cesarean delivery resulted in different maternal or short-term neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: At this teaching institution, one laborist (either a generalist or maternal-fetal medicine attending physician) is directly responsible for labor and delivery management during each shift. No patients are followed in a private practice model nor are physicians incentivized to perform deliveries. We retrospectively identified all laborists who delivered nulliparous, term women with cephalic singletons at this institution from 2007 to 2014. Overall and individual primary cesarean delivery rates were reported as percentages with exact Pearson 95% confidence intervals. Laborists were grouped by tertile as having low, medium, or high rates of cesarean delivery. Characteristics of the women delivered, indications for cesarean delivery, and short-term neonatal outcomes were compared between these groups. A binomial regression model of cesarean delivery was estimated, where the relative rates of each laborist compared with the lowest-unadjusted laborist rate were calculated; a second model was estimated to adjust for patient-level maternal characteristics. RESULTS: Twenty laborists delivered 2224 nulliparous, term women with cephalic singletons. The overall cesarean delivery rate was 24.1% (95% confidence interval 21.4-26.8). In an unadjusted binomial model, the overall effect of individual laborist was significant (P < .001), and a 2.9-fold (1.5-5.4, P = .001) variation between the cesarean delivery rates of the greatest (35.9%) and lowest (12.5%) physicians was observed. When adjusted for hypertensive disease, gestational age at delivery, race, and maternal age, the physician effect remained overall significant (P = .0265) with the difference between physicians expanding to 3.58 (1.72-7.47, P <. 001). Between groups of laborists with low, medium, and high rates of cesarean delivery, patient demographics and clinical characteristics of the population managed were clinically similar and not different statistically. The primary indication for cesarean delivery did not differ between groups. Similarly there were no differences in short-term neonatal outcomes, including Apgar scores, arterial cord blood pH, or the incidence of neonatal encephalopathy. CONCLUSION: The 3-fold variation in cesarean delivery rates between laborists at the same institution without observed differences in patient characteristics or short-term neonatal outcomes draws attention to the impact of individual physician decision-making on cesarean delivery rates even within a laborist care model. Further exploration of the role of individual physician decision-making on cesarean rates may help to better elucidate the effect of the laborist model.

Survey of Obstetric Care and Cesarean Delivery Rates in Shanghai, China.

BACKGROUND: China has one of the highest cesarean delivery rates in the world, with most cesareans done without indication. METHODS: Observation of how perinatal care is delivered in a range of Shanghai hospitals was done to gain insight into the 50 percent cesarean delivery rate. A mixed methods approach combined a descriptive structured survey of obstetric services with standardized interview with obstetricians and qualitative observation of obstetric services in six different Shanghai obstetric facilities. RESULTS: The volume was extremely high: physicians in public hospitals routinely saw up to 80-120 prenatal patients per day. Frequent prenatal testing substituted for time spent in patient-doctor interactions. Family members were not allowed in delivery wards where women labored alone. Obstetrics services had low levels of nursing support and anesthesia for labor. Physical space favored rapid surgical turnover over longer labor. Physicians reported practical incentives to perform cesarean sections. DISCUSSION: Cesarean delivery was an efficient way to move patients through the systems observed, given the staffing and physical limitations of the public facilities. Physicians reported that patients and families perceived cesarean delivery as safer. Physicians also reported fear of charges of malpractice, for which they might be found to be financially liable or in physical danger. Societal expectations are high, and in a "one child" society, perception that cesarean section was safer may also have driven cesarean rates. Given the end of the One Child Policy, the preference for cesarean delivery may change.

Management of prolonged pregnancy by induction with a Foley catheter.

OBJECTIVES: To describe labor outcomes in women with prolonged pregnancy and induction of labor with a Foley catheter, as compared with women with spontaneous onset of labor. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Helsinki University Hospital. SAMPLE: 553 women with uncomplicated prolonged pregnancies between January 2011 and January 2012, divided into 303 women (54.8%) with Foley catheter induction and 250 (45.2%) with spontaneous labor. METHODS: Maternal and neonatal characteristics of women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy of ≥41(+5) weeks of gestation were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cesarean delivery rates, maternal and neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: The cesarean delivery rate was 30.7% (n = 93/303) in women with labor induction and 4.8% (12/250) in women with spontaneous onset of labor (p < 0.001). The cesarean delivery rate was 37.3% (91/244) among nulliparous women with labor induction and 8.7% (11/126) among women with spontaneous labor, a sixfold increased risk (odds ratio 6.2). Among parous women, cesarean section rates were low and not significantly different (3.4% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.2). There were no differences in maternal intrapartum or postpartum infection rates or adverse neonatal outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Foley catheter induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy did not increase maternal or perinatal morbidity compared with spontaneous onset of labor but was associated with a considerably increased cesarean section rate, particularly among nulliparous women.

The rate of cesarean delivery changes after internal audit based on the Robson Ten Group Classification System in Lebanon.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of the Robson classification as an internal clinical audit and feedback of the high rate of cesarean delivery at Hotel Dieu de France, a tertiary referral hospital. METHODS: A pre-post study was conducted, with a retrospective approach in 2018 and 2019, identified as the pre-period (before the implementation of the Robson classification), and with a prospective approach in 2020 and 2021, labeled the post-period. RESULTS: The total number of deliveries during the study period was 2560; 1305 patients were included in the pre-period and 1255 patients delivered in the post-period. No significant differences between the two groups were found. No significant difference was found in the overall rate of cesarean delivery between the first and second periods (57.86% vs 56.72%; P = 0.2). However, a significant decrease in the absolute contribution of groups 3 and 4 (multiparous women without a previous uterine scar with a single cephalic pregnancy, ≥37 weeks of gestation, with spontaneous labor or induced labor) in the overall rate of cesarean delivery was remarked (P = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Robson classification seems to be appropriate to monitor and audit the rate of cesarean delivery, but not sufficient to decrease the rate and change the practice.

FIGO opinion paper: Drivers and solutions to the cesarean delivery epidemic with emphasis on the increasing rates in Africa and Southeastern Europe.

Cesarean delivery rates are rapidly increasing in Southeastern Europe (to more than 60%), North Africa (with a rate as high as 72% in Egypt), and in urban areas in Southern Africa (a rate of over 50% in Lagos, Nigeria). Data on the background to these increases are scarce, but likely to include poor birthing facilities in general hospitals, convenience for the doctor, private medicine, fear of litigation, socioeconomic status, shortage of midwives and nurses, and disappearance of vaginal instrumental deliveries. Options to reverse cesarean delivery trends are discussed. In this context there is a need to be better informed about how women are being counseled regarding vaginal or cesarean delivery. The long-term consequences in subsequent pregnancies for mothers and children may well be largely ignored, while these risks are highest in LMICs where higher birth numbers are desired. FIGO has begun discussions with obstetric and gynecologic societies, healthcare bodies, and governments in several countries discussed in this article, to find ways to lower the cesarean delivery rate. The requests came from the countries themselves, which may prove beneficial in helping advance progress.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Obesity-Related Induction Complications in Nulliparae at Term: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Women with obesity are at increased risk of complications during and after labor and delivery, including puerperal infection and cesarean delivery. As labor induction has become increasingly common, it is crucial to find ways to decrease complication rates in this high-risk population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effect of prophylactic antibiotics during labor induction of nulliparous women with obesity on the rates of cesarean delivery and puerperal infection and to estimate the parameters needed to calculate the sample size for a larger, multicenter trial. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial, nulliparous patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 were randomized to either prophylactic antibiotics (500 mg azithromycin for 1 dose and 2 g cefazolin every 8 hours for up to 3 doses) or placebo, administered starting at the beginning of labor induction. The exclusion criteria were known fetal anomaly, fetal demise, multifetal gestation, ruptured membranes >12 hours, infection requiring antibiotics at the start of labor induction, and/or allergy to azithromycin or beta-lactam antibiotics. The co-primary outcomes were rates of puerperal infection (composite of chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and/or cesarean delivery wound infection) and cesarean delivery. Participants were followed up for 30 days after delivery, and maternal and neonatal demographic and outcome data were collected. Proportions and 95% confidence limits were calculated for each of these outcomes. RESULTS: From January 2019 to May 2021, 101 patients were randomized in the class III stratum (1 patient who was randomized ultimately did not undergo labor induction). From February 2020 to May 2021, 38 and 47 patients were randomized to class I and II strata, respectively (to assess the effect of obesity class on the outcomes expected to be influenced by antibiotic prophylaxis). In the antibiotics and placebo groups, the rates of cesarean delivery were 29.0% (95% confidence interval, 19.8-38.3) and 39.8% (95% confidence interval, 29.8-49.7), respectively, and puerperal infection occurred in 8.6% (95% confidence interval, 2.9-14.3) and 9.7% (95% confidence interval, 3.7-15.7), respectively. In the subgroup with class III obesity, in the antibiotics and placebo groups, the rates of cesarean delivery were 33.3% (95% confidence interval, 20.4-47.9) and 46.0% (95% confidence interval, 32.2-59.8), respectively, and puerperal infection occurred in 7.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.5-15.2) and 10.0% (95% confidence interval, 1.7-18.3), respectively. Note that this pilot study was not powered to detect differences of this magnitude but rather to estimate parameters. CONCLUSION: The administration of prophylactic antibiotics during labor induction of nulliparous patients with obesity resulted in a 27% lower cesarean delivery rate overall and a 28% lower rate in patients with class III obesity. A larger trial is warranted to evaluate these differences.

High- vs low-dose oxytocin in lean and obese women: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Women with obesity are likely to experience longer lengths of labor and are at an increased risk of cesarean delivery. We hypothesized that high-dose oxytocin would decrease the time to delivery in a cohort of women with obesity undergoing induction of labor. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether women with obesity benefited from higher doses of oxytocin for induction of labor. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of low-dose and high-dose oxytocin on length of labor. We recruited women who were undergoing induction of labor at ≥37 weeks of gestation. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive low-dose or high-dose oxytocin stratified by obesity level (obese and lean). The primary outcome was length of time (minutes) to vaginal delivery. The secondary outcomes included overall cesarean delivery rate, cesarean delivery for labor arrest, maximum oxytocin infusion rate, oxytocin infusion discontinuation, oxytocin infusion decrease, blood loss, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal Apgar scores. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were randomized into receiving low-dose and high-dose oxytocin stratified into obese and lean stratum (35 for all strata). The primary outcome, time to vaginal delivery, was similar between the low-dose and high-dose oxytocin groups in the lean stratum (796 [±411] vs 694 [±466] minutes; P=.363) and the stratum with obesity (715 [±497] vs 762 [±594] minutes; P=.733). Kaplan-Meier curves between the low-dose and high-dose oxytocin groups were not significantly different in the lean stratum (P=.391) and the stratum with obesity (P=.692). There were 5 cesarean deliveries (14.29%) in the low-dose oxytocin lean stratum vs 2 cesarean deliveries (5.71%) in the high-dose oxytocin lean stratum (P=.232). There were 4 cesarean deliveries (11.43%) in the low-dose oxytocin stratum with obesity vs 1 cesarean delivery (2.86%) in the high-dose oxytocin stratum with obesity (P=.164). There was no difference in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage between the lean stratum (P=0.526) and the stratum with obesity (P=0.212). There was no difference in mean estimated blood loss between the lean stratum (P=.472) and the stratum with obesity (P=.215). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in time to delivery between the low-dose and high-dose oxytocin protocols in either the lean cohorts or cohorts with obesity undergoing induction of labor. We did observe a trend toward a lower rate of cesarean delivery in both lean women and women with obesity when high-dose oxytocin was used.

Interventions to reduce the cesarean delivery rate in a tertiary hospital in China.

INTRODUCTION: High cesarean delivery rate has been a global public health concern. This study assesses the effect of medical interventions and societal changes on cesarean delivery rates in a Chinese tertiary hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study including all live births ≥34-week gestation between 2008 and 2016 from Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center was divided into 5 stages: (1) no interventions; (2) patient-controlled epidural analgesia; (3) episiotomy restriction; (4) new labor management; (5) universal two-child policy. An interrupted time series design was used to measure the effect of interventions on overall cesarean rate, primary cesarean rate, maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: There were 126,609 deliveries including 49,092 cesarean deliveries and 77,517 vaginal deliveries in this period. Overall cesarean delivery rate declined after implementing patient-controlled epidural analgesia, episiotomy restriction and universal two-child policy. Primary cesarean rate decreased after implementing episiotomy restriction. Cesarean rate with previous cesarean dramatically increased, and maternal request cesarean rate decreased gradually. Low Apgar rate (score ≤7 at 5 min) increased after episiotomy restriction and maternal postpartum hemorrhage rate increased after new labor management. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia, episiotomy restriction and the universal two-child policy showed the most significant effects to reducing the cesarean rate.

Impact of WHO Labor Care Guide on reducing cesarean sections at a tertiary center: an open-label randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization Labor Care Guide was introduced in December 2020 to implement World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effect of the WHO Labor Care Guide on labor outcomes, especially in reducing primary cesarean deliveries, and its acceptability by healthcare providers. STUDY DESIGN: This open-label randomized control trial was conducted from September 2021 to December 2021 on 280 low-risk antenatal women admitted for delivery at a busy tertiary care institute in North India. After informed consent, women were allocated into the study and control groups. Labor monitoring was performed using the WHO Labor Care Guide in the study group and the World Health Organization-modified partograph in the control group. Women who had a cesarean delivery in the latent phase of labor were excluded from the study. The primary outcome was mode of delivery, whereas the secondary outcomes were duration of active labor, maternal complications (postpartum hemorrhage and puerperal sepsis), duration of hospital stay, Apgar score at 5 minutes, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. The labor outcomes in both groups were compared. In the study group, the acceptability, difficulty, and satisfaction levels of the users were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. The "learning curve" for the use of the Labor Care Guide (LCG) was determined. SPSS software (version 21.0; IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: After excluding women who underwent cesarean delivery in the latent phase, 136 women in the study group and 135 women in the control group were observed for labor outcomes. The cesarean delivery rate was 1.5% in the study group vs 17.8% in the control group (P=.0001). The duration of the active phase of labor was significantly shorter in the study group than in the control group (P<.001). The 2 groups were similar in terms of maternal complications, duration of hospital stay, and Apgar score. The learning curve took average levels of 6.50 and 2.25 Labor Care Guide plots to shift from "very difficult" to "neutral" and "neutral" to "easy," respectively. After an initial learning curve, acceptability and satisfaction levels were found to be high in the WHO Labor Care Guide users. CONCLUSION: The WHO Labor Care Guide is a simple labor monitoring tool for the reducing primary cesarean delivery rate without increasing the duration of hospital stay and fetomaternal complications.

Implementation of a calculator to predict cesarean delivery during labor induction: a qualitative evaluation of the clinician perspective.

BACKGROUND: We previously conducted a prospective cohort study (n=1610) demonstrating that the implementation of a validated calculator to predict likelihood of cesarean delivery during labor induction was associated with reduced maternal morbidity, reduced cesarean delivery rate, and improved birth satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: To optimize future implementation, we used qualitative interviews to understand the clinician perspective on: (1) the cesarean delivery risk calculator implementation and (2) the mechanisms by which the use of the calculator resulted in the observed improved outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: After completion of the prospective study (June 30, 2019), 20 trainees and attending clinicians (including nurse-midwives, obstetrical physicians, and family medicine physicians) at the study site participated in a single, brief semistructured interview from March 1, 2020, to June 30, 2020. Transcriptions were coded using a systematic approach. RESULTS: Overall, clinicians had favorable perspectives regarding the cesarean delivery risk calculator. Clinicians described the calculator as offering "objective data" and a "standardized snapshot of the labor trajectory." Concerns were raised regarding "overreliance" on calculator output. Barriers to use included time for patient counseling and "awkwardness" around the interactions and perceived patient misunderstanding of the calculator result. Although most senior clinicians (n=8) reported that the calculator did not impact patient management, trainee clinicians (n=12) more often felt that the calculator influenced care at the extremes of cesarean delivery risk. Furthermore, more senior clinicians felt "neutral" regarding any impact of counseling patients on cesarean delivery risk compared with trainee clinicians, who felt that the counseling "built [patient-clinician] trust." CONCLUSION: This qualitative evaluation characterized the generally positive clinician perspective around the cesarean delivery risk calculator, while identifying specific facilitators and barriers to implementation. In addition, we elucidated potential mechanisms by which the calculator may have been related to clinician decision making and patient-clinician interactions, leading to reduced maternal morbidity and improved patient birth satisfaction. This information is important as widespread implementation of the cesarean delivery risk calculator begins.

A standardized labor induction protocol: impact on racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There are marked disparities between black and nonblack women in the United States in birth outcomes. Yet, there are little data on methods to reduce these disparities. Although the cause of racial disparities in health is multifactorial, implicit bias is thought to play a contributing role. To target differential management, studies in nonobstetrical populations have demonstrated disparity reduction through care standardization. With wide variation by site and provider, labor management practices are the ideal target for standardization. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of a standardized induction of labor protocol on racial disparities in cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective cohort study of women undergoing an induction from 2013 to 2015. Full-term (≥37 weeks' gestation) women carrying a singleton pregnancy with intact membranes and an unfavorable cervix (dilation ≤2 cm, Bishop score of ≤6) were included. We compared the cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal morbidity between 2 groups stratified by race (black vs nonblack) as follows: (1) women induced in a randomized trial (n=491) that utilized an induction protocol with standardized recommendations for interventions such as oxytocin and amniotomy at particular time points and (2) women in an observational arm (n=364) enrolled at the same time whose induction and labor management occurred at provider discretion. Regression modeling was used to test an interaction between the induction protocol and race. RESULTS: A significant reduction in cesarean delivery rate in black women managed with the induction protocol was noted when compared with those in the observational group (25.7% vs 34.2%; P=.02), whereas there was no difference in cesarean delivery rate in nonblack women (34.6% vs 29.9%; P=.41). The induction protocol reduced the racial disparity in cesarean delivery rate (interaction term, P=.04), even when controlling for parity, body mass index, indication for labor induction, and Bishop score at induction start. In addition, a significant reduction in neonatal morbidity was found in black women managed with the induction protocol (2.9% vs 8.9%; P=.001), with no difference in nonblack women (3.6% vs 5.5%; P=.55). The induction protocol did not significantly affect maternal morbidity for either race. CONCLUSION: A standardized induction protocol is associated with reduced cesarean delivery rate and neonatal morbidity in black women undergoing induction. Further studies should determine whether implementation of induction protocols in diverse settings could reduce national racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes.

Validation of a statistical toolkit based on the ten-group Robson Classification of cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of a statistical toolkit based on the original ten-group Robson Classification of cesarean delivery. METHODS: A retrospective pilot study at Al Wakra Hospital in Doha, Qatar, was conducted from June 1 to June 30, 2017, involving consecutive women undergoing cesarean delivery, using a three-stage approach. A Microsoft Excel-based toolkit was developed by dividing each of the 10 groups of the original Robson Classification into clinical groups and subgroups. A critical review of the toolkit was then undertaken by four independent physicians based on different potential clinical scenarios that could culminate in cesarean delivery in each Robson group. The toolkit was validated by populating it with the data of the cesarean deliveries of the women involved in the study. RESULTS: The data from cesarean deliveries of 153 women were utilized in the pilot study. The toolkit catered for and successfully accommodated 94.8% of the cases without any need for change. The remaining 5.2% of cases required additional adjustments in the toolkit. The toolkit provided instant access to important data about the labor and delivery which could be used for audit and research purposes and ultimately for service improvement. CONCLUSION: The toolkit significantly improved the clinical efficacy of the Robson Classification as a potential statistical tool for comparison of local and international data.

Trend in cesarean delivery rate among twin pregnancies over a 20 years epoch and the accompanied maternal and perinatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the trend of cesarean delivery (CD) rate among twin pregnancies and the trend in maternal and neonatal morbidities within two decades. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort study, conducted at a single teaching hospital in Israel on data between January 1995 and December 2015. All pregnant women with twin gestation who delivered at a gestational age of 24 weeks or more were included. Data on mode of deliveries, Apgar score <7 at 5 min, cord artery pH < 7.1, early postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, and intrapartum fever for each year were extracted and plotted, and trends were analyzed. CDs performed for one or both twins were divided to laboring, i.e., after a trial of labor, and non-laboring CDs. Data was obtained from the hospital discharge register with ICD-9 codes and crosschecked with the labor medical records. The Cochran-Armitage Trend Test was used to identify trends and correlations. RESULTS: Of all 88,145 deliveries that took place during this period, 1955 (2.2%) were twins. Of these 53 were ineligible and were excluded. There was a statistically significant trend (increase) in twins birth over time (p = 0.004). CD rate increased significantly from 43.4% in 1995 to 66.0% in 2015 (p = 0.001). This increase was observed only among non-laboring cesareans (p = 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that maternal and early neonatal morbidities examined did not differ significantly during the study period. CONCLUSION: Non-laboring CD rate increased significantly over the past two decades among twin pregnancies. Despite this increase, maternal and early neonatal morbidities did not change.